pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13920 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

No-go theorem for spontaneous vectorization

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords spontaneous vectorizationno-go theoremvector-tensor theoriesblack hole hairghost instabilitiesKerr black holesgeneral relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spontaneous vectorization cannot occur on hairless black holes without ghost or gradient instabilities

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that in generalized vector-tensor theories a vector field cannot develop a negative effective mass squared to trigger spontaneous hair growth if the initial state is a hairless black hole. This holds for essentially all stationary and axisymmetric spacetimes of interest in general relativity. The proof shows that negative mass squared must be accompanied by ghost- or gradient-type instabilities. Demanding the absence of instabilities produces bounds on the coupling constants in terms of the black hole parameters. For Kerr black holes this implies instability above a critical spin value.

Core claim

We demonstrate that spontaneous vectorization is not possible if the initial state is a hairless black hole. The appearance of a negative effective mass squared for the vector field must necessarily be accompanied by ghost- or gradient-type instabilities. This result applies to essentially all stationary and axisymmetric solutions of interest in general relativity and translates into interesting bounds on the coupling constants as functions of the black hole parameters, including a critical spin value above which a Kerr black hole becomes unstable.

What carries the argument

The no-go theorem that negative effective mass squared for the vector field implies ghost or gradient instabilities in stationary axisymmetric spacetimes

If this is right

  • Bounds on coupling constants are set by the black hole parameters to avoid instabilities.
  • A Kerr black hole becomes unstable above a critical spin value.
  • Spontaneous vectorization cannot produce hairy black holes from hairless initial states without instabilities.
  • The result covers essentially all stationary and axisymmetric black hole solutions in general relativity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hairy black holes in these theories, if they exist, must form from initial states that already contain vector fields rather than through spontaneous growth.
  • The critical spin threshold for Kerr instability offers a concrete limit that could be checked against astrophysical observations of spinning black holes.
  • The theorem leaves open whether spontaneous vectorization could occur in non-stationary or non-axisymmetric cases.

Load-bearing premise

The spacetime is stationary and axisymmetric with an initial hairless black hole background.

What would settle it

Discovery of a stable vector-haired black hole that grows from a hairless initial state in a vector-tensor theory with negative effective mass squared would contradict the theorem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13920 by Aofei Sang, Hsu-Wen Chiang, Sebastian Garcia-Saenz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Stability region for a Kerr black hole of mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: B. Accelerated black hole spacetime As a second example we consider the so-called C￾metric solution of GR [65]. It describes a pair of accelerating black holes connected by a line defect, representing a simple set-up to study the effects of acceleration on black hole horizons. For us, it serves as a toy model to assess how acceleration may affect black hole stability in theories with non-minimally coupled … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Stability region for a Kerr-Newman black hole. Graphs show instability regions for the couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Stability region for an extremal Kerr-Newman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Stability region for an accelerated black hole of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Stability region for a Schwarzschild-(A)dS black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stability region for an extremal Kerr-(A)dS black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Stability region for a Taub-NUT black hole of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Generalized vector-tensor theories of gravity have drawn attention for admitting hairy black hole solutions, thereby circumventing the standard no-hair theorems. It remains an open question, however, how such black holes may form starting from reasonable initial conditions. It has been suggested that vector hair may grow spontaneously as a result of the field developing a negative effective mass squared $-$ the so-called spontaneous vectorization mechanism. We demonstrate that this is not possible if the initial state is a hairless black hole, a result that applies to essentially all stationary and axisymmetric solutions of interest in general relativity. More precisely, we prove that the appearance of a negative effective mass squared for the vector field must necessarily be accompanied by ghost- or gradient-type instabilities. Demanding the absence of such instabilities translates into interesting bounds on the coupling constants of the theory as functions of the black hole parameters. In particular, we discover that a Kerr black hole may become unstable when the spin increases above a certain critical value.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to prove a no-go theorem for spontaneous vectorization in generalized vector-tensor theories of gravity. It demonstrates that, on any stationary and axisymmetric hairless black-hole background satisfying the vacuum GR equations, a negative effective mass squared for the vector field necessarily induces ghost- or gradient-type instabilities in the quadratic action for linear perturbations. This precludes spontaneous growth of vector hair from such initial states and yields bounds on the coupling functions, including a critical spin value above which a Kerr black hole becomes unstable.

