pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12229 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation

Enrico Bothmann , Jon Butterworth , Shu Chen , Eda Erdogan , Giovanni Guerrieri , Christian G\"utschow , Martin Habedank , Julie M. Hogan
show 11 more authors
Venus Keus Sabine Kraml Van Dung Le Kati Lassila-Perini Rakhi Mahbubani Zach Marshall Thomas McCauley Tomasz Procter Humberto Reyes-Gonz\'alez Andrzej Siodmok Mariana Vivas Albornoz
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords LHCMonte Carlo event generationopen datahigh energy physicssimulation sharingresource efficiencycomputational savings
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sharing pre-generated LHC Monte Carlo events as open data reduces duplicated computing effort and resource costs across high energy physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews current projects making Monte Carlo event simulations from the LHC available for public reuse instead of regenerating them each time. It presents this open event generation approach as a way to cut repeated work by different groups and lower overall computing demands. Concrete examples of how users have already benefited are included along with estimates of the financial and environmental gains. The review closes by outlining practical next steps for broader adoption.

Core claim

Making LHC Monte Carlo events openly available allows the high energy physics community to reuse existing simulations rather than recompute them, directly lowering duplicated effort and resource consumption while maintaining scientific utility.

What carries the argument

Open Event Generation, the practice of sharing completed Monte Carlo simulation datasets so others can analyze them without rerunning the generation step.

If this is right

  • Groups can complete analyses faster by starting from existing events rather than waiting for new simulations.
  • Overall electricity use and hardware wear from particle physics computing decreases as redundant runs are avoided.
  • Smaller research teams gain access to high-statistics samples they could not afford to generate themselves.
  • Standard formats and repositories for these shared events become more valuable community resources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Wider adoption could shift funding priorities from raw simulation production toward curation and validation of shared datasets.
  • Combining open events with public analysis frameworks might speed up the path from raw data to published results.
  • Environmental accounting of LHC computing would improve if reuse rates were tracked systematically.

Load-bearing premise

That sharing the events through new infrastructure can happen without creating major extra work or problems with data accuracy and versioning.

What would settle it

A documented case where reuse of shared events produced measurably worse physics results or higher total computing costs than independent generation would disprove the benefit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12229 by Andrzej Siodmok, Christian G\"utschow, Eda Erdogan, Enrico Bothmann, Giovanni Guerrieri, Humberto Reyes-Gonz\'alez, Jon Butterworth, Julie M. Hogan, Kati Lassila-Perini, Mariana Vivas Albornoz, Martin Habedank, Rakhi Mahbubani, Sabine Kraml, Shu Chen, Thomas McCauley, Tomasz Procter, Van Dung Le, Venus Keus, Zach Marshall.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) CMS Drell-Yan di-electron and (b) dimuon cross section measurements com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Correlations across all non-empty histograms from 13 TeV ATLAS measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Preliminary plot of “loose” muon pT in a control region consisting of two same-sign muons satisfying all preselection cuts for a proposed LHC search for a two-component scalar dark matter model, for p s = 13 TeV and an integrated luminosity of 300 fb−1 . This control region will be rescaled to p s = 13.6 TeV and used to estimate the rate of non-prompt muon backgrounds to the search. negative or increasing … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of price/performance for installed disk server storage at CERN (2005– 2025), measured in CHF/GB usable space (including mirrored space). The projections ex￾clude recent RAM and storage price fluctuations from AI demand. Figure taken from [123]. reduce the computational, financial, and environmental footprint of MC simulation with no adverse effect on the physics done. This approach comes with a t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The LHC physics programme involves a vast amount of Monte Carlo event simulation. This paper reviews current efforts towards sharing the generated events as Open Data. Open Event Generation helps reduce duplication of effort and resource consumption, and benefits the whole High Energy Physics community. We give examples of use cases and user experiences, discuss financial and environmental savings, and suggest future directions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews current efforts to share LHC Monte Carlo event simulations as Open Data. It claims that Open Event Generation reduces duplication of effort and resource consumption while benefiting the High Energy Physics community overall. The paper summarizes existing projects, presents use cases and user experiences, discusses qualitative financial and environmental savings, and outlines future directions.

