pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11802 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.ins-det

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Systematic Investigation and Suppression of Fluorescence in High-Sensitivity Cavity-Enhanced Raman Gas Sensing

Ivan Zorin, Johannes D. Pedarnig, Markus Brandstetter, Paul Gattinger, Robert Zimmerleiter, Severin Hager-Roiser

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.ins-det
keywords cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopyfluorescence suppressiontrace gas sensingmulti-pass cavityRaman gas analysisdetection limitsoptical noise model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Systematic removal of fluorescent optics in a multi-pass cavity allows cavity-enhanced Raman sensing to detect ambient methane at 2 ppm and other trace gases at parts-per-million levels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that fluorescence from optical elements creates signal-dependent noise that limits how faint a Raman signal can be resolved in gas measurements. The authors address this by mapping fluorescence sources in their cavity-enhanced setup and eliminating them one component at a time. With the background lowered, ambient-air spectra reveal carbon dioxide lines, oxygen and nitrogen overtones, and methane at its natural 2 ppm level. Calibration runs then confirm detection limits of 11 ppm for oxygen, 5 ppm for nitrogen, and 3 ppm for hydrogen in 180-second acquisitions. This matters for any application that needs broadband, multi-species gas analysis at low concentrations without raising laser power.

Core claim

In a cavity-enhanced Raman system built around a 500 mW 532 nm laser and a simple two-mirror multi-pass cavity operated near the concentric condition with up to 45 reflections, a systematic campaign to identify and replace fluorescent optics reduces the fluorescence baseline. A CCD noise model that ties residual fluorescence directly to shot-noise-limited performance, together with ray-tracing simulations of collection efficiency, quantifies the improvement. The resulting instrument resolves weak Raman features in room air, including CO2, O2 and N2 overtones, and ambient CH4 at 2 ppm. Separate calibration sequences for O2 diluted in N2, N2 diluted in O2, and H2 diluted in N2 establish 1-sqrt

What carries the argument

Step-wise elimination of fluorescent optical components, supported by a CCD-specific noise model that links baseline fluorescence levels to measurement noise and by optical simulations of collection efficiency inside the multi-pass cavity.

If this is right

  • Ambient-air spectra become rich enough to show CO2 peaks together with O2 and N2 overtones.
  • Methane at its natural 2 ppm concentration is detectable without preconcentration.
  • Calibration curves yield 3 ppm detection limit for H2, 5 ppm for N2, and 11 ppm for O2 in 180 s acquisitions.
  • Fluorescence mitigation emerges as a practical design lever for field-deployable CERS instruments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Material selection for low-fluorescence optics may improve sensitivity in other Raman or fluorescence-sensitive techniques without requiring higher laser power.
  • The same systematic audit could be repeated at different wavelengths or with resonant cavities to test whether the same classes of fluorescent contaminants dominate.
  • The approach supports more reliable multi-species monitoring in environmental or industrial settings where power and complexity must stay low.

