Recognition: no theorem link
A comparison of the weakest contractive conditions for Banach and Kannan mappings
Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:06 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
For Kannan mappings on complete metric spaces, several weakest convergence conditions are equivalent when deduced only from fixed point existence, while the same equivalence fails for Banach contractions.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We give a direct proof that several weakest convergence conditions are equivalent for Kannan-type mappings on complete metric spaces. This proof is achieved without assuming the completeness or the convergence of Picard sequences; it deduces the equivalence only from the existence of fixed points. In contrast, we construct a counterexample showing that the corresponding equivalence fails for Banach contractions. Finally, we prove that this discrepancy disappears on G-complete metric spaces, clarifying the role of completeness in weakest fixed point theory.
What carries the argument
Weakest convergence-type conditions defined along Picard sequences, whose equivalence is shown to follow directly from fixed-point existence for Kannan mappings but is refuted by explicit counterexample for Banach mappings.
If this is right
- Equivalence of the weakest conditions for Kannan mappings follows solely from the existence of fixed points.
- The equivalence does not hold for Banach contractions on complete metric spaces.
- The equivalence is restored for both classes of mappings when the space is G-complete.
- Completeness assumptions play qualitatively different roles in the weakest fixed-point theory for Kannan versus Banach mappings.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The direct proof technique for Kannan mappings may extend to other non-contractive classes that admit fixed points under minimal assumptions.
- The counterexample for Banach contractions isolates a concrete limitation on how far weakest conditions can be relaxed without additional structure.
- G-completeness appears to act as a common refinement that erases class-specific differences in convergence behavior.
Load-bearing premise
The standard definitions of Banach contractions, Kannan mappings, Picard sequences, and the weakest convergence-type conditions as given in the cited prior literature hold, along with the metric space axioms.
What would settle it
A complete metric space equipped with a Banach contraction for which the weakest convergence conditions are nevertheless equivalent would falsify the claim that equivalence fails for the Banach case.
read the original abstract
We study the weakest convergence-type conditions for fixed point results for Banach and Kannan mappings. Building on Suzuki's weakest condition for Banach mappings and our previous result for Kannan mappings, we compare convergence conditions defined along Picard sequences. We give a direct proof that several weakest convergence conditions are equivalent for Kannan-type mappings on complete metric spaces. This proof is achieved without assuming the completeness or the convergence of Picard sequences; it deduces the equivalence only from the existence of fixed points. In contrast, we construct a counterexample showing that the corresponding equivalence fails for Banach contractions. Finally, we prove that this discrepancy disappears on G-complete metric spaces, clarifying the role of completeness in weakest fixed point theory.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript compares weakest convergence-type conditions for fixed-point results involving Banach contractions and Kannan mappings on metric spaces. Building on Suzuki's condition for Banach mappings and prior work on Kannan mappings, it gives a direct proof that several such conditions are equivalent for Kannan-type mappings on complete metric spaces; the argument relies solely on the existence of fixed points and does not presuppose completeness or convergence of Picard sequences. A counterexample is constructed to show that the corresponding equivalence fails for Banach contractions. The authors then prove that the equivalence is restored on G-complete metric spaces.
Significance. If the claims hold, the paper clarifies the distinct roles of completeness versus G-completeness in weakest fixed-point theory and highlights structural differences between Banach and Kannan contractive conditions. The direct proof strategy (deducing equivalence from fixed-point existence alone) and the explicit counterexample are strengths that could guide further minimal-condition results in metric fixed-point theory.
minor comments (2)
- [Introduction] The introduction should explicitly cite the authors' previous paper on Kannan mappings (mentioned in the abstract) rather than referring to it only as 'our previous result.'
