arxiv: 2605.11737 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Laser-assisted tunneling in a static tungsten diselenide WSe₂ barrier

Rachid El Aitouni , Mohammed El Azar , Clarence Cortes , Pablo D\'iaz , David Laroze , Ahmed Jellal

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

keywords WSe2Floquet theoryKlein tunnelinglaser-assisted tunnelingDirac fermionsquantum transporttransmission suppression

0 comments

The pith

Laser irradiation induces Floquet sidebands that suppress transmission and overcome Klein tunneling in monolayer WSe2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines tunneling of Dirac fermions through a static electrostatic barrier in monolayer WSe2 while a linearly polarized laser field is applied. Floquet theory handles the time-periodic drive to produce analytical wave functions in the three regions, from which transmission and reflection coefficients follow via interface continuity and the Büttiker conductance formula. The laser generates a growing set of sidebands whose strength rises with the driving parameter, causing marked transmission suppression. Wider irradiated regions further renormalize energies and create interference that reduces current even more.

Core claim

Within the Floquet formalism the time-periodic laser drive generates a rich sideband structure in the Dirac-fermion wave functions across the WSe2 barrier. The number and strength of these sidebands increase with the driving parameter α, producing strong interference and energy renormalization that suppress transmission and furnish an efficient mechanism to overcome Klein tunneling.

What carries the argument

Floquet sideband structure arising from the laser field in the three-region Dirac-fermion barrier model.

Load-bearing premise

Monolayer WSe2 electrons are treated as Dirac fermions and the laser is taken to be an ideal time-periodic drive whose only effect on transmission is captured by wave-function continuity at the interfaces.

What would settle it

Conductance measurements that show transmission rising or staying constant as the laser driving parameter α increases would falsify the predicted sideband-induced suppression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11737 by Ahmed Jellal, Clarence Cortes, David Laroze, Mohammed El Azar, Pablo D\'iaz, Rachid El Aitouni.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Transmission as a function of incident angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Transmission as a function of the number of photon exchanged for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Total transmission and transmissions of the first five side bands ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Total transmission and transmissions of the first 5 side bands ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Conductance as a function of barrier width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the tunneling effect of Dirac fermions in a monolayer WSe$_2$ subjected to a static electrostatic barrier and irradiated by a linearly polarized laser field. Within the Floquet formalism, the time-periodic driving is incorporated to derive analytical wave functions across the three regions of the system. By enforcing continuity conditions at the interfaces, we obtain the transmission and reflection coefficients, which are then used to evaluate the conductance via the B\"uttiker approach. Our results reveal that the laser field induces a rich Floquet sideband structure, whose number and strength increase with the driving parameter $\alpha$. This leads to a significant suppression of transmission and provides an efficient mechanism to overcome Klein tunneling. Moreover, increasing the width of the irradiated region enhances the interaction between fermions and the external field, resulting in energy renormalization and the formation of Stark-like confined states. The interaction between several Floquet channels creates strong interference effects, which reduce the transmitted current even further. The results demonstrate that light-matter interaction allows for the dynamic control of quantum transport in WSe$_2$ materials. This technology allows for the development of new optoelectronic devices, including tunable quantum filters and light-controlled nanoscale transistors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives Floquet transmission coefficients for a laser-driven barrier in WSe2 modeled as gapless Dirac fermions and shows sideband-induced suppression, but the gapless assumption does not match the real material.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this calculation applies standard Floquet matching to a three-region electrostatic barrier under linear laser drive in WSe2, producing analytic transmission and conductance via the Büttiker formula, with the driving strength α controlling the number of sidebands and overall suppression. It also notes interference between channels and Stark-like states for wider irradiated regions. These steps are carried out cleanly within the chosen model and give explicit dependence on α and barrier width that could be checked numerically elsewhere.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies laser-assisted tunneling of Dirac fermions through a static electrostatic barrier in monolayer WSe₂. Using Floquet theory for a time-periodic laser drive, it derives analytical wave functions in a three-region geometry (incident, barrier, transmitted), matches them at interfaces to obtain transmission/reflection coefficients, and computes conductance via the Büttiker formula. Key results are that increasing the driving parameter α generates more Floquet sidebands that suppress transmission, providing a mechanism to overcome Klein tunneling, with further suppression from barrier width and inter-channel interference.

