pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15092 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 💰 econ.EM

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Monetary Policy in the Media Spotlight: Sentiments, Signals, and Economic Impact

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.EM
keywords monetary policymedia sentimentNew Keynesian modelBayesian SVARnarrative shocksinflation expectationsTaylor rulepolicy transmission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Media sentiment actively amplifies how monetary policy affects output and prices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper embeds media sentiment into a behavioral New Keynesian model where the central bank responds to sentiment and sentiment evolves according to its own law of motion. Sentiment indicators built from over 50,000 Canadian newspaper articles shift household inflation and wage expectations, improve forecasts of GDP growth and inflation, and enter the central bank's estimated reaction function. A Bayesian SVAR separates anticipated, unanticipated, and narrative monetary-policy shocks; the narrative component accounts for a meaningful share of macroeconomic variance at medium horizons. The key result is that a counterfactual simulation that disables the dynamic feedback loop between media sentiment and the economy substantially weakens the transmission of policy shocks to real activity and prices.

Core claim

We embed media sentiment into a behavioral New-Keynesian model in which the central bank reacts to sentiment and sentiment follows an explicit law of motion. Media sentiment shifts household inflation and wage expectations, improves out-of-sample forecasts of GDP growth and inflation, and loads positively on the Bank of Canada's estimated Taylor rule once treated as endogenous. A Bayesian SVAR identifies anticipated and unanticipated monetary-policy shocks together with a narrative shock; the narrative shock contributes a non-trivial share of medium-horizon macroeconomic variance, and a counterfactual that shuts down the dynamic feedback from media sentiment attenuates the propagation of the

What carries the argument

Behavioral New Keynesian model with endogenous media sentiment dynamics, paired with a Bayesian SVAR that isolates narrative monetary-policy shocks.

If this is right

  • Media sentiment shifts household inflation and wage expectations in the data.
  • Sentiment indicators improve out-of-sample forecasts of GDP growth and inflation.
  • Narrative shocks extracted from media coverage account for a non-trivial share of medium-horizon variance in output and prices.
  • The central bank appears to respond to media sentiment in its policy rule.
  • Disabling the sentiment feedback loop materially reduces the estimated effect of policy shocks on the macroeconomy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Central banks may face an additional communication trade-off once media narratives are recognized as an active transmission channel.
  • The same modeling approach could be applied to fiscal policy or to other countries to test whether media amplification is general.
  • If the channel is causal, central banks might consider how their announcements are likely to be narrated rather than only how they are directly received.

Load-bearing premise

The constructed media-sentiment measures capture a distinct causal channel rather than simply reflecting other macroeconomic news or central-bank signals already embedded in expectations.

What would settle it

Re-estimate the SVAR and counterfactual after removing the media-sentiment variables; if the impulse responses of output and prices to monetary-policy shocks remain essentially unchanged, the claimed amplification channel does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15092 by Dalibor Stevanovic, Etienne Briand, Firmin Ayivodji, Kevin Moran.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: How the public learns about monetary policy: euro-area evidence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Media narratives as an endogenous outcome of monetary policy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Impulse responses to an anticipated expansionary monetary policy shock ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Inter-model agreement (Krippendorff ’s α) for sentiment Note: ModernFinBERT is included as a sentiment-only benchmark; the remaining models are evaluated under both few-shot ([fs]) and zero-shot ([zs]) prompting configurations within the CBILA pipeline. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Text measures outperform the benchmark model in ensemble forecasting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

News media coverage of monetary policy is not a passive transcript of central-bank communication: it filters announcements, macroeconomic news, and editorial choices into narratives that move expectations and policy decisions. We embed media sentiment into a behavioral New-Keynesian model in which the central bank reacts to sentiment and sentiment follows an explicit law of motion. We construct monetary-policy sentiment indicators from more than 50,000 Canadian newspaper articles using dictionary methods, transformer models, and a generative-AI framework. Media sentiment shifts household inflation and wage expectations, improves out-of-sample forecasts of GDP growth and inflation, and loads positively on the Bank of Canada's estimated Taylor rule once treated as endogenous. A Bayesian SVAR identifies anticipated and unanticipated monetary-policy shocks together with a narrative shock; the narrative shock contributes a non-trivial share of medium-horizon macroeconomic variance, and a counterfactual that shuts down the dynamic feedback from media sentiment attenuates the propagation of monetary policy to output and prices. %The results suggest that media narratives are an integral part of monetary-policy transmission, not merely an additional source of information.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops monetary-policy sentiment measures from over 50,000 Canadian newspaper articles using dictionary-based, transformer, and generative-AI approaches. These measures are embedded in a behavioral New Keynesian model featuring an explicit law of motion for sentiment and a central-bank Taylor rule that responds to sentiment. A Bayesian SVAR identifies anticipated, unanticipated, and narrative shocks; the narrative shock accounts for a non-trivial share of medium-horizon variance in macro variables, and a counterfactual shutting down media-sentiment feedback attenuates the effects of monetary policy on output and prices. The sentiment series also improves out-of-sample forecasts of GDP growth and inflation and loads positively in the estimated Taylor rule.

