arxiv: 2605.13584 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Ghost State of Light

R. M. de Boer , C. Toebes , Jan Klars , S. R. K. Rodriguez

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords ghost statesaddle-node bifurcationoptical cavitynonlinear response with memoryphase space bottlenecklong-lived non-stationary stateprethermalization

0 comments

The pith

A single-mode optical cavity sustains a ghost state of light with lifetimes exceeding the photon lifetime by over ten orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the observation of a long-lived non-stationary state of light in a single-mode optical cavity, identified as the ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation. This ghost creates a bottleneck in phase space that traps the system for parametrically long times when a nonlinear response with memory steers trajectories away from the true attractor. The state appears as a plateau in the relaxation of cavity transmission and persists even under strong fluctuations. The work shows how the ghost lifetime scales with memory time and distance to the bifurcation, establishing minimal conditions for such extended non-stationary behavior.

Core claim

What carries the argument

The ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation, which forms a bottleneck in phase space when accessed by a nonlinear response that possesses memory and steers trajectories into the bottleneck.

If this is right

Ghost lifetimes vary systematically with the memory time of the nonlinear response and the distance to the bifurcation.
The distribution of ghost lifetimes at fixed driving conditions shows scaling signatures.
The ghost state manifests as a plateau in cavity transmission relaxation dynamics that resembles prethermalization.
These parametrically long-lived non-stationary states remain observable even when strong fluctuations are present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same memory-steering mechanism could generate long-lived transients in other driven nonlinear systems such as mechanical resonators or chemical oscillators near saddle-node points.
Controlling the memory time might allow deliberate extension or suppression of these bottlenecks for applications in optical delay lines or information storage.
The observed scaling in lifetime distributions may connect to universal statistics of critical slowing down near bifurcations in dissipative systems.

Load-bearing premise

The observed plateau in cavity transmission relaxation arises because memory in the nonlinear response steers trajectories into the phase-space bottleneck created by the ghost of the saddle-node bifurcation.

What would settle it

Recording cavity transmission relaxation curves with the memory removed from the nonlinear response and finding no extended plateau or lifetimes comparable to the photon lifetime would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13584 by C. Toebes, Jan Klars, R. M. de Boer, S. R. K. Rodriguez.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Plateau duration as a function of distance from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effective phase-space potentials at the start and end [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Region in parameter space where the cavity is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Force magnitude, in color, in the complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We report the observation of a long-lived non-stationary state of light in a single-mode optical cavity. The observed state is a ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation which creates a bottleneck in phase space. While such ghosts are known to exist, accessing them is challenging because it requires a mechanism that steers the relaxation pathway away from the true attractor and into the bottleneck where the ghost emerges. Here we identify such a mechanism, namely a nonlinear response with memory. Our experimental system leverages this mechanism, enabling us to observe ghost states with lifetimes exceeding the cavity photon lifetime by more than ten orders of magnitude, even in the presence of strong fluctuations. The ghost manifests as a plateau in the relaxation dynamics of the cavity transmission, reminiscent of prethermalization. We show how the ghost lifetime depends on the memory time and the distance to the bifurcation, and we observe signatures of scaling in the distribution of ghost lifetimes at fixed driving conditions. Our work establishes minimal conditions for realizing parametrically long-lived non-stationary states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports an experimental observation of ghost states in a driven optical cavity enabled by memory nonlinearity, with claimed lifetimes over ten orders longer than photon decay, but the abstract leaves the supporting data and controls thin.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors have observed a long-lived non-stationary state in a single-mode optical cavity that they identify as the ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation. Memory in the nonlinear response is presented as the key mechanism that steers trajectories into the slow bottleneck region instead of letting them relax straight to the attractor. This produces a plateau in cavity transmission that lasts far beyond the usual photon lifetime, even under strong fluctuations, and they report how the lifetime scales with memory time and distance to the bifurcation plus some distribution signatures at fixed drive conditions. The framing as minimal conditions for parametrically long-lived states is straightforward and connects to prethermalization ideas without overclaiming broader applications. What the work does well is isolate memory as the steering ingredient and show concrete experimental signatures rather than just theory. The scaling relations and the statistical aspect of the lifetimes give the result some quantitative content that goes beyond a single anecdote. The soft spots are mostly evidentiary. The ten-order lifetime extension is striking on paper, but without the actual relaxation traces, error bars, or explicit checks against slow drifts or other hidden timescales, it is difficult to judge how cleanly the memory effect has been separated from everything else. The claim that this occurs despite strong fluctuations also needs the raw statistics to hold up. Alternative explanations, such as effective averaging over multiple modes or drive imperfections, are not obviously ruled out from the abstract alone. This is for readers working on non-equilibrium dynamics in nonlinear optics or photonics who already care about bifurcation ghosts and transient states. Someone running driven cavities or studying memory materials would get usable ideas from the setup and the reported dependencies. It deserves a serious referee because the central mechanism is specific enough and the potential payoff is clear enough that peer review can test the data and tighten the controls rather than reject outright. I would send it for review.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to experimentally observe a long-lived non-stationary 'ghost' state of light in a single-mode optical cavity, arising as the ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation that creates a phase-space bottleneck. This state is accessed via a nonlinear response possessing memory, which steers relaxation trajectories into the bottleneck rather than the true attractor. The ghost manifests as a plateau in cavity transmission relaxation dynamics, with reported lifetimes exceeding the cavity photon lifetime by more than ten orders of magnitude even under strong fluctuations. The work further claims that the ghost lifetime scales with memory time and distance to the bifurcation, and presents signatures of scaling in the distribution of ghost lifetimes under fixed driving conditions, establishing minimal conditions for such parametrically long-lived states.