Significance. If the model were appropriate, the work would offer an analytical demonstration of dynamic control of tunneling via light-matter interaction in 2D materials, with potential implications for optoelectronic devices. The strength lies in the closed-form Floquet wave functions (Bessel-dressed) and direct application of scattering theory without fitted parameters. However, the central claims rest on an inapplicable dispersion relation, limiting the significance for the stated material.

major comments (2)

[Model/Hamiltonian] Model/Hamiltonian section (prior to Eq. for wave functions): The system is modeled with the gapless Dirac Hamiltonian for WSe₂, omitting the mass term Δσ_z (Δ ≈ 0.8 eV for the ~1.6 eV direct gap). Klein tunneling and its laser-induced suppression are invoked throughout (abstract, results on transmission), but these phenomena require massless Dirac cones with perfect normal-incidence transmission. For gapped WSe₂ at energies below the gap, states are evanescent and the three-region matching yields qualitatively different transmission; the analytic expressions and Büttiker conductance therefore do not apply to the claimed material.
[Results] Results on sideband structure and transmission (discussion of α dependence): The reported increase in sideband number/strength with α and the resulting suppression rely on propagating gapless modes. Inclusion of Δ would modify the wave-vector matching and Floquet channel thresholds, likely eliminating the claimed interference-driven suppression mechanism for realistic tunneling energies; no error estimate or comparison to the gapped case is provided.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the escaped quote in Büttiker should be rendered as Büttiker; minor notation inconsistency in the driving parameter α definition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The identification of the gapless approximation as a central issue is well taken, and we address both major comments below with plans for revision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model/Hamiltonian] Model/Hamiltonian section (prior to Eq. for wave functions): The system is modeled with the gapless Dirac Hamiltonian for WSe₂, omitting the mass term Δσ_z (Δ ≈ 0.8 eV for the ~1.6 eV direct gap). Klein tunneling and its laser-induced suppression are invoked throughout (abstract, results on transmission), but these phenomena require massless Dirac cones with perfect normal-incidence transmission. For gapped WSe₂ at energies below the gap, states are evanescent and the three-region matching yields qualitatively different transmission; the analytic expressions and Büttiker conductance therefore do not apply to the claimed material.

Authors: We agree that the gapless Dirac Hamiltonian is an approximation that does not fully capture the properties of monolayer WSe₂, which has a direct band gap of about 1.6 eV. Our initial approach focused on the Floquet effects in the context of Dirac fermions to highlight the laser-assisted suppression of tunneling, including Klein tunneling. However, as pointed out, for realistic energies below the gap, the inclusion of the mass term is essential as it leads to evanescent waves rather than propagating modes. In the revised manuscript, we will modify the Hamiltonian to include the Δσ_z term, re-derive the Floquet wave functions accordingly, and update the transmission and conductance calculations. We will also add a discussion on the validity range of the gapless approximation, for instance when the Fermi energy is tuned above the gap via doping or gating. This revision will make the results more applicable to the material. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results on sideband structure and transmission (discussion of α dependence): The reported increase in sideband number/strength with α and the resulting suppression rely on propagating gapless modes. Inclusion of Δ would modify the wave-vector matching and Floquet channel thresholds, likely eliminating the claimed interference-driven suppression mechanism for realistic tunneling energies; no error estimate or comparison to the gapped case is provided.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that our analysis of the sideband structure, transmission suppression with increasing α, and the interference effects are based on the gapless dispersion. Incorporating the mass term will indeed alter the dispersion relations, affecting the thresholds for Floquet channels and the nature of the modes (propagating vs. evanescent). We will include a comparison between the gapped and gapless cases in the revised paper, providing quantitative estimates of the differences in transmission probabilities and conductance. This will allow us to assess the robustness of the laser-induced suppression mechanism and clarify under what conditions the effects persist in the gapped system. We believe this will address the concern and enhance the manuscript's rigor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard Floquet wave-matching derivation; fully self-contained with no circular steps

full rationale

The paper applies the Floquet formalism to the time-periodic laser drive on a three-region Dirac barrier, derives analytic wavefunctions (Bessel-dressed), enforces continuity at interfaces to obtain transmission/reflection coefficients, and computes conductance via the Büttiker formula. These steps are direct consequences of the stated model (gapless Dirac fermions + periodic drive) and contain no fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The sideband structure, transmission suppression, and interference effects are computed outputs rather than inputs renamed as predictions. The reference to Klein tunneling follows from the explicit massless-Dirac assumption and does not reduce the derivation to a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the Dirac-fermion description of WSe2 electrons and the applicability of Floquet theory to a time-periodic laser; no new entities are postulated and the only adjustable quantity mentioned is the driving strength α.

