arxiv: 2605.12907 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Grassmann tensor networks

Jian-Gang Kong , Jia-Ji Zhu , Z. Y. Xie

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 19:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords tensorgrassmannmethodsnetworkphysicsfermionicsystemsalgebra

0 comments

The pith

Grassmann tensor networks are introduced from basic operations to algorithm Grassmannization and validated on models from particle physics and condensed matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Fermions like electrons follow special rules where swapping two particles changes the sign of the wavefunction. Tensor networks represent large quantum systems by connecting small tensors in a network to avoid exponential cost. Grassmann algebra supplies anticommuting numbers that match fermion statistics in path integrals. The paper walks through how to perform tensor operations with these Grassmann numbers and converts common tensor-network algorithms such as renormalization or contraction into their Grassmann versions. It then tests the resulting methods on example models from both condensed-matter and particle-physics settings.

Core claim

Grassmann tensor network methods offer powerful numerical tools for fermionic many-body systems in the coherent-state path-integral representation and are validated in several interesting models in both particle physics and condensed matter physics.

Load-bearing premise

That the Grassmann tensor operations and their Grassmannized algorithms can be implemented efficiently enough for practical simulations of strongly correlated systems without prohibitive computational overhead or sign problems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12907 by Jia-Ji Zhu, Jian-Gang Kong, Z. Y. Xie.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Decompose a rank-4 Grassmann tensor T to two rank-3 Grassmann tensors A and B by singular value decomposition, as expressed in Eqs. (43-44). Note, in Eqs. (41-42), the Λ is a positive definite diagonal matrix with no Grassmann counterpart defined, U˜ is a column-wise orthogonal matrix, and V˜ is row-wise orthogonal. Once Eq. (41) is obtained, then we can absorb the ordinary matrix Λ into U and V to obtain… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: An effective (1+1)-dimensional lattice with coordinates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) The decomposition of the Grassmann exponents, as expressed in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The Grassmann generalization of the (a) left-canonical condition and (b) right-canonical   [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Ground-state properties of the half-filled Hubbard model given by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Free energy density f versus inverse temperature β for the one-dimensional free-fermion model at µ = 2.0, obtained via the Grassmann TEBD algorithm in the coherent-state path-integral formalism. Curves correspond to different temporal steps ϵ and bond dimensions χ. The black line indicates the exact analytic result [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Relative error δf of the free energy density for the single-flavor, non-interacting GNW model at m = −1.2, comparing Grassmann CTMRG, Grassmann TEBD, and Grassmann TRG methods at various bond dimensions χ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Applying the Grassmann gate G (α) to bond α in the Grassmann SU algorithm involves the following steps: (i) preprocessing, (ii) contraction and truncation and (iii) renormalization, leading to updated local tensors A, B and Λα. as Amk1k2k3 = Amk1k2k3ψ¯p(m) m ¯ξ p(k1) 1 ¯ξ p(k2) 2 ¯ξ p(k3) 3 , (227) Bnk1l2l3 = Bnk1l2l3ψ¯p(n) n ξ p(k1) 1 ξ p(l2) 2 ξ p(l3) 3 , (228) G (α) ijmn = G (α) ijmnφ¯ p(i) i φ¯ p(j) j … view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Energy per link for the free-fermion model in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: For the t-V1-V2 model at V1 = −1.0 and V2 = 0.5: (a) Convergence of the particle density n with Grassmann CTMRG environment dimension χ at µ = 0. (b) Energy per site Es versus particle density n. Red cross denotes data from the large-scale (non-Grassmann) DMRG calculation. At µ = 0.0, the particle-hole symmetry of the Hamiltonian dictates an exact average density of n = 0.5. This is confirmed numerically… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Developing non-perturbative methods to reveal exotic properties of strongly correlated fermionic systems remains one of the most essential tasks of theoretical physics. Tensor network methods with Grassmann algebra offer powerful numerical tools for fermionic many-body systems in the coherent-state path-integral representation. Despite their vast potential for both condensed-matter and particle-physics communities, Grassmann tensor network methods are somewhat underexploited in practical simulations. In this work, we provide a detailed, self-contained introduction to Grassmann tensor network methods, from the basics of the Grassmann tensor operations to the Grassmannization of typical tensor network algorithms. Furthermore, the resulting Grassmann tensor network methods are validated in several interesting models in both particle physics and condensed matter physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a solid methods paper offering a self-contained introduction to Grassmann tensor networks by converting standard algorithms for fermions and testing them on models from both condensed matter and particle physics.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors deliver a practical, step-by-step guide to Grassmann tensor operations and how to adapt common tensor-network algorithms like renormalization or contraction to handle Grassmann algebra in the coherent-state path integral. This makes the approach more usable for fermionic systems without relying on external references for the basics. They then apply the resulting methods to several models across particle physics and condensed matter, which shows the framework can address strongly correlated cases in both areas. The self-contained style and lack of circular derivations are clear strengths here, and the cross-field examples help demonstrate relevance without overclaiming new physics results. The soft spots are limited but real: the validations are summarized at a high level, so without full error controls, scaling data, or direct comparisons to alternatives like determinant Monte Carlo or prior fermionic tensor networks, it's difficult to judge how competitive or efficient the Grassmannized versions are at larger sizes. The assumption that the extra algebra overhead stays manageable in practice is plausible but would need more explicit support. This paper is aimed at researchers already familiar with tensor networks who need to incorporate fermions properly, whether in materials modeling or lattice gauge theories. A reader wanting implementation guidance and worked examples will find it worthwhile. It deserves serious peer review as a methods contribution that can help standardize these tools for the community.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a detailed, self-contained introduction to Grassmann tensor network methods for fermionic many-body systems in the coherent-state path-integral representation. It covers the fundamentals of Grassmann tensor operations, the Grassmannization of standard tensor network algorithms, and reports validations of the resulting methods on several models drawn from both particle physics and condensed matter physics.

