pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13222 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 💰 econ.TH · cs.GT

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Extended Scenario Bundle Analysis: A Formal Framework for Strategic Scenario Modeling

Thomas Pitz, Vin\'icius Ferraz

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 01:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.TH cs.GT
keywords scenario bundle analysisstrategic modelingqualitative judgmentinterdependenceattitude vocabularyscenario treemulti-criteria evaluationcrisis analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

An extended Scenario Bundle Analysis framework adds a two-layer architecture and richer attitude vocabulary to model strategic scenarios without full payoffs or probabilities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper refines the original Scenario Bundle Analysis into a formal two-layer system that separates a static scenario database from a dynamic scenario tree. It enriches the model with attitudes such as beliefs, desires, intentions, fears, and coalitional commitments, treating expectations as doxastic states, while adding domain modifiers, a topology on scenario spaces, typed assessment updates, and multi-criteria evaluation. The definitions are precise enough to support computational implementation. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach lets analysts combine qualitative expert judgment with explicit interdependence in crisis situations without demanding complete quantitative data.

Core claim

The paper claims that the original SBA framework can be extended by introducing a two-layer architecture that separates a static scenario database from a dynamic scenario tree system, along with a richer attitude vocabulary including beliefs, desires, intentions, fears, and coalitional commitments (with expectations as doxastic attitudes), a domain/modifier layer for contextual framing, a topology on admissible scenario spaces, typed assessment-state updates, and multi-criteria evaluation, all stated with sufficient mathematical precision to support computational implementation while preserving the ability to combine qualitative judgment and interdependence without fully specified payoffs or

What carries the argument

The two-layer architecture separating a static scenario database from a dynamic scenario tree system, augmented by an extended attitude vocabulary and typed update rules.

If this is right

  • Enables auditable update rules for scenario assessments in strategic crises.
  • Supports multi-criteria evaluation of interdependent scenarios using qualitative inputs.
  • Allows precise mathematical definitions suitable for computational tools.
  • Incorporates coalitional commitments and fears alongside beliefs and desires.
  • Provides a topology for comparing admissible scenario spaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The topology on scenario spaces could support new similarity metrics for comparing strategic options across different crises.
  • Typed updates might integrate directly with automated monitoring systems for real-time attitude tracking.
  • The separation of static and dynamic layers suggests easier maintenance of large scenario databases in practice.
  • This structure could extend to domains like policy planning where full probabilistic models remain unavailable.

Load-bearing premise

The original SBA framework can be extended with these specific mathematical interfaces and attitude layers while preserving its core ability to combine qualitative judgment and interdependence without requiring fully specified payoffs or probabilities.

