pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12470 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ⚛️ physics.geo-ph · physics.flu-dyn

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Effects of global core-mantle boundary topography on outer-core convection and topographic torques

Eric G. Blackman, John A. Tarduno, Michael A. Calkins, Tobias G. Oliver

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.geo-ph physics.flu-dyn
keywords core-mantle boundary topographyouter core convectiongeostrophic contourstopographic torqueslength of day variationsrotating shell convectiondecadal LOD
0
0 comments X

The pith

Core-mantle boundary topography triggers convection below the usual onset threshold and generates torques large enough to explain observed decadal length-of-day variations when scaled to Earth conditions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses numerical simulations of rotating fluid in a spherical shell to show that bumps and dents on the core-mantle boundary change how the outer core flows. Deformed lines of constant axial height let buoyancy steadily push the time-averaged flow, raising flow speeds and heat transport by up to 100 percent even when the temperature difference is below the value needed for convection with a smooth boundary. The authors derive and confirm a scaling for the torques that these interactions produce and demonstrate that the extrapolated values sit in the same range as those required to account for the measured decade-scale and shorter fluctuations in Earth's rotation rate.

Core claim

Finite-amplitude topography at the core-mantle boundary induces a new instability below the critical Rayleigh number for a spherical shell; the instability is sustained by deformed geostrophic contours that permit buoyancy to perform net work on the mean flow, increasing Reynolds and Nusselt numbers by up to 100 percent. Topographic torques scale linearly with topographic amplitude and quadratically with flow velocity; a new global estimate for spectrally broad topography, when extrapolated to core parameters, yields torques whose magnitude matches that needed to drive observed decadal and subdecadal ΔLOD variations.

What carries the argument

Deformed geostrophic contours (lines of constant axial height) that allow buoyancy to do sustained work on the time-averaged flow and produce topographic torques.

If this is right

  • Reynolds and Nusselt numbers rise by up to 100 percent relative to a spherical boundary once contours are deformed.
  • Topographic torques increase linearly with topographic height and quadratically with flow speed for both simple and spectrally broad shapes.
  • The resulting torques, once extrapolated, fall within the range needed to drive measured decadal and subdecadal changes in length of day.
  • The same topography couples the core to the mantle and can therefore influence both rotation rate and the geomagnetic field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The contour-deformation route to convection may operate in other rapidly rotating planets or moons whose boundaries are not perfectly spherical.
  • Seismically mapped deep-mantle heterogeneities could be used to forecast specific patterns of torque and flow adjustment inside the core.
  • If the torque scaling survives more extreme parameters, then mantle convection models that include CMB topography would need to incorporate this additional core-mantle coupling term.

Load-bearing premise

The identified instability, contour-deformation mechanism, and torque scalings remain valid when the simulated parameters are pushed to the extreme Rayleigh, Ekman, and Prandtl numbers of Earth's core.

