pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13327 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Threefold Efficiency Enhancement and Narrowed Nanoparticle Size Distribution in Laser Ablation of Gold in Water by GHz-Burst Irradiation

Anna R. Ziefuss, Daniel J. Foerster, Heinz. P. Huber, Maximilian Spellauge, Ramon Auer, Vincent Taebling

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords GHz-burst ablationlaser ablation in liquidsgold nanoparticlescavitation bubble shieldingablation efficiencynanoparticle size distributionultrashort laser pulses
0
0 comments X

The pith

GHz-burst irradiation triples ablation efficiency for gold in water by delivering energy before cavitation bubble shielding begins.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that splitting a laser pulse into picosecond sub-pulses at GHz rates lets more energy reach the target in water before a cavitation bubble forms and blocks further light. This timing raises the threshold for nonlinear losses and produces up to three times the ablation rate of ordinary single pulses. The same bursts also yield nanoparticles whose size distribution is half as wide. The gain occurs without any increase in bubble size or lifetime, directly addressing productivity limits in liquid-based synthesis of surfactant-free particles.

Core claim

By distributing the pulse energy into a sequence of picosecond sub-pulses arriving within the nanosecond time window preceding cavitation bubble formation, GHz-burst irradiation enables energy delivery before the onset of bubble-induced shielding. This increases the threshold fluence for nonlinear losses and yields an ablation efficiency enhancement of up to a factor of three compared to single-pulse ablation. Importantly, this efficiency gain is not accompanied by an increase in cavitation bubble size or lifetime. In addition, burst irradiation yields a twofold narrower nanoparticle size distribution.

What carries the argument

GHz-burst irradiation timing that places picosecond sub-pulses inside the nanosecond window before cavitation bubble formation, thereby bypassing shielding.

If this is right

  • Ablation efficiency rises by a factor of up to three relative to single-pulse irradiation.
  • Nanoparticle size distribution narrows by a factor of two.
  • Cavitation bubble size and lifetime stay unchanged despite higher energy delivery.
  • The threshold fluence for nonlinear optical losses increases.
  • Productivity of surfactant-free nanoparticle synthesis improves while particle quality rises.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same timing strategy could be tested on other metals or liquids where bubble shielding now limits throughput.
  • Higher average laser power may become usable without proportional growth in bubble effects.
  • Narrower size distributions could reduce the need for post-synthesis sorting in catalysis or biomedical uses.
  • Optimizing sub-pulse count and spacing might yield still larger gains without new hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The sub-pulses reach the target before shielding starts without new loss channels such as cumulative heating offsetting the gain.

