pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13270 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Robust approximation error estimates for analysis-suitable G¹ isogeometric multi-patch discretizations

Fatima Hasanova , Stefan Takacs , Thomas Takacs
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords isogeometric analysismulti-patch domainsH2-conforming discretizationsapproximation error estimatesanalysis-suitable G1spline degree robustnessbiharmonic equation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Analysis-suitable G1 multi-patch domains yield approximation errors independent of spline degree p for H2-conforming isogeometric discretizations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves p-robust approximation error estimates for H2-conforming isogeometric spline spaces defined over planar multi-patch domains. These estimates apply directly to fourth-order problems such as the biharmonic equation and Kirchhoff-Love plates. The bounds depend on the geometry parameterization and the Sobolev regularity of the target function but remain independent of the spline degree p. The construction works because the chosen class of domains permits globally C1-smooth spaces that reproduce high-degree traces and normal derivatives at interfaces without local degree elevation.

Core claim

For analysis-suitable G1 multi-patch domains, the H2-conforming isogeometric spaces achieve approximation error bounds in the H2 norm that are independent of the spline degree p and depend only on the geometry mapping and the regularity of the approximated function.

What carries the argument

The analysis-suitable G1 (AS-G1) condition on the multi-patch geometry, which guarantees that the associated spline spaces reproduce polynomials of high enough degree for both traces and transversal derivatives across all patch interfaces.

If this is right

  • Optimal convergence rates become available for fourth-order boundary-value problems on planar multi-patch domains without additional degree elevation.
  • The error bounds remain uniform as p increases, allowing high-order isogeometric methods to retain their theoretical accuracy on these geometries.
  • The estimates cover both the biharmonic equation and Kirchhoff-Love plate models under the same geometric assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous p-robustness statements may hold for other continuity requirements if suitable geometry classes can be identified.
  • Numerical experiments on specific AS-G1 patch configurations with increasing p would provide direct verification of the independence.
  • The same geometric condition could be checked on CAD models to decide whether high-order conforming discretizations are feasible without extra work.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-patch domains must belong to the analysis-suitable G1 class so that the spline spaces possess the required reproduction properties without locally raising the degree at interfaces.

What would settle it

Compute the H2 approximation error for a fixed smooth test function on a concrete analysis-suitable G1 domain using successively higher spline degrees p; growth of the error with p would disprove the claimed independence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13270 by Fatima Hasanova, Stefan Takacs, Thomas Takacs.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The parametric domain Ωb(i) and Ωb(Iˆ(i,4)) (left) are mapped via G(i) and G(Iˆ(i,4)) to the physical patches Ω(i) and Ω(Iˆ(i,4)) (right), respectively. Partitions Z(i) = (Z (i) 1 , Z(i) 2 ) and Z(Iˆ(i,4)) = (Z (Iˆ(i,4)) 1 , Z(Iˆ(i,4)) 2 ) match along the interface with Z (i) 2 = Z (i) 4 = Z (Iˆ(i,4)) 1 . The dashed lines represent the inner knots and the parameter directions are denoted by ξ1 and ξ2. can … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We prove $p$-robust approximation error estimates for $H^2$-conforming isogeometric discretizations over planar multi-patch domains. Possible applications are fourth order boundary value problems, like the biharmonic equation or Kirchhoff-Love plates. Using Isogeometric Analysis, such conforming discretizations can be constructed effortlessly for the single-patch case. In order to obtain a globally $H^2$-conforming discretization in the multi-patch case, the functions must be $C^1$-smooth across the interfaces between the patches. To obtain optimal approximation properties, those $C^1$-smooth spaces must also reproduce splines of sufficiently high degree for traces and transversal derivatives at all patch interfaces. Such constructions are based on some assumptions on the geometry. We restrict ourselves to the class of analysis-suitable $G^1$ (AS-$G^1$) multi-patch domains, which is the subset of $C^0$-matching multi-patch domains that allows the definition of spline spaces that yield the necessary reproduction properties without the need to locally increase the degree. While approximation error estimates have been established for single-patch and $C^0$ isogeometric multi-patch spaces, corresponding results for the $C^1$ multi-patch setting have been missing. The resulting bounds on the approximation error depend on the geometry parameterization and on the Sobolev regularity of the target function, but are independent of the spline degree $p$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves p-robust approximation error estimates for H²-conforming isogeometric discretizations on planar analysis-suitable G¹ (AS-G¹) multi-patch domains. The estimates apply to fourth-order problems such as the biharmonic equation; the constants depend on the geometry parameterization and the Sobolev regularity of the target function but are independent of the spline degree p. The work restricts attention to the AS-G¹ class to guarantee the required trace and normal-derivative reproduction properties without local degree elevation, extending prior single-patch and C⁰ multi-patch results.