What would settle it

A simulation at Ekman numbers at least an order of magnitude smaller than those used here that produces time-averaged torques more than a factor of ten below the extrapolated values required for observed ΔLOD would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12470 by Eric G. Blackman, John A. Tarduno, Michael A. Calkins, Tobias G. Oliver.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visualizations of the topography used in the simulations: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectral decomposition of the tomographic shape function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Geostrophic contours for (left to right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Both panels) Linear stability diagram for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualizations of the subcritical flow for h8,4 at RaEk = 10, Ek = 10−6 , and ϵ = 0.05. (a) Axial velocity w in the meridional plane. (b) Temperature ϑ in the equatorial plane. Although difficult to see, the isotherms are slightly misaligned with the geostrophic contours. The misalignment facilitates buoyancy work on the flow. The homogeneous boundary condition ϑ (rcmb) = 0 is used. on rcmb. 3.1.3 Saturate… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Saturated flow speeds for the subcritical parameters. The open markers denote simulations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time averaged azimuthal velocity (uϕ) in the equatorial plane. All simulations were performed at Raf = 40, Ek = 10−6 . (a) The control case with no topography (ϵ = 0). The topographic amplitude for (b)-(f) is ϵ = 0.1. (b) h2,1 (c) h8,4 (d) h32,16 (e) h32,17 (f) ht. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Instantaneous visualizations for temperature field fluctuations in the (a) equatorial and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Global transport quantities: (a) Reynolds and (b) Nusselt numbers plotted against topographic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Reynolds numbers for all supercritical/turbulent simulations. Symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: One dimensional kinetic energy spectra for control ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Time dependence of topographic torque for (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Standard deviation of the reduced torque for all cases. (b) Standard deviation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Rescaled magnitudes of the cosine (C) and sine (S) components for the indicated spherical harmonic of the pressure on the outer boundary for the (a) h8,4 and (b) h32,16 cases. phase shift with respect to the topography is necessary. Figures 14(a) and 14(b) show the power in the spherical harmonic component of the pressure that is relevant to the fluctuating torques for the h8,4 and h32,16, respectively. W… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Power spectra of the fluctuating pressure. (a) Spectra for all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Standard deviation of the topographic torque for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topography at the core-mantle boundary (CMB) couples the outer core to the mantle and likely generates observable variations in the length of day ($\Delta$LOD) and the geomagnetic field, though these effects remain poorly understood. We use direct numerical simulations of rotating shell convection with finite-amplitude CMB topography to investigate dynamical effects on the outer core. A range of topographic shapes is used, including individual spherical harmonics and a model representing seismically inferred heterogeneities in the deep mantle. As predicted by prior linear theory in the rotating annulus model, a new instability arises for Rayleigh numbers below the onset of convection; we confirm its existence in a global geometry, though the predicted scalings are quantitatively modified. The shape of the geostrophic contours -- lines of constant axial height -- plays a central role: deformed contours allow buoyancy to do work on the time-averaged flow, driving increases in Reynolds and Nusselt numbers of up to $\sim$100\% relative to a spherical boundary. Previous work showed that topographic torques scale linearly with topographic amplitude and quadratically with flow speeds; we confirm this scaling and extend it with new theory that estimates the torques for global, spectrally broad topography. When extrapolated to core conditions, the predicted torques are consistent with the magnitude required to drive observed decadal and subdecadal $\Delta$LOD variations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses direct numerical simulations of rotating spherical-shell convection with finite-amplitude CMB topography (both single spherical harmonics and a seismically motivated model) to examine subcritical instabilities, modifications to convective vigor via deformed geostrophic contours, and topographic torques. It confirms the existence of a contour-deformation instability below the onset of convection, reports up to ~100% increases in Reynolds and Nusselt numbers, verifies the linear-in-amplitude and quadratic-in-velocity torque scaling, supplies new theory for spectrally broad topography, and extrapolates the resulting torques to core conditions to argue consistency with the magnitude required for observed decadal and subdecadal ΔLOD variations.

Significance. If the extrapolation holds, the work supplies a concrete, numerically supported mechanism by which CMB topography can drive observable LOD variations and potentially influence the geomagnetic field. The DNS confirmation of the instability in global geometry and the extension of torque theory to broad spectra are clear strengths; the paper also supplies reproducible parameter choices and direct comparisons to prior annulus results.

major comments (2)
  1. [core-extrapolation discussion] The central claim that extrapolated torques are consistent with observed ΔLOD magnitudes rests on the untested assumption that the identified contour-deformation instability and quadratic torque scaling remain dominant at core Ekman numbers (~10^{-15}), Rayleigh numbers, and Prandtl numbers. No asymptotic analysis, resolution studies at lower E, or demonstration that inertial/viscous corrections stay negligible is provided to support this extrapolation (see the final paragraph of the abstract and the discussion of core extrapolation).
  2. [torque-theory section] The new theory for torques generated by spectrally broad topography is introduced without a clear statement of its range of validity or quantitative error estimates when applied to the seismic model; this directly affects the reliability of the LOD-magnitude comparison.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states that 'predicted scalings are quantitatively modified' but does not specify the nature or magnitude of those modifications relative to the annulus model.
  2. [figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly list the Ekman, Rayleigh, and Prandtl numbers used in each panel to facilitate direct comparison with the core regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and outline targeted revisions that will strengthen the manuscript without altering its core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [core-extrapolation discussion] The central claim that extrapolated torques are consistent with observed ΔLOD magnitudes rests on the untested assumption that the identified contour-deformation instability and quadratic torque scaling remain dominant at core Ekman numbers (~10^{-15}), Rayleigh numbers, and Prandtl numbers. No asymptotic analysis, resolution studies at lower E, or demonstration that inertial/viscous corrections stay negligible is provided to support this extrapolation (see the final paragraph of the abstract and the discussion of core extrapolation).

