pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11895 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Universal Speed Limit in a Far-from-Equilibrium Bose Gas: Symmetry and Dynamical Decoherence

Jun-Cheng Liang , Bo Chen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords non-thermal fixed pointBose gasuniversal transportcoherence spreadingdynamical decoherenceU(1) symmetrymomentum distributionfar-from-equilibrium
0
0 comments X

The pith

Emergent weak U(1) symmetry and dynamical decoherence together produce a universal momentum distribution that fixes the coherence spreading amplitude at C=3 in far-from-equilibrium Bose gases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to predict the universal amplitude C in the spreading of phase coherence in an isolated Bose gas quenched to a non-thermal fixed point, where the coherence length squared grows as C ħ t / m. Prior work established the scaling but left C undetermined because the underlying particle distribution n(k) ~ k^{-4} produces a divergent kinetic energy. The authors show that an emergent weak U(1) symmetry conserves the total current and forces the low-energy phase to obey a diffusive Langevin equation whose noise is the divergence of a stochastic current; dynamical decoherence of high-momentum modes then generates a universal distribution f(v) ~ (1 + v^2)^{-3} that cuts off the divergence. This structure yields a parameter-free geometric value C = 3 that is independent of microscopic details and accounts for the experimental measurement of 3.4(3) once logarithmic corrections from a marginally irrelevant coupling are included. If correct, this supplies the first quantitative prediction of a transport coefficient in a strongly correlated non-equilibrium quantum system.

Core claim

The authors establish that symmetry constraints on the low-energy dynamics combined with dynamical decoherence produce a universal momentum distribution f̃(v) ∼ (1+v²)^{-3} with v = kℓ. This distribution regularizes the ultraviolet divergence associated with the k^{-4} cascade and fixes the amplitude of coherence spreading to the value C = 3. The experimental result C = 3.4(3) is recovered by adding the leading logarithmic corrections generated by a marginally irrelevant operator at the fixed point.

What carries the argument

The universal momentum distribution f̃(v) ∼ (1 + v²)^{-3} that emerges from diffusive Langevin phase dynamics enforced by a conserved total current under emergent weak U(1) symmetry and is stabilized by dynamical decoherence.

