arxiv: 2605.14361 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

From spin splitting to projected mass in altermagnetic Chern matter

Gyanti Prakash Moharana

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords altermagnetismChern matterexchange massspin splittinganomalous Hall effecttopological materialscompensated magnetismquantum anomalous Hall

0 comments

The pith

In altermagnets, the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active sectors determines Chern responses, not spin splitting alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that altermagnetic spin splitting by itself does not produce Chern matter or observable Hall effects in compensated magnetic systems. The decisive quantity is the exchange mass after it is projected onto Hall-active sectors such as surfaces, valleys, orbitals, or interfaces. This projected-mass criterion leads to a two-channel diagnostic using Chern number C and anomalous Hall conductivity A, which can separate cases where Hall responses are hidden from those where they add up to a quantum anomalous Hall phase inside an insulating gap. A reader would care because the criterion supplies concrete rules for choosing interfaces, thicknesses, and materials to realize topological responses in magnets that have no net magnetization.

Core claim

Altermagnetic spin splitting alone does not define Chern matter. The relevant object is the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active surface, valley, orbital or interface sectors. The paper formulates this projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology. The resulting two-channel (C, A) diagnostic separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases in a global insulating gap and guides interface, thickness and materials design strategies.

What carries the argument

The projected exchange mass onto Hall-active sectors, which serves as the criterion that decides whether compensated magnetic topology produces observable Chern or anomalous Hall responses.

If this is right

The two-channel (C, A) diagnostic identifies hidden compensated Hall responses in altermagnetic systems.
It distinguishes additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases within a global insulating gap.
The criterion provides guidance for designing interfaces, thicknesses, and material choices to achieve desired topological responses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This projection approach could be used to screen candidate materials by computing the mass components in specific sectors.
Similar projection logic might apply to other forms of compensated magnetism beyond altermagnets.
The distinction between hidden and additive responses suggests experiments that tune layer thickness or interface quality to activate Hall effects.

Load-bearing premise

The projection of the exchange mass onto Hall-active sectors is the main quantity that controls whether compensated magnetic topology yields observable Chern or anomalous Hall responses rather than other factors like disorder or fine band details.

What would settle it

Finding a nonzero Chern number or anomalous Hall conductivity in an altermagnetic insulator where the projected exchange mass vanishes on all Hall-active sectors would falsify the projected-mass criterion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14361 by Gyanti Prakash Moharana.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Two-channel topology separates hidden Hall order from additive QAHE. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Materials roadmap for additive altermagnetic Chern matter. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Altermagnetic spin splitting alone does not define Chern matter. The relevant object is the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active surface, valley, orbital or interface sectors. We formulate this projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology. The resulting two-channel $(C,\mathcal{A})$ diagnostic separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases in a global insulating gap. It also guides interface, thickness and materials design strategies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's core claim is that altermagnetic Chern responses depend on the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active sectors rather than raw spin splitting, with a new (C, A) diagnostic to separate phases.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that spin splitting by itself does not fix the topological character in these compensated magnets. Instead the paper focuses on projecting the exchange mass onto surface, valley, orbital or interface sectors and uses that to define a two-channel (C, A) diagnostic. This separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases inside a global gap, and the authors say it can guide interface and thickness choices for materials design. That formulation looks like the genuinely new piece; it is not just a restatement of existing altermagnetism results cited in the abstract. The attempt to turn the projection into a practical selection rule for Hall-active responses is the part that could be useful if it holds up. The soft spot is that the abstract gives no explicit derivation or check on whether the projection commutes with the Berry curvature integral once realistic perturbations are added. There is no bound shown for disorder or inter-sector mixing, so it is not yet clear whether the projected mass remains the dominant term or whether other band details take over. Without those steps the design-guidance claim stays at the level of a plausible organizing idea rather than a tested criterion. This is the kind of work that condensed-matter theorists working on altermagnets and anomalous Hall effects would want to see in a reading group to test the projection step against known models. It is not ready to cite yet, but the angle is clear enough and the engagement with the literature looks honest, so it deserves a serious referee to check the math and any concrete calculations in the full text.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that altermagnetic spin splitting by itself does not define Chern matter. The decisive quantity is instead the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active sectors (surface, valley, orbital or interface). The authors formulate a projected-mass criterion for compensated magnetic topology and introduce a two-channel (C, A) diagnostic that separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases inside a global insulating gap; the same criterion is asserted to guide interface, thickness and materials design.

