pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.23432 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-26 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Menagerie of Wormholes and Cosmologies in the Gravitational Path Integral

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords gravitational path integralEuclidean wormholesAdS boundariesFLRW cosmologiesphase transitionsinflationEinstein-Scalar-Maxwell
0
0 comments X

The pith

Euclidean wormholes and oscillatory saddles in AdS gravity continue to Lorentzian FLRW cosmologies, some with early inflation, and can dominate the path integral.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines multiple Euclidean solutions in the gravitational path integral for Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell theories with anti-de Sitter boundaries. These include single-boundary geometries, standard wormholes, wineglass wormholes, and saddles with repeated oscillations. The solutions undergo phase transitions as parameters vary, and the wormhole geometries continue analytically to real-time expanding universes. Some continued spacetimes feature an early inflationary phase. The authors identify when these saddles lead the path integral and extract relative probabilities for different cosmological histories from their actions.

Core claim

In Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models with asymptotic AdS boundaries, the gravitational path integral supports single-boundary solutions together with usual and wineglass wormholes as well as quasi-oscillatory saddles. Lifting flat directions in the potential keeps the number of oscillations finite. The Euclidean wormhole backgrounds continue to Lorentzian FLRW universes, some containing an early inflationary epoch. Under appropriate conditions these saddles dominate the path integral, allowing estimates of probability ratios among distinct cosmological outcomes.

What carries the argument

Euclidean saddles consisting of wormholes and quasi-oscillatory solutions, which serve as the dominant contributions to the gravitational path integral and permit analytic continuation to Lorentzian FLRW cosmologies.

If this is right

  • Phase transitions occur among single-boundary, wormhole, and oscillatory solutions when parameters of the model are varied.
  • Wormhole backgrounds continue to FLRW cosmologies that can include an early period of inflation.
  • Dominance of these saddles fixes the leading probabilities for different cosmological histories.
  • Lifting flat directions in the scalar potential bounds the number of oscillations that appear in the saddles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Path-integral dominance by such saddles could select particular early-universe histories over others in quantum gravity.
  • Similar Euclidean constructions might be explored in different dimensions or with modified boundary conditions to generate further cosmological predictions.
  • The inflationary phases in the continued metrics could leave observable traces if these geometries are relevant to realistic cosmologies.

Load-bearing premise

The identified saddles must be the lowest-action ones that actually dominate the path integral for the chosen Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models and AdS boundary conditions.

What would settle it

A calculation that finds another Euclidean geometry with strictly lower action than the wormhole or oscillatory saddles in the same model would show that the reported solutions are not dominant.

read the original abstract

We analyse a variety of Euclidean saddles in the gravitational path integral, with asymptotic AdS boundary conditions, in a class of Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models. These include single boundary solutions, usual and wineglass wormholes, as well as more exotic (quasi)-oscillatory saddles. Our construction shows how an unbound number of oscillations gets tamed, when flat directions of the potential get lifted. We find several interesting phase transitions between these solutions. The Euclidean wormhole backgrounds can be analytically continued to Lorentzian FLRW universes. Some of them contain an early period of inflation. We delineate the conditions under which they can be the dominant saddles in the gravitational path integral and use them to estimate ratios of probabilities for different cosmological outcomes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes Euclidean saddles in the gravitational path integral for a class of Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models with asymptotic AdS boundaries. It constructs single-boundary solutions, usual and wineglass wormholes, and quasi-oscillatory saddles, showing how an unbound number of oscillations is tamed by lifting flat directions in the scalar potential. The work identifies phase transitions among these solutions, analytically continues the wormhole backgrounds to Lorentzian FLRW universes (some featuring early inflation), delineates conditions for path-integral dominance, and uses the dominant saddles to estimate probability ratios for different cosmological outcomes.

Significance. If the explicit constructions, phase-transition analysis, and dominance criteria are rigorously derived and verified, the results would offer concrete examples of how exotic Euclidean saddles can contribute to the gravitational path integral and connect to realistic Lorentzian cosmologies. The mechanism for taming oscillations and the probability estimates for inflationary versus non-inflationary outcomes would be of interest to the AdS/CFT and quantum cosmology communities. The abstract alone does not allow confirmation of these strengths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their summary of our manuscript and for acknowledging the potential significance of our results for the AdS/CFT and quantum cosmology communities. We note that the referee's recommendation is uncertain, presumably because only the abstract was available for review. The full manuscript contains the explicit constructions, derivations, and verifications. We respond to the referee's assessment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: If the explicit constructions, phase-transition analysis, and dominance criteria are rigorously derived and verified, the results would offer concrete examples of how exotic Euclidean saddles can contribute to the gravitational path integral and connect to realistic Lorentzian cosmologies. The mechanism for taming oscillations and the probability estimates for inflationary versus non-inflationary outcomes would be of interest to the AdS/CFT and quantum cosmology communities.