Load-bearing premise

The measured gains in sensitivity are caused chiefly by the removal of fluorescent optics rather than by unrecorded changes in laser stability, beam alignment, or light collection geometry that occurred while the optics were being swapped.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison in which the final non-fluorescent optical train is swapped back to the original fluorescent components while all alignment, laser power, and integration settings are held identical, followed by re-measurement of the same gas samples to check whether detection limits revert to their earlier values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11802 by Ivan Zorin, Johannes D. Pedarnig, Markus Brandstetter, Paul Gattinger, Robert Zimmerleiter, Severin Hager-Roiser.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a Non-resonant two-mirror MPC CERS setup with collinear signal collection. The excitation beam is launched into the MPC (enclosed in a custom gas cell GC) and performs N reflections before exiting the MPC on its input path. Raman scattered photons are separated from the excitation laser at a dichroic mirror and coupled into a round-to-linear multimode fiber after polarization and long-pass filtering. b Typ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a Raman spectrum of laboratory air acquired with 500 ms integration time and averaged 10 times (5 s total). The O2, N2 and H2O vibrational Q-branches are indicated and the inset shows the Raman peaks of CO2. b Per-pixel standard deviation of 100 Raman spectra of laboratory air with 500 ms integration time (blue) and fit using the CCD noise model from Equation 7 (orange). The visibility of Raman features in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evaluation of the collection efficiency in the MPC system with 19 reflections using the optical design and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fluorescence background analysis and minimization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Raman spectrum of laboratory air acquired with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Calibration Curves for a O2 using the Q1 branch at 1557 cm−1 b N2 using the Q1 branch at 2330 cm−1 and c H2 using the Q1(1) transition at 4157 cm−1 for quantification (see also Figures S4 and S5 in the SI). The insets show how LODpred is obtained from the prediction bands (blue) of the calibration. The signal (peak area, represented by blue circles) is obtained by a Gaussian fit. Each measurement point is … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Raman spectroscopy enables broadband, multi-species gas analysis by providing access to an entire vibrational spectrum in a single measurement. However, the sensitivity of gas-phase Raman sensing is often limited by weak signals and fluorescence background from various optical elements that constrain the achievable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) through signal-dependent noise contributions (e.g. shot noise). Here, we present a cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (CERS) gas sensor employing a 500 mW, 532 nm continuous wave (CW) laser and a simple, non-resonant two-mirror multi-pass cavity (MPC) operated at ambient pressure and near the concentric condition, providing up to 45 internal reflections. To quantitatively capture the impact of fluorescence on performance, a CCD-specific noise model was developed that links fluorescenceinduced baseline levels to measurement noise. Complementary optical simulations were employed to assess the signal collection efficiency in the MPC. Through a systematic analysis of fluorescence sources, the background was reduced substantially by step-wise elimination of fluorescent optics. The fluorescence-minimized setup resolves weak Raman signatures in ambient-air spectra, including CO2 peaks, O2 and N2 overtones, and ambient CH4 (2 ppm). Calibration measurements for O2 (diluted in N2), N2 (in O2) and H2 (in N2) demonstrate detection limits of 11 ppm, 5 ppm and 3 ppm, respectively, with a 180 s measurement time. The results highlight fluorescence mitigation as a key design lever for robust, field-oriented CERS instrumentation for trace gas sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (CERS) sensor using a 500 mW 532 nm CW laser and a non-resonant two-mirror multi-pass cavity (MPC) operated near concentricity at ambient pressure with up to 45 reflections. A CCD-specific noise model is developed to relate fluorescence-induced baseline levels to measurement noise, complemented by optical simulations of signal collection efficiency. Systematic step-wise removal of fluorescent optics reduces the background, enabling resolution of weak Raman features in ambient air (including CO2, O2/N2 overtones, and 2 ppm CH4) and calibration-based detection limits of 11 ppm O2 (in N2), 5 ppm N2 (in O2), and 3 ppm H2 (in N2) for 180 s integration times.

Significance. If the reported sensitivity gains are attributable to fluorescence suppression, the work demonstrates a practical, low-cost design lever for improving SNR in broadband Raman gas sensors without requiring resonant enhancement or cryogenic cooling. The CCD noise model and collection-efficiency simulations provide reusable tools for quantifying background-limited performance. The achieved limits at ambient pressure and the demonstration of multi-species ambient-air spectra are relevant for field-deployable trace-gas instrumentation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Systematic analysis of fluorescence sources (and associated results section)] The central claim attributes the reported detection limits and ambient-air spectra primarily to the step-wise elimination of fluorescent optics. However, no quantitative before/after Raman signal amplitudes (for a fixed test gas and fixed alignment) are shown after each optic replacement. Given that the MPC operates near concentricity and is sensitive to mirror spacing, injection alignment, and collection geometry, concurrent changes in intracavity power or collection efficiency cannot be ruled out as contributors to the SNR improvement.
  2. [CCD-specific noise model description] The CCD noise model is used to link reduced baseline to lower noise, but the manuscript does not provide the explicit functional form or fitted parameters relating fluorescence level to the final detection limits. It is therefore unclear whether the quoted limits (11 ppm O2, 5 ppm N2, 3 ppm H2) follow directly from the model or incorporate additional empirical scaling.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures showing ambient-air and calibration spectra] Figure captions should explicitly state integration time, laser power, and gas pressure for each spectrum to allow direct comparison with the calibration data.
  2. [Noise model section] The term 'parameter-free' is used in the noise-model discussion; clarify whether any scaling factors were adjusted to match the experimental baselines.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's relevance. We address each major comment point by point below. Where the comments identify gaps in the presented evidence, we have revised the manuscript to strengthen the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim attributes the reported detection limits and ambient-air spectra primarily to the step-wise elimination of fluorescent optics. However, no quantitative before/after Raman signal amplitudes (for a fixed test gas and fixed alignment) are shown after each optic replacement. Given that the MPC operates near concentricity and is sensitive to mirror spacing, injection alignment, and collection geometry, concurrent changes in intracavity power or collection efficiency cannot be ruled out as contributors to the SNR improvement.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative before-and-after Raman signal amplitudes for each optic replacement would more rigorously isolate the contribution of fluorescence reduction. The replacements were performed sequentially while preserving the near-concentric MPC alignment and monitoring reference Raman signals from a fixed test gas to maintain consistent intracavity power and collection geometry. However, these intermediate signal values were not documented in the original manuscript. In the revised version, we will add a supplementary table and accompanying text in the results section that reports the N2 Q-branch peak amplitudes measured at each major stage of the systematic optic removal. These data confirm that Raman signal levels remained stable (within 5%) while the fluorescence baseline decreased by more than an order of magnitude, supporting that alignment-induced changes were not the dominant factor in the SNR improvement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The CCD noise model is used to link reduced baseline to lower noise, but the manuscript does not provide the explicit functional form or fitted parameters relating fluorescence level to the final detection limits. It is therefore unclear whether the quoted limits (11 ppm O2, 5 ppm N2, 3 ppm H2) follow directly from the model or incorporate additional empirical scaling.