If this is right

  • Coherence spreads at a speed determined solely by C = 3 at the leading scaling level, independent of initial conditions or interaction details.
  • The momentum distribution takes the specific form (1 + v²)^{-3} at the non-thermal fixed point.
  • Small deviations from C = 3 arise universally from logarithmic corrections due to marginally irrelevant couplings.
  • Transport amplitudes in other far-from-equilibrium systems can be predicted by identifying the appropriate symmetry-enforced effective theory and its ultraviolet regularization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar symmetry-decoherence mechanisms may govern transport in other isolated quantum systems such as fermionic gases or lattice models near non-thermal fixed points.
  • Experiments could test the prediction by measuring the full momentum distribution rather than just the coherence length to confirm the (1+v²)^{-3} tail.
  • The regularization technique might resolve divergences in related problems like wave turbulence or prethermalization dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy phase dynamics are governed by a diffusive Langevin equation because the emergent weak U(1) symmetry conserves the total current.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the rescaled single-particle momentum distribution at the non-thermal fixed point does not follow the form (1 + v²)^{-3} would disprove the regularization mechanism and the resulting value of C = 3.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11895 by Bo Chen, Jun-Cheng Liang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) Universal constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. One-loop Feynman diagram for the phase field self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Predicting universal transport coefficients in far-from-equilibrium quantum systems remains a fundamental challenge. A paradigmatic example is the non-thermal fixed point (NTFP) of isolated Bose gases, where coherence spreads as $\ell^2(t) = C\hbar t/m$ with a universal constant $C$. While the scaling exponent $z=2$ is well established, the amplitude $C$ has remained elusive because the underlying particle cascade $n(k)\sim k^{-4}$ leads to a divergent kinetic energy, threatening the very existence of a constant speed limit. Here we resolve this paradox and present the first analytical, parameter-free prediction of a universal amplitude $C$. A deep interplay between symmetry and dissipation is uncovered. The emergent weak U(1) symmetry at the NTFP enforces a conserved total current, forcing the low-energy phase dynamics to obey a diffusive Langevin equation with noise entering as the divergence of a stochastic current. This structure, combined with dynamical decoherence of high-momentum modes, yields a universal power-law momentum distribution $\tilde{f}(v)\sim(1+v^2)^{-3}$ (with $v=k\ell$) that naturally regularizes the ultraviolet divergence. From this, a parameter-free geometric baseline $C=3$ is obtained, independent of microscopic details. The experimental value $C=3.4(3)$ [Martirosyan et al., Nature 647, 608 (2025)] is then shown to be quantitatively consistent with universal logarithmic corrections arising from a marginally irrelevant coupling at the fixed point. A new paradigm is thus established for predicting transport coefficients in strongly correlated non-equilibrium systems: symmetry constraints determine the low-energy effective theory, dynamical decoherence provides a natural ultraviolet completion, and scaling analysis delivers testable predictions moving beyond scaling exponents to quantitative amplitude prediction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to resolve the UV divergence paradox in the non-thermal fixed point (NTFP) of isolated Bose gases, where the coherence length obeys ℓ²(t) = C ħ t / m with z=2 but unknown amplitude C. It derives a parameter-free geometric baseline C=3 from an emergent weak U(1) symmetry that enforces a conserved total current, yielding a diffusive Langevin equation for low-energy phase dynamics whose noise is the divergence of a stochastic current. Dynamical decoherence of high-momentum modes then produces the universal distribution f̃(v) ∼ (1 + v²)^{-3} (v = kℓ) that regularizes the k^{-4} cascade, giving C=3 independent of microscopic details. The experimental value C=3.4(3) is attributed to universal logarithmic corrections from a marginally irrelevant coupling at the fixed point.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies the first analytical, parameter-free prediction of a transport amplitude (rather than only the exponent) in a strongly correlated far-from-equilibrium quantum system. It establishes a concrete paradigm—symmetry-constrained effective stochastic dynamics plus decoherence as UV completion—for quantitative predictions beyond scaling, with direct relevance to ongoing experiments on NTFP dynamics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Effective phase dynamics] The claim that emergent weak U(1) symmetry plus conserved total current forces the low-energy phase dynamics into a diffusive Langevin equation with noise strictly as the divergence of a stochastic current is load-bearing for the exact exponent -3 and thus for parameter-free C=3, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit microscopic derivation of the noise correlator from the underlying Gross-Pitaevskii or quantum-field dynamics (see the section introducing the effective phase equation).
  2. [Momentum distribution] The derivation of f̃(v) ∼ (1 + v²)^{-3} from the proposed Langevin equation plus decoherence is presented without the intermediate steps, error estimates, or regularization procedure; it is therefore impossible to verify that the power -3 is fixed by symmetry alone rather than by additional assumptions on the decoherence mechanism or noise structure (see the section on the momentum distribution and UV regularization).
  3. [Experimental comparison] The quantitative consistency of C=3.4(3) with logarithmic corrections from a marginally irrelevant operator is asserted but not accompanied by an explicit computation of the correction function or its coefficient, leaving the comparison non-falsifiable at present (see the section comparing to experiment).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Define v = kℓ and the normalization of f̃(v) at first appearance; the current notation is introduced only after the distribution is used.
  2. [Appendix] Add a brief appendix or supplementary note showing the explicit integration that converts f̃(v) into the geometric baseline C=3.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review, the positive assessment of the potential significance of our work, and the constructive major comments. We address each point below, providing clarifications based on the symmetry arguments in the manuscript and indicating the revisions we will implement to enhance verifiability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Effective phase dynamics] The claim that emergent weak U(1) symmetry plus conserved total current forces the low-energy phase dynamics into a diffusive Langevin equation with noise strictly as the divergence of a stochastic current is load-bearing for the exact exponent -3 and thus for parameter-free C=3, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit microscopic derivation of the noise correlator from the underlying Gross-Pitaevskii or quantum-field dynamics (see the section introducing the effective phase equation).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit microscopic derivation would strengthen the presentation and make the load-bearing claim easier to verify. The manuscript motivates the effective phase equation via symmetry: the emergent weak U(1) symmetry at the NTFP enforces conservation of the total current, which requires the stochastic noise to enter the phase dynamics strictly as the divergence of a stochastic current (ensuring the continuity equation is preserved). This structure directly yields the diffusive Langevin form. To address the concern, we will add a dedicated appendix deriving the noise correlator step by step from the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, including the projection to low-energy modes and the symmetry constraints that fix the divergence structure of the noise. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Momentum distribution] The derivation of f̃(v) ∼ (1 + v²)^{-3} from the proposed Langevin equation plus decoherence is presented without the intermediate steps, error estimates, or regularization procedure; it is therefore impossible to verify that the power -3 is fixed by symmetry alone rather than by additional assumptions on the decoherence mechanism or noise structure (see the section on the momentum distribution and UV regularization).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the intermediate steps were condensed. The exponent -3 follows from the symmetry-constrained Langevin dynamics: the divergence-form noise (enforced by current conservation) combined with decoherence of high-momentum modes produces a steady-state phase fluctuation spectrum whose Fourier transform yields f̃(v) ∼ (1 + v²)^{-3} after regularization by the decoherence cutoff. This power is fixed by the symmetry and the noise structure rather than by details of the decoherence. We will expand the relevant section to include the full derivation (Fourier-space solution of the Langevin equation, computation of the two-point correlator, and explicit regularization), along with error estimates from higher-order terms in the effective theory. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experimental comparison] The quantitative consistency of C=3.4(3) with logarithmic corrections from a marginally irrelevant operator is asserted but not accompanied by an explicit computation of the correction function or its coefficient, leaving the comparison non-falsifiable at present (see the section comparing to experiment).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit computation of the correction would render the comparison more rigorous and falsifiable. The manuscript argues that the difference between the geometric baseline C=3 and the measured C=3.4(3) arises from universal logarithmic corrections generated by a marginally irrelevant coupling at the NTFP. To address this, we will add an explicit renormalization-group calculation of the leading logarithmic correction function and its coefficient, expressed in terms of the microscopic interaction strength, allowing a direct, quantitative comparison with the experimental value. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation of C=3 is self-contained from symmetry and decoherence assumptions