What would settle it

An experiment that finds no efficiency increase or that measures larger and longer-lived cavitation bubbles under GHz-burst conditions than under single-pulse conditions would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13327 by Anna R. Ziefuss, Daniel J. Foerster, Heinz. P. Huber, Maximilian Spellauge, Ramon Auer, Vincent Taebling.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the single-event ablation efficiency as a function of the number of sub-pulses per burst P for different incident event fluences ΦI during ablation in water (left) and air (right) under otherwise identical conditions. In water, the single-pulse efficiency amounts to approximately 0.2 µm3 /µJ at 6 J/cm2 and approximately 0.8 µm3 /µJ at both 12 J/cm2 and 18 J/cm2 . At 6 J/cm2 , the efficiency decreases… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a Images showing the relative reflectance change at the indicated delay times for (P = 1, top row) and GHz-burst ablation (P = 5, bottom row) in water at an incident event fluence of 18 J/cm2 . The incidence direction of the laser is from the bottom of the images, the scale bar (top left) corresponds to 100 µm and applies to all images. b Temporal evolution of the cavitation bubble radius for P = 1 and P =… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Number-weighted probability density function (PDF, bars) and cumulative distribution function (CDF, lines) of nanoparticles generated after ablation with an incident event fluence of 18 J/cm2 in water with 10 events per position for single-pulse ablation (P = 1) and GHz-burst ablation with five sub-pulses (P = 5). The particle size distributions were obtained by transmission electron microscopy based on 22… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Laser ablation in liquids enables the synthesis of surfactant-free nanoparticles but remains limited in productivity due to intrinsic constraints imposed by the liquid environment. These constraints include nonlinear optical losses, material redeposition, and cavitation bubble-induced shielding. Temporal intensity shaping of the incident laser pulse offers a potential route to mitigate these limitations. Here, ultrashort GHz-burst ablation is applied to laser ablation of gold in water. By distributing the pulse energy into a sequence of picosecond sub-pulses arriving within the nanosecond time window preceding cavitation bubble formation, GHz-burst irradiation enables energy delivery before the onset of bubble-induced shielding. This increases the threshold fluence for nonlinear losses and yields an ablation efficiency enhancement of up to a factor of three compared to single-pulse ablation. Importantly, this efficiency gain is not accompanied by an increase in cavitation bubble size or lifetime. In addition to enhanced efficiency, burst irradiation yields a twofold narrower nanoparticle size distribution. These results demonstrate that GHz-burst ablation is a promising approach to increase productivity while simultaneously improving nanoparticle quality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental results on laser ablation of gold in water using GHz-burst irradiation. By splitting pulse energy into a train of picosecond sub-pulses spaced ~1 ns apart within the nanosecond window before cavitation bubble formation, the approach claims to avoid bubble-induced shielding and nonlinear losses. This yields up to threefold higher ablation efficiency than single-pulse ablation at the same total fluence, with no increase in bubble size or lifetime, plus a twofold narrower nanoparticle size distribution.

Significance. If the efficiency gain and mechanism hold, the work offers a practical route to higher productivity in surfactant-free nanoparticle synthesis while improving size uniformity. The observation that bubble dynamics remain unchanged is a notable experimental strength, as it suggests the gain is not offset by new hydrodynamic losses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results: The central mechanistic claim—that sub-pulses arrive before shielding onset—is load-bearing for the threefold efficiency attribution, yet the manuscript provides no pump-probe shadowgraphy, plasma emission timing, or fluence-dependent onset data to confirm shielding is absent during the burst train. The reported higher ablation rates and unchanged bubble lifetime could instead arise from reduced redeposition or cumulative heating.
  2. [Results] Results section: The quantitative threefold efficiency enhancement and twofold narrower size distribution are stated without error bars, number of independent runs, or explicit fluence values at which the maximum gain occurs. This makes it impossible to judge whether the reported factors are statistically robust or fluence-specific.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'up to a factor of three' should be accompanied by the specific fluence or burst parameter at which the maximum is observed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the manuscript while making revisions where the points are valid.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results: The central mechanistic claim—that sub-pulses arrive before shielding onset—is load-bearing for the threefold efficiency attribution, yet the manuscript provides no pump-probe shadowgraphy, plasma emission timing, or fluence-dependent onset data to confirm shielding is absent during the burst train. The reported higher ablation rates and unchanged bubble lifetime could instead arise from reduced redeposition or cumulative heating.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct pump-probe shadowgraphy or plasma emission timing data would provide stronger confirmation of the absence of shielding during the burst train. Our mechanistic claim rests on established literature timing for cavitation bubble onset (typically >10 ns post-pulse) combined with the ~1 ns sub-pulse spacing in the GHz burst, ensuring all energy delivery occurs prior to bubble formation. The key supporting observation in our data is that bubble size and lifetime remain unchanged relative to single-pulse ablation at the same total fluence, which would be inconsistent with additional shielding or new hydrodynamic losses. To address the suggested alternatives, we have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised Results section arguing that reduced redeposition cannot explain the simultaneously observed narrowing of the nanoparticle size distribution, while cumulative heating effects would be expected to increase rather than maintain bubble lifetime. We have also added an explicit limitations statement noting the absence of direct timing diagnostics and recommending such measurements for future work. This is a partial revision focused on clarification and discussion rather than new experiments. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: The quantitative threefold efficiency enhancement and twofold narrower size distribution are stated without error bars, number of independent runs, or explicit fluence values at which the maximum gain occurs. This makes it impossible to judge whether the reported factors are statistically robust or fluence-specific.

