arxiv: 2605.13665 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 💻 cs.RO

Recognition: unknown

Robot Squid Game: Quadrupedal Locomotion for Traversing Narrow Tunnels

Amir Hossain Raj , Dibyendu Das , Xuesu Xiao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO

keywords quadrupedal locomotionreinforcement learningpolicy distillationtunnel navigationprocedural generationconfined spacesteacher-student learning

0 comments

The pith

Quadruped robots learn to traverse narrow tunnels by distilling specialized policies from procedurally generated environments into one unified policy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that a reinforcement learning setup using procedural tunnel generation plus teacher-student distillation produces a single policy that lets quadruped robots move reliably through varied confined 3D spaces. This approach breaks complex navigation into simpler subtasks handled first by expert policies, then transferred to the student, avoiding the usual problems of rigid gaits and hand-crafted rewards. A sympathetic reader would care because search-and-rescue or inspection robots often encounter unpredictable tunnels where existing methods get stuck, and this method claims to succeed across those cases in both simulation and hardware tests.

Core claim

By synthesizing diverse tunnel structures during training and distilling navigation strategies into a generalizable policy, the method achieves consistent traversal across complex spatial constraints where conventional approaches fail.

What carries the argument

Teacher-student policy distillation in which specialized expert policies trained on procedurally generated tunnel geometries transfer knowledge to a single student policy.

If this is right

Eliminates the need for complex reward shaping in end-to-end RL training.
Enables consistent performance across multiple distinct tunnel geometries.
Supports direct deployment from simulation to physical robots in confined spaces.
Breaks navigation into smaller subtasks that each expert policy learns more readily.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same procedural-plus-distillation pattern could be applied to other confined locomotion settings such as caves or collapsed structures.
Reducing manual reward design may shorten the time to field a new robot morphology for inspection tasks.
Extending the procedural generator with additional parameters like varying friction or lighting could further improve real-world robustness.

Load-bearing premise

Policies trained only on procedurally generated tunnel geometries will transfer directly to real-world tunnel shapes without further adaptation.

What would settle it

Real-world trials in which the distilled student policy fails to complete traversal through tunnels whose cross-sections, curvatures, or obstacle placements fall outside the procedural generation distribution used in training.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13665 by Amir Hossain Raj, Dibyendu Das, Xuesu Xiao.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: SQUID is deployed in real-world tunnel environments, demonstrating the adaptability and robustness of the proposed approach. The quadrupedal robot relies on limited visual perception to navigate confined spaces, successfully traversing narrow passages and uneven terrain. irregular cross-sections, tight turns, and limited visual accessibility—environments where current locomotion strategies frequently fai… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Quadruped robot executing its learned locomotion policy to traverse a confined tunnel, dynamically adjusting its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Simulation training environment for tunnel analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Training pipeline for SQUID. Teacher policies are first trained using RL with privileged information for each tunnel class. Distillation transfers expert knowledge to a unified student policy, which is trained using onboard sensing. asymmetric spaces. This curriculum-based approach ensures that the policy learns effective locomotion strategies incrementally, reinforcing fundamental movement principles bef… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Parallelized training of quadrupedal robots in confined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Success Rate comparison across different tunnel classes and difficulty levels. Each plot represents a specific tunnel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Comparison of Completion Time (CT), Collision [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Quadruped robots demonstrate exceptional potential for navigating complex terrain in critical applications such as search and rescue missions and infrastructure inspection However autonomous traversal of confined 3D environments including tunnels caves and collapsed structures remains a significant challenge Existing methods often struggle with rigid gait patterns limited adaptability to diverse geometries and reliance on oversimplified environmental assumptions This paper introduces a Reinforcement Learning RL framework that combines procedural environment generation with policy distillation to enable robust locomotion across various tunnel configurations Our approach leverages a teacher student training paradigm where specialized expert policies trained on procedurally generated tunnel geometries transfer their knowledge to a unified student policy This strategy eliminates the need for complex reward shaping in end-to-end RL training simplifying the process by breaking down complicated tasks into smaller more manageable components that are easier for the robot to learn By synthesizing diverse tunnel structures during training and distilling navigation strategies into a generalizable policy our method achieves consistent traversal across complex spatial constraints where conventional approaches fail We demonstrate through both simulation and real world experiments that our method enables quadruped robots to successfully traverse challenging confined tunnel environments

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a practical RL method for quadrupeds in tunnels but skimps on the quantitative evidence for its claims.

