pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11795 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Recognition: no theorem link

Observer-Based Fixed-Time Nested Sliding-Mode Control for Tip-Position Regulation of a Single-Link Flexible Manipulator

Atul Sharma, Chayan Kumar Paul, S. Janardhanan

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords flexible manipulatorsliding mode controlfixed-time controlstate observertip position regulationterminal sliding moderobust control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fixed-time sliding mode observer combined with nested terminal controller regulates tip position of single-link flexible manipulator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a composite strategy using a fixed-time sliding mode observer to estimate unmeasured states such as link deflection and velocity, paired with a nested non-singular terminal sliding mode controller that drives the tip to the desired position. This combination is shown through stability analysis to deliver convergence in a fixed time independent of initial conditions while remaining robust to bounded disturbances. The approach is validated in numerical simulations demonstrating accuracy and speed, with comparisons to other methods, and further confirmed via hardware experiments on a real manipulator setup. Precise fixed-time regulation matters for tasks where flexible arms must meet strict timing without excessive vibration or overshoot.

Core claim

The authors establish that the observer-based nested non-singular terminal sliding mode control scheme guarantees fixed-time convergence of the tip-position error to zero for the single-link flexible manipulator, with the observer providing accurate estimates of unmeasured states in fixed time and the composite closed-loop system exhibiting robust finite-time stability properties.

What carries the argument

The nested non-singular terminal sliding mode controller combined with the fixed-time sliding mode observer, which together address the underactuated flexible dynamics and unmeasurable states.

If this is right

  • The tip position converges to the target in a fixed time independent of initial conditions.
  • Estimation errors for unmeasured states converge within the same fixed time.
  • The closed-loop system maintains stability and performance under bounded disturbances.
  • Numerical and experimental results indicate improved accuracy and convergence speed over compared state-of-the-art schemes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nested structure could extend to multi-link flexible manipulators by adding further sliding surfaces for additional degrees of freedom.
  • The fixed-time property supports predictable cycle times in automated manufacturing sequences involving flexible arms.
  • Testing under varying payload masses would reveal how sensitive the fixed-time bound remains to parameter changes.

Load-bearing premise

The manipulator dynamics are known accurately enough to design both the observer and controller, and real disturbances remain within the bounds assumed for fixed-time convergence.

What would settle it

A hardware experiment on the real manipulator where the tip-position error fails to reach zero within the designed fixed time when disturbances exceed the assumed bounds or when the model parameters deviate substantially from those used in design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11795 by Atul Sharma, Chayan Kumar Paul, S. Janardhanan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of Single Link Flexible Manipulator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Output Plots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: States Plot for Original System [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: States and Observer Comparison [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sliding Variable Plots 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows time responses of the higher-order system states under the proposed control, including the CoM angle and velocity, as well as the first and second vibratory modes and their derivatives. The flexible modes and their rates exhibit bounded oscillations during the transient phase and converge rapidly to the vicinity of zero within approximately 3 sec, indicating effective suppression of vibration dynamic… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sliding Variable Comparison Plot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Control Input Plot control activity. The reduced oscillatory content and bounded amplitude of the proposed control indicate improved control smoothness and reduced actuator stress. 5 Experimental Validation This section details the experimental validation of the proposed control strategy. The controller is implemented and evaluated on the Rotary Flexible Link setup developed by Quanser Inc., as described i… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Complete hardware experimental set-up comprising the flexible link, host system, power amplifier, and data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Experimental time responses of the servo angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a novel position control strategy for a single-link flexible manipulator, tailored for applications where precise position must be achieved within strict time constraints. To accomplish this objective, firstly, a nested non-singular terminal sliding mode controller is designed for the system, enabling precise and robust control. Furthermore, a fixed-time sliding mode observer is designed to estimate unmeasured system states accurately in a fixed time, thereby enabling closed-loop control implementation. A stability analysis is presented to guarantee the robustness and efficacy of the proposed composite control algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed fixed-time controller is demonstrated through numerical simulation on accuracy, stability, and convergence speed. The proposed controller's performance is also compared with that of other state-of-the-art control schemes. The proposed controller is further validated through experiments conducted on a real hardware setup.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a composite control scheme for tip-position regulation of a single-link flexible manipulator consisting of a fixed-time sliding-mode observer for estimating unmeasured states and a nested non-singular terminal sliding-mode controller. It presents a Lyapunov-based stability analysis claiming fixed-time convergence and robustness to disturbances, supported by numerical simulations (including comparisons to other state-of-the-art schemes) and hardware experiments on a physical setup.

