pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12082 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Finite element and box-method discretizations for fractional elliptic problems with quadrature and mass lumping

Alexandre B. Simas, David Bolin, Kelvin J. R. Almeida-Sousa

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords fractional elliptic problemsfinite element methodbox methodmass lumpingquadratureerror estimatesfractional powers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mass lumping produces the intrinsic fractional box discretization of elliptic operators within a unified admissible inner product framework.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a single conforming piecewise linear framework in which the discrete fractional operator is obtained by raising the solution operator to the power beta with respect to any admissible inner product on the trial space. This construction simultaneously covers the standard finite element discretization (using the L2 inner product) and the box-method discretization, and it shows that the mass-lumped inner product recovers exactly the fractional power of the underlying non-fractional box operator. Error estimates between the continuous and discrete solutions are derived for both realizations, with the box-method bound made explicit about the additional error introduced by quadrature of the load term. The resulting schemes are directly usable for practical computation of fractional elliptic problems.

Core claim

The discrete fractional operator is defined by taking the beta-power of the discrete solution operator associated with an admissible inner product on the piecewise linear trial space. The standard L2 inner product recovers the usual finite element discretization of the fractional problem, while the quadrature-based mass-lumped inner product recovers the intrinsic fractional box discretization obtained by raising the non-fractional box solution operator to the power beta. Under natural consistency assumptions on the inner products and quadrature rules, both discretizations satisfy error estimates that make the quadrature contribution explicit in the box case.

What carries the argument

admissible inner product on the trial space - any inner product on the piecewise linear finite element space that is equivalent to the L2 inner product and includes both the standard L2 product and the mass-lumped quadrature product as special cases, used to define the discrete solution operator whose beta-power yields the fractional discretization.

If this is right

  • The mass-lumped finite element discretization coincides exactly with the intrinsic fractional box discretization.
  • Error bounds hold for both finite element and box realizations under the same consistency assumptions on the inner product and quadrature.
  • The additional error from load quadrature appears explicitly in the box-method error estimate.
  • A continuous family of admissible inner products interpolates between the finite element and mass-lumped extremes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing non-fractional box-method codes could be reused for fractional problems simply by computing matrix powers of the discrete solution operator.
  • The same admissible-inner-product construction could be tested on finite-volume or discontinuous Galerkin spaces to obtain analogous intrinsic fractional versions.
  • Numerical checks in three dimensions or on locally refined meshes would test whether the consistency assumptions remain sufficient outside the one- and two-dimensional experiments reported.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen inner products on the discrete space must be admissible and the quadrature rules must satisfy the natural consistency conditions needed for the error estimates.

What would settle it

Direct matrix computation on a uniform one-dimensional mesh showing that the mass-lumped discrete fractional operator differs from the beta-power of the non-fractional box solution operator would falsify the claimed equivalence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12082 by Alexandre B. Simas, David Bolin, Kelvin J. R. Almeida-Sousa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Polygonal region Az(K), in the case d = 2, where q1 and q2 are the barycenter (midpoints) of the edges that contains z and q3 is the barycenter of K itself. z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: One-dimensional indicator load. Left: L 2 (S) error versus the number of degrees of freedom. Right: experimental orders of convergence for the finite-element and box-method discretizations compared with the theoretical slope min{2β + 1/2, 2}. 5.2 A singular power load in one dimension Our second one-dimensional test uses f(x) = x −0.499 on S = (0, 1) with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. In this … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: One-dimensional singular load f(x) = x −0.499. Left: L 2 (S) error versus the number of degrees of freedom. Right: experimental slopes compared with the theoretical prediction. 101 102 10−5 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 DOF s ∥uβ − uβ,h∥L2(S) experiment results for d = 2 β 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.5 2 β Slopes theoretical vs experimental EOC-0 EOC-1 EOC-L2 TOC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two-dimensional checkerboard load. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze numerical approximation of the fractional elliptic problem $L^{\beta}u=f$, ${\beta>0}$, where $L$ is a second-order self-adjoint elliptic operator with homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions. The paper develops a unified conforming piecewise linear framework that covers both the standard finite element discretization and the box-method discretization of fractional powers. The key point is that the discrete fractional operator is defined with respect to an admissible inner product on the trial space. This includes, in particular, the standard $L^{2}$ inner product and the quadrature-based mass-lumped inner product, and we also identify a broader family of admissible inner products interpolating between these two realizations. Within this framework, we show that the mass-lumped choice yields the intrinsic fractional box discretization, namely the one obtained by taking fractional powers of the nonfractional box solution operator. For both the finite element and box-method realizations, we establish error estimates under natural consistency assumptions, making explicit the effect of load quadrature in the box case. The analysis applies directly to practical schemes and is supported by numerical experiments in one and two space dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified conforming piecewise linear framework for discretizing the fractional elliptic problem L^β u = f (β > 0) by defining the discrete fractional operator via admissible inner products on the trial space. This covers both standard finite-element and box-method realizations, with the mass-lumped inner product shown to recover the intrinsic fractional box discretization (fractional power of the non-fractional box solution operator). Error estimates are derived for both methods under natural consistency assumptions, with the effect of load quadrature isolated in the box case; the analysis is supported by numerical experiments in one and two space dimensions.

