pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12042 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Emergent Vortex Ordering in a Multiflavor Pyrochlore-Lattice Compound GeCo₂O₄

Fabio Orlandi, Jiajun Mo, Kazuki Iida, Kazuya Kamazawa, Oksana Zaharko, Otkur Omar, Shang Gao, Shuangkui Guang, Shunhong Zhang, Wenyun Yang, Xiaobai Ma, Xiquan Zheng, Xuefeng Sun, Yingying Peng, Yuan Xiao

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords vortex latticeKitaev interactionspyrochlore latticeneutron scatteringgeometric frustrationpseudospinsmultiflavor magnetismfrustrated magnets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kitaev interactions stabilize an emergent vortex lattice in GeCo₂O₄

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the multiflavor pyrochlore compound GeCo₂O₄ develops an emergent vortex lattice through entangled spin and orbital degrees of freedom. Neutron scattering experiments analyzed with a regularized regression framework identify substantial Kitaev interactions among nearest-neighbor Co²⁺ pseudospins. These interactions cooperate with the geometric frustration of the pyrochlore lattice to produce the vortex order. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a concrete route to vortex states in three-dimensional magnets that involve Kitaev physics, distinct from simpler spin systems. The work also supplies a practical regression-based method to determine interaction Hamiltonians in other frustrated quantum materials.

Core claim

The authors report the experimental identification of an emergent vortex lattice in the multiflavor pyrochlore-lattice compound GeCo₂O₄. By combining comprehensive neutron scattering experiments with a regularized regression framework, they identify substantial Kitaev interactions among the nearest-neighboring Co²⁺ pseudospins, which cooperate with geometric frustration to stabilize the vortex order. These results reveal an unexpected route to vortex-lattice order in a three-dimensional Kitaev-frustrated magnet and demonstrate a regularized protocol for Hamiltonian determination in frustrated quantum materials.

What carries the argument

Substantial Kitaev interactions among nearest-neighbor Co²⁺ pseudospins that cooperate with geometric frustration on the pyrochlore lattice to stabilize vortex ordering

If this is right

  • Vortex-lattice order can emerge in three-dimensional Kitaev-frustrated magnets via the interplay of Kitaev couplings and geometric frustration.
  • Multiflavor systems with spin-orbital entanglement host magnetic states inaccessible in conventional spin-only models.
  • A regularized regression protocol can determine Hamiltonian parameters from scattering data in other frustrated quantum materials.
  • The vortex order in GeCo₂O₄ is specifically stabilized by the identified nearest-neighbor Kitaev terms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same combination of Kitaev terms and frustration may produce vortex order in other pyrochlore compounds with strong spin-orbit coupling.
  • Regression-based analysis of scattering data could reveal hidden Kitaev physics in additional three-dimensional frustrated magnets.
  • Multiflavor entanglement may enable further complex magnetic orders beyond the vortex lattice reported here.

Load-bearing premise

The regularized regression framework correctly isolates the Kitaev terms from the neutron scattering data and rules out alternative interactions or higher-order effects that could produce the same vortex pattern.

What would settle it

A neutron scattering measurement or model calculation that reproduces the observed vortex pattern in the absence of substantial Kitaev interactions would disprove the stabilization claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12042 by Fabio Orlandi, Jiajun Mo, Kazuki Iida, Kazuya Kamazawa, Oksana Zaharko, Otkur Omar, Shang Gao, Shuangkui Guang, Shunhong Zhang, Wenyun Yang, Xiaobai Ma, Xiquan Zheng, Xuefeng Sun, Yingying Peng, Yuan Xiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic plot of the pyrochlore lattice formed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Neutron diffraction pattern for powder GeCo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a-c) Single-crystal INS spectra for GeCo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Pareto front obtained from two-target fitting for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic response of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Entangled spin and orbital degrees of freedom provide a multiflavor route to novel magnetic states inaccessible in conventional spin systems. Here, we report the experimental identification of an emergent vortex lattice in the multiflavor pyrochlore-lattice compound GeCo$_2$O$_4$. By combining comprehensive neutron scattering experiments with a regularized regression framework, we identify substantial Kitaev interactions among the nearest-neighboring Co$^{2+}$ pseudospins, which cooperate with geometric frustration to stabilize the vortex order. These results reveal an unexpected route to vortex-lattice order in a three-dimensional Kitaev-frustrated magnet and demonstrate a regularized protocol for Hamiltonian determination in frustrated quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports neutron scattering experiments on the multiflavor pyrochlore compound GeCo₂O₄ that identify an emergent vortex lattice. A regularized regression framework applied to the scattering data extracts substantial nearest-neighbor Kitaev interactions among Co²⁺ pseudospins; these are argued to cooperate with geometric frustration to stabilize the observed vortex order. The work positions this as a new route to vortex-lattice order in three-dimensional Kitaev-frustrated magnets and as a general protocol for Hamiltonian determination in frustrated quantum materials.

