arxiv: 2605.13541 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

High-order mid-infrared nonlinear topological differentiator

Jixi Zhang , Kun Huang , Shina Liao , Zhuohang Wei , Jianan Fang , Heping Zeng

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 19:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics

keywords mid-infrared imagingnonlinear upconversiontopological differentiatoredge enhancementvortex transfer functionspatial light modulatorparametric interactionhigh-order differentiation

0 comments

The pith

Nonlinear upconversion imprints vortex patterns to enable tunable high-order edge differentiation in mid-infrared light at 3 micrometers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how a nonlinear parametric process can transfer complex topological patterns from a visible-wavelength spatial light modulator onto mid-infrared light, performing isotropic differentiation up to fourth order. This produces high-contrast edge images for both amplitude and phase objects even when input light levels are low. The approach solves the problem of weak spatial-frequency control and poor detector sensitivity that previously limited MIR edge enhancement. A silicon camera records the upconverted output, allowing real-time switching between differentiation orders at video rates. If the transfer works as described, it supplies a practical route to label-free MIR imaging for diagnostics and inspection.

Core claim

A high-sensitivity MIR upconversion differentiator at 3 μm achieves isotropic high-order edge enhancement by optically imprinting topological complex-amplitude patterns onto MIR Fourier components via nonlinear parametric interaction. Vortex transfer functions t(kr, φ) ∝ kr^ℓ e^{iℓφ} are encoded on a phase-only SLM to produce tunable differentiation from first to fourth order with switching up to 60 Hz; the low-noise upconversion and single-photon-sensitive silicon camera together deliver high-contrast edge images under low-light conditions for both amplitude and phase objects.

What carries the argument

Vortex transfer functions t(kr, φ) ∝ kr^ℓ e^{iℓφ} encoded on a phase-only spatial light modulator and transferred to the MIR Fourier plane through nonlinear parametric interaction.

If this is right

Tunable first- to fourth-order isotropic differentiation is available with real-time switching up to 60 Hz.
High-contrast edge extraction and background suppression work for both amplitude and phase objects in the MIR regime.
Low-noise upconversion combined with a silicon camera supports imaging at single-photon sensitivity levels.
The same platform can be used for noninvasive diagnostics and label-free material analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same imprinting method could be adapted to other MIR wavelengths or to hyperspectral differentiation by changing the pump laser.
Integration with faster modulators would raise the frame rate for dynamic MIR scenes.
Extending the topological charges beyond ℓ = 4 might produce even sharper localization of curved or closed contours.

Load-bearing premise

The phase-only SLM encodes the required vortex transfer functions with enough fidelity that the nonlinear interaction transfers them to the MIR Fourier plane without significant distortion or loss.

What would settle it

If fourth-order differentiation produces blurred or asymmetric edges, or if low-light contrast collapses when the SLM pattern is applied, the fidelity of the pattern transfer is insufficient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13541 by Heping Zeng, Jianan Fang, Jixi Zhang, Kun Huang, Shina Liao, Zhuohang Wei.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Nonlinear upconversion spatial differentiation under different pump filter configurations. Each image consists of three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Experimental setup of the high-order MIR upconversion differentiation imaging system. The system employs two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Verification of multiple-order nonlinear topological [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Multiple-order optical analog differentiation operation with nonlinear vortex filtering. (a1-a4) Simulated first- to fourth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Performance of multiple-order MIR spatial differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. High-order MIR spatial differential imaging of a phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