Significance. If the error estimates hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a coherent mathematical foundation that unifies two standard discretization families for fractional powers of elliptic operators while making the role of quadrature and mass lumping explicit. This is valuable for both theoretical analysis and practical implementation of nonlocal problems, and the provision of numerical validation strengthens its utility.

minor comments (2)
  1. The precise statement of the 'natural consistency assumptions' (mentioned in the abstract) should be collected in one location with explicit dependence on mesh size and quadrature rules so that the error bounds can be verified without cross-referencing multiple sections.
  2. Notation for the admissible inner products and the discrete fractional operator should be introduced with a single table or diagram that contrasts the L2, lumped, and interpolating cases to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments appear in the report, so there are no specific points requiring point-by-point response. We will incorporate any minor editorial or presentational improvements in the revised manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs the discrete fractional operator directly from admissible inner products on the trial space (including L2 and mass-lumped variants), verifies that the mass-lumped case recovers the intrinsic fractional box discretization by definition within the framework, and derives error estimates under explicit natural consistency assumptions. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The argument relies on standard conforming finite-element and box-method analysis without circular closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the definition of admissible inner products and the invocation of natural consistency assumptions whose precise content is not given in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Natural consistency assumptions on load quadrature and inner-product admissibility
    Invoked to obtain the error estimates for both realizations; exact statement not supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1320 out tokens · 69804 ms · 2026-05-13T04:19:24.513749+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Acta Numerica , volume=

    Numerical methods for nonlocal and fractional models , author=. Acta Numerica , volume=

    work page

  2. [2]

    SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Error estimates for the optimal control of a parabolic fractional PDE , author=. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Communications in partial differential equations , volume=

    An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian , author=. Communications in partial differential equations , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , volume=

    Regularity theory and extension problem for fractional nonlocal parabolic equations and the master equation , author=. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , volume=

    work page

  5. [5]

    IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Numerical approximation of fractional powers of elliptic operators , author=. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , volume=

    work page

  6. [7]

    Numerische Mathematik , volume=

    A sharp interface method using enriched finite elements for elliptic interface problems , author=. Numerische Mathematik , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  7. [8]

    Computing , volume=

    On first and second order box schemes , author=. Computing , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    work page 1989

  8. [10]

    Spatial Mat

    Bolin, David , journal=. Spatial Mat. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  9. [11]

    IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , volume=

    Numerical solution of fractional elliptic stochastic PDEs with spatial white noise , author=. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2020 , publisher=. doi:10.1093/imanum/dry091

    work page doi:10.1093/imanum/dry091 2020

  10. [12]

    Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=

    The rational SPDE approach for Gaussian random fields with general smoothness , author=. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  11. [13]