Significance. If the validations hold under scrutiny, the work has clear value in lowering the barrier to practical use of Grassmann tensor networks for strongly correlated fermions, a class of methods that the abstract correctly notes remains underexploited. The self-contained derivation of the operations and algorithms is a concrete strength that could facilitate adoption across communities.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that validations were performed on several models but does not name the models or the key observables; adding one sentence would improve the reader's immediate grasp of the scope without lengthening the abstract.
[Basics of Grassmann tensor operations] In the sections introducing Grassmann tensor operations, the distinction between the Grassmann parity and the tensor indices could be illustrated with a small explicit example to aid readers unfamiliar with the algebra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation for minor revision. The report correctly identifies the manuscript's self-contained introduction to Grassmann tensor operations and algorithms, along with validations across particle-physics and condensed-matter models. No specific major comments were raised that require point-by-point rebuttal.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper frames itself as a self-contained introduction to Grassmann tensor operations and algorithms, starting from standard Grassmann algebra basics and proceeding to Grassmannized tensor network methods without any load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. Validations on models are presented as applications of the derived methods rather than circular predictions. No equations or claims in the abstract or described structure exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard mathematical properties of Grassmann algebra and tensor-network contraction rules already present in the prior literature; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or postulated entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

standard math Grassmann algebra supplies anticommuting variables that correctly encode fermionic statistics in coherent-state path integrals
Invoked as the foundation for the entire representation of fermionic systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5414 in / 1183 out tokens · 54133 ms · 2026-05-14T19:07:02.002455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

J. Hubbard. Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 276(1365):238–257, 11 1963

1963
[2]

F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice. Effective hamiltonian for the superconducting cu oxides. Phys. Rev. B, 37:3759–3761, Mar 1988

1988
[3]

P. W. Anderson. Localized magnetic states in metals.Phys. Rev., 124:41–53, Oct 1961

1961
[4]

Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys

Jun Kondo. Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 32:41–53, July 1964

1964
[5]

Springer New York, NY, 1994

Assa Auerbach.Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism. Springer New York, NY, 1994

1994
[6]

Kenneth G. Wilson. Confinement of quarks.Phys. Rev. D, 10:2445–2459, Oct 1974

1974
[7]

Nambu and G

Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio. Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. i.Phys. Rev., 122:345–358, Apr 1961

1961
[8]

J. C. Umrigar M. P. Nightingale.Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry. Springer, 1999

1999
[9]

H. H. Zhao, Z. Y. Xie, Q. N. Chen, Z. C. Wei, J. W. Cai, and T. Xiang. Renormalization of tensor-network states.Phys. Rev. B, 81:174411, May 2010. 65

2010
[10]

Verstraete and J

F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac. Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions.Arxiv, abs/0407066, 2004

work page arXiv 2004
[11]

Springer, 2020

Shi-Ju Ran, Emanuele Tirrito, Cheng Peng, Xi Chen, Luca Tagliacozzo, Gang Su, and Maciej Lewenstein.TensorNetwork Contractions. Springer, 2020

