pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13777 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Before the Bang: Wormholes at the Dawn of the Universe

Ioannis D. Gialamas, Olga Papadoulaki, Panos Betzios, Paul Ghiringhelli

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 17:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords Euclidean wormholesno-boundary proposalquantum cosmologyinitial conditionsholographyearly universewormhole saddles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Euclidean wormholes enlarge the semiclassical initial-condition landscape for the universe beyond the no-boundary proposal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that Euclidean wormholes serve as additional contributions to the initial quantum state of the universe. This approach retains the use of Euclidean saddles to encode properties of cosmological wavefunctions but expands the range of regular geometries available for describing inflating universes. It addresses limitations in the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal by offering a richer set of possibilities. A reader would find this relevant because it connects quantum gravity ideas to concrete early-universe models in a way that respects holographic principles.

Core claim

The principal achievement is that the wormhole program enlarges the semiclassical initial-condition landscape in a physically rich manner that conforms with holographic expectations, making it increasingly relevant for early-universe model building within UV complete theories of quantum gravity.

What carries the argument

Euclidean wormholes as candidate contributions to the Universe's initial quantum state, functioning as regular saddles in the path integral that broaden the class beyond the no-boundary proposal.

Load-bearing premise

Euclidean wormholes are physically relevant saddles in the quantum gravity path integral capable of contributing to the universe's initial state.

What would settle it

Detection of primordial gravitational waves or CMB patterns that match only the no-boundary proposal predictions while excluding wormhole contributions, or vice versa.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13777 by Ioannis D. Gialamas, Olga Papadoulaki, Panos Betzios, Paul Ghiringhelli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the wineglass wormhole proposal for the birth of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic illustration of the no-boundary proposal for the birth of the Universe. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This essay discusses recent progress on Euclidean wormholes as candidate contributions to the Universe's initial quantum state. The comparison with the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal highlights both a conceptual affinity and genuine advance: wormholes retain the relevance of Euclidean-saddles as encoders of properties of cosmological wavefunctions, while they broaden the class of regular saddles that are physically relevant for inflating universes and are capable of resolving issues that plague the no-boundary proposal. The principal achievement of the wormhole program is to enlarge the semiclassical initial-condition land-scape in a way that is physically rich, conforms with Holographic expectations and as such becomes increasingly relevant for early-universe model building, within UV complete theories of quantum gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This essay discusses recent progress on Euclidean wormholes as candidate contributions to the Universe's initial quantum state. It compares this approach to the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal, highlighting both conceptual similarities and advances: wormholes broaden the class of regular semiclassical saddles that are physically relevant for inflating universes, help resolve issues in the no-boundary proposal, and enlarge the semiclassical initial-condition landscape in a manner consistent with holographic expectations, thereby becoming relevant for early-universe model building within UV-complete theories of quantum gravity.

Significance. If the perspective holds, the work is significant in that it synthesizes and advances the conceptual framework for using Euclidean wormholes in cosmological initial conditions. This could provide a richer set of physically relevant saddles compared to the no-boundary proposal, aligning with holographic principles and offering new avenues for model building in quantum gravity.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is quite dense with technical terminology; expanding the final sentence to briefly list one or two concrete examples of wormhole configurations or resolved no-boundary issues would improve accessibility without altering the essay's scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our essay, as well as for recommending minor revision. The referee correctly identifies the central advance: Euclidean wormholes enlarge the space of regular semiclassical saddles relevant for inflating cosmologies while preserving the utility of Euclidean saddles for encoding wavefunction properties and aligning with holographic expectations. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript is a qualitative essay summarizing conceptual progress on Euclidean wormholes as contributions to the initial quantum state. It contrasts them with the Hartle-Hawking proposal and states that wormholes enlarge the space of regular semiclassical saddles while remaining compatible with holographic expectations. No new quantitative derivation, wave-function computation, or stability analysis is presented; the central claim is a descriptive synthesis of how the wormhole program broadens the initial-condition landscape. No equations or fitted parameters appear that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs, and no load-bearing step relies on a self-citation chain whose validity is presupposed within the text itself. The discussion therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 971 out tokens · 33459 ms · 2026-05-14T17:46:31.873146+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347–356

    1981

  2. [2]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389–393

    1982

  3. [3]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685

    1979

  4. [4]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,JETP Lett.33(1981) 532–535

    1981

  5. [5]

    S. W. Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295. 8

    1982

  6. [6]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175–178

    1982

  7. [7]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110–1113

    1982

  8. [8]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner,Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 679

    1983

  9. [9]

    Betzios and O

    P. Betzios and O. Papadoulaki,Inflationary Cosmology from Anti-de Sitter Wormholes,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 021501, [2403.17046]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Betzios, I

    P. Betzios, I. D. Gialamas and O. Papadoulaki,Magnetic anti–de Sitter wormholes as seeds for Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 123542, [2412.03639]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    A Menagerie of Wormholes and Cosmologies in the Gravitational Path Integral

    P. Betzios, P. Ghiringhelli, I. D. Gialamas and O. Papadoulaki,A Menagerie of Wormholes and Cosmologies in the Gravitational Path Integral,2602.23432

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 2960–2975

    1983

  13. [13]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal, 2602.02682

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Antipodal correlation on the meron wormhole and a bang-crunch universe

    P. Betzios, N. Gaddam and O. Papadoulaki,Antipodal correlation on the meron wormhole and a bang-crunch universe,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 126006, [1711.03469]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology

    A. Hebecker, T. Mikhail and P. Soler,Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2018) 35, [1807.00824]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Fu and D

    Z. Fu and D. Marolf,Bag-of-gold spacetimes, Euclidean wormholes, and inflation from domain walls in AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2019) 040, [1909.02505]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from the vacuum,Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 045008, [2203.11220]. 9

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk,Accelerating Cosmology from a Holographic Wormhole,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221601, [2206.14821]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Jonas, G

    C. Jonas, G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Zoo of axionic wormholes,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 066012, [2306.11129]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, T. Hertog, R. Tielemans, J. P. van der Schaar and T. Van Riet,Axion-de Sitter wormholes,JHEP11(2023) 225, [2306.13951]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Antonini and L

    S. Antonini and L. G. C. Bariuan,Magnetic braneworlds: cosmology and wormholes, JHEP09(2024) 070, [2405.18465]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Maloney, V

    A. Maloney, V. Meruliya and M. Van Raamsdonk,Ordinary wormholes,2503.12227

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Lavrelashvili and J.-L

    G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Nucleating an Inflationary Universe: Euclidean Wormholes and their No-Boundary Limit,2603.11003

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Marolf and J

    D. Marolf and J. E. Santos,AdS Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 224002, [2101.08875]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Betzios,A microscopic normal matrix model for (A)dS 2,JHEP01(2026) 008, [2505.23891]

    P. Betzios,A microscopic normal matrix model for (A)dS 2,JHEP01(2026) 008, [2505.23891]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala, String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1–155, [2303.04819]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland, 2004.06738

    work page arXiv 2004

  29. [29]

    Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson

    D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, G. F. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson,JHEP12(2013) 089, [1307.3536]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 703–706, [0710.3755]. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008