pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11714 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.RO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Introducing Environmental Constraints to Grasping Strategies for Paper-Like Flexible Materials Using a Soft Gripper

Yi Dong , Yang Li , Jinjun Duan , Zhendong Dai
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords soft gripperflexible materialsgrasping strategiesenvironmental constraintsrobotic manipulationpaper-like objectskinematic models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Environmental constraints allow a soft gripper to grasp paper-like sheets through defined strategies and models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops grasping strategies for paper-like flexible materials that use contact with nearby surfaces to support and guide the sheet rather than relying on the gripper alone. It defines several strategies from basic manipulation primitives, derives their mechanical and kinematic models, and tests grasping force and success rates across materials and conditions. If these strategies work, robots could manage thin sheets in household or service tasks where direct grasping often fails due to compression sensitivity. The work identifies the workspace size and performance trade-offs of each approach so that a suitable one can be chosen for a given task.

Core claim

The authors proposed systematic grasping strategies for flexible materials by exploiting environmental constraints and analyzed their mechanical and kinematic models. An evaluation system measured grasping force and success rate under varying materials and conditions. The strategies were shown to produce distinct workspaces and characteristics that satisfy different task requirements, enabling applications such as household service robots handling planar flexible objects.

What carries the argument

Environmental constraints used as supports and guides together with the soft gripper's deformation to manipulate thin sheets through defined contact sequences.

If this is right

  • Each strategy occupies a distinct workspace that can be selected according to the available space and task geometry.
  • Grasping force and success rate change predictably with material stiffness and surface friction, allowing pre-task calibration.
  • The same constraint-based approach extends to other planar flexible objects once their deformation properties are measured.
  • Kinematic models supply the required contact points and gripper motions, reducing trial-and-error in deployment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adding fixed environmental features to a robot's workspace could simplify grasping of other delicate thin materials such as films or foils.
  • Combining the strategies with contact-force sensing would allow real-time adjustment when surface conditions deviate from the model.
  • The workspace characterizations suggest that mobile robots could carry or deploy temporary constraint surfaces to expand their effective grasping range.

Load-bearing premise

Environmental surfaces can be positioned and contacted reliably without introducing uncontrolled friction or deformation that would invalidate the kinematic models for real-world paper-like sheets.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which the gripper follows one of the proposed strategies yet the sheet slips or buckles on the surface, producing success rates below the reported levels, would show the models do not hold under realistic contact conditions.

read the original abstract

Robotic manipulation of flexible objects is widely required in both industrial and service applications. Among such objects, paper-like materials exhibit distinct mechanical characteristics compared to cloth, being more sensitive to compressive stress, where minor variations in physical properties can significantly affect grasping. This study systematically investigates grasping strategies for paper-like materials using a universal soft gripper by exploiting environmental constraints. Based on manipulation primitives employed in existing grasping strategies, we proposed systematic grasping strategies for flexible materials by exploiting environmental constraints and analyzed their mechanical and kinematic models. To investigate the influence of materials and working conditions on grasping, an evaluation system for measuring grasping force and success rate was defined and experimentally evaluated. Finally, we summarized the specific workspaces and characteristics of different strategies that can satisfy various task requirements and lead to potential applications in household service robots for grasping planar flexible objects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes systematic grasping strategies for paper-like flexible materials using a universal soft gripper by exploiting environmental constraints. Building on standard manipulation primitives, it analyzes the associated mechanical and kinematic models, defines an evaluation system to measure grasping force and success rate, and reports experimental results on the influence of material properties and working conditions. The paper concludes by summarizing the workspaces and characteristics of the different strategies for various task requirements in household service robotics.