    Authors: We confirm that the full manuscript provides rigorous derivations and verifications of these elements. Specifically, we construct the Euclidean saddles explicitly, including the wineglass wormholes and quasi-oscillatory configurations, and show how lifting flat potential directions controls the oscillations. Phase transitions are identified and analyzed, with conditions for path-integral dominance delineated. Analytic continuations to FLRW universes with early inflation are presented, and probability ratios are estimated based on the dominant saddles. These results are supported by detailed calculations in the paper. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected from available text

full rationale

The abstract describes direct constructions of Euclidean saddles (single-boundary, wormholes, oscillatory) by solving the equations of motion in a class of Einstein-Scalar-Maxwell models with AdS boundaries, followed by phase transitions and analytic continuation to Lorentzian FLRW universes. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or derivation steps are provided that reduce any claimed prediction or result to its own inputs by construction. The analysis is presented as model-based and self-contained, with no load-bearing steps that collapse to renaming, fitting, or prior self-referential theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Due to abstract-only access, the ledger reflects standard assumptions in Euclidean quantum gravity rather than specific details from the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • parameters in the scalar potential
    The class of models allows choices for the potential, including flat directions that are lifted.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Asymptotic AdS boundary conditions apply to the gravitational path integral in these models.
    Common in AdS/CFT contexts but taken as given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5408 in / 1416 out tokens · 49628 ms · 2026-05-15T18:36:37.867933+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Birth of Inflationary Universes via Wineglass Wormholes and their No-Boundary Relatives

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Wineglass wormholes with a local maximum in the scale factor mediate the birth of inflationary spacetimes and split into background plus no-boundary geometries at small axionic or magnetic charge.

  2. Before the Bang: Wormholes at the Dawn of the Universe

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Euclidean wormholes broaden the landscape of regular semiclassical initial conditions for inflating universes, offering conceptual and practical advantages over the no-boundary proposal in quantum gravity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page,Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space, Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

  2. [2]

    J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz,Wormholes in AdS,JHEP02(2004) 053, [hep-th/0401024]

  3. [3]

    Euclidean Wormholes and Holography

    P. Betzios, E. Kiritsis and O. Papadoulaki,Euclidean Wormholes and Holography,JHEP06 (2019) 042, [arXiv:1903.05658]

  4. [4]

    Betzios, E

    P. Betzios, E. Kiritsis and O. Papadoulaki,Interacting systems and wormholes,JHEP02 (2022) 126, [arXiv:2110.14655]

  5. [5]

    Cosmology from confinement?,

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [arXiv:2102.05057]

  6. [6]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from the vacuum, Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 045008, [arXiv:2203.11220]

  7. [7]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk,Accelerating Cosmology from a Holographic Wormhole,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221601, [arXiv:2206.14821]

  8. [8]

    Betzios and O

    P. Betzios and O. Papadoulaki,Wilson loops and wormholes,JHEP03(2024) 066, [arXiv:2311.09289]

  9. [9]

    Maloney, V

    A. Maloney, V. Meruliya and M. Van Raamsdonk,Ordinary wormholes,arXiv:2503.12227. – 56 –

  10. [10]

    Menagerie of Euclidean constructions for 3D holographic cosmologies

    M. Van Raamsdonk and A. Vilar L´ opez,An AS 2 Menagerie,arXiv:2601.10906

  11. [11]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Baby Universes in AdS 3,arXiv:2512.02098

  12. [12]

    Betzios and O

    P. Betzios and O. Papadoulaki,Inflationary Cosmology from Anti-de Sitter Wormholes, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 021501, [arXiv:2403.17046]

  13. [13]

    Betzios, I

    P. Betzios, I. D. Gialamas and O. Papadoulaki,Magnetic anti–de Sitter wormholes as seeds for Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 123542, [arXiv:2412.03639]

  14. [14]

