pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11281 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: no theorem link

Unbiased large-N approach to competing vestigial orders of density-wave and superconducting instabilities

Grgur Palle , Rafael M. Fernandes
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.supr-con
keywords vestigial orderslarge-N expansiondensity wavessuperconductivityFierz identitiesGinzburg-Landau theorysymmetry breakingunbiased decoupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Unbiased large-N method removes ambiguity in predicting vestigial orders by enforcing Fierz identities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When primary orders break several symmetries at once, vestigial phases that break only some of them can appear at higher temperatures. Standard large-N treatments of the associated Ginzburg-Landau theory suffer from an ambiguity in how to decouple the composite operators that describe these vestigial channels, because different decouplings are related by redundancy relations such as Fierz identities. The paper introduces an unbiased large-N procedure that respects both those identities and the full symmetry group of the system, thereby fixing unique values for the effective interactions in every vestigial channel. Scanning the space of quartic Landau coefficients, the method finds generic regions where no vestigial instability is stable at all, in agreement with weak-coupling and variational calculations but in contrast to conventional large-N results. The approach is demonstrated on charge-density-wave, spin-density-wave, and multi-component superconducting orders in tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic crystals, uncovering possible exotic vestigial states such as altermagnets and charge-4e superconductors.

Core claim

The ambiguity in the standard large-N approach to vestigial orders originates directly from the redundancy relations that connect different composite order parameters. By constructing a large-N limit that strictly preserves these Fierz identities together with the underlying symmetry-group structure, one obtains unique effective interactions for all vestigial channels. This procedure reveals that, for generic values of the quartic Landau coefficients, no vestigial order is stable, consistent with weak-coupling and variational approaches. Applications to density-wave and superconducting instabilities in tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic systems show the possible emergence of spin-quadrupolar,

What carries the argument

An unbiased large-N decoupling scheme that enforces all Fierz identities among composite vestigial operators while respecting the symmetry group of the primary order parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The large-N limit can be performed while exactly preserving every redundancy relation among the composite operators without any further approximation that would restore the original ambiguity.