Significance. If the stability analysis rigorously establishes fixed-time convergence without circular reliance on exact parameter knowledge or overly conservative disturbance bounds, the work would add a practical contribution to time-constrained robust control of flexible systems. The inclusion of both simulation comparisons and hardware validation strengthens the practical relevance, though the overall significance is limited by the standard nature of the nested NTSMC + fixed-time observer combination in the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Stability Analysis] The stability analysis (typically in the section following the controller/observer design) relies on a priori bounds on lumped disturbances (including unmodeled flexible dynamics, friction, and external torques) and exact knowledge of inertia, stiffness, and damping parameters for both observer and controller gain selection. For a flexible manipulator, which is governed by a distributed-parameter PDE, it is unclear whether the fixed-time property is proven for the infinite-dimensional model or only a finite-mode approximation; if the latter, higher-order modes could violate the assumed bounds and reduce the result to ultimate boundedness. Please specify the exact model used in the Lyapunov analysis and the explicit disturbance bound assumptions (e.g., |d(t)| ≤ D).
  2. [Observer Design] The fixed-time observer design assumes the manipulator dynamics are known sufficiently well to compute the observer gains and ensure the fixed-time estimation error convergence. This assumption is load-bearing for the composite closed-loop claim; if parameter uncertainties exceed the modeled bounds, the separation principle used for the observer-based controller may not hold. Clarify how modeling errors in the single-link flexible dynamics are accounted for in the observer error dynamics.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from including at least one quantitative performance metric (e.g., settling time or steady-state error) from the simulations or experiments to substantiate the claims of accuracy and convergence speed.
  2. Ensure all figures (simulation trajectories and hardware results) include clear legends, axis labels with units, and direct visual comparison to the competing controllers mentioned in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. These have prompted us to strengthen the presentation of the model assumptions and robustness properties. In the revised version we will explicitly state that the analysis applies to the finite-dimensional truncation, provide the disturbance bound used, and clarify the treatment of modeling errors within the observer error dynamics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Stability Analysis] The stability analysis (typically in the section following the controller/observer design) relies on a priori bounds on lumped disturbances (including unmodeled flexible dynamics, friction, and external torques) and exact knowledge of inertia, stiffness, and damping parameters for both observer and controller gain selection. For a flexible manipulator, which is governed by a distributed-parameter PDE, it is unclear whether the fixed-time property is proven for the infinite-dimensional model or only a finite-mode approximation; if the latter, higher-order modes could violate the assumed bounds and reduce the result to ultimate boundedness. Please specify the exact model used in the Lyapunov analysis and the explicit disturbance bound assumptions (e.g., |d(t)| ≤ D).

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. The Lyapunov analysis is performed on the finite-dimensional model obtained by applying the assumed-modes method to the Euler-Bernoulli PDE and retaining a finite number of modes; the resulting state-space representation is used throughout the controller and observer design. We will add an explicit statement of this truncation (including the number of modes employed in the numerical and experimental sections) together with the precise disturbance assumption |d(t)| ≤ D, where D is a known positive constant that bounds the lumped effect of unmodeled higher modes, friction, and external torques. The fixed-time convergence is therefore guaranteed only for the truncated model; we will also insert a short discussion acknowledging that the full infinite-dimensional system may exhibit only ultimate boundedness when higher modes are excited. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Observer Design] The fixed-time observer design assumes the manipulator dynamics are known sufficiently well to compute the observer gains and ensure the fixed-time estimation error convergence. This assumption is load-bearing for the composite closed-loop claim; if parameter uncertainties exceed the modeled bounds, the separation principle used for the observer-based controller may not hold. Clarify how modeling errors in the single-link flexible dynamics are accounted for in the observer error dynamics.

    Authors: Thank you for raising this point. Modeling errors and parameter uncertainties are absorbed into the lumped disturbance that appears in the observer error dynamics; the fixed-time sliding-mode observer is constructed to be robust to any bounded disturbance satisfying the same |d(t)| ≤ D assumption used in the stability proof. Consequently, the estimation error still converges in fixed time provided the bound holds. We will augment the observer-error section with an explicit decomposition showing how the mismatch between nominal and actual inertia, stiffness, and damping enters the disturbance term, and we will note that the composite closed-loop analysis relies on the finite-time vanishing of the observer error rather than an exact separation principle. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Rigorous fixed-time stability proof for the original infinite-dimensional PDE model without finite-mode truncation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a composite fixed-time observer and nested sliding-mode controller with a stability analysis via Lyapunov methods to guarantee fixed-time convergence. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce any claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a definition or input by construction. The central stability claim is presented as an independent analysis on the system model, with no evidence of self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. This is the expected outcome for a control-theory paper whose proof steps remain external to the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard Lyapunov-based stability arguments for finite-time and fixed-time convergence plus the modeling assumption that the flexible-link dynamics admit a sufficiently accurate state-space representation.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Lyapunov stability theory guarantees finite-time or fixed-time convergence when a suitable Lyapunov function decreases at a prescribed rate.
    Invoked to support the stability analysis of the composite controller-observer system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1155 out tokens · 74522 ms · 2026-05-13T05:35:18.775529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Research on novel wire driving robot ma- nipulator for local industrial production line

