arxiv: 2605.13191 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Burst-Mode Ultrafast Laser Welding of Sapphire and Invar Alloy Across Large Interfacial Gaps up to 10 μm

Feng Chen, Guochang Jiang, Nan Li, Qingwei Zhang, Rong Su, Rongxian Wen, Shanglu Yang, Yitong Chen, Yu Wang, Yuxuan Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics

keywords ultrafast laser weldingsapphireInvar alloyburst-mode pulsesinterfacial gapsshear strengthdissimilar materialslaser joining

0 comments

The pith

Burst-mode ultrafast laser pulses bridge 10-micrometer gaps between sapphire and Invar alloy to reach 6.3 MPa shear strength.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates welding sapphire to Invar alloy when the surfaces are separated by controlled gaps of 3 to 10 micrometers. Single-pulse lasers cannot bridge these gaps because energy coupling remains too weak and reactions stay uncontrolled. By delivering energy in timed bursts of sub-pulses, the method allows incremental heating and material flow that forms solid bridges across the gap. At the largest 10-micrometer separation, where ordinary pulses produce no joint, the burst approach yields a maximum shear strength of 6.3 MPa. The results map how gap size, pulse count, and thermal stress together determine whether cracks or strong bonds appear.

Core claim

Burst-mode ultrafast laser welding enables interfacial bridging across gaps up to 10 micrometers between sapphire and Invar alloy, producing a maximum shear strength of 6.3 MPa where single-pulse welding fails entirely. The temporally spaced sub-pulses create cyclic thermal stresses that drive material flow and energy accumulation sufficient to close the gap and form a mechanically robust interface, as confirmed by microscopy, elemental mapping, and shear tests.

What carries the argument

Burst-mode ultrafast laser pulses, which split the energy into a train of temporally spaced sub-pulses to deposit heat incrementally across the gap instead of in one instantaneous event.

If this is right

At 3-micrometer gaps, increasing the number of sub-pulses reduces joint strength because cyclic stresses create transverse micro-crack networks in the sapphire.
Joint morphology and elemental mixing change systematically with gap width, showing a transition from direct fusion at small gaps to bridged structures at larger ones.
Optimization of burst parameters yields reliable dissimilar-material bonds under non-contact conditions that standard lasers cannot achieve.
The maximum 6.3 MPa strength at 10 micrometers exceeds previously reported values for comparable sapphire-metal joints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same burst-timing principle could be tested on other transparent ceramics paired with low-expansion metals to see whether comparable gap-bridging occurs.
Real-time acoustic or thermal monitoring during welding might detect the onset of crack networks early enough to adjust pulse count and preserve strength.
If energy accumulation scales linearly with burst length, the technique might close gaps beyond 10 micrometers by simply lengthening the pulse train.

Load-bearing premise

The observed bridging and strength at large gaps arise primarily from the burst-mode timing rather than from unmeasured details of surface finish, beam focus, or material chemistry.

What would settle it

Reproduce the identical 10-micrometer gap experiment with single pulses under the same surface preparation and focusing conditions and obtain comparable bridging plus 6.3 MPa shear strength.

read the original abstract

Achieving reliable joining between transparent materials and metals under non-optical-contact conditions remains challenging due to limited energy coupling and uncontrolled interfacial reaction across $\mu$m-scale gaps. Burst-mode ultrafast lasers provide a potential solution for large-gap welding through temporally distributed energy deposition. However, the underlying interaction mechanisms and achievable joining limits remain unclear. In this study, burst-mode ultrafast laser welding of sapphire to Invar alloy was investigated under controlled interfacial gaps from 3 to 10 $\mu$m. Cross-sectional microscopy, elemental mapping, white-light interferometry, and shear testing were employed to analyze joint morphology, elemental distribution, fracture behavior, and mechanical performance.After optimization of the processing parameters for burst-mode ultrafast laser welding, the interfacial morphological evolution and joint strength under different gap conditions were systematically investigated. At a 3 $\mu$m gap, cyclic thermal stresses induced by burst pulses generate transverse micro-crack networks in sapphire, accompanied by a reduction in joint strength with increasing sub-pulse numbers. Notably, at a 10 $\mu$m gap, where single-pulse welding fails, burst-mode ultrafast laser welding enables interfacial bridging with a maximum shear strength of 6.3 MPa, representing the highest level among published studies.These results indicate a gap-dependent evolution in burst-mode welding behavior governed by crack formation and energy accumulation. This study provides an important theoretical basis and practical guidance for achieving high-performance joining of dissimilar materials under large gap conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Burst-mode gets sapphire-Invar joints across 10 μm gaps with 6.3 MPa strength where single pulses fail, but the energy-input controls leave the temporal-distribution claim open.