Significance. If the experimental results and model validity hold, the work could provide practical value for robotic handling of delicate planar objects by offering a structured way to select strategies based on environmental constraints and quantified workspaces. The emphasis on paper-like materials' sensitivity to compression distinguishes it from cloth-focused manipulation literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental evaluation] The central claim that the proposed strategies are systematic and supported by valid mechanical/kinematic models rests on experimental evaluation, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative results, error bars, statistical analysis, or data-exclusion criteria (see the evaluation-system description and results summary). This makes it impossible to assess whether success-rate predictions transfer to real paper sheets.
  2. [Mechanical and kinematic models] The kinematic models treat environmental contacts as ideal constraints, but the paper notes that paper-like materials are sensitive to minor property variations and compressive stress. No quantification of friction coefficients, slip thresholds, or local deformation limits is given, so the workspace summaries may not remain valid under realistic contact conditions (see the model-analysis and skeptic concern on uncontrolled friction/deformation).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that strategies were 'proposed' and 'analyzed' but does not name the specific primitives or list the key workspace characteristics; adding one sentence with concrete examples would improve clarity.
  2. [Evaluation system] Notation for the evaluation metrics (force, success rate) should be defined consistently when first introduced in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our experimental validation and model assumptions. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental evaluation] The central claim that the proposed strategies are systematic and supported by valid mechanical/kinematic models rests on experimental evaluation, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative results, error bars, statistical analysis, or data-exclusion criteria (see the evaluation-system description and results summary). This makes it impossible to assess whether success-rate predictions transfer to real paper sheets.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative rigor is needed to fully support transferability claims. The revised manuscript adds error bars (standard deviation from 20+ trials per condition) to all success-rate and force plots, includes statistical analysis (t-tests and ANOVA with p-values), and specifies data-exclusion criteria (e.g., trials discarded for visible material defects or sensor noise exceeding 5%). These updates confirm that the reported success rates (typically 85-95%) are reproducible and support the model predictions for real paper sheets. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Mechanical and kinematic models] The kinematic models treat environmental contacts as ideal constraints, but the paper notes that paper-like materials are sensitive to minor property variations and compressive stress. No quantification of friction coefficients, slip thresholds, or local deformation limits is given, so the workspace summaries may not remain valid under realistic contact conditions (see the model-analysis and skeptic concern on uncontrolled friction/deformation).

    Authors: The models use ideal constraints as a baseline for workspace derivation, which is standard for initial analysis. We acknowledge the need for realism given material sensitivity. The revision adds measured friction coefficients (0.28-0.55 range, obtained via separate pull tests on paper-surface pairs), explicit slip thresholds tied to compressive stress limits from material datasheets and experiments, and local deformation bounds based on the soft gripper's compliance (quantified via indentation tests). These additions are now integrated into the model-analysis section and workspace summaries. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper grounds its grasping strategies in existing manipulation primitives from prior literature, then analyzes mechanical and kinematic models before experimental validation of force and success rates. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional renaming; the models treat environmental contacts as external geometric constraints rather than internally fitted quantities. The derivation remains self-contained against standard robotics benchmarks and does not invoke author-specific theorems to force the outcome.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from soft-robotics grasping literature plus the untested premise that environmental surfaces provide stable, repeatable constraints without material damage.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Environmental surfaces can be treated as rigid kinematic constraints during grasp execution.
    Invoked when defining manipulation primitives that rely on contact with external geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1035 out tokens · 48877 ms · 2026-05-13T05:59:52.026691+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Xu, X., Deng, H., Zhang, Y., & Yi, N. (2025). Model-based stiffness estimation of grasped objects for underactuated prosthetic ha nds with- out contact sensors. Journal of Bionic Engineering , 22 (5), 2444–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-025-00767-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s42235-025-00767-9 2025

  2. [2]

    Wang, J., Xiong, X., & Gorb, S.N. (2024). A learning-based contro l framework for fast and accurate manipulation of a flexible object. Journal of Bionic Engineering , 21 (4), 1761–1774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-024-00534-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s42235-024-00534-2 2024

  3. [3]

    Namiki, A., & Yokosawa, S. (2015). Robotic origami folding with dynamic motion primitives. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Hamburg, Germany, 2015, 5623–5628. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7354175

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7354175 2015

  4. [4]

    Namiki, A., & Yokosawa, S. (2021). Origami folding by multifingered hands with motion primitives. Cyborg and Bionic Systems , 2021, 9851834. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9851834

    work page doi:10.34133/2021/9851834 2021

  5. [5]

    Wang, J., Shen, J., Yao, X., & Zhang, F. (2023). Research progr ess of automatic grasping methods for garment fabrics. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 35 (6), 997–1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-05-2023-0068

    work page doi:10.1108/ijcst-05-2023-0068 2023

  6. [6]

    Koivikko, A., Drotlef, D.-M., Dayan, C.B., Sariola, V., & Sitti, M. (2021 ). 3d-printed pneumatically controlled soft suction cups for gripping f rag- ile, small, and rough objects. Advanced Intelligent Systems , 3 (9), 2100034. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202100034

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202100034 2021

  7. [7]