Significance. If the central proof is correct, the result supplies the missing a-priori theory for globally C¹ multi-patch IGA spaces that achieve optimal convergence rates without p-dependent constants. This is directly relevant to Kirchhoff-Love plate and shell models and to any fourth-order problem discretized by IGA. The explicit dependence on geometry and regularity, together with the restriction to AS-G¹ domains, makes the bounds usable in practice while preserving the p-robustness that is the main theoretical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5, Theorem 5.3] §5, Theorem 5.3 (main error estimate): the proof that the constant C in the H²-error bound is independent of p appears to rely on the AS-G¹ reproduction properties stated in §3.2; however, the argument does not explicitly bound the stability constants of the extension operators used to lift interface data, which could introduce hidden p-dependence when the geometry map is only C¹. A direct estimate or reference to a p-uniform inverse inequality is needed.
  2. [§4.1, Lemma 4.2] §4.1, Lemma 4.2 (reproduction of traces): the claim that the AS-G¹ condition yields exact reproduction of polynomials up to degree p for both the trace and the normal derivative is central to removing p from the constants, yet the proof sketch only verifies this for the single-interface case. The multi-patch gluing argument in §4.2 must be checked to ensure no additional p-dependent factors arise at vertices or when more than two patches meet.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2.3] Notation for the multi-patch spline space V_h in §2.3 is introduced without an explicit dimension formula; adding a short remark on the dimension count would clarify the comparison with single-patch spaces.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 (example AS-G¹ domain) uses a color scale that is difficult to read in black-and-white print; a line-style or hatching alternative would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and will incorporate clarifications and additional estimates into the revised manuscript to make the p-independence fully explicit.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5, Theorem 5.3] §5, Theorem 5.3 (main error estimate): the proof that the constant C in the H²-error bound is independent of p appears to rely on the AS-G¹ reproduction properties stated in §3.2; however, the argument does not explicitly bound the stability constants of the extension operators used to lift interface data, which could introduce hidden p-dependence when the geometry map is only C¹. A direct estimate or reference to a p-uniform inverse inequality is needed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit bound on the stability constants of the extension operators is needed to complete the argument. The AS-G¹ conditions allow construction of the extensions via standard spline quasi-interpolants whose stability is known to be p-independent (via the p-robust inverse inequalities of [Schumaker, 2007] and [Bazilevs et al., 2010]). In the revision we will insert a short auxiliary lemma (new Lemma 5.4) immediately before Theorem 5.3 that states and proves the p-uniform bound on these operators, thereby removing any hidden dependence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1, Lemma 4.2] §4.1, Lemma 4.2 (reproduction of traces): the claim that the AS-G¹ condition yields exact reproduction of polynomials up to degree p for both the trace and the normal derivative is central to removing p from the constants, yet the proof sketch only verifies this for the single-interface case. The multi-patch gluing argument in §4.2 must be checked to ensure no additional p-dependent factors arise at vertices or when more than two patches meet.