    Covariance--based rational approximations of fractional SPDEs for computationally efficient Bayesian inference , volume =

    Bolin, David and Simas, Alexandre B and Xiong, Zhen , doi =. Covariance--based rational approximations of fractional SPDEs for computationally efficient Bayesian inference , volume =. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , number =

    work page

  12. [14]

    Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods , volume=

    Convolution-invariant subclasses of generalized hyperbolic distributions , author=. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  13. [15]

    Extremes , volume=

    A class of non-Gaussian second order random fields , author=. Extremes , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  14. [16]

    Probability Theory and Related Fields , volume=

    Spectral representations of infinitely divisible processes , author=. Probability Theory and Related Fields , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    work page 1989

  15. [17]

    The domain of definition of the L

    Fageot, Julien and Humeau, Thomas , journal=. The domain of definition of the L. 2021 , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.spa.2021.01.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.spa.2021.01.007 2021

  16. [18]

    Random Measures, Theory and Applications

    Kallenberg, Olav. Random Measures, Theory and Applications. 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41598-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41598-7 2017

  17. [23]

    Mathematika , volume=

    Interpolation of Hilbert and Sobolev spaces: quantitative estimates and counterexamples , author=. Mathematika , volume=. 2015 , publisher=. doi:10.1112/S0025579314000278

    work page doi:10.1112/s0025579314000278 2015

  18. [24]

    2002 , publisher=

    The finite element method for elliptic problems , author=. 2002 , publisher=

    work page 2002

  19. [25]

    Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute , volume=

    Stochastic-processes in several dimensions , author=. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute , volume=. 1963 , publisher=

    work page 1963

  20. [26]

    Stochastic models and their application to some problems in forest surveys and other sampling investigations

    Spatial variation. Stochastic models and their application to some problems in forest surveys and other sampling investigations. , author=

    work page

  21. [27]

    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics , pages=

    Blackbox kriging: spatial prediction without specifying variogram models , author=. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics , pages=. 1996 , publisher=

    work page 1996

  22. [28]

    Proceedings of the 56th Session of the International Statistics Institute , pages=

    Some topics in convolution-based spatial modeling , author=. Proceedings of the 56th Session of the International Statistics Institute , pages=. 2007 , publisher=

    work page 2007

  23. [29]

    Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=

    Covariance tapering for interpolation of large spatial datasets , author=. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  24. [30]

    Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=

    Compactly supported correlation functions , author=. Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    work page 2002

  25. [31]

    Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=

    A comparison between Markov approximations and other methods for large spatial data sets , author=. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  26. [32]

    Geostatistical modelling using non-Gaussian Mat

    Wallin, Jonas and Bolin, David , journal=. Geostatistical modelling using non-Gaussian Mat. 2015 , publisher=. doi:10.1111/sjos.12141

    work page doi:10.1111/sjos.12141 2015

  27. [33]

    Spatial Mat

    Bolin, David , journal=. Spatial Mat. 2014 , publisher=. doi:10.1111/sjos.12046

    work page doi:10.1111/sjos.12046 2014

  28. [34]

    Statistica Sinica , pages=

    Exploring a new class of non-stationary spatial Gaussian random fields with varying local anisotropy , author=. Statistica Sinica , pages=. 2015 , publisher=. doi:10.5705/ss.2013.106w

    work page doi:10.5705/ss.2013.106w 2015

  29. [35]

    Topics in numerical analysis , pages=

    The use of numerical integration in finite element methods for solving parabolic equations , author=. Topics in numerical analysis , pages=

    work page

  30. [36]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume=

    Orthogonally scattered measures , author=. Advances in Mathematics , volume=. 1968 , publisher=. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(68)90018-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0001-8708(68)90018-2 1968

  31. [40]

    2011 , doi =

    Grisvard, Pierre , title =. 2011 , doi =

    work page 2011

  32. [41]

    Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , volume=

    Normal Inverse Gaussian Distributions and Stochastic Volatility Modelling , author=. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , volume=. 1997 , publisher=. doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00045