2020
[12]

Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization

Tao Xiang. Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization. Cambridge University Press, 2023

2023
[13]

H. J. Liao, Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, Z. Y. Liu, H. D. Xie, R. Z. Huang, B. Nor- mand, and T. Xiang. Gapless spin-liquid ground state in thes= 1/2kagome antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:137202, Mar 2017

2017
[14]

Tensor network study of the spin- 1 2 square-latticeJ 1−J2−J3 model: Incommensurate spiral order, mixed valence-bond solids, and multi- critical points

Wen-Yuan Liu, Didier Poilblanc, Shou-Shu Gong, Wei-Qiang Chen, and Zheng- Cheng Gu. Tensor network study of the spin- 1 2 square-latticeJ 1−J2−J3 model: Incommensurate spiral order, mixed valence-bond solids, and multi- critical points. Phys. Rev. B, 109:235116, Jun 2024

2024
[15]

Yang Liu, Shiqi Shao, Saisai He, Z. Y. Xie, Jia-Wei Mei, Hong-Gang Luo, and Jize Zhao. Quantum dynamics in a spin-1 2 square latticeJ1−J2−δaltermagnet. Phys. Rev. B, 111:245117, Jun 2025

2025
[16]

Ignacio Cirac, and David Pérez-García

Norbert Schuch, Didier Poilblanc, J. Ignacio Cirac, and David Pérez-García. Topological order in the projected entangled-pair states formalism: Transfer operator and boundary hamiltonians.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:090501, Aug 2013

2013
[17]

Rui Wang, Tao Yang, Z. Y. Xie, Baigeng Wang, and X. C. Xie. Susceptibility indicator for chiral topological orders emergent from correlated fermions.Phys. Rev. B, 109:L241113, Jun 2024

2024
[18]

Continuous matrix product states for quantum fields: An energy minimization algorithm.Phys

Martin Ganahl, Julián Rincón, and Guifre Vidal. Continuous matrix product states for quantum fields: An energy minimization algorithm.Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:220402, Jun 2017

2017
[19]

Ignacio Cirac

Antoine Tilloy and J. Ignacio Cirac. Continuous tensor network states for quantum fields.Phys. Rev. X, 9:021040, May 2019

2019
[20]

Michael Levin and Cody P. Nave. Tensor renormalization group approach to two-dimensional classical lattice models.Phys.Rev. Lett., 99:120601, Sep 2007

2007
[21]

Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, M. P. Qin, J. W. Zhu, L. P. Yang, and T. Xiang. Coarse- graining renormalization by higher-order singular value decomposition.Phys. Rev. B, 86:045139, Jul 2012

2012
[22]

Competing orders in the honeycomb latticet−jmodel

Zheng-Tao Xu, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Shuo Yang. Competing orders in the honeycomb latticet−jmodel. Phys. Rev. B, 108:035144, Jul 2023

2023
[23]

Improved energy extrapolation with infinite projected entangled-pair states applied to the two-dimensional hubbard model

Philippe Corboz. Improved energy extrapolation with infinite projected entangled-pair states applied to the two-dimensional hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B, 93:045116, Jan 2016. 66

2016
[24]

Philippe Corboz, T. M. Rice, and Matthias Troyer. Competing states in thet-j model: Uniformd-wave state versus stripe state.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:046402, Jul 2014

2014
[25]

Über das paulische äquivalenzverbot

Pascual Jordan and Eugene Wigner. Über das paulische äquivalenzverbot. Zeitschrift für Physik, 47(9):631–651, 1928

1928
[26]

Simula- tion of interacting fermions with entanglement renormalization.Phys

Philippe Corboz, Glen Evenbly, Frank Verstraete, and Guifré Vidal. Simula- tion of interacting fermions with entanglement renormalization.Phys. Rev. A, 81:010303, Jan 2010

2010
[27]

Unitary circuits for strongly correlated fermions

Carlos Pineda, Thomas Barthel, and Jens Eisert. Unitary circuits for strongly correlated fermions. Phys. Rev. A, 81:050303, May 2010

2010
[28]

Kraus, Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete, and J

Christina V. Kraus, Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Fermionic projected entangled pair states.Phys. Rev. A, 81:052338, May 2010

2010
[29]

Contraction of fermionic operator circuits and the simulation of strongly correlated fermions.Phys

Thomas Barthel, Carlos Pineda, and Jens Eisert. Contraction of fermionic operator circuits and the simulation of strongly correlated fermions.Phys. Rev. A, 80:042333, Oct 2009