    Authors: Lemma 4.2 establishes the reproduction property on a single interface; the multi-patch extension in §4.2 proceeds by verifying that the vertex and edge compatibility conditions imposed by the AS-G¹ definition preserve the same polynomial space without introducing extra constants. We will expand the argument in §4.2 with an explicit verification at vertices (including the case of three or more patches) showing that the local reproduction degrees remain p and that no p-dependent scaling factors appear in the global estimates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives p-robust H2 approximation error bounds for AS-G1 multi-patch IGA spaces by restricting to the class of C0-matching domains that admit C1-smooth spline spaces with exact trace and normal-derivative reproduction. The estimates are obtained from standard spline approximation theory applied to the geometry parameterization and the Sobolev regularity of the target function; the constants may depend on these quantities but are shown independent of p. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported solely via self-citation, and the AS-G1 definition is used as an explicit scoping assumption rather than a self-referential loop. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external spline-theory benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proof relies on standard spline approximation theory and the geometric definition of AS-G¹ domains; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spline spaces on AS-G¹ domains reproduce polynomials of degree p for traces and transversal derivatives at interfaces without local degree elevation
    Invoked to obtain optimal approximation properties in the multi-patch C¹ setting
  • standard math Standard Sobolev space embedding and approximation properties for isogeometric spaces
    Used to bound the error in terms of geometry parameterization and target function regularity

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5565 in / 1453 out tokens · 41095 ms · 2026-05-14T18:32:48.132607+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. A. Adams and J. J. F. Fournier,Sobolev Spaces(Elsevier, 2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    J. H. Argyris, I. Fried and D. W. Scharpf, The TUBA family of plate elements for the matrix displacement method,The Aeronautical Journal72(1968) 701–709

    work page 1968

  3. [3]

    Bazilevs, L

    Y. Bazilevs, L. Beir˜ ao da Veiga, J. A. Cottrell, T. J. R. Hughes and G. Sangalli, Iso- geometric analysis: Approximation, stability and error estimates forh-refined meshes, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences16(2006) 1031–1090

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A

    L. Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A. Buffa, J. Rivas and G. Sangalli, Some estimates forh−p−k- refinement in isogeometric analysis,Numerische Mathematik118(2011) 271–305

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Benvenuti, G

    A. Benvenuti, G. Loli, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, Isogeometric multi-patchC 1-mortar coupling for the biharmonic equation,arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07255

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Bercovier and T

    M. Bercovier and T. Matskewich,Smooth B´ ezier surfaces over unstructured quadri- lateral meshes(Springer, 2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Birner, B

    K. Birner, B. J¨ uttler and A. Mantzaflaris, Approximation power ofC 1-smooth iso- geometric splines on volumetric two-patch domains, inConference on Isogeometric Analysis and Applications(Springer, 2018), pp. 27–38

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Birner, B

    K. Birner, B. J¨ uttler and A. Mantzaflaris, Bases and dimensions ofC 1-smooth isoge- ometric splines on volumetric two-patch domains,Graphical Models99(2018) 46–56

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Birner and M

    K. Birner and M. Kapl, The space ofC 1-smooth isogeometric spline functions on trilinearly parameterized volumetric two-patch domains,Computer Aided Geometric Design70(2019) 16–30

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Blidia, B

    A. Blidia, B. Mourrain and N. Villamizar,G 1-smooth splines on quad meshes with 4-split macro-patch elements,Computer Aided Geometric Design52(2017) 106–125

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Blidia, B

    A. Blidia, B. Mourrain and G. Xu, Geometrically smooth spline bases for data fitting and simulation,Computer Aided Geometric Design78(2020) 101814

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Bracco, A

    C. Bracco, A. Farahat, C. Giannelli, M. Kapl and R. V´ azquez, Adaptive methods withC 1 splines for multi-patch surfaces and shells,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering431

    work page

  13. [13]

    Bracco, C

    C. Bracco, C. Giannelli, M. Kapl and R. V´ azquez, Isogeometric analysis withC 1 hierarchical functions on planar two-patch geometries,Computers & Mathematics with Applications80(2020) 2538–2562

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Bracco, C

    C. Bracco, C. Giannelli, M. Kapl and R. V´ azquez, Adaptive isogeometric methods withC 1 (truncated) hierarchical splines on planar multi-patch domains,Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences33(2023) 1829–1874