    Jianjun Y uan, Weijun Zhang, Jun Tao, Zhicheng Wan, and Zhixia Tang. Research on novel wire driving robot ma- nipulator for local industrial production line. In 2007 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pages 3925–3930. IEEE, 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Robotics in building construction

    Abraham Warszawski and Dwight A Sangrey. Robotics in building construction. Journal of construction engi- neering and management, 111(3):260–280, 1985

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    Advances in flexible robotic manipulator systemspart i: Overview and dynamics modeling methods

    Bai Li, Xinyuan Li, Hejia Gao, and Fei-Y ue Wang. Advances in flexible robotic manipulator systemspart i: Overview and dynamics modeling methods. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Mathematical modeling and trajectory planning of mobile manipulators with flexible links and joints

    Moharam Habibnejad Korayem, HN Rahimi, and A Nikoobin. Mathematical modeling and trajectory planning of mobile manipulators with flexible links and joints. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(7):3229–3244, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Rest-to-rest motion of a one-link flexible arm

    Alessandro De Luca and G Di Giovanni. Rest-to-rest motion of a one-link flexible arm. In 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No. 01TH8556) , volume 2, pages 923–928. IEEE, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    On the dynamic modeling of flexible manipulators

    Donatus Oguamanam, Sr ¯dan Bošnjak, and Nenad Zrni ´c. On the dynamic modeling of flexible manipulators. FME Transactions, 34(4):231–237, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Cable stiffened flexible link manipulator

    Rahul Dixit and R Prasanth Kumar. Cable stiffened flexible link manipulator. In 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , pages 871–876. IEEE, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Advances in flexible robotic manipulator systemspart ii: Planning, control, applications, and perspectives

    Bai Li, Xinyuan Li, Hejia Gao, and Fei-Y ue Wang. Advances in flexible robotic manipulator systemspart ii: Planning, control, applications, and perspectives. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Boundary control for a flexible manipulator based on infinite dimen- sional disturbance observer

    Tingting Jiang, Jinkun Liu, and Wei He. Boundary control for a flexible manipulator based on infinite dimen- sional disturbance observer. Journal of sound and Vibration, 348:1–14, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Sliding mode control of vibration in a single-link flexible arm with parameter variations

    S-B Choi, C-C Cheong, and H-C Shin. Sliding mode control of vibration in a single-link flexible arm with parameter variations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 179(5):737–748, 1995

    work page 1995

  11. [11]

    Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators

    Y ong Feng, Xinghuo Y u, and Zhihong Man. Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators. Automatica, 38(12):2159–2167, 2002

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems

    Andrey Polyakov. Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems. IEEE trans- actions on Automatic Control, 57(8):2106–2110, 2011

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Adaptive fixed-time speed control and position observation for sensorless pmsm control

    Ruiqi Xu, Zhuang Kang, Zhuang Liu, Shun Cai, Y abin Gao, and Jianxing Liu. Adaptive fixed-time speed control and position observation for sensorless pmsm control. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification , 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Design of robust controllers and a nonlinear observer for the control of a single-link flexible robotic manipulator

    NG Chalhoub, GA Kfoury, and BA Bazzi. Design of robust controllers and a nonlinear observer for the control of a single-link flexible robotic manipulator. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 291(1-2):437–461, 2006

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Precise tip-positioning control of a single-link flexible arm using a fractional-order sliding mode controller

    Farzaneh Hamzeh Nejad, Ali Fayazi, Hossein Ghayoumi Zadeh, Hassan Fatehi Marj, and S Hassan Hossein- Nia. Precise tip-positioning control of a single-link flexible arm using a fractional-order sliding mode controller. Journal of Vibration and Control, 26(19-20):1683–1696, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Position control of single-link flexible manipulator: A functional observer based sliding mode approach

    Atul Sharma and S Janardhanan. Position control of single-link flexible manipulator: A functional observer based sliding mode approach. In 2024 European Control Conference (ECC), pages 3684–3689. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Fixed-time nonlinear homogeneous sliding mode approach for robust tracking control of multirotor aircraft: Experimental validation

