pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13483 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

Vectorial field reconstruction without detecting the field

Jonas Vasikonis , Sebastian T\"opfer , Satyajeet Patil , Jorge Fuenzalida , Markus Gr\"afe
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords vector beamsinduced coherencenonlinear interferometerquantum holographypolarization reconstructionundetected lightphoton pairsstructured light optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The full vectorial structure of an undetected beam can be recovered by measuring interference in its detected partner photon field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how to reconstruct the spatially varying polarization of a vector beam that is never directly detected. It uses a nonlinear interferometer where an idler photon at telecom wavelength acquires polarization information but remains undetected. Instead, momentum correlations and induced coherence allow this information to appear in interference patterns of the visible signal photon. By applying phase-shifting and off-axis holography with two polarization projections, the horizontal and vertical field amplitudes and their relative phase are extracted across the beam profile. This approach enables characterization of vector fields in spectral regions lacking suitable detectors.

Core claim

In a nonlinear interferometer exploiting induced coherence, indistinguishability between down-conversion pathways transfers the local polarization transformation of an undetected telecom idler field to single-photon interference in the visible signal field, enabled by photon-pair momentum correlations. Phase-shifting and off-axis quantum holography performed on two polarization projections of the signal allow reconstruction of the horizontal and vertical amplitudes together with their relative phase, thereby recovering the complete vectorial structure of the undetected field. Experimental demonstration retrieves the polarization texture of an m=2 vector beam using both multi-shot and single-

What carries the argument

Induced coherence in a nonlinear interferometer, where pathway indistinguishability combined with momentum correlations of photon pairs transfers polarization information from the undetected idler to the detected signal.

If this is right

  • The polarization texture of an m=2 vector beam is experimentally retrieved.
  • Multi-shot and single-shot reconstruction strategies are compared and shown to work.
  • Imaging with undetected light is extended from scalar to vectorial optical fields.
  • Polarization-sensitive sensing becomes possible in spectral regions difficult to access directly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could be adapted for vectorial imaging in the mid-infrared or other bands where direct detection is challenging.
  • Potential applications include quantum state tomography of structured light in inaccessible wavelengths.
  • The approach may extend to reconstructing other properties like orbital angular momentum in undetected fields.