full rationale

The paper's central chain begins with the emergent weak U(1) symmetry implying a conserved current, which is used to postulate a diffusive Langevin equation for the phase with divergence-form noise. Dynamical decoherence is then invoked to produce the specific distribution f(v)~(1+v^2)^{-3}. Integration of this distribution supplies the geometric baseline C=3. None of these steps reduces to a fitted parameter, a self-citation of the target result, or an ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors; the effective theory is stated as an independent construction whose output (the exponent -3 and resulting C) is not presupposed in the inputs. The comparison to experiment C=3.4(3) is presented separately and does not enter the derivation. This satisfies the default expectation of a non-circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the emergent weak U(1) symmetry and the specific form of the decoherence-induced momentum distribution; no free parameters are introduced and no new entities are postulated beyond the effective Langevin description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Emergent weak U(1) symmetry at the NTFP enforces a conserved total current
    Invoked to justify the diffusive Langevin equation for low-energy phase dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1342 out tokens · 73759 ms · 2026-05-13T04:48:55.984776+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    yields a universal power-law momentum distribution f̃(v)∼(1+v²)^{-3} ... From this, a parameter-free geometric baseline C=3 is obtained

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean embed_injective echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    emergent weak U(1) symmetry ... enforces a conserved total current, forcing the low-energy phase dynamics to obey a diffusive Langevin equation with noise entering as the divergence of a stochastic current

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The microscopic action in the Keldysh basis, Eq

    Keldysh Field Theory Framework The Keldysh closed-time path integral provides the fundamental framework for non-equilibrium quantum systems [6, 45–47]. The microscopic action in the Keldysh basis, Eq. (8) of the main text, is our starting point. The classical fieldψ c and quantum fieldψ q have di- mension [L −3/2], with|ψ c|2 giving particle density. Co- ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Rigorous Derivation of Modified Ward Identities We now derive the modified Ward identities that en- code how dissipation modifies the symmetry constraints at the NTFP. 2.1 Strong U(1) transformation To derive the Ward identity for response to an external phase twist, we apply an infinitesimal localstrong U(1) transformationwith opposite phases on the two ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    That transformation is not a symmetry of the dissipa- tive action, but its variation yields the exact identitie (A11)

    Weak U(1) Symmetry and Connection to Gauge-Invariant Response Theory In the previous subsections we employed the strong U(1) transformation (ψ + →e iθψ+, ψ − →e −iθψ−) as a technical tool to derive the modified Ward identity. That transformation is not a symmetry of the dissipa- tive action, but its variation yields the exact identitie (A11). Here we inst...

    work page

  4. [4]

    From the Dyson equation for the retarded response function, χR ϕϕ(k, ω) −1 = χR ϕϕ,0(k, ω) −1 −Σ R ϕϕ(k, ω),(B1) whereχ R ϕϕ,0 is the bare response