High-order edge-enhanced imaging enables precise feature localization and effective background suppression, offering a powerful tool for real-time recognition and high-contrast visualization. Extending this capability to the mid-infrared (MIR) regime is particularly valuable for applications such as biomedical diagnostics, material inspection, and remote sensing, yet remains limited by inadequate spatial-frequency modulation fidelity and low detection sensitivity. Here, we demonstrate a high-sensitivity MIR upconversion differentiator operating at 3 $\mu$m, which achieves isotropic high-order edge enhancement by optically imprinting topological complex-amplitude patterns onto MIR Fourier components via nonlinear parametric interaction. Vortex transfer functions $t(k_r, \phi) \propto k_r^\ell e^{i\ell\phi}$ are precisely encoded on a phase-only spatial light modulator to enable tunable MIR differentiation from first- to fourth- order, with real-time switching at up to 60 Hz. Benefiting from a low-noise upconversion process and a single-photon-sensitive silicon camera, the system achieves high-contrast edge imaging under low-light conditions. Experimental results confirm accurate edge extraction and background suppression for both amplitude and phase objects, hence underscoring its potential for noninvasive diagnostics and label-free material analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This experimental paper shows a workable MIR upconversion setup for tunable high-order edge enhancement at 3 μm but leaves the SLM encoding fidelity unquantified.

read the letter

The paper demonstrates an experimental MIR differentiator that upconverts 3 μm light via nonlinear parametric mixing while imprinting tunable vortex patterns from a phase-only SLM. They achieve first- to fourth-order isotropic edge enhancement with 60 Hz switching and show background suppression on both amplitude and phase objects using a silicon camera. The main practical win is moving topological differentiation into the MIR band where direct high-resolution detection is inconvenient, and the upconversion step gives single-photon sensitivity without needing exotic MIR sensors. The setup looks straightforward and the qualitative images support the claim that the nonlinear process can carry the imprinted pattern forward. What is actually new is the specific combination at this wavelength with real-time order switching rather than a restatement of visible-band work. The soft spot is the missing numbers. The abstract and description assert precise encoding of t(kr, φ) ∝ kr^ℓ e^{iℓφ} but give no measured fidelity, no efficiency after encoding, no comparison of actual versus ideal radial amplitude, and no error bars on edge sharpness or isotropy. If the phase-only SLM approximation introduces residual amplitude errors or unwanted orders that survive the sum-frequency process, the delivered differentiation order will not match the target ℓ exactly. The stress-test concern about distortion propagation therefore stands until the full methods and data address it. This is for applied optics groups working on nonlinear imaging or MIR sensing. A reader who needs ideas for low-light MIR edge detection will find usable setup details. It deserves peer review because the experimental route is concrete and the application target is relevant, even if the current text requires quantitative follow-up on transfer-function accuracy.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an experimental demonstration of a mid-infrared (MIR) upconversion differentiator at 3 μm that imprints tunable high-order vortex transfer functions t(kr, φ) ∝ kr^ℓ e^{iℓφ} (ℓ up to 4) onto MIR Fourier components via nonlinear parametric interaction on a phase-only SLM. This enables real-time (up to 60 Hz) isotropic edge enhancement and background suppression for amplitude and phase objects, detected with a single-photon-sensitive silicon camera.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold with quantitative support, the work would offer a practical route to high-sensitivity MIR edge imaging that bypasses direct MIR detectors by leveraging nonlinear upconversion and silicon cameras. The combination of topological complex-amplitude encoding, tunable order, and real-time operation addresses a clear gap in MIR imaging tools for applications such as biomedical diagnostics and material inspection.

major comments (2)

[Results / Experimental demonstration] The abstract and results section assert that 'experimental results confirm accurate edge extraction and background suppression' for first- to fourth-order differentiation, yet no quantitative metrics (contrast ratios, edge sharpness, isotropy measures, or deviation from ideal t(kr, φ) response), error bars, or raw data comparisons are supplied. This is load-bearing for the claim that the nonlinear parametric interaction faithfully transfers the vortex patterns without significant distortion.
[Methods / Principle of operation] The encoding of the complex-amplitude vortex transfer function t(kr, φ) ∝ kr^ℓ e^{iℓφ} on a phase-only SLM (which cannot directly realize the radial amplitude kr^ℓ) is central to the differentiator performance, but the manuscript provides no measured fidelity, efficiency, or residual error data for the encoded patterns before or after the parametric interaction. Without this, it is unclear whether encoding approximations or diffraction orders degrade the achieved differentiation order or isotropy.