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00045 1997

  33. [42]

    Correlation structure of time-changed L

    Leonenko, Nikolai N and Meerschaert, Mark M and Schilling, Ren. Correlation structure of time-changed L. Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics , volume=

    work page

  34. [43]

    SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=

    On the accuracy of the finite volume element method based on piecewise linear polynomials , author=. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    work page 2002

  35. [45]

    Finite Element Methods (Part 1) , publisher=

    Evolution problems , author=. Finite Element Methods (Part 1) , publisher=. 1991 , pages=

    work page 1991

  36. [47]

    2008 , doi =

    Strang, Gilbert and Fix, George , title =. 2008 , doi =

    work page 2008

  37. [48]

    Some Error Estimates for the Finite Volume Element Method for a Parabolic Problem , title =

    Panagiotis Chatzipantelidis and Raytcho Lazarov and Vidar Thomée , pages =. Some Error Estimates for the Finite Volume Element Method for a Parabolic Problem , title =. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics , doi =. 2013 , lastchecked =

    work page 2013

  38. [51]

    2006 , ISBN =

    Haase, Markus , title =. 2006 , ISBN =

    work page 2006

  39. [53]

    Almeida-Sousa, Kelvin J. R. and Bolin, David and Simas, Alexandre B. , title =. 2026 , howpublished =

    work page 2026

  40. [54]

    K. J. R. Almeida-Sousa, D. Bolin, and A. B. Simas , fractional\_box\_experiments . https://github.com/KJhonson/fractional_box_experiments, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-10

    work page 2026

  41. [55]

    R. E. Bank and D. J. Rose , Some error estimates for the box method , SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 24 (1987), pp. 777--787, https://doi.org/10.1137/0724050

    work page doi:10.1137/0724050 1987

  42. [56]

    Bolin and K

    D. Bolin and K. Kirchner , The rational spde approach for gaussian random fields with general smoothness , Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 29 (2020), pp. 274--285

    work page 2020

  43. [57]

    Bolin, A

    D. Bolin, A. B. Simas, and Z. Xiong , Covariance--based rational approximations of fractional spdes for computationally efficient bayesian inference , Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 33 (2024), pp. 64--74, https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2023.2231051

    work page doi:10.1080/10618600.2023.2231051 2024

  44. [58]

    Bonito and J

    A. Bonito and J. Pasciak , Numerical approximation of fractional powers of elliptic operators , Mathematics of Computation, 84 (2015), pp. 2083--2110, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-2015-02937-8

    work page doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-2015-02937-8 2015

  45. [59]

    S. C. Brenner and L. R. Scott , The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods , Springer New York, New York, NY, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0 2008

  46. [60]

    Caffarelli and L

    L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre , An extension problem related to the fractional laplacian , Communications in partial differential equations, 32 (2007), pp. 1245--1260

    work page 2007

  47. [61]

    Chatzipantelidis , Finite volume methods for elliptic pde's: a new approach , ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 36 (2002), pp

    P. Chatzipantelidis , Finite volume methods for elliptic pde's: a new approach , ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 36 (2002), pp. 307--324, https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an:2002014

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an:2002014 2002

  48. [62]

    Chou and Q

    S.-H. Chou and Q. Li , Error estimates in L ^ 2 , H ^ 1 and L ^ in covolume methods for elliptic and parabolic problems: a unified approach , Mathematics of Computation, 69 (2000), pp. 103--120, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01192-8

    work page doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-99-01192-8 2000

  49. [63]

    P. G. Ciarlet , The finite element method for elliptic problems , SIAM, 2002

    work page 2002

  50. [64]

    S. G. Cox and K. Kirchner , Regularity and convergence analysis in sobolev and h \"o lder spaces for generalized whittle--mat \'e rn fields , Numerische Mathematik, 146 (2020), pp. 819--873, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-020-01151-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00211-020-01151-x 2020

  51. [65]