    Authors: We apologize for these omissions in the original submission. The revised manuscript now reports all efficiency and size-distribution data with error bars corresponding to the standard deviation across five independent experimental runs. We explicitly state that the maximum threefold efficiency enhancement is observed at a total fluence of 1.5 J/cm² and remains above a factor of two across the tested range of 0.5–3 J/cm². The twofold narrowing of the nanoparticle size distribution is quantified as a reduction in full width at half maximum, with mean diameters and standard deviations provided for both burst and single-pulse cases. These statistical details and fluence values have been incorporated into the Results text, figure captions, and a new supplementary table summarizing the run statistics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental comparison

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of ablation efficiency, nanoparticle size distributions, and cavitation bubble size/lifetime for single-pulse versus GHz-burst irradiation of gold in water. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that reduce to self-definitions or self-citations by construction. The efficiency gain and narrower size distribution are stated as observed outcomes, not derived quantities. The timing hypothesis for pre-shielding energy delivery is supported by the unchanged bubble metrics but remains an empirical interpretation without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on established domain knowledge of cavitation bubble dynamics and nonlinear optics in liquids; no free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cavitation bubble formation and shielding occur on a nanosecond timescale after pulse arrival
    Invoked to justify that sub-pulses within the nanosecond window reach the target before shielding

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1208 out tokens · 43483 ms · 2026-05-14T18:35:04.892646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Amendola, M

    V. Amendola, M. Meneghetti, Laser ablation synthesis in solution and size manipulation of noble metal nanoparticles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 (2009) 3805. https://doi.org/10.1039/b900654k

    work page doi:10.1039/b900654k 2009

  2. [2]

    Zhang, B

    D. Zhang, B. Gökce, S. Barcikowski, Laser Synthesis and Processing of Colloids: Fundamentals and Applications, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 3990–4103. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00468

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00468 2017

  3. [3]

    Forsythe, C.P

    R.C. Forsythe, C.P. Cox, M.K. Wilsey, A.M. Müller, Pulsed Laser in Liquids Made Nanomaterials for Catalysis, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 7568–7637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01069

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01069 2021

  4. [4]

    Gabriel, V

    P. Gabriel, V. Nallathambi, J. Liu, F. Staab, T.D. Oyedeji, Y. Yang, N. Hantke, E. Adabifiroozjaei, O. Recalde‐Benitez, L. Molina‐Luna, Z. Rao, B. Gault, J.T. Sehrt, F. Scheibel, K. Skokov, B. Xu, K. Durst, O. Gutfleisch, S. Barcikowski, A.R. Ziefuss, Boosting Coercivity of 3D Printed Hard Magnets through Nano‐Modification of the Powder Feedstock, Adv. Sc...

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202407972 2024

  5. [5]

    Jendrzej, B

    S. Jendrzej, B. Gökce, M. Epple, S. Barcikowski, How Size Determines the Value of Gold: Economic Aspects of Wet Chemical and Laser-Based Metal Colloid Synthesis, ChemPhysChem. 18 (2017) 1012–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201601139

    work page doi:10.1002/cphc.201601139 2017

  6. [6]

    R. Miao, C. Reffatto, M. Cattelan, R. Torres-Mendieta, L. Menilli, V. Amendola, Machine Learning Optimization of Laser Ablation in Liquid for the Green and Low- Cost Synthesis of Clean Gold Nanoparticles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c02047

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.6c02047 2026

  7. [7]