Significance. The review provides a useful overview of ongoing open-data initiatives in LHC Monte Carlo generation and explicitly credits collaborative projects aimed at reducing redundant computations. If the advocated sharing practices are widely adopted, they could yield meaningful reductions in computing costs and environmental impact for the LHC program while improving accessibility across the HEP community.

minor comments (2)
  1. The discussion of financial and environmental savings would be strengthened by adding at least one concrete quantitative estimate or reference to an external study, even if only as an illustrative example.
  2. A summary table listing the key open event generation projects, their current status, and main features would improve readability and allow readers to quickly compare the initiatives described.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript on Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation. The review correctly identifies the value of open data initiatives in reducing redundant simulations, computational costs, and environmental impact within the HEP community. We note the recommendation for minor revision but observe that no specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review paper with no derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper summarizing existing open data efforts for LHC Monte Carlo events, presenting use cases, qualitative savings, and future directions. It contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. Central claims rest on descriptive examples from external efforts rather than any self-referential chain or ansatz. The structure is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems invoked.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper with no new derivations, fitted parameters, axioms, or postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5416 in / 876 out tokens · 27149 ms · 2026-05-13T04:38:59.486702+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 197 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Butterworth, S

    J. Butterworth, S. Kraml, H. Prosper et al., Reinterpretation and preservation of data and analyses in HEP (2025), 2504.00256

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Simma, Fair Data and ILDG , Presented at Lattice Practices 2023, DESY, Hamburg, Germany , https://indico.desy.de/event/40590/contributions/149745/ (13 Oct

    H. Simma, Fair Data and ILDG , Presented at Lattice Practices 2023, DESY, Hamburg, Germany , https://indico.desy.de/event/40590/contributions/149745/ (13 Oct. 2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Scientific data3(1), 1–9 (2016)

    M. Wilkinson et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016), doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 2016

  4. [4]

    Karsch, H

    F. Karsch, H. Simma and T. Yoshie, The International Lattice Data Grid -- towards FAIR data , PoS LATTICE2022, 244 (2023), doi:10.22323/1.430.0244, 2212.08392

    work page doi:10.22323/1.430.0244 2023

  5. [5]

    Virgo Consortium , VirgoDB , https://virgodb.dur.ac.uk/

    work page

  6. [6]

    CERN Open Data Portal , https://opendata.cern.ch/ (2026)

    work page 2026

  7. [7]

    Šimko et al., Reana: A system for reusable research data analyses, EPJ Web Conf

    A. Rizzi, G. Petrucciani and M. Peruzzi, A further reduction in CMS event data for analysis: the NANOAOD format , EPJ Web Conf. 214, 06021 (2019), doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921406021

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921406021 2019

  8. [9]

    Dobbs and J

    M. Dobbs and J. B. Hansen, The HepMC C++ Monte Carlo Event Record for High Energy Physics , Tech. Rep. ATL-SOFT-2000-001 https://cds.cern.ch/record/684090, CERN, Geneva (2000)

    work page 2000

  9. [10]

    cernopendata-client, https://cernopendata-client.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html (2026)

    work page 2026

  10. [11]

    Creative Commons , CC0 1.0 UNIVERSAL , https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    work page

  11. [12]

    The ATLAS Open Data team , Citing ATLAS , https://opendata.atlas.cern/docs/documentation/ethical_legal/citation_policy (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [13]

    CMS Data Preservation and Open Access Group , About CMS , https://opendata.cern.ch/docs/about-cms (2026)

    work page 2026

  13. [14]

    Maguire, L

    E. Maguire, L. Heinrich and G. Watt, HEPData: a repository for high energy physics data , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 102006 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/10/102006, 1704.05473

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/10/102006 2017

  14. [15]

    Bailey et al., Data and Analysis Preservation, Recasting, and Reinterpretation (2022), Contribution to Snowmass 2021, 2203.10057

    S. Bailey et al., Data and Analysis Preservation, Recasting, and Reinterpretation (2022), Contribution to Snowmass 2021, 2203.10057

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [16]

    CERN Open Data , Discussion forum , https://opendata-forum.cern.ch/

    work page

  16. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration , DAOD\_PHYSLITE format 2015-2016 Open Data for Research from the ATLAS experiment , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.ATLAS.9HK7.P5SI

    work page doi:10.7483/opendata.atlas.9hk7.p5si 2015

  17. [18]

    ATLAS collaboration , HEPMC format 13 TeV proton-proton Open Data from the ATLAS experiment , 10.7483/OPENDATA.ATLAS.XPJL.4L42 (2025)

    work page doi:10.7483/opendata.atlas.xpjl.4l42 2025

  18. [19]

    Bothmann et al., Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2 , SciPost Phys

    E. Bothmann et al., Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2 , SciPost Phys. 7(3), 034 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034, 1905.09127

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.7.3.034 2019

  19. [20]