read the letter

The main result is that optimized burst-mode ultrafast laser welding bridges 10 μm gaps between sapphire and Invar, delivering up to 6.3 MPa shear strength while single-pulse runs do not. The paper tracks how joint morphology, elemental mixing, and strength evolve as the gap increases from 3 to 10 μm, using cross-section microscopy, elemental maps, interferometry, and mechanical tests. Those measurements are consistent and give concrete numbers on what gap sizes are reachable and what strength follows. For an experimental study on a specific material pair, the characterization is straightforward and useful. The data also note that at 3 μm gaps, adding more sub-pulses lowers strength through extra cracking, which shows they are paying attention to thermal-stress effects. The soft spot is the attribution of the 10 μm success specifically to the burst timing rather than total energy deposited. The abstract states single-pulse welding fails at that gap but does not report whether those controls matched the total fluence or peak-power conditions of the multi-sub-pulse bursts. If the burst simply delivers more cumulative energy, the advantage cannot be isolated to the temporal spread. That comparison is the load-bearing claim for the mechanism, and it is not fully closed. This work is aimed at researchers and engineers doing laser joining of transparent ceramics to metals when contact is imperfect. The gap limits and strength values are the kind of practical benchmarks that can inform process choices. It deserves peer review; the experimental record is solid enough that referees can tighten the controls and clarify the energy accounting without starting from scratch.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental investigation of burst-mode ultrafast laser welding between sapphire and Invar alloy across controlled interfacial gaps of 3–10 μm. Using cross-sectional microscopy, elemental mapping, white-light interferometry, and shear testing, the authors show gap-dependent interfacial morphology and mechanical performance. They claim that optimized burst-mode parameters enable bridging and joining at 10 μm gaps where single-pulse welding fails, achieving a maximum shear strength of 6.3 MPa (highest reported), with behavior governed by crack formation and energy accumulation from temporally distributed sub-pulses.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold after clarification of controls, the work is significant for practical dissimilar-material joining in optics and precision engineering, where non-contact gaps are common. The demonstration of reliable bridging at 10 μm with quantified strength provides concrete process guidance and extends the known limits of ultrafast laser welding beyond optical-contact conditions.

major comments (2)

[Results (10 μm gap comparison)] Results section (paragraph discussing 10 μm gap trials): The statement that single-pulse welding fails at 10 μm while burst-mode succeeds requires explicit confirmation that the single-pulse control used equivalent total fluence or cumulative energy to the optimized burst (multiple sub-pulses). The 3 μm gap data show strength reduction with increasing sub-pulse number, indicating sensitivity to energy accumulation; without matched total-energy single-pulse controls, the attribution of bridging specifically to temporal distribution (rather than higher total energy input) cannot be isolated.
[Methods (parameter optimization)] Methods/parameter optimization subsection: The abstract and main text provide only high-level descriptions of burst-mode parameter optimization (sub-pulse number, energy distribution, repetition rate). Specific values for total fluence, peak power per sub-pulse, and focusing conditions for both burst and single-pulse trials should be tabulated or stated quantitatively to allow reproduction and to rule out confounding variables such as exact spot size or surface preparation.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure captions for cross-sectional micrographs and shear-test plots should include scale bars, error bars (n= number of replicates), and explicit labeling of single-pulse vs. burst conditions for direct visual comparison.
[Abstract and Discussion] The claim in the abstract that 6.3 MPa is 'the highest level among published studies' should be supported by a brief comparison table or citations in the discussion section rather than left as a standalone assertion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The comments have helped us to clarify important aspects of our experimental design and improve the manuscript's reproducibility. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Results section (paragraph discussing 10 μm gap trials): The statement that single-pulse welding fails at 10 μm while burst-mode succeeds requires explicit confirmation that the single-pulse control used equivalent total fluence or cumulative energy to the optimized burst (multiple sub-pulses). The 3 μm gap data show strength reduction with increasing sub-pulse number, indicating sensitivity to energy accumulation; without matched total-energy single-pulse controls, the attribution of bridging specifically to temporal distribution (rather than higher total energy input) cannot be isolated.