    Authors: We agree that the extrapolation rests on the assumption that the contour-deformation mechanism and quadratic torque scaling identified in our DNS remain dominant at core parameters. Our simulations confirm these features across a range of accessible Ekman numbers and Rayleigh numbers, and the quadratic scaling follows directly from the torque theory we extend. However, we do not provide new asymptotic analysis or lower-E resolution studies, as these lie outside the scope of the present work. In the revised manuscript we will expand the core-extrapolation discussion to (i) restate the assumptions explicitly, (ii) reference existing asymptotic results on rotating convection that support the persistence of geostrophic balance and quadratic drag at low E, and (iii) qualify the ΔLOD comparison as order-of-magnitude consistency rather than a precise prediction. These additions will make the limitations transparent while preserving the value of the global-geometry confirmation and new theory. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [torque-theory section] The new theory for torques generated by spectrally broad topography is introduced without a clear statement of its range of validity or quantitative error estimates when applied to the seismic model; this directly affects the reliability of the LOD-magnitude comparison.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The new theory for spectrally broad topography assumes linear superposition of single-harmonic contributions under the condition that topographic amplitudes remain small enough for the quadratic velocity scaling to hold and for mode interactions to be weak. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short subsection (or expanded paragraph) in the torque-theory section that (i) states the validity range in terms of topographic amplitude and flow regime, (ii) quantifies the approximation error by direct comparison of the broad-spectrum prediction against our single-harmonic DNS results, and (iii) reports the residual error when the theory is applied to the seismic model. These additions will directly improve the reliability assessment of the LOD-magnitude comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations and extrapolations are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper conducts direct numerical simulations to confirm the existence of a contour-deformation instability (previously predicted in annulus geometry) and to verify/extend torque scalings (linear in topographic amplitude, quadratic in flow speed) with new theory for spectrally broad global topography. These steps produce independent outputs from the simulations rather than tautological reductions. The final claim compares extrapolated torque magnitudes to the order-of-magnitude requirement for observed ΔLOD variations; this is a consistency check, not a fit or self-definition. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to prior inputs, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Claims rest on standard Boussinesq rotating convection equations, the validity of geostrophic contour analysis, and extrapolation of torque scalings to unsimulated core parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • topographic amplitude
    Finite amplitudes are varied across simulations to quantify effects on flow and torques.
  • Rayleigh number range
    Values below and above the spherical onset are chosen to isolate the new instability.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Outer-core fluid obeys the Boussinesq approximation in a rotating spherical shell.
    Standard modeling assumption invoked for all simulations.
  • domain assumption Deformed geostrophic contours allow net work by buoyancy on the time-averaged flow.
    Central to the explanation of increased Re and Nu.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1392 out tokens · 72104 ms · 2026-05-13T02:04:23.298110+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., & Braginsky, S

    Anufriev, A. P., & Braginsky, S. I. (1977). Influence of irregularities of the boundary of the Earth’s core on the velocity of the liquid and on the magnetic field, II.Geomagnetism & Aeronomy, 17, 78–82 48

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    Aubert, J. (2023). State and evolution of the geodynamo from numerical models reaching the physical conditions of Earth’s core.Geophysical Journal International, 235(1), 468–487

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    M., Horn, S., & Julien, K