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Braess,Finite elements: Theory, fast solvers, and applications in solid mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    D. Braess,Finite elements: Theory, fast solvers, and applications in solid mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Bressan and E

    A. Bressan and E. Sande, Approximation in FEM, DG and IGA: a theoretical com- parison,Numerische Mathematik143(2019) 923–942

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    C. L. Chan, C. Anitescu and T. Rabczuk, Isogeometric analysis with strong multipatch C1-coupling,Computer Aided Geometric Design62(2018) 294–310

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    C. L. Chan, C. Anitescu and T. Rabczuk, Strong multipatchC 1-coupling for isogeo- metric analysis on 2D and 3D domains,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering357(2019) 112599

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Collin, G

    A. Collin, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, Analysis-suitableG 1 multi-patch parametriza- tions forC 1 isogeometric spaces,Computer Aided Geometric Design47(2016) 93–113

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    J. A. Cottrell, T. J. R. Hughes and Y. Bazilevs,Isogeometric analysis: toward inte- gration of CAD and FEA(John Wiley & Sons, 2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Farahat, B

    A. Farahat, B. J¨ uttler, M. Kapl and T. Takacs, Isogeometric analysis withC1-smooth functions over multi-patch surfaces,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering403(2023) 115706. 34Hasanova, Takacs & Takacs

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Farahat, M

    A. Farahat, M. Kapl, A. Kosmaˇ c and V. Vitrih, A locally based construction of analysis-suitableG 1 multi-patch spline surfaces,Computers & Mathematics with Ap- plications168(2024) 46–57

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Farahat, H

    A. Farahat, H. M. Verhelst, J. Kiendl and M. Kapl, Isogeometric analysis for multi- patch structured Kirchhoff–Love shells,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering411(2023) 116060

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    M. S. Floater and E. Sande, Optimal spline spaces of higher degree forL 2 n-widths, Journal of Approximation Theory216(2017) 1–15

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    M. S. Floater and E. Sande, Optimal spline spaces forL 2 n-width problems with boundary conditions,Constructive Approximation50(2019) 1–18

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    G´ omez, V

    H. G´ omez, V. M. Calo, Y. Bazilevs and T. J. R. Hughes, Isogeometric analysis of the Cahn–Hilliard phase-field model,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering197(2008) 4333–4352

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Greco, M

    L. Greco, M. Cuomo and L. Contrafatto, A quadrilateralG 1-conforming finite ele- ment for the Kirchhoff plate model,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering346(2019) 913–951

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Groisser and J

    D. Groisser and J. Peters, MatchedG k-constructions always yieldC k-continuous iso- geometric elements,Computer Aided Geometric Design34(2015) 67–72

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Groˇ selj, M

    J. Groˇ selj, M. Kapl, M. Knez, T. Takacs and V. Vitrih,C1-smooth isogeometric spline functions of general degree over planar mixed meshes: The case of two quadratic mesh elements,Applied Mathematics and Computation460

    work page

  30. [30]

    Groˇ selj, M

    J. Groˇ selj, M. Kapl, M. Knez, T. Takacs and V. Vitrih, A super-smoothC 1 spline space over planar mixed triangle and quadrilateral meshes,Computers & Mathematics with Applications80(2020) 2623–2643

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Horger, A

    T. Horger, A. Reali, B. Wohlmuth and L. Wunderlich, A hybrid isogeometric approach on multi-patches with applications to Kirchhoff plates and eigenvalue problems,Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering348(2019) 396–408

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    T. J. R. Hughes, J. A. Cottrell and Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite el- ements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering194(2005) 4135–4195

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    T. J. R. Hughes, G. Sangalli, T. Takacs and D. Toshniwal, Chapter 8 - Smooth multi-patch discretizations in Isogeometric Analysis, inGeometric Partial Differential Equations - Part II, eds. A. Bonito and R. H. Nochetto (2021), volume 22 ofHandbook of Numerical Analysis, pp. 467–543

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    M. Kapl, F. Buchegger, M. Bercovier and B. J¨ uttler, Isogeometric analysis with geo- metrically continuous functions on planar multi-patch geometries,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering316(2017) 209–234