2009
[30]

Fermionic implementation of projected entangled pair states algorithm.Phys

Iztok Pižorn and Frank Verstraete. Fermionic implementation of projected entangled pair states algorithm.Phys. Rev. B, 81:245110, Jun 2010

2010
[31]

Fermionic multiscale entanglement renor- malization ansatz

Philippe Corboz and Guifré Vidal. Fermionic multiscale entanglement renor- malization ansatz. Phys. Rev. B, 80:165129, Oct 2009

2009
[32]

Simulation of strongly correlated fermions in two spatial dimensions with fermionic projected entangled-pair states.Phys

Philippe Corboz, Román Orús, Bela Bauer, and Guifré Vidal. Simulation of strongly correlated fermions in two spatial dimensions with fermionic projected entangled-pair states.Phys. Rev. B, 81:165104, Apr 2010

2010
[33]

Sukhwinder Singh, Robert N. C. Pfeifer, and Guifre Vidal. Tensor network states and algorithms in the presence of a global u(1) symmetry.Phys. Rev. B, 83:115125, Mar 2011

2011
[34]

Tensor network states and algorithms in the presence of a global su(2) symmetry.Phys

Sukhwinder Singh and Guifre Vidal. Tensor network states and algorithms in the presence of a global su(2) symmetry.Phys. Rev. B, 86:195114, Nov 2012

2012
[35]

Rams, Gabriela Wójtowicz, Aritra Sinha, and Juraj Hasik

Marek M. Rams, Gabriela Wójtowicz, Aritra Sinha, and Juraj Hasik. Yastn: Yet another symmetric tensor networks; a python library for abelian symmetric tensor network calculations.SciPost Phys. Codebases, page 52, 2025

2025
[36]

Devos and J

Lukas Devos and Jutho Haegeman. Tensorkit.jl: A julia package for large-scale tensor computations, with a hint of category theory.Arxiv, abs/2508.10076, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Advances on tensor network theory: symmetries, fermions, en- tanglement, and holography.Eur

Román Orús. Advances on tensor network theory: symmetries, fermions, en- tanglement, and holography.Eur. Phys. J. B, 87(0):280, 2014. 67

2014
[38]

White, Guifré Vidal, and Matthias Troyer

Philippe Corboz, Steven R. White, Guifré Vidal, and Matthias Troyer. Stripes in the two-dimensionalt-jmodel with infinite projected entangled-pair states. Phys. Rev. B, 84:041108, Jul 2011

2011
[39]

topological quantum phase transitions of attractive spinless fermions in a honeycomb lattice

P. Corboz, S. Capponi, A. M. Läuchli, B. Bauer, and R. Orús. Comment on “topological quantum phase transitions of attractive spinless fermions in a honeycomb lattice” by poletti d. et al.Europhysics Letters, 98(2):27005, apr 2012

2012
[40]

Fermionic quantum critical point of spinless fermions on a honeycomb lattice

Lei Wang, Philippe Corboz, and Matthias Troyer. Fermionic quantum critical point of spinless fermions on a honeycomb lattice. New Journal of Physics, 16(10):103008, oct 2014

2014
[41]

Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R

Bo-Xiao Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Ming-Pu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional hubbard model. Science, 358(6367):1155–1160, 2017

2017
[42]

Chung, and Philippe Corboz

Boris Ponsioen, Sangwoo S. Chung, and Philippe Corboz. Period 4 stripe in the extended two-dimensional hubbard model.Phys. Rev. B, 100:195141, Nov 2019

2019
[43]

A beginner’s guide to non-abelian iPEPS for correlated fermions.SciPost Phys

Benedikt Bruognolo, Jheng-Wei Li, Jan von Delft, and Andreas Weichselbaum. A beginner’s guide to non-abelian iPEPS for correlated fermions.SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, page 25, 2021

2021
[44]

Study of spin symmetry in the dopedt−jmodel using infinite projected en- tangled pair states.Phys

Jheng-Wei Li, Benedikt Bruognolo, Andreas Weichselbaum, and Jan von Delft. Study of spin symmetry in the dopedt−jmodel using infinite projected en- tangled pair states.Phys. Rev. B, 103:075127, Feb 2021

2021
[45]

Chung, and Philippe Corboz

Boris Ponsioen, Sangwoo S. Chung, and Philippe Corboz. Superconducting stripes in the hole-doped three-band hubbard model.Phys.Rev. B, 108:205154, Nov 2023