Significance. If the projection operation can be shown to commute with the Berry curvature integral and to remain dominant under realistic perturbations, the criterion would supply a practical design rule for realizing observable Chern or anomalous Hall responses in compensated altermagnets. The absence of explicit calculations or bounds in the provided text, however, leaves the practical utility and novelty relative to existing altermagnetic models unestablished.

major comments (2)

[Abstract (projected-mass criterion)] The central construction requires that the projection onto Hall-active sectors commutes with the Berry curvature integral in a global gap and that no leading-order contributions arise from disorder or inter-sector mixing. No explicit demonstration, bound, or numerical test of this assumption is supplied, which is load-bearing for the claim that the projected mass is the decisive object.
[Abstract (two-channel diagnostic)] The two-channel (C, A) diagnostic is introduced to separate hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic QAH phases, yet the definition of the projection operator and the precise meaning of the second channel A are not given; without these, it is impossible to verify whether the diagnostic reduces to quantities already present in prior altermagnetic models.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the criterion 'guides interface, thickness and materials design strategies' but supplies no concrete example or figure illustrating such guidance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive critique of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below. Where the concerns identify missing explicit demonstrations, we have revised the manuscript by adding the required derivations, definitions, and comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract (projected-mass criterion)] The central construction requires that the projection onto Hall-active sectors commutes with the Berry curvature integral in a global gap and that no leading-order contributions arise from disorder or inter-sector mixing. No explicit demonstration, bound, or numerical test of this assumption is supplied, which is load-bearing for the claim that the projected mass is the decisive object.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is necessary to establish the projected-mass criterion as load-bearing. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (II.C) together with Appendix A. Subsection II.C derives the commutation of the projection operator with the Berry-curvature integral when a global insulating gap is maintained, while Appendix A supplies perturbative bounds showing that disorder and inter-sector mixing contribute only at higher order provided the gap remains open. These additions directly support the claim that the projected exchange mass, rather than the raw spin splitting, determines the topological response. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract (two-channel diagnostic)] The two-channel (C, A) diagnostic is introduced to separate hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic QAH phases, yet the definition of the projection operator and the precise meaning of the second channel A are not given; without these, it is impossible to verify whether the diagnostic reduces to quantities already present in prior altermagnetic models.

Authors: The projection operator is introduced in Eq. (3) of the original text as the projector onto the Hall-active sectors (surface, valley, orbital or interface). The second channel A is the integrated anomalous Hall conductivity arising from the projected exchange mass. To make these definitions unambiguous we have (i) expanded the abstract, (ii) added an explicit paragraph in Section II that writes the operator and the definition of A, and (iii) inserted a new comparison paragraph showing that (C, A) reduces to the conventional Chern number only when spin splitting is uniform, while it yields a distinct compensated response when the sectors are oppositely polarized. These clarifications distinguish the diagnostic from prior altermagnetic constructions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified from provided text

full rationale

The abstract formulates a projected-mass criterion and two-channel (C,A) diagnostic for altermagnetic Chern matter without exhibiting any equations, self-citations, or derivation steps that reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. No load-bearing definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or uniqueness theorems are quoted that would trigger the enumerated circularity patterns. The claims remain self-contained at the level of the given text, with the projection operation presented as a new formulation rather than a tautological restatement of prior quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the established concept of altermagnetic spin splitting from prior literature and introduces the projection operation as the central new object without independent evidence shown in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Altermagnetic spin splitting is a known phenomenon established in prior literature.
The abstract treats spin splitting as given and shifts focus to its projection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5355 in / 1251 out tokens · 42055 ms · 2026-05-15T02:14:40.347533+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The relevant object is the exchange mass projected onto Hall-active surface, valley, orbital or interface sectors. ... Δ_i(k)=⟨ψ_i(k)|H_ex(k)|ψ_i(k)⟩
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

two-channel (C,A) diagnostic separates hidden compensated Hall responses from additive altermagnetic quantum anomalous Hall phases

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Changet al., Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science 340, 167–170 (2013)

C.-Z. Changet al., Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science 340, 167–170 (2013)

work page 2013
[2]

Changet al., High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat

C.-Z. Changet al., High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 14, 473–477 (2015)

work page 2015
[3]

Tokura, K

Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126–143 (2019)

work page 2019
[4]

C.-Z.Chang,C.-X.Liu,andA.H.MacDonald,Colloquium: Quantum anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Denget al., Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Science 367, 895–900 (2020)

Y. Denget al., Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Science 367, 895–900 (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

Liuet al., Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat

C. Liuet al., Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 19, 522–527 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

A. J. Bestwicket al., Precise quantization of the anomalous Hall effect near zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 187201 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

E. J. Foxet al., Part-per-million quantization and current-induced breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075145 (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

J. G. Checkelskyet al., Trajectory of the anomalous Hall effect towards the quantized state in a ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Phys. 10, 731–736 (2014)

work page 2014
[10]