Significance. If the regression-based identification of Kitaev terms is robust, the result is significant because it shows how entangled spin-orbital (multiflavor) degrees of freedom can generate novel ordered states on the pyrochlore lattice that are inaccessible in conventional spin-only models. The experimental vortex lattice adds a concrete example to the growing catalog of Kitaev physics beyond two-dimensional honeycomb systems, while the regularized-regression protocol, if validated, offers a practical tool for extracting microscopic interactions from scattering data in other frustrated materials.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that nearest-neighbor Kitaev interactions stabilize the vortex order rests on the regularized regression framework uniquely recovering those terms from the measured structure factor. No cross-validation against synthetic structure factors generated from plausible alternative Hamiltonians (e.g., Heisenberg plus Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya or longer-range exchanges) is described; without such tests it is unclear whether other interaction sets could reproduce the data equally well. This validation step is load-bearing for the assertion that Kitaev terms are required.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the regression identifies 'substantial' Kitaev interactions but does not quote the numerical values, their uncertainties, or the regularization strength used; these should be reported explicitly with error estimates.
  2. Figure captions and the main text should clarify the temperature and field conditions under which the vortex lattice is observed and whether the order is long-range or short-range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the concern regarding validation of the regression framework below and will incorporate the suggested cross-validation in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that nearest-neighbor Kitaev interactions stabilize the vortex order rests on the regularized regression framework uniquely recovering those terms from the measured structure factor. No cross-validation against synthetic structure factors generated from plausible alternative Hamiltonians (e.g., Heisenberg plus Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya or longer-range exchanges) is described; without such tests it is unclear whether other interaction sets could reproduce the data equally well. This validation step is load-bearing for the assertion that Kitaev terms are required.

    Authors: We agree that explicit cross-validation against synthetic data from alternative Hamiltonians is important to establish that the recovered Kitaev terms are not an artifact of the regression procedure. The original manuscript did not include such tests. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection and supplementary figure showing the following: (i) synthetic structure factors generated from nearest-neighbor Heisenberg + Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya models and from models with additional longer-range exchanges; (ii) application of the identical regularized regression pipeline to these synthetic data, which recovers only the input interactions and yields negligible Kitaev coefficients; and (iii) direct comparison of fit quality, demonstrating that models lacking Kitaev terms produce systematically worse agreement with the experimental structure factor. These results confirm that the Kitaev terms are required by the data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; regression extracts parameters from data without reducing to self-definition

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from neutron scattering measurements of the vortex order, through a regularized regression procedure that fits interaction parameters to the observed structure factor, to the conclusion that nearest-neighbor Kitaev terms (plus known pyrochlore frustration) stabilize the order. This is a standard data-driven Hamiltonian extraction; the fitted parameters are not renamed as independent predictions, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and no equation is shown to be equivalent to its input by construction. The derivation remains self-contained against the external neutron data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the observed neutron scattering pattern is produced by a nearest-neighbor Kitaev-plus-Heisenberg model on the pyrochlore lattice and that the regularized regression recovers the true interaction parameters without significant bias from omitted terms or data selection.

free parameters (1)
  • regularization strength
    The regression framework requires at least one tunable regularization hyperparameter whose value is not stated in the abstract and must be chosen to produce the reported Kitaev dominance.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Geometric frustration on the pyrochlore lattice prevents conventional magnetic order and favors complex states such as vortex lattices when combined with anisotropic interactions.
    Invoked to explain why Kitaev terms can stabilize the observed vortex order rather than other magnetic structures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1336 out tokens · 45087 ms · 2026-05-13T04:14:12.884125+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As schematically illus- trated in Fig

    with an unquenched effective orbital angular momentum (|L eff|= 1). As schematically illus- trated in Fig. 1(b), the SOC,H SOC =λL eff ·S, lifts the degeneracy of the spin-orbital manifold, leading to three multiplets characterized by the total effective an- gular momentumJ eff = 1 2, 3 2, and 5 2. Previous inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experi- ments...