Significance. If the central result holds, it is significant for modified gravity and black-hole physics. The theorem rules out spontaneous vectorization as a formation channel for hairy solutions on standard GR backgrounds, supplying parameter-free constraints on vector-tensor models that aim to evade no-hair theorems. The proof rests on standard linear stability analysis around vacuum solutions and applies broadly to stationary axisymmetric spacetimes of interest; the spin-dependent instability for Kerr provides a concrete, testable prediction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The provided summary correctly captures the central no-go theorem: on stationary axisymmetric vacuum GR backgrounds, a negative effective mass squared for the vector field in generalized vector-tensor theories necessarily induces ghost or gradient instabilities, thereby ruling out spontaneous vectorization as a formation mechanism and yielding spin-dependent bounds on the couplings.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the no-go theorem

full rationale

The paper derives a no-go result by expanding the generalized vector-tensor action to quadratic order around a stationary axisymmetric vacuum GR black-hole background, extracting the effective mass-squared term for the vector perturbation from the coupling functions, and demonstrating that its negativity forces at least one kinetic or gradient coefficient in the quadratic action to flip sign. All steps follow directly from the explicit form of the action, the background equations, and the stated assumptions (stationary axisymmetric metric, standard vector kinetic structure); no parameter is fitted and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The theorem is therefore self-contained under its stated premises and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theorem rests on standard assumptions of general relativity without introducing new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spacetime is stationary and axisymmetric
    Invoked to restrict to solutions of interest in general relativity.
  • domain assumption Initial state is a hairless black hole
    Central premise for the no-go result on spontaneous vectorization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5465 in / 1190 out tokens · 36475 ms · 2026-05-15T02:58:24.812454+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Nonexistence of baryon number for static black holes, Phys. Rev. D5, 1239 (1972)

  2. [2]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Nonexistence of baryon number for black holes. ii, Phys. Rev. D5, 2403 (1972)

  3. [3]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Novel ‘‘no-scalar-hair’’ theorem for black holes, Phys. Rev. D51, R6608 (1995)

  4. [4]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Black holes in scalar- tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 081103 (2012), arXiv:1109.6324 [gr-qc]

  5. [5]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in generalized scalar-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 251102 (2014), arXiv:1312.3622 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in gen- eralized scalar-tensor gravity: An explicit example, Phys. Rev. D90, 124063 (2014), arXiv:1408.1698 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories

    G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos, and P. Kanti, Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solu- tions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 131102 (2018), arXiv:1711.03390 [hep-th]

  8. [8]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Nonperturba- tive strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2220 (1993)

  9. [9]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, and J. A. Font, Spontaneous Scalarization of Charged Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 101102 (2018), arXiv:1806.05190 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    A Stueckelberg Extension of the Standard Model

    B. Kors and P. Nath, A Stueckelberg extension of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B586, 366 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0402047

  11. [11]

    S. A. Abel, M. D. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze, and A. Ringwald, Kinetic Mixing of the Photon with Hidden U(1)s in String Phenomenology, JHEP07, 124, arXiv:0803.1449 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    Naturally Light Hidden Photons in LARGE Volume String Compactifications

    M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ring- wald, Naturally Light Hidden Photons in LARGE Volume String Compactifications, JHEP11, 027, arXiv:0909.0515 [hep-ph]

  13. [13]

    LHC Signals for a SuperUnified Theory of Dark Matter

    N. Arkani-Hamed and N. Weiner, LHC Signals for a SuperUnified Theory of Dark Matter, JHEP12, 104, arXiv:0810.0714 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    A. E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark Light, Dark Mat- ter and the Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 84, 103501 (2011), arXiv:1105.2812 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    WISPy Cold Dark Matter