Significance. If the central experimental claims and their interpretation hold, the result would be significant for nonlinear optics and dynamical systems by providing a concrete, accessible realization of saddle-node ghost dynamics in a physical system. The extreme lifetime ratio (ten orders of magnitude) and the explicit dependence on memory time plus bifurcation distance would constitute a notable experimental benchmark for bottleneck phenomena, with the prethermalization analogy offering a bridge to broader concepts in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. The identification of memory in the nonlinear response as the steering mechanism is a useful minimal condition that could guide future studies of long-lived transients.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the precise definition of the 'memory time' (e.g., whether it is the relaxation time of the nonlinear medium or a fitted parameter) should be stated explicitly with its experimental extraction method, as this quantity is central to the claimed scaling.
[Figure 4] Figure 4 (or equivalent distribution panel): the reported scaling signatures in the ghost-lifetime distribution would be strengthened by an explicit comparison to the expected functional form from saddle-node ghost theory (e.g., the inverse-square-root divergence or exponential tail), including a quantitative fit statistic.
[§2] §2: the cavity photon lifetime used as the reference for the ten-order-of-magnitude claim should be given with its measured value and uncertainty; without this, the ratio cannot be independently verified from the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive summary and recommendation of minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of the experimental significance of the ghost-state observation and the role of memory in the nonlinear response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of cavity transmission relaxation showing a plateau whose lifetime scales with memory time and bifurcation distance. The central claim identifies the nonlinear response with memory as the steering mechanism based on the physical setup and observed dynamics, without any derivation step that defines the ghost lifetime from fitted parameters or reduces a prediction to an input by construction. Known saddle-node ghost phenomenology is invoked as background, but the extreme lifetime ratio and distribution signatures are presented as measured outcomes, not tautological outputs of the model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard dynamical-systems knowledge of saddle-node ghosts plus an experimental nonlinear-optical setup; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

axioms (1)

standard math Saddle-node bifurcations produce ghost states that create bottlenecks in phase space
Invoked to interpret the observed plateau as a ghost state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5484 in / 1175 out tokens · 60761 ms · 2026-05-14T18:57:41.662874+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The ghost manifests as a plateau in the relaxation dynamics of the cavity transmission... proximity to a SNB is insufficient... A nonzero memory time is also needed.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references

[1]

Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press, 2018)

N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press, 2018)

2018
[2]

W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 105701 (2005)

2005
[3]

Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the kibble-zurek mechanism of topological defect produc- tion: Landau-zener transitions from a new perspective, Phys

B. Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the kibble-zurek mechanism of topological defect produc- tion: Landau-zener transitions from a new perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 035701 (2005)

2005
[4]

Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv

J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv. Phys.59, 1063 (2010)

2010
[5]

