pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12603 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

The flare and spiral structure of the Milky Way's disc as traced by young giant stars

E. Poggio , R. Drimmel , S. Khanna , R. Andrae , M. G. Lattanzi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords young giant starsMilky Way discgalactic flarespiral armsPerseus armLocal armgalactic warp
0
0 comments X

The pith

Young giant stars map the Milky Way's flaring disc and extend spiral arm segments by 2-4 kpc.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the three-dimensional structure of roughly 16,000 young giant stars out to 8 kpc, showing they trace a thin disc whose vertical scale height increases outward. It demonstrates that these stars follow coherent spiral arm segments that extend earlier maps based on upper main sequence and OB stars. The analysis corrects for survey selection effects and vertical shifts from the Galactic warp and corrugations to avoid biasing the measured scale heights. If correct, the work establishes that the Perseus Arm has a pitch angle near 20 degrees and that the Local/Orion arm is a gently curving structure at least 10 kpc long.

Core claim

Young giant stars trace a thin disc with local scale height 77 pc that flares outward with radial scale length 3.5 kpc; in the plane they delineate coherent spiral arm segments that extend previous maps by 2-4 kpc, support a roughly 20-degree pitch for the Perseus Arm, reveal the Local/Orion arm as an extended 10 kpc structure with gentle curvature, and identify a new segment associated with the Scutum Arm detached from the Sagittarius-Carina Arm.

What carries the argument

Young giant stars as tracers, after correction for survey selection function and vertical displacements from the Galactic warp and corrugations.

If this is right

  • The disc scale height grows exponentially outward, producing a thicker outer disc.
  • Spiral arms remain coherent over distances several kiloparsecs longer than previously traced.
  • The Perseus Arm follows a constant pitch angle of roughly 20 degrees across the mapped region.
  • The Local/Orion arm forms a single extended, gently curving feature rather than a short straight segment.
  • A distinct inner-Galaxy feature appears associated with the Scutum Arm and separated from the Sagittarius-Carina Arm.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Updated arm geometries can be used to test dynamical models of spiral structure maintenance.
  • The measured flare length scale supplies a new constraint on outer-disc heating mechanisms.
  • The extended Local arm length suggests it may connect to outer-arm features seen in other tracers.
  • Similar mapping with future deeper surveys could test whether the flare continues beyond 8 kpc.

Load-bearing premise

The survey selection function and the vertical displacements from the Galactic warp and corrugations can be accurately modeled and subtracted.