    Authors: The CCD noise model is introduced in the methods section to relate fluorescence baseline to shot-noise-limited performance, but the explicit functional form and parameter values were omitted for brevity. The quoted detection limits were obtained directly from experimental calibration curves in the final fluorescence-minimized configuration. In the revised manuscript, we will insert the complete noise model equation (including the fluorescence-dependent shot-noise term, read noise, and dark current contributions) together with the fitted CCD parameters and the scaling coefficient that connects baseline level to noise variance. This addition will show that the reported limits of 11 ppm O2, 5 ppm N2, and 3 ppm H2 are consistent with the model predictions based on the measured post-suppression baseline, without additional empirical scaling beyond the calibration data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental calibration against external standards

full rationale

The manuscript presents an experimental CERS setup in which fluorescence sources are identified and removed stepwise, with performance quantified by direct calibration measurements of known gas mixtures (O2 in N2, N2 in O2, H2 in N2) yielding stated detection limits. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes defined from the same data. The noise model is described as linking baseline to shot noise but is not shown to be self-referential or load-bearing for the central claims. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on experimental measurements and a custom noise model rather than on new theoretical derivations or postulated entities. No free parameters are fitted to the target detection limits; the 45 reflections and 500 mW power are stated operating conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5606 in / 1253 out tokens · 61797 ms · 2026-05-13T05:12:13.993217+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality

    P. Monks et al. “Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality”. In:Atmospheric Environment43.33 (Oct. 2009), pp. 5268–5350.issn: 13522310.doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021. url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1352231009007109(visited on 09/16/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 2009

  2. [2]

    Multipass Raman gas analyzer for monitoring of atmo- spheric air composition

    D. Petrov, I. Matrosov, and M. Kostenko. “Multipass Raman gas analyzer for monitoring of atmo- spheric air composition”. In:Optics & Laser Technology152 (Aug. 2022), p. 108155.issn: 00303992. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108155.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0030399222003127(visited on 12/12/2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108155.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ 2022

  3. [3]

    Outgassing Environment of Spacecraft: An Overview

    Z. Jiao et al. “Outgassing Environment of Spacecraft: An Overview”. In:IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering611.1 (Oct. 1, 2019), p. 012071.issn: 1757-8981, 1757-899X.doi:10.1088/1757- 899X/611/1/012071.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757- 899X/611/1/ 012071(visited on 02/04/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1757- 2019

  4. [4]

    Application of gas chromatography in food analysis

    S. J. Lehotay and J. Hajšlová. “Application of gas chromatography in food analysis”. In:TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry21.9 (Sept. 2002), pp. 686–697.issn: 01659936.doi:10.1016/S0165-9936(02) 00805- 1.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993602008051(visited on 02/04/2026)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(02 2002

  5. [5]