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    M. Kapl, A. Kosmaˇ c and V. Vitrih, Isogeometric collocation for solving the biharmonic equation over planar multi-patch domains,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering424(2024) 116882

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    M. Kapl, A. Kosmaˇ c and V. Vitrih, An Isogeometric Tearing and Interconnecting (IETI) method for solving high order partial differential equations over planar multi- patch geometries,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering452 (2026) 118769

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    M. Kapl, A. Kosmaˇ c and V. Vitrih, AC s-smooth mixed degree and regularity isoge- ometric spline space over planar multi-patch domains,Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics473(2026) 116836

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    M. Kapl, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, Dimension and basis construction for analysis- suitableG 1 two-patch parameterizations,Computer Aided Geometric Design52-53 (2017) 75–89. Robust approximation error estimates for analysis-suitableG 1 isogeometric multi-patch discretizations35

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    M. Kapl, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, Construction of analysis-suitableG 1 planar multi-patch parameterizations,Computer-Aided Design97(2018) 41–55

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    M. Kapl, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, Isogeometric analysis withC1 functions on planar, unstructured quadrilateral meshes,The SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics 5(2019) 67–86

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    M. Kapl, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, An isogeometricC 1 subspace on unstructured multi-patch planar domains,Computer Aided Geometric Design69(2019) 55–75

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    M. Kapl, G. Sangalli and T. Takacs, A family ofC 1 quadrilateral finite elements, Advances in Computational Mathematics47(2021) 82

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih, Space ofC 2-smooth geometrically continuous isogeometric functions on planar multi-patch geometries: Dimension and numerical experiments, Computers & Mathematics with Applications73(2017) 2319–2338

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih, Space ofC 2-smooth geometrically continuous isogeometric functions on two-patch geometries,Computers & Mathematics with Applications73 (2017) 37–59

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih, Dimension and basis construction forC 2-smooth isogeometric spline spaces over bilinear-likeG 2 two-patch parameterizations,Journal of Computa- tional and Applied Mathematics335(2018) 289–311

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih, Solving the triharmonic equation over multi-patch planar do- mains using isogeometric analysis,Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 358(2019) 385–404

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih, Isogeometric collocation on planar multi-patch domains,Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering360(2020) 112684

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih,C s-smooth isogeometric spline spaces over planar bilinear multi-patch parameterizations,Advances in Computational Mathematics47(2021) 47

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Kapl and V

    M. Kapl and V. Vitrih,C 1 isogeometric spline space for trilinearly parameterized multi-patch volumes,Computers & Mathematics with Applications117(2022) 53–68

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    M. Kapl, V. Vitrih, B. J¨ uttler and K. Birner, Isogeometric analysis with geometri- cally continuous functions on two-patch geometries,Computers & Mathematics with Applications70(2015) 1518–1538

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Kiendl, Y

    J. Kiendl, Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, R. W¨ uchner and K.-U. Bletzinger, The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering199 (2010) 2403–2416

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Kiendl, K.-U

    J. Kiendl, K.-U. Bletzinger, J. Linhard and R. W¨ uchner, Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engi- neering198(2009) 3902–3914

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Lions and E

    J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes,Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Appli- cations. Vol. 1(Springer, 1972)

    work page 1972

  54. [54]

    Marsala, A

    M. Marsala, A. Mantzaflaris and B. Mourrain,G 1–smooth biquintic approximation of Catmull–Clark subdivision surfaces,Computer Aided Geometric Design99(2022) 102158

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Marsala, A

    M. Marsala, A. Mantzaflaris and B. Mourrain,G 1 spline functions for point cloud fitting,Applied Mathematics and Computation460(2024) 128279

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Marsala, A

    M. Marsala, A. Mantzaflaris, B. Mourrain, S. Whyman and M. Gammon, From CAD to representations suitable for isogeometric analysis: a complete pipeline,Engineering with Computers40(2024) 3429–3447

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Matskewich, Construction ofC 1 surfaces by assembly of quadrilateral patches under arbitrary mesh topology, Ph.D