    Perturbative analysis and its limitations Dimensional analysis and the need for non-perturbative treatmentWe first establish the expected dimension of the phase-field self-energy ΣR ϕϕ. From the Dyson equation for the retarded response function, χR ϕϕ(k, ω) −1 = χR ϕϕ,0(k, ω) −1 −Σ R ϕϕ(k, ω),(B1) whereχ R ϕϕ,0 is the bare response. Using the definition χ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Physical interpretation and self-energy scaling at the NTFP The perturbative analysis above reveals the funda- mental mechanism by which interactions generate dis- sipation. The productG KGR in the self-energy repre- sents energy transfer from collective modes to the non- equilibrium excitation “bath”:G K encodes the noise of the background, whileG R desc...

    work page

  6. [6]

    In the classical-wave limit characteristic of the NTFP [17], this yields an effective action for the condensate alone

    Effective Langevin Equation and Conserved Noise from Symmetry and Scaling The effective Langevin equation (31) and the conserved noise correlation (32) can be derived from the Keldysh action (8) by separating slow condensate and fast quasi- particle modes and integrating out the latter [46]. In the classical-wave limit characteristic of the NTFP [17], thi...

    work page

  7. [7]

    To ensure dimensional consistency and exploit the scale invariance, we introduce a dimensionless framework using charac- teristic scales of the system

    Dimensionless Framework and Scale Invariance at the NTFP At the NTFP, the system exhibits emergent scale in- variance with dynamic critical exponentz= 2. To ensure dimensional consistency and exploit the scale invariance, we introduce a dimensionless framework using charac- teristic scales of the system. The natural characteris- tic length is the healing ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (C5) transforms into dimensionless form as follows

    Construction of Dimensionless Noise Correlation Function The dimensional noise correlation function in Eq. (C5) transforms into dimensionless form as follows. Using the definitions in Eq. (C8) and the relation ˜Dϕ = mDmacro ϕ /ℏ=mD ϕ/(ℏnξ3), we obtain ⟨˜ζ(˜r, ˜t)˜ζ(˜r′, ˜t′)⟩=−2 ˜Dϕ ˜∇2δ(˜r− ˜r′)δ(˜t− ˜t′).(C10) This conserved form, with the Laplacian ope...

    work page

  9. [9]

    To fix the numerical coefficient, we adopt the standard Gaussian white noise approximation for the stochastic current, which yields a tractable Langevin equation

    Coherence Length Growth in Dimensionless Units Before performing the explicit calculation, we note that dimensional analysis and scaling alone determine the growth law up to a dimensionless constant:ℓ 2(t)∝ Dmacro ϕ t. To fix the numerical coefficient, we adopt the standard Gaussian white noise approximation for the stochastic current, which yields a trac...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Equivalence of Theoretical and Experimental Coherence Length Definitions A crucial step in connecting our theoretical frame- work to experiment is to demonstrate that the coherence lengthℓ(t) extracted from the momentum distribution in the experiment [31] is identical to the theoretical coher- ence length governing phase correlations. This equiva- lence r...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Crucially, the derivation involves no ad- justable parameters, only universal fixed-point properties and the coherence length definition

    Physical Synthesis The dimensionless framework establishes a self- consistent theoretical chain: symmetry principles yield conserved noise; the Langevin equation gives diffusive coherence growthℓ 2 = 4D macro ϕ t; and the relationC= 4mDmacro ϕ /ℏconnects microscopic transport to the uni- versal constant. Crucially, the derivation involves no ad- justable ...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed in- teracting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 863 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, Qcd thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Friesdorf, and C. Gogolin, Quantum many- body systems out of equilibrium, Nat. Phys.11, 124 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    L. W. Clark, L. Feng, and C. Chin, Universal space-time scaling symmetry in the dynamics of bosons across a quantum phase transition, Science354, 606 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Eismann, L

    U. Eismann, L. Khaykovich, S. Laurent, I. Ferrier- Barbut, B. S. Rem, A. T. Grier, M. Delehaye, F. Chevy, C. Salomon, L.-C. Ha, and C. Chin, Universal loss dy- namics in a unitary bose gas, Phys. Rev. X6, 021025 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 096001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    C. Gao, M. Sun, P. Zhang, and H. Zhai, Universal dy- namics of a degenerate bose gas quenched to unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 040403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Z.-Y. Shi, C. Gao, and H. Zhai, Ideal-gas approach to hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. X11, 041031 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    N. P. Proukakis, Universality of Bose–Einstein condensa- tion and quenched formation dynamics, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition), edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) second edition ed., pp. 84–123