read the letter

The paper's main point is that a combination of procedural tunnel generation and teacher-student distillation lets a quadruped learn to navigate narrow confined spaces without needing fancy reward functions. They train expert policies on lots of varied synthetic tunnels, then distill that into a single student policy that works across them. The abstract claims this succeeds in both simulation and real hardware experiments. What they do well is tackle a real robotics problem head on. Search and rescue and inspection often involve tight spaces, and standard gaits or planners struggle there. Breaking it into expert training plus distillation is a reasonable way to simplify learning. The procedural generation part makes sense for creating diversity without manual design. The soft spots are in the validation. No numbers appear on success rates, failure cases, or how the real tunnels compare to the generated ones in terms of width, curvature, or surface properties. Without baselines like standard RL or motion planning methods, it's tough to see the improvement. The sim-to-real transfer is asserted but not backed by any quantitative match between the procedural model and physical conditions, which could include things like friction changes or obstacles not in the generation process. This is for robotics folks focused on locomotion in unstructured or confined environments. Someone working on similar RL setups for robots would find the training paradigm useful to consider, even if they need to add their own metrics. I think it deserves peer review. The idea is grounded in established techniques applied to a useful domain, and referees can push for the missing experimental details to make the claims stronger.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a reinforcement learning framework for quadrupedal locomotion in narrow tunnels that combines procedural generation of diverse tunnel geometries with a teacher-student policy distillation paradigm. Expert policies are trained on procedurally generated environments and distilled into a single student policy, with the claim that this yields a generalizable controller capable of consistent traversal in complex confined spaces. Success is asserted in both simulation and real-world experiments, eliminating the need for complex end-to-end reward shaping.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the approach could advance sim-to-real transfer techniques for constrained 3D navigation in robotics, particularly for search-and-rescue and inspection tasks. The procedural diversity plus distillation strategy offers a scalable alternative to hand-crafted rewards or extensive domain randomization, potentially reducing training complexity while improving adaptability to varied tunnel geometries.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the method 'achieves consistent traversal across complex spatial constraints where conventional approaches fail' and succeeds in 'simulation and real world experiments' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, success rates, traversal times, failure modes, or baseline comparisons. Without these data the empirical contribution cannot be evaluated.
[Abstract] Abstract and Methods (procedural generation section): The assumption that procedurally generated tunnels adequately span real-world geometric and contact variations (width, curvature, surface irregularities, friction) is load-bearing for the sim-to-real claim, yet no parameter ranges, validation against physical tunnels, or ablation on generation fidelity are provided.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: Missing punctuation and run-on sentences (e.g., 'inspection However autonomous' and 'missions and infrastructure inspection') impair readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical RL training pipeline

full rationale

The paper presents an RL framework that trains expert policies on procedurally generated tunnels and distills them into a student policy, validated via simulation and real-world experiments. No equations, derivations, or parameter-fitting steps appear that would reduce any claimed result to its inputs by construction. The approach follows standard teacher-student distillation without self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central claim. Experimental outcomes serve as independent evidence rather than tautological restatements of the training procedure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that procedurally generated tunnels sufficiently represent real-world confined geometries and that distilled policies will generalize without explicit domain adaptation beyond the described process.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Procedurally generated tunnel geometries are representative of real-world confined environments
Invoked when claiming transfer from simulation to real tunnels

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1164 out tokens · 49380 ms · 2026-05-14T18:16:47.757459+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Learning to navigate sidewalks in outdoor environments,

M. Sorokin, J. Tan, C. K. Liu, and S. Ha, “Learning to navigate sidewalks in outdoor environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3906–3913, 2022

work page 2022
[2]

Barkour: Benchmarking animal-level agility with quadruped robots,

K. Caluwaerts, A. Iscen, J. C. Kew, W. Yu, T. Zhang, D. Freeman, K.-H. Lee, L. Lee, S. Saliceti, V . Zhuang, N. Batchelor, S. Bohez, F. Casarini, J. E. Chen, O. Cortes, E. Coumans, A. Dostmohamed, G. Dulac-Arnold, A. Escontrela, E. Frey, R. Hafner, D. Jain, B. Jyenis, Y . Kuang, E. Lee, L. Luu, O. Nachum, K. Oslund, J. Powell, D. Reyes, F. Romano, F. Sade...

work page arXiv 2023
[3]

Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain,

J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V . Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain,”Science Robotics, vol. 5, no. 47, 2020

work page 2020
[4]

Rma: Rapid motor adaptation for legged robots,

A. Kumar, Z. Fu, D. Pathak, and J. Malik, “Rma: Rapid motor adaptation for legged robots,” inRobotics: Science and Systems, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Learning dynamic bipedal walking across stepping stones,

H. Duan, A. Malik, M. S. Gadde, J. Dao, A. Fern, and J. Hurst, “Learning dynamic bipedal walking across stepping stones,” in2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 6746–6752

work page 2022
[6]

Learning vision-based bipedal locomotion for challenging terrain,

H. Duan, B. Pandit, M. S. Gadde, B. Van Marum, J. Dao, C. Kim, and A. Fern, “Learning vision-based bipedal locomotion for challenging terrain,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 56–62

work page 2024
[7]