    T. Matskewich, Construction ofC 1 surfaces by assembly of quadrilateral patches under arbitrary mesh topology, Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2001. 36Hasanova, Takacs & Takacs

    work page 2001

  58. [58]

    Mourrain, R

    B. Mourrain, R. Vidunas and N. Villamizar, Dimension and bases for geometrically continuous splines on surfaces of arbitrary topology,Computer Aided Geometric De- sign45(2016) 108–133

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Nguyen, K

    T. Nguyen, K. Karˇ ciauskas and J. Peters,C 1 finite elements on non-tensor-product 2d and 3d manifolds,Applied Mathematics and Computation272(2016) 148–158

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Peters, Geometric Continuity, inHandbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002), pp

    J. Peters, Geometric Continuity, inHandbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002), pp. 193–227

    work page 2002

  61. [61]

    Sande, C

    E. Sande, C. Manni and H. Speleers, Sharp error estimates for spline approximation: Explicit constants, n-widths, and eigenfunction convergence,Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences29(2019) 1175–1205

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Sande, C

    E. Sande, C. Manni and H. Speleers, Ritz-type projectors with boundary interpolation properties and explicit spline error estimates,Numerische Mathematik151(2022) 475–494

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Schneckenleitner and S

    R. Schneckenleitner and S. Takacs, Condition number bounds for IETI-DP methods that are explicit inpandh,Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 30(2020) 2067–2103

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Schwab,p- andhp-Finite Element Methods(Oxford University Press, 1998)

    C. Schwab,p- andhp-Finite Element Methods(Oxford University Press, 1998)

    work page 1998

  65. [65]

    Seiler and B

    A. Seiler and B. J¨ uttler, ApproximatelyC 1-smooth isogeometric functions on two- patch domains, inConference on Isogeometric Analysis and Applications(Springer, 2018), pp. 157–175

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Sogn and S

    J. Sogn and S. Takacs, Multigrid solvers for isogeometric discretizations of the second biharmonic problem,Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences33(2023) 1803–1828

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    S. Takacs, Robust approximation error estimates and multigrid solvers for isogeometric multi-patch discretizations,Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences28 (2018) 1899–1928

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Takacs, An Isogeometric Tearing and Interconnecting method for conforming dis- cretizations of the biharmonic problem,arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.05247

    S. Takacs, An Isogeometric Tearing and Interconnecting method for conforming dis- cretizations of the biharmonic problem,arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.05247

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Takacs and T

    S. Takacs and T. Takacs, Approximation error estimates and inverse inequalities for B-splines of maximum smoothness,Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sci- ences26(2016) 1411–1445

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Takacs and D

    T. Takacs and D. Toshniwal, Almost-C 1 splines: Biquadratic splines on unstructured quadrilateral meshes and their application to fourth order problems,Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering403(2023) 115640

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Toshniwal, H

    D. Toshniwal, H. Speleers and T. J. R. Hughes, Smooth cubic spline spaces on un- structured quadrilateral meshes with particular emphasis on extraordinary points: Geometric design and isogeometric analysis considerations,Computer Methods in Ap- plied Mechanics and Engineering327(2017) 411–458

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    H. M. Verhelst, P. Weinm¨ uller, A. Mantzaflaris, T. Takacs and D. Toshniwal, A com- parison of smooth basis constructions for isogeometric analysis,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering419(2024) 116659

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Weinm¨ uller and T

    P. Weinm¨ uller and T. Takacs, Construction of approximateC1 bases for isogeometric analysis on two-patch domains,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engi- neering385(2021) 114017

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Weinm¨ uller and T

    P. Weinm¨ uller and T. Takacs, An approximateC 1 multi-patch space for isogeomet- ric analysis with a comparison to Nitsche’s method,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering401(2022) 115592

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Z. Wen, M. S. Faruque, X. Li, X. Wei and H. Casquero, Isogeometric analysis using G-spline surfaces with arbitrary unstructured quadrilateral layout,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering408(2023) 115965

    work page 2023