What would settle it

New distance and position data for young giants that show no radial increase in disc thickness or that break the reported spiral arm segments into disconnected pieces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12603 by E. Poggio, M. G. Lattanzi, R. Andrae, R. Drimmel, S. Khanna.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Histogram of the apparent magnitude G for the sample selected in this work (blue) and the young giant catalog from Paper I (orange). four different panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Edge-on view of the Galactic disc at different azimuthal slices. The Sun’s position is at Galactic azimuth ϕ = 0 ◦ and ϕ > 0 ◦ in the direction of Galactic rotation. The thick dashed line shows the median vertical distribution at a given Galactocentric radius R within ±1 kpc, while the thin dotted lines show the 84th and 16th percentiles of the vertical distribution. The inhomogeneous clumps in the density… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of fitted vertical distributions in individual cells. Each panel corresponds to a different cell in the XY-plane. For a given cell, the black points show the observed star counts along the vertical coordinate Z ′ = Z − Zmed, where Zmed is the median Z of the stars in that cell. The red dashed line shows the best-fit model obtained in this work. For illustrative purposes only, the grey dashed line … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: histogram of the number of stars per cell. Middle panel: distribution of the cells in the XY-plane, color coded by the number of stars per cell. The Sun’s position is in (X,Y)=(0, 0), and the Galactic center is to the right, in (X,Y)=(R⊙,0), with R⊙ = 8.277 kpc ( GRAVITY Collaboration et al. 2022). Right panel: same as the middle panel, but now color-coded by the inferred hZ in each cell [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Obtained disc scale heights at different Galactocentric radii R. Each point corresponds to a cell in the middle and right panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Vertical thickness of the Galactic disc using overlapping cells in XY. The Sun’s position is shown by the black cross. Dashed curves represent the constant distance to the Galactic centre at R = 14 kpc, 12 kpc, and 10 kpc, respectively, from left to right. of objects), and therefore have a very low constraining power in the fit of the flare. Indeed, the final obtained values of hZ0 and hf l remain identica… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left panel: The distribution of the young giant sample in the XY plane. Each black point corresponds to a star. The Sun’s position is shown by the ⊙ symbol. The Galactic Center (GC) is to the right, at (X,Y)=(R⊙, 0 kpc), with R⊙ = 8.277 kpc ( GRAVITY Collaboration et al. 2022). Galactic rotation is clockwise. Right panel: Same as left panel, but now showing the regions of positive (>0) overdensities in the… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Three-dimensional view of the overdense regions as mapped with the young giant sample (see text for more details). The two panels show two different examples of viewing angles. The corresponding interactive three-dimensional plot will be made available. (An interactive plot is available to examine the map at differ￾ent viewing angles and with zoom-in/out options.) As ex￾pected, the map shown in [PITH_FULL… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the spiral structure mapped in this work and other works available in literature (R. Drimmel et al. 2025; M. J. Reid et al. 2019; L. G. Hou & J. L. Han 2014; E. S. Levine et al. 2006b; J. H. Taylor & J. M. Cordes 1993; J. P. Vallee 1995), as indicated by the title of each panel. Models are plotted using the Python library SpiralMap (A. K. Prusty & S. Khanna 2025). nearest segment of the… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between the flare parametrization obtained in this work (black line/grey shaded area) and other models avail￾able in literature for different tracers. as a solid black curve characterised by hz0 ∼77 pc and a flare scale-length of hf l ∼3.5 kpc. This can be compared with the blue dash-dotted curve, which is the flare profile of OB stars from Gaia DR2 obtained by C. Li et al. (2019). Since our sa… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left panel: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Same as the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison between the map obtained in this work (colored contours), the distribution of YSOs from M. A. Kuhn et al. (2021a) in grey (with the cyan sources identified as discussed in the text), and masers from M. J. Reid et al. (2019). et al. 2021b), and highlight them in cyan in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the three-dimensional structure of a sample of $\sim$ 16000 young giant stars in the Galactic disc out to $\sim$8 kpc in heliocentric distance. This population traces a thin disc with a local vertical scale height of $h_{Z \odot} = 77 \pm 4$ pc, that progressively thickens toward the outer Galaxy with a prominent Galactic flare, rising exponentially with a radial scale length of $h_{fl} = 3.5 \pm 0.3 \, \rm{kpc}$. Our analysis incorporates both the survey selection function and the vertical displacements caused by the Galactic warp and corrugations, which, if neglected, would lead to significant biases in the derived disc scale height. In the Galactic plane, the young giants trace coherent spiral arm segments, extending previous maps based on upper main sequence (UMS) and OB stars by 2-4 kpc depending on the considered direction. The obtained map supports a pitch angle of roughly 20 degrees for the Perseus Arm, and shows that the Local/Orion arm stretches at least 10 kpc in length. Unlike earlier and more local maps based on UMS and OB stars, where the relatively small sampled portion of the Perseus Arm appeared as a short, nearly straight feature, our map reveals it as an extended structure with a gentle curvature, as expected for spiral arms on large scales. In the inner Galaxy, we also identify a new segment likely associated with the Scutum Arm, clearly detached from the Sagittarius-Carina Arm in the fourth Galactic quadrant.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes a sample of ~16000 young giant stars in the Galactic disc out to ~8 kpc heliocentric distance. It reports a thin disc with local vertical scale height h_{Z⊙} = 77 ± 4 pc that flares outward with radial scale length h_fl = 3.5 ± 0.3 kpc. After applying survey selection function and corrections for vertical displacements due to the Galactic warp and corrugations, the stars are shown to trace coherent spiral arm segments that extend prior UMS/OB-star maps by 2-4 kpc, supporting a ~20° pitch angle for the Perseus Arm, a Local/Orion arm at least 10 kpc long with gentle curvature, and a new segment likely associated with the Scutum Arm.