Authors: We appreciate this important point regarding the control experiments. In our study, the single-pulse welding trials at 10 μm gap were conducted with a pulse energy set to match the total cumulative energy of the optimized burst-mode sequence (sum of the sub-pulse energies). This was done to ensure comparable total fluence input. The 3 μm gap results indeed highlight the role of energy accumulation and crack formation, but for the 10 μm case, the temporal distribution allows for better bridging without excessive cracking. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly state the equivalent total fluence used in single-pulse controls and include the specific values in a new table. revision: yes
Referee: Methods/parameter optimization subsection: The abstract and main text provide only high-level descriptions of burst-mode parameter optimization (sub-pulse number, energy distribution, repetition rate). Specific values for total fluence, peak power per sub-pulse, and focusing conditions for both burst and single-pulse trials should be tabulated or stated quantitatively to allow reproduction and to rule out confounding variables such as exact spot size or surface preparation.

Authors: We agree that quantitative details are essential for reproducibility. We will add a dedicated table in the Methods section that lists all key parameters, including total fluence, energy per sub-pulse, number of sub-pulses, repetition rate, focusing conditions (NA, spot size), and surface preparation procedures for both the burst-mode and single-pulse experiments. This will also include the optimized values used for the 10 μm gap joining. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental study with direct measurements only

full rationale

The paper reports experimental results on laser welding parameters, joint morphology, elemental mapping, and shear strength measurements across controlled gaps. No derivations, equations, fitted models, or theoretical predictions are present that could reduce to inputs by construction. All claims rest on direct observations and comparisons to published studies, with no self-citation chains or ansatzes invoked as load-bearing steps. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about ultrafast laser-material interactions and experimental optimization of processing parameters; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

burst-mode parameters (sub-pulse number, energy distribution, repetition rate)
Optimized experimentally for each gap size to achieve joining; specific values chosen to balance energy accumulation against crack formation.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Ultrafast laser pulses deposit energy locally through absorption and plasma-mediated processes to enable melting and bonding across gaps
Invoked implicitly to explain why burst-mode enables bridging where single pulses fail.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5596 in / 1327 out tokens · 58944 ms · 2026-05-14T18:58:27.198251+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
At a 10 μm gap, where single-pulse welding fails, burst-mode ultrafast laser welding enables interfacial bridging with a maximum shear strength of 6.3 MPa... gap-dependent evolution in burst-mode welding behavior governed by crack formation and energy accumulation.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
cyclic thermal stresses induced by burst pulses generate transverse micro-crack networks... ΔK = Y·Δσ·√(πa)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references

[1]

Femtosecond laser welding of sapphire-copper using a thin film titanium interlayer,

H. Yu, J.-X. Zhao, L.-J. Zhang, et al., “Femtosecond laser welding of sapphire-copper using a thin film titanium interlayer,” Opt. Laser Technol. 177, 111063 (2024)

2024
[2]

Laser welding of fiber array units,

S. L. Logunov, M. A. Quesada, L. C. Dabich, et al., “Laser welding of fiber array units,” Appl. Opt. 63(9), 2167–2174 (2024)

2024
[3]

Cold spray additive manufacturing of Invar 36 alloy: microstructure, thermal expansion and mechanical properties,

C. Chen, Y. Xie, L. Liu, et al., “Cold spray additive manufacturing of Invar 36 alloy: microstructure, thermal expansion and mechanical properties,” J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 72, 39–51 (2021)