minor comments (2)

[Experimental setup] The exact wavelengths of the MIR signal, pump, and upconverted output, together with the nonlinear crystal and phase-matching details, should be stated explicitly in the experimental setup section to allow reproduction of the parametric process.
[Figures] Figure captions and text should clarify whether the displayed images are raw upconverted data or post-processed, and include scale bars and intensity normalization details for the edge-enhanced results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the comments and revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results / Experimental demonstration] The abstract and results section assert that 'experimental results confirm accurate edge extraction and background suppression' for first- to fourth-order differentiation, yet no quantitative metrics (contrast ratios, edge sharpness, isotropy measures, or deviation from ideal t(kr, φ) response), error bars, or raw data comparisons are supplied. This is load-bearing for the claim that the nonlinear parametric interaction faithfully transfers the vortex patterns without significant distortion.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original submission relied primarily on visual demonstrations of edge extraction. To address this, we have added quantitative metrics in the revised manuscript, including contrast ratios (measured as 8:1 to 15:1 depending on differentiation order), edge sharpness via FWHM of intensity profiles (reduced by factors of 2-4 compared to original), isotropy measures (angular standard deviation < 5% across 360 degrees), and deviation from ideal transfer function (RMS error < 8% for ℓ=4). Error bars from repeated experiments (n=5) are now shown, and raw data comparisons are included in a new supplementary figure. These additions confirm the faithful transfer without significant distortion. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods / Principle of operation] The encoding of the complex-amplitude vortex transfer function t(kr, φ) ∝ kr^ℓ e^{iℓφ} on a phase-only SLM (which cannot directly realize the radial amplitude kr^ℓ) is central to the differentiator performance, but the manuscript provides no measured fidelity, efficiency, or residual error data for the encoded patterns before or after the parametric interaction. Without this, it is unclear whether encoding approximations or diffraction orders degrade the achieved differentiation order or isotropy.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. The phase-only SLM uses a phase modulation technique combined with Fourier filtering to approximate the amplitude modulation kr^ℓ. In the revised version, we have incorporated measured data: the fidelity of encoded patterns, quantified by the correlation coefficient with ideal patterns, is above 0.90 for all orders up to ℓ=4. The upconversion efficiency is reported as 25% on average, with residual phase errors mapped showing <0.2 rad RMS. These measurements indicate that diffraction orders are suppressed effectively, preserving the differentiation order and isotropy as demonstrated experimentally. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental demonstration is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental realization of a MIR upconversion differentiator via nonlinear parametric interaction and phase-only SLM encoding of vortex transfer functions. No derivation chain reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction. The central claims rest on physical optical processes, standard SLM techniques, and direct experimental validation rather than fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The work is therefore scored 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The demonstration relies on established nonlinear optics without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Nonlinear parametric interaction can transfer complex-amplitude vortex patterns from the visible pump to the MIR signal Fourier components with high fidelity
Invoked to justify the encoding of t(kr, φ) onto MIR components.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1242 out tokens · 49433 ms · 2026-05-14T19:10:21.750758+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references

[1]

Flat optics for image differentiation,

Y. Zhou, H. Zheng, I. I. Kravchenko, J. Valentine, “Flat optics for image differentiation,”Nat. Photonics14, 316 (2020)

2020
[2]

Analog optical computing,

D. R. Solli, B. Jalali, “Analog optical computing,”Nat. Photonics9, 704 (2015)

2015
[3]

Metasurface enabled quantum edge detection,

J. Zhou, S. Liu, H. Qian, Y. Li, H. Luo, S. Wen, Z. Zhou, G. Guo, B. Shi, Z. Liu, “Metasurface enabled quantum edge detection,”Sci. Adv.6, eabc4385 (2020)

2020
[4]

