arxiv: 2605.14233 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A new sample of Little Red Dots at z<0.45 in DESI DR1: Broad Balmer lines, low ionization spectrum and no variability

Kevin Park , Alberto Torralba , Jorryt Matthee , Sara Mascia , Zolt\'an Haiman , Rohan P. Naidu , Anna de Graaff

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords Little Red Dotslow redshiftDESI surveybroad Balmer lineslow ionizationsupermassive black holesnumber densityhigh redshift evolution

0 comments

The pith

Eight Little Red Dots at z=0.2-0.45 show broad Balmer lines and low-ionization spectra but at a number density 10,000 times lower than at high redshift.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies eight sources at moderate redshifts that match the spectral traits of the Little Red Dots discovered by JWST at z greater than 4. Selection relies on emission-line signatures such as broad Balmer lines with steep decrements, Balmer absorption, strong He I, and the absence of high-excitation lines rather than photometry alone. These objects exhibit little to no variability over years of monitoring. Their derived space density is far smaller than the high-redshift population, which the authors link to reduced gas accretion or higher metallicities at later cosmic times. The result opens the possibility of detailed ground-based study of this black-hole growth channel outside the first billion years.

Core claim

We report the discovery of eight LRDs at z=0.2-0.45 in DESI DR1. The sources display broad Balmer lines, steep Balmer decrements, compact morphologies, Balmer absorption features and/or strong He I emission, yet weak or absent He II, [Ne V] and other high-excitation lines. For most objects, multi-year light curves show weak or no intrinsic variability. Within the 4.9 Gpc^3 effective volume at z<0.45, the sample implies a number density of 1.6 times 10 to the minus 9 per cubic megaparsec, roughly 10,000 times lower than at z greater than 4, consistent with a decline in LRD activity driven by higher metallicities and lower gas feeding rates at later epochs.

What carries the argument

Emission-line selection criteria that isolate broad Balmer lines combined with steep decrements, Balmer absorption or strong He I, and the absence of high-ionization lines such as He II and [Ne V].

If this is right

LRD activity appears strongly suppressed at z less than 1 compared with the first billion years.
The lack of variability and high-ionization lines favors a non-standard accretion mode over typical Type I AGN.
Higher metallicities at lower redshift may reduce the gas supply needed to sustain LRD-like emission.
Ground-based facilities can now obtain detailed follow-up spectra and imaging of LRD analogs that were previously accessible only at high redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The sharp drop in density suggests LRDs trace a transient early-universe phase that largely ends once metallicities rise.
Mapping the redshift evolution between z=0.45 and z=2 with similar line-based searches could pinpoint when the population declines.
If the selection remains clean at intermediate redshifts, LRDs may represent a distinct supermassive-black-hole growth channel rather than a short-lived subset of ordinary quasars.

Load-bearing premise

The emission-line criteria cleanly select true LRD analogs without significant contamination from other AGN or star-forming galaxies at these redshifts.

