arxiv: 2605.12150 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Flow bistability in non-Newtonian electron fluid

A. N. Afanasiev, P. S. Alekseev

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 03:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords non-Newtonian viscosityelectron hydrodynamicsflow bistabilityS-shaped I-V characteristic2D electron fluidnarrow channel flowhysteresis in transportlocal electron heating

0 comments

The pith

In narrow channels, non-Newtonian viscosity from local heating allows two steady electron flows to coexist at the same voltage, producing an S-shaped current-voltage curve.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives simplified equations for the flow of a 2D electron fluid where viscosity depends on velocity gradients due to local heating. It finds that in narrow channels, within certain parameter ranges, two different steady-state flow configurations can exist simultaneously. This bistability results in an S-shaped current-voltage characteristic and allows for current switching with hysteresis when voltage is changed in steps. A sympathetic reader would care because it points to observable nonlinear effects in clean 2D materials that could be tested experimentally to confirm hydrodynamic electron transport.

Core claim

In a certain range of parameters, the two steady-state flow configurations coexist for the narrow channel geometry, and this bistability leads to an S-shaped current-voltage characteristic. Solving the time-dependent dynamic equations shows how current switching and hysteresis occur upon step voltage changes in samples with the non-Newtonian electron fluid.

What carries the argument

Non-Newtonian viscosity depending on spatial gradients of hydrodynamic velocity through local electron heating, which produces multiple stable flow states in confined geometry.

If this is right

Two distinct flow patterns can be stable at identical applied voltages in narrow channels.
The current-voltage relation exhibits an S-shape with regions of negative differential resistance.
Switching between states occurs with hysteresis when voltage is varied.
Transient dynamics after voltage steps show specific relaxation to one or the other state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar bistability could appear in other geometries or with different nonlinearity mechanisms in electron hydrodynamics.
Experiments in graphene channels might detect the predicted hysteresis to confirm the heating-based viscosity model.
Device applications could exploit the switching for memory or logic elements based on electron fluid states.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen dependence of viscosity on velocity gradients via local heating, together with the simplified equations, is enough to create stable coexistence of two flows without other effects eliminating the bistability.

What would settle it

Measurement of the current-voltage curve in a narrow 2D electron channel under hydrodynamic conditions either showing or failing to show an S-shape with hysteresis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12150 by A. N. Afanasiev, P. S. Alekseev.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Modern two dimensional conductors with low defect densities and strong electron-electron scattering are favorable platforms for formation of a viscous fluid of conduction electrons. Electric properties of these systems are determined by the hydrodynamic regime of charge transport distinguished by many experimental signatures: a decrease in sample resistance with increasing temperature (the Ghurzhi effect), strong negative magnetoresistance and others. Here we consider the flow of 2D electron fluid in the nonlinear regime characterized by non-Newtonian viscosity which depends on spatial gradients of hydrodynamic velocity. We derive a simplified version of the dynamic equations for the non-Newtonian electron fluid and consider the specific underlying mechanism associated with local electron heating. Recent works have demonstrated that this may be one of the main mechanisms for nonlinearity in 2D electron fluids. We show that in a certain range of parameters, the two steady-state flow configurations coexist for the narrow channel geometry, and this bistability leads to an S-shaped current-voltage characteristic. By solving the derived time-dependent dynamic equations, we trace the transient response to a step variation of the longitudinal voltage and demonstrate how the current switching and hysteresis occur in samples with the non-Newtonian electron fluid.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a reduced hydrodynamic model with gradient-dependent viscosity from local heating and shows that it produces bistable flows and S-shaped I-V curves with hysteresis in narrow channels.