    Aurnou, J. M., Horn, S., & Julien, K. (2020). Connections between nonrotating, slowly rotating, and rapidly rotating turbulent convection transport scalings.Physical Review Research 2, 04315, 1–13

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    A., Calkins, M

    Barik, A., Triana, S. A., Calkins, M. A., Stanley, S., & Aurnou, J. M. (2023). Onset of convection in rotating spherical shells: Variations with radius ratio.Earth Space Sciences, 10(1), e2022EA002606

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    P., & Soward, A

    Bassom, A. P., & Soward, A. M. (1996). Localised rotating convection induced by topography.Physica D, 97, 29–44

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    I., & Soward, A

    Bell, P. I., & Soward, A. M. (1996). The influence of surface topography on rotating convection.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 313, 147–180

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    J., Deems, S., Furlani, T

    Boerner, T. J., Deems, S., Furlani, T. R., Knuth, S. L., & Towns, J. (2023). Access: Advancing innova- tion: Nsf’s advanced cyberinfrastructure coordination ecosystem: Services & support. InPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing, (173–176). ACM, New York, NY, USA

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Braginsky, S. I. (1969). Torsional magnetohydrodynamic vibrations in the Earth’s core and variations in day length.Geomagnetism & Aeronomy (USSR) (Engl. Transl.) (1970), 10, 1–8

    work page 1969

  9. [9]

    Buffett, B. A. (1996). Gravitational oscillations in the length of the day.Geophysical Research Letters, 23(17), 2279–2282

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    A., & Christensen, U

    Buffett, B. A., & Christensen, U. R. (2007). Magnetic and viscous coupling at the core–mantle boundary: inferences from observations of the Earth’s nutations.Geophysical Journal International, 171(1), 145– 152

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Busse, F. H. (1970). Thermal instabilities in rapidly rotating systems.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 44, 441–460

    work page 1970

  12. [12]

    A., Noir, J., Eldredge, J

    Calkins, M. A., Noir, J., Eldredge, J. D., & Aurnou, J. M. (2012). The effects of boundary topography on convection in Earth’s core.Geophysical Journal International, 189, 799–814

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    (1961).Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability

    Chandrasekhar, S. (1961).Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford University Press, U.K

    work page 1961

  14. [14]

    Christensen, U., & Aubert, J. (2006). Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating shells and applications to planetary magnetic fields.Geophysical Journal International, 166, 97–114 49

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Christensen, U. R. (2002). Zonal flow driven by strongly supercritical convection in rotating spherical shells.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 470, 115–133

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Cottaar, S., & Lekic, V. (2016). Morphology of seismically slow lower-mantle structures.Geophysics Supplement Monthly Notifications of the Royal Astronomical Society, 207(2), 1122–1136

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    J., Gubbins, D., Willis, A

    Davies, C. J., Gubbins, D., Willis, A. P., & Jimack, P. K. (2008). Time-averaged paleomagnetic field and secular variation: Predictions from dynamo solutions based on lower mantle seismic tomography. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 169(1), 194–203

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Dehant, V., Puica, M., Folgueira-L´ opez, M., Rekier, J., & Van Hoolst, T. (2025). Analytical computation of the total topographic torque at the core–mantle boundary and its impact on nutations.Geophysical Journal International, 241(1), 474–494

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    O., Marcus, S

    Dickey, J. O., Marcus, S. L., Hide, R., Eubanks, T. M., & Boggs, D. H. (1994). Angular momentum exchange among the solid earth, atmosphere, and oceans: A case study of the 1982–1983 El Ni˜ no event. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99(B12), 23921–23937

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    M., Jones, C

    Dormy, E., Soward, A. M., Jones, C. A., Jault, D., & Cardin, P. (2004). The onset of thermal convection in rotating spherical shells.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 501, 43–70

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    C., Gillet, N., Aubert, J., Livermore, P

    Finlay, C. C., Gillet, N., Aubert, J., Livermore, P. W., & Jault, D. (2023). Gyres, jets and waves in the Earth’s core.Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 4(6), 377–392

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    C., Jackson, A., Gillet, N., & Olsen, N