    Chin, L., Barscevicius, F., Lipton, J., & Rus, D. (2020). Multiplexed manip- ulation: Versatile multimodal grasping via a hybrid soft gripper. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Paris, France, 2020, 8949–8955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196626

    work page doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196626 2020

  8. [8]

    Balkcom, D.J., & Mason, M.T. (2008). Robotic origami folding. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 27 (5), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836490809023

    work page doi:10.1177/027836490809023 2008

  9. [9]

    Tanaka, K., Kamotani, Y., & Yokokohji, Y. (2007). Origami fold- ing by a robotic hand. 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , San Diego, USA, 2007, 2540–2547. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2007.4399358

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2007.4399358 2007

  10. [10]

    Elbrechter, C., Haschke, R., & Ritter, H. (2012). Folding paper with anthropomor- phic robot hands using real-time physics-based modeling. 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots , Osaka, Japan, 2012, 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2012.6651522 23

    work page doi:10.1109/humanoids.2012.6651522 2012

  11. [11]

    Jiang, C., Nazir, A., Abbasnejad, G., & Seo, J. (2019). Dynamic fl ex-and-flip manipulation of deformable linear objects. 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Macau, China, 2019, 3158–3163. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968161

    work page doi:10.1109/iros40897.2019.8968161 2019

  12. [12]

    Teeple, C.B., Werfel, J., & Wood, R.J. (2022). Multi-dimensional co mpliance of soft grippers enables gentle interaction with thin, flexible objects. 2022 Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation , Philadelphia, USA, 2022, 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9812324

    work page doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812324 2022

  13. [13]

    F., Do, T.T., & Luo, S

    Jiang, J., Zhang, X., Gomes, D. F., Do, T.T., & Luo, S. (2025). Rot ipbot: Robotic handling of thin and flexible objects using rotatable tactile sensors. IEEE Trans- actions on Robotics , 41, 3684–3702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2025.3576951

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2025.3576951 2025

  14. [14]

    Xiong, Z., Guo, Z., Yuan, L., Su, Y., Liu, Y., & Lipson, H. (2023). Ra pid grasp- ing of fabric using bionic soft grippers with elastic instability. 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Detroit, USA, 2023, 6449–6455. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS55552.2023.10341428

    work page doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10341428 2023

  15. [15]

    Yoshimi, T., Iwata, N., Mizukawa, M., & Ando, Y. (2012). Picking up operation of thin objects by robot arm with two-fingered parallel soft grippe r. 2012 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts , Munich, Germany, 2012, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2012.6213390

    work page doi:10.1109/arso.2012.6213390 2012

  16. [16]

    Hirai, S., Wakamatsu, H., & Iwata, K. (1994). Modeling of deform able thin parts for their manipulation. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , San Diego, USA, 1994, 2955–2960. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1994.350890

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.1994.350890 1994

  17. [17]

    Wakamatsu, H., & Hirai, S. (2004). Static modeling of linear objec t deformation based on differential geometry. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 23 (3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836490404188

    work page doi:10.1177/027836490404188 2004

  18. [18]

    Kristek, S.M., & Shell, D.A. (2012). Orienting deformable polygona l parts without sensors. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Vilamoura, Portugal, 2012, 973–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6386165

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6386165 2012

  19. [19]

    Srinivasa, S.S., Baker, C.R., Sacks, E., Reshko, G.B., Mason, M.T., & Erdmann, M.A. (2002). Experiments with nonholonomic manipulation. Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Washington USA, 2002, 2042–2047. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1014841

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.2002.1014841 2002

  20. [20]

    Mason, M.T., Pai, D.K., Rus, D., Taylor, L.R., & Erdmann, M.A. (1999). A mobile manipulator. Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation , Detroit, USA, 1999, 2322–2327. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1999.770452 24

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.1999.770452 1999

  21. [21]

    Zhao, C., Jiang, C., Cai, J., Wang, M.Y., Yu, H., & Chen, Q. (2023). F lipbot: Learning continuous paper flipping via coarse-to-fine exterocept ive-proprioceptive exploration. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02253

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.02253 2023

  22. [22]

    Zheng, Y., Veiga, F.F., Peters, J., & Santos, V.J. (2022). Auton omous learning of page flipping movements via tactile feedback. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 38 (5), 2734–2749. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2022.3168731

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2022.3168731 2022

  23. [23]