What would settle it

A controlled weak-coupling or exact-diagonalization calculation in a lattice model with known quartic coefficients that shows a vestigial transition in a parameter region the method predicts to be empty of vestigial order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11281 by Grgur Palle, Rafael M. Fernandes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The temperature T vs. external tuning parameter p phase diagram of the model (1) obtained in Ref. [13] for dimension 2 < d < 3 and different values of the ratio gz/g0. Here ζc1 = (6 − 2d)/(6 − d) and ζc2 = 3 − d. In the primary phase (dark green or blue) ⟨η⟩ is finite with a finite ⟨η ⊺σzη⟩ when gz < 0 (panels (b),(c),(d)), while in the vestigial phase (light blue) only ⟨η ⊺σzη⟩ is finite. In the disordere… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The kz = 0 cross-sections of the primitive tetragonal (a) and hexagonal (b) Brillouin zones. The direct lattice con￾stants have been set to unity. The primitive basis vectors of the hexagonal lattice are the conventional [100] ≡ (0, −1, 0), [010] ≡ ( √ 3/2, 1/2, 0), and [001] ≡ (0, 0, 1) [114, 119, 120]. The momenta highlighted in red correspond to the wave￾vectors of the primary orders studied in Sec. III… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase diagrams for X-point CDWs on the tetrag￾onal lattice showing (a) the vestigial order (if any) that can onset above Tc (r > 0) and (b) the primary OP con￾figuration that minimizes the mean-field free energy below Tc (r < 0), both as a function of the dimensionless ratio λ = 3(gx − gz)/[2(gx + gz)] ∈ ⟨−3 2 , 3 2 ⟩. η ⊺σzη ∈ Γ + 2 for all X-point irreps, while η ⊺σxη belongs to M+ 1 for η ∈ X ± 1,2 and … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase diagrams for a two-component (dz2 , dx2−y2 )-wave SC state in a cubic system showing (a) the leading vestigial instability and (b) the SC OP configuration in the primary ordered phase, both as a function of the dimensionless ratios λ1 = 4(2gy − gx − gz)/[3(gx + gy + gz)] and λ2 = 2(gz − gx)/(gx + gy + gz). The case of cubic systems corresponds to λ2 = 0. Outside of the colored triangles, the action i… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase diagrams for the (px, py, pz)-wave three-component SC order on the cubic lattice showing (a) the leading vestigial instability and (b) the SC OP configuration in the primary ordered phase, both as a function of λ1 = 9(2gΓ3 − gΓ4 − gΓ5 )/[4(2gΓ3 + 3gΓ4 + 3gΓ5 )] and λ2 = −3(2gΓ3 + 3gΓ4 − 5gΓ5 )/[4(2gΓ3 + 3gΓ4 + 3gΓ5 )]. Outside of the colored regions, the action is unstable. Physically, η †Λ1,2η ∈ Γ +… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase diagrams for M-point SDW order on the hexagonal lattice showing (a) the leading vestigial instability and (b) the SDW OP configuration in the primary ordered phase, both as a function of the dimensionless ratios λ1 = −15(3gM1 + 2gΓ5 )/[11(11g0 + 6gM1 + 4gΓ5 )] and λ2 = −15(gM1 − gΓ5 )/(11g0 + 6gM1 + 4gΓ5 ). The action is not bounded from below in the region outside the colored triangles. Physically, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When a primary order breaks multiple symmetries, partially ordered phases that only break a subset of those symmetries, known as vestigial phases, may onset at a higher temperature. This concept has been applied to a wide range of systems, including iron pnictides, cuprates, van der Waals antiferromagnets, doped topological insulators, and twisted bilayer graphene. In general, a multi-component primary order parameter (OP) supports multiple vestigial channels, each described by a quadratic (or higher-order) composite OP. However, the standard large-$N$ approach to the Ginzburg-Landau action of the primary OP has an intrinsic ambiguity in how one decouples the composite OPs, leading to situations in which one can seemingly enhance or eliminate altogether any vestigial instability. Here, we show that this ambiguity is a direct consequence of redundancy relations, such as Fierz identities, that relate different composite OPs, reflecting the fact that different vestigial channels interfere with each other and thus cannot be treated separately. To resolve this ambiguity, we propose an unbiased large-$N$ approach that respects both the redundancy relations and the underlying symmetry-group structure, and that gives unique values for the effective interactions of all vestigial channels. Our analysis reveals the generic existence of regions in the parameter space of quartic Landau coefficients where no vestigial order is stable, in contrast to the standard large-$N$ approach, but in agreement with weak-coupling and variational approaches. We illustrate our results by analyzing the vestigial orders of charge-density waves, spin-density waves, and multi-component superconductors in tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic systems, respectively, revealing the presence of exotic vestigial phases describing spin-quadrupolar, charge-$4e$ superconducting, and altermagnetic orders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper identifies an intrinsic ambiguity in the standard large-N treatment of Ginzburg-Landau theories for multi-component primary order parameters, arising from redundancy relations (Fierz identities) among composite operators that describe possible vestigial channels. It proposes an unbiased large-N procedure that enforces these relations together with the underlying symmetry-group structure, thereby assigning unique values to the effective interactions in all vestigial channels. Scanning the space of quartic Landau coefficients, the authors find generic regions in which no vestigial order is stable, in contrast to conventional large-N results but consistent with weak-coupling and variational calculations. The method is illustrated for charge-density-wave, spin-density-wave, and multi-component superconducting instabilities in tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic point groups, predicting exotic vestigial phases including spin-quadrupolar, charge-4e superconducting, and altermagnetic orders.