    Finlay, C. C., Jackson, A., Gillet, N., & Olsen, N. (2012). Core surface magnetic field evolution 2000–2010. Geophysical Journal International, 189(2), 761–781

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Fischer, P., Kerkemeier, S., et al. (2019). Nek5000 version 19.0

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Gastine, T., & Favier, B. (2025). Rotating convection with a melting boundary: An application to the icy moons.Icarus, 429, 116441

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Gastine, T., Wicht, J., & Aubert, J. (2016). Scaling regimes in spherical shell rotating convection.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 808, 690–732

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Gillet, N., Dall’Asta, F., Amblard, P.-O., Claveau, R., & Aubert, J. (2024). Waves in earth’s core and geomagnetic field forecast.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 357, 107284

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Gillet, N., Gerick, F., Jault, D., Schwaiger, T., Aubert, J., & Istas, M. (2022). Satellite magnetic data reveal interannual waves in Earth’s core.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 119(13), e2115258119 50

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Gilman, P. A. (1978). Nonlinear dynamics of Boussinesq convection in a deep rotating spherical shell III: effects of velocity boundary conditions.Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 11, 181–203

    work page 1978

  29. [29]

    Greenspan, H. P. (1968).The Theory of Rotating Fluids. Cambridge University Press, London

    work page 1968

  30. [30]

    Gross, R. S. (2015). 3.09 - earth rotation variations – long period. In G. Schubert (Ed.),Treatise on Geophysics (Second Edition), (215–261). Elsevier, Oxford, second edition edn

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    S., Fukumori, I., Menemenlis, D., & Gegout, P

    Gross, R. S., Fukumori, I., Menemenlis, D., & Gegout, P. (2004). Atmospheric and oceanic excitation of length-of-day variations during 1980–2000.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B1)

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Guervilly, C., Cardin, P., & Schaeffer, N. (2019). Turbulent convective length scale in planetary cores. Nature, 570(7761), 368–371

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Guervilly, C., & Dormy, E. (2025). The cross-over from viscous to inertial lengthscales in rapidly-rotating convection.Geophysical Research Letters, 52(7), e2024GL111593

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    E., Garnero, E

    Hansen, S. E., Garnero, E. J., Li, M., Shim, S.-H., & Rost, S. (2023). Globally distributed subducted materials along the earth’s core-mantle boundary: Implications for ultralow velocity zones.Science Advances, 9(14), eadd4838

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Herrmann, J., & Busse, F. H. (1998). Stationary and time depedent convection in the rotating cylindrical annulus with modulated height.Physics of Fluids, 10(7), 1611–1620

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    Hide, R. (1969). Interaction between the Earth’s liquid core and solid mantle.Nature, 222, 1055–1056

    work page 1969

  37. [37]

    Holme, R., & de Viron, O. (2005). Geomagnetic jerks and a high-resolution length-of-day profile for core studies.Geophysical Journal International, 160, 435–439

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Holme, R., Olsen, N., & Bairstow, F. L. (2011). Mapping geomagnetic secular variation at the core–mantle boundary.Geophysical Journal International, 186(2), 521–528

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Houser, C., Masters, G., Shearer, P., & Laske, G. (2008). Shear and compressional velocity models of the mantle from cluster analysis of long-period waveforms.Geophysical Journal International, 174(1), 195–212

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Jault, D. (2015). Illuminating the electrical conductivity of the lowermost mantle from below.Geophysical Journal International, 202(1), 482–496

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Jault, D. (2020). Tangential stress at the core–mantle interface.Geophysical Journal International, 221(2), 951–967 51

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Jault, D., & Le Mou¨ el, J. L. (1989). The topographic torque associated with a tangentially geostrophic motion at the core surface and inferences on the flow inside the core.Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 48, 273–296

    work page 1989

  43. [43]

    A., Soward, A

    Jones, C. A., Soward, A. M., & Mussa, A. I. (2000). The onset of thermal convection in a rapidly rotating sphere.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 405, 157–179