    work page

  2. [2]

    [60, 61]. As expected for aJ 1-J3 pyrochlore-lattice model with domi- nant ferromagneticJ 1 interactions [70], short-range spin correlations survive at temperatures up to 100 K, which aligns with the Weiss temperature of Θ∼81 K fitted from the magnetic susceptibility measurements [71, 72]. In Figs. 2(b-e), the left halves present the single-crystal diffus...

    work page

  3. [3]

    For the multiflavor model, the fitted parameters are scaled by a factor of 3 according to the ratio of its spin size compared to that of the effective spin- 1 2 model. Model Type Parameters (meV) spin- 1 2 model JA 1 JK 1 J3a JA 3b JK 3b JC 3b JD 3b −5.60(7) 3.54(17) 0.47(1) 1.81(3)−1.97(7) 0.48(3) 1.98(6) multiflavor model 3JA 1 3JK 1 3J3a 3JA 3b 3JK 3b ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Measurements were performed atT= 2 K by ramping up the field to the designated strengths up to 3 T, all below the meta-magnetic transition reported at 4.2 T [81]

    andQ 4 = (− 1 2 , 1 2 , 1 2) reflections, which belong to theq 1 andq 4 arms, respec- tively. Measurements were performed atT= 2 K by ramping up the field to the designated strengths up to 3 T, all below the meta-magnetic transition reported at 4.2 T [81]. The suppressedq 1 arm and enhancedq 4 arm strongly support the double-Q scenario. Figure 5(c) sum- m...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Or- dered moments within a kagome layer and its two neigh- boring triangular layers are indicated by solid and open arrows, respectively

    andq 3 = ( 1 2 ,− 1 2 , 1 2). Or- dered moments within a kagome layer and its two neigh- boring triangular layers are indicated by solid and open arrows, respectively. This double-Q order, described by theC a2/cmagnetic space group [65], emerges as the zero- field magnetic ground state of the fitted Hamiltonian, and is consistent with neutron diffraction ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    andQ 4 = (− 1 2 , 1 2 , 1

    work page

  7. [7]

    reflections, which belong to theq 1 andq 4 arms, respectively. (c) Field dependence of the integrated intensities forQ 1 = (− 5 2 , 3 2 , 3 2), Q2 = ( 1 2 , 1 2 ,− 1 2),Q 3 = ( 1 2 ,− 1 2 , 1 2), andQ 4 = (− 1 2 , 1 2 , 1 2), which belong toq 1,q 2,q 3, andq 4 arms, respectively. (d) The vortex lattice formed by pseudospins viewed along the [111] directio...

    work page

  8. [8]

    implies unequal ordered mo- ments within a single-Q structure, suggesting the natu- ral tendency toward multi-Q orders in pyrochlore systems hosting similar types of propagation vectors [46, 88–90]. While geometric frustration inherent to the pyrochlore lattice drives the double-Q order, the specific vortex lattice demonstrated in GeCo 2O4 is selected by ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Fazekas,Lecture notes on electron correlation and magnetism, Vol

    P. Fazekas,Lecture notes on electron correlation and magnetism, Vol. 5 (World scientific, 1999)

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1039 (1998)

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    Tokura, S

    Y. Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Multiferroics of spin origin, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 076501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    N. A. Spaldin and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelec- tric multiferroics, Nat. Mater.18, 203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    K. I. Kugel and D. Khomskii, The Jahn-Teller effect and magnetism: transition metal compounds, Sov. Phys. Us- pekhi25, 231 (1982)

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    Joshi, M

    A. Joshi, M. Ma, F. Mila, D. N. Shi, and F. C. Zhang, Elementary excitations in magnetically ordered systems with orbital degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B60, 6584 (1999)

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    G. V. Chen and C. Wu, Multiflavor mott insulators in quantum materials and ultracold atoms, npj Quantum Mater.9, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Takagi, T

    H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 264 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Matsuda, T

    Y. Matsuda, T. Shibauchi, and H.-Y. Kee, Kitaev quan- tum spin liquids, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 045003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    H. Liu, J. c. v. Chaloupka, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev spin liquid in 3dtransition metal compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Shangguan, S

    Y. Shangguan, S. Bao, Z.-Y. Dong, N. Xi, Y.-P. Gao, Z. Ma, W. Wang, Z. Qi, S. Zhang, Z. Huang, J. Liao, X. Zhao, B. Zhang, S. Cheng, H. Xu, D. Yu, R. A. Mole, N. Murai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, L. He, J. Hao, Q.-B. Yan, F. Song, W. Li, S.-L. Yu, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, A one- third magnetization plateau phase as evidence for the Ki- taev interaction in a honeycom...