free parameters (1)

driving parameter α
Laser intensity parameter whose increase is said to strengthen sidebands and suppression; its concrete values are not fitted in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Electrons in monolayer WSe2 obey the Dirac equation with linear dispersion
Standard modeling choice for transition-metal dichalcogenides invoked to obtain analytic wave functions.
standard math The laser field is a perfect monochromatic time-periodic perturbation treatable by Floquet theory
Core mathematical framework used to generate sideband structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5527 in / 1447 out tokens · 97205 ms · 2026-05-13T05:38:37.318199+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Within the Floquet formalism, the time-periodic driving is incorporated to derive analytical wave functions... ϕ(t)=e^{-i A0/ω sin(ωt)}=∑ J_m(α) e^{-imωt}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Laser-assisted tunneling in a static tungsten diselenide WSe$_2$ barrier

and electronic conductance [37]. Moreover, such ir- radiation can partially suppress Klein tunneling and lead to polarization-dependent transport behavior [39, 57]. Following the success of graphene, new materials have been explored for technological development, particularly transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) [40–42]. The 2D materials display two ch...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[2]

(A15) J r l =v F τ|r l|2(βl +β ∗ l ) (A16) J t l =v F τ|t l|2(βl +β ∗ l ).(A17) From these current densities, the transmission and reflec- tion probabilities are calculated according to the follow- ing expression: Tl = |J t l | |J i 0| =|t l|2, R l = |J r l | |J i 0| =|r l|2.(A18) Because of the Floquet subbands, the transmission also has an infinite numb...

work page
[3]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science 306, 666 (2004)

work page 2004
[4]

K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, Science 353, 9439 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, Z. Jiang, M. Klima, G. Fuden- berg, J. Hone, P. Kim, and H. L. Stormer, Solid State 11 Commun. 351. 146 (2008)

work page 2008
[6]

S. V. Morozov, K. S. Novoselov, M. I. Katsnelson, F. Schedin, D. C. Elias, J. A. Jaszczak, and A. K. Geim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016602 (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature 462, 183 (2009)

work page 2009
[8]

Q. Bao, H. Zhang, B. Wang, Z. Ni, . H. Y. X. Lim, Y. Wang, and K. P. Loh, Nat. Photon 5, 411 (2011)

work page 2011
[9]

G. Gui, J. Li, and J. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 78, 075435 (2008)

work page 2008
[10]

Zheng and T

Y. Zheng and T. Ando, Phys. Rev. B 65, 245420 (2002)

work page 2002
[11]

N. M. R. Peres, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 323201 (2009)

work page 2009
[12]

X. Wang, Y. Ouyang, X. Li, H. Wang, J. Guo, and H. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 206803 (2008)

work page 2008
[13]

Guinea, M

F. Guinea, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. K. Geim, Nat. Phys. 6, 30 (2010)

work page 2010
[14]

G.-X. Ni, Y. Zheng, S. Bae, H. R. Kim, A. Pachoud, Y. S. Kim, C.-L. Tan, D. Im, J.-H. Ahn, B. H. Hong, and B. Ozyilmaz, ACS Nano 6, 1158 (2012)

work page 2012
[15]

T. Ohta, A. Bostwick, T. Seyller, K. Horn, and E. Roten- berg, Science 313, 951 (2006)

work page 2006
[16]

A. N. Sidorov, M. M. Yazdanpanah, R. Jalilian, P. J. Ouseph, R. W. Cohn, and G. U. Sumanasekera, Nan- otechnology 18, 135301 (2007)

work page 2007
[17]

G. A. K. P. A. Giovannetti, P. A. Khomyakov, G. Brocks, V. V. Karpan, J. van den Brink, and P. J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026803 (2008)

work page 2008
[18]

Stander, B

N. Stander, B. Huard, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026807 (2009)

work page 2009
[19]