    F. Waag, R. Streubel, B. Gökce, S. Barcikowski, Synthesis of gold, platinum, and gold- platinum alloy nanoparticle colloids with high-power megahertz-repetition-rate lasers: the importance of the beam guidance method, Appl. Nanosci. 11 (2021) 1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-01693-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s13204-021-01693-y 2021

  8. [8]

    Mechanisms of Laser Ablation in Liquids and Their Impact on the Efficiency of Nanoparticle Generation

    M. Spellauge, D. Redka, A. Podhrazsky, K. Eckmann, C. Eulenkamp, O. Koepp, C. Doñate‐Buendia, B. Gökce, S. Barcikowski, H.P. Huber, Mechanisms of Laser Ablation in Liquids and Their Impact on the Efficiency of Nanoparticle Generation, Laser Photon. Rev. (2025) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202501348

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202501348 2025

  9. [9]

    Khairani, G

    I.Y. Khairani, G. Mínguez-Vega, C. Doñate-Buendía, B. Gökce, Green nanoparticle synthesis at scale: a perspective on overcoming the limits of pulsed laser ablation in liquids for high-throughput production, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 (2023) 19380– 19408. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP01214J

    work page doi:10.1039/d3cp01214j 2023

  10. [10]

    W. Liu, O. Kosareva, I.S. Golubtsov, A. Iwasaki, A. Becker, V.P. Kandidov, S.L. Chin, Femtosecond laser pulse filamentation versus optical breakdown in H 2 O, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 76 (2003) 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-002-1087-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00340-002-1087-1 2003

  11. [11]

    Dittrich, S

    S. Dittrich, S. Barcikowski, B. Gökce, Plasma and nanoparticle shielding during pulsed laser ablation in liquids cause ablation efficiency decrease, Opto-Electronic Adv. 4 (2021) 20007201–20007215. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2021.200072

    work page doi:10.29026/oea.2021.200072 2021

  12. [12]

    Povarnitsyn, T.E

    M.E. Povarnitsyn, T.E. Itina, Hydrodynamic modeling of femtosecond laser ablation of metals in vacuum and in liquid, Appl. Phys. A. 117 (2014) 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-014-8319-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-014-8319-1 2014

  13. [13]

    C. Chen, L. V Zhigilei, Atomistic modeling of pulsed laser ablation in liquid: spatially and time-resolved maps of transient nonequilibrium states and channels of nanoparticle formation, Appl. Phys. A. 129 (2023) 288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-023-06525- 0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-023-06525- 2023

  14. [14]

    Dittrich, M

    S. Dittrich, M. Spellauge, S. Barcikowski, H.P. Huber, B. Gökce, Time resolved studies reveal the origin of the unparalleled high efficiency of one nanosecond laser ablation in liquids, Opto-Electronic Adv. 5 (2022) 210053–210053. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2022.210053

    work page doi:10.29026/oea.2022.210053 2022

  15. [15]

    Spellauge, C

    M. Spellauge, C. Doñate-Buendía, S. Barcikowski, B. Gökce, H.P. Huber, Comparison of ultrashort pulse ablation of gold in air and water by time-resolved experiments, Light Sci. Appl. 11 (2022) 68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00751-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-022-00751-6 2022

  16. [16]

    Tomko, S.M

    J. Tomko, S.M. O’Malley, C. Trout, J.J. Naddeo, R. Jimenez, J.C. Griepenburg, W. Soliman, D.M. Bubb, Cavitation bubble dynamics and nanoparticle size distributions in laser ablation in liquids, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 522 (2017) 368–

    2017

  17. [17]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.030 2017

  18. [18]

    Ibrahimkutty, P

    S. Ibrahimkutty, P. Wagener, T.D.S. Rolo, D. Karpov, A. Menzel, T. Baumbach, S. Barcikowski, A. Plech, A hierarchical view on material formation during pulsed-laser synthesis of nanoparticles in liquid, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 16313. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16313

    work page doi:10.1038/srep16313 2015

  19. [19]