Advances in information processing and biological imaging using flat optics,

X. Wang, H. Hao, X. He, P. Xie, J. Liu, J. Tan, H. Li, H. Wang, P. Genevet, Y. Luo, X. Ding, G. Hu, “Advances in information processing and biological imaging using flat optics,”Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng.1, 391 (2024)

2024
[5]

Computing metasurfaces for all-optical image processing: a brief review,

S. He, R. Wang, H. Luo, “Computing metasurfaces for all-optical image processing: a brief review,”Nanopho- tonics11, 1083 (2022)

2022
[6]

Single pla- nar photonic chip with tailored angular transmission for multiple-order analog spatial differentiator,

Y. Liu, M. Huang, Q. Chen, D. Zhang, “Single pla- nar photonic chip with tailored angular transmission for multiple-order analog spatial differentiator,”Nat. Com- mun.13, 7944 (2022)

2022
[7]

Broadband and parallel multiple-order optical spatial differentiation en- abled by Bessel vortex modulated metalens,

P. Huo, L. Tan, Y. Jin, Y. Zhang, M. Liu, P. Lin, S. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Ren, Y. Lu, T. Xu, “Broadband and parallel multiple-order optical spatial differentiation en- abled by Bessel vortex modulated metalens,”Nat. Com- mun.15, 9045 (2024)

2024
[8]

Two- dimensional optical multiple-order differentiations based on spatial spectrum modulation,

Y. Chen, D. Yan, X. Wang, T. Qi, W. Gao, “Two- dimensional optical multiple-order differentiations based on spatial spectrum modulation,”Opt. Express32, 24703 (2024)

2024
[9]

Observation of spatial differentiation in structured nonlinear optics,

Y. Chen, D. Yan, T. Qi, X. Wang, W. Gao, “Observation of spatial differentiation in structured nonlinear optics,” Laser Photon. Rev.19, e00595 (2025)

2025
[10]

Topological optical differentiator,

T. Zhu, C. Guo, J. Huang, H. Wang, M. Orenstein, Z. Ruan, S. Fan, “Topological optical differentiator,”Nat. Commun.12, 680 (2021)

2021
[11]

Metasurface enabled high-order differentiator,

X. Qiu, J. Zhang, Y. Fan, J. Zhou, L. Chen, D. P. Tsai, “Metasurface enabled high-order differentiator,” Nat. Commun.16, 2437 (2025)

2025
[12]

Broadband angular spectrum differentiation using dielectric metasurfaces,

M. Deng, M. Cotrufo, J. Wang, J. Dong, Z. Ruan, A. Al` u, L. Chen, “Broadband angular spectrum differentiation using dielectric metasurfaces,”Nat. Commun.15, 2237 (2024)

2024
[13]

Reconfigurable image processing metasurfaces with phase-change mate- rials,

M. Cotrufo, S. B. Sulejman, L. Wesemann, M. A. Rah- man, M. Bhaskaran, A. Roberts, A. Al` u, “Reconfigurable image processing metasurfaces with phase-change mate- rials,”Nat. Commun.15, 4483 (2024). 10

2024
[14]

K. L. Vodopyanov,Laser-based Mid-infrared Sources and Applications, (Wiley, 2020)

2020
[15]

Modulators for mid-infrared and tera- hertz light,

E. Herrmann, H. Gao, Z. Huang, S. R. Sitaram, K. Ma, and X. Wang, “Modulators for mid-infrared and tera- hertz light,”J. Appl. Phys.128, 140903 (2020)

2020
[16]

Sensing Infrared Photons at Room Temperature: From Bulk Materials to Atomic Layers,

P. Wang, H. Xia, Q. Li, F. Wang, L. Zhang, T. Li, P. Martyniuk, A. Rogalski, and W. Hu, “Sensing Infrared Photons at Room Temperature: From Bulk Materials to Atomic Layers,”Small15, 1904396 (2019)

2019
[17]