What would settle it

An independent search using photometric compactness plus spectroscopy in the same DESI volume that recovers a number density closer to the high-redshift value would falsify the reported scarcity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14233 by Alberto Torralba, Anna de Graaff, Jorryt Matthee, Kevin Park, Rohan P. Naidu, Sara Mascia, Zolt\'an Haiman.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The DESI rest-frame spectrum of J1717+3807 (black), showing the rest-frame wavelength ranges 3500–5400 Å (top) and 5800–7200 Å (bottom). We mark the wavelengths of relevant spectral lines with blue dashed lines. As required by our search, the source shows weak [S ii] and [N ii], weak [Ne v], strong He i 5876, 7067, and a sharp absorption feature in the Hα line. Intruigingly, we identify a Balmer jump (see … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The reduced chi-squared distribution (minimum value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Hα profiles of all local LRDs identified in this work, along with the best-fit model in green, the exponential component of the model in dashed-blue, and the narrow Gaussian component in dashed-red. The residuals in the insets show (data − model)/error. Article number, page 6 of 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Scatter plot of He i λ5876 EW vs Hα/Hβ ratios for our parent sample in DESI (blue contours) compared to high redshift LRDs of Matthee et al. (2026) (red points) and the local LRDs of this work (black points). DESI contours show a Gaussian KDE, with contour levels corresponding to e −1 , e −2 , e −3 , and e −4 times the peak density. We mark the theoretical Case B recombination value of 3.1 with a horizont… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Spectral energy distributions of our sample. We show the DESI spectrum with a black line, resampled to a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Stack of our 8 selected LRDs (black) compared to the JWST/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Measured Damped Random Walk (DRW) parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The Balmer lines (Hα–Hϵ) of the LRD-contaminant BAQ1 that shows strong blueshifted absorption features at ∼ 350 km s−1 . We overlay the spectra with our best-fit model (see model details in Section 3) using dashed gray curves. In the case of Hγ we simultaneously fit the [O iii]λ4363 line. Spectra are offset vertically for clarity. curve, we find σint = 0.047+0.022 −0.047 mag, indicating weak variability … view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: ZTF r-band rest-frame light curves of J1717 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Number density estimate of DESI LRDs compared to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Left panel: Distribution of Hα luminosity as a function of redshift for DESI local LRDs (this work), and other known LRDs Lin et al. (2026); Matthee et al. (2026); de Graaff et al. (2025b); Torralba et al. (2026b). Right panel: Balmer break strength vs Hα luminosity for the de Graaff et al. (2025b) sample compared to DESI local LRDs. 6. Summary Samples of Little Red Dots at low redshift offer valuable in… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

JWST has unveiled an abundant population of compact broad-line emitters largely at $z\gtrsim4$, the Little Red Dots (LRDs), which might represent a previously unprobed supermassive black hole evolution channel predominant at high redshift. However, the LRDs have remained mostly elusive at lower redshift ($z\lesssim2$) where detailed studies are possible from ground-based observatories. We searched for low-redshift LRDs in the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. Our search is primarily based on emission line properties, as opposed to earlier approaches that searched for compact sources with specific photometric spectral energy distributions. We report the discovery of eight LRDs at $z=0.2-0.45$, which show spectral features akin to the high-redshift LRDs in the rest-frame optical. The sources are characterized by broad Balmer lines, steep Balmer decrements, compact morphologies, Balmer absorption features and/or strong He I emission, but weak or absent He II, [Ne V] or other high excitation lines typical of Type I AGN. For 7 out of 8 sources, we retrieve dense-cadence light curves from time-domain surveys and for most sources we find weak to no intrinsic variability ($0.0-0.1$ mag) over $4-17$ years in the rest-frame. We also highlight the identification of a quasar with similar Balmer line profiles as LRDs, but shows differences in Balmer decrement, significant variability, and high-ionisation lines. Given the effective volume $4.9{\rm Gpc^3}$ covered by DESI DR1 at $z<0.45$, our sample corresponds to a number density of $1.6\times10^{-9}$Mpc$^{-3}$, indicating a number density $\sim$10,000 times lower than in the first billion years of cosmic time. We find a dearth of luminous and red LRDs at $z<1$ compared to higher-redshift, which could suggest lower gas feeding rates of LRD activity due to higher metallicities at later cosmic epochs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper finds eight low-z LRD analogs in DESI via emission-line selection and reports a ~10,000x density drop, but selection purity is the open question.