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP06, 013, arXiv:1201.5902 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Cosmology in generalized Proca theories

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Muko- hyama, S. Tsujikawa, and Y.-l. Zhang, Cosmol- ogy in generalized Proca theories, JCAP06, 048, arXiv:1603.05806 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Observational constraints on generalized Proca theories

    A. de Felice, L. Heisenberg, and S. Tsujikawa, Obser- vational constraints on generalized Proca theories, Phys. Rev. D95, 123540 (2017), arXiv:1703.09573 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    Heisenberg and H

    L. Heisenberg and H. Villarrubia-Rojo, Proca in the sky, JCAP03, 032, arXiv:2010.00513 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [19]

    De Felice, C.-Q

    A. De Felice, C.-Q. Geng, M. C. Pookkillath, and L. Yin, Reducing theH 0 tension with general- ized Proca theory, JCAP08, 038, arXiv:2002.06782 [astro-ph.CO]

  20. [20]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Heisenberg, and V. Pozsgay, Cosmology of Extended Proca-Nuevo, JCAP03, 053, arXiv:2110.14327 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Chiang, C

    H.-W. Chiang, C. de Rham, S. Garcia-Saenz, and X. Zhou, Cosmological tensions in Proca-Nuevo the- ory, (2025), arXiv:2511.21071 [hep-th]

  22. [22]

    Black Holes and Abelian Symmetry Breaking

    J. Chagoya, G. Niz, and G. Tasinato, Black Holes and Abelian Symmetry Breaking, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 175007 (2016), arXiv:1602.08697 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    Solutions in the generalized Proca theory with the nonminimal coupling to the Einstein tensor

    M. Minamitsuji, Solutions in the generalized Proca theory with the nonminimal coupling to the Ein- stein tensor, Phys. Rev. D94, 084039 (2016), arXiv:1607.06278 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Static and rotating solutions for Vector-Galileon theories

    A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, J. Oliva, and M. Ri- naldi, Static and rotating solutions for Vector- 10 Galileon theories, Phys. Rev. D94, 104039 (2016), arXiv:1609.03430 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Black holes and solitons in an extended Proca theory

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and M. Hassaine, Black holes and solitons in an extended Proca theory, JHEP05, 114, arXiv:1703.07676 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Black holes in vector-tensor theories

    L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsu- jikawa, Black holes in vector-tensor theories, JCAP 08, 024, arXiv:1706.05115 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    Hairy black-hole solutions in generalized Proca theories

    L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsu- jikawa, Hairy black-hole solutions in generalized Proca theories, Phys. Rev. D96, 084049 (2017), arXiv:1705.09662 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsujikawa, Black holes in quartic-order beyond-generalized Proca theories, Phys. Lett. B782, 541 (2018), arXiv:1803.06335 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    C.-Y. Chen, A. De Felice, S. Tsujikawa, and T. Sano, Vector Horndeski black holes in nonlinear elec- trodynamics, Phys. Rev. D113, 024027 (2026), arXiv:2509.23134 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Stationary Einstein-vector-Gauss-Bonnet black holes

    B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Stationary Einstein- vector-Gauss-Bonnet black holes, (2026), arXiv:2604.04568 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, Exact analytic rotating black-hole solutions with primary hair, (2026), arXiv:2601.21163 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Spontaneous growth of vector fields in gravity, Phys. Rev. D96, 064009 (2017), arXiv:1706.01056 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Spontaneous growth of gauge fields in gravity through the Higgs mechanism, Phys. Rev. D98, 044013 (2018), arXiv:1804.03158 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Electromagnetism and hidden vector fields in modified gravity theories: spontaneous and induced vectorization