Navon, A

N. Navon, A. L. Gaunt, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a homogeneous bose gas, Science347, 167 (2015)

2015
[6]

K. Du, X. Fang, C. Won, C. De, F.-T. Huang, W. Xu, H. You, F. J. G´ omez-Ruiz, A. Del Campo, and S.-W. Cheong, Kibble–zurek mechanism of ising domains, Nat. Phys.19, 1495 (2023)

2023
[7]

K. Lee, S. Kim, T. Kim, and Y.-i. Shin, Universal kibble–zurek scaling in an atomic fermi superfluid, Nat. Phys.20, 1570 (2024)

2024
[8]

Nandkishore and D

R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 15 (2015)

2015
[9]

D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

2019
[10]

Schreiber, S

M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

2015
[11]

H. P. L¨ uschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Alt- man, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of slow dynamics near the many-body localization transition in one-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 260401 (2017)

2017
[12]

Morong, F

W. Morong, F. Liu, P. Becker, K. Collins, L. Feng, A. Kyprianidis, G. Pagano, T. You, A. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Observation of stark many-body localization without disorder, Nature599, 393 (2021)

2021
[13]

Berges, S

J. Berges, S. Bors´ anyi, and C. Wetterich, Prethermal- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 142002 (2004)

2004
[14]

Moeckel and S

M. Moeckel and S. Kehrein, Interaction quench in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 175702 (2008)

2008
[15]

F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti, Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2016(6), 064002

2016
[16]

Reimann and L

P. Reimann and L. Dabelow, Typicality of prethermal- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett122, 080603 (2019)

2019
[17]

D. J. Luitz, R. Moessner, S. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, Prethermalization without temperature, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021046 (2020)

2020
[18]

Pomeau and P

Y. Pomeau and P. Manneville, Intermittent transition to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems, Commun. Math. Phys.74, 189 (1980)

1980
[19]

S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engi- neering(Addison-Wesley, 1994)

1994
[20]

Sardany´ es, C

J. Sardany´ es, C. Raich, and T. Alarcon, Noise-induced stabilization of saddle-node ghosts, New J. Phys.22, 093064 (2020)

2020
[21]

Canela, L

J. Canela, L. Alsed` a, N. Fagella, and J. Sardany´ es, Dynamical mechanism behind ghosts unveiled in a map complexification, Chaos Solit. Fractals156, 111780 (2022)

2022
[22]

D. Koch, A. Nandan, G. Ramesan, I. Tyukin, A. Gor- ban, and A. Koseska, Ghost channels and ghost cy- cles guiding long transients in dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 047202 (2024)

2024
[23]

Zheng, P

Z. Zheng, P. Beck, T. Yang, O. Ashtari, J. P. Parker, and T. M. Schneider, Ghost states underlying spatial and temporal patterns: How nonexistent invariant solutions control nonlinear dynamics, Phys. Rev. E112, 024212 (2025)

2025
[24]

Gimeno, A

J. Gimeno, A. Jorba, and J. Sardany´ es, On the effect of time lags on a saddle-node remnant in hyperbolic repli- cators, Phys. A : Math. Theor.51, 385601 (2018)

2018
[25]

Fucho-Rius, S

M. Fucho-Rius, S. Maretvadakethope, `A. Haro, T. Alarc´ on, J. Sardany´ es, and R. P´ erez-Carrasco, Local nearby bifurcations lead to synergies in critical slowing down: The case of mushroom bifurcations, Phys. Rev. E111, 024213 (2025). 6

2025
[26]

Abouelela, M

A. Abouelela, M. Turaev, R. Kramer, M. Janning, M. Kajan, S. Ray, and J. Kroha, Stabilizing open photon condensates by ghost-attractor dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 053402 (2025)

2025
[27]

D. Koch, U. Feudel, and A. Koseska, Criticality gov- erns response dynamics and entrainment of periodically forced ghost cycles, Phys. Rev. E112, 014205 (2025)

2025
[28]

H. Su, D. Li, J. Duan, X. Zhang, Y. Yue, and C. Gre- bogi, Chaotic ghosts in systems with parameter drift: Delay and control critical transitions, Phys. Rev. E113, 044207 (2026)

2026
[29]