read the letter

The key point is that this work has turned up eight objects at z=0.2-0.45 whose spectra match the broad Balmer lines, steep decrements, and low-ionization features of the high-redshift Little Red Dots. They switched to an emission-line search in DESI DR1 instead of the usual photometric color cuts, pulled light curves showing little to no variability for most, and calculated a number density of 1.6e-9 Mpc^{-3} that is four orders of magnitude below the z>4 population. They also flag one quasar with similar lines that does vary and shows high-ionization features, which shows they are trying to draw a distinction. That low-redshift sample is the actual advance: it opens ground-based monitoring and multi-wavelength work that is impossible at high z. The concrete numbers on variability amplitudes and the volume estimate from the public survey are straightforward to check. The main soft spot is selection purity. Broad Balmer lines plus weak high-excitation lines overlap with reddened Type-1 AGN and some composites at these redshifts, and the paper does not report a false-positive rate or the exact S/N and ratio cuts applied to the full parent catalog. Without those, the claimed density contrast rests on an assumption that needs tighter validation. The methods appear reproducible from public data, but the current write-up leaves that gap. This is for researchers tracking black-hole growth channels and testing whether LRDs are a high-z-only phase. A reader who wants a concrete low-z sample to follow up will get something useful even if the numbers need refinement. It deserves peer review because the observational claim is specific and the low-z window is new; referees can tighten the selection details without starting from scratch.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of eight Little Red Dot (LRD) analogs at z=0.2-0.45 in DESI DR1, selected primarily via emission-line properties (broad Balmer lines, steep decrements, absent high-ionization lines such as He II and [Ne V], plus compact morphologies and low variability). The sample yields a number density of 1.6×10^{-9} Mpc^{-3} over an effective volume of 4.9 Gpc^3, implying a ~10,000-fold drop relative to z>4 LRDs, which the authors attribute to reduced gas feeding rates at later epochs due to higher metallicities.

Significance. If the sample purity holds, the work supplies the first sizable low-redshift LRD analog set accessible to ground-based follow-up, enabling detailed studies of Balmer absorption, He I emission, and host properties that are difficult at high z. The reported density contrast provides a quantitative benchmark for evolutionary models of compact broad-line emitters and suggests a strong redshift dependence in the prevalence of this AGN phase.

major comments (1)

[Source selection] In the section describing the emission-line selection (criteria for broad Balmer lines, steep decrements, and absent high-ionization lines), the manuscript excludes one quasar on variability and line-strength grounds but does not apply the full set of thresholds to a control sample drawn from the DESI DR1 parent catalog or report a false-positive rate. This omission directly affects the claimed purity of the eight sources and therefore the reliability of the number density 1.6×10^{-9} Mpc^{-3} and the 10,000× contrast with high-z LRDs.

minor comments (2)

[Variability analysis] The variability amplitudes (0.0-0.1 mag) are stated for 7/8 sources over 4-17 years rest-frame, but the precise time baselines, photometric bands, and error floors for each object are not tabulated, making it difficult to assess consistency with the 'weak to no intrinsic variability' claim.
[Results] Figure captions and text refer to 'dense-cadence light curves' without specifying the surveys (e.g., ZTF, CRTS) or the exact cadence and depth used for each source.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: In the section describing the emission-line selection (criteria for broad Balmer lines, steep decrements, and absent high-ionization lines), the manuscript excludes one quasar on variability and line-strength grounds but does not apply the full set of thresholds to a control sample drawn from the DESI DR1 parent catalog or report a false-positive rate. This omission directly affects the claimed purity of the eight sources and therefore the reliability of the number density 1.6×10^{-9} Mpc^{-3} and the 10,000× contrast with high-z LRDs.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern regarding the purity of our selected sample. Our selection criteria were applied to identify sources with specific emission-line properties characteristic of LRDs, and we manually inspected the spectra of candidates to ensure they match the described features. The exclusion of the one quasar was based on its deviation from the criteria in terms of variability and presence of high-ionization lines. We acknowledge that a quantitative assessment of the false-positive rate by applying the full selection to a control sample from the parent catalog would provide additional confidence in the sample purity. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will add a discussion or appendix estimating the false-positive rate, for example by applying the criteria to a large random subset of DESI spectra at similar redshifts and reporting the number of contaminants. This will help substantiate the reliability of the reported number density and the contrast with high-redshift LRDs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational count of low-z LRD candidates shows no circularity