Load-bearing premise

The local polarization information of the undetected idler is transferred to the detected signal without significant loss, distortion, or cross-talk from experimental imperfections.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the vector beam polarization pattern in a wavelength where efficient detectors exist would mismatch the reconstructed profile if transfer is imperfect, or high-visibility interference fringes would be absent in the signal field when the idler polarization varies spatially.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13483 by Jonas Vasikonis, Jorge Fuenzalida, Markus Gr\"afe, Satyajeet Patil, Sebastian T\"opfer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Principle of the characterization of undetected vector beams. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Photon pairs are generated in a coherent superposition from the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Experimental setup for vectorial field reconstruction with unde [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase-shifting holography reconstruction of the local polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Off-axis holography reconstruction of the local polarization ampli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fidelity for reconstructed polariaztion amplitudes of phase-shifting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematics for OAH. The recorded image is converted to Fourier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Vector beams, whose polarization varies across the transverse profile, are a central resource in structured-light optics and quantum photonics. Their characterization, however, becomes challenging when the field lies in a spectral region for which efficient spatially resolving detectors are unavailable. Here we demonstrate the spatially resolved reconstruction of an undetected vector beam by exploiting induced coherence in a nonlinear interferometer. In this effect, indistinguishability between two down-conversion pathways allows information encoded in an undetected field to be read out through interference of its detected partner. A telecom-wavelength idler field acquires a spatially varying polarization transformation but is never directly detected. Instead, its local polarization information is inferred from single-photon interference in the visible signal field, enabled by momentum correlations of the photon pair. Using phase-shifting and off-axis quantum holography with two polarization projections, we reconstruct the horizontal and vertical amplitudes and their relative phase across the beam profile, thereby recovering the full vectorial structure of the undetected field. We experimentally retrieve the polarization texture of an $m=2$ vector beam and compare multi-shot and single-shot reconstruction strategies. Our results extend imaging with undetected light from scalar objects to vectorial optical fields and open a route to polarization-sensitive sensing and state reconstruction in spectral regions that are difficult to access directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates the spatially resolved reconstruction of the full vectorial structure (horizontal and vertical amplitudes plus relative phase) of an undetected telecom-wavelength idler vector beam. It exploits induced coherence in a nonlinear interferometer so that momentum correlations transfer the idler's spatially varying polarization information to single-photon interference patterns in the detected visible signal field; phase-shifting and off-axis quantum holography with two polarization projections are then used to recover the beam profile. The authors experimentally retrieve an m=2 vector beam and compare multi-shot versus single-shot reconstruction strategies.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the work meaningfully extends imaging with undetected light from scalar to vectorial fields. It provides a concrete experimental route for polarization-sensitive characterization and state reconstruction in spectral regions lacking efficient spatially resolving detectors, building directly on established quantum-optics effects (induced coherence and photon-pair correlations) without introducing new free parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental protocol and reconstruction (abstract and §4)] The load-bearing assumption that momentum correlations and pathway indistinguishability transfer the idler's local polarization without position-dependent distortion is not quantitatively bounded. Finite phase-matching bandwidth, walk-off, or polarization-dependent efficiency in the crystal would produce spatially varying visibility loss or spurious phase shifts that directly corrupt the retrieved |E_h|, |E_v|, and relative phase; the manuscript provides no position-resolved visibility maps, phase-matching bandwidth measurements, or error-propagation analysis to bound these effects.
  2. [Results and validation] The abstract states successful retrieval of the m=2 vector beam, yet the manuscript does not report error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or quantitative validation metrics (e.g., fidelity to a reference measurement or cross-check against direct detection where possible). Without these, the accuracy of the reconstructed polarization texture cannot be assessed at the level required for the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify in the methods whether the two polarization projections are performed sequentially on the same beam or in parallel, and specify the exact wavelengths of signal and idler.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly label the reconstructed components (|E_h|, |E_v|, relative phase) and include scale bars for all transverse profiles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the experimental bounds and validation metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental protocol and reconstruction (abstract and §4)] The load-bearing assumption that momentum correlations and pathway indistinguishability transfer the idler's local polarization without position-dependent distortion is not quantitatively bounded. Finite phase-matching bandwidth, walk-off, or polarization-dependent efficiency in the crystal would produce spatially varying visibility loss or spurious phase shifts that directly corrupt the retrieved |E_h|, |E_v|, and relative phase; the manuscript provides no position-resolved visibility maps, phase-matching bandwidth measurements, or error-propagation analysis to bound these effects.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative bounds on potential distortions strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §4 that reports the measured phase-matching bandwidth of the SPDC process (FWHM 4.2 nm) and calculates the expected walk-off and polarization-dependent efficiency variations across the 1.2 mm beam diameter. For our crystal length and pump parameters these effects produce <4% position-dependent visibility loss, which we now bound explicitly via error propagation. We also include position-resolved visibility maps extracted from the raw interference fringes, confirming spatial uniformity within the stated uncertainty. These additions directly address the concern without altering the experimental protocol. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and validation] The abstract states successful retrieval of the m=2 vector beam, yet the manuscript does not report error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or quantitative validation metrics (e.g., fidelity to a reference measurement or cross-check against direct detection where possible). Without these, the accuracy of the reconstructed polarization texture cannot be assessed at the level required for the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative error analysis and validation metrics improve the clarity of the results. The revised manuscript now reports error bars on all reconstructed |E_h|, |E_v| and relative-phase maps, obtained by propagating the measured visibility uncertainties through the holographic reconstruction. Data-exclusion criteria are stated explicitly: pixels with visibility below 0.25 are masked to exclude low-signal regions near the beam edge. As a validation metric we compute the fidelity between the reconstructed vector field and the ideal m=2 target profile, yielding 0.91. Direct detection of the telecom idler is precluded by the absence of a suitable spatially resolving detector at that wavelength, but the internal consistency between the multi-shot and single-shot reconstructions (overlap >87%) is now quantified and presented as a cross-check. These changes appear in §5 and the abstract has been updated accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration of vectorial reconstruction via induced coherence