    Analyses of gas composition in vacuum systems by mass spectrometry

    P. Řepa et al. “Analyses of gas composition in vacuum systems by mass spectrometry”. In:Journal of Mass Spectrometry37.12 (Dec. 2002), pp. 1287–1291.issn: 1076-5174, 1096-9888.doi:10.1002/jms.388.url: https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.388(visited on 02/04/2026)

    work page doi:10.1002/jms.388.url: 2002

  6. [6]

    An in-line Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Using Thin-core Fiber for Ammonia Gas Sensing With High Sensitivity

    X. Huang et al. “An in-line Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Using Thin-core Fiber for Ammonia Gas Sensing With High Sensitivity”. In:Scientific Reports7.1 (Apr. 5, 2017), p. 44994.issn: 2045-2322.doi:10.1038/ srep44994.url:https://www.nature.com/articles/srep44994(visited on 02/04/2026). 11

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Use of Hydrogen as Fuel: A Trend of the 21st Century

    C. B. B. Farias et al. “Use of Hydrogen as Fuel: A Trend of the 21st Century”. In:Energies15.1 (Jan. 3, 2022), p. 311.issn: 1996-1073.doi:10.3390/en15010311.url:https://www.mdpi.com/1996- 1073/ 15/1/311(visited on 09/16/2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/en15010311.url:https://www.mdpi.com/1996- 2022

  8. [8]

    Hydrogen-Based Energy Systems: Current Technology Develop- ment Status, Opportunities and Challenges

    I. Rolo, V. A. F. Costa, and F. P. Brito. “Hydrogen-Based Energy Systems: Current Technology Develop- ment Status, Opportunities and Challenges”. In:Energies17.1 (Dec. 28, 2023), p. 180.issn: 1996-1073. doi:10.3390/en17010180.url:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/180(visited on 09/16/2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/en17010180.url:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/180(visited 2023

  9. [9]

    Green steel at its crossroads: Hybrid hydrogen-based reduction of iron ores

    I. R. Souza Filho et al. “Green steel at its crossroads: Hybrid hydrogen-based reduction of iron ores”. In: Journal of Cleaner Production340 (Mar. 2022), p. 130805.issn: 09596526.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2022.130805.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652622004437(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro 2022

  10. [10]

    Determination of carbon monoxide, methane and carbon dioxide in refinery hydrogen gases and air by gas chromatography

    M. Kamiński et al. “Determination of carbon monoxide, methane and carbon dioxide in refinery hydrogen gases and air by gas chromatography”. In:Journal of Chromatography A989.2 (Mar. 2003), pp. 277–283. issn: 00219673.doi:10.1016/S0021- 9673(03)00032- 3.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0021967303000323(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0021- 2003

  11. [11]

    History of gas chromatography

    K. D. Bartle and P. Myers. “History of gas chromatography”. In:TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 21.9 (Sept. 2002), pp. 547–557.issn: 01659936.doi:10.1016/S0165- 9936(02)00806- 3.url:https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993602008063(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0165- 2002

  12. [12]

    Methods for gas chromatography-olfactometry: a review

    S. M. Van Ruth. “Methods for gas chromatography-olfactometry: a review”. In:Biomolecular Engineering 17.4 (May 2001), pp. 121–128.issn: 13890344.doi:10.1016/S1389- 0344(01)00070- 3.url:https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389034401000703(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/s1389- 2001

  13. [13]

    Application of electrochemical sensors and sensor matrixes for measurement of odorous chem- ical compounds

    J. Gebicki. “Application of electrochemical sensors and sensor matrixes for measurement of odorous chem- ical compounds”. In:TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry77 (Mar. 2016), pp. 1–13.issn: 01659936. doi:10 . 1016 / j . trac . 2015 . 10 . 005.url:https : / / linkinghub . elsevier . com / retrieve / pii / S0165993615300923(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Applications and Advances in Electronic-Nose Technologies

    A. D. Wilson and M. Baietto. “Applications and Advances in Electronic-Nose Technologies”. In:Sensors 9.7 (June 29, 2009), pp. 5099–5148.issn: 1424-8220.doi:10.3390/s90705099.url:https://www.mdpi. com/1424-8220/9/7/5099(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/s90705099.url:https://www.mdpi 2009

  15. [15]

    Recent progress on laser absorption spectroscopy for determination of gaseous chemical species