S. T. Trickey and L. N. Virgin, Bottlenecking phe- nomenon near a saddle-node remnant in a duffing os- cillator, Phys. Lett. A248, 185 (1998)

1998
[30]

J. Noh, P. Kim, and Y.-J. Yoon, Nonlinear shock isola- tion using the bottleneck phenomenon near a saddle– node ghost, Mech. Syst. Signal Process.223, 111889 (2025)

2025
[31]

Z. Geng, K. Peters, A. Trichet, K. Malmir, R. Kolkowski, J. Smith, and S. Rodriguez, Universal scaling in the dynamic hysteresis, and non-markovian dynamics, of a tunable optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153603 (2020)

2020
[32]

Peters, Z

K. Peters, Z. Geng, K. Malmir, J. Smith, and S. Ro- driguez, Extremely broadband stochastic resonance of light and enhanced energy harvesting enabled by mem- ory effects in the nonlinear response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 213901 (2021)

2021
[33]

Peters and S

K. Peters and S. Rodriguez, Limit cycles and chaos in- duced by a nonlinearity with memory, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.231, 247 (2022)

2022
[34]

Braeckeveldt, K

B. Braeckeveldt, K. Peters, B. Verdonschot, B. Maes, and S. Rodriguez, Memory-induced excitability in opti- cal cavities, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023008 (2024)

2024
[35]

See Supplemental Material for details about the experi- mental thermal relaxation time, the scaling of the ghost lifetime withτ, and the ghost lifetime distributions un- der the influence of noise
[36]

Carusotto and C

I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

2013
[37]

Casteels, R

W. Casteels, R. Fazio, and C. Ciuti, Critical dynamical properties of a first-order dissipative phase transition, Phys. Rev. A95, 012128 (2017)

2017
[38]

S. R. K. Rodriguez, W. Casteels, F. Storme, N. Car- lon Zambon, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, C. Ciuti, and J. Bloch, Prob- ing a dissipative phase transition via dynamical optical hysteresis, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 247402 (2017)

2017
[39]

Biondi, G

M. Biondi, G. Blatter, H. E. T¨ ureci, and S. Schmidt, Nonequilibrium gas-liquid transition in the driven- dissipative photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. A96, 043809 (2017)

2017
[40]

T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schneider, and A. Imamoglu, Signatures of a dissipative phase transi- tion in photon correlation measurements, Nat. Phys.14, 365 (2018)

2018
[41]

Nigro, D

D. Nigro, D. Trypogeorgos, A. Gianfrate, D. Sanvitto, I. Carusotto, and D. Gerace, Supersolidity of polariton condensates in photonic crystal waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 056002 (2025)

2025
[42]

S. H. Strogatz and R. M. Westervelt, Predicted power laws for delayed switching of charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. B40, 10501 (1989)

1989
[43]

3 is slightly further away from the SNB than in Fig

∆ in Fig. 3 is slightly further away from the SNB than in Fig. 1, but still within the red circle in Fig. 2(a). ∆ was changed for illustration purposes only. Otherwise, infinitesimally close to the SNB (as in Fig. 1) the phase- space region of slow evolution is too small to be seen in Fig. 3
[44]

Redner, A first look at first-passage processes, Physica A Stat

S. Redner, A first look at first-passage processes, Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl.631, 128545 (2023)

2023
[45]

J. L. Doob, The brownian movement and stochastic equations, Ann. Math.43, 351 (1942)

1942
[46]

Beaulieu, F

G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Fe- licetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Observation of first-and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven kerr resonator, Nat. Commun.16, 1954 (2025)

1954
[47]

Jayesh Shah, P

A. Jayesh Shah, P. Kirton, S. Felicetti, and H. Alaeian, Dissipative phase transition in the two-photon dicke model, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 173602 (2025)

2025
[48]

Vivas-Via˜ na, A

A. Vivas-Via˜ na, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and C. S. Mu˜ noz, Unconventional mechanism of virtual-state population through dissipation, Phys. Rev. A106, 012217 (2022)

2022
[49]

Bibak, U

F. Bibak, U. c. v. Deli´ c, M. Aspelmeyer, and B. Daki´ c, Dissipative phase transitions in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A107, 053505 (2023)

2023
[50]