    L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, and L. Gualtieri, Electro- magnetism and hidden vector fields in modified grav- ity theories: spontaneous and induced vectorization, Phys. Rev. D99, 044038 (2019), arXiv:1901.02461 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Minamitsuji, Spontaneous vectorization in the presence of vector field coupling to matter, Phys

    M. Minamitsuji, Spontaneous vectorization in the presence of vector field coupling to matter, Phys. Rev. D101, 104044 (2020), arXiv:2003.11885 [gr- qc]

  36. [36]

    Garcia-Saenz, A

    S. Garcia-Saenz, A. Held, and J. Zhang, Destabi- lization of Black Holes and Stars by Generalized Proca Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 131104 (2021), arXiv:2104.08049 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    H. O. Silva, A. Coates, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, and T. P. Sotiriou, Ghost of vector fields in com- pact stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 024046 (2022), arXiv:2110.04594 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    E. S. Demirbo˘ ga, A. Coates, and F. M. Ra- mazano˘ glu, Instability of vectorized stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 024057 (2022), arXiv:2112.04269 [gr- qc]

  39. [39]

    Pizzuti and A

    L. Pizzuti and A. M. Pombo, The spooky ghost of vectorization, Phys. Dark Univ.43, 101427 (2024), arXiv:2310.18399 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Hod, Marginally stable Schwarzschild-black-hole- non-minimally-coupled-Proca-field bound-state con- figurations, Phys

    S. Hod, Marginally stable Schwarzschild-black-hole- non-minimally-coupled-Proca-field bound-state con- figurations, Phys. Rev. D111, 124034 (2025), arXiv:2506.19849 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Chiang, S

    H.-W. Chiang, S. Garcia-Saenz, and A. Sang, Black hole destabilization via trapped quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D112, 024017 (2025), arXiv:2504.04779 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Clough, T

    K. Clough, T. Helfer, H. Witek, and E. Berti, Ghost Instabilities in Self-Interacting Vector Fields: The Problem with Proca Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 151102 (2022), arXiv:2204.10868 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    Coates and F

    A. Coates and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Coordi- nate Singularities of Self-Interacting Vector Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 021401 (2023), arXiv:2211.08027 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Coates and F

    A. Coates and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Intrinsic Pathol- ogy of Self-Interacting Vector Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 151103 (2022), arXiv:2205.07784 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    Aoki and M

    K. Aoki and M. Minamitsuji, Resolving the patholo- gies of self-interacting Proca fields: A case study of Proca stars, Phys. Rev. D106, 084022 (2022), arXiv:2206.14320 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    K. ˙I. ¨Unl¨ ut¨ urk, A. Coates, and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Loss of hyperbolicity and tachyons in generalized Proca theories, Phys. Rev. D108, 044022 (2023), arXiv:2306.03554 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    M. E. Rubio, G. Lara, M. Bezares, M. Crisostomi, and E. Barausse, Fixing the dynamical evolution of self-interacting vector fields, Phys. Rev. D110, 063015 (2024), arXiv:2407.08774 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    G. W. Horndeski, Conservation of Charge and the Einstein-Maxwell Field Equations, J. Math. Phys. 17, 1980 (1976)

  49. [49]

    Garcia-Saenz, A

    S. Garcia-Saenz, A. Held, and J. Zhang, Schwarzschild quasi-normal modes of non- minimally coupled vector fields, JHEP05, 139, arXiv:2202.07131 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Cosmic Acceleration from Abelian Symmetry Breaking

    G. Tasinato, Cosmic Acceleration from Abelian Symmetry Breaking, JHEP04, 067, arXiv:1402.6450 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Heisenberg, Generalization of the Proca Action, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

    L. Heisenberg, Generalization of the Proca Action, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

  52. [52]

    Hamiltonian vs stability and application to Horndeski theory

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, G. Esposito-Far` ese, and A. Leh´ ebel, Hamiltonian unboundedness vs sta- bility with an application to Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D98, 104050 (2018), arXiv:1803.11444 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, An Approach to grav- itational radiation by a method of spin coefficients, J. Math. Phys.3, 566 (1962)