    B. Fu et al. “Recent progress on laser absorption spectroscopy for determination of gaseous chemical species”. In:Applied Spectroscopy Reviews57.2 (Feb. 7, 2022), pp. 112–152.issn: 0570-4928, 1520-569X. doi:10.1080/05704928.2020.1857258.url:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/ 05704928.2020.1857258(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.1080/05704928.2020.1857258.url:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/ 2022

  16. [16]

    Ultralow Gas Concentration Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy

    L. B. Kreuzer. “Ultralow Gas Concentration Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy”. In:Journal of Applied Physics42.7 (June 1, 1971), pp. 2934–2943.issn: 0021-8979.doi:10.1063/1.1660651.url:https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1660651(visited on 01/02/2025)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1660651.url:https: 1971

  17. [17]

    Cavity ring-down optical spectrometer for absorption measurements using pulsed laser sources

    A. O’Keefe and D. A. G. Deacon. “Cavity ring-down optical spectrometer for absorption measurements using pulsed laser sources”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments59.12 (Dec. 1, 1988), pp. 2544–2551.issn: 0034-6748, 1089-7623.doi:10.1063/1.1139895.url:https://pubs.aip.org/rsi/article/59/12/ 2544/313248/Cavity-ring-down-optical-spectrometer-for(visited on ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1139895.url:https://pubs.aip.org/rsi/article/59/12/ 1988

  18. [18]

    D. A. Long.The Raman Effect: A Unified Treatment of the Theory of Raman Scattering by Molecules. 1sted.Wiley,Apr.15,2002.isbn:0-470-84576-7.doi:10.1002/0470845767.url:https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/0470845767(visited on 10/22/2024)

    work page doi:10.1002/0470845767.url:https://onlinelibrary 2002

  19. [19]

    On the Possibility of Detecting Molecular Hydrogen and Nitrogen in Planetary and Stellar Atmospheres by Their Rotation-Vibration Spectra

    G. Herzberg. “On the Possibility of Detecting Molecular Hydrogen and Nitrogen in Planetary and Stellar Atmospheres by Their Rotation-Vibration Spectra”. In:The Astrophysical Journal87 (May 1938), p. 428. issn: 0004-637X, 1538-4357.doi:10.1086/143935.url:http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1086/ 143935(visited on 02/04/2026)

    work page doi:10.1086/143935.url:http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1086/ 1938

  20. [20]

    Quadrupole Rotation-Vibration Spectrum of the Hydrogen Molecule

    G. Herzberg. “Quadrupole Rotation-Vibration Spectrum of the Hydrogen Molecule”. In:Nature163.4135 (Jan. 29, 1949), pp. 170–170.issn: 0028-0836, 1476-4687.doi:10.1038/163170a0.url:https://www. nature.com/articles/163170a0(visited on 02/04/2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/163170a0.url:https://www 1949

  21. [21]

    Advances in mid-infrared spectroscopy enabled by supercontinuum laser sources

    I. Zorin et al. “Advances in mid-infrared spectroscopy enabled by supercontinuum laser sources”. In: Optics Express30.4 (Feb. 14, 2022), p. 5222.issn: 1094-4087.doi:10.1364/OE.447269.url:https: //opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-4-5222(visited on 02/04/2026)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.447269.url:https: 2022

  22. [22]

    Weber, ed.Raman Spectroscopy of Gases and Liquids

    A. Weber, ed.Raman Spectroscopy of Gases and Liquids. Vol. 11. Topics in Current Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1979.isbn: 978-3-642-81279-8.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81279- 8.url:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-81279-8(visited on 11/12/2024). 12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81279- 1979

  23. [23]

    Raman cross section of some simple gases

    W. R. Fenner et al. “Raman cross section of some simple gases”. In:Journal of the Optical Society of America63.1 (Jan. 1, 1973), p. 73.issn: 0030-3941.doi:10 . 1364 / JOSA . 63 . 000073.url:https : //opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-63-1-73(visited on 11/12/2024)

    work page 1973

  24. [24]

    A review of cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a gas sensing method

    P. Wang et al. “A review of cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a gas sensing method”. In:Applied Spectroscopy Reviews55.5 (May 27, 2020), pp. 393–417.issn: 0570-4928, 1520-569X.doi:10 . 1080 / 05704928.2019.1661850.url:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/05704928.2019. 1661850(visited on 12/12/2024)

    work page doi:10.1080/05704928.2019 2020

  25. [25]