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Z. Chen, B. Zhang, W. Zhu, L. Li, B. Liu, J. Feng, C. Xu, and H. Xiang, Strength of Kitaev Interaction in Na3Co2SbO6 and Na3Ni2BiO6 (2024), arXiv:2406.03338 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Y. Gu, Y. Gu, F. Liu, S. Ohira-Kawamura, N. Murai, and J. Zhao, Signatures of Kitaev interactions in the van der waals ferromagnet VI3, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 246702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    I. Lee, F. G. Utermohlen, D. Weber, K. Hwang, C. Zhang, J. van Tol, J. E. Goldberger, N. Trivedi, and P. C. Hammel, Fundamental spin interactions underlying the magnetic anisotropy in the Kitaev ferromagnet CrI 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 017201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Bandyopadhyay, F

    S. Bandyopadhyay, F. L. Buessen, R. Das, F. G. Uter- mohlen, N. Trivedi, A. Paramekanti, and I. Dasgupta, Exchange interactions and spin dynamics in the layered honeycomb ferromagnet CrI3, Phys. Rev. B105, 184430 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Songvilay, S

    M. Songvilay, S. Petit, J. Rodriguez-Rivera, W. Rat- cliff, F. Damay, V. Bal´ edent, M. Jim´ enez-Ruiz, P. Lejay, E. Pachoud,et al., Kitaev interactions in the co honey- comb antiferromagnets Na 3Co2SbO6 and Na 2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B102, 224429 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Motome, R

    Y. Motome, R. Sano, S. Jang, Y. Sugita, and Y. Kato, Materials design of kitaev spin liquids beyond the jack- eli–khaliullin mechanism, J. Phys.: Condensed Matt.32, 404001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    G. Lin, J. Jeong, C. Kim, Y. Wang, Q. Huang, T. Ma- suda, S. Asai, S. Itoh, G. G¨ unther, M. Russina,et al., Field-induced quantum spin disordered state in spin- 1/2 honeycomb magnet Na2Co2TeO6, Nat. Commun.12, 5559 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    W. Yao, K. Iida, K. Kamazawa, and Y. Li, Excitations in the ordered and paramagnetic states of honeycomb mag- net Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 147202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    X. Li, Y. Gu, Y. Chen, V. O. Garlea, K. Iida, K. Ka- mazawa, Y. Li, G. Deng, Q. Xiao, X. Zheng, Z. Ye, Y. Peng, I. A. Zaliznyak, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Li, Giant magnetic in-plane anisotropy and competing insta- bilities in Na3Co2SbO6, Phys. Rev. X12, 041024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Liu and G

    H. Liu and G. Khaliullin, Pseudospin exchange interac- tions ind 7 cobalt compounds: Possible realization of the Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B97, 014407 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    R. Sano, Y. Kato, and Y. Motome, Kitaev-Heisenberg hamiltonian for high-spind 7 mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B97, 014408 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    S. M. Winter, Magnetic couplings in edge-sharing high- spind 7 compounds, J. Phys. Mater.5, 045003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    B. S. Mou, X. Zhang, L. Xiang, Y. Xu, R. Zhong, R. J. Cava, H. Zhou, Z. Jiang, D. Smirnov, N. Drichko, and S. M. Winter, Comparative raman scattering study of crystal field excitations in Co-based quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 084408 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Zhong, T

    R. Zhong, T. Gao, N. P. Ong, and Robert J. Cava, Weak- field induced nonmagnetic state in a Co-based honey- comb, Sci. Adv.6, eaay6953 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    P. A. Maksimov, S. Jiang, L. P. Regnault, and A. L. Chernyshev, Strong Kitaev interaction in BaCo2(AsO4)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Xiang, R

    L. Xiang, R. Dhakal, M. Ozerov, Y. Jiang, B. S. Mou, A. Ozarowski, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, J. Fang, S. M. Win- ter, Z. Jiang, and D. Smirnov, Disorder-enriched mag- netic excitations in a Heisenberg-Kitaev quantum mag- net Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Bischof, J