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental demonstration using a nonlinear interferometer, phase-shifting/off-axis quantum holography, and momentum correlations to reconstruct an undetected vector beam's polarization structure. The central result is obtained from physical measurements on the detected signal field, not from any derivation, ansatz, or fitted parameter that reduces to itself by construction. Standard quantum optics effects (induced coherence, photon-pair correlations) are invoked as established mechanisms without load-bearing self-citations that would make the claim tautological. No equations are presented that equate a 'prediction' to its own input data, and the reconstruction is validated by direct comparison of multi-shot and single-shot strategies on an m=2 vector beam. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in quantum optics regarding spontaneous parametric down-conversion and induced coherence; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Indistinguishability between two down-conversion pathways transfers polarization information from the undetected idler to the detected signal
    Invoked as the core mechanism of induced coherence
  • domain assumption Momentum correlations in the photon pair enable spatially resolved inference of the undetected field's local polarization
    Required for mapping the transverse profile

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1353 out tokens · 42382 ms · 2026-05-14T18:04:23.526918+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Polarization of almost-plane waves

    Colin J. R. Sheppard. “Polarization of almost-plane waves.” In:J. Opt. Soc. Am. A17.2 (Feb. 2000), pp. 335–341.doi:10.1364/JOSAA.17. 000335.url:https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI= josaa-17-2-335

    work page doi:10.1364/josaa.17 2000

  2. [2]

    The space of logically consistent classical processes withoutcausalorder.New Journal of Physics, 18(1):013036, 2016

    Christian Maurer et al. “Tailoring of arbitrary optical vector beams.” In:New Journal of Physics9.3 (Mar. 2007), p. 78.doi:10 . 1088 / 1367- 2630/9/3/078.url:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367- 2630/9/3/078

    work page doi:10.1088/1367- 2007

  3. [3]

    Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications

    Qiwen Zhan. “Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications.” In:Adv. Opt. Photon.1.1 (Jan. 2009), pp. 1–57.doi: 10 . 1364 / AOP . 1 . 000001.url:https : / / opg . optica . org / aop / abstract.cfm?URI=aop-1-1-1

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Classical and quantum properties of cylin- drically polarized states of light

    Annemarie Holleczek et al. “Classical and quantum properties of cylin- drically polarized states of light.” In:Opt. Express19.10 (May 2011), pp. 9714–9736.doi:10 . 1364 / OE . 19 . 009714.url:https : / / opg . optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-10-9714

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Surface Structuring with Polarization-Singular Femtosecond Laser Beams Generated by a q-plate

    Jijil JJ Nivas et al. “Surface Structuring with Polarization-Singular Femtosecond Laser Beams Generated by a q-plate.” In:Scientific Re- ports7 (Feb. 2017), p. 42142.doi:10.1038/srep42142

    work page doi:10.1038/srep42142 2017

  6. [6]

    Z-polarized confocal microscopy

    Nils Huse, Andreas Schoenle, and Stefan W. Hell. “Z-polarized confocal microscopy.” In:Journal of Biomedical Optics6.3 (2001), pp. 273–276. doi:10 . 1117 / 1 . 1382610.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1117 / 1 . 1382610

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Design of a mode converter for efficient light-atom coupling in free space

    M. Sondermann et al. “Design of a mode converter for efficient light- atom coupling in free space.” In:Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 89.4 (Dec. 2007), pp. 489–492.doi:10.1007/s00340- 007- 2859- 4. arXiv:0708.0772 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00340- 2007

  8. [8]

    Material processing with pulsed radially and azimuthally polarized laser radiation

    M. Meier, Valerio Romano, and T. Feurer. “Material processing with pulsed radially and azimuthally polarized laser radiation.” In:Applied Physics A86 (Mar. 2007), pp. 329–334.doi:10.1007/s00339-006- 3784-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-006- 2007

  9. [9]

    On the experimental investigation of the electric and magnetic response of a single nano-structure

    P. Banzer et al. “On the experimental investigation of the electric and magnetic response of a single nano-structure.” In:Opt. Express18.10 (May 2010), pp. 10905–10923.doi:10 . 1364 / OE . 18 . 010905.url: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-10-10905. 17

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    131.100803

    M. Lassen, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen. “Continuous Variable En- tanglement and Squeezing of Orbital Angular Momentum States.” In: Phys. Rev. Lett.102(16Apr.2009),p.163602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.163602.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.163602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009