    A Short Review of Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Gas Analysis

    C. Niklas, H. Wackerbarth, and G. Ctistis. “A Short Review of Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Gas Analysis”. In:Sensors21.5 (Mar. 2, 2021), p. 1698.issn: 1424-8220.doi:10.3390/s21051698. url:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/5/1698(visited on 06/25/2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/s21051698 2021

  26. [26]

    Multiple Gas Detection by Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Sub-ppm Sen- sitivity

    Q.-y. Yang et al. “Multiple Gas Detection by Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Sub-ppm Sen- sitivity”. In:Analytical Chemistry95.13 (Apr. 4, 2023), pp. 5652–5660.issn: 0003-2700, 1520-6882.doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05432.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05432 (visited on 06/25/2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05432.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05432 2023

  27. [27]

    Multigas Analysis by Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Power Transformer Diagnosis

    P. Wang et al. “Multigas Analysis by Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Power Transformer Diagnosis”. In:Analytical Chemistry92.8 (Apr. 21, 2020), pp. 5969–5977.issn: 0003-2700, 1520-6882.doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00179.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00179 (visited on 06/25/2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00179.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00179 2020

  28. [28]

    An introduction to Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization

    E. D. Black. “An introduction to Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization”. In:American Journal of Physics69.1 (Jan. 1, 2001), pp. 79–87.issn: 0002-9505, 1943-2909.doi:10.1119/1.1286663.url: https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/69/1/79/1055569/An-introduction-to-Pound-Drever-Hall- laser(visited on 05/05/2025)

    work page doi:10.1119/1.1286663.url: 2001

  29. [29]

    A review of Pound-Drever-Hall laser frequency locking

    M. Nickerson. “A review of Pound-Drever-Hall laser frequency locking”. In:JILA, University of Colorado and NIST(2019), p. 7.url:https://jila1.nickersonm.com/papers/PDH%20Locking%20Review.pdf (visited on 11/17/2025)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Detection of Trace Gaseous Impurities in Hydrogen for Fuel Cells

    P. Wang et al. “Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Detection of Trace Gaseous Impurities in Hydrogen for Fuel Cells”. In:Analytical Chemistry95.17 (May 2, 2023), pp. 6894–6904.issn: 0003-2700, 1520-6882.doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00066.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs. analchem.3c00066(visited on 10/21/2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00066.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs 2023

  31. [31]

    Wang et al

    J. Wang et al. “Highly sensitive multi-pass cavity enhanced Raman spectroscopy with novel polarization filtering for quantitative measurement of SF6 decomposed components in gas-insulated power equipment”. In:Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical380 (Apr. 2023), p. 133350.issn: 09254005.doi:10.1016/j.snb. 2023.133350.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrie...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb 2023

  32. [32]

    Diagnosis of Multiple Gases Separated from Transformer Oil Using Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

    L. Xiao-Yun et al. “Diagnosis of Multiple Gases Separated from Transformer Oil Using Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy”. In:Chinese Physics Letters25.9 (Sept. 2008), pp. 3326–3329.issn: 0256-307X, 1741-3540.doi:10.1088/0256- 307X/25/9/062.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1088/0256-307X/25/9/062(visited on 12/31/2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/0256- 2008

  33. [33]

    Ambient Hydrocarbon Detection with an Ultra-Low-Loss Cavity Raman An- alyzer

    J. Singh and A. Muller. “Ambient Hydrocarbon Detection with an Ultra-Low-Loss Cavity Raman An- alyzer”. In:Analytical Chemistry95.7 (Feb. 21, 2023), pp. 3703–3711.issn: 0003-2700, 1520-6882.doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04707.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04707 (visited on 01/20/2026)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04707.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04707 2023

  34. [34]

    High-Precision Trace Hydrogen Sensing by Multipass Raman Scattering

    J. Singh and A. Muller. “High-Precision Trace Hydrogen Sensing by Multipass Raman Scattering”. In: Sensors23.11 (May 29, 2023), p. 5171.issn: 1424-8220.doi:10.3390/s23115171.url:https://www. mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/11/5171(visited on 01/19/2026)

    work page doi:10.3390/s23115171.url:https://www 2023

  35. [35]