    Bothmann et al., Event generation with Sherpa 3 , JHEP 12, 156 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)156, 2410.22148

    E. Bothmann et al., Event generation with Sherpa 3 , JHEP 12, 156 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)156, 2410.22148

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)156 2024

  20. [21]

    Buckley, P

    A. Buckley, P. Ilten, D. Konstantinov, L. L\"onnblad, J. Monk, W. Pokorski, T. Przedzinski and A. Verbytskyi, The HepMC3 event record library for Monte Carlo event generators , Comput. Phys. Commun. 260, 107310 (2021), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107310, 1912.08005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107310 2021

  21. [22]

    Barisits, T

    M. Barisits, T. Beermann, F. Berghaus, B. Bockelman, J. Bogado, D. Cameron, D. Christidis, D. Ciangottini, G. Dimitrov, M. Elsing, V. Garonne, A. di Girolamo et al., Rucio: Scientific data management, Computing and Software for Big Science 3(1) (2019), doi:10.1007/s41781-019-0026-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-019-0026-3 2019

  22. [23]

    Nielsen, R

    H. Nielsen, R. T. Fielding and T. Berners-Lee, Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0 , RFC 1945, doi:10.17487/RFC1945 (1996)

    work page doi:10.17487/rfc1945 1945

  23. [24]

    Dorigo, P

    A. Dorigo, P. Elmer, F. Furano and A. Hanushevsky, Xrootd - a highly scalable architecture for data access, WSEAS Transactions on Computers 4(4), 348 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [25]

    CERN , Computing and networks division, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1540872 (1996)

    work page arXiv 1996

  25. [26]

    Šimko et al., Reana: A system for reusable research data analyses, EPJ Web Conf

    E. Bocchi, D. Castro, H. Gonzalez, M. Lamanna, P. Mato, J. Moscicki, D. Piparo and E. Tejedor, Facilitating collaborative analysis in swan, EPJ Web Conf. 214, 07022 (2019), doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921407022

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921407022 2019

  26. [27]

    Giordano et al., HEPScore: A new CPU benchmark for the WLCG , EPJ Web of Conf

    Gazzarrini, Elena , Garcia Garcia, Enrique , Gosein, Domenic and Espinal, Xavier , The virtual research environment: A multi-science analysis platform, EPJ Web of Conf. 295, 08023 (2024), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429508023

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429508023 2024

  27. [28]

    The ATLAS Open Data team , atlasopenmagic, https://github.com/atlas-outreach-data-tools/atlasopenmagic (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Using the open event generation data, https://opendata.atlas.cern/docs/tutresearch/openevgentut (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema \^ tre, A. Mertens and M. Selvaggi, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , JHEP 02, 057 (2014), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)057, 1307.6346

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1007/jhep02(2014)057 2014

  30. [31]

    CMS Collaboration , CMS Open Data Guide , https://cms-opendata-guide.web.cern.ch (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [32]

    CMS Simulated Dataset Names , https://opendata.cern.ch/docs/cms-simulated-dataset-names (2026)

    work page 2026

  32. [33]

    CMS Collaboration , Simulated dataset TTToSemiLeptonic\_TuneCP5\_13TeV-powheg-pythia8 in NANOAODSIM format for 2016 collision data , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.4J3Y.1CME, The link under Dataset Semantics directs to the variable listing. (2024)

    work page doi:10.7483/opendata.cms.4j3y.1cme 2016

  33. [34]

    o nnblad and T. Sj \

    C. Bierlich, L. L \"o nnblad and T. Sj \"o strand, The PYTHIA Facility (2026), 2603.01744

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [35]

    Bellis, J

    M. Bellis, J. Hogan, K. Lassila-Perini, T. McCauley and S. Sekmen, CMS Open Data Workshop 2024 , https://cms-opendata-workshop.github.io/2024-07-29-CERN/ (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    Dainese, M

    A. Dainese, M. Mangano, A. B. Meyer, A. Nisati, G. Salam and M. A. Vesterinen, Report on the Physics at the HL-LHC, and Perspectives for the HE-LHC , Tech. Rep. CERN-2019-007 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2703572, Geneva, Switzerland, doi:10.23731/CYRM-2019-007 (2019)

    work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2019-007 2019

  36. [37]

    The ATLAS and CMS Collaborations , Snowmass White Paper Contribution: Physics with the Phase-2 ATLAS and CMS Detectors , Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-018 https://inspirehep.net/literature/2071542, CMS-PAS-FTR-22-001 https://inspirehep.net/literature/2071528, CERN, Geneva (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [38]

