arxiv: 2605.14210 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

Towards Fine-Grained and Verifiable Concept Bottleneck Models

Yingying Fang , Haijie Xu , Shuang Wu , Mariathasan Anish , Guang Yang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI

keywords conceptcbmsconceptsbottleneckevidencefine-grainedframeworkmodels

0 comments

The pith

A verifiable CBM framework grounds concepts in localized image patches, achieving comparable accuracy to standard CBMs on medical benchmarks while enabling direct inspection of concept correctness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard AI models for medical images are hard to trust because they hide their reasoning. Concept Bottleneck Models try to fix this by forcing the model to first predict human-understandable ideas like 'has calcification' before making a diagnosis. The new approach adds a step that forces each idea to be linked to a specific small area in the image. This lets doctors look at the highlighted patch and confirm the model really saw the right thing instead of guessing from background noise. Experiments claim the model still predicts as well as older versions but now supports verification of both presence and accuracy of each concept.

Core claim

Experiments on medical imaging benchmarks show that our learned concept space is information-complete and achieves predictive performance comparable to standard CBMs, while substantially improving transparency. Unlike post-hoc attribution methods, our framework validates both the presence and correctness of concept representations.

Load-bearing premise

That localizing each concept to visual evidence regions will reliably prevent the model from learning spurious correlations and that human inspection of these regions will correctly verify intended concepts without additional validation data or metrics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14210 by Guang Yang, Haijie Xu, Mariathasan Anish, Shuang Wu, Yingying Fang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Framework of GenCBM. Left: We learn generative features by training a StyleGAN generator along with a latent inversion encoder. Right top: The coarseto-fine generative features are used for concept learning in the CBM stage. Right bottom: We generate counterfactuals by perturbing generative features along the concept activation vector. The difference maps with respect to the unperturbed reconstruction are… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Concept prediction performance across different methods. We report the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Concept grounding visualizations produced by different CBMs. On ISIC, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Concept prediction performance of GenCBM under different representa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) offer interpretable alternatives to black-box predictors by introducing human-relatable concepts before the final output. However, existing CBMs struggle to verify whether predicted concepts correspond to the correct visual evidence, limiting their reliability. We propose a fine-grained CBM framework that grounds each concept in localized visual evidence, enabling direct inspection of where and how concepts are encoded. This design allows users to interpret predictions and verify that the model learns intended concepts rather than spurious correlations. Experiments on medical imaging benchmarks show that our learned concept space is information-complete and achieves predictive performance comparable to standard CBMs, while substantially improving transparency. Unlike post-hoc attribution methods, our framework validates both the presence and correctness of concept representations, bridging interpretability with verifiability. Our approach enhances the trustworthiness of CBMs and establishes a principled mechanism for human-model interaction at the concept level, paving the way toward more reliable and clinically actionable concept-based learning systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This adds localization to CBMs for verifiability in medical imaging but does not appear to enforce that predictions actually depend on the localized regions.

read the letter

The main point is that the paper grounds each concept in a specific visual region so users can inspect whether the model is using the intended evidence rather than spurious cues. This is a direct extension of standard concept bottleneck models and moves past post-hoc attribution methods by building the check into the architecture itself. The medical imaging experiments claim comparable accuracy to regular CBMs plus better transparency, which is the practical payoff they are after. That direction is worth attention because verifiable concepts matter in clinical settings. The soft spot is enforcement. The abstract and stress-test description give no sign of an explicit loss term that penalizes concept activations outside the localized mask or that forces the downstream predictor to ignore everything else. Without that, a model could still lean on global image statistics while the localization head produces plausible maps as a side effect. Human inspection then risks becoming circular. The claim that the concept space is information-complete also lacks any reported details on the metric, baselines, or error bars, so it is difficult to judge how solid the results are. This work is for people already working on concept-based interpretability in medical AI. A reader who cares about moving from post-hoc explanations to built-in checks will find the framework idea useful even if the current evidence is preliminary. It deserves peer review because the problem is real and the proposed fix is concrete; referees can check whether the full methods close the enforcement gap.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a fine-grained Concept Bottleneck Model (CBM) framework that grounds each concept in localized visual evidence regions. This design is intended to enable direct human inspection of concept encodings, verify correctness rather than spurious correlations, and improve transparency over standard CBMs and post-hoc attribution methods. Experiments on medical imaging benchmarks are claimed to show that the learned concept space is information-complete, achieves predictive performance comparable to standard CBMs, and substantially improves transparency.