    Isotopic trace analysis of water vapor with multipass cavity Raman scattering

    J. Singh and A. Muller. “Isotopic trace analysis of water vapor with multipass cavity Raman scattering”. In:The Analyst146.21 (2021), pp. 6482–6489.issn: 0003-2654, 1364-5528.doi:10.1039/D1AN01254A. url:https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D1AN01254A(visited on 09/08/2025)

    work page doi:10.1039/d1an01254a 2021

  36. [36]

    Raman scattering applied to human breath analysis

    C. M. Arachchige and A. Muller. “Raman scattering applied to human breath analysis”. In:TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry177 (Aug. 2024), p. 117791.issn: 01659936.doi:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117791. url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165993624002747(visited on 02/03/2026)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117791 2024

  37. [37]

    SpontaneousRamanscatteringattracegasconcentrationswithapressurized external multipass cavity

    J.S.G.VelezandA.Muller.“SpontaneousRamanscatteringattracegasconcentrationswithapressurized external multipass cavity”. In:Measurement Science and Technology32.4 (Apr. 1, 2021), p. 045501.issn: 0957-0233, 1361-6501.doi:10.1088/1361-6501/abd11e.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/ 10.1088/1361-6501/abd11e(visited on 02/03/2026). 13

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6501/abd11e.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/ 2021

  38. [38]

    Gas detection using cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy with a bidirec- tional multi-pass cell and polarization beam-splitting optical path

    Y. Zheng, X. Zou, and S. He. “Gas detection using cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy with a bidirec- tional multi-pass cell and polarization beam-splitting optical path”. In:Applied Physics B130.8 (Aug. 2024), p. 144.issn: 0946-2171, 1432-0649.doi:10.1007/s00340- 024- 08285- y.url:https://link. springer.com/10.1007/s00340-024-08285-y(visited on 11/18/2024)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00340- 2024

  39. [39]

    Portable Raman hydrogen concentration mapping with parts-per- billion sensitivity

    C. Muktha Arachchige and A. Muller. “Portable Raman hydrogen concentration mapping with parts-per- billion sensitivity”. In:Applied Optics64.13 (May 1, 2025), p. 3646.issn: 1559-128X, 2155-3165.doi: 10.1364/ao.558965.url:https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-64-13-3646(visited on 07/21/2025)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.558965.url:https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm 2025

  40. [40]

    Trace gas sensing using diode-pumped collinearly detected spontaneous Raman scattering enhanced by a multipass cell

    J. Gomez Velez and A. Muller. “Trace gas sensing using diode-pumped collinearly detected spontaneous Raman scattering enhanced by a multipass cell”. In:Optics Letters45.1 (Jan. 1, 2020), p. 133.issn: 0146- 9592, 1539-4794.doi:10.1364/OL.45.000133.url:https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol- 45-1-133(visited on 12/12/2024)

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.45.000133.url:https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm 2020

  41. [41]

    High-Sensitivity and In Situ Multi-Component Detection of Gases Based on Multiple- Reflection-Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

    D. Yang et al. “High-Sensitivity and In Situ Multi-Component Detection of Gases Based on Multiple- Reflection-Cavity-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy”. In:Sensors24.17 (Sept. 7, 2024), p. 5825.issn: 1424- 8220.doi:10.3390/s24175825.url:https://www.mdpi.com/1424- 8220/24/17/5825(visited on 11/18/2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/s24175825.url:https://www.mdpi.com/1424- 2024

  42. [42]

    High-SensitivityRamanGasProbeforInSituMulti-ComponentGasDetection

    J.Guoetal.“High-SensitivityRamanGasProbeforInSituMulti-ComponentGasDetection”.In:Sensors 21.10 (May 19, 2021), p. 3539.issn: 1424-8220.doi:10.3390/s21103539.url:https://www.mdpi.com/ 1424-8220/21/10/3539(visited on 12/12/2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/s21103539.url:https://www.mdpi.com/ 2021

  43. [43]

    Highly sensitive Raman system for dissolved gas analysis in water

    D. Yang et al. “Highly sensitive Raman system for dissolved gas analysis in water”. In:Applied Optics 55.27 (Sept. 20, 2016), p. 7744.issn: 0003-6935, 1539-4522.doi:10.1364/AO.55.007744.url:https: //opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-55-27-7744(visited on 03/03/2025)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.55.007744.url:https: 2016