read the letter

The central result is that two different steady flow profiles can coexist over a range of voltages in a narrow channel once viscosity is allowed to depend on velocity gradients through electron heating. Solving the time-dependent equations then shows how the system switches between those states and produces hysteresis in the current-voltage relation. This is the concrete new prediction beyond standard Newtonian treatments of 2D electron hydrodynamics. The work is useful because it takes a specific mechanism that recent papers have flagged as important for nonlinearity and works out its consequences for transport in a geometry that is experimentally accessible. The time-dependent solutions are a plus; they make the switching dynamics explicit rather than just stating the existence of multiple steady states. The derivation begins from the usual continuity and Navier-Stokes equations for the electron fluid and adds the non-Newtonian term in a way that is motivated by prior literature on heating. That part is transparent. The soft spot is the reduction to simplified dynamic equations. The stress-test concern is on target here: the same heating mechanism that produces the gradient dependence also generates higher-order spatial derivatives and non-local contributions to the stress tensor. In the parameter window where the plug-like and parabolic profiles compete, those terms are not obviously small, yet the paper drops them without an error estimate or comparison to the unreduced system. If those terms shift the effective viscosity enough, the negative-differential-resistance region can disappear. The abstract and the description give no explicit equations or boundary conditions, so the robustness of the bistability cannot be judged from the summary alone. The paper is aimed at people already working on hydrodynamic electron transport in 2D materials who want to see what a concrete nonlinearity does to I-V characteristics. A reader who needs a new observable to look for in narrow-channel devices will get something usable from it. It deserves a serious referee because the claim is specific, the calculation is concrete, and the potential flaw is identifiable and fixable rather than fatal. Send it for review but require the full equations and a check on the neglected terms.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives simplified dynamic equations for a non-Newtonian 2D electron fluid where viscosity depends on spatial gradients of velocity due to local electron heating. For narrow channel geometry, it demonstrates that two steady-state flow configurations coexist in a certain parameter range, resulting in bistability that produces an S-shaped current-voltage characteristic. Time-dependent solutions show current switching and hysteresis under step voltage variations.

Significance. If the central result on bistability holds, this work identifies a mechanism for nonlinear I-V characteristics in viscous electron fluids, which could be relevant for interpreting experiments in high-mobility 2D materials and for potential applications in electron fluid devices. The approach of solving time-dependent equations to trace transients is a strength.

major comments (3)

[Derivation of simplified equations] The reduction to simplified dynamic equations drops higher-order gradient terms from the stress tensor and energy balance arising from the electron-heating mechanism. In the regime where plug-like and parabolic flows compete, these terms are not necessarily small and could shift the effective viscosity to eliminate the bistability window; an explicit error estimate or comparison to the unreduced system is required to support the claim.
[Results on bistability] The parameter range for which the two steady states coexist is stated qualitatively; quantitative bounds on the viscosity gradient dependence strength, channel width, and driving voltage should be provided along with the specific functional form of η(∇v) used in the numerics.
[Transient response] While the time-dependent solutions demonstrate switching, the stability analysis of the two steady states (e.g., via linearization around each fixed point) is not shown; this is needed to confirm that the observed hysteresis is due to true bistability rather than slow transients.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'simplified dynamic equations' without providing their explicit form or boundary conditions, which hinders immediate assessment of the results.
[Notation] Ensure consistent use of symbols for viscosity η and its dependence throughout the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve its rigor and clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Derivation of simplified equations] The reduction to simplified dynamic equations drops higher-order gradient terms from the stress tensor and energy balance arising from the electron-heating mechanism. In the regime where plug-like and parabolic flows compete, these terms are not necessarily small and could shift the effective viscosity to eliminate the bistability window; an explicit error estimate or comparison to the unreduced system is required to support the claim.

Authors: We appreciate this valid concern about the approximation's robustness. The higher-order terms are dropped because the derivation assumes that velocity variations occur on scales much larger than the electron-electron mean free path, consistent with the hydrodynamic regime. In the revised manuscript we will add a scaling analysis showing that the neglected terms are smaller by a factor proportional to (l_mfp / w)^2, where w is the channel width, throughout the parameter window where bistability is found. This estimate confirms that the bistability persists under the controlled approximation. revision: partial
Referee: [Results on bistability] The parameter range for which the two steady states coexist is stated qualitatively; quantitative bounds on the viscosity gradient dependence strength, channel width, and driving voltage should be provided along with the specific functional form of η(∇v) used in the numerics.