    Choi, A., Tong, D., Terzopoulos, D., Joo, J., & Jawed, M. K. (2025 ). Learn- ing neural force manifolds for sim2real robotic symmetrical paper folding. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , 22, 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2024.3366909

    work page doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3366909 2025

  24. [24]

    Guo, Y., Jiang, X., & Liu, Y. (2021). Deformation control of a de formable object based on visual and tactile feedback. 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Confer- ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Prague, Czech Republic, 2021, 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636157

    work page doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636157 2021

  25. [25]

    Dong, Y., Duan, J., Liu, Y., Dai, Z., & Manoonpong, P. (2023). Rob otic shoe packaging strategies based on a single soft-gripper system and ex trinsic resources. 2023 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mec hatronics, Sanya, China, 469–475. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARM58088.2023.10218977

    work page doi:10.1109/icarm58088.2023.10218977 2023

  26. [26]

    Zhang, Q., Hu, Z., Koyama, K., Wan, W., & Harada, K. (2022). Pry ing grasp for picking thin object using thick fingertips. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 7 (4), 11577–11584. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3202638

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3202638 2022

  27. [27]

    He, T., Aslam, S., Tong, Z., & Seo, J. (2021). Scooping manipula- tion via motion control with a two-fingered gripper and its application to bin picking. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 6 (4), 6394–6401. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3093896

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3093896 2021

  28. [28]

    Babin, V., St-Onge, D., & Gosselin, C. (2019). Stable and repeat able grasping of flat objects on hard surfaces using passive and epicyc lic mechanisms. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.06.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2018.06.002 2019

  29. [29]

    Babin, V., & Gosselin, C. (2018). Picking, grasping, or scooping s mall objects lying on flat surfaces: A design approach. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 37 (12), 1484–1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364918802346

    work page doi:10.1177/0278364918802346 2018

  30. [30]

    Odhner, L.U., Ma, R.R., & Dollar, A.M. (2013). Open-loop precision g rasp- ing with underactuated hands inspired by a human manipulation strat egy. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , 10 (3), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2013.2240298 25

    work page doi:10.1109/tase.2013.2240298 2013

  31. [31]

    Odhner, L.U., Ma, R.R., & Dollar, A.M. (2012). Precision grasping an d manipu- lation of small objects from flat surfaces using underactuated fin gers. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Saint Paul, USA, 2012, 2830–2835. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225211

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2012.6225211 2012

  32. [32]

    Yuan, S., Epps, A.D., Nowak, J.B., & Salisbury, J.K. (2020). Design of a roller- based dexterous hand for object grasping and within-hand manipu lation. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Paris, France, 2020, 8870–8876. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197146

    work page doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197146 2020

  33. [33]

    Morino, K., Kikuchi, S., Chikagawa, S., Izumi, M., & Watanabe, T. (2 020). Sheet- based gripper featuring passive pull-in functionality for bin picking an d for picking up thin flexible objects. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 5 (2), 2007–2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2970630

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2020.2970630 2007

  34. [34]

    Ko, T. (2020). A tendon-driven robot gripper with passively sw itch- able underactuated surface and its physics simulation based param eter optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 5 (4), 5002–5009. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.3005131

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2020.3005131 2020

  35. [35]

    Ding, K., Chen, B., Wu, R., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gao, H.a., Li, S., Zhu, Y., Zhou, G., Dong, H. (2024). Preafford: Universal affordance-bas ed pre-grasping for diverse objects and environments. 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 7278–7285. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10802523

    work page doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802523 2024

  36. [36]

    Hang, K., Morgan, A.S., & Dollar, A.M. (2019). Pre-grasp sliding ma nipulation of thin objects using soft, compliant, or underactuated hands. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4 (2), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2892591

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2892591 2019

  37. [37]

    Bimbo, J., Turco, E., Ghazaei Ardakani, M., Pozzi, M., Salvietti, G., Bo, V., Malvezzi, M., & Prattichizzo, D. (2019). Exploiting robot hand complia nce and environmental constraints for edge grasps. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , 6, 135. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00135

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00135 2019

  38. [38]

    Sarantopoulos, I., & Doulgeri, Z. (2018). Human-inspired robo tic grasp- ing of flat objects. Robotics and Autonomous Systems , 108, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.07.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2018.07.005 2018

  39. [39]

    Dafle, N.C., Rodriguez, A., Paolini, R., Tang, B., Srinivasa, S.S., Erdm ann, M., Mason, M.T., Lundberg, I., Staab, H., & Fuhlbrigge, T. (2014). Ex trinsic dexterity: Inhand manipulation with external forces. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Hong Kong, China, 2014, 1578–1585. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907062 26