What would settle it

An implementation of the extended framework that requires full payoff matrices or probability distributions to perform any update or evaluation would falsify the claim that the extensions preserve the original qualitative capabilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13222 by Thomas Pitz, Vin\'icius Ferraz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two-layer architecture of extended SBA: the static database DBSBA generates and initializes the dynamic scenario tree system T; scenario evalua￾tions feed back as state updates. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cross-domain modifiers as constraint regimes on resource, informa￾tion, and capacity conditions. under simultaneous environmental, technological, and humanitarian stres￾sors. • Resource conflict with regime instability: Crisis({Geo, Pol}, {Env}) — a territorial dispute over water or energy re￾sources (Geo) coincides with domestic political instability (Pol), intensified by climate-driven scarcity. Adequate… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Coalition formation as a coordination decision in a scenario tree. z0: Initial state z1 : Coalition forms z2: Coalition dissolves A1 A2 A3 Actors pursue individual aims A1 A2 A3 Coalition X = {A1, A2, A3} Joint action on aligned aims A1 A2 A3 X ′ = {A1, A2} Aims diverge, coalition fragments Shared threat Divergence Event: External threat Event: Threat re￾moved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coalition formation and fragmentation as path-dependent coordina￾tion dynamics. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Attribute structure in SBA. Each attribute type k is an attribute function k : A ∪ C → Dk . Coalition values may be computed by aggregation (Sck , Qk) or assigned directly (emergent attributes). 37 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ordinalization: continuous quantitative inputs (left) are mapped to ordinal levels (right) via defined thresholds. 2.5 Attitudes Attitudes are propositional states that encode how actors and coalitions perceive, evaluate, and motivate action in a scenario. Where attributes describe what entities are, attitudes describe what they believe, desire, fear, expect, and commit to. They therefore provide the cogni… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Taxonomy and logical topology of propositional attitudes. Arrows indicate the mapping of internal coherence axioms onto the assessment state ontology. 42 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Attitude intensity matrix across SBA actors (optional qualification layer). Intensities range from 0 (none) to 5 (very high). 45 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustrative signed and weighted relation network in SBA. Green edges = cooperative ties; red dashed edges = confrontative ties; gray edges = neutral or cross-domain links. 2.6.3 Higher-order relations While most network representations model interactions as dyadic relations be￾tween pairs of actors, many political, economic, and institutional dependencies inherently involve three or more entities. Example… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Two equivalent visualisations of higher-order relations: (a) simplicial (geometric) depiction; (b) bipartite incidence representation suited for database and algorithmic manipulation. 51 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: visualises the multiplex structure across four domains. This prevents scenario initialization from mixing incompatible layer signals (e.g. a strongly confrontative political tie with a fragmented economic dependency). A B C D Political + Alliance – Rivalry A B C D Economic ≡ Strong · · · Weak A B C D Informational → Info flow A B C D Security + Defense – Threat Layer Coherence Example (A & B): Political (… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Three-layer hierarchy of SBA action ontology. The transition from L1 to L3 represents the process of parameter binding, transforming abstract ontological definitions into concrete scenario events. 2.7.3 Illustrative example (type → option → action) Action type: Threat of sanction. αThreatSanction = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Event structure and temporal phases. The model distinguishes between preventive measures (ex ante), the realization of exogenous shocks (in itinere), and subsequent recovery strategies (ex post). 2.8.3 Event Typology The typology presented below serves two complementary purposes within SBA ontology. First, it identifies a set of orthogonal descriptive dimensions that jointly span the space of possible eve… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Event Dependency Graph GE showcasing systemic risk and cascading failures. These parameters enable SBA to represent asymmetric information in crises where rumor, secrecy, or misinformation alter actors’ attitudes without a corre￾sponding event having occurred. (2) Spatial scope. Each event possesses a spatial or domain-specific footprint ϕe ⊆ Loc, indicating the region, sector, or network layer affected. … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Four-actor scenario tree for the backward-induction example. Deci￾sion nodes are labeled by node identifier ni and acting entity Aj . Terminal nodes carry preference vectors [ua1 , ua2 , ua3 , ua4 ]. The subgame-perfect equilibrium path O1 → O2 → ¬O3 is highlighted in red. 2. Node n3 (actor A1): Option O4 leads to z3 with ua1 = 3; option ¬O4 leads to z4 with ua1 = 2. Since 3 > 2, actor A1 selects O4. Cont… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Most Likely Path (MLP) vs. preference-based Most Rational Path (MRP). Normative–descriptive duality. MRP expresses normative choice coherence under a fixed decision rule and strict terminal evaluations, while MLP expresses empirical plausibility under conditional likelihood estimates. Divergence be￾tween MRP and MLP indicates misperception, commitment problems, or escala￾tion pressure produced by the inte… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Assessment-state change versus methodological variation. Fixed signatures, DBt-dependent valuations. Type signatures remain fixed (attribute symbols, attitude operators, relation symbols). Valuations (attribute values, attitudes held, active relations) are those of DBt . Temporal change is represented by moving from (DBt , Tt) to (DBt+1, Tt+1), not by paths inside Tt . Encoding as comparison-relevant proj… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Hierarchical evaluation layers induced by a fixed assessment state DBt and a bundle B. Actor- and coalition-based comparison. For each a ∈ At (or X ∈ Ct), the evaluation induces an order or preorder on S(B). Disagreements across {⪰a} indicate conflict potential; alignments indicate coalition plausibility under the fixed DBt . System-based comparison. System-level criteria induce a partial order ⪯sys on S(… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Dominance graph induced by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p102_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Empirical grounding and validation workflow in SBA. 110 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p110_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strategic crisis analysis needs representations that combine qualitative expert judgement, explicit interdependence, and auditable update rules without requiring fully specified payoffs or probabilities. Scenario Bundle Analysis (SBA), developed by Amos Perlmutter and Reinhard Selten, provides such a starting point, but the original formulation leaves several database, topology, and update interfaces implicit. This paper presents a formal refinement and extension of the original SBA framework, introducing a two-layer architecture that separates a static scenario database from a dynamic scenario tree system. The extended framework incorporates a richer attitude vocabulary: beliefs, desires, intentions, fears, and coalitional commitments, with expectations treated as doxastic attitudes. It also adds a domain/modifier layer for contextual framing, a topology on admissible scenario spaces\index{Scenario space}, typed assessment-state updates, and multi-criteria evaluation. Mathematical definitions are stated with sufficient precision to support computational implementation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to provide a formal refinement and extension of the original Scenario Bundle Analysis (SBA) framework by Perlmutter and Selten. It introduces a two-layer architecture separating a static scenario database from a dynamic scenario tree system, incorporates a richer attitude vocabulary (beliefs, desires, intentions, fears, coalitional commitments, with expectations as doxastic attitudes), adds a domain/modifier layer for contextual framing, a topology on admissible scenario spaces, typed assessment-state updates, and multi-criteria evaluation. The mathematical definitions are stated with precision sufficient to support computational implementation, enabling representations that combine qualitative expert judgment, explicit interdependence, and auditable update rules without requiring fully specified payoffs or probabilities.