full rationale

The central result is a direct count of eight sources identified via explicit emission-line criteria in the external DESI DR1 catalog, divided by the stated survey volume of 4.9 Gpc³ to yield the number density 1.6×10^{-9} Mpc^{-3}. This calculation uses no fitted parameters, no self-referential definitions, and no predictions that reduce to the inputs by construction. The comparison to high-z densities draws on independent literature values that are externally falsifiable. Selection criteria are stated explicitly but function as an assumption about sample purity rather than a derivation that loops back on itself. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is load-bearing for the reported density or its redshift evolution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The discovery rests on standard spectroscopic classification assumptions and the completeness of DESI DR1 at z<0.45. No new physical entities or free parameters are introduced; the number density is a direct count divided by the stated survey volume.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Broad Balmer lines with steep decrements and absent high-ionization lines reliably flag LRD analogs at low redshift
Invoked in the selection criteria described in the abstract.
standard math DESI DR1 provides a well-characterized volume of 4.9 Gpc^3 at z<0.45
Used to convert the eight detections into a number density.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5745 in / 1607 out tokens · 20945 ms · 2026-05-15T02:43:51.400258+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Our search is primarily based on emission line properties... broad Balmer lines, steep Balmer decrements, compact morphologies, Balmer absorption features and/or strong He I emission, but weak or absent He II, [Ne V]
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Given the effective volume 4.9 Gpc^3... number density of 1.6×10^{-9} Mpc^{-3}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

2022, ApJS, 259, 35

Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35

work page 2022
[2]

T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O

Ananna, T. T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJ, 969, L18 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33 Bär, R. E...

work page 2024
[3]

G., Kocevski, D., et al

Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.15853

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

G., Kocevski, D

Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.01887

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

A., Skillman, E

Benjamin, R. A., Skillman, E. D., & Smits, D. P. 2002, ApJ, 569, 288

work page 2002
[6]

A Fleeting GLIMPSE of N/O Enrichment at Cosmic Dawn: Evidence for Wolf Rayet N Stars in a z = 6.1 Galaxy

Berg, D. A., Naidu, R. P., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.13591

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

A., Sanders, R

Berg, D. A., Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.17057

work page arXiv
[8]

2017, ApJS, 230, 24

Bianchi, L., Shiao, B., & Thilker, D. 2017, ApJS, 230, 24

work page 2017
[9]

2025, MNRAS, 544, L167

Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L167

work page 2025
[10]

C., Trump, J

Brooks, M., Simons, R. C., Trump, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 177

work page 2025
[11]

J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y ., & Jiang, Y .-F

Burke, C. J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y ., & Jiang, Y .-F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16082

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

A., Clayton, G

Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

work page 1989
[13]

M., Akins, H

Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, L61

work page 2025
[14]

2025, MN- RAS[arXiv:2508.08768]

Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2025, MN- RAS[arXiv:2508.08768]

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15935 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, A&A, 701, A168

work page arXiv 2026
[16]

2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 704, A313, aDS Bibcode: 2025A&A...704A.313D DESI Collaboration, Abdul Karim, M., Adame, A

Delvecchio, I., Daddi, E., Magnelli, B., et al. 2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 704, A313, aDS Bibcode: 2025A&A...704A.313D DESI Collaboration, Abdul Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 285 D’Eugenio, F., Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., et al. 2025a, MNRAS[arXiv:2506.14870] D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Perna, M., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2...

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

Discovery of low-redshift analogues to "Little Red Dots" in DESI: A later evolutionary stage of compact LRDs?