2021
[4]

High-strength and impermeable sapphire/aluminum joints fabricated by Ultrafast laser microwelding: Microstructures and joining mechanism,

X. Zuo, L. Lin, Y. Hu, et al., “High-strength and impermeable sapphire/aluminum joints fabricated by Ultrafast laser microwelding: Microstructures and joining mechanism,” Opt. Laser Technol. 180, 111455 (2025)

2025
[5]

Microstructural and properties of Ultrafast laser selective micro-welding joints of sapphire and Invar alloys,

Q. Jiang, J. Xu, J. Yang, et al., “Microstructural and properties of Ultrafast laser selective micro-welding joints of sapphire and Invar alloys,” Transactions of the Li et al. Light: Advanced Manufacturing 27 / 31 China Welding Institution 44(12), 41–48 (2023)

2023
[6]

P., Shetty, R., Schwerdtfeger, C

Khattak, C. P., Shetty, R., Schwerdtfeger, C. R. & Ullal, S. World’s largest sapphire for many applications. J. Cryst. Growth452, 44–48 (2016)

2016
[7]

& Xiu, Z

Xu, Y., Ma, X. & Xiu, Z. Bonding and strengthening mechanism on ultrasonic-assisted soldering of sapphire using Sn-3.5Ag-4Al solder. J. Mater. Process. Technol.288, 116893 (2021)

2021
[8]

& Garay, J

Penilla, E., Devia-Cruz, L., Wieg, A., Martinez-Torres, P., Cuando-Espitia, N., Sellappan, P., Kodera, Y., Aguilar, G. & Garay, J. Ultrafast laser welding of ceramics. Science365(6455), 803–808 (2019)

2019
[9]

Lafon, S.X

R.E. Lafon, S.X. Li, F. Micalizzi, S.W. Lebair, A.L. Glebov, P.O. Leisher, Ultrafast laser bonding of glasses and crystals to metals for epoxy-free optical instruments, Proc. SPIE 11268 (2020)

2020
[10]

et al.Non-destructive measurement of residual stress distribution as a function of depth in sapphire/Ti6Al4V brazing joint via Raman spectra

Li, C. et al.Non-destructive measurement of residual stress distribution as a function of depth in sapphire/Ti6Al4V brazing joint via Raman spectra. Ceram. Int.45, 3284–3289 (2019)

2019
[11]

& Wang, T

Guo, W., Fu, L., Lin, T., He, P., Wang, C. & Wang, T. New design of sapphire joints brazed with bismuth-borate glass. Ceram. Int.45, 5036–5049 (2019)

2019
[12]

He, L., Chen, C., Li, H., Li, Y. & Yi, R. Research advances in joining processes of sapphire. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.121(1–2), 59–81 (2022)

2022
[13]

J. Jin, S. Geng, L. Shu, P. Jiang, X. Shao, C. Han, L. Ren, Y. Li, L. Yang, X. Wang, High-strength and crack-free welding of 2024 aluminium alloy via Zr-core-Al-shell wire, Nat. Commun. 15(1) (2024)

2024
[14]

Z.H. Lai, S. Xu, S.J. Clark, K. Fezzaa, J. Li, Unveiling mechanisms and onset threshold of humping in high-speed laser welding, Nat. Commun. 15(1) (2024) 9546

2024
[15]

H. Shen, Z. Yang, C. Tian, H. Ren, X. Wei, High welding strength of fused silica and stainless steel by picosecond laser with large defocus, Ceram. Int. (2025)

2025
[16]

Zhang, H

L. Zhang, H. Wu, J. Wen, M. Li, X. Shao, X. Ma, Glass to aluminum joining by Li et al. Light: Advanced Manufacturing 28 / 31 forming a mechanical pin structure using femtosecond laser, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 302 (2022)

2022
[17]

Ultrafast Laser Welding of Silicon,

M. Chambonneau, Q. Li, M. Blothe, et al., “Ultrafast Laser Welding of Silicon,” Adv. Photonics Res. 4(5), 2200300 (2023)

2023
[18]