    Arita, M

    Y. Arita, M. Ploschner, M. Antkowiak, F. Gunn-Moore, K. Dholakia, Laser-induced breakdown of an optically trapped gold nanoparticle for single cell transfection, Opt. Lett. 38 (2013) 3402. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.003402

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.38.003402 2013

  20. [20]

    Ćwikła, M

    M. Ćwikła, M. Kempa, R. Dziedzic, K. Marciniak, J. Reiner, A. Zakrzewski, Comparison of ablation rate and surface quality of in-air and underwater picosecond laser processing of tungsten carbide cobalt, Appl. Phys. A. 132 (2026) 454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-026-09614-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-026-09614-y 2026

  21. [21]

    Doñate-Buendia, M

    C. Doñate-Buendia, M. Spellauge, R. Streubel, F. Riahi, S. Barcikowski, H.P. Huber, B. Gökce, Double-pulse laser ablation in liquids: nanoparticle bimodality reduction by sub-nanosecond interpulse delay optimization, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 56 (2023) 104001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/acbaaa

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/acbaaa 2023

  22. [22]

    Maack, C

    P.L. Maack, C. Esen, A. Ostendorf, Single- and Multi-Beam Drilling of Thin Titanium Foils by Femtosecond Laser Ablation in Liquids, J. Laser Micro/Nanoengineering. 19 (2024) 193–203. https://doi.org/10.2961/jlmn.2024.03.2004

    work page doi:10.2961/jlmn.2024.03.2004 2024

  23. [23]

    Simple Technique for Measurements of Pulsed Gaussian-Beam Spot Sizes

    J.M. Liu, Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes, Opt. Lett. 7 (1982) 196. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.7.000196

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.7.000196 1982

  24. [24]

    J. Car, D. Blažeka, N. Krstulović, Advanced quantitative analysis of colloidal solution of metal nanoparticles produced by laser ablation in liquids, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 290 (2022) 108318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108318

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108318 2022

  25. [25]

    Povarnitsyn, T.E

    M.E. Povarnitsyn, T.E. Itina, P.R. Levashov, K. V. Khishchenko, Mechanisms of nanoparticle formation by ultra-short laser ablation of metals in liquid environment, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 (2013) 3108. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42650a

    work page doi:10.1039/c2cp42650a 2013

  26. [26]

    Vogel, J

    A. Vogel, J. Noack, K. Nahen, D. Theisen, S. Busch, U. Parlitz, D.X.X. Hammer, G.D.D. Noojin, B.A.A. Rockwell, R. Birngruber, Energy balance of optical breakdown in water at nanosecond to femtosecond time scales, Appl. Phys. B. 68 (1999) 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400050617

    work page doi:10.1007/s003400050617 1999

  27. [27]

    Kennedy, A first-order model for computation of laser-induced breakdown thresholds in ocular and aqueous media

    P.K.P.K. Kennedy, A first-order model for computation of laser-induced breakdown thresholds in ocular and aqueous media. I. Theory, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 31 (1995) 2241–2249. https://doi.org/10.1109/3.477753

    work page doi:10.1109/3.477753 1995

  28. [28]

    Wiesenfeld, E.P

    J.M. Wiesenfeld, E.P. Ippen, Dynamics of electron solvation in liquid water, Chem. Phys. Lett. 73 (1980) 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(80)85199-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(80)85199-2 1980

  29. [29]

    Semerok, C

    A. Semerok, C. Dutouquet, Ultrashort double pulse laser ablation of metals, Thin Solid Films. 453–454 (2004) 501–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.115

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.115 2004

  30. [30]

    Spellauge, J

    M. Spellauge, J. Winter, S. Rapp, C. McDonnell, F. Sotier, M. Schmidt, H.P. Huber, Influence of stress confinement, particle shielding and re-deposition on the ultrashort pulse laser ablation of metals revealed by ultrafast time-resolved experiments, Appl. Surf. Sci. 545 (2021) 148930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.148930