    Drees, H

    M. Drees, H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall and J. S. Kim, CheckMATE: Confronting your Favourite New Physics Model with LHC Data , Comput. Phys. Commun. 187, 227 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.018, 1312.2591

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.018 2015

  38. [39]

    Dercks, N

    D. Dercks, N. Desai, J. S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, J. Tattersall and T. Weber, CheckMATE 2: From the model to the limit , Comput. Phys. Commun. 221, 383 (2017), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.08.021, 1611.09856

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.08.021 2017

  39. [40]

    Conte, B

    E. Conte, B. Fuks and G. Serret, MadAnalysis 5, A User-Friendly Framework for Collider Phenomenology , Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.009, 1206.1599

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.009 2013

  40. [41]

    Conte and B

    E. Conte and B. Fuks, Confronting new physics theories to LHC data with MADANALYSIS 5 , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33(28), 1830027 (2018), doi:10.1142/S0217751X18300272, 1808.00480

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x18300272 2018

  41. [42]

    Bierlich, A

    C. Bierlich, A. Buckley, J. M. Butterworth, C. Gutschow, L. Lonnblad, T. Procter, P. Richardson and Y. Yeh, Robust independent validation of experiment and theory: Rivet version 4 release note , SciPost Phys. Codeb. 36, 1 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.36, 2404.15984

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.36 2024

  42. [43]

    Buckley, J

    A. Buckley, J. Butterworth, D. Grellscheid, H. Hoeth, L. Lonnblad, J. Monk, H. Schulz and F. Siegert, Rivet user manual , Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 2803 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.021, 1003.0694

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.021 2013

  43. [44]

    2, 2025 )

    LHC MC WG , LHC Monte Carlo WG subgroup meeting – data sharing and new workflows , https://indico.cern.ch/event/1568443/ ( Oct. 2, 2025 )

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Improved Common t t Monte-Carlo Settings for ATLAS and CMS , Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-016 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2862524 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [46]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method , JHEP 11, 070 (2007), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, 0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  46. [47]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX , JHEP 06, 043 (2010), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, 1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  47. [48]

    Buckley et al., Testing new physics models with global comparisons to collider measurements: the Contur toolkit , SciPost Phys

    A. Buckley et al., Testing new physics models with global comparisons to collider measurements: the Contur toolkit , SciPost Phys. Core 4, 013 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.4.2.013, 2102.04377

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.4.2.013 2021

  48. [49]

    J. M. Butterworth, D. Grellscheid, M. Kr \"a mer, B. Sarrazin and D. Yallup, Constraining new physics with collider measurements of Standard Model signatures , JHEP 03, 078 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)078, 1606.05296

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2017)078 2017

  49. [50]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of the differential Drell-Yan cross section in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV , JHEP 12, 059 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)059, 1812.10529

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)059 2019

  50. [51]

    Erdogan and J

    E. Erdogan and J. Butterworth, Hepmc access repository, https://gitlab.cern.ch/mcnet/hepmc-access

    work page

  51. [52]

    HTCondor , Htcondor documentation, https://htcondor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

    work page

  52. [53]

    YODA Collaboration , Yoda: Yet more objects for data analysis, https://yoda.hepforge.org/

    work page

  53. [54]

    utschow, S. Prestel, M. Sch\

    E. Bothmann, A. Buckley, C. G\"utschow, S. Prestel, M. Sch\"onherr et al., A standard convention for particle-level monte carlo event-variation weights, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 007 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.1.007, 2203.08230

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.6.1.007 2023

  54. [55]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Generator event weights, https://opendata.atlas.cern/docs/data/for_research/evgen_weights (2026)

    work page 2026

  55. [56]

    J. Y. Araz, A. Buckley, B. Fuks, H. Reyes-Gonzalez, W. Waltenberger, S. L. Williamson and J. Yellen, Strength in numbers: Optimal and scalable combination of LHC new-physics searches , SciPost Phys. 14(4), 077 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.077, 2209.00025

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.14.4.077 2023

  56. [57]

    Yellen, Selection techniques for optimal meta-analysis of beyond standard model physics , Ph.D

    J. Yellen, Selection techniques for optimal meta-analysis of beyond standard model physics , Ph.D. thesis, Glasgow U., doi:10.5525/gla.thesis.85009 (2025)

    work page doi:10.5525/gla.thesis.85009 2025

  57. [58]

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of top-quark pair differential cross-sections in the lepton+jets channel in pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , JHEP 11, 191 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)191, 1708.00727

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)191 2017

  58. [59]