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    Kaula, W. M. (1966).Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy. Blaisdell Publishing Company Kiani Shahvandi, M., & Soja, B. (2026). Climate-induced length of day variations since the late Pliocene. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 131(3), e2025JB032161

    work page 1966

  45. [45]

    Koelemeijer, P. (2021). Toward consistent seismological models of the core–mantle boundary landscape. In H. Marquardt, M. Ballmer, S. Cottaar, & J. Konter (Eds.),Mantle Convection and Surface Expressions, vol. 263 ofGeophysical Monograph Series, (229–255). American Geophysical Union

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    D., Pyle, M

    Koper, K. D., Pyle, M. L., & Franks, J. M. (2003). Constraints on aspherical core structure from PKiKP-PcP differential travel times.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B3)

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    Kraichnan, R. H. (1967). Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence.Physics of Fluids, 10(7), 1417– 1423

    work page 1967

  48. [48]

    J., & Bloxham, J

    Kuang, W. J., & Bloxham, J. (1993). The effect of boundary topography on motions in the Earth’s core. Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 72, 161–195

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    J., & Chao, B

    Kuang, W. J., & Chao, B. F. (2001). Topographic core-mantle coupling in geodynamo modeling.Geo- physical Research Letters, 28(9), 1871–1874

    work page 2001

  50. [50]

    J., Chao, B

    Kuang, W. J., Chao, B. F., & Chen, J. (2019). Reassessment of electromagnetic core-mantle coupling and its implications to the Earth’s decadal polar motion.Geodesy and Geodynamics, 10(5), 356–362

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Kustowski, B., Ekstr¨ om, G., & Dziewo´ nski, A. M. (2008). Anisotropic shear-wave velocity structure of the earth’s mantle: A global model.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113(B6)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Kvorka, J., & ˇCadek, O. (2022). A numerical model of convective heat transfer in Titan’s subsurface ocean.Icarus, 376(114853)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    M., McNamara, A

    Lassak, T. M., McNamara, A. K., Garnero, E. J., & Zhong, S. (2010). Core-mantle boundary topography as a possible constraint on lower mantle chemistry and dynamics.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 289, 232–241 52

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    M., McNamara, A

    Lassak, T. M., McNamara, A. K., & Zhong, S. (2007). Influence of thermochemical piles on topography at Earth’s core-mantle boundary.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 261, 443–455

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Lekic, V., Cottaar, S., Dziewonski, A., & Romanowicz, B. (2012). Cluster analysis of global lower mantle tomography: A new class of structure and implications for chemical heterogeneity.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 357-358, 68–77

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Lin, Y., Marti, P., & Jackson, A. (2025). Invariance of dynamo action in an early-Earth model.Nature, 644, 109–114

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    W., Hollerbach, R., & Finlay, C

    Livermore, P. W., Hollerbach, R., & Finlay, C. C. (2017). An accelerating high-latitude jet in Earth’s core.Nature Geosciences, 10, 62–68

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    D., & Holme, R

    Madsen, F. D., & Holme, R. (2025). A recent interruption in the 6-year oscillation in length-of-day. Geophysical Journal International, 243(2), ggaf337

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    J., Julien, K., & Calkins, M

    Maffei, S., Krouss, M. J., Julien, K., & Calkins, M. A. (2021). On the inverse cascade and flow speed scaling behaviour in rapidly rotating Rayleigh–B´ enard convection.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 913, A18

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Monville, R., C´ ebron, D., & Jault, D. (2025). Topographic drag at the core-mantle interface.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 130(4), e2024JB029770

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    E., & Buffett, B

    Mound, J. E., & Buffett, B. A. (2003). Interannual oscillations in length of day: Implications for the structure of the mantle and core.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B7)

    work page 2003

  62. [62]

    E., & Davies, C

    Mound, J. E., & Davies, C. J. (2023). Longitudinal structure of the Earth’s magnetic field controlled by lower mantle heat flow.Nature Geosciences, 16, 380–385 M´ egnin, C., & Romanowicz, B. (2000). The three-dimensional shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher-mode waveforms.Geophysical Journal International, ...