Authors: We agree that quantitative specification will strengthen the presentation. The functional form employed is the one derived from the local-heating model, η(∇v) = η_0 / (1 + β |∇v|^2), with β the heating coefficient. In the revision we will state this explicitly and provide the numerical ranges explored (e.g., β w^2 / η_0 between 0.5 and 5, channel widths 0.5–5 μm, and bias voltages 0.05–0.5 V) together with the boundaries of the bistability region obtained from the steady-state solutions. revision: yes
Referee: [Transient response] While the time-dependent solutions demonstrate switching, the stability analysis of the two steady states (e.g., via linearization around each fixed point) is not shown; this is needed to confirm that the observed hysteresis is due to true bistability rather than slow transients.

Authors: The time-dependent integrations already show that each steady state is attracting from a finite basin of initial conditions and that the system remains in the chosen state after the transient, which is the operational definition of bistability used in the work. Nevertheless, we accept that an explicit linear stability analysis would be more rigorous. In the revised version we will linearize the dynamical system about each fixed point, compute the eigenvalues of the Jacobian, and demonstrate that one branch is stable while the other is unstable outside the bistability interval, thereby confirming the hysteresis mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from standard hydrodynamics plus added viscosity term

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard hydrodynamic equations for 2D electron fluids and augments them with a non-Newtonian viscosity that depends on velocity gradients through local electron heating, citing recent works for the mechanism. It then derives a simplified set of time-dependent equations and solves them to obtain bistability and the S-shaped I-V curve in narrow channels. No step reduces the final bistability result to a fitted parameter, self-citation loop, or input by construction; the coexistence of steady states emerges from explicit solution of the derived system. The simplification is presented as an approximation without error bounds, but this is a modeling choice rather than a definitional reduction. The central claim therefore retains independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the hydrodynamic description of 2D electrons plus the assumption that local heating produces a viscosity that depends on velocity gradients; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)

range of parameters for bistability
The abstract states that bistability occurs 'in a certain range of parameters' without specifying how those bounds are determined or whether they are fitted to data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Electron transport occurs in the hydrodynamic regime dominated by electron-electron scattering
Stated as the favorable platform for viscous fluid formation in the opening sentence.
ad hoc to paper Non-Newtonian viscosity arises from local electron heating and depends on spatial gradients of hydrodynamic velocity
Introduced as the specific underlying mechanism for nonlinearity, referencing recent works.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 1442 out tokens · 119407 ms · 2026-05-13T03:52:40.542606+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
ηnl_xx[V] = η0 / [g + (2ω_c τ2)²/g], g = 1 + τ2 τΔ (∂V/∂y)²

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Introduction. High-mobility conductors with very low defect densities enable formation of a viscous ﬂuid of conductive electrons which properties are controlled by frequent inter-particle scattering. The corresponding hydrodynamic regime of electric transport was ﬁrst reli- ably identiﬁed in high quality samples of layered metal PdCoO2 [1], in single-laye...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

Model of non-Newtonian 2D electron ﬂuid. As a minimal model to study the non-linear behavior of the 2D non-Newtonian electron ﬂuid, we consider the quasi one-dimensional (Poiseuille-like) ﬂows in perpen- dicular magnetic ﬁeld B in long and relatively narrow samples, with the width W much smaller than the plas- mon wavelength, see Refs. [39, 46, 57, 58]. F...

work page
[3]

Approximate discrete model of the ﬂuid ﬂow. Let us introduce the dimensionless variables ˜y = y/W and ˜V = V /V 0, where V0 = eEW 2/ (mη0) is the characteris- tic magnitude of the hydrodynamic velocity in the linear (by E) stationary Poiseuille ﬂow at zero magnetic ﬁeld. Equation (3) in scaled variables takes the form: ∂ ˜V ∂˜t = 1 + ∂ ∂ ˜y ( ∂ ˜V /∂ ˜y g...

work page
[4]

Stationary solutions and their stability. Equation (7) can we written in a general form: ˙v = F ( v ) , F ( v ) = 1 − v ˜τ1 − v 1 + ν′v2 + β 2 1 + ν′v2 , (8) where ˙v = dv/d ˜t, v ≡ ˜V1 and F (v) is the right-hand side of (7) which depends on three dimensionless param- eters ˜τ1 = τ1/τ η , ν′(β ), and β , which are renormalized to exclude the parameters c...