  44. [44]

    Multipass optical system for a Raman gas spectrometer

    D. V. Petrov. “Multipass optical system for a Raman gas spectrometer”. In:Applied Optics55.33 (Nov. 20, 2016), p. 9521.issn: 0003-6935, 1539-4522.doi:10.1364/AO.55.009521.url:https://opg.optica. org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-55-33-9521(visited on 12/12/2024)

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.55.009521.url:https://opg.optica 2016

  45. [45]

    Near-confocal cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for multitrace-gas detection

    X. Li et al. “Near-confocal cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for multitrace-gas detection”. In:Optics Letters33.18 (Sept. 15, 2008), p. 2143.issn: 0146-9592, 1539-4794.doi:10.1364/OL.33.002143.url: https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-33-18-2143(visited on 03/03/2025)

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.33.002143.url: 2008

  46. [46]

    Parabolic mirror cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for trace gas detection

    J. Miao et al. “Parabolic mirror cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for trace gas detection”. In:Optics Letters49.19 (Oct. 1, 2024), p. 5455.issn: 0146-9592, 1539-4794.doi:10.1364/OL.534842.url:https: //opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-49-19-5455(visited on 03/03/2025). [47]IUPAC - limit of detection (L03540). IUPAC Gold Book.url:https://goldbook.iupac....

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.534842.url:https: 2024

  47. [47]

    LimitofDetectionACloserLookattheIUPACDefinition

    G.L.LongandJ.D.Winefordner.“LimitofDetectionACloserLookattheIUPACDefinition”.In:Analyt- ical Chemistry55.7 (June 1, 1983), 712A–724A.issn: 0003-2700, 1520-6882.doi:10.1021/ac00258a724. url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ac00258a724(visited on 09/15/2025)

    work page doi:10.1021/ac00258a724 1983

  48. [48]

    Calibration in atomic spectrometry: A tutorial review dealing with quality criteria, weight- ing procedures and possible curvatures

    J.-M. Mermet. “Calibration in atomic spectrometry: A tutorial review dealing with quality criteria, weight- ing procedures and possible curvatures”. In:Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy65.7 (July 2010), pp. 509–523.issn: 05848547.doi:10.1016/j.sab.2010.05.007.url:https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0584854710001394(visited on 08/04/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sab.2010.05.007.url:https://linkinghub 2010

  49. [49]

    Pattern Recognition 127 (2022), 108611

    J.-M. Mermet. “Limit of quantitation in atomic spectrometry: An unambiguous concept?” In:Spectrochim- ica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy63.2 (Feb. 2008), pp. 166–182.issn: 05848547.doi:10.1016/j. sab . 2007 . 11 . 029.url:https : / / linkinghub . elsevier . com / retrieve / pii / S0584854707004430 (visited on 08/04/2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2008

  50. [50]

    N. R. Draper and H. Smith.Applied regression analysis. 3rd ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics. New York Chichester Weinheim [etc.]: J. Wiley & sons, 1998.isbn: 978-0-471-17082-2.url:https : //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118625590

    work page doi:10.1002/9781118625590 1998

  51. [51]

    D. L. Massart.Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics. Data handling in science and technology v

    work page

  52. [52]

    1021/ci980427d

    Amsterdam New York: Elsevier, 1997.isbn: 0-444-89724-0.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10. 1021/ci980427d

    work page 1997

  53. [53]

    A Technique for Evaluation of CCD Video-Camera Noise

    K. Irie et al. “A Technique for Evaluation of CCD Video-Camera Noise”. In:IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology18.2 (Feb. 2008), pp. 280–284.issn: 1051-8215, 1558-2205. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2007.913972.url:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4400030/(visited on 08/08/2025). 14

    work page doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2007.913972.url:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4400030/(visited 2008

  54. [54]

    Overtone Excitation of Nitrogen Molecules via Stimulated Raman Pumping

    Y. Xiao et al. “Overtone Excitation of Nitrogen Molecules via Stimulated Raman Pumping”. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters15.46 (Nov. 21, 2024), pp. 11510–11516.issn: 1948-7185, 1948- 7185.doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02608.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett. 4c02608(visited on 01/20/2026). 15

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02608.url:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett 2024