    Omar Mechali, Limei Xu, Xiaomei Xie, and Jamshed Iqbal. Fixed-time nonlinear homogeneous sliding mode approach for robust tracking control of multirotor aircraft: Experimental validation. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 359(5):1971–2029, 2022

    work page 1971

  18. [18]

    Fixed-time sliding mode observer-based controller for a class of uncertain nonlinear double integrator systems

    Pooyan Alinaghi Hosseinabadi, Ali Soltani Sharif Abadi, Howard Schwartz, Hemanshu Pota, and Saad Mekhilef. Fixed-time sliding mode observer-based controller for a class of uncertain nonlinear double integrator systems. Asian Journal of Control, 25(5):3456–3473, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Designing a fixed-time observer-based adaptive non- singular sliding mode controller for flexible spacecraft

    Erfan Rezaei, Hossein Bolandi, and Mohammad Fathi. Designing a fixed-time observer-based adaptive non- singular sliding mode controller for flexible spacecraft. ISA transactions, 148:32–44, 2024. 15 Running Title for Header

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Linear-quadratic optimal boundary control of a one-link flexible arm

    Andrea Cristofaro, Alessandro De Luca, and Leonardo Lanari. Linear-quadratic optimal boundary control of a one-link flexible arm. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 5(3):833–838, 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    High-precision tip track- ing of a flexible link manipulator using two-time scale adaptive robust control

    Xiaocong Zhu, Jian Cao, Cianyi Y annick, Linyuan Wang, Xinda Shen, and Peng Liu. High-precision tip track- ing of a flexible link manipulator using two-time scale adaptive robust control. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Adaptive intelligent vision-based control of a flexible- link manipulator

    Umesh Kumar Sahu, Dipti Patra, and Bidyadhar Subudhi. Adaptive intelligent vision-based control of a flexible- link manipulator. Electrical Engineering, 105(5):3263–3281, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Deep reinforcement learning with reward shaping for tracking control and vibration suppression of flexible link manip- ulator

    Joshi Kumar Viswanadhapalli, Vinodh Kumar Elumalai, S Shivram, Sweta Shah, and Dhruv Mahajan. Deep reinforcement learning with reward shaping for tracking control and vibration suppression of flexible link manip- ulator. Applied Soft Computing, 152:110756, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Reinforcement learning control of a flexible two-link manipulator: An experimental investigation

    Wei He, Hejia Gao, Chen Zhou, Chenguang Y ang, and Zhijun Li. Reinforcement learning control of a flexible two-link manipulator: An experimental investigation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(12):7326–7336, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Flexible single-link manipulators control based on a full-order transfer function model

    Reza Mohsenipour and Guangjun Liu. Flexible single-link manipulators control based on a full-order transfer function model. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Boundary disturbance observer-based control of a vibrating single- link flexible manipulator

    Zhijia Zhao, Xiuyu He, and Choon Ki Ahn. Boundary disturbance observer-based control of a vibrating single- link flexible manipulator. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , 51(4):2382–2390, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Robust deflection control and analysis of a fishing rod-type flexible robotic manipulator for collaborative robotics

    Prasenjit Sarkhel, Mithilesh K Dikshit, Vimal Kumar Pathak, Kuldeep K Saxena, C Prakash, and Dharam Buddhi. Robust deflection control and analysis of a fishing rod-type flexible robotic manipulator for collaborative robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems , 159:104293, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Comparative study of post-impact motion control of a flexible arm space robot

    Sharmila Kayastha, Jayantha Katupitiya, Garth Pearce, and Asha Rao. Comparative study of post-impact motion control of a flexible arm space robot. European Journal of Control, 69:100738, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Position control of single link flexible manipulator: a functional observer-based output feedback sliding mode approach

    Atul Sharma and S Janardhanan. Position control of single link flexible manipulator: a functional observer-based output feedback sliding mode approach. International Journal of Systems Science , pages 1–12, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Linear system theory and design

    Chi Tsong Chen. Linear system theory and design . Saunders college publishing, 1984

    work page 1984

  31. [31]

    Terminal sliding mode control–an overview

    Xinghuo Y u, Y ong Feng, and Zhihong Man. Terminal sliding mode control–an overview. IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society , 2:36–52, 2020

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Pd control with on-line gravity compensation for robots with flexible links

    Loredana Zollo, Bruno Siciliano, Alessandro De Luca, and Eugenio Guglielmelli. Pd control with on-line gravity compensation for robots with flexible links. In 2007 European Control Conference (ECC) , pages 4365–4370. IEEE, 2007

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Workbook on flexible link experiment for matlab/simulink users

    J Apkarian, P Karam, and M Levis. Workbook on flexible link experiment for matlab/simulink users. Quanser, 2011. 16

    work page 2011