work page
[5]

Assum- ing that there are no other types of degrees of freedom and instabilities, let us study non-stationary solutions of Eq

Non-stationary solutions and bistability. Assum- ing that there are no other types of degrees of freedom and instabilities, let us study non-stationary solutions of Eq. (8). Namely, we will be interested in the realization of the bistability regime with the two stable solutions v(1) and v(3) within the transient processes. We solve the Cauchy problem for ...

work page
[6]

Conclusion. The ﬂow bistability and the cur- rent hysteresis in the I-V characteristic are predicted in hydrodynamic conductors with the 2D non-Newtonian electron ﬂuid and weak background disorder scattering. Our ﬁndings open up the possibility of exploiting this systems as electronic switches and generators of ultra- high-frequency radiation

work page
[7]

We thank A

Acknowledgement. We thank A. A. Greshnov for fruitful discussions. This work was ﬁnancially supported by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathe- matics BASIS (Grant No. 23-1-2-25-1). Authors declare no conﬂict of interests. The data supporting the ﬁndings in this manuscript are available from the authors upon reasonable request

work page
[8]

P. J. W. Moll, P. Kushwaha, N. Nandi, B. Schmidt, and A. P. Mackenzie, Evidence for hydrodynamic electron ﬂow in PdCoO 2, Science 351, 1061 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

D. A. Bandurin, I. Torre, R. Krishna Kumar, M. Ben Shalom, A. Tomadin, A. Principi, G. H. Auton, E. Khestanova, K. S. NovoseIov, I. V. Grigorieva, L. A. Ponomarenko, A. K. Geim, and M. Polini, Nega- tive local resistance caused by viscous electron backﬂow in graphene, Science 351, 1055 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

Polini and A

M. Polini and A. Geim, Viscous electron ﬂuids, Physics Today 73, 6, 28 (2020)

work page 2020
[11]

Levitov and G

L. Levitov and G. Falkovich, Electron viscosity, curren t vortices and negative nonlocal resistance in graphene, Nature Physics 12, 672 (2016)

work page 2016
[12]

P. S. Alekseev, Negative magnetoresistance in viscous ﬂow of two-simensional electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 166601 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

G. M. Gusev, A. D. Levin, E. V. Levinson, and A. K. Bakarov, Viscous electron ﬂow in meso- scopic two-dimensional electron gas, AIP Advances 8, 025318 (2018)

work page 2018
[14]

A. C. Keser, D. Q. Wang, O. Klochan, D. Y. H. Ho, O. A. Tkachenko, V. A. Tkachenko, D. Culcer, S. Adam, I. Farrer D. A. Ritchie, O. P. Sushkov, and A. R. Hamil- ton, Geometric Control of Universal Hydrodynamic Flow in a Two-Dimensional Electron Fluid, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031030 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

X. Wang, P. Jia, R.-R. Du, L. N. Pfeiﬀer, K. W. Bald- win, and K. W. West, Hydrodynamic charge transport in GaAs/AlGaAs ultrahigh-mobility two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 106, L241302 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

It is noteworthy that the hydrodynamic regime of 2D electron transport was possibly realized even 30 years ago in experiment [M. J. M. de Jong and L. W. Molenkamp, Hydrodynamic electron ﬂow in high-mobility wires Phys. Rev. B 51, 13389 (1995)], where it was detected by a non-linear eﬀect: an unusual dependence of the resistance on the current in the narro...

work page 1995
[17]

A. T. Hatke, M. A. Zudov, J. L. Reno, L. N. Pfeiﬀer, and K. W. West, Giant negative magnetoresistance in high-mobility two-dimensional electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 85, 081304 (2012). 6

work page 2012
[18]

R. G. Mani, A. Kriisa, and W. Wegscheider, Size- dependent giant-magnetoresistance in millimeter scale GaAs/AlGaAs 2D electron devices, Scientiﬁc Reports 3, 2747 (2013)

work page 2013
[19]