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    A., O’Connor, A

    Nicoski, J. A., O’Connor, A. R., & Calkins, M. A. (2024). Asymptotic scaling relations for rotating spherical convection with strong zonal flows.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 981, A22

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    G., Blackman, E

    Oliver, T. G., Blackman, E. G., Tarduno, J. A., & Calkins, M. A. (2025). Turbulence in Earth’s core generates large topographic torques on the mantle.Communications Earth and Environment, 6, 484

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    G., Jacobi, A., Julien, K., & Calkins, M

    Oliver, T. G., Jacobi, A., Julien, K., & Calkins, M. A. (2023). Small scale quasigeostrophic convective turbulence at large Rayleigh number.Physical Review Fluids, 8, 093502 53

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    O., Coe, R

    Olson, P. O., Coe, R. S., Driscoll, P. E., Glatzmaier, G. A., & Roberts, P. H. (2010). Geodynamo reversal frequency and heterogeneous core-mantle boundary heat flow.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 180, 66–79

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    Parker, E. N. (1955). Hydromagnetic dynamo models.The Astrophysical Journal, 122, 293–314

    work page 1955

  68. [68]

    Patera, T. (1984). A spectral element method for fluid dynamics: laminar flow in a channel expansion. Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 468–488

    work page 1984

  69. [69]

    Pope, S. B. (2000).Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    work page 2000

  70. [70]

    Puica, M., Dehant, V., Folgueira-L´ opez, M., van Hoolst, T., & Rekier, J. (2023). Analytical computation of total topographic torque at the core–mantle boundary and its impact on tidally driven length-of-day variations.Geophysical Journal International, 234(1), 585–596

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    J., & Woodhouse, J

    Ritsema, J., Deuss, A., van Heijst, H. J., & Woodhouse, J. H. (2011). S40RTS: a degree-40 shear-velocity model for the mantle from new Rayleigh wave dispersion, teleseismic traveltime and normal-mode splitting function measurements.Geophysical Journal International, 184(3), 1223–1236

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    Roberts, P. H. (1968). On the thermal instability of a rotating-fluid sphere containing heat sources. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 263, 93–117

    work page 1968

  73. [73]

    H., & Aurnou, J

    Roberts, P. H., & Aurnou, J. M. (2012). On the theory of core-mantle coupling.Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 106(2), 157–230

    work page 2012

  74. [74]

    Rosat, S., & Gillet, N. (2023). Intradecadal variations in length of day: Coherence with models of the Earth’s core dynamics.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 341, 107053

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    J., & Williams, Q

    Rost, S., Garnero, E. J., & Williams, Q. (2006). Fine-scale ultralow-velocity zone structure from high- frequency seismic array data.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B9)

    work page 2006

  76. [76]

    Schaeffer, N., Jault, D., Nataf, H.-C., & Fournier, A. (2017). Turbulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards earth’s core.Geophysical Journal International, 211(1), 1–29

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    A., Forte, A

    Simmons, N. A., Forte, A. M., Boschi, L., & Grand, S. P. (2010). Gypsum: A joint tomographic model of mantle density and seismic wave speeds.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 115(B12)

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    T., Ghattas, O., & Dhabaleswar, K

    Stanzione, D., West, J., Evans, R. T., Ghattas, O., & Dhabaleswar, K. P. (2020). Frontera: The evolution of leadership computing at the national science foundation.Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (PEARC ’20) 54 ϵ0.01 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.2 h2,1 29.74 29.74 29.74 29.74 29.75 h8,4 29.74 29.74 29.74 29.74 29.75 h32,16 29.74 29.74 29.74 29....

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Tanaka, S. (2010). Constraints on the core-mantle boundary topography from P4KP-PcP differential travel times.Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, B04310

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    A., Watkeys, M

    Tarduno, J. A., Watkeys, M. K., Huffman, T. N., Cottrell, R. D., Blackman, E. G., Wendt, A., et al. (2015). Antiquity of the South Atlantic Anomaly and evidence for top-down control on the geodynamo. Nature Communications, 6(1), 7865

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.