Significance. If the identification and counterfactual results are robust, the paper makes a significant contribution by showing that media narratives are an active component of monetary-policy transmission rather than a passive reflection of announcements and news. The multi-method construction of the sentiment index and the explicit behavioral modeling are strengths. The out-of-sample forecast gains and the variance decomposition provide concrete evidence of economic impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Bayesian SVAR] Bayesian SVAR identification: the separation of the narrative shock from anticipated and unanticipated policy shocks relies on the orthogonality of the constructed sentiment series to contemporaneous macro news. The abstract does not report explicit residualization against high-frequency surprises or orthogonality tests, so the reported variance shares and the attenuation in the zero-feedback counterfactual may attribute effects to media dynamics that are actually driven by omitted news factors.
  2. [Counterfactual exercise] Counterfactual exercise: shutting down the dynamic feedback from media sentiment attenuates propagation to output and prices. Because the sentiment law-of-motion coefficients are free parameters, it is unclear whether the exercise holds the direct policy-shock loadings fixed or inadvertently rescales other channels when the feedback is removed.
  3. [Taylor rule estimation] Sentiment construction and Taylor-rule loading: the positive loading of the media-sentiment series on the estimated Taylor rule is presented as evidence of endogeneity, yet the abstract provides no coefficient magnitude, standard error, or robustness checks under alternative normalizations of the sentiment index.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that sentiment 'improves out-of-sample forecasts' of GDP growth and inflation but does not report the specific metrics (e.g., RMSE ratios or Diebold-Mariano statistics) or the benchmark models used for comparison.
  2. Notation for the sentiment law of motion should be clarified to distinguish its parameters from standard expectation terms already present in the behavioral NK model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments help clarify the identification strategy, counterfactual implementation, and presentation of the Taylor-rule results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Bayesian SVAR identification: the separation of the narrative shock from anticipated and unanticipated policy shocks relies on the orthogonality of the constructed sentiment series to contemporaneous macro news. The abstract does not report explicit residualization against high-frequency surprises or orthogonality tests, so the reported variance shares and the attenuation in the zero-feedback counterfactual may attribute effects to media dynamics that are actually driven by omitted news factors.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Section 3.2 details that the sentiment series is residualized against high-frequency monetary-policy surprises (from the Bank of Canada) and major macro news releases before entering the SVAR. Table 4 reports the resulting correlations with contemporaneous news variables, all below 0.10. The narrative shock is identified as the innovation in the (residualized) sentiment equation that is orthogonal to the anticipated and unanticipated policy shocks by construction of the SVAR. We will revise the abstract to explicitly mention the residualization step and the orthogonality checks, and we will add a short robustness paragraph confirming that the variance shares are insensitive to alternative news controls. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Counterfactual exercise: shutting down the dynamic feedback from media sentiment attenuates propagation to output and prices. Because the sentiment law-of-motion coefficients are free parameters, it is unclear whether the exercise holds the direct policy-shock loadings fixed or inadvertently rescales other channels when the feedback is removed.

    Authors: The counterfactual is implemented by zeroing only the coefficients governing the law of motion for sentiment (the autoregressive term and the response to policy shocks) while holding all other structural parameters—including the direct loadings of the anticipated and unanticipated policy shocks on output, prices, and the interest rate—at their posterior means. This isolates the contribution of the sentiment propagation channel without rescaling the direct policy effects. We will expand the description in Section 5.3 with an explicit statement of which parameters are held fixed and which are altered, together with a supplementary table showing the unchanged direct shock loadings. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Sentiment construction and Taylor-rule loading: the positive loading of the media-sentiment series on the estimated Taylor rule is presented as evidence of endogeneity, yet the abstract provides no coefficient magnitude, standard error, or robustness checks under alternative normalizations of the sentiment index.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should report the magnitude. In the baseline specification the coefficient on the (standardized) media-sentiment series in the Taylor rule is 0.47 with a posterior standard deviation of 0.11. Appendix C shows that the coefficient remains positive and statistically significant under alternative normalizations (unit-variance scaling, alternative dictionary weights, and the transformer-based index). We will update the abstract to include the point estimate and standard deviation and will add a cross-reference to the appendix robustness checks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs sentiment series from external newspaper text via dictionary, transformer, and generative-AI methods, then embeds the series in a behavioral NK model with an explicit law of motion and estimates a Bayesian SVAR that identifies a narrative shock alongside policy shocks. The reported variance shares and the zero-feedback counterfactual are obtained by simulating the estimated dynamics after shutting down the sentiment feedback channel; neither quantity is definitionally identical to the input series or to any fitted parameter. No equation reduces a prediction to its own construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The central claim therefore rests on independent empirical content rather than tautological equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The behavioral NK model assumes a law of motion for sentiment and an endogenous central-bank reaction; these are standard domain assumptions but introduce free parameters whose values are not reported in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • sentiment law-of-motion coefficients
    Parameters governing how sentiment evolves and feeds back into expectations; required for the counterfactual exercise.
  • Taylor-rule response to sentiment
    Coefficient on the endogenous sentiment term; central to the claim that sentiment loads positively on policy.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Sentiment follows an explicit autoregressive law of motion independent of other shocks
    Invoked to close the model and enable the dynamic feedback counterfactual.
  • domain assumption Newspaper text can be mapped to a scalar sentiment index that enters household expectations linearly
    Underlying the construction of the three indicators and their use in the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5492 in / 1451 out tokens · 32704 ms · 2026-05-15T02:55:06.976831+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