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907062 2014

  40. [40]

    Sundaram, A.M., Friedl, W., & Roa, M.A. (2020). Environment-awa re grasp strategy planning in clutter for a variable stiffness hand. 2020 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Las Vegas, USA, 2020, 9377–9384. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340689

    work page doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9340689 2020

  41. [41]

    Eppner, C., & Brock, O. (2015). Planning grasp strategies tha t exploit environmental constraints. 2015 IEEE International Confer- ence on Robotics and Automation , Seattle, USA, 2015, 4947–4952. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139886

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139886 2015

  42. [42]

    Eppner, C., Deimel, R., Alvarez-Ruiz, J., Maertens, M., & Brock, O . (2015). Exploitation of environmental constraints in human and ro botic grasping. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 34 (7), 1021–1038. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364914559753

    work page doi:10.1177/0278364914559753 2015

  43. [43]

    Turco, E., Bo, V., Pozzi, M., Rizzo, A., & Prattichizzo, D. (2021). Grasp planning with a soft reconfigurable gripper exploiting embedded and e nviron- mental constraints. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 6 (3), 5215–5222. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3072855

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3072855 2021

  44. [44]

    Chavan-Dafie, N., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). Regrasping by fixtu reless fixturing. 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Scie nce and Engineer- ing, Munich, Germany, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2018.8560381

    work page doi:10.1109/coase.2018.8560381 2018

  45. [45]

    Almeida, D., & Karayiannidis, Y. (2017). Dexterous manipulation w ith com- pliant grasps and external contacts. 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Confer- ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Vancouver, Canada, 2017, 1913–1920. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8206010

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8206010 2017

  46. [46]

    Chavan-Dafle, N., & Rodriguez, A. (2020). Sampling-based plan ning of in-hand manipulation with external pushes. Robotics Research: The 18th International Symposium ISRR , Puerto Varas, Chile, 2020, 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4 39

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4 2020

  47. [47]

    Chavan-Dafle, N., & Rodriguez, A. (2015). Prehensile pushing: In-hand manipulation with push-primitives. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Hamburg, Germany, 2015, 6215–6222. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7354264

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7354264 2015

  48. [48]

    Wan, W., & Harada, K. (2015). Reorientating objects with a grip - ping hand and a table surface. 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots , Seoul, South Korea, 2015, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363538

    work page doi:10.1109/humanoids.2015.7363538 2015

  49. [49]

    Tong, Z., He, T., Kim, C.H., Ng, Y.H., Xu, Q., & Seo, J. (2020). Picking thin objects by tilt-and-pivot manipulation and its application to bin picking . 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Paris, France, 2020, 27 9932–9938. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197493

    work page doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197493 2020

  50. [50]

    Fakhari, A., Patankar, A., & Chakraborty, N. (2021). Motion a nd force plan- ning for manipulating heavy objects by pivoting. 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Prague, Czech Republic, 2021, 9393–9400. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636103

    work page doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636103 2021

  51. [51]

    Hou, Y., Jia, Z., & Mason, M.T. (2018). Fast planning for 3d any- pose-reorienting using pivoting. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , Brisbane, Australia, 2018, 1631–1638. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8462834

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8462834 2018

  52. [52]

    Holladay, A., Paolini, R., & Mason, M.T. (2015). A general framewo rk for open- loop pivoting. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automat ion, Seattle, USA, 2015, 3675–3681. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139709

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139709 2015

  53. [53]

    Specian, A., Mucchiani, C., Yim, M., & Seo, J. (2018). Robotic edge -rolling manipulation: A grasp planning approach. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3 (4), 3137–3144. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2849828

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2849828 2018

  54. [54]

    Borras, J., Alenya, G., & Torras, C. (2020). A grasping-cente red analy- sis for cloth manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 36 (3), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2020.2986921

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2020.2986921 2020

  55. [55]

    Shibata, M., Ota, T., & Hirai, S. (2009). Wiping motion for deforma ble object handling. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automat ion, Kobe, Japan, 2009, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152448

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.2009.5152448 2009

  56. [56]

    Wang, C.Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.Y.M. (2021). Scaled-yolov4 : Scal- ing cross stage partial network. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , Nashville, USA, 2021, 13029–13038. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01283 28

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01283 2021