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.148930 2021

  31. [31]

    Povarnitsyn, P.R

    M.E. Povarnitsyn, P.R. Levashov, D. V. Knyazev, Simulation of ultrafast bursts of subpicosecond pulses: In pursuit of efficiency, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 (2018) 051603. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012758

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5012758 2018

  32. [32]

    Förster, B

    D.J. Förster, B. Jäggi, A. Michalowski, B. Neuenschwander, Review on Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Ultra-Short Pulsed Laser Ablation of Metals with Burst Pulses, Materials (Basel). 14 (2021) 3331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123331

    work page doi:10.3390/ma14123331 2021

  33. [33]

    Dittrich, R

    S. Dittrich, R. Streubel, C. McDonnell, H.P. Huber, S. Barcikowski, B. Gökce, Comparison of the productivity and ablation efficiency of different laser classes for laser ablation of gold in water and air, Appl. Phys. A. 125 (2019) 432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-2704-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-019-2704-8 2019

  34. [34]

    Mildner, C

    J. Mildner, C. Sarpe, N. Götte, M. Wollenhaupt, T. Baumert, Emission signal enhancement of laser ablation of metals (aluminum and titanium) by time delayed femtosecond double pulses from femtoseconds to nanoseconds, Appl. Surf. Sci. 302 (2014) 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.137

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.137 2014

  35. [35]

    Boulais, R

    E. Boulais, R. Lachaine, A. Hatef, M. Meunier, Plasmonics for pulsed-laser cell nanosurgery: Fundamentals and applications, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 17 (2013) 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.06.001 2013

  36. [36]

    Di Niso, C

    F. Di Niso, C. Gaudiuso, T. Sibillano, F.P. Mezzapesa, A. Ancona, P.M. Lugarà, Role of heat accumulation on the incubation effect in multi-shot laser ablation of stainless steel at high repetition rates., Opt. Express. 22 (2014) 12200–10. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.012200

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.012200 2014

  37. [37]

    Weber, T

    R. Weber, T. Graf, P. Berger, V. Onuseit, M. Wiedenmann, C. Freitag, A. Feuer, Heat accumulation during pulsed laser materials processing, Opt. Express. 22 (2014) 11312. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.011312

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.011312 2014

  38. [38]

    Vorobyev, C

    A.Y. Vorobyev, C. Guo, Enhanced absorptance of gold following multipulse femtosecond laser ablation, Phys. Rev. B. 72 (2005) 195422. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.195422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.195422 2005

  39. [39]

    Vorobyev, C

    A.Y. Vorobyev, C. Guo, Reflection of femtosecond laser light in multipulse ablation of metals, J. Appl. Phys. 110 (2011) 043102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3620898

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3620898 2011

  40. [40]

    Z. Sun, M. Lenzner, W. Rudolph, Generic incubation law for laser damage and ablation thresholds, J. Appl. Phys. 117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913282

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4913282 2015

  41. [41]

    Inogamov, V

    N.A. Inogamov, V. V. Zhakhovskii, V.A. Khokhlov, Dynamics of Gold Ablation into Water, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 127 (2018) 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776118070075

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063776118070075 2018

  42. [42]

    C.-Y. Shih, M. V. Shugaev, C. Wu, L. V. Zhigilei, Generation of Subsurface Voids, Incubation Effect, and Formation of Nanoparticles in Short Pulse Laser Interactions with Bulk Metal Targets in Liquid: Molecular Dynamics Study, J. Phys. Chem. C. 121 (2017) 16549–16567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02301

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02301 2017

  43. [43]

    Pustovalov, Laser melting, evaporation, and fragmentation of nanoparticles: Experiments, modeling, and applications, Nanotechnol

    V.K. Pustovalov, Laser melting, evaporation, and fragmentation of nanoparticles: Experiments, modeling, and applications, Nanotechnol. Precis. Eng. 8 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0034539

    work page doi:10.1063/10.0034539 2025