M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Nat. Phys. 2, 620 (2006)

work page 2006
[20]

C. W. J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1337 (2008)

work page 2008
[21]

Jellal, M

A. Jellal, M. Mekkaoui, E. B. Choubabi, and H. Bahlouli, Eur. Phys. J. B 87, 123 (2014)

work page 2014
[22]

Zhang and N

C. Zhang and N. Tzoar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1982 (1988)

work page 1982
[23]

Ahsan Zeb, K

M. Ahsan Zeb, K. Sabeeh, and M. Tahir, Phys. Rev. B 78, 165420 (2008)

work page 2008
[24]

Li and L

W. Li and L. E. Reichl, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15732 (1999)

work page 1999
[25]

H. P. Ojeda-Collado and C. Rodr´ ıguez-Castellanos, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 3 (2013)

work page 2013
[26]

Dell’Anna and A

L. Dell’Anna and A. De Martino, Phys. Rev. B 79, 045420 (2009)

work page 2009
[27]

Jellal and A

A. Jellal and A. El Mouhafid, J. Phys. A: Math. Theo. 44, 015302 (2011)

work page 2011
[28]

M. R. Masir, P. Vasilopoulos, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 77, 235443 (2008)

work page 2008
[29]

Park and H

S. Park and H. S. Sim, Phys. Rev. B 77, 075433 (2008)

work page 2008
[30]

Biswas and C

R. Biswas and C. Sinha, Appl. Phys. 114, 183706 (2013)

work page 2013
[31]

El Aitouni, M

R. El Aitouni, M. Mekkaoui, A. Jellal, and M. Schreiber, Physica E 157, 115865 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

S. X. Wang, Z. W. Li, J. J. Liu, and Y. X. Li, Chin. Phys. B 20, 077305 (2011)

work page 2011
[33]

El Aitouni, M

R. El Aitouni, M. Mekkaoui, A. Bahaoui, and A. Jellal, Appl. Phys. A 131, 48 (2025)

work page 2025
[34]

El Aitouni, M

R. El Aitouni, M. Mekkaoui, and A. Jellal, Phys. Scr. 99, 065912 (2024)

work page 2024
[35]

Mekkaoui, A

M. Mekkaoui, A. Jellal, and H. Bahlouli, Solid State Communi. 358, 114981 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

S. Das, A. Maity, R. Sarkar, A. Menon, T. Nag, and B. Basu, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 395804 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

Gregefalk, A

A. Gregefalk, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and T. Nag, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 535, 2300295 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

Z. H. Ni, T. Yu, Z. Q. Luo, Y. Y. Wang, L. Liu, C. L. Wong, and Z. X. Shen, Sci. Rep. 2, 20082 (2012)

work page 2012
[39]

Iurov, G

A. Iurov, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205135 (2019)

work page 2019
[40]

Iurov, G

A. Iurov, G. Gumbs, O. Roslyak, and D. Huang,J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 015303 (2012)

work page 2012
[41]

Iurov, L

A. Iurov, L. Zhemchuzhna, D. Dahal, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 101, 035129 (2020)

work page 2020
[42]

Chhowalla, H

M. Chhowalla, H. S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J. Li, K. P. Loh, and H. Zhang, Nature Chemistry 5, 263 (2013)

work page 2013
[43]

Manzeli, D

S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Gillen, and A. Kis, Nature Reviews Materials 2, 17033 (2017)

work page 2017
[44]

D. Xiao, G. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

work page 2012
[45]

Cheng, J

Q. Cheng, J. Pang, D. Sun, J. Wang, S. Zhang, F. Liu, Y. Chen, R. Yang, N. Liang, X. Lu, Y. Ji, J. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Sang, H. Liu, and W. Zhou, InfoMat 2, 656–697 (2020)

work page 2020
[46]

Gmitra and J

M. Gmitra and J. Fabian, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155403 (2015)

work page 2015
[47]

Y. Shen, Z. Zhang, Z. Yao, M. Jin, J. Gao, Y. Zhao, W. Bao, Y. Sun, and H. Tian, Nano-Micro Lett. 191 (2025)

work page 2025
[48]

A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Materials 6, 183 (2007)

work page 2007
[49]