Significance. If the mathematical definitions hold with the claimed precision for implementation, this extension would represent a meaningful advance in formal strategic modeling for crisis analysis and economic theory. It directly addresses implicit interfaces in the original SBA regarding databases, topologies, and updates while preserving the core strength of handling qualitative judgment alongside interdependence. The provision of implementation-ready definitions and the expanded attitude vocabulary (including coalitional commitments) are particular strengths that could facilitate reproducible applications in decision support systems.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'a topology on admissible scenario spaces' is introduced without indicating the specific topological structure (e.g., discrete, metric, or order-based); a single clarifying clause would improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the original SBA.
  2. [Throughout] The manuscript contains a LaTeX artifact 'scenario spacesindex{Scenario space}' that should be corrected to ensure clean typesetting in the final version.
  3. [Section 3 or 4] Consider adding one short worked example (perhaps in §3 or §4) showing how a typed assessment-state update operates on a minimal scenario bundle; this would make the claimed computational implementability more concrete without lengthening the paper substantially.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and constructive assessment of our manuscript on the extended Scenario Bundle Analysis framework. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we appreciate the recognition of the framework's potential contributions to formal strategic modeling. Since no specific major comments were raised, we have no point-by-point rebuttals to provide at this stage. We will proceed with minor revisions to improve clarity, notation consistency, and implementation details as appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper is explicitly framed as a formal refinement and extension of the original SBA framework by Perlmutter and Selten (distinct external authors). It introduces new components including a two-layer architecture, richer attitude vocabulary (beliefs, desires, intentions, fears, coalitional commitments), domain/modifier layer, topology on scenario spaces, typed assessment-state updates, and multi-criteria evaluation, with mathematical definitions stated for computational implementation. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central claims rest on independent formalization of interfaces left implicit in the cited prior work rather than on renaming or smuggling in unverified assumptions from the authors' own prior results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the paper relies on standard mathematical structures for topology and typed updates without introducing free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond the extension of the prior SBA framework.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard mathematical definitions suffice for topology on scenario spaces and typed assessment-state updates
    The abstract states that mathematical definitions are provided with sufficient precision for implementation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5445 in / 1241 out tokens · 51071 ms · 2026-05-14T01:12:07.817695+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 137 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024 , url =

    Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    2013 , journal =

    Consensus Problems on Networks with Antagonistic Interactions , author =. 2013 , journal =

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    1957 , publisher =

    Intention , author =. 1957 , publisher =

    work page 1957

  4. [4]

    1951 , publisher =

    Social Choice and Individual Values , author =. 1951 , publisher =

    work page 1951

  5. [5]

    1999 , journal =

    Complexity and the economy , author =. 1999 , journal =

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    1962 , publisher =

    How to Do Things with Words , author =. 1962 , publisher =

    work page 1962

  7. [7]

    1984 , publisher =

    The Evolution of Cooperation , author =. 1984 , publisher =

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    1981 , publisher =

    Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs , author =. 1981 , publisher =

    work page 1981

  9. [9]

    2008 , booktitle =

    The Logic of Public Announcements, Common Knowledge, and Private Suspicions , author =. 2008 , booktitle =

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    1987 , publisher =

    An Architectonic for Science: The Structuralist Program , author =. 1987 , publisher =

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    2020 , journal =

    Networks beyond Pairwise Interactions: Structure and Dynamics of Higher-Order Systems , author =. 2020 , journal =

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    1992 , publisher =

    Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , author =. 1992 , publisher =

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Bellman, Richard , title =

    work page

  14. [14]

    2002 , publisher =

    Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach , author =. 2002 , publisher =

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    2016 , journal =

    Higher-Order Organization of Complex Networks , author =. 2016 , journal =

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    1992 , publisher =

    Social Conflicts and Third Parties: Strategies of Conflict Resolution , author =. 1992 , publisher =

    work page 1992

  17. [17]

    , title =

    Bertsekas, Dimitri P. , title =. 2005 , edition =

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    2014 , journal =

    The Structure and Dynamics of Multilayer Networks , author =. 2014 , journal =

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    1987 , publisher =

    Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason , author =. 1987 , publisher =

    work page 1987

  20. [20]

    2001 , publisher =

    A Course in Metric Geometry , author =. 2001 , publisher =

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    1998 , publisher =

    Security: A New Framework for Analysis , author =. 1998 , publisher =

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    1947 , publisher =

    Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic , author =. 1947 , publisher =

    work page 1947

  23. [23]

    1956 , journal =

    Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider's Theory , author =. 1956 , journal =

    work page 1956

  24. [24]

    1996 , publisher =

    The Rise of the Network Society , author =. 1996 , publisher =

    work page 1996

  25. [25]

    2024 , url =

    BACI Trade Data and Geographical Datasets , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    1988 , publisher =

    The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , author =. 1988 , publisher =

    work page 1988

  27. [27]

    1990 , publisher =

    Foundations of Social Theory , author =. 1990 , publisher =

    work page 1990

  28. [28]

    2024 , url =

    Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    1963 , publisher =

    A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , author =. 1963 , publisher =

    work page 1963

  30. [30]

    1980 , booktitle =

    Actions, Reasons, and Causes , author =. 1980 , booktitle =

    work page 1980

  31. [31]

    1967 , booktitle =

    The Logical Form of Action Sentences , author =. 1967 , booktitle =

    work page 1967

  32. [32]

    2024 , url =

    DesInventar Disaster Information System , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    2010 , publisher =

    Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World , author =. 2010 , publisher =

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    2024 , url =

    ERA5 Global Climate Reanalysis , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    2024 , url =

    The International Disaster Database (EM-DAT) , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    1962 , journal =

    Power-Dependence Relations , author =. 1962 , journal =

    work page 1962

  37. [37]

    1995 , publisher =

    Reasoning About Knowledge , author =. 1995 , publisher =

    work page 1995

  38. [38]

    2024 , url =

    FAOSTAT Statistical Database , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    2004 , publisher =

    SARS, Governance and the Globalization of Disease , author =. 2004 , publisher =

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    2019 , publisher =

    The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design , author =. 2019 , publisher =

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Zeitschrift f

    Frege, Gottlob , year =. Zeitschrift f

    work page

  42. [42]