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Li, T.-G

    Y. Li, T.-G. Zhou, Z. Wu, P. Peng, S. Zhang, R. Fu, R. Zhang, W. Zheng, P. Zhang, H. Zhai, X. Peng, and J. Du, Emergent universal quench dynamics in randomly interacting spin models, Nat. Phys.20, 1966 (2024)

    work page 1966

  22. [22]

    Zhang, H

    T. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Wang, A. Du, Z. Li, Y. Wu, C. Li, J. Hu, H. Zhai, and W. Chen, Observa- tion of near-critical kibble-zurek scaling in rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 093403 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Vikram, L

    A. Vikram, L. Shou, and V. Galitski, Proof of a universal speed limit on fast scrambling in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 150401 (2026)

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    E. H. Lieb and D. W. Robinson, The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems, Commun. Math. Phys.28, 251 (1972)

    work page 1972

  25. [25]

    Berges, A

    J. Berges, A. Rothkopf, and J. Schmidt, Nonthermal fixed points: Effective weak coupling for strongly cor- related systems far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 041603 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Nowak, J

    B. Nowak, J. Schole, D. Sexty, and T. Gasenzer, Nonther- mal fixed points, vortex statistics, and superfluid turbu- lence in an ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A85, 043627 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Pi˜ neiro Orioli, K

    A. Pi˜ neiro Orioli, K. Boguslavski, and J. Berges, Univer- sal self-similar dynamics of relativistic and nonrelativistic field theories near nonthermal fixed points, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025041 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Chantesana, A

    I. Chantesana, A. Pi˜ neiro Orioli, and T. Gasenzer, Ki- netic theory of nonthermal fixed points in a Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A99, 043620 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  30. [30]

    B. V. Svistunov, Superfluid turbulence in the low- temperature limit, Phys. Rev. B52, 3647 (1995)

    work page 1995

  31. [31]

    W. F. Vinen and J. J. Niemela, Quantum turbulence, J. Low Temp. Phys.128, 167 (2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    M. Gazo, A. Karailiev, T. Satoor, C. Eigen, M. Ga lka, and Z. Hadzibabic, Universal coarsening in a homoge- neous two-dimensional Bose gas, Science389, 802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    S. P. Johnstone, A. J. Groszek, P. T. Starkey, C. J. Billington, T. P. Simula, and K. Helmerson, Evolution of large-scale flow from turbulence in a two-dimensional superfluid, Science364, 1267 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Pr¨ uferet al., Observation of universal dynamics in a spinor Bose gas far from equilibrium, Nature563, 217 (2018)

    M. Pr¨ uferet al., Observation of universal dynamics in a spinor Bose gas far from equilibrium, Nature563, 217 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Huhet al., Universality class of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate far from equilibrium, Nat

    S. Huhet al., Universality class of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate far from equilibrium, Nat. Phys.20, 402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    J. A. P. Gliddenet al., Bidirectional dynamic scaling in an isolated Bose gas far from equilibrium, Nat. Phys.17, 457 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    A. D. Garc´ ıa-Orozco, L. Madeira, M. A. Moreno-Armijos, A. R. Fritsch, P. E. S. Tavares, P. C. M. Castilho, A. Cidrim, G. Roati, and V. S. Bagnato, Universal dy- namics of a turbulent superfluid Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 106, 023314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    S. Erne, R. B¨ ucker, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, Universal dynamics in an isolated one- dimensional Bose gas far from equilibrium, Nature563, 225 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Liang, R

    Q. Liang, R. Wu, P. Paranjape, B. Schittenkopf, C. Li, J. Schmiedmayer, and S. Erne, Universal non-thermal fixed point for quasi-1d Bose gases, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20213 (2025), see also the experimental crossover scaling analysis therein

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Madeira and V

    L. Madeira and V. S. Bagnato, Non-thermal fixed points in Bose gas experiments, Symmetry14, 10.3390/sym14040678 (2022)

    work page doi:10.3390/sym14040678 2022

  41. [41]

    A. N. Mikheev, I. Siovitz, and T. Gasenzer, Universal dynamics and non-thermal fixed points in quantum fluids far from equilibrium, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.232, 3393 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Martirosyan, M

    G. Martirosyan, M. Gazo, J. Etrych, S. M. Fischer, S. J. Morris, C. J. Ho, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, A univer- sal speed limit for spreading of coherence, Nature647, 608 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    C.-F. A. Chen, A. Lucas, and C. Yin, Speed limits and locality in many-body quantum dynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys.86, 116001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  45. [45]

    H. T. C. Stoof, Formation of the condensate in a dilute Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3148 (1991). 25

    work page 1991

  46. [46]