    S. P. De Alwis, F. Muia, V. Pasquarella and F. Quevedo,Quantum Transitions Between Minkowski and de Sitter Spacetimes,Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000069, [arXiv:1909.01975]

  15. [15]

    Fu and D

    Z. Fu and D. Marolf,Bag-of-gold spacetimes, Euclidean wormholes, and inflation from domain walls in AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2019) 040, [arXiv:1909.02505]

  16. [16]

    Inflation in AdS/CFT

    B. Freivogel, V. E. Hubeny, A. Maloney, R. C. Myers, M. Rangamani and S. Shenker, Inflation in AdS/CFT,JHEP03(2006) 007, [hep-th/0510046]

  17. [17]

    G. V. Lavrelashvili, V. A. Rubakov and P. G. Tinyakov,Loss of Quantum Coherence Due to Topological Changes: A Toy Model,Mod. Phys. Lett. A3(1988) 1231–1242

  18. [18]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960–2975

  19. [19]

    Lehners,Review of the no-boundary wave function,Phys

    J.-L. Lehners,Review of the no-boundary wave function,Phys. Rept.1022(2023) 1–82, [arXiv:2303.08802]

  20. [20]

    Maldacena,Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation, arXiv:2403.10510

    J. Maldacena,Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation, arXiv:2403.10510

  21. [21]

    Betzios, P

    P. Betzios, P. Ghiringhelli, I. D. Gialamas and O. Papadoulaki, To appear

  22. [22]

    Antipodal correlation on the meron wormhole and a bang-crunch universe

    P. Betzios, N. Gaddam and O. Papadoulaki,Antipodal correlation on the meron wormhole and a bang-crunch universe,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 126006, [arXiv:1711.03469]

  23. [23]

    Coleman, J

    S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle, T. Piran and S. Weinberg,Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1991, 10.1142/1190

  24. [24]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,arXiv:2602.02682

  25. [25]

    Banks,Old Ideas for New Physicists III: String Theory Parameters are NOT Vacuum Expectation Values,arXiv:2501.17697

    T. Banks,Old Ideas for New Physicists III: String Theory Parameters are NOT Vacuum Expectation Values,arXiv:2501.17697

  26. [26]

    Sen,Are Moduli Vacuum Expectation Values or Parameters?,arXiv:2502.07883

    A. Sen,Are Moduli Vacuum Expectation Values or Parameters?,arXiv:2502.07883

  27. [27]

    Betzios, N

    P. Betzios, N. Gaddam and O. Papadoulaki,Baby universes born from the void,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31(2022) 2242021, [arXiv:2204.01764]

  28. [28]

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 703–706, [arXiv:0710.3755]

  29. [29]

    A. O. Barvinsky, A. Y. Kamenshchik and A. A. Starobinsky,Inflation scenario via the Standard Model Higgs boson and LHC,JCAP11(2008) 021, [arXiv:0809.2104]

  30. [30]

    Running Inflation in the Standard Model

    A. De Simone, M. P. Hertzberg and F. Wilczek,Running Inflation in the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B678(2009) 1–8, [arXiv:0812.4946]

  31. [31]

    J. L. F. Barbon and J. R. Espinosa,On the Naturalness of Higgs Inflation,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 081302, [arXiv:0903.0355]. – 57 –

  32. [32]

    A. O. Barvinsky, A. Y. Kamenshchik, C. Kiefer, A. A. Starobinsky and C. Steinwachs, Asymptotic freedom in inflationary cosmology with a non-minimally coupled Higgs field, JCAP12(2009) 003, [arXiv:0904.1698]

  33. [33]

    A. O. Barvinsky, A. Y. Kamenshchik, C. Kiefer, A. A. Starobinsky and C. F. Steinwachs, Higgs boson, renormalization group, and naturalness in cosmology,Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2219, [arXiv:0910.1041]

  34. [34]

    Higgs inflation: consistency and generalisations

    F. Bezrukov, A. Magnin, M. Shaposhnikov and S. Sibiryakov,Higgs inflation: consistency and generalisations,JHEP01(2011) 016, [arXiv:1008.5157]

  35. [35]

    Living beyond the edge: Higgs inflation and vacuum metastability

    F. Bezrukov, J. Rubio and M. Shaposhnikov,Living beyond the edge: Higgs inflation and vacuum metastability,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 083512, [arXiv:1412.3811]

  36. [36]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal,Has ACT measured radiative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 103544, [arXiv:2504.06002]