2023
[46]

Chung and Philippe Corboz

Sangwoo S. Chung and Philippe Corboz. Su(3) fermions on the honeycomb lattice at 1 3 filling. Phys. Rev. B, 100:035134, Jul 2019

2019
[47]

Orbital-selective superconductivity in the pressurized bilayer nickelatela3ni2o7: An infinite projected entangled-pair state study

Jialin Chen, Fan Yang, and Wei Li. Orbital-selective superconductivity in the pressurized bilayer nickelatela3ni2o7: An infinite projected entangled-pair state study. Phys. Rev. B, 110:L041111, Jul 2024

2024
[48]

Frustration-induced superconductivity in thet−t ′ hubbard model

Changkai Zhang, Jheng-Wei Li, Dimitra Nikolaidou, and Jan von Delft. Frustration-induced superconductivity in thet−t ′ hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 134:116502, Mar 2025

2025
[49]

Grassmann tensor network states and its renormalization for strongly correlated fermionic and bosonic states

Zheng-Cheng Gu, Frank Verstraete, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Grassmann tensor network states and its renormalization for strongly correlated fermionic and bosonic states. Arxiv, abs/1004.2563, 2010. 68

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[50]

Béri and N

B. Béri and N. R. Cooper. Local tensor network for strongly correlated projec- tive states.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:156401, Apr 2011

2011
[51]

Tensor-entanglement renormalization group approach as a unified method for symmetry breaking and topological phase transitions.Phys

Zheng-Cheng Gu, Michael Levin, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Tensor-entanglement renormalization group approach as a unified method for symmetry breaking and topological phase transitions.Phys. Rev. B, 78:205116, Nov 2008

2008
[52]

Efficientsimulationofgrassmanntensorproductstates

Zheng-ChengGu. Efficientsimulationofgrassmanntensorproductstates. Phys. Rev. B, 88:115139, Sep 2013

2013
[53]

Zheng-Cheng Gu, Hong-Chen Jiang, D. N. Sheng, Hong Yao, Leon Balents, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Time-reversal symmetry breaking superconducting ground state in the doped mott insulator on the honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B, 88:155112, Oct 2013

2013
[54]

Symmetry-protected topological orders for interacting fermions: Fermionic topological nonlinearσmodels and a special group supercohomology theory.Phys

Zheng-Cheng Gu and Xiao-Gang Wen. Symmetry-protected topological orders for interacting fermions: Fermionic topological nonlinearσmodels and a special group supercohomology theory.Phys. Rev. B, 90:115141, Sep 2014

2014
[55]

Combining Grassmann algebra with entanglement renormalization method

Jie Lou and Yan Chen. Combining grassmann algebra with entanglement renor- malization method. Arxiv, abs/1506.03716, 2015

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[56]

Baskaran

Zheng-Cheng Gu, Hong-Chen Jiang, and G. Baskaran. Emergence ofp+ip superconductivity in two-dimensional doped dirac systems. Phys. Rev. B, 101:205147, May 2020

2020
[57]

Spin-charge separation and unconventional superconductivity in thet−jmodel on the honeycomb lattice

Jian-Jian Miao, Zheng-Yuan Yue, Hao Zhang, Wei-Qiang Chen, and Zheng- Cheng Gu. Spin-charge separation and unconventional superconductivity in thet−jmodel on the honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B, 111:174518, May 2025

2025
[58]

Pseudogap phase as fluctuating pair density wave.Arxiv, abs/2404.16770, 2024

Zheng-Yuan Yue, Zheng-Tao Xu, Shuo Yang, and Zheng-Cheng Gu. Pseudogap phase as fluctuating pair density wave.Arxiv, abs/2404.16770, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Accurate simulation of the hubbard model with finite fermionic projected entangled pair states.Phys

Wen-Yuan Liu, Huanchen Zhai, Ruojing Peng, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Accurate simulation of the hubbard model with finite fermionic projected entangled pair states.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134:256502, Jun 2025

2025
[60]

P. W. Anderson. The resonating valence bond state in la2cuo4 and supercon- ductivity. Science, 235(4793):1196–1198, 1987

1987
[61]

Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to one-flavor lattice schwinger model.Phys

Yuya Shimizu and Yoshinobu Kuramashi. Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to one-flavor lattice schwinger model.Phys. Rev. D, 90:014508, Jul 2014

2014
[62]

Higher-order tensor renor- malization group for relativistic fermion systems.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2017(6):063B07, 06 2017