  54. [54]

    Astorino, Most general type-D black hole and the accelerating Reissner-Nordstrom-NUT- (A)dS solution, Phys

    M. Astorino, Most general type-D black hole and the accelerating Reissner-Nordstrom-NUT- (A)dS solution, Phys. Rev. D110, 104054 (2024), arXiv:2404.06551 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    J. F. Plebanski and M. Demianski, Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity, Annals Phys.98, 98 (1976)

  56. [56]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky, A New look at the Plebanski-Demianski family of solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 335 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511091

  57. [57]

    Nakajima, Y

    H. Nakajima, Y. Guo, and W. Lin, A generalized Pleba´ nski-Demia´ nski metric for non-vacuum sta- tionary axisymmetric type D spacetime, Annals of Physics478, 170030 (2025)

  58. [58]

    P. T. Chrusciel, J. Lopes Costa, and M. Heusler, Sta- tionary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond, Living Rev. Rel.15, 7 (2012), arXiv:1205.6112 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Stability of Horndeski vector-tensor interactions

    J. Beltran Jimenez, R. Durrer, L. Heisenberg, and 11 M. Thorsrud, Stability of Horndeski vector-tensor interactions, JCAP10, 064, arXiv:1308.1867 [hep- th]

  60. [60]

    Black Hole Pulsar

    J. Levin, D. J. D’Orazio, and S. Garcia-Saenz, Black Hole Pulsar, Phys. Rev. D98, 123002 (2018), arXiv:1808.07887 [astro-ph.HE]

  61. [61]

    Y. Gong, Z. Cao, H. Gao, and B. Zhang, On neu- tralization of charged black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488, 2722 (2019), arXiv:1907.05239 [gr- qc]

  62. [62]

    Z. G. Dai, Inspiral of a Spinning Black Hole–Magnetized Neutron Star Binary: Increasing Charge and Electromagnetic Emission, Astro- phys. J. Lett.873, L13 (2019), arXiv:1902.07939 [astro-ph.HE]

  63. [63]

    Chen and Z

    K. Chen and Z. G. Dai, Charging and Electro- magnetic Radiation during the Inspiral of a Black Hole–Neutron Star Binary, Astrophys. J.909, 4 (2021)

  64. [64]

    Adari, R

    P. Adari, R. Berens, and J. Levin, Charging up boosted black holes, Phys. Rev. D107, 044055 (2023), arXiv:2111.15027 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    Ehlers and W

    J. Ehlers and W. Kundt, Exact solutions of the grav- itational field equations, inGravitation: An Intro- duction to Current Research, edited by L. Witten (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962) pp. 49–101

  66. [66]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky, Accelerating and rotating black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 3467 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0507021

  67. [67]

    J. B. Griffiths, P. Krtous, and J. Podolsky, Inter- preting the C-metric, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 6745 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0609056

  68. [68]

    Holographic superconductors in the Born-Infeld electrodynamics

    J. Jing and S. Chen, Holographic superconductors in the Born-Infeld electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B686, 68 (2010), arXiv:1001.4227 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    J. Jing, L. Wang, Q. Pan, and S. Chen, Holo- graphic Superconductors in Gauss-Bonnet gravity with Born-Infeld electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D83, 066010 (2011), arXiv:1012.0644 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    Bonanno and S

    A. Bonanno and S. Silveravalle, Ghost-induced phase transition in the final stages of black hole evaporation, (2025), arXiv:2505.05027 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003)

  72. [72]

    A. H. Taub, Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions, Annals Math.53, 472 (1951)

  73. [73]

    Newman, L

    E. Newman, L. Tamburino, and T. Unti, Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric, J. Math. Phys.4, 915 (1963)

  74. [74]

    Ortin,Gravity and Strings, 2nd ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    T. Ortin,Gravity and Strings, 2nd ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015)