  37. [37]

    doi:10.1017/CBO9780511565045

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985, 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

  38. [38]

    Antonini and L

    S. Antonini and L. G. C. Bariuan,Magnetic braneworlds: cosmology and wormholes,JHEP 09(2024) 070, [arXiv:2405.18465]

  39. [39]

    Marolf and J

    D. Marolf and J. E. Santos,AdS Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 224002, [arXiv:2101.08875]

  40. [40]

    Lan and Y.-S

    Q.-Y. Lan and Y.-S. Piao,Prepare inflationary universe via the Euclidean charged wormhole, arXiv:2411.13844

  41. [41]

    Rey,Space-time Wormholes With Yang-Mills Fields,Nucl

    S.-J. Rey,Space-time Wormholes With Yang-Mills Fields,Nucl. Phys. B336(1990) 146–156

  42. [42]

    S. W. Hawking and S. F. Ross,Duality between electric and magnetic black holes,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 5865–5876, [hep-th/9504019]

  43. [43]

    E. Witten,SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200, 7, 2003.hep-th/0307041

  44. [44]

    Lecture Notes on Holographic Renormalization

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849–5876, [hep-th/0209067]

  45. [45]

    Jonas, G

    C. Jonas, G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Zoo of axionic wormholes,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 066012, [arXiv:2306.11129]

  46. [46]

    J. J. Halliwell and R. C. Myers,Multiple Sphere Configurations in the Path Integral Representation of the Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D40(1989) 4011

  47. [47]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, T. Hertog, R. Tielemans, J. P. van der Schaar and T. Van Riet, Axion-de Sitter wormholes,JHEP11(2023) 225, [arXiv:2306.13951]

  48. [48]

    Anninos and D.M

    D. Anninos and D. M. Hofman,Infrared Realization of dS 2 in AdS2,Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 085003, [arXiv:1703.04622]

  49. [49]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 197–201

  50. [50]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,Annals Phys.144(1982) 249. – 58 –

  51. [51]

    Petkou and K

    A. Petkou and K. Skenderis,A non-renormalization theorem for conformal anomalies, Nuclear Physics B561(Nov., 1999) 100–116

  52. [52]

    Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT

    I. Papadimitriou,Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT,JHEP05(2007) 075, [hep-th/0703152]. [53]Planckcollaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06211]. [54]BICEP, Keckcollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Improved Constraints ...

  53. [53]

    Blommaert, J

    A. Blommaert, J. Kudler-Flam and E. Y. Urbach,Absolute entropy and the observer’s no-boundary state,JHEP11(2025) 113, [arXiv:2505.14771]

  54. [54]

    Betzios, N

    P. Betzios, N. Gaddam and O. Papadoulaki,Black hole — wormhole transitions in two dimensional string theory,JHEP05(2024) 132, [arXiv:2312.02257]

  55. [55]

    Towards a holographic description of closed universes,

    H. Liu,Towards a holographic description of closed universes,arXiv:2509.14327

  56. [56]

    The baby universe is fine and the CFT knows it: on holography for closed universes,

    S. Antonini, P. Rath, M. Sasieta, B. Swingle and A. Vilar L´ opez,The baby universe is fine and the CFT knows it: on holography for closed universes,JHEP12(2025) 159, [arXiv:2507.10649]

  57. [57]

    Harlow,Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,arXiv:2602.03835

    D. Harlow,Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,arXiv:2602.03835

  58. [58]

    Nomura and T

    Y. Nomura and T. Ugajin,Physical Predictions in Closed Quantum Gravity, arXiv:2602.13387

  59. [59]

    Zhao,”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,arXiv:2602.05939

    Y. Zhao,”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,arXiv:2602.05939

  60. [60]

    Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology

    A. Hebecker, T. Mikhail and P. Soler,Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2018) 35, [arXiv:1807.00824]

  61. [61]

    Betzios,A microscopic normal matrix model for (A)dS 2,JHEP01(2026) 008, [arXiv:2505.23891]

    P. Betzios,A microscopic normal matrix model for (A)dS 2,JHEP01(2026) 008, [arXiv:2505.23891]

  62. [62]

    AbdusSalam, C

    S. AbdusSalam, C. Hughes, F. Quevedo and A. Schachner,Coexisting flux string vacua from numerical K¨ ahler moduli stabilisation,JHEP01(2026) 056, [arXiv:2507.00615]. – 59 –