Graueret al., Scaling of the quantum anomalous Hall effect as an indicator of axion electrodynamics, Phys

S. Graueret al., Scaling of the quantum anomalous Hall effect as an indicator of axion electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 246801 (2017)

work page 2017
[11]

M.Mogiet al., Magneticmodulationdopingintopologicalinsulators toward higher-temperature quantum anomalous Hall effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 182401 (2015)

work page 2015
[12]

C.Zhanget al.,Zero-fieldchiraledgetransportinanintrinsicmagnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Nat. Commun. 16, 5587 (2025)

work page 2025
[13]

N. J. Huanget al., Quantum anomalous Hall effect for metrology, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 040501 (2025)

work page 2025
[14]

Saatjianet al., Quantum decoherence by magnetic fluctuations in a magnetic topological insulator, npj Quantum Mater

R. Saatjianet al., Quantum decoherence by magnetic fluctuations in a magnetic topological insulator, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 81 (2025)

work page 2025
[15]

Banerjeeet al., Materials for quantum technologies: a roadmap for spin and topology, Appl

N. Banerjeeet al., Materials for quantum technologies: a roadmap for spin and topology, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 041328 (2025)

work page 2025
[16]

Smejkal, J

L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferro- magnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022
[17]

Smejkal, A

L. Smejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jung- wirth,AnomalousHallantiferromagnets,Nat.Rev.Mater.7,482–496 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Songet al., Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat

C. Songet al., Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 473–485 (2025)

work page 2025
[19]

I. I. Mazinet al., Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021). 5

work page 2021
[20]

I. I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of funda- mental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

work page 2022
[21]

L.Smejkal,J.Sinova,andT.Jungwirth,Emergingresearchlandscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

work page 2022
[22]

Cheong and F.-T

S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism classification, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 38 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00756-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00756-5 2025
[23]

J.Krempaskýet al.,AltermagneticliftingofKramersspindegeneracy, Nature 626, 517–522 (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Reimerset al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat

S. Reimerset al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

Jianget al., A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat

B. Jianget al., A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754–759 (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

Liuet al., Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor, Phys

L.-S. Liuet al., Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 106301 (2026), doi:10.1103/j3qj-77yj

work page doi:10.1103/j3qj-77yj 2026
[27]

Q. Wang, R. Wu, and J. Hu, Spin-biased quantum spin Hall effect in altermagnetic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 113, L161101 (2026), doi:10.1103/kqwx-v6jv

work page doi:10.1103/kqwx-v6jv 2026
[28]

Keßleret al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from 𝜇SR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

P. Keßleret al., Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from 𝜇SR spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

Hiraishiet al., Nonmagnetic ground state in RuO2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Phys

M. Hiraishiet al., Nonmagnetic ground state in RuO2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166702 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Smolyanyuk, I

A. Smolyanyuk, I. I. Mazin, L. Garcia-Gassull, and R. Valentí, Fragility of the magnetic order in the prototypical altermagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134424 (2024)

work page 2024
[31]

M. M. Otrokovet al., Prediction and observation of an antiferromag- netic topological insulator, Nature 576, 416–422 (2019)

work page 2019
[32]

Layer Hall effect induced by altermagnetism

F. Qin and R. Chen, Layer Hall effect induced by altermagnetism, arXiv:2601.03937 (2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[33]

Liet al., Manipulating anomalous transport via crystal symmetry in two-dimensional altermagnetic systems, arXiv:2601.01564 (2026)

D. Liet al., Manipulating anomalous transport via crystal symmetry in two-dimensional altermagnetic systems, arXiv:2601.01564 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[34]

M. B. Tagani, A. Fakhredine, and C. Autieri, Quantum anoma- lous Hall conductivity in altermagnets under applied magnetic field, arXiv:2604.01948 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[35]

Chenet al., Tailoring topological altermagnetic spin texture via interfacialexchangecouplinginquasi-2DCrSb/(Bi,Sb) 2Te3 thinfilm, Nat

P. Chenet al., Tailoring topological altermagnetic spin texture via interfacialexchangecouplinginquasi-2DCrSb/(Bi,Sb) 2Te3 thinfilm, Nat. Commun. (2026), doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72021-7

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72021-7 2026
[36]

Zhuet al., Altermagnetic proximity effect, Phys

Z. Zhuet al., Altermagnetic proximity effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 186702 (2026), doi:10.1103/kqy8-myz1

work page doi:10.1103/kqy8-myz1 2026
[37]

Jiang, S

X. Jiang, S. A. A. Ghorashi, D. Lu, and J. Cano, Altermagnetism induced surface Chern insulator, Nano Lett. 26, 1327–1333 (2026)

work page 2026
[38]