Ryo Sakai, Shinji Takeda, and Yusuke Yoshimura. Higher-order tensor renor- malization group for relativistic fermion systems.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2017(6):063B07, 06 2017. 69

2017
[63]

Restoration of chiral symmetry in cold and dense nambu-jona- lasinio model with tensor renormalization group

Shinichiro Akiyama, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Takumi Yamashita, and Yusuke Yoshimura. Restoration of chiral symmetry in cold and dense nambu-jona- lasinio model with tensor renormalization group. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(1):1–17, 2021

2021
[64]

More about the grassmann tensor renormalization group

Shinichiro Akiyama and Daisuke Kadoh. More about the grassmann tensor renormalization group. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(10):1–16, 2021

2021
[65]

Tensor renormalization group for fermions.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 36(34):343002, may 2024

Shinichiro Akiyama, Yannick Meurice, and Ryo Sakai. Tensor renormalization group for fermions.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 36(34):343002, may 2024

2024
[66]

Metal–insulator transition in the (2+1)-dimensional hubbard model with the tensor renormalization group

Shinichiro Akiyama, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, and Takumi Yamashita. Metal–insulator transition in the (2+1)-dimensional hubbard model with the tensor renormalization group. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(2):023I01, 01 2022

2022
[67]

Tensor renormalization group approach to (1 + 1)-dimensional hubbard model.Phys

Shinichiro Akiyama and Yoshinobu Kuramashi. Tensor renormalization group approach to (1 + 1)-dimensional hubbard model.Phys. Rev. D, 104:014504, Jul 2021

2021
[68]

Anisotropic tensor renormal- ization group

Daiki Adachi, Tsuyoshi Okubo, and Synge Todo. Anisotropic tensor renormal- ization group. Phys. Rev. B, 102:054432, Aug 2020

2020
[69]

Lattice model for fermionic toric code.Phys

Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zhenghan Wang, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Lattice model for fermionic toric code.Phys. Rev. B, 90:085140, Aug 2014

2014
[70]

Williamson, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete

Nick Bultinck, Dominic J. Williamson, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. Fermionic matrix product states and one-dimensional topological phases.Phys. Rev. B, 95:075108, Feb 2017

2017
[71]

Fermionic projected entangled-pair states and topological phases.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 51(2):025202, dec 2017

Nick Bultinck, Dominic J Williamson, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. Fermionic projected entangled-pair states and topological phases.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 51(2):025202, dec 2017

2017
[72]

Com- peting pair density wave orders in the square lattice t-j model.Communications Physics, 8(456), nov 2025

Wayne Zheng, Zheng-Yuan Yue, Jian-Hao Zhang, and Zheng-Cheng Gu. Com- peting pair density wave orders in the square lattice t-j model.Communications Physics, 8(456), nov 2025

2025
[73]

Global phase diagram of doped quantum spin liquid on the kagome lattice.Arxiv, abs/2404.05685, 2024

Zheng-Tao Xu, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Shuo Yang. Global phase diagram of doped quantum spin liquid on the kagome lattice.Arxiv, abs/2404.05685, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[74]

Revealing quantum phase string effect in a doped mott insulator: A tensor network state study.Phys

Wayne Zheng, Jia-Xin Zhang, Zheng-Yuan Yue, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Zheng- Yu Weng. Revealing quantum phase string effect in a doped mott insulator: A tensor network state study.Phys. Rev. B, 112:214514, Dec 2025

2025
[75]

Fermionic tensor network methods.SciPost Phys., 18:012, 2025

Quinten Mortier, Lukas Devos, Lander Burgelman, Bram Vanhecke, Nick Bultinck, Frank Verstraete, Jutho Haegeman, and Laurens Vanderstraeten. Fermionic tensor network methods.SciPost Phys., 18:012, 2025. 70

2025
[76]

Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups

Steven R White. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Physical review letters, 69(19):2863, 1992

1992
[77]

The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states

Ulrich Schollwöck. The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annals of Physics, 326(1):96–192, 2011. January 2011 Special Issue

2011
[78]

Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum com- putations

Guifré Vidal. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum com- putations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:147902, Oct 2003

2003
[79]

G. Vidal. Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:070201, Feb 2007

2007
[80]

Infinite time-evolving block decimation algo- rithm beyond unitary evolution

Roman Orus and Guifre Vidal. Infinite time-evolving block decimation algo- rithm beyond unitary evolution. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 78(15):155117, 2008

2008

Showing first 80 references.