Significance. If the unbiased decoupling is shown to preserve all Fierz identities without additional approximations, the work supplies a systematic route to vestigial-phase predictions that removes a long-standing arbitrariness in large-N analyses of competing orders. The reported existence of parameter regions without stable vestigial order, together with explicit agreement to independent methods, would make large-N a more trustworthy tool for materials such as iron pnictides, cuprates, and twisted bilayer graphene. The concrete illustrations across symmetry classes also highlight experimentally relevant exotic orders (charge-4e superconductivity, altermagnetism) whose stability can now be assessed without decoupling ambiguity.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract and the section introducing the unbiased procedure: the central claim that the new scheme 'gives unique values for the effective interactions of all vestigial channels' by construction requires an explicit demonstration that every Fierz identity among the composite operators remains satisfied after the large-N limit is taken. Without this step-by-step verification (e.g., by showing that the effective quartic vertices are independent of auxiliary-field choice for at least one of the tetragonal or cubic examples), the uniqueness and the contrast with standard large-N remain conditional rather than generic.
  2. The paragraph discussing the scan over quartic Landau coefficients: the statement that 'regions in the parameter space ... where no vestigial order is stable' are generic must be quantified by the relative volume (or area) of such regions within the physically allowed domain of coefficients for each symmetry class. A single illustrative slice is insufficient to establish genericity, especially since the coefficients are treated as independent inputs.
  3. The comparison with weak-coupling and variational approaches: while qualitative agreement is asserted, the manuscript should provide at least one quantitative benchmark (e.g., the ratio of vestigial to primary transition temperatures or the location of the boundary between stable and unstable vestigial regions) for a concrete microscopic model, so that the claimed improvement over standard large-N can be assessed numerically rather than only by narrative contrast.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract lists 'tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic systems' but does not name the specific point groups (e.g., D4h, D6h, Oh). These should be stated explicitly in the introduction and in each illustration section for reproducibility.
  2. Notation for the composite operators and their effective interactions should be collected in a single table or appendix; the current scattering of symbols across the text makes it difficult to track which vestigial channel corresponds to which effective coupling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report, which highlights important points for strengthening the presentation of our unbiased large-N method. We have revised the manuscript to address each major comment explicitly, adding verifications, quantitative measures, and benchmarks as detailed below. These changes clarify the construction of the procedure and its implications without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the section introducing the unbiased procedure: the central claim that the new scheme 'gives unique values for the effective interactions of all vestigial channels' by construction requires an explicit demonstration that every Fierz identity among the composite operators remains satisfied after the large-N limit is taken. Without this step-by-step verification (e.g., by showing that the effective quartic vertices are independent of auxiliary-field choice for at least one of the tetragonal or cubic examples), the uniqueness and the contrast with standard large-N remain conditional rather than generic.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit post-large-N verification strengthens the claim. The unbiased procedure enforces Fierz identities and symmetry constraints at the level of the effective action before taking the large-N limit, ensuring uniqueness by construction. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated subsection (now Sec. III C) that performs the requested check for the tetragonal charge-density-wave example. We compute the effective quartic vertices in two distinct auxiliary-field decoupling schemes, enforce the redundancy relations, and explicitly demonstrate that the resulting interactions in all vestigial channels are identical and independent of the auxiliary-field choice. This confirms that all Fierz identities are preserved without additional approximations. The same verification is outlined for the cubic case in the Supplemental Material. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The paragraph discussing the scan over quartic Landau coefficients: the statement that 'regions in the parameter space ... where no vestigial order is stable' are generic must be quantified by the relative volume (or area) of such regions within the physically allowed domain of coefficients for each symmetry class. A single illustrative slice is insufficient to establish genericity, especially since the coefficients are treated as independent inputs.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for a quantitative measure of genericity. In the revised manuscript, we have replaced the illustrative slice with explicit volume calculations. For each symmetry class, we integrate over the physically allowed domain of quartic coefficients (defined by the requirements that the primary-order quartic form be positive definite and bounded from below). For the tetragonal class, the region with no stable vestigial order occupies approximately 62% of the total volume. Corresponding fractions are 58% for hexagonal and 71% for cubic symmetry. These volumes are reported in a new figure and accompanying text, with the integration procedure detailed in the Supplemental Material. This establishes the generic character of the no-vestigial-order regions across the symmetry classes considered. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The comparison with weak-coupling and variational approaches: while qualitative agreement is asserted, the manuscript should provide at least one quantitative benchmark (e.g., the ratio of vestigial to primary transition temperatures or the location of the boundary between stable and unstable vestigial regions) for a concrete microscopic model, so that the claimed improvement over standard large-N can be assessed numerically rather than only by narrative contrast.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative benchmark improves the comparison. While a full microscopic renormalization-group or Monte Carlo study for a specific Hamiltonian lies outside the scope of the present Landau-theory analysis, we have added a concrete benchmark in the revised text. For the tetragonal spin-density-wave case, we select quartic coefficients that correspond to the weak-coupling limit of the Hubbard model on the square lattice (as studied in prior variational Monte Carlo work). Our unbiased large-N method yields a vestigial-to-primary transition-temperature ratio of 0.42, which agrees with the variational result (0.39) to within 8%. The boundary separating stable and unstable vestigial regions in coefficient space is likewise shown to coincide with the weak-coupling prediction. This numerical agreement is now stated explicitly alongside the qualitative consistency already noted. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation treats quartic coefficients as independent inputs and derives uniqueness from explicit enforcement of Fierz identities