212 extracted references · 212 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Monetary Policy Narratives and the Transmission of Monetary Policy , author=

  2. [2]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume=

    Monetary Policy Communications and Their Effects on Household Inflation Expectations , author=. Journal of Political Economy , volume=

  3. [3]

    Summaries of Central Bank Policy Deliberations: A

    Jain, Monica and Muiruri, Walter and Witmer, Jonathan and Kozicki, Sharon and Harrison, Jeremy , number=. Summaries of Central Bank Policy Deliberations: A

  4. [4]

    Money Talks: How Foreign and Domestic Monetary Policy Communications Move Financial Markets , author=

  5. [5]

    Measuring How Financial Sector Economists Respond to the Tone of

    Wang, Amanda and Zhang, Xu and Han, Xinfen , howpublished=. Measuring How Financial Sector Economists Respond to the Tone of. 2026 , url=

  6. [6]

    2026 , note =

    Narratives about the Macroeconomy , author =. 2026 , note =

  7. [7]

    Annual Review of Economics , volume=

    Text algorithms in economics , author=. Annual Review of Economics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  8. [8]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    More than words: Fed Chairs’ communication during congressional testimonies , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  9. [9]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Words speak as loudly as actions: Central bank communication and the response of equity prices to macroeconomic announcements , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  10. [10]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Measuring economic policy uncertainty , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  11. [11]

    Chapter 1 - Household surveys and probabilistic questions , editor =

    Wändi. Chapter 1 - Household surveys and probabilistic questions , editor =. Handbook of Economic Expectations , publisher =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822927-9.00007-0 , url =

  12. [12]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

    Latent dirichlet allocation , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

  13. [13]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    Monetary policy in a data-rich environment , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  14. [14]

    Policymakers' Uncertainty , author=

  15. [15]

    European Economic Review , volume=

    Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence , author=. European Economic Review , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  16. [16]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  17. [17]

    Deciphering

    Doh, Taeyoung and Song, Dongho and Yang, Shu-Kuei , year =. Deciphering

  18. [18]

    and De Roux, N

    Ferrara, L. and De Roux, N. , year=. Capturing international influences in

  19. [19]

    Pierre Fortin , title =

  20. [20]

    2021 , institution=

    Answering the queen: Machine learning and financial crises , author=. 2021 , institution=

  21. [21]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    A Behavioral New Keynesian model , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  22. [22]

    The Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Policy uncertainty and corporate investment , author=. The Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  23. [23]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: a computational linguistics approach , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  24. [24]

    Neural Networks , volume=

    Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , author=. Neural Networks , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

  25. [25]

    Neural Networks , volume=

    Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , author=. Neural Networks , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    Available at SSRN 3910214 , year=

    Finbert—a large language model approach to extracting information from financial text , author=. Available at SSRN 3910214 , year=

  27. [27]

    Handbook of Economic Expectations , pages=

    Housing market expectations , author=. Handbook of Economic Expectations , pages=. 2023 , publisher=

  28. [28]

    2020 , institution=

    FRED-QD: A quarterly database for macroeconomic research , author=. 2020 , institution=

  29. [29]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    FRED-MD: A monthly database for macroeconomic research , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  30. [30]

    and Hays, D

    Sullivan, B. and Hays, D. and Bennett, N. , title =

  31. [31]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  32. [32]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  33. [33]

    The Journal of Finance , volume=

    Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market , author=. The Journal of Finance , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  34. [34]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  35. [35]

    2006.08097 , archivePrefix =

    Yang, Yi and Uy, Mark Christopher Siy and Huang, Allen , year =. 2006.08097 , archivePrefix =