Ding, W., Kong, X., Guo, W.-J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.14551

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[18]

J., Djorgovski, S

Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870

work page 2009
[19]

2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12325

Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., Brammer, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12325

work page arXiv 2026
[20]

J., Olsen, K., Economou, F., et al

Fitzpatrick, M. J., Olsen, K., Economou, F., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 9149, Ob- servatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems V , ed. A. B. Peck, C. R. Benn, & R. L. Seaman, 91491T

work page 2014
[21]

2017, ArXiv

Foreman-Mackey, D., Agol, E., Angus, R., & Ambikasaran, S. 2017, ArXiv

work page 2017
[22]

B., Watson, D., et al

Fujimoto, S., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2022, Nature, 604, 261

work page 2022
[23]

E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

work page 2024
[24]

Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

work page 2007
[25]

E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57

work page 2025
[26]

2025, ApJ, 988, L22

Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJ, 988, L22

work page 2025
[27]

Inayoshi, K. & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

& Maiolino, R

Inayoshi, K. & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJ, 980, L27 Ivezi´c, Ž., Connolly, A., Vanderplas, J., & Gray, A. 2014, Statistics, Data Mining and Machine Learning in Astronomy (Princeton University Press)

work page 2025
[29]

Izotov, Y . I. & Thuan, T. X. 2008, ApJ, 687, 133

work page 2008
[30]

I., Thuan, T

Izotov, Y . I., Thuan, T. X., & Guseva, N. G. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1297

work page 2007
[31]

2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.23774

Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodžbalis, I., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.23774

work page arXiv
[32]

2021, Computing in Science and Engineering, 23, 15 Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al

Juneau, S., Olsen, K., Nikutta, R., Jacques, A., & Bailey, S. 2021, Computing in Science and Engineering, 23, 15 Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853

work page 2021
[33]

Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407

work page 2025
[34]

2024, A&A, 691, A52

Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52

work page 2024
[35]

D., Finkelstein, S

Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126

work page 2025
[36]

D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, L4

work page 2023
[37]

I., Greene, J

Kokorev, V ., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38

work page 2024
[38]

P., et al

Kokorev, V ., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07515

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

& Harikane, Y

Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y . 2025, ApJ, 995, 24

work page 2025
[40]

& Svoboda, J

Kouroumpatzakis, K. & Svoboda, J. 2025, A&A, 696, A133

work page 2025
[41]

E., Bezanson, R., et al

Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92

work page 2025
[42]

A., Aftab, A., Whalen, D

Latif, M. A., Aftab, A., Whalen, D. J., & Mezcua, M. 2025, A&A, 694, L14 Article number, page 15 of 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no. main 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 100 101 fλ [10□17 erg s □1 cm□2 ˚A□1] [O II] λ3727 H11 λ3770 H10 λ3798 H9 λ3835 [Ne III] λ3869 Hζ λ 3889 Hϵ λ 3970 Hδ λ 4102 Hγ λ 4341 [O III] λ4363 [Fe II] λ4417 He I λ4471 He II λ46...

work page 2025
[43]

Leung, G. C. K., Finkelstein, S. L., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 26

work page 2025
[44]

2026, ApJ, 997, 364

Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 364

work page 2026
[45]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10659

Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10659

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317

Liu, H., Jiang, Y .-F., Quataert, E., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317

work page arXiv
[47]

How I Wonder What You Are -- JWST's Little Red Dots do not TWINKLE

Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[48]

2025, A&A, 703, A36

Loiacono, F., Gilli, R., Mignoli, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A36

work page 2025
[49]

Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447

work page 1976
[50]

E., Setton, D

Ma, Y ., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08032

work page arXiv
[51]

E., V olonteri, M., et al

Ma, Y ., Greene, J. E., V olonteri, M., et al. 2025c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.02662 Article number, page 16 of 21 Kevin Park et al.: DESI LRDs 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 10□1 100 101 fλ [10□17 erg s □1 cm□2 ˚A□1] [O II] λ3727 H11 λ3770 H10 λ3798 H9 λ3835 [Ne III] λ3869 Hζ λ 3889 Hϵ λ 3970 Hδ λ 4102 Hγ λ 4341 [O III] λ4363 [Fe II] λ4417 He ...

work page arXiv
[52]