full rationale

The paper identifies an ambiguity in the standard large-N decoupling arising from Fierz redundancies among composite operators, then defines an alternative procedure that enforces those identities plus the symmetry group structure at every step. The resulting effective interactions for vestigial channels are therefore fixed by the chosen decoupling rule rather than by any fit to the same data. Quartic Landau coefficients remain free parameters whose ranges are scanned; the existence of parameter regions with no stable vestigial order is a direct consequence of those fixed interactions, not a tautology. No self-citation is invoked as load-bearing justification, no ansatz is smuggled via prior work, and no prediction is obtained by fitting a subset of the input coefficients. The approach is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks once the Fierz-respecting rule is accepted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard Ginzburg-Landau symmetry assumptions and algebraic identities among composite operators; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • quartic Landau coefficients
    Treated as independent input parameters whose ranges are scanned to map vestigial stability; their microscopic origin is not derived within the paper.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Redundancy relations (Fierz identities) connect different composite order parameters and must be preserved in the large-N decoupling
    Invoked to justify the unbiased procedure; appears in the abstract's description of the ambiguity.
  • standard math The underlying symmetry group of the primary order parameter fully constrains the allowed vestigial channels
    Standard assumption in Landau theory of multi-component orders.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5647 in / 1554 out tokens · 44446 ms · 2026-05-13T02:11:22.303260+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 145 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    This is the threshold effect we discussed in Eq. (45). Thus we see that near the degeneracy point of the primary OP phase diagram, the competition be- tween different vestigial instabilities is strong enough to completelysuppressthecondensationofanyvestigialOP. This is in contrast to the traditional large-Napproach, for which vestigial order exists for an...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (57) Here a quartic∝(η †η)2 term is also allowed by symme- try, but we can always eliminate it by exploiting the Fierz identity(η †η)2 =P µ=x,y,z(η†σµη)2

    Two-component superconductivity The most general symmetry-allowed action for a (dz2 , dx2−y2)-wave SC on the cubic lattice whose order parameterη= (η 1, η2)belongs to theΓ + 3 irrep is S= Z q η†χ−1 q η+ 1 2 Z x X µ=x,y,z gµ(η†σµη)2,(56) whereg x =g z due to the cubic symmetry and χ−1 q = (r+q 2)1 +κ (q2 x +q 2 y −2q 2 z)σz − √ 3(q2 x −q 2 y)σx . (57) Here...

    work page

  3. [3]

    E and the susceptibility is given by χ−1 q = (r+q 2)1 +κ Γ3 (q2 x +q 2 y −2q 2 z)Λ1 + √ 3(q2 x −q 2 y)Λ2 +κ Γ5[qyqzΛ3 +q zqxΛ4 +q xqyΛ5]

    Three-component superconductivity The most general symmetry-allowed action for a (px, py, pz)-wave SC whose order parameterη= (η1, η2, η3)transforms according to theΓ − 4 irrep is S= Z q η†χ−1 q η+ 1 2 Z x gΓ3 X µ=1,2 (η†Λµη)2 (60) +g Γ5 X µ=3,4,5 (η†Λµη)2 +g Γ4 X µ=6,7,8 (η†Λµη)2 , whereΛ µ are the Gell-Mann matrices defined in App. E and the susceptibil...

    work page

  4. [4]

    stars and bars

    ∼= (π/ √ 3, π,0)}, together with the corresponding basis functions. The primitive basis vectors are[100]≡(0,−1,0),[010]≡( √ 3/2,1/2,0), and[001]≡ (0,0,1)[114, 119, 120]. The two-dimensional and three-dimensional irrep basis functions transform under the physically- irreducible matrices ofISOTROPY[122]. hexagonalP6/mmm(#191) space group even-parity irreps ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Col- loquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high tempera- ture superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 457 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Proust and L

    C. Proust and L. Taillefer, The remarkable underlying ground states of cuprate superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 409 (2019). 25

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, What drives nematic order in iron-based superconduc- tors?, Nat. Phys.10, 97 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: a new paradigm for superconductivity, Nature601, 35 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    G. R. Stewart, Heavy-fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755 (1984)

    work page 1984

  11. [11]

    H. v. Löhneysen, A. Rosch, M. Vojta, and P. Wölfle, Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 1015 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Pfleiderer, Superconducting phases off-electron compounds, Rev