S. Z. Butler, S. M. Hollen, L. Cao, Y. Cui, J. A. Gupta, H. R. Gutierrez, T. F. Heinz, S. S. Hong, J. Huang, A. F. Ismach, E. Johnston-Halperin, M. Kuno, V. V. Plash- nitsa, R. D. Robinson, R. S. Ruoff, S. Salahuddin, J. Shan, L. Shi, M. G. Spencer, M. Terrones, W. Windl, and J. X. Zheng, ACS Nano 7, 2898 (2013)

work page 2013
[50]

Avsar, J

A. Avsar, J. Y. Tan, T. Taychatanapat, J. Balakrishnan, G. K. W. Koon, Y. Yeo, J. Lahiri, A. Carvalho, A. S. Rodin, E. C. T. O’Farrell, G. Eda, A. H. Castro Neto, and B. ¨Ozyilmaz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 021003 (2020)

work page 2020
[51]

Aivazian, Z

G. Aivazian, Z. Gong, A. M. Jones, R.-L. Chu, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, C. Zhang, D. Cobden, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nat. Phys. 11, 148 (2015)

work page 2015
[52]

Srivastava, M

A. Srivastava, M. Sidler, A. V. Allain, D. S. Lembke, A. Kis, and A. Imamo˘glu, Nat. Phys. 11, 141 (2015)

work page 2015
[53]

L. H. F. Koppens, E. D. Chang, and J. F. Garc´ ıa de Abajo, Nano Letters 11, 3370–3377 (2011)

work page 2011
[54]

M. R. Masir, P. Vasilopoulos, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035409 (2009)

work page 2009
[55]

Buttiker, Y

M. Buttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas. Phys. Rev. B 31, 6207 (1985)

work page 1985
[56]

Chen and J

X. Chen and J. W. Tao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 262102 (2009)

work page 2009
[57]

J. E. Stalnaker, D. Budker, S. J. Freedman, J. S. Guz- man, S. M. Rochester, and V. V. Yashchuk. Phys. Rev. A 73, 043416 (2006)

work page 2006
[58]

Kristinsson, O

K. Kristinsson, O. V. Kibis, S. Morina, and I. A. Shelykh, Sci. Rep. 6, 20082 (2016)

work page 2016
[59]

Iurov, G

A. Iurov, G. Gumbs, O. Roslyak, and D. Huang, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 015303 (2012)

work page 2012
[60]

Iurov, L

A. Iurov, L. Zhemchuzhna, D. Dahal, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115309 (2022)

work page 2022
[61]

Iurov, L

A. Iurov, L. Zhemchuzhna, P. Fekete, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043245 (2020)

work page 2020
[62]

D. Le, T. C. Berkelbach, F. Zhang, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reichman, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 27, 182201 (2015)

work page 2015
[63]

Yang, Universit´ e de Lorraine (2024)

W. Yang, Universit´ e de Lorraine (2024)

work page 2024
[64]

Sinha and R

C. Sinha and R. Biswas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 183706 (2012). 12

work page 2012
[65]

Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (3rd ed., Ox- ford University Press Inc., New York, 2000)

R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (3rd ed., Ox- ford University Press Inc., New York, 2000)

work page 2000
[66]

Reich, J

S. Reich, J. Maultzsch, C. Thomsen, and P. Ordejon, Phys. Rev. B 66, 035412 (2002)

work page 2002
[67]

Tahir, P

M. Tahir, P. M. Krstaji´ c, and P. Vasilopoulos, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235402 (2017)

work page 2017
[68]

Peierls, Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen, Z

R. Peierls, Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen, Z. Phys. 80, 763 (1933)

work page 1933
[69]

Biswas and C

R. Biswas and C. Sinha, Sci. Rep. 11, 2881 (2021)

work page 2021
[70]

El Aitouni, M

R. El Aitouni, M. Mekkaoui, and A. Jellal, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 535, 2200630 (2023)

work page 2023
[71]

R. O. Kuzian, D. V. Efremov, and E. E. Krasovskii. Phys. Rev. Research 7, 013180 (2025)

work page 2025
[72]

D. K. Nandy and T. Sowi´ nski, Phys. Rev. A 100, 023617 (2019)

work page 2019
[73]

Dajka, Entropy 26, 449 (2024)

J. Dajka, Entropy 26, 449 (2024)

work page 2024