L., Ivezi´c, Ž., Kochanek, C

MacLeod, C. L., Ivezi´c, Ž., Kochanek, C. S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1014

work page 2010
[53]

L., Ivezi´c, Ž., Sesar, B., et al

MacLeod, C. L., Ivezi´c, Ž., Sesar, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 106

work page 2012
[54]

& Maiolino, R

Madau, P. & Maiolino, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.22386

work page arXiv 2026
[55]

G., & Thompson, D

Mahabal, A., Stern, D., Bogosavljevi ´c, M., Djorgovski, S. G., & Thompson, D. 2005, ApJ, 634, L9

work page 2005
[56]

2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921

Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921

work page 2025
[57]

2024, A&A, 691, A145

Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145

work page 2024
[58]

J., Laher, R

Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 018003

work page 2018
[59]

Mathis, J. S. 1957, ApJ, 125, 318

work page 1957
[60]

P., Brammer, G., et al

Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129 Article number, page 17 of 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no. main 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 10□1 100 101 102 fλ [10□17 erg s □1 cm□2 ˚A□1] [O II] λ3727 H11 λ3770 H10 λ3798 H9 λ3835 [Ne III] λ3869 Hζ λ 3889 Hϵ λ 3970 Hδ λ 4102 Hγ λ 4341 [O III] λ4363 [Fe II] λ4417 He I λ4471 He II ...

work page 2024
[61]

2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667

Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667

work page arXiv 2026
[62]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04224

Mazzolari, G., Gilli, R., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04224

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

Millman, K. J. & Aivazis, M. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 9

work page 2011
[64]

D., Moustakas, J., Bailey, S., et al

Myers, A. D., Moustakas, J., Bailey, S., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 50

work page 2023
[65]

P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

& Loeb, A

Nandal, D. & Loeb, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.12618

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

B., & Ingargiola, A

Newville, M., Stensitzki, T., Allen, D. B., & Ingargiola, A. 2014, LMFIT: Non- Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python

work page 2014
[68]

P., Watson, D., Sneppen, A., et al

Nikopoulos, G. P., Watson, D., Sneppen, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.06362 Article number, page 18 of 21 Kevin Park et al.: DESI LRDs 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 10□1 100 101 fλ [10□17 erg s □1 cm□2 ˚A□1] [O II] λ3727 H11 λ3770 H10 λ3798 H9 λ3835 [Ne III] λ3869 Hζ λ 3889 Hϵ λ 3970 Hδ λ 4102 Hγ λ 4341 [O III] λ4363 [Fe II] λ4417 ...

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

Nikutta, R., Fitzpatrick, M., Scott, A., & Weaver, B. A. 2020, Astronomy and Computing, 33, 100411

work page 2020
[70]

Oke, J. B. & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713

work page 1983
[71]

Oliphant, T. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 10 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.20247

work page arXiv 2007
[72]

Perger, K., Fogasy, J., Frey, S., & Gabányi, K. É. 2025, A&A, 693, L2

work page 2025
[73]

2024, A&A, 685, A97

Pouliasis, E., Ruiz, A., Georgantopoulos, I., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A97

work page 2024
[74]

C., Castellanos-Ramírez, A., Esquivel, A., Rodríguez-González, A., & Velázquez, P

Raga, A. C., Castellanos-Ramírez, A., Esquivel, A., Rodríguez-González, A., & Velázquez, P. F. 2015, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 51, 231

work page 2015
[75]

2025, ApJ, 989, 88

Reiss, T., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 88

work page 2025
[76]

P., et al

Rusakov, V ., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16595

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835

work page 1982
[78]

2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277

Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277

work page arXiv 2026
[79]

S., Jiang, Y .-F., et al

Secunda, A., Somerville, R. S., Jiang, Y .-F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.03571

work page arXiv 2025
[80]

E., Thuan, T

Simmonds, C., Bauer, F. E., Thuan, T. X., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A64

work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.