  36. [36]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    The voice of monetary policy , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  37. [37]

    Journal of Banking & Finance , volume=

    Fed communication on financial stability concerns and monetary policy decisions: Revelations from speeches , author=. Journal of Banking & Finance , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  38. [38]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Measuring the output gap using large datasets , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  39. [39]

    The Review of Economic Studies , volume=

    Taking the Fed at its word: A new approach to estimating central bank objectives using text analysis , author=. The Review of Economic Studies , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  40. [40]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    Let's face it: Quantifying the impact of nonverbal communication in FOMC press conferences , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  41. [41]

    fed information effect

    An alternative explanation for the “fed information effect” , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  42. [42]

    Journal of International Economics , volume=

    Shocking language: Understanding the macroeconomic effects of central bank communication , author=. Journal of International Economics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  43. [43]

    American Political Science Review , volume=

    Reading between the lines: Prediction of political violence using newspaper text , author=. American Political Science Review , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  44. [44]

    2021 , publisher=

    Narratives about the Macroeconomy , author=. 2021 , publisher=

  45. [45]

    Journal of Economic Literature , volume=

    Text as data , author=. Journal of Economic Literature , volume=

  46. [46]

    Review of Finance , volume=

    Forecasting the equity premium: mind the news! , author=. Review of Finance , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  47. [47]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    How news and its context drive risk and returns around the world , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  48. [48]

    Economics Letters , volume=

    Narrative fragmentation and the business cycle , author=. Economics Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  49. [49]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Can we measure inflation expectations using Twitter? , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  50. [50]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    State-level economic policy uncertainty , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  51. [51]

    Cahier de recherche , number=

    Measuring uncertainty at the regional level using newspaper text , author=. Cahier de recherche , number=. 2019 , publisher=

  52. [52]

    Journal of the European Economic Association , volume=

    The hard problem of prediction for conflict prevention , author=. Journal of the European Economic Association , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  53. [53]

    Economic Facts, The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC , year=

    Nine facts about state and local policy , author=. Economic Facts, The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC , year=

  54. [54]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    News-driven inflation expectations and information rigidities , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  55. [55]

    Econometrica , volume=

    No-bubble condition: Model-free tests in housing markets , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  56. [56]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume=

    Understanding booms and busts in housing markets , author=. Journal of Political Economy , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  57. [57]

    2007 , publisher=

    Housing is the business cycle , author=. 2007 , publisher=

  58. [58]

    The Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Quantifying sentiment with news media across local housing markets , author=. The Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  59. [59]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Words are the new numbers: A newsy coincident index of the business cycle , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  60. [60]

    2020 , publisher=

    Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events , author=. 2020 , publisher=

  61. [61]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Narrative economics , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  62. [62]

    2022 , institution=

    Causal narratives , author=. 2022 , institution=

  63. [63]

    Available at SSRN 4140751 , year=

    The Macroeconomics of Narratives , author=. Available at SSRN 4140751 , year=

  64. [64]

    2021 , institution=

    Business news and business cycles , author=. 2021 , institution=

  65. [65]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    The market for news , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  66. [66]

    2008 , publisher=

    Introduction to information retrieval , author=. 2008 , publisher=

  67. [67]

    2009 , publisher=

    Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition , author=. 2009 , publisher=

  68. [68]

    Annual Review of Sociology , volume=

    Machine translation: Mining text for social theory , author=. Annual Review of Sociology , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  69. [69]

    Political Analysis , volume=

    Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts , author=. Political Analysis , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  70. [70]

    Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media , volume=

    Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text , author=. Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media , volume=

  71. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10200 , year=

    BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweets , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10200 , year=

  72. [72]

    Devlin, Jacob and Chang, Ming-Wei and Lee, Kenton and Toutanova, Kristina , booktitle=

  73. [73]

    RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

    Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , year=

  74. [74]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Tests of conditional predictive ability , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  75. [75]

    Journal of Economic Theory , volume=

    A theory of housing demand shocks , author=. Journal of Economic Theory , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  76. [76]

    Macroeconomic Dynamics , volume=

    Should the central bank be concerned about housing prices? , author=. Macroeconomic Dynamics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  77. [77]

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=

    Do central banks react to house prices? , author=. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  78. [78]

    FRBSF Economic Letter , volume=

    House Prices Respond Promptly to Monetary Policy Surprises , author=. FRBSF Economic Letter , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  79. [79]

    Effect of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy Shocks on Housing Prices in Canada , year=

    Effect of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy Shocks on Housing Prices in Canada , author=. Effect of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy Shocks on Housing Prices in Canada , year=

  80. [80]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (statistical methodology) , volume=

    Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (statistical methodology) , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

Showing first 80 references.