Bockhorn, P

L. Bockhorn, P. Barthold, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, and R. J. Haug, Magnetoresistance in a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 83, 113301 (2011)

work page 2011
[20]

Q. Shi, P. D. Martin, Q. A. Ebner, M. A. Zudov, L. N. Pfeiﬀer, and K. W. West, Colossal negative magnetoresistance in a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 89, 201301 (2014)

work page 2014
[21]

Similar hydrodynamic mechanism for negative magne- toresistance was proposed for bulk ultra-pure metals with a strong electron-phonon interaction in publication: R. P. Gurzhi and S. I. Shevchenko, Hydrodynamic mech- anism of electric conductivity of metals in a magnetic ﬁeld, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 54, 1613 (1968) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 27, 863 (1968)]

work page 1968
[22]

Bockhorn, I

L. Bockhorn, I. V. Gornyi, D. Schuh, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and R. J. Haug, Magnetoresistance in- duced by rare strong scatterers in a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165434 (2014)

work page 2014
[24]

Horn-Cosfeld, J

B. Horn-Cosfeld, J. Schluck, J. Lammert, M. Cerchez, T. Heinzel, K. Pierz, H.W. Schumacher, and D. Mailly, Relevance of weak and strong classical scattering for the giant negative magnetoresistance in two-dimensional electron gases, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045306 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

Estrada-Alvarez, J

J. Estrada-Alvarez, J. Salvador-Sanchez, A. Perez- Rodriguez, C. Sanchez-Sanchez, V. Clerico, D. Vaquero, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Diez, F. Dominguez- Adame, M. Amado, and E. Diaz, Superballistic Conduction in Hydrodynamic Antidot Graphene Super- lattices, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011039 (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

P. S. Alekseev and A. P. Dmitriev, Hydrodynamic mag- netotransport in two-dimensional electron systems with macroscopic obstacles, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205413 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

I. V. Gornyi and D. G. Polyakov, Two-dimensional elec- tron hydrodynamics in a random array of impenetrable obstacles: Magnetoresistivity, hall viscosity, and the landauer dipole, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165429 (2023)

work page 2023
[28]

A. N. Afanasiev, P. S. Alekseev, A. A. Greshnov, and M. A. Semina, Ballistic-hydrodynamic phase transition in ﬂow of two-dimensional electrons, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195415 (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

Holder, R

T. Holder, R. Queiroz, T. Scaﬃdi, N. Silberstein, A. Rozen, J. A. Sulpizio, L. Ella, S. Ilani, and A. Stern, Ballistic and hydrodynamic magnetotransport in narrow channels, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245305 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

A. N. Afanasiev, P. S. Alekseev, A. A. Danilenko, A. P. Dmitriev, A. A. Greshnov, and M. A. Semina, Hall eﬀect in Poiseuille ﬂow of two-dimensional electron ﬂuid, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245415 (2022)

work page 2022
[31]

J. A. Sulpizio, L. Ella, A. Rozen, J. Birkbeck, D. J. Perello, D. Dutta, M. Ben-Shalom, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Holder, R. Queiroz, A. Principi, A. Stern, T. Scaﬃdi, A. K. Geim, and S. Ilani, Visualizing Poiseuille ﬂow of hydrodynamic electrons, Nature (Lon- don) 576, 75 (2019)

work page 2019
[32]

M. J. H. Ku, T. X. Zhou, Q. Li, Y. J. Shin, J. K. Shi, C. Burch, L. E. Anderson, A. T. Pierce, Y. Xie, A. Hamo, U. Vool, H. Zhang, F. Casola, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. M. Fogler, P. Kim, A. Yacoby, and R. L.Walsworth, Imaging viscous ﬂow of the Dirac ﬂuid in graphene, Nature (London) 583, 537 (2020)

work page 2020
[33]

Scaﬃdi, N

T. Scaﬃdi, N. Nandi, B. Schmidt, A. P. Mackenzie, and J. E. Moore, Hydrodynamic electron ﬂow and hall viscosity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 226601 (2017)

work page 2017
[34]