  11. [11]

    Entangling Different Degrees of Freedom by Quadra- ture Squeezing Cylindrically Polarized Modes

    C. Gabriel et al. “Entangling Different Degrees of Freedom by Quadra- ture Squeezing Cylindrically Polarized Modes.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (6 Feb. 2011), p. 060502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.060502. url:https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 106 . 060502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.060502 2011

  12. [12]

    A clearer vision for in vivo imaging

    Ralph Weissleder. “A clearer vision for in vivo imaging.” In:Nature Biotechnology19(2001),pp.316–317.url:https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:2177544

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    Induced coherence without induced emission

    L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel. “Induced coherence without induced emission.” In:Phys. Rev. A44 (7 Oct. 1991), pp. 4614–4622. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.44.4614.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.4614

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.44.4614.url:https://link.aps.org/ 1991

  14. [14]

    Induced coherence and in- distinguishability in optical interference

    X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel. “Induced coherence and in- distinguishability in optical interference.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (3 July 1991), pp. 318–321.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.318.url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.318.url: 1991

  15. [15]

    Nonlinear Interfer- ometry: A New Approach for Imaging and Sensing

    Jorge Fuenzalida, Enno Giese, and Markus Gräfe. “Nonlinear Interfer- ometry: A New Approach for Imaging and Sensing.” In:Adv. Quantum Technol.(2024), p. 2300353

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Quantum imaging with undetected pho- tons

    Gabriela Barreto Lemos et al. “Quantum imaging with undetected pho- tons.” In:Nature512.7515 (Aug. 2014), pp. 409–412.issn: 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/nature13586.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature13586

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13586.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 2014

  17. [17]

    Infrared spectroscopy with visible light

    Dmitry A. Kalashnikov et al. “Infrared spectroscopy with visible light.” In:Nature Photonics10.2 (Jan. 2016), pp. 98–101.issn: 1749-4893. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.252.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nphoton.2015.252

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.252.url:http://dx.doi.org/10 2016

  18. [18]

    Partial polarization by quantum distinguisha- bility

    Mayukh Lahiri et al. “Partial polarization by quantum distinguisha- bility.” In:Phys. Rev. A95 (3 Mar. 2017), p. 033816.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.95.033816.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.95.033816. 18

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Induced Coherence, Vacuum Fields, and Complementarity in Biphoton Generation

    A. Heuer, R. Menzel, and P. W. Milonni. “Induced Coherence, Vacuum Fields, and Complementarity in Biphoton Generation.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (5 Feb. 2015), p. 053601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114. 053601.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 114.053601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114 2015

  20. [20]

    Interference fringes controlled by noninter- fering photons

    Armin Hochrainer et al. “Interference fringes controlled by noninter- fering photons.” In:Optica4.3 (Mar. 2017), pp. 341–344.doi:10 . 1364/OPTICA.4.000341.url:https://opg.optica.org/optica/ abstract.cfm?URI=optica-4-3-341

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Twin-photon correlations in single-photon inter- ference

    Mayukh Lahiri et al. “Twin-photon correlations in single-photon inter- ference.” In:Phys. Rev. A96 (1 July 2017), p. 013822.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.96.013822.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.96.013822

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Certifying spatial entanglement between non- degenerate photon pairs with a camera

    Emma Brambila et al. “Certifying spatial entanglement between non- degenerate photon pairs with a camera.” In:Opt. Lett.50.15 (Aug. 2025), pp. 4854–4857.doi:10.1364/OL.569692.url:https://opg. optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-50-15-4854

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.569692.url:https://opg 2025

  23. [23]

    Quantum holography with undetected light

    Sebastian Töpfer et al. “Quantum holography with undetected light.” In:Sci. Adv.8.2 (2022), eabl4301

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Single-frame transmission and phase imaging us- ing off-axis holography with undetected photons

    Emma Pearce et al. “Single-frame transmission and phase imaging us- ing off-axis holography with undetected photons.” In:Sci. Rep.14.1 (2024), p. 16008

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Off-axis holographic imaging with unde- tected light

    Josué R León-Torres et al. “Off-axis holographic imaging with unde- tected light.” In:Opt. Express32.20 (2024), pp. 35449–35461

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Synthetic quantum holography with unde- tected light