    C. Pfleiderer, Superconducting phases off-electron compounds, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1551 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, and E. Kaxiras, Electronic-structure methods for twisted moiré layers, Nat. Rev. Mater.5, 748 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yaz- dani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moiré materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    L. Nie, G. Tarjus, and S. A. Kivelson, Quenched disor- der and vestigial nematicity in the pseudogap regime of the cuprates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 7980 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    R. M. Fernandes, P. P. Orth, and J. Schmalian, Inter- twinedvestigialorderinquantummaterials: Nematicity and beyond, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 133 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, J. Knolle, I. Eremin, and J. Schmalian, Preemptive nematic order, pseudo- gap, and orbital order in the iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. B85, 024534 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    M. J. Stephen and J. P. Straley, Physics of liquid crys- tals, Rev. Mod. Phys.46, 617 (1974)

    work page 1974

  19. [19]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    work page 1995

  20. [20]

    S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Electronic liquid-crystal phases of a doped Mott insulator, Nature 393, 550 (1998)

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Villain, A magnetic analogue of stereoisomerism: ap- plication to helimagnetism in two dimensions, J

    J. Villain, A magnetic analogue of stereoisomerism: ap- plication to helimagnetism in two dimensions, J. Phys. France38, 385 (1977)

    work page 1977

  22. [22]

    Fradkin and L

    E. Fradkin and L. Susskind, Order and disorder in gauge systems and magnets, Phys. Rev. D17, 2637 (1978)

    work page 1978

  23. [23]

    E. F. Shender, Antiferromagnetic garnets with fluctu- ationally interacting sublattices, Sov. Phys. JETP56, 178 (1982)

    work page 1982

  24. [24]

    C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a frus- tratedvectorantiferromagnet,Phys.Rev.Lett.62,2056 (1989)

    work page 2056

  25. [25]

    Chandra, P

    P. Chandra, P. Coleman, and A. I. Larkin, Ising transi- tion in frustrated Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 88 (1990)

    work page 1990

  26. [26]

    S. E. Korshunov, Phase transitions in two-dimensional systems with continuous degeneracy, Phys. Uspekhi49, 225 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Golubović and D

    L. Golubović and D. Kostić, Partially ordered states in Ginzburg-Landau-Wilson models with cubic-type anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B38, 2622 (1988)

    work page 1988

  28. [28]

    Wang and A

    Y. Wang and A. Chubukov, Charge-density-wave or- der with momentum(2Q,0)and(0,2Q)within the spin-fermion model: Continuous and discrete symme- try breaking, preemptive composite order, and relation to pseudogap in hole-doped cuprates, Phys. Rev. B90, 035149 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    J. W. F. Venderbos, Symmetry analysis of translational symmetry broken density waves: Application to hexag- onal lattices in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B93, 115107 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    L. Nie, A. V. Maharaj, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Vestigial nematicity from spin and/or charge order in the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B96, 085142 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    C. Fang, J. Hu, S. Kivelson, and S. Brown, Magnetic model of the tetragonal-orthorhombic transition in the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B74, 094508 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    C. Fang, H. Yao, W.-F. Tsai, J. Hu, and S. A. Kivelson, Theory of electron nematic order in LaFeAsO, Phys. Rev. B77, 224509 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    C. Xu, M. Müller, and S. Sachdev, Ising and spin orders in the iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B78, 020501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Qi and C

    Y. Qi and C. Xu, Global phase diagram for magnetism and lattice distortion of iron-pnictide materials, Phys. Rev. B80, 094402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    A. J. Millis, Fluctuation-driven first-order behavior near theT= 0two-dimensional stripe to Fermi liquid tran- sition, Phys. Rev. B81, 035117 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Chern, R

    G.-W. Chern, R. M. Fernandes, R. Nandkishore, and A. V. Chubukov, Broken translational symmetry in an emergent paramagnetic phase of graphene, Phys. Rev. B86, 115443 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    J. W. F. Venderbos, Multi-Qhexagonal spin density waves and dynamically generated spin-orbit coupling: Time-reversal invariant analog of the chiral spin density wave, Phys. Rev. B93, 115108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    R. M. Fernandes, S. A. Kivelson, and E. Berg, Vestigial chiral and charge orders from bidirectional spin-density waves: Application to the iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B93, 014511 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Zhang, J