    L. Bischof, J. Arneth, R. Kalaivanan, R. Sankar, K.-Y. Choi, and R. Klingeler, Spin waves in Na2Co2TeO6 stud- ied by high-frequency/high-field ESR: Successes and fail- ures of the triple-q model, Phys. Rev. B112, 104406 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    B. Yuan, I. Khait, G.-J. Shu, F. C. Chou, M. B. Stone, J. P. Clancy, A. Paramekanti, and Y.-J. Kim, Dirac magnons in a honeycomb lattice quantum XY magnet CoTiO3, Phys. Rev. X10, 011062 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Sheng, L

    J. Sheng, L. Wang, A. Candini, W. Jiang, L. Huang, B. Xi, J. Zhao, H. Ge, N. Zhao, Y. Fu, J. Ren, J. Yang, P. Miao, X. Tong, D. Yu, S. Wang, Q. Liu, M. Kofu, R. Mole, G. Biasiol, D. Yu, I. A. Zaliznyak, J.-W. Mei, and L. Wu, Two-dimensional quantum universal- ity in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice quantum antifer- romagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Proc. Natl. Acad...

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Xiang, C

    J. Xiang, C. Zhang, Y. Gao, W. Schmidt, K. Schmalzl, C.-W. Wang, B. Li, N. Xi, X.-Y. Liu, H. Jin, G. Li, J. Shen, Z. Chen, Y. Qi, Y. Wan, W. Jin, W. Li, P. Sun, and G. Su, Giant magnetocaloric effect in spin supersolid 10 candidate Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Nature625, 270 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    A. R. Wildes, B. F˚ ak, U. B. Hansen, M. Enderle, J. R. Stewart, L. Testa, H. M. Rønnow, C. Kim, and J.-G. Park, Spin wave spectra of single crystal CoPS 3, Phys. Rev. B107, 054438 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    C. Kim, S. Kim, P. Park, T. Kim, J. Jeong, S. Ohira- Kawamura, N. Murai, K. Nakajima, A. L. Chernyshev, M. Mourigal, S.-J. Kim, and J.-G. Park, Bond-dependent anisotropy and magnon decay in cobalt-based Kitaev tri- angular antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.19, 1624 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    C. M. Morris, N. Desai, J. Viirok, D. H¨ uvonen, U. Nagel, T. R˜ o˜ om, J. W. Krizan, R. J. Cava, T. M. McQueen, S. M. Koohpayeh, R. K. Kaul, and N. P. Armitage, Du- ality and domain wall dynamics in a twisted Kitaev chain, Nat. Phys.17, 832 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Churchill and H.-Y

    D. Churchill and H.-Y. Kee, Transforming from kitaev to disguised Ising chain: Application to CoNb 2O6, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    A. A. Konieczna, D. A. S. Kaib, S. M. Winter, and R. Va- lent´ ı, Understanding the microscopic origin of the mag- netic interactions in CoNb2O6, npj Quantum Mater.10, 8 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    W. G. F. Kr¨ uger, W. Chen, X. Jin, Y. Li, and L. Janssen, Triple-qorder in Na 2Co2TeO6 from proximity to hidden- SU(2)-symmetric point, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 146702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    X. Jin, M. Geng, F. Orlandi, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, Y. Liu, and Y. Li, Robust triple-qmagnetic order with trainable spin vorticity in Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 136701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Zhang, S

    S. Zhang, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, W. K. Peria, S. M. Thomas, R. Movshovich, E. Brosha, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, V. S. Zapf, and M. Lee, Electronic and magnetic phase diagrams of the Kitaev quantum spin liquid candidate Na2Co2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B108, 064421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    J. Jiao, X. Li, G. Lin, M. Shu, W. Xu, O. Zaharko, T. Shi- roka, T. Hong, A. I. Kolesnikov, G. Deng, S. Dunsiger, M. C. Aronson, H. Zhou, X. Wang, T. Shang, and J. Ma, Static magnetic order with strong quantum fluctuations in spin-1/2 honeycomb magnet Na 2Co2TeO6, Commun. Mater.5, 159 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    S. Gao, O. Zaharko, V. Tsurkan, Y. Su, J. S. White, G. S. Tucker, B. Roessli, F. Bourdarot, R. Sibille, D. Chernyshov, T. Fennell, A. Loidl, and C. R¨ uegg, Spi- ral spin-liquid and the emergence of a vortex-like state in MnSc2S4, Nat. Phys.13, 157 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    spin meta-cholesteric