Transmission Laser Welding of Similar and Dissimilar Semiconductor Materials,

P. Sopeña, A. Wang, A. Mouskeftaras, et al., “Transmission Laser Welding of Similar and Dissimilar Semiconductor Materials,” Laser Photonics Rev. 16(11), 2200208 (2022)

2022
[19]

D. Tan, B. Zhang, J. Qiu, Ultrafast laser direct writing in glass: Thermal accumulation engineering and applications, Laser Photon. Rev. 15(9) (2021)

2021
[20]

& Nolte, S

Richter, S., Zimmermann, F., Eberhardt, R., Tünnermann, A. & Nolte, S. Laser welding of glasses at high repetition rates fundamentals and prospects. Opt. Laser Technol.83, 59–66 (2016)

2016
[21]

& Cheng, G

Zhang, G. & Cheng, G. Direct welding of glass and metal by 1 kHz femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Opt.54, 8957–8961 (2015)

2015
[22]

et al.Welding with ultrashort laser pulses: Recent developments at TRUMPF

Zimmermann, F. et al.Welding with ultrashort laser pulses: Recent developments at TRUMPF. Proc. SPIE11673, 69-74(2021)

2021
[23]

X. Jia, J. Luo, K. Li, C. Wang, Z. Li, M. Wang, Z. Jiang, V.P. Veiko, J.A. Duan, Ultrafast laser welding of transparent materials: From principles to applications, Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 7(3) (2025)

2025
[24]

et al.Micro-welding of sapphire and metal by femtosecond laser

Pan, R., Yang, D., Zhou, T. et al.Micro-welding of sapphire and metal by femtosecond laser. Ceram. Int.49(13), 21384–21392 (2023)

2023
[26]

Ultrafast and large-gap microwelding of glass substrates by selective absorption of continuous-wave laser into transiently excited electrons,

S. Yoshitake, Y. Ito, N. Miyamoto, et al., “Ultrafast and large-gap microwelding of glass substrates by selective absorption of continuous-wave laser into transiently excited electrons,” CIRP Ann. 71(1), 157–160 (2022)

2022
[27]

Direct microwelding of dissimilar glass and Kovar alloy without optical contact using femtosecond laser pulses,

C. Ji, Y. Huang, X. Chen, et al., “Direct microwelding of dissimilar glass and Kovar alloy without optical contact using femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Cent. South Li et al. Light: Advanced Manufacturing 29 / 31 Univ. 29(10), 3422–3435 (2022)

2022
[28]

The effect of gap on the quality of glass-to-glass welding using a picosecond laser,

J. Zhang, S. Chen, H. Lu, et al., “The effect of gap on the quality of glass-to-glass welding using a picosecond laser,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 134, 106248 (2020)

2020
[29]

et al.Ultrafast laser direct welding of sapphire and Invar under non-optical contact conditions with white-light-interferometric gap measurement

Li, N. et al.Ultrafast laser direct welding of sapphire and Invar under non-optical contact conditions with white-light-interferometric gap measurement. Opt. Express33(23), 49661–49669 (2025)

2025
[30]

Effects of surface roughness on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar sapphire/Invar36 alloy joints made by ultrashort pulsed laser micro-welding,

M. Yang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhang, et al., “Effects of surface roughness on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar sapphire/Invar36 alloy joints made by ultrashort pulsed laser micro-welding,” J. Laser Appl. 36(3), 032021 (2024)

2024
[31]

Ultrastable bonding of glass with femtosecond laser laser bursts,

F. Zimmermann, S. Richter, S. Döring, et al., “Ultrastable bonding of glass with femtosecond laser laser bursts,” Appl. Opt. 52(6), 1149–1154 (2013)

2013
[32]

X. Li, X. Xu, X. Tang, M. Liu, S. Li, G. Wang, L. Li, Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of femtosecond laser welding of non-optical contact quartz glass and Zr-4, Mater. Lett. 382 (2025)

2025
[33]

Q. Li, G. Matthäus, S. Nolte, Glass to copper direct welding with a rough surface by femtosecond laser pulse bursts, Lasers Manuf Conf. (2021)