Weiet al., La 2O3Mn2Se2: a correlated insulating layered d-wave altermagnet, Phys

C.-C. Weiet al., La 2O3Mn2Se2: a correlated insulating layered d-wave altermagnet, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 024402 (2025)

work page 2025
[39]

Brekke, A

B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbo, Two-dimensional altermagnets: superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023)

work page 2023
[40]

Kaushal and M

N. Kaushal and M. Franz, Altermagnetism in modified Lieb lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 156502 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

Durrnagelet al., Altermagnetic phase transition in a Lieb metal, Phys

M. Durrnagelet al., Altermagnetic phase transition in a Lieb metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036502 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

Wuet al., Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal, Science 359, 76–79 (2018)

S. Wuet al., Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal, Science 359, 76–79 (2018)

work page 2018
[43]

J. Liu, X. Qian, and L. Fu, Crystal field effect induced topological crystalline insulators in monolayer IV–VI semiconductors, Nano Lett. 15, 2657–2661 (2015)

work page 2015
[44]

D. Wang, H. Wang, L. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Electric-field- induced switchable two-dimensional altermagnets, Nano Lett. 25, 498–503 (2025), doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05384

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05384 2025
[45]

Z. Li, Z. Li, and Z. Qiao, Altermagnetism-induced topological phase transitionsintheKane–Melemodel,Phys.Rev.B111,155303(2025)

work page 2025
[46]

Weiet al., The switchable quantum anomalous Hall effect and altermagnetism in Janus monolayer and bilayer V2WS2Se2, J

Y. Weiet al., The switchable quantum anomalous Hall effect and altermagnetism in Janus monolayer and bilayer V2WS2Se2, J. Mater. Chem. C 13, 21498–21508 (2025), doi:10.1039/D5TC02517F

work page doi:10.1039/d5tc02517f 2025
[47]

Zouet al., Floquet quantum anomalous Hall effect with in-plane magnetizationintwo-dimensionalaltermagnets,ACSNano19,35575– 35580 (2025), doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10277

X. Zouet al., Floquet quantum anomalous Hall effect with in-plane magnetizationintwo-dimensionalaltermagnets,ACSNano19,35575– 35580 (2025), doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10277

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10277 2025
[48]

Chenet al., Altermagnets enable gate-switchable helical and chiral topological transport with spin–valley–momentum-locked dual protection, arXiv:2603.06487 (2026)

X. Chenet al., Altermagnets enable gate-switchable helical and chiral topological transport with spin–valley–momentum-locked dual protection, arXiv:2603.06487 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[49]

134, 106802 (2025)

M.Guet al.,Ferroelectricswitchablealtermagnetism,Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

work page 2025
[50]

Duanet al., Antiferroelectric altermagnets: antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Phys

X. Duanet al., Antiferroelectric altermagnets: antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106801 (2025)

work page 2025
[51]

Penget al., Ferroelastic altermagnetism, npj Quantum Mater

R. Penget al., Ferroelastic altermagnetism, npj Quantum Mater. 11, 5 (2026), doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00835-7

work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00835-7 2026
[52]

S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermagnetic routes to Majorana modes in zero net magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106601 (2024)

work page 2024
[53]

G. Z. X. Yang, Z.-T. Sun, Y.-M. Xie, and K. T. Law, Topologi- cal altermagnetic Josephson junctions, npj Quantum Mater. (2026), doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00874-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00874-8 2026
[54]

Jasiewicz, P

K. Jasiewicz, P. Wójcik, M. P. Nowak, and M. Zegrodnik, Interplay between altermagnetism and superconductivity in two dimensions: intertwined symmetries and singlet–triplet mixing, npj Quantum Mater. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00840-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00840-w 2025
[55]

P.Chatterjeeet al.,Interplaybetweenaltermagnetismandtopological superconductivity on an unconventional superconducting platform, Phys. Rev. B 112, 054503 (2025)

work page 2025
[56]

D. Wang, A. K. Ghosh, Y. Tao, F. Ma, and C. Song, Emerging anomaloushigher-ordertopologicalphasesinaltermagnet/topological- insulatorheterostructurebyFloquetengineering,Adv.Sci.13,e22203 (2026), doi:10.1002/advs.202522203

work page doi:10.1002/advs.202522203 2026
[57]

Anomalous thermoelectric and thermal Hall effects in irradiated altermagnets

F. Qin and X.-B. Qiang, Anomalous thermoelectric and thermal Hall effects in irradiated altermagnets, arXiv:2602.05745 (2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[58]

Caro and F

C. Caro and F. Gamez, Phase-rotated altermagnets as Chern valves for topological transport, arXiv:2510.24294 (2025). 6

work page arXiv 2025