Miguel-Torcal, A

A. Miguel-Torcal, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, F. J. Garc´ ıa- Vidal, and A. I. Fern´ andez-Dom´ ınguez, Multiqubit quantum state preparation enabled by topology opti- mization, Opt. quantum2, 371 (2024)

2024
[51]

Cotrufo, A

M. Cotrufo, A. Cordaro, D. L. Sounas, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Passive bias-free non-reciprocal metasurfaces based on thermally nonlinear quasi-bound states in the continuum, Nat. Photon.18, 81 (2024)

2024
[52]

J. King, C. Wan, T. J. Park, S. Deshpande, Z. Zhang, S. Ramanathan, and M. A. Kats, Electrically tun- able VO2–metal metasurface for mid-infrared switching, limiting and nonlinear isolation, Nat. Photon.18, 74 (2024)

2024
[53]

Barulin, O

A. Barulin, O. Pashina, D. Riabov, O. Sergaeva, Z. Sadrieva, A. Shcherbakov, V. Rutckaia, J. Schilling, A. Bogdanov, I. Sinev, A. Chernov, and M. Petrov, Thermo-optical bistability enabled by bound states in the continuum in silicon metasurfaces, Laser Photonics Rev.18, 2301399 (2024)

2024
[54]

Sanvitto and S

D. Sanvitto and S. K´ ena-Cohen, The road towards po- laritonic devices, Nat. Mater.15, 1061 (2016)

2016
[55]

Kavokin, T

A. Kavokin, T. C. Liew, C. Schneider, P. G. Lagoudakis, S. Klembt, and S. Hoefling, Polariton condensates for classical and quantum computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 435 (2022)

2022
[56]

P. M. Walker, L. Tinkler, B. Royall, D. V. Skryabin, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, M. S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Dark Solitons in High Velocity Waveg- uide Polariton Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 097403 (2017)

2017
[57]

Stepanov, I

P. Stepanov, I. Amelio, J.-G. Rousset, J. Bloch, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, A. Minguzzi, I. Carusotto, and M. Richard, Dispersion relation of the collective excita- tions in a resonantly driven polariton fluid, Nat. Com- mun.10, 3869 (2019)

2019
[58]

Amelio, A

I. Amelio, A. Minguzzi, M. Richard, and I. Carusotto, Galilean boosts and superfluidity of resonantly driven polariton fluids in the presence of an incoherent reser- voir, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023158 (2020). 7

2020
[59]

Estrecho, T

E. Estrecho, T. Gao, N. Bobrovska, D. Comber-Todd, M. D. Fraser, M. Steger, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, T. C. H. Liew, M. Ma- tuszewski, D. W. Snoke, A. G. Truscott, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Direct measurement of polariton-polariton interaction strength in the thomas-fermi regime of exciton-polariton condensation, Phys. Rev. B100, 03...

2019
[60]

A. M. Grudinina and N. S. Voronova, Dark and thermal reservoir contributions to polariton sound velocity, Phys. Rev. B106, L121301 (2022)

2022
[61]

Vretenar, M

M. Vretenar, M. Puplauskis, and J. Klaers, Mir- ror surface nanostructuring via laser direct writ- ing—characterization and physical origins, Adv. Opt. Mater.11, 2202820 (2023)

2023
[62]

Kurtscheid, D

C. Kurtscheid, D. Dung, A. Redmann, E. Busley, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Schmitt, and M. Weitz, Re- alizing arbitrary trapping potentials for light via direct laser writing of mirror surface profiles, EPL130, 54001 (2020)

2020
[63]

K. J. H. Peters and S. R. K. Rodriguez, Exceptional precision of a nonlinear optical sensor at a square-root singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 013901 (2022)

2022
[64]

Kiesewetter, R

S. Kiesewetter, R. Polkinghorne, B. Opanchuk, and P. D. Drummond, xspde: Extensible software for stochastic equations, SoftwareX5, 12 (2016)

2016
[65]

Peters, J

K. Peters, J. Busink, P. Ackermans, K. Cogn´ ee, and S. Rodriguez, Scalar potentials for light in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013154 (2023). END MA TTER Appendix A: Experimental setup—The cavity is made by a planar and a concave distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) mirror, each with a peak reflectance of 99.9% at 530 nm. The DBRs of the planar and concave mi...

2023