    N. D. Andriushin, J. Muller, N. S. Pavlovskii, J. Grum- bach, S. Granovsky, Y. V. Tymoshenko, O. Zaharko, A. Ivanov, J. Ollivier, M. Doerr, B. Keimer, M. Mostovoy, D. S. Inosov, and D. C. Peets, Reentrant multiple-q magnetic order and a “spin meta-cholesteric” phase in Sr3Fe2O7, npj Quantum Mater.9, 84 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    S. Gao, H. D. Rosales, F. A. G´ omez Albarrac´ ın, V. Tsurkan, G. Kaur, T. Fennell, P. Steffens, M. Boehm, P. ˇCerm´ ak, A. Schneidewind, E. Ressouche, D. C. Cabra, C. R¨ uegg, and O. Zaharko, Fractional antiferromagnetic skyrmion lattice induced by anisotropic couplings, Na- ture586, 37 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    J. A. Paddison, G. Ehlers, A. B. Cairns, J. S. Gard- ner, O. A. Petrenko, N. P. Butch, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, H. E. Fischer, H. Zhou,et al., Suppressed- moment 2-k order in the canonical frustrated antiferro- magnet Gd2Ti2O7, npj Quantum Mater.6, 99 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    J. A. M. Paddison, H. Zhang, J. Yan, M. J. Cliffe, M. A. McGuire, S.-H. Do, S. Gao, M. B. Stone, D. Dahlbom, K. Barros, C. D. Batista, and A. D. Christianson, Cubic double perovskites host noncoplanar spin textures, npj Quantum Mater.9, 48 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    J. Mo, L. M. Chinellato, F. Williams, A. Kikkawa, J. A. M. Paddison, M. D. Frontzek, G. Sala, C. Pasco, K. Barros, T. Nakajima, T.-h. Arima, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, M. B. Stone, A. D. Christianson, C. D. Batista, and S. Gao, Skyrmion and meron crystals in in- termetallic Gd3Ru4Al12: Microscopic model insights into chiral phases (2025), arXiv:2512.24071 [co...

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    N. D. Andriushin, J. Grumbach, A. A. Kulbakov, Y. V. Tymoshenko, Y. A. Onykiienko, R. Firouzmandi, E. Cheng, S. Granovsky, Y. Skourski, J. Ollivier, H. C. Walker, V. Kocsis, B. B¨ uchner, B. Keimer, M. Doerr, D. S. Inosov, and D. C. Peets, Anomalous quasielastic scattering contribution in the centrosymmetric multi-q helimagnet srfeo3, Phys. Rev. X15, 0110...

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    K. A. Ross, L. Savary, B. D. Gaulin, and L. Balents, Quantum excitations in quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 056501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, L. Jaubert, and N. Shannon, The- ory of multiple-phase competition in pyrochlore magnets with anisotropic exchange with application to Yb2Ti2O7, Er2Ti2O7, and Er 2Sn2O7, Phys. Rev. B95, 094422 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    J. W. Krizan and R. J. Cava, NaCaCo 2F7: A single- crystal high-temperature pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev.B89, 214401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    K. A. Ross, J. W. Krizan, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, R. J. Cava, and C. L. Broholm, Static and dynamic XY-like short-range order in a frustrated magnet with exchange disorder, Phys. Rev. B93, 014433 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    K. A. Ross, J. M. Brown, R. J. Cava, J. W. Krizan, S. E. Nagler, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, and M. B. Stone, Single-ion properties of theS eff = 1 2 XY antiferromag- netic pyrochlores NaA ′ Co2F7 (A ′ = Ca2+,Sr 2+), Phys. Rev. B95, 144414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    B. A. Frandsen, K. A. Ross, J. W. Krizan, G. J. Nilsen, A. R. Wildes, R. J. Cava, R. J. Birgeneau, and S. J. Billinge, Real-space investigation of short-range mag- netic correlations in fluoride pyrochlores NaCaCo 2F7 and NaSrCo2F7 with magnetic pair distribution function analysis, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 074412 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon hall effect, Science329, 297 (2010)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    M. Mena, R. S. Perry, T. G. Perring, M. D. Le, S. Guer- rero, M. Storni, D. T. Adroja, C. R¨ uegg, and D. F. Mc- Morrow, Spin-wave spectrum of the quantum ferromag- net on the pyrochlore lattice Lu 2V2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 047202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    K. W. Plumb, H. J. Changlani, A. Scheie, S. Zhang, J. W. Krizan, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, Y. Qiu, B. Winn, R. J. Cava, and C. L. Broholm, Continuum of quantum fluctu- ations in a three-dimensionalS= 1 Heisenberg magnet, Nat. Phys.15, 54 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    S. Diaz, S. De Brion, G. Chouteau, B. Canals, V. Si- 11 monet, and P. Strobel, Magnetic frustration in the spinel compounds GeCo 2O4 and GeNi 2O4, Phys. Rev. B74, 092404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    Matsuda, T