Significance. If the localization mechanism and experimental claims hold, the work would strengthen the verifiability of CBMs in high-stakes domains such as medical imaging by providing a direct way to inspect and validate concept representations, thereby increasing trustworthiness and supporting human-model interaction at the concept level.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that experiments demonstrate an 'information-complete' concept space with comparable predictive performance rests on unspecified methods, baselines, error bars, and quantification of information-completeness; these details are load-bearing for the central claim of improved verifiability and must be supplied with concrete metrics and controls.
[Proposed framework] Proposed framework: no explicit regularization term, loss component, or architectural constraint is described that penalizes concept activations outside the localized visual evidence mask or forces the downstream predictor to ignore non-localized features. Without such a mechanism, localization maps can be produced as a side effect while the model still relies on global image statistics, undermining the guarantee that localization prevents spurious correlations.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'validates both the presence and correctness of concept representations' is used without a precise operational definition or reference to the validation procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that experiments demonstrate an 'information-complete' concept space with comparable predictive performance rests on unspecified methods, baselines, error bars, and quantification of information-completeness; these details are load-bearing for the central claim of improved verifiability and must be supplied with concrete metrics and controls.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should provide more concrete details to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will expand the abstract to specify the metrics used to quantify information-completeness (concept prediction accuracy on held-out patches together with downstream task performance retention), the baselines employed (standard CBMs and end-to-end black-box models), and the use of error bars obtained from multiple random seeds. These elements are already reported in Section 4; the revision will simply make them explicit in the abstract. revision: yes
Referee: [Proposed framework] Proposed framework: no explicit regularization term, loss component, or architectural constraint is described that penalizes concept activations outside the localized visual evidence mask or forces the downstream predictor to ignore non-localized features. Without such a mechanism, localization maps can be produced as a side effect while the model still relies on global image statistics, undermining the guarantee that localization prevents spurious correlations.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. While the framework supplies localized patches as the sole input for each concept predictor, the original submission did not include an explicit penalty that strictly discourages activations outside those patches. To close this gap we will introduce a regularization term in the loss that penalizes concept activations outside the provided localization masks. This addition will enforce that the learned concept representations are grounded exclusively in the designated visual evidence and will be described in the revised Section 3. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; localization framework adds independent verification mechanism

full rationale

The paper proposes a fine-grained CBM with explicit localization of concepts to visual regions, enabling human inspection for presence and correctness. No equations or training objectives are shown to reduce by construction to fitted parameters or prior self-citations; the claim of information-completeness and comparable performance rests on experimental benchmarks rather than tautological re-derivation. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the core transparency argument, which introduces a new grounding step not equivalent to standard CBM inputs. This yields a minor score reflecting normal academic self-reference without forcing the central result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the framework appears to build on existing CBM concepts without introducing new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1026 out tokens · 33762 ms · 2026-05-15T02:11:05.265582+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Nature Machine Intelligence3(12), 1061–1070 (2021)

Barnett, A.J., Schwartz, F.R., Tao, C., Chen, C., Ren, Y., Lo, J.Y., Rudin, C.: A case-based interpretable deep learning model for classification of mass lesions in digital mammography. Nature Machine Intelligence3(12), 1061–1070 (2021)

work page 2021
[2]

Nature Communications15(1), 524 (2024)

Chanda, T., Hauser, K., Hobelsberger, S., Bucher, T.C., Garcia, C.N., Wies, C., Kittler, H., Tschandl, P., Navarrete-Dechent, C., Podlipnik, S., et al.: Dermatologist-like explainable ai enhances trust and confidence in diagnosing melanoma. Nature Communications15(1), 524 (2024)

work page 2024
[3]

In: 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV)

Chattopadhay, A., Sarkar, A., Howlader, P., Balasubramanian, V.N.: Grad- cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. In: 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV). pp. 839–847. IEEE (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)

Codella, N., Rotemberg, V., Tschandl, P., Celebi, M.E., Dusza, S., Gutman, D., Helba,B.,Kalloo,A.,Liopyris,K.,Marchetti,M.,etal.:Skinlesionanalysistoward melanoma detection 2018: A challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (isic). arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03368 (2019)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[5]

Advances in neural information processing systems35, 21400–21413 (2022)