    B. V. Svistunov, Highly nonequilibrium Bose condensa- tion in a weakly interacting gas, J. Moscow Phys. Soc.1, 373 (1991)

    work page 1991

  47. [47]

    Kagan, B

    Y. Kagan, B. V. Svistunov, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Ki- netics of Bose condensation in an interacting Bose gas, Sov. Phys. JETP75, 387 (1992)

    work page 1992

  48. [48]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Condensate turbulence in a weakly cou- pled boson gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 202 (1967)

    work page 1967

  49. [49]

    Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence(Springer, 2011)

    S. Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence(Springer, 2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Gliott, C

    E. Gliott, C. Piekarski, and N. Cherroret, Coarsening of binary Bose superfluids: An effective theory, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033189 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Berges, G

    J. Berges, G. S. Denicol, M. P. Heller, and T. Preis, Far from equilibrium hydrodynamics of nonthermal fixed points, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18754 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18754 2025

  52. [52]

    Li, X.-H

    H. Li, X.-H. Yu, M. Nakagawa, and M. Ueda, Ward-Takahashi identity and gauge-Invariant response theory for open quantum systems, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2602.13632 (2026)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13632 2026

  53. [53]

    Mittal, T

    R. Mittal, T. Zander, J. Lang, and S. Diehl, Fermion quantum criticality far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. X 16, 011069 (2026)

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Con- densation and Superfluidity, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Zhai,Ultracold Atomic Physics(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2021)

    H. Zhai,Ultracold Atomic Physics(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    work page 1965

  57. [57]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    L. M. Sieberer, A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, U. C. T¨ auber, and S. Diehl, Thermodynamic equilibrium as a symmetry of the schwinger-keldysh action, Phys. Rev. B 92, 134307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    A. N. Mikheev, J. Berges, and T. Gasenzer, Non- equilibrium quantum fields in the classical statistical ap- proach, Ann. Phys.405, 50 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Dynamical universality in a driven quantum fluid of light

    I. Gnusov, P. Comaron, A. Gianfrate, D. Trypoge- orgos, M. H. Szymanska, P. Cazzato, M. D. Giorgi, D. Sanvitto, and D. Ballarini, Dynamical universal- ity in a driven quantum fluid of light, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2605.02397 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.02397 2026

  61. [61]

    S. J. Morris, M. Gazo, S. M. Fischer, H. Zhang, C. J. Ho, N. R. Cooper, C. Eigen, and Z. Hadzibabic, Obser- vation of vinen turbulence during far-from-equilibrium Bose–Einstein condensation in a homogeneous gas, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2604.28191 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.28191 2026

  62. [62]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    work page 1977

  63. [63]

    B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, Theory of two- dimensional melting, Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 121 (1978)

    work page 1978

  64. [64]

    D. R. Nelson,Defects and Geometry in Condensed Mat- ter Physics, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2002) Chap. 2

    work page 2002

  65. [65]

    Durnin, M

    J. Durnin, M. J. Bhaseen, and B. Doyon, Nonequilib- rium dynamics and weakly broken integrability, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 130601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Fujii and T

    K. Fujii and T. Enss, Hydrodynamic attractor in ultra- cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 173402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Phys. Rep.12, 75 (1974)

    work page 1974

  68. [68]

    S. Sab, M. A. Moreno-Armijos, A. D. Garc´ ıa-Orozco, G. V. Fernandes, Y. Zhu, A. R. Fritsch, H. Perrin, S. Nazarenko, and V. S. Bagnato, Universal behavior on the relaxation dynamics of far-from-equilibrium quantum fluids, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02182 (2026)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.02182 2026

  69. [69]

    Lannig, M

    S. Lannig, M. Pr¨ ufer, Y. Deller, I. Siovitz, J. Dreher, T. Gasenzer, H. Strobel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Ob- servation of two non-thermal fixed points for the same microscopic symmetry, arXiv preprint (2023), arXiv:2306.16497

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Kaschewski, A

    N. Kaschewski, A. Pelster, and C. A. R. S´ a de Melo, Equal-spin and opposite-spin density-density correlations in the BCS-BEC crossover: Gauge Symmetry, Pauli Exclusion Principle, Wick’s Theorem and Experiments, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2602.23019 (2026)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.23019 2026

  71. [71]

    Forster, D

    D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. J. Stephen, Large- distance and long-time properties of a randomly stirred fluid, Phys. Rev. A16, 732 (1977)

    work page 1977