Significance. If the corrections hold, the work provides a valuable extension of Milky Way spiral structure maps to larger radii using a distinct tracer population, yielding quantitative flare parameters and geometric constraints (e.g., Perseus pitch and Local arm length) that can be compared against dynamical models. The direct use of observed positions after stated corrections avoids obvious circularity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims of coherent spiral arm segments extending 2-4 kpc and the specific geometries (20° Perseus pitch, 10 kpc Local arm) depend on accurate subtraction of warp/corrugation vertical displacements to recover in-plane (x,y) locations. No quantitative validation, residual error budget, or test of how subtraction residuals affect arm coherence at large radii is described, which is load-bearing for the extension and curvature results.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the fitted values h_{Z⊙} and h_fl are reported with uncertainties, yet no details are given on the fitting procedure, data cuts, or how selection function and warp models were jointly applied, preventing assessment of whether the reported uncertainties fully capture systematic effects.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the notation h_{Z ⊙} and h_fl is clear but could be defined explicitly on first use for readers unfamiliar with Galactic disc conventions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and positive evaluation of the significance of our study. We have carefully considered the major comments and revised the manuscript to include quantitative validation of the warp corrections and expanded details on the fitting procedure for the disc parameters.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims of coherent spiral arm segments extending 2-4 kpc and the specific geometries (20° Perseus pitch, 10 kpc Local arm) depend on accurate subtraction of warp/corrugation vertical displacements to recover in-plane (x,y) locations. No quantitative validation, residual error budget, or test of how subtraction residuals affect arm coherence at large radii is described, which is load-bearing for the extension and curvature results.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the robustness of the warp and corrugation corrections is crucial for the reliability of the spiral arm extensions. In the revised version, we have included a new appendix with quantitative validation tests. These include an error budget for the residual vertical displacements after correction, derived from the uncertainties in the warp model parameters. Additionally, we performed Monte Carlo simulations by adding random residuals to the corrected positions and re-identifying the arm segments, showing that the coherence and curvature of the Perseus and Local arms are preserved at the reported scales. This supports the extension by 2-4 kpc and the 20° pitch angle. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the fitted values h_{Z⊙} and h_fl are reported with uncertainties, yet no details are given on the fitting procedure, data cuts, or how selection function and warp models were jointly applied, preventing assessment of whether the reported uncertainties fully capture systematic effects.

    Authors: We acknowledge the lack of detail in the original submission regarding the fitting process. We have expanded the Methods section to describe the data selection criteria (e.g., age cuts, distance limits, and quality flags), the maximum-likelihood fitting procedure used to jointly model the vertical density profile while accounting for the survey selection function and the warp-induced displacements. The uncertainties now explicitly include both statistical and systematic components from the warp model variations. These additions allow readers to fully assess the robustness of h_{Z⊙} = 77 ± 4 pc and h_fl = 3.5 ± 0.3 kpc. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports direct positional mapping of ~16000 young giant stars after explicit corrections for survey selection, Galactic warp, and corrugations. The flare scale length (h_fl = 3.5 kpc) and spiral arm segments (Perseus pitch ~20°, Local arm ~10 kpc) are presented as measured outcomes from the corrected (x,y,z) coordinates, not as quantities defined by or fitted to the same arm geometry. No equations reduce reported structures to self-referential inputs, no predictions are statistically forced by prior fits, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are invoked to justify the central claims. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on two domain assumptions about stellar tracers and survey modeling plus two fitted scale parameters extracted from the data; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • flare radial scale length h_fl = 3.5 kpc
    Exponential scale fitted to the observed radial increase in vertical thickness of the young-giant sample.
  • local vertical scale height h_Z⊙ = 77 pc
    Vertical scale height fitted to the local young-giant subsample.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Young giant stars remain close to their birth radii and heights and therefore faithfully trace the present-day thin-disc structure.
    Invoked when interpreting the 3D positions as a direct map of the disc flare and arms.
  • domain assumption The survey selection function together with warp and corrugation displacements can be modeled accurately enough to remove bias from the derived scale height.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as a necessary step whose omission would produce significant bias.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 1569 out tokens · 43310 ms · 2026-05-14T20:25:04.271754+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Robin, A

    Amˆores, E. B., Robin, A. C., & Reyl´e, C. 2017, A&A, 602, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628461

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628461 2017

  2. [2]

    2023, ApJS, 267, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd53e

    Andrae, R., Rix, H.-W., & Chandra, V . 2023, ApJS, 267, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd53e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acd53e 2023

  3. [3]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.15473, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.15473

    Ard`evol, J., Semczuk, M., Antoja, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.15473, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.15473

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.15473 2025

  4. [4]