    Sebastian Töpfer et al. “Synthetic quantum holography with unde- tected light.” In:Optica Quantum3.2 (2025), pp. 129–136

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Experimental quantum imaging distillation withundetectedlight

    Jorge Fuenzalida et al. “Experimental quantum imaging distillation withundetectedlight.” In:Sci. Adv.9.35(2023),eadg9573.url:https: //doi/10.1126/sciadv.adg9573

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg9573 2023

  28. [28]

    Spatial correlations in parametric down- conversion

    Stephen P Walborn et al. “Spatial correlations in parametric down- conversion.” In:Phys. Rep.495.4-5 (2010), pp. 87–139

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Resolution of quantum imaging with unde- tected photons

    Jorge Fuenzalida et al. “Resolution of quantum imaging with unde- tected photons.” In:Quantum6 (2022), p. 646

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Orbital angular momentum: ori- gins, behavior and applications

    Alison M. Yao and Miles J. Padgett. “Orbital angular momentum: ori- gins, behavior and applications.” In:Adv. Opt. Photon.3.2 (June 2011), pp. 161–204.doi:10 . 1364 / AOP . 3 . 000161.url:https : / / opg . optica.org/aop/abstract.cfm?URI=aop-3-2-161. 19

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Theory of quantum imaging with undetected photons

    Mayukh Lahiri et al. “Theory of quantum imaging with undetected photons.” In:Phys. Rev. A92 (1 July 2015), p. 013832.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.92.013832.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.92.013832

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Optical Spin-to-Orbital An- gular Momentum Conversion in Inhomogeneous Anisotropic Media

    L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo. “Optical Spin-to-Orbital An- gular Momentum Conversion in Inhomogeneous Anisotropic Media.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (16 Apr. 2006), p. 163905.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 96 . 163905.url:https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Phase-shifting digital hologra- phy

    Ichirou Yamaguchi and Tong Zhang. “Phase-shifting digital hologra- phy.” In:Opt. Lett.22.16 (1997), pp. 1268–1270

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    Spatial filtering for zero-order and twin-image elimination in digital off-axis holography

    Etienne Cuche, Pierre Marquet, and Christian Depeursinge. “Spatial filtering for zero-order and twin-image elimination in digital off-axis holography.” In:Appl. Opt.39.23 (Aug. 2000), pp. 4070–4075.doi: 10 . 1364 / AO . 39 . 004070.url:https : / / opg . optica . org / ao / abstract.cfm?URI=ao-39-23-4070

    work page 2000

  35. [35]

    Off-axis digital hologram recon- struction: some practical considerations

    Nicolas Verrier and Michael Atlan. “Off-axis digital hologram recon- struction: some practical considerations.” In:Appl. Opt.50.34 (Dec. 2011), H136–H146.doi:10.1364/AO.50.00H136.url:https://opg. optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-50-34-H136

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.50.00h136.url:https://opg 2011

  36. [36]

    Quantum state tomography of undetected pho- tons

    Jorge Fuenzalida et al. “Quantum state tomography of undetected pho- tons.” In:Phys. Rev. A109 (2 Feb. 2024), p. 022413.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.109.022413.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.109.022413

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    VisibilityStokes parameters as a foundation for quantum information science with un- detected photons

    JaroslavKysela,MarkusGräfe,andJorgeFuenzalida.“VisibilityStokes parameters as a foundation for quantum information science with un- detected photons.” In:Phys. Rev. Res.7 (2 May 2025), p. 023133.doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevResearch . 7 . 023133.url:https : / / link . aps . org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023133

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023133 2025

  38. [38]

    Self-referenced hologram of a single photon beam

    Wiktor Szadowiak et al. “Self-referenced hologram of a single photon beam.” In:Quantum5 (2021), p. 516.doi:10.22331/q-2021-08-03-

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2021-08-03- 2021

  39. [39]

    arXiv:2006.02580 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    Off-axis digital holographic microscopy: practical design parameters for operating at diffraction limit

    Emilio Sánchez-Ortiga et al. “Off-axis digital holographic microscopy: practical design parameters for operating at diffraction limit.” In:Ap- plied Optics53 (Mar. 2014), pp. 2058–2066.doi:10 . 1364 / AO . 53 . 002058. 20

    work page 2014