    M. Matsuda, T. Hoshi, H. Aruga Katori, M. Kosaka, and H. Takagi, Magnetic-field-induced transitions in spinel GeCo2O4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 034708 (2011)

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Fabr` eges, E

    X. Fabr` eges, E. Ressouche, F. Duc, S. De Brion, M. Amara, C. Detlefs, L. Paolasini, E. Suard, L.-P. Reg- nault, B. Canals, P. Strobel, and V. Simonet, Field- driven magnetostructural transitions in GeCo 2O4, Phys. Rev. B95, 014428 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Tomiyasu, M

    K. Tomiyasu, M. K. Crawford, D. T. Adroja, P. Manuel, A. Tominaga, S. Hara, H. Sato, T. Watanabe, S. I. Ikeda, J. W. Lynn, K. Iwasa, and K. Yamada, Molec- ular spin-orbit excitations in thej eff = 1/2 frustrated spinel GeCo2O4, Phys. Rev. B84, 054405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    Kajimoto, M

    R. Kajimoto, M. Nakamura, Y. Inamura, F. Mizuno, K. Nakajima, S. Ohira-Kawamura, T. Yokoo, T. Nakatani, R. Maruyama, K. Soyama, K. Shibata, K. Suzuya, S. Sato, K. Aizawa, M. Arai, S. Wakimoto, M. Ishikado, S.-i. Shamoto, M. Fujita, H. Hiraka, K. Ohoyama, K. Yamada, and C.-H. Lee, The fermi chopper spectrometer 4SEASONS at J-PARC, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, SB0...

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    See Supplemental Material for details on sample prepa- ration and characterizations, experimental methods, and calculation methods

    work page

  74. [74]

    com/spintoolkit-dev/SpinToolkit_py(2026)

    SpinToolkit Developers, SpinToolkit,https://github. com/spintoolkit-dev/SpinToolkit_py(2026)

    work page 2026

  75. [75]

    L. Xu, X. Shi, Y. Jiao, J. Yang, L. Yang, and Z. Wang, In preparation, (2026)

    work page 2026

  76. [76]

    Bai, S.-S

    X. Bai, S.-S. Zhang, Z. Dun, H. Zhang, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, F. Ye, C. D. Batista, and M. Mourigal, Hybridized quadrupolar ex- citations in the spin-anisotropic frustrated magnet FeI 2, Nat. Phys.17, 467 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    S. Gao, M. A. McGuire, Y. Liu, D. L. Abernathy, M. B. Stone, and A. D. Christianson, Spiral spin liquid on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 227201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    S. Gao, G. Pokharel, A. F. May, J. A. M. Paddison, C. Pasco, Y. Liu, K. M. Taddei, S. Calder, D. G. Man- drus, M. B. Stone, and A. D. Christianson, Line-graph approach to spiral spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 237202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    S. Diaz, S. De Brion, M. Holzapfel, G. Chouteau, and P. Strobel, Study of competitive magnetic interactions in the spinel compounds GeNi 2O4, GeCo 2O4, Physica B: Condensed Matter346–347, 146 (2004)

    work page 2004

  80. [80]

    J. C. Lashley, R. Stevens, M. K. Crawford, J. Boerio- Goates, B. F. Woodfield, Y. Qiu, J. W. Lynn, P. A. God- dard, and R. A. Fisher, Specific heat and magnetic sus- ceptibility of the spinels GeNi 2O4 and GeCo 2O4, Phys. Rev.B78, 104406 (2008)

    work page 2008

Showing first 80 references.