Espinosa Zarlenga, M., Barbiero, P., Ciravegna, G., Marra, G., Giannini, F., Dili- genti, M., Shams, Z., Precioso, F., Melacci, S., Weller, A., et al.: Concept em- bedding models: Beyond the accuracy-explainability trade-off. Advances in neural information processing systems35, 21400–21413 (2022)

work page 2022
[6]

In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

Gao, Y., Gu, D., Zhou, M., Metaxas, D.: Aligning human knowledge with visual concepts towards explainable medical image classification. In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 46–56. Springer (2024)

work page 2024
[7]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 23386–23397 (2022)

Havasi, M., Parbhoo, S., Doshi-Velez, F.: Addressing leakage in concept bottle- neck models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 23386–23397 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

He,K.,Zhang,X.,Ren,S.,Sun,J.:Deepresiduallearningforimagerecognition.In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 770–778 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Huang, Q., Song, J., Hu, J., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Song, M.: On the concept trust- worthiness in concept bottleneck models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38, pp. 21161–21168 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

Huy, T.D., Tran, S.K., Nguyen, P., Tran, N.H., Sam, T.B., van den Hengel, A., Liao, Z., Verjans, J.W., To, M.S., Phan, V.M.H.: Interactive medical image analysis with concept-based similarity reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 30797–30806 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

Irvin, J., Rajpurkar, P., Ko, M., Yu, Y., Ciurea-Ilcus, S., Chute, C., Marklund, H., Haghgoo, B., Ball, R., Shpanskaya, K., et al.: Chexpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 33, pp. 590–597 (2019)

work page 2019
[12]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., Aila, T.: Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 8110–8119 (2020)

work page 2020
[13]

In: International conference on machine learning

Kim, B., Wattenberg, M., Gilmer, J., Cai, C., Wexler, J., Viegas, F., et al.: Inter- pretabilitybeyondfeatureattribution:Quantitativetestingwithconceptactivation vectors (tcav). In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 2668–2677. PMLR (2018) 10 Y. Fang, H. Xu et al

work page 2018
[14]

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[15]

In: International conference on machine learning

Koh, P.W., Nguyen, T., Tang, Y.S., Mussmann, S., Pierson, E., Kim, B., Liang, P.: Concept bottleneck models. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 5338–5348. PMLR (2020)

work page 2020
[16]

In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

Oikarinen, T., Das, S., Nguyen, L.M., Weng, T.W.: Label-free concept bottleneck models. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

work page 2023
[17]

In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

Oikarinen, T., Weng, T.W.: Clip-dissect: Automatic description of neuron rep- resentations in deep vision networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

work page 2023
[18]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

Preechakul, K., Chatthee, N., Wizadwongsa, S., Suwajanakorn, S.: Diffusion au- toencoders: Toward a meaningful and decodable representation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10619– 10629 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recog- nition

Richardson, E., Alaluf, Y., Patashnik, O., Nitzan, Y., Azar, Y., Shapiro, S., Cohen- Or, D.: Encoding in style: a stylegan encoder for image-to-image translation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recog- nition. pp. 2287–2296 (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision

Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad- cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. pp. 618–626 (2017)

work page 2017
[21]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 26966– 26990 (2023)

Sheth, I., Ebrahimi Kahou, S.: Auxiliary losses for learning generalizable concept- based models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 26966– 26990 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

arXiv e-prints pp

Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv e-prints pp. arXiv–1409 (2014)

work page 2014
[23]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision

Tan, A., Zhou, F., Chen, H.: Explain via any concept: Concept bottleneck model with open vocabulary concepts. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 123–138. Springer (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Scientific data5(1), 180161 (2018)

Tschandl, P., Rosendahl, C., Kittler, H.: The ham10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions. Scientific data5(1), 180161 (2018)

work page 2018
[25]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12568 (2025)

Wang, C., Zhang, K., Liu, Y., He, Z., Tao, X., Zhou, S.K.: Mvp-cbm: Multi-layer visualpreference-enhancedconceptbottleneckmodelforexplainablemedicalimage classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12568 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Xie, Y., Zeng, Z., Zhang, H., Ding, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, B., Liu, H.: Discovering fine-grained visual-concept relations by disentangled optimal trans- port concept bottleneck models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 30199–30209 (2025)

work page 2025
[27]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

Xu, Y., Shen, Y., Zhu, J., Yang, C., Zhou, B.: Generative hierarchical features from synthesizing images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 4432–4442 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

Zhang, R., Du, X., Yan, J., Zhang, S.: The decoupling concept bottleneck model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

work page 2024