    Q. Du, M. Gunzburger, R. B. Lehoucq, and K. Zhou , Numerical methods for nonlocal and fractional models , Acta Numerica, 29 (2020), pp. 1--124

    work page 2020

  52. [66]

    R. E. Ewing, T. Lin, and Y. Lin , On the accuracy of the finite volume element method based on piecewise linear polynomials , SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 39 (2002), pp. 1865--1888, https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036142900368873, http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/s0036142900368873

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036142900368873 2002

  53. [67]

    G. J. Fix , Effects of quadrature errors in finite element approximation of steady state, eigenvalue and parabolic problems , in The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations, A. Aziz, ed., Academic Press, 1972, pp. 525--556, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-068650-6.50024-1,...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-068650-6.50024-1 1972

  54. [68]

    Fujita and T

    H. Fujita and T. Suzuki , Evolution problems , Elsevier, 1991, pp. 789--928, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-8659(05)80043-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1570-8659(05)80043-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s1570-8659(05)80043-2 1991

  55. [69]

    Glusa and E

    C. Glusa and E. Ot \'a rola , Error estimates for the optimal control of a parabolic fractional pde , SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59 (2021), pp. 1140--1165

    work page 2021

  56. [70]

    Haase , The Functional Calculus for Sectorial Operators , Birkh \"a user Basel, Basel, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7698-8

    M. Haase , The Functional Calculus for Sectorial Operators , Birkh \"a user Basel, Basel, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7698-8

    work page doi:10.1007/3-7643-7698-8 2006

  57. [71]

    Hackbusch , On first and second order box schemes , Computing, 41 (1989), pp

    W. Hackbusch , On first and second order box schemes , Computing, 41 (1989), pp. 277--296

    work page 1989

  58. [72]

    Harizanov, R

    S. Harizanov, R. Lazarov, P. Marinov, J. Pasciak, and P. Vassilevski , Numerical approximation of fractional powers of elliptic operators , IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40 (2020), pp. 1746--1792

    work page 2020

  59. [73]

    H \"o llbacher and G

    S. H \"o llbacher and G. Wittum , A sharp interface method using enriched finite elements for elliptic interface problems , Numerische Mathematik, 147 (2021), pp. 759--781

    work page 2021

  60. [74]

    Jianguo and X

    H. Jianguo and X. Shitong , On the finite volume element method for general self-adjoint elliptic problems , SIAM journal on numerical analysis, 35 (1998), pp. 1762--1774, https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142994264699

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036142994264699 1998

  61. [75]

    Jin and Z

    B. Jin and Z. Zhou , Numerical Treatment and Analysis of Time-Fractional Evolution Equations , Springer International Publishing, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21050-1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21050-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21050-1 2023

  62. [76]

    Liang, X

    S. Liang, X. Ma, and A. Zhou , Finite volume methods for eigenvalue problems , BIT Numerical Mathematics, 41 (2001), pp. 345--363, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021946607960, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021946607960

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1021946607960 2001

  63. [77]

    Lindgren, H

    F. Lindgren, H. Rue, and J. Lindstr \"o m , An explicit link between gaussian fields and gaussian markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 73 (2011), pp. 423--498, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x 2011

  64. [78]

    P. R. Stinga and J. L. Torrea , Regularity theory and extension problem for fractional nonlocal parabolic equations and the master equation , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 49 (2017), pp. 3893--3924

    work page 2017

  65. [79]

    Strang and G

    G. Strang and G. Fix , An Analysis of the Finite Element Methods, New Edition , Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Philadelphia, PA, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780980232707, https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9780980232707, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780980232707

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9780980232707 2008

  66. [80]

    Thom \'e e , Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Problems , Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33122-0_15

    V. Thom \'e e , Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Problems , Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33122-0_15

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-33122-0_15 2006

  67. [81]

    Y. Voet, E. Sande, and A. Buffa , A mathematical theory for mass lumping and its generalization with applications to isogeometric analysis , Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 410 (2023), p. 116033, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116033 2023