    2011 , publisher =

    Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics , author =. 2011 , publisher =

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    1998 , publisher =

    The Theory of Learning in Games , author =. 1998 , publisher =

    work page 1998

  44. [44]

    1996 , publisher =

    Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization , author =. 1996 , publisher =

    work page 1996

  45. [45]

    2023 , howpublished =

    Global Database of Events, Language, and Tone , author =. 2023 , howpublished =

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    1989 , publisher =

    On Social Facts , author =. 1989 , publisher =

    work page 1989

  47. [47]

    Journal of Mathematical Economics , year =

    Gilboa, Itzhak and Schmeidler, David , title =. Journal of Mathematical Economics , year =

    work page

  48. [48]

    , title =

    Gillies, Donald B. , title =. Contributions to the Theory of Games. 1959 , publisher =

    work page 1959

  49. [49]

    1993 , journal =

    Stable Coalition Structures with a Unidimensional Set of Alternatives , author =. 1993 , journal =

    work page 1993

  50. [50]

    2012 , publisher =

    International Mediation , author =. 2012 , publisher =

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    2003 , publisher =

    Reasoning about Uncertainty , author =. 2003 , publisher =

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    1955 , journal =

    Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , author =. 1955 , journal =

    work page 1955

  53. [53]

    1946 , journal =

    Attitudes and Cognitive Organization , author =. 1946 , journal =

    work page 1946

  54. [54]

    2013 , journal =

    Globally Networked Risks and How to Respond , author =. 2013 , journal =

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    1999 , publisher =

    Psychology of Intelligence Analysis , author =. 1999 , publisher =

    work page 1999

  56. [56]

    2010 , publisher =

    Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis , author =. 2010 , publisher =

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    1962 , publisher =

    Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions , author =. 1962 , publisher =

    work page 1962

  58. [58]

    1992 , publisher =

    Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems , author =. 1992 , publisher =

    work page 1992

  59. [59]

    1973 , journal =

    Resilience and stability of ecological systems , author =. 1973 , journal =

    work page 1973

  60. [60]

    1999 , publisher =

    Environment, Scarcity, and Violence , author =. 1999 , publisher =

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    2024 , url =

    Integrated Crisis Early Warning System Event Data , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    2024 , url =

    Issue Correlates of War Dataset , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    2024 , url =

    International Financial Statistics , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    1983 , publisher =

    Semantics and Cognition , author =. 1983 , publisher =

    work page 1983

  65. [65]

    2008 , publisher =

    Social and Economic Networks , author =. 2008 , publisher =

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    2007 , publisher =

    Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , author =. 2007 , publisher =

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    1967 , publisher =

    The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years , author =. 1967 , publisher =

    work page 2000

  68. [68]

    2014 , journal =

    Multilayer Networks , author =. 2014 , journal =

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    , title =

    Kreps, David M. , title =

    work page

  70. [70]

    2005 , publisher =

    Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor--Network Theory , author =. 2005 , publisher =

    work page 2005

  71. [71]

    2003 , journal =

    Alliance Reliability in Times of War: Explaining State Decisions to Violate Treaties , author =. 2003 , journal =

    work page 2003

  72. [72]

    2011 , publisher =

    Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents , author =. 2011 , publisher =

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    1984 , journal =

    The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , author =. 1984 , journal =

    work page 1984

  74. [74]

    1995 , publisher =

    Microeconomic Theory , author =. 1995 , publisher =

    work page 1995

  75. [75]

    1995 , journal =

    Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games , author =. 1995 , journal =

    work page 1995

  76. [76]

    1999 , publisher =

    Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science , author =. 1999 , publisher =

    work page 1999

  77. [77]

    1970 , journal =

    Universal Grammar , author =. 1970 , journal =

    work page 1970

  78. [78]

    1994 , publisher =

    Game Theory for Political Scientists , author =. 1994 , publisher =

    work page 1994

  79. [79]

    2010 , publisher =

    Networks: An Introduction , author =. 2010 , publisher =

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    2024 , url =

    NOAA Climate Data Records , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.