    S., & Baba, J

    Asano, T., Kawata, D., Fujii, M. S., & Baba, J. 2024, MNRAS, 529, L7, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad190

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad190 2024

  5. [5]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. 2015, PASP, 127, 994, doi: 10.1086/683116 20

    work page doi:10.1086/683116 2015

  6. [6]

    W., Koposov, S

    Belokurov, V ., Erkal, D., Evans, N. W., Koposov, S. E., & Deason, A. J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 611, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty982

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty982 2018

  7. [7]

    S., Yong, D., & Mel´endez, J

    Bensby, T., Alves-Brito, A., Oey, M. S., Yong, D., & Mel´endez, J. 2011, ApJL, 735, L46, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/L46

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/l46 2011

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Binney, J., & Vasiliev, E. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1832, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad094

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad094 2023

  9. [10]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 Bogd´ an,´A., Forman, W

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. 2016b, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

  10. [11]

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Maloney, P. R. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 254, Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift, ed. J. S. Mulchaey & J. T. Stocke, 267, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0110044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0110044 2002

  11. [12]

    Bobylev, V . V . 2022, Astronomy Letters, 48, 126, doi: 10.1134/S1063773722010017

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773722010017 2022

  12. [13]

    M., Schlafly, E

    Bovy, J., Rix, H.-W., Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 818, 130, doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/130

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/130 2016

  13. [14]

    2012, ApJ, 753, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/148

    Bovy, J., Rix, H.-W., Liu, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/148

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/148 2012

  14. [15]

    Pontzen and F

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x 2012

  15. [16]

    Castro-Ginard, A., Brown, A. G. A., Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346547

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346547 2023

  16. [17]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 1068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    Chen, Y ., Bressan, A., Girardi, L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1281 2015

  17. [18]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605 Chrob´akov´a, ˇZ., Nagy, R., & L´opez-Corredoira, M

    Chen, Y ., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1605 Chrob´akov´a, ˇZ., Nagy, R., & L´opez-Corredoira, M. 2022, A&A, 664, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243296 De Angeli, F., Weiler, M., Montegriffo, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243680

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1605 2014

  18. [19]

    I., Fedorov, P

    Denyshchenko, S. I., Fedorov, P. N., Akhmetov, V . S., Velichko, A. B., & Dmytrenko, A. M. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1472, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3350

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3350 2024

  19. [20]

    Drimmel, R., Khanna, S., Poggio, E., & Skowron, D. M. 2025, A&A, 698, A230, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451100

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451100 2025

  20. [21]

    2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 210, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/aaef8b

    Drimmel, R., & Poggio, E. 2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 210, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/aaef8b

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aaef8b 2018

  21. [22]

    D., & Babu, G

    Feigelson, E. D., & Babu, G. J. 2012, Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy

    2012

  22. [23]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  23. [24]

    1981, Zeitschrift f¨ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 57, 210, doi: 10.1007/BF01025868

    Freedman, D., & Diaconis, P. 1981, Zeitschrift f¨ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 57, 210, doi: 10.1007/BF01025868

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01025868 1981

  24. [25]

    2002, ARA&A, 40, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840

    Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 2002

  25. [26]

    2024, MNRAS, 533, 4324, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2041 Gaia Collaboration, Drimmel, R., Romero-G´omez, M., et al

    Funakoshi, N., Matsunaga, N., Kawata, D., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 4324, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2041 Gaia Collaboration, Drimmel, R., Romero-G´omez, M., et al. 2023a, A&A, 674, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243797 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023b, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 Gaia Collaboration, Recio-Bla...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2041 2024

  26. [27]

    M., & Georgelin, Y

    Georgelin, Y . M., & Georgelin, Y . P. 1976, A&A, 49, 57

    1976

  27. [28]

    Galactic structure towards the South Pole and the Galactic thick disc

    Gilmore, G., & Reid, N. 1983, MNRAS, 202, 1025, doi: 10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025 1983

  28. [29]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 95, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023354 GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Aimar, N., et al

    Girardi, L. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 95, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023354 GRA VITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Aimar, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, L12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142465 G´orski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023354 2016

  29. [30]

    H., et al

    Helmi, A., Babusiaux, C., Koppelman, H. H., et al. 2018, Nature, 563, 85, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x 2018

  30. [31]

    G., & Han, J

    Hou, L. G., & Han, J. L. 2014, A&A, 569, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424039