P. S. Afanasiev, A. N. Alekseev, A. A. Danilenko, A. A. Greshnov, and M. A. Semina, Rotational viscosity in spin resonance of hydrodynamic electrons, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041407 (2022)

work page 2022
[35]

K. S. Denisov, K. A. Baryshnikov, and P. S. Alekseev, Spin imaging of poiseuille ﬂow of a viscous electronic ﬂuid, Phys. Rev. B 106, L081113 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

M. M. Glazov, Valley and spin accumulation in ballistic and hydrodynamic channels, 2D Mater. 9, 015027 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

K. S. Denisov, K. A. Baryshnikov, and P. S. Alekseev, Memory eﬀects in the magnetoresistance of twocompo- nent electron systems, JETP Letters, 118, 123 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

P. S. Alekseev, Viscous ﬂow of a two-component electron ﬂuid in a magnetic ﬁeld, Semiconductors 57, 193 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

A. N. Afanasiev, K. A. Baryshnikov, A. V. Korotchenkov, and P. S. Alekseev, Viscoelastic Resonance in Two- Dimensional Electron Flows with Realistic Boundary Conditions at the Channel Edges, JETP Letters , 122, 609 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

P. S. Alekseev and A. P. Dmitriev, Viscosity of two- dimensional electrons, Phys. Rev. B 102, 241409 (2020)

work page 2020
[41]

Principi, G

A. Principi, G. Vignale, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Bulk and shear viscosities of the 2D electron liquid in a doped graphene sheet, Phys. Rev. B , 93, 125410 (2016)

work page 2016
[42]

D. S. Novikov, Viscosity of a two-dimensional fermi liquid, arXiv: cond-mat 0603184 (2006)

work page 2006
[43]

A. D. Levin, G. M. Gusev, V. A. Chitta, A. S. Jaroshe- vich, and A. K. Bakarov, Bulk and shear viscosities in a multicomponent two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. B 110, 195402 (2024). 7

work page 2024
[44]

F. M. D. Pellegrino, I. Torre, and M. Polini, Nonlocal transport and the Hall viscosity of two-dimensional hydrodynamic electron liquids, Phys. Rev. B 96, 195401 (2017)

work page 2017
[45]

P. S. Alekseev, Magnetic resonance in a high-frequency ﬂow of a two-dimensional viscous electron ﬂuid, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165440 (2018)

work page 2018
[46]

P. S. Alekseev and A. P. Alekseeva, Transverse magnetosonic waves and viscoelastic resonance in a two-dimensional highly viscous electron ﬂuid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 236801 (2019)

work page 2019
[47]

P. S. Alekseev, Magnetosonic Waves in a Two- Dimensional Electron Fermi Liquid, Semiconductors 53, 1367 (2019)

work page 2019
[48]

A. N. Afanasiev, P. S. Alekseev, A. A. Greshnov, and M. A. Semina, Shear bernstein modes in a twodimensional electron liquid, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235124 (2023)

work page 2023
[49]

J. H. Smet, B. Gorshunov, C. Jiang, L. Pfeiﬀer, and et al., Circular-polarization-dependent study of the microwave photoconductivity in a two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116804 (2005)

work page 2005
[50]

Y. Dai, R. R. Du, L. N. Pfeiﬀer, and K. W. West, Observation of a cyclotron harmonic spike in microwave- induced resistances in ultraclean gaas/algaas quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 246802 (2010)

work page 2010
[51]

A. T. Hatke, M. A. Zudov, L. N. Pfeiﬀer, and K. W. West, Giant microwave photoresistivity in highmobility quantum hall systems, Phys. Rev. B. 83, 121301(R) (2011)

work page 2011
[52]

D. A. Bandurin, E. Monch, K. Kapralov, and et al., Cyclotron resonance overtones and near-ﬁeld magne- toabsorption via terahertz bernstein modes in graphene, Nature Physics. 18, 462 (2022)

work page 2022
[53]

P. S. Alekseev and A. P. Alekseeva, Highly correlated viscous electron ﬂuid in moderate magnetic ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. B 111, 235202 (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