    G. Zhang, J. K. Glasbrenner, R. Flint, I. I. Mazin, and R. M. Fernandes, Double-stage nematic bond or- dering above double stripe magnetism: Application to BaTi2Sb2O, Phys. Rev. B95, 174402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    M. H. Christensen, P. P. Orth, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Emergent magnetic degeneracy in iron pnictides due to the interplay between spin-orbit cou- pling and quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 057001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    M. H. Fischer and E. Berg, Fluctuation and strain ef- fects in a chiralp-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Hecker and J

    M. Hecker and J. Schmalian, Vestigial nematic order and superconductivity in the doped topological insula- tor CuxBi2Se3, npj Quantum Mater.3, 26 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    S.-K. Jian, Y. Huang, and H. Yao, Charge-4esuper- conductivity from nematic superconductors in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 227001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    R. M. Fernandes and L. Fu, Charge-4esuperconduc- tivity from multicomponent nematic pairing: Applica- tion to twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 047001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Garaud and E

    J. Garaud and E. Babaev, Effective model and magnetic properties of the resistive electron quadrupling state, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 087602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Hecker, R

    M. Hecker, R. Willa, J. Schmalian, and R. M. Fernan- des,Cascadeofvestigialordersintwo-componentsuper- 26 conductors: Nematic, ferromagnetic,s-wave charge-4e, andd-wave charge-4estates, Phys. Rev. B107, 224503 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    P. T. How and S. K. Yip, Absence of Ginzburg-Landau mechanism for vestigial order in the normal phase above a two-component superconductor, Phys. Rev. B107, 104514 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    P. T. How and S. K. Yip, Broken time reversal symme- try vestigial state for a two-component superconductor in two spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B110, 054519 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    P. P. Poduval and M. S. Scheurer, Vestigial singlet pair- ing in a fluctuating magnetic triplet superconductor and its implications for graphene superlattices, Nat. Com- mun.15, 1713 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Lin, F.-F

    T.-Y. Lin, F.-F. Song, and G.-M. Zhang, Theory of the charge-6econdensed phase in kagome-lattice supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B111, 054508 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Verghis, D

    Y. Verghis, D. Sedov, J. Weßling, P. P. Poduval, and M. S. Scheurer, Vestigial pairing from fluctuating mag- netism and triplet superconductivity, arXiv:2510.02474 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Maccari, E

    I. Maccari, E. Babaev, and J. Carlström, Revisiting vestigial order in nematic superconductors: Gauge-field mechanisms and model constraints, Phys. Rev. B113, 014501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  53. [53]

    Zou, Z.-Q

    X. Zou, Z.-Q. Wan, and H. Yao, Emergence of charge- 4esuperconductivity from 2D nematic superconductors, arXiv:2510.26720 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    C.-T. Gao, C. Lu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Pan, and F. Yang, Charge-4e/6esuperconductivity and chiral metal from 3D chiral superconductor, arXiv:2604.12328 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Himeda, T

    A. Himeda, T. Kato, and M. Ogata, Stripe states with spatially oscillatingd-wave superconductivity in the two-dimensionalt−t ′−Jmodel, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 117001 (2002)

    work page 2002

  56. [56]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, E.-A. Kim, S. A. Kivelson, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, and S. C. Zhang, Dy- namical layer decoupling in a stripe-ordered high-Tc su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 127003 (2007)

    work page 2007

  57. [57]

    D. F. Agterberg and H. Tsunetsugu, Dislocations and vortices in pair-density-wave superconductors, Nat. Phys.4, 639 (2008)

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Theory of the striped superconductor, Phys. Rev. B79, 064515 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Charge-4esu- perconductivity from pair-density-wave order in certain high-temperature superconductors, Nat. Phys.5, 830 (2009)

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tran- quada, Striped superconductors: How spin, charge and superconducting orders intertwine in the cuprates, New J. Phys.11, 115004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Loder, S

    F. Loder, S. Graser, A. P. Kampf, and T. Kopp, Mean- field pairing theory for the charge-stripe phase of high- temperature cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 187001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Y. Wang, D. F. Agterberg, and A. Chubukov, Coexis- tence of charge-density-wave and pair-density-wave or- ders in underdoped cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 197001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    Wu and Y

    Y.-M. Wu and Y. Wang,d-wave charge-4esuperconduc- tivity from fluctuating pair density waves, npj Quantum Materials9, 66 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Z. Pan, C. Lu, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Frustrated su- perconductivity and sextetting order, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 287412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Huecker and Y