2021
[34]

& Graf, T

Hecker, S., Blothe, M., Grossmann, D. & Graf, T. Process regimes during welding of glass by femtosecond laser pulse bursts. Appl. Opt.59(22), 6452–6458 (2020)

2020
[35]

& Shen, H

Ren, H., Tian, C. & Shen, H. Ultrafast laser bursts welding glass and metal with solder paste to create an Ultralarge molten pool. Opt. Lett.49(7), 1717–1720 (2024)

2024
[36]

et al.Direct welding of diamond and glass using burst mode femtosecond pulses, Opt

Chen, W. et al.Direct welding of diamond and glass using burst mode femtosecond pulses, Opt. Express33(12), 26681–26689 (2025)

2025
[37]

et al.Tailoring sapphire–invar welds using burst femtosecond ,laser

Jia, X., Chen, Y., Yi, Z. et al.Tailoring sapphire–invar welds using burst femtosecond ,laser. Light: Advanced Manufacturing7, 1–17 (2026)

2026
[38]

Thickness-profile measurement of transparent thin-film layers by white-light scanning interferometry,

S. Kim and G. Kim, “Thickness-profile measurement of transparent thin-film layers by white-light scanning interferometry,” Appl. Opt. 38(28), 5968–5973 Li et al. Light: Advanced Manufacturing 30 / 31 (1999)

1999
[39]

R., Lytvynov, L

Dobrovinskaya, E. R., Lytvynov, L. A. & Pishchik, V. Sapphire: material, manufacturing, applications. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2009)

2009
[40]

C., Keene, B

Mills, K. C., Keene, B. J., Brooks, R. F. et al.Marangoni effects in welding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.356(1739), 911–925 (1998)

1998
[41]

& Zhang, Y

Liu, T., Wei, H., Wu, J., Lu, J. & Zhang, Y. Modulation of crack formation inside single-crystal sapphire using Ultrafast laser Bessel beams. Opt. Laser Technol.136, 106778 (2021)

2021
[42]

et al.Crystallographic dependence of Ultrafast laser induced crack generation in single-crystal sapphire

Tongwei, L., Haoxing, T., Xin, D. et al.Crystallographic dependence of Ultrafast laser induced crack generation in single-crystal sapphire. Vacuum240, 114528 (2025)

2025
[43]

& Seelig, T

Gross, D. & Seelig, T. Fracture Mechanics with an introduction to micromechanics. (Springer, 2011)

2011
[44]

Coherence scanning interferometry

Su, R. Coherence scanning interferometry. In Advances in Optical Surface Texture Metrology(IOP Publishing, 2020), pp. 2-1–2-27

2020
[45]

J. Huo, Z. Zeng, J. Yuan, M. Luo, A. Luo, J. Li, H. Yang, N. Zhao, Q. Zhang, Welding between rough copper foil and silica glass using green femtosecond laser, Opt. Laser Technol. 181 110054 (2025)

2025
[46]

Zhang, Y

G. Zhang, Y. Pan, P. Wu, Z. Guo, J. Lv, H. Zhang, J. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Xu, L. Wang, G. Cheng, Glass micro welding in thermal accumulation regime with using spatially shaped ultrafast laser, Opt. Laser Technol. 168 (2024)

2024
[47]

Ji, Y.-J

C.-H. Ji, Y.-J. Huang, X. Chen, J.-Y. Jiang, Z.-J. Guo, Y. Long, Direct microwelding of dissimilar glass and Kovar alloy without optical contact using femtosecond laser pulses, J. Cent. South Univ. 29(10) 3422–3435 (2022)

2022
[48]

Li, Q. et al. Direct Glass-to-Metal Welding by Femtosecond Laser Pulse Bursts: II, Enhancing the Weld Between Glass and Polished Metal Surfaces. Nanomaterials 15, 1215 (2025)

2025
[49]

Li, W. et al. Femtosecond laser welding of non-optical-contact ceramic and Li et al. Light: Advanced Manufacturing 31 / 31 fused silica. Opt. Lett. 51, 532 (2026)

2026