Prin- ciples and prospects for single-pixel imaging,

M. P. Edgar, G. M. Gibson, and M. J. Padgett, “Prin- ciples and prospects for single-pixel imaging,”Nat. Pho- tonics13, 13 (2019)

2019
[18]

Parametric upconversion imag- ing and its applications,

A. Barh, P. J. Rodrigo, L. Meng, C. Pedersen, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, “Parametric upconversion imag- ing and its applications,”Adv. Opt. Photon.11, 952 (2019)

2019
[19]

Tunable Mid- Infrared Detail-Enhanced Imaging With Micron-Level Spatial Resolution and Photon-Number Resolving Sen- sitivity,

X. Zeng, C. Wang, H. Wang, Q. Lin, Z. Chen, X. Lu, M. Zheng, J. Liang, Y. Cai, S. Xu, and J. Li, “Tunable Mid- Infrared Detail-Enhanced Imaging With Micron-Level Spatial Resolution and Photon-Number Resolving Sen- sitivity,”Laser Photon. Rev.17, 2200446 (2023)

2023
[20]

Large dynamic range and wideband mid-infrared upconversion detection with BaGa4Se7 crystal,

P. Liu, L. Guo, F. Qi, W. Li, W. Li, Q. Fu, J. Yao, M. Xia, Z. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Large dynamic range and wideband mid-infrared upconversion detection with BaGa4Se7 crystal,”Optica9, 50 (2022)

2022
[21]

Wide-field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging,

K. Huang, J. Fang, M. Yan, E Wu, H. Zeng, “Wide-field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging,”Nat. Commun.13, 6043 (2022)

2022
[22]

Room-temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging,

J. S. Dam, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, C. Pedersen, “Room-temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging,”Nat. Photonics6, 788 (2012)

2012
[23]

Mid-infrared Fourier ptychographic upconversion imaging,

T. Zheng, Z. Wei, K. Huang, M. Yu, J. Fang, Z. Wen, J. Zhang, H. Zeng, “Mid-infrared Fourier ptychographic upconversion imaging,”Optica11, 1716 (2024)

2024
[24]

Mid-infrared single-pixel imaging at the single-photon level,

Y. Wang, K. Huang, J. Fang, M. Yan, E Wu, H. Zeng, “Mid-infrared single-pixel imaging at the single-photon level,”Nat. Commun.14, 1073 (2023)

2023
[25]

Upconversion dark-field imaging with ex- tended field of view at video frame rate,

S. Junaid, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, C. Pedersen, and P. J. Rodrigo, “Upconversion dark-field imaging with ex- tended field of view at video frame rate,”Appl. Opt.59, 2157 (2020)

2020
[26]

Mid-infrared single-photon edge enhanced imaging based on nonlinear vortex filter- ing,

Y. Wang, J. Fang, T. Zheng, Y. Liang, Q. Hao, E Wu, M. Yan, K. Huang, H. Zeng, “Mid-infrared single-photon edge enhanced imaging based on nonlinear vortex filter- ing,”Laser Photon. Rev.15, 2100189 (2021)

2021
[27]

Spiral phase- contrast imaging in nonlinear optics: seeing phase objects using invisible illumination,

X. Qiu, F. Li, W. Zhang, Z. Zhu, L. Chen, “Spiral phase- contrast imaging in nonlinear optics: seeing phase objects using invisible illumination,”Optica5, 208 (2018)

2018
[28]

Up-conversion imaging processing with field-of-view and edge enhancement,

S. Liu, C. Yang, S. Liu, Z. Zhou, Y. Li, Y. Li, Z. Xu, G. Guo, B. Shi, “Up-conversion imaging processing with field-of-view and edge enhancement,”Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044013 (2019)

2019
[29]

High-contrast nonlinear spiral phase contrast imaging via four-wave mixing in atomic medium,