- [Counterexample] In the counterexample section, verify that the constructed space satisfies the metric axioms and that the mapping is indeed a Banach contraction but fails the equivalence; add a brief verification paragraph if not already present.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive evaluation of the manuscript. The summary accurately captures our main contributions, including the direct proof of equivalence for Kannan mappings (relying only on fixed-point existence), the counterexample for Banach contractions, and the clarification via G-completeness. We note the recommendation for minor revision.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivations are self-contained
full rationale
The paper establishes equivalence of weakest convergence conditions for Kannan mappings via a direct proof that relies solely on the existence of fixed points, without invoking completeness or Picard sequence convergence. It contrasts this with an explicit counterexample for Banach contractions and proves restoration under G-completeness. These steps use standard metric space axioms and fixed-point definitions from the literature; no self-definitional reductions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central claims to prior inputs occur. The cited prior result for Kannan mappings provides context but is not required for the new direct equivalence proof.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math A metric space satisfies the standard distance axioms (non-negativity, symmetry, triangle inequality, identity of indiscernibles).
- domain assumption Banach contractions and Kannan mappings are defined by their respective contractive inequalities as stated in the cited literature.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
D. Ariza-Ruiz and A. Jim´ enez-Melado,A continuation method for weakly Kannan maps, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Article ID 321745, 1-12 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[2]
S. Banach,Sur les op´ erations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux ´ equations int´ egrales, Funda- menta Mathematicae,3(1), 133-181 (1922)
work page 1922
-
[3]
D. W. Boyd and J. S. Wong,On nonlinear contractions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,20 (2), 458-464 (1969)
work page 1969
-
[4]
A. Branciari,A fixed point theorem for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences,29(9), 531-536 (2002)
work page 2002
-
[5]
F. E. Browder,On the convergence of successive approximations for nonlinear functional equations, Indagationes Mathematicae,30(1), 27-35 (1968)
work page 1968
-
[6]
L. B. ´Ciri´ c,A generalization of Banach’s contraction principle, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,45(2), 267-273 (1974)
work page 1974
-
[7]
Grabiec,Fixed points in fuzzy metric spaces, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,27, 385–389 (1988)
M. Grabiec,Fixed points in fuzzy metric spaces, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,27, 385–389 (1988)
work page 1988
-
[8]
S. Hashimoto, M. Kikkawa, S. Machihara, and A. Saghir,On the weakest conditions for the existence of fixed points of Kannan and Chatterjea type contractions, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl.28, 29 (2026). 8
work page 2026
-
[9]
S. Y. Huang and W. S. Du,New fixed point theorems for generalized Meir–Keeler type nonlinear mappings with applications to fixed point theory, Symmetry,16(8), 1088 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[10]
J. Jachymski,Equivalent conditions and the Meir-Keeler type theorems, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,194(1), 293-303 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[11]
Kannan,Some results on fixed points, Bull
R. Kannan,Some results on fixed points, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc.,60, 71-76 (1968)
work page 1968
-
[12]
M. S. Khan, M. Swaleh, and S. Sessa,Fixed point theorems by altering distances between the points, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society,30(1), 1-9 (1984)
work page 1984
- [13]
-
[14]
J. Matkowski,Fixed point theorems for contractive mappings in metric spaces, ˇCasopis pro pˇ estov´ an´ ı matematiky, 105(4), 341-344 (1980)
work page 1980
-
[15]
A. Meir and E. Keeler,A theorem on contraction mappings, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 28(1), 326-329 (1969)
work page 1969
-
[16]
D. O’Regan and A. Petru¸ sel,Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions in ordered metric spaces, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,341(2), 1241-1252 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[17]
K. Roy, S. Panja, M. Saha, and R. K. Bisht,On fixed points of generalized Kannan and Reich type contractive mappings, Filomat,37(26), 9079-9087 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[18]
T. Suzuki,A generalized Banach contraction principle that characterizes metric completeness, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,136(5), 1861-1869 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[19]
T. Suzuki,The weakest contractive conditions for Edelstein’s mappings to have a fixed point in complete metric spaces, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl.19, 2361–2368 (2017). F aculty of Science, Kyoto University, Oiwake-tyou Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku Kyoto-shi, 606-8502, Japan Email address:hashimoto.shunya.7m@kyoto-u.ac.jp Department of Mathematics, F aculty of ...
work page 2017
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.