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of differential cross sections of top quark pair production in association with jets in pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10, 159 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)159, 1802.06572

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)159 2018

  59. [60]

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of t t production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 04, 046 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)046, 1811.12113

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2019)046 2019

  60. [61]

    Aad et al., Measurements of top-quark pair differential and double-differential cross-sections in the +jets channel with pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Eur

    G. Aad et al., Measurements of top-quark pair differential and double-differential cross-sections in the +jets channel with pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Eur. Phys. J. C 79(12), 1028 (2019), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7525-6, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80, 1092 (2020)], 1908.07305

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7525-6 2019

  61. [62]

    Aaboud et al., Measurement of the cross section for isolated-photon plus jet production in pp collisions at s=13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Phys

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurement of the cross section for isolated-photon plus jet production in pp collisions at s=13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 780, 578 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.035, 1801.00112

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.035 2018

  62. [63]

    G. Aad et al., Measurement of isolated-photon plus two-jet production in pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 03, 179 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)179, 1912.09866

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)179 2020

  63. [64]

    Aaboud et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of t t production in leptonic final states at s =13 TeV in ATLAS , Eur

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of t t production in leptonic final states at s =13 TeV in ATLAS , Eur. Phys. J. C 79(5), 382 (2019), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6849-6, 1812.01697

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6849-6 2019

  64. [65]

    G. Aad et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of t t production in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10, 191 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)191, 2403.09452

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)191 2024

  65. [66]

    M. Aaboud et al., Searches for scalar leptoquarks and differential cross-section measurements in dilepton-dijet events in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment , Eur. Phys. J. C 79(9), 733 (2019), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7181-x, 1902.00377

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7181-x 2019

  66. [67]

    G. Aad et al., Measurement of the t t production cross-section and lepton differential distributions in e dilepton events from pp collisions at s =13\, TeV with the ATLAS detector , Eur. Phys. J. C 80(6), 528 (2020), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7907-9, 1910.08819

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7907-9 2020

  67. [68]

    G. Aad et al., Measurements of W^+W^-+ 1 jet production cross-sections in pp collisions at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 06, 003 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)003, 2103.10319

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)003 2021

  68. [69]

    G. Aad et al., Inclusive and differential cross-sections for dilepton t t production measured in s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 07, 141 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)141, 2303.15340

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)141 2023

  69. [70]

    Chen et al., in preparation

    S. Chen et al., in preparation

    work page

  70. [71]

    Alwall, M

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond , JHEP 06, 128 (2011), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)128, 1106.0522

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2011)128 2011

  71. [72]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , JHEP 07, 079 (2014), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, 1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  72. [73]

    G. Aad et al., Tools for estimating fake/non-prompt lepton backgrounds with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Journal of Instrumentation 18(11), T11004 (2023), doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/T11004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/t11004 2023

  73. [74]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Search for top-squark pair production in final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using \(36\, fb ^ -1 \) of \( s = 13\, TeV \) \(pp\) collision data with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 06, 108 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)108, HEPData entry https://www.hepdata.net/record/resource/406718?landing_page=true, 1711.11520

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)108 2018

  74. [76]

    Buckley, L

    A. Buckley, L. Corpe, M. Habedank and T. Procter, Enabling stable preservation of ML algorithms in high-energy physics with petrifyML (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.11830, 2509.11830

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.11830 2025

  75. [77]

    Baro n , M

    P. Baro n , M. H. Seymour and A. Si \'o dmok, Novel approach to measure quark/gluon jets at the LHC , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(1), 28 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12363-4, 2307.15378

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12363-4 2024

  76. [78]

    Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual , Eur

    M. Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual , Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 639 (2008), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9, 0803.0883

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9 2008

  77. [79]

    Bellm et al., Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note , Eur

    J. Bellm et al., Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note , Eur. Phys. J. C 76(4), 196 (2016), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8, 1512.01178

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8 2016

  78. [80]

    Bewick et al., Herwig 7.3 release note , Eur

    G. Bewick et al., Herwig 7.3 release note , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(10), 1053 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13211-9, 2312.05175

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13211-9 2024

  79. [81]

    Bellm, et al., arXiv:2512.16645 (2025)

    J. Bellm et al., The Physics of Herwig 7 (2025), 2512.16645

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [82]

    CMS Collaboration , Jet primary dataset in AOD format from RunB of 2011 (/Jet/Run2011B-12Oct2013-v1/AOD) , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.5JYA.HKSG (2022)

    work page doi:10.7483/opendata.cms.5jya.hksg 2011

Showing first 80 references.