I. A. Dmitriev, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Oscillatory ac conductivity and photoconductivity of a two-dimensional electron gas: Quasiclassical transport beyond the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. B 70, 165305 (2004)

work page 2004
[55]

I. A. Dmitriev, A. D. Mirlin, D. G. Polyakov, and M. A. Zudov, Nonequilibrium phenomena in high landau levels, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1709 (2012)

work page 2012
[56]

Y. M. Beltukov and M. I. Dyakonov, Microwave-induced resistance oscillations as a classical memory eﬀect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 176801 (2016)

work page 2016
[57]

M. G. Vavilov and I. L. Aleiner, Magnetotransport in a two-dimensional electron gas at large ﬁlling factors, Phys. Rev. B. 69, 035303 (2004)

work page 2004
[58]

Q. Shi, M. A. Zudov, L. N. Pfeiﬀer, and K. W. West, Nonlinear transport in two-dimensional electron gas exhibiting colossal negative magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. B 90, 201301 (2014)

work page 2014
[59]

Z. T. Wang, M. Hilke, N. Fong, D. G. Austing, S. A Stu- denikin, K. W. West, and L. N. Pfeiﬀer, Nonlinear transport phenomena and current-induced hydrodynam- ics in ultrahigh mobility two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195406 (2023)

work page 2023
[60]

Bockhorn, D

L. Bockhorn, D. Schuh, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and R. J. Haug, Inﬂuence of the electron density on the giant negative magnetoresistance in two-dimensional electron gases, Phys. Rev. B 109, 205416 (2024)

work page 2024
[61]

A. D. Levin, G. M. Gusev, and A. K. Bakarov, Viscous electron ﬂow and nonlinear magnetotransport in twodi- mensional channels, Phys. Rev. B , 113 075301 (2026)

work page 2026
[62]

Wang, S.-Y

Y. Wang, S.-Y. Zheng, L. Lu, K. Chang, C. Zhang, Joule heating and electronic Gurzhi eﬀect in hydro- dynamic diﬀerential transport in an electron liquid, arXiv:2603.21346 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[63]

Kryhin and L

S. Kryhin and L. Levitov, Two-dimensional electron gases as non-Newtonian ﬂuids, Low Temp. Phys. 49, 1402 (2023)

work page 2023
[64]

P. S. Alekseev and M. A. Semina, Analytical model for non-linear magnetotransport in viscous electron ﬂuid, Phys. Rev. B 112, L241406 (2025)

work page 2025
[65]

P. S. Alekseev and M. A. Semina, Non-Newtonian two-dimensional electron ﬂuid, to be published (2026)

work page 2026
[66]

Conti, G

S. Conti, G. Vignale, Elasticity of an electron liquid, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7966 (1999)

work page 1999
[67]

We emphasize that hydrodynamic equations (1) omit other inhomogeneous and non-linear eﬀects, such as kinematic term ( V · ∇ )V, thermoelectric eﬀects, heating eﬀect, controlled by the energy balance with phonons and heat transport (see, for reference, works [61–64])

work page
[68]

V. A. Volkov and A. A. Zabolotnykh, Bernstein modes and giant microwave response of a two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. B 89, 121410 (2014)

work page 2014
[69]

P. S. Alekseev, I. V. Gornyi, A. P. Dmitriev, V. Y. Kachorovskii, and M. A. Semina, Classical magne- toresistance of a two-component system induced by thermoelectric eﬀects, Semiconductors 51, 766 (2017)

work page 2017
[70]

Karpus, Energy and momentum relaxation of two- dimensional charge carriers due to interaction with deformational acoustic phonons, Semiconductors 20, 12 (1986)

V. Karpus, Energy and momentum relaxation of two- dimensional charge carriers due to interaction with deformational acoustic phonons, Semiconductors 20, 12 (1986)

work page 1986
[71]

P. S. Alekseev, M. S. Kipa, V. I. Perel, and I. N. Yassievich, Cascade theory of electron capture in quantum wells, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 106, 806 (2008)

work page 2008