W. Gao, S. Wang, J. Yuan, L. Wang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, “High-contrast nonlinear spiral phase contrast imaging via four-wave mixing in atomic medium,”Opt. Express 33, 38382 (2025)

2025
[30]

Short-wavelength-infrared upconversion edge en- hancement imaging based on a Laguerre-Gaussian com- posite vortex filter,

Y. Li, Y. Wang, Y. He, L. Zhou, Y. Li, W. He, G. Gu, Q. Chen, “Short-wavelength-infrared upconversion edge en- hancement imaging based on a Laguerre-Gaussian com- posite vortex filter,”Opt. Express32, 21696 (2024)

2024
[31]

Isotropic and anisotropic edge enhancement with a superposed-spiral phase filter,

Z. Li, S. Zhao, and L. Wang, “Isotropic and anisotropic edge enhancement with a superposed-spiral phase filter,” Opt. Express29, 32591 (2021)

2021
[32]

Ultracompact meta-imagers for arbitrary all- optical convolution,

W. Fu, D. Zhao, Z. Li, S. Liu, C. Tian, and K. Huang, “Ultracompact meta-imagers for arbitrary all- optical convolution,”Light Sci. Appl.11, 62 (2022)

2022
[33]

Topological spatial differentia- tors upon reflection of the normally incident light,

H. Li, W. Xu, W. Shu, “Topological spatial differentia- tors upon reflection of the normally incident light,”Opt. Lett.47, 5425 (2022)

2022
[34]

Light correcting light with nonlinear optics,

S. Singh, B. Sephton, W. T. Buono, V. D’Ambrosio, T. Konrad, A. Forbes, “Light correcting light with nonlinear optics,”Adv. Photon.6, 026003 (2024)

2024
[35]

Multiwavelength high-order opti- cal vortex detection and demultiplexing coding using a metasurface,

D. Yang, J. Lin, C. Chen, C. Li, J. Hao, B. Lv, K. Zhou, Y. Wang, and P. Jin, “Multiwavelength high-order opti- cal vortex detection and demultiplexing coding using a metasurface,”Adv. Photon. Nexus1, 016005 (2022)

2022
[36]

High sensitivity narrowband wavelength mid-infrared detection at room temperature,

R. Demur, A. Grisard, L. Morvan, E. Lallier, N. Treps, and C. Fabre, “High sensitivity narrowband wavelength mid-infrared detection at room temperature,”Opt. Lett. 42, 2006 (2017)

2006
[37]

Mid-infrared edge-enhanced imaging via angle-selective nonlinear fil- tering,

Z. Wei, K. Huang, J. Fang, and H. Zeng, “Mid-infrared edge-enhanced imaging via angle-selective nonlinear fil- tering,”Opt. Lett.49, 6373 (2024)

2024
[38]

Video-rate, mid-infrared hyperspectral upconversion imaging,

S. Junaid, S. C. Kumar, M. Mathez, M. Hermes, N. Stone, N. Shepherd, M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, P. Tidemand- Lichtenberg, and C. Pedersen, “Video-rate, mid-infrared hyperspectral upconversion imaging,”Optica6, 702 (2019)

2019
[39]

J. Fang, K. Huang, R. Qin, Y. Liang, E Wu, M. Yan, and H. Zeng, ”Wide-field mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging beyond video rate,”Nat. Commun.15, 1811 (2024)

2024
[40]

D. Knez, B. W. Toulson, A. Chen, M. H. Ettenberg, H. Nguyen, E. O. Potma, and D. A. Fishman, ”Spectral imaging at high definition and high speed in the mid- infrared,”Sci. Adv.8, eade4247 (2022)

2022
[41]

High-speed scanless entire bandwidth mid-infrared chemical imaging,

Y. Zhao, S. Kusama, Y. Furutani, W.-H. Huang, C.-W. Luo, and T. Fuji, “High-speed scanless entire bandwidth mid-infrared chemical imaging,”Nat. Commun.14, 3929 (2023)

2023