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424039 2014

  31. [32]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Hunt, E. L., & Reffert, S. 2023, A&A, 673, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346285 2023

  32. [33]

    Hunt, J. A. S., & Vasiliev, E. 2025, NewAR, 100, 101721, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2024.101721 2025

  33. [34]

    Kalberla, P. M. W., & Kerp, J. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101823

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101823 2009

  34. [35]

    Moustakas, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 688, 254, doi: 10.1086/591958

    work page doi:10.1086/591958 2008

  35. [36]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 5002, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad233

    Khanna, S., Sharma, S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Hayden, M. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5002, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad233

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad233 2023

  36. [37]

    2025, A&A, 701, A270, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452798

    Khanna, S., Yu, J., Drimmel, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A270, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452798

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452798 2025

  37. [38]

    A., de Souza, R

    Kuhn, M. A., de Souza, R. S., Krone-Martins, A., et al. 2021a, ApJS, 254, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abe465

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abe465

  38. [39]

    A., Benjamin, R

    Kuhn, M. A., Benjamin, R. A., Zucker, C., et al. 2021b, A&A, 651, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141198

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141198

  39. [40]

    S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C

    Levine, E. S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C. 2006a, ApJ, 643, 881, doi: 10.1086/503091

    work page doi:10.1086/503091

  40. [41]

    S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C

    Levine, E. S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C. 2006b, Science, 312, 1773, doi: 10.1126/science.1128455

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1128455

  41. [42]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 208, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa17 L´opez-Corredoira, M., Cabrera-Lavers, A., Garz´on, F., &

    Li, C., Zhao, G., Jia, Y ., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 208, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa17 L´opez-Corredoira, M., Cabrera-Lavers, A., Garz´on, F., &

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafa17 2019

  42. [43]

    Hammersley, P. L. 2002, A&A, 394, 883, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021175

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021175 2002

  43. [44]

    Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832964

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832964 2018

  44. [45]

    Marocco, F., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Fowler, J. W., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd805 21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abd805 2021

  45. [46]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 1574, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac642

    Martinez-Medina, L., P´erez-Villegas, A., & Peimbert, A. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1574, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac642

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac642 2022

  46. [47]

    2025, MNRAS, 542, L94, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf075

    Martinez-Medina, L., Poggio, E., & Moreno-Hilario, E. 2025, MNRAS, 542, L94, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf075

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf075 2025

  47. [48]

    1997, A&A, 327, 325

    May, J., Alvarez, H., & Bronfman, L. 1997, A&A, 327, 325

    1997

  48. [49]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 583, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2952

    Mazzi, A., Girardi, L., Trabucchi, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 583, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2952

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2952 2024

  49. [50]

    2014, A&A, 572, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423487

    Minchev, I., Chiappini, C., & Martig, M. 2014, A&A, 572, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423487

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423487 2014

  50. [51]

    C., et al

    Minchev, I., Famaey, B., Quillen, A. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219714

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219714 2012

  51. [52]

    2015, ApJL, 804, L9, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L9

    Minchev, I., Martig, M., Streich, D., et al. 2015, ApJL, 804, L9, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L9

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/l9 2015

  52. [53]

    2006, A&A, 451, 515, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054081

    Momany, Y ., Zaggia, S., Gilmore, G., et al. 2006, A&A, 451, 515, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054081

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054081 2006

  53. [54]

    2023, A&A, 674, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243880

    Montegriffo, P., De Angeli, F., Andrae, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243880

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243880 2023

  54. [55]

    2003, PASJ, 55, 191, doi: 10.1093/pasj/55.1.191 Nordstr¨om, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J., et al

    Nakanishi, H., & Sofue, Y . 2003, PASJ, 55, 191, doi: 10.1093/pasj/55.1.191 Nordstr¨om, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 989, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035959

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/55.1.191 2003

  55. [56]

    A., Recio-Blanco, A., Poggio, E., et al

    Palicio, P. A., Recio-Blanco, A., Poggio, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245026

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245026 2023

  56. [57]

    A., Recio-Blanco, A., Tepper-Garc´ıa, T., et al

    Palicio, P. A., Recio-Blanco, A., Tepper-Garc´ıa, T., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453611 Pantaleoni Gonz´alez, M., Ma´ız Apell´aniz, J., Barb´a, R. H., & Reed, B. C. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2968, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab688