Legged locomotion in challenging terrains using egocentric vision,

A. Agarwal, A. Kumar, J. Malik, and D. Pathak, “Legged locomotion in challenging terrains using egocentric vision,” inConference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022

work page 2022
[8]

Terrain recogni- tion and contact force estimation through a sensorized paw for legged robots,

A. Vangen, T. Barnwal, J. A. Olsen, and K. Alexis, “Terrain recogni- tion and contact force estimation through a sensorized paw for legged robots,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03855, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Terrain-perception-free quadrupedal spinning locomotion on versatile terrains: Modeling, analysis, and experimental validation,

H. Zhu, D. Wang, N. Boyd, Z. Zhou, L. Ruan, A. Zhang, N. Ding, Y . Zhao, and J. Luo, “Terrain-perception-free quadrupedal spinning locomotion on versatile terrains: Modeling, analysis, and experimental validation,”Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 8, Oct. 2021

2021
[10]

Walking with terrain reconstruction: Learning to traverse risky sparse footholds,

R. Yu, Q. Wang, Y . Wang, Z. Wang, J. Wu, and Q. Zhu, “Walking with terrain reconstruction: Learning to traverse risky sparse footholds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15692, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Walking posture adaptation for legged robot navigation in confined spaces,

R. Buchanan, T. Bandyopadhyay, M. Bjelonic, L. Wellhausen, M. Hut- ter, and N. Kottege, “Walking posture adaptation for legged robot navigation in confined spaces,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2148–2155, 2019

work page 2019
[12]

Learning to walk in confined spaces using 3d representation,

T. Miki, J. Lee, L. Wellhausen, and M. Hutter, “Learning to walk in confined spaces using 3d representation,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2024

work page 2024
[13]

Dexterous legged locomotion in confined 3d spaces with reinforcement learning,

Z. Xu, A. H. Raj, X. Xiao, and P. Stone, “Dexterous legged locomotion in confined 3d spaces with reinforcement learning,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 11 474–11 480

work page 2024
[14]

Policy Distillation

A. A. Rusu, S. G. Colmenarejo, C ¸ aglar G ¨ulc ¸ehre, G. Desjardins, J. Kirkpatrick, R. Pascanu, V . Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, and R. Hadsell, “Policy distillation,”CoRR, vol. abs/1511.06295, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1923568

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[15]

Artplanner: Robust legged robot navigation in the field,

L. Wellhausen and M. Hutter, “Artplanner: Robust legged robot navigation in the field,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01420, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Global planning methods for legged robots on rough terrain,

J. Chestnutt, J. Kuffner, K. Nishiwaki, S. Kagami, K. Kaneko, M. Fukushi, K. Nagasaka, M. Inaba, and H. Inoue, “Global planning methods for legged robots on rough terrain,” inProceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1245–1252

work page 2009
[17]

Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild,

T. Miki, J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V . Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild,”Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 62, p. eabk2822, 2022

2022
[18]

Learning to perform dynamic legged manoeuvres on flipper steps: A parkour approach,

N. Rudin, D. Hoeller, L. Wellhausen, and M. Hutter, “Learning to perform dynamic legged manoeuvres on flipper steps: A parkour approach,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 6789–6796, 2022

2022
[19]

Agile but safe: Learning collision-free high-speed legged locomotion,

T. He, C. Zhang, W. Xiao, G. He, C. Liu, and G. Shi, “Agile but safe: Learning collision-free high-speed legged locomotion,” inProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2024

2024
[20]

Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots,

J. Hwangbo, J. Lee, A. Dosovitskiy, D. Bellicoso, V . Tsounis, V . Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots,”Science Robotics, vol. 4, no. 26, p. eaau5872, 2019

work page 2019
[21]

Reinforcement learning with demonstrations and guidance: A unified framework for robotic manipulation,

Y . Chebotar, K. Hausman, Y . Lu, T. Xiao, D. Kalashnikov, J. Varley, A. Irpan, P. Pastor, C. Finn, and S. Levine, “Reinforcement learning with demonstrations and guidance: A unified framework for robotic manipulation,” inProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Robot Learning, 2021, pp. 1309–1318

2021
[22]

A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning,

S. Ross, G. J. Gordon, and J. A. Bagnell, “A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 15. PMLR, 2011, pp. 627–635. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v15/ross11a.html

work page 2011
[23]

Isaac gym: High performance gpu based physics simulation for robot learning,

V . Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y . Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Mack- lin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handa, and G. State, “Isaac gym: High performance gpu based physics simulation for robot learning,” inNeurIPS 2021 Track Datasets and Benchmarks, 2021

work page 2021
[24]

Proximal policy optimization algorithms,

J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov, “Proximal policy optimization algorithms,” inProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70. PMLR, 2017, pp. 3057–3065

work page 2017
[25]

Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,

Y . Lecun, L. Bottou, Y . Bengio, and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998

work page 1998
[26]

Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate,

D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y . Bengio, “Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015

work page 2015