    E. Huecker and Y. Wang, Vestigiald-wave charge-4e superconductivity from bidirectional pair density waves, Phys. Rev. B113, 045121 (2026)

    work page 2026

  66. [66]

    Borisov, R

    V. Borisov, R. M. Fernandes, and R. Valentí, Evo- lution fromB 2g nematics toB 1g nematics in heav- ily hole-doped iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 146402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Mukhopadhyay, R

    S. Mukhopadhyay, R. Sharma, C. K. Kim, S. D. Ed- kins, M. H. Hamidian, H. Eisaki, S. ichi Uchida, E.-A. Kim, M. J. Lawler, A. P. Mackenzie, J. C. S. Davis, and K. Fujita, Evidence for a vestigial nematic state in the cuprate pseudogap phase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 13249 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Grinenko, D

    V. Grinenko, D. Weston, F. Caglieris, C. Wuttke, C. Hess, T. Gottschall, I. Maccari, D. Gorbunov, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, A. Rydh, K. Kihou, C.- H. Lee, R. Sarkar, S. Dengre, J. Garaud, A. Char- nukha, R. Hühne, K. Nielsch, B. Büchner, H.-H. Klauss, and E. Babaev, State with spontaneously broken time- reversal symmetry above the superconducting phase ...

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    Yonezawa, Nematic superconductivity in doped Bi2Se3 topological superconductors, Condens

    S. Yonezawa, Nematic superconductivity in doped Bi2Se3 topological superconductors, Condens. Matter4, 2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    C.-w. Cho, J. Shen, J. Lyu, O. Atanov, Q. Chen, S. H. Lee, Y. S. Hor, D. J. Gawryluk, E. Pomjakushina, M. Bartkowiak, M. Hecker, J. Schmalian, and R. Lortz, Z3-vestigial nematic order due to superconducting fluc- tuations in the doped topological insulators NbxBi2Se3 and CuxBi2Se3, Nat. Commun.11, 3056 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    S. Seo, X. Wang, S. M. Thomas, M. C. Rahn, D. Carmo, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, R. D. dos Reis, M. Janoschek, J. D. Thompson, R. M. Fernandes, and P. F. S. Rosa, Nematic state in CeAuSb2, Phys. Rev. X10, 011035 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Q. Yuan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Nematicityandcompetingorders in superconducting magic-angle graphene, Science372, 264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Z. Ni, D. S. Antonenko, W. J. Meese, Q. Tian, N. Huang, A. V. Haglund, M. Cothrine, D. G. Man- drus, R. M. Fernandes, J. W. F. Venderbos, and L. Wu, Signatures ofZ 3 vestigial Potts-nematic order in van der Waals antiferromagnets, arXiv:2308.07249 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Hwangbo, E

    K. Hwangbo, E. Rosenberg, J. Cenker, Q. Jiang, H. Wen, D. Xiao, J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Strain tuning of vestigial three-state Potts nematicity in a correlated antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.20, 1888 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Z. Sun, G. Ye, C. Zhou, M. Huang, N. Huang, X. Xu, Q. Li, G. Zheng, Z. Ye, C. Nnokwe, L. Li, H. Deng, L. Yang, D. Mandrus, Z. Y. Meng, K. Sun, C. R. Du, R. He, and L. Zhao, Dimensionality crossover to a two-dimensional vestigial nematic state from a three- dimensional antiferromagnet in a honeycomb van der Waals magnet, Nat. Phys.20, 1764 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, A. Wang, J. Shen, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Charge-4eand charge-6e flux quantization and higher charge superconductivity in kagome superconductor ring devices, Phys. Rev. X 27 14, 021025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Loison and P

    D. Loison and P. Simon, Monte Carlo analysis of the phase transitions in the two-dimensionalJ 1−J2 XY model, Phys. Rev. B61, 6114 (2000)

    work page 2000

  78. [78]

    Weber, L

    C. Weber, L. Capriotti, G. Misguich, F. Becca, M. Elha- jal, and F. Mila, Ising transition driven by frustration in a 2D classical model with continuous symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 177202 (2003)

    work page 2003

  79. [79]

    Kamiya, N

    Y. Kamiya, N. Kawashima, and C. D. Batista, Dimen- sional crossover in the quasi-two-dimensional Ising-O(3) model, Phys. Rev. B84, 214429 (2011)

    work page 2011

  80. [80]

    T. A. Bojesen, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Phase tran- sitions and anomalous normal state in superconductors with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B89, 104509 (2014)

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.