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453611 2025

  57. [58]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 5666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz725

    Pastorelli, G., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 5666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz725

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz725 2019

  58. [59]

    2021, A&A, 651, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140687

    Poggio, E., Drimmel, R., Cantat-Gaudin, T., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140687

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140687 2021

  59. [60]

    A., et al

    Poggio, E., Recio-Blanco, A., Palicio, P. A., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244361

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244361 2022

  60. [61]

    2025, A&A, 699, A199, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451668

    Poggio, E., Khanna, S., Drimmel, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A199, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451668

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451668 2025

  61. [62]

    K., & Khanna, S

    Prusty, A. K., & Khanna, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.11383, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.11383

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.11383 2025

  62. [63]

    R., Loebman, S

    Quinn, J. R., Loebman, S. R., Daniel, K. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 363, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be1 2026

  63. [64]

    J., Hernquist, L., & Fullagar, D

    Quinn, P. J., Hernquist, L., & Fullagar, D. P. 1993, ApJ, 403, 74, doi: 10.1086/172184

    work page doi:10.1086/172184 1993

  64. [65]

    L., Wright, N

    Quintana, A. L., Wright, N. J., & Mart´ınez Garc´ıa, J. 2025a, MNRAS, 538, 1367, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf083

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf083

  65. [66]

    A new Gaia census of OB associations within 1 kpc

    Quintana, A. L., Wright, N. J., Kormann, L. A., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05854. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05854

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11 2019

  67. [68]

    2013, A&A Rv, 21, 61, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0061-8

    Rix, H.-W., & Bovy, J. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 61, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0061-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0061-8 2013

  68. [69]

    2003, A&A, 397, 133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021504

    Russeil, D. 2003, A&A, 397, 133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021504

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021504 2003

  69. [70]

    Scott, D. W. 1979, Biometrika, 66, 605, doi: 10.1093/biomet/66.3.605

    work page doi:10.1093/biomet/66.3.605 1979

  70. [71]

    2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 159, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/159 S¨oding, L., Edenhofer, G., Enßlin, T

    Shen, J., & Zheng, X.-W. 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 159, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/159 S¨oding, L., Edenhofer, G., Enßlin, T. A., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451361

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/159 2020

  71. [72]

    H., & Cordes, J

    Taylor, J. H., & Cordes, J. M. 1993, ApJ, 411, 674, doi: 10.1086/172870

    work page doi:10.1086/172870 1993

  72. [73]

    Toth, G., & Ostriker, J. P. 1992, ApJ, 389, 5, doi: 10.1086/171185

    work page doi:10.1086/171185 1992

  73. [74]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 4863, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3525

    Uppal, N., Ganesh, S., & Schultheis, M. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 4863, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3525

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3525 2024

  74. [75]

    Vallee, J. P. 1995, ApJ, 454, 119, doi: 10.1086/176470 Vall´ee, J. P. 2017a, The Astronomical Review, 13, 113, doi: 10.1080/21672857.2017.1379459 Vall´ee, J. P. 2017b, NewAR, 79, 49, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2017.09.001 van der Kruit, P. C., & Freeman, K. C. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 301, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-083109-153241

    work page doi:10.1086/176470 1995

  75. [76]

    , keywords =

    Vasiliev, E., & Baumgardt, H. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1475 Villalobos, ´A., & Helmi, A. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1806, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13979.x

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1475 2021

  76. [77]

    T., Zinn, J

    Warfield, J. T., Zinn, J. C., Schonhut-Stasik, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 208, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad33bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad33bb 2024

  77. [78]

    Widmark, A., & Naik, A. P. 2024, A&A, 686, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449199

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449199 2024

  78. [79]

    V ., & Hunt, J

    Widmark, A., Tavangar, K., Kalish, J., Johnston, K. V ., & Hunt, J. A. S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.19579, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.19579

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.19579 2025

  79. [80]

    Pulsars and the Warp of the Galaxy

    Yusifov, I. 2004, in The Magnetized Interstellar Medium, ed. B. Uyaniker, W. Reich, & R. Wielebinski, 165–169, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405517

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0405517 2004

  80. [81]

    2021, A&A, 650, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039726

    Zari, E., Rix, H.-W., Frankel, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039726

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039726 2021

Showing first 80 references.