pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15189 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Strong Gravitational Lensing with the James Webb Space Telescope

Adi Zitrin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords strong gravitational lensingJames Webb Space TelescopeJWSTdark matterdistant galaxiesgravitational lensinghigh-redshift sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong gravitational lensing with JWST now permits detailed study of distant sources at levels previously unreachable.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how strong gravitational lensing bends light from background galaxies around foreground massive objects such as clusters, producing magnified and multiple images. This magnification reveals faint details in distant sources and helps map the invisible dark matter that dominates the lensing bodies. Historical examples from solar eclipses to Hubble observations established lensing as a standard tool, and the review argues that JWST's improved resolution and sensitivity extend these capabilities to fainter and farther objects. The summary covers recent applications and outlines near-term prospects for lensing programs with the new telescope.

Core claim

Strong gravitational lensing, where foreground mass curves spacetime and deflects light into magnified multiple images of background sources, combined with JWST's capabilities, now enables observation, detection, and study of distant sources like never before, extending prior uses of lensing to probe dark matter distributions and high-redshift galaxies.

What carries the argument

Strong gravitational lensing, the deflection of light by massive foreground galaxies or clusters that creates substantially magnified and multiply imaged background sources.

If this is right

  • Higher-resolution images of magnified distant galaxies become routinely available for detailed morphological and spectroscopic analysis.
  • Improved constraints on the dark matter content of lensing clusters and galaxies follow from better modeling of multiple images.
  • Detection of fainter and more distant objects than possible with prior facilities extends the reach of studies of the early universe.
  • Multiple images of the same variable or transient source allow cross-verification of distances and time-delay measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Statistical samples from many lensed fields could tighten limits on the abundance of low-mass dark matter halos.
  • Lensed transients detected with JWST might provide independent routes to measure the Hubble constant via time delays.
  • The same data could test whether current lens models systematically underpredict magnifications at the highest redshifts.

Load-bearing premise

That JWST will deliver the expected magnification, resolution, and sensitivity gains for lensing studies without major unforeseen observational or modeling limitations.

What would settle it

JWST lensing fields that fail to yield the predicted increase in detected high-redshift sources or show large systematic mismatches between observed image positions and lens models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15189 by Adi Zitrin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Qualitative description of a magnifying glass. (a) Ray diagram for a convex lens. Parallel rays are focused onto a focal point after passing through the lens, marked here on each side of the lens. (b) Demonstration of why a magnifying glass magnifies. Light rays from the source to the observer are marked with green solid lines. To the observer – the eye depicted in the figure – the rays arrive from a wider… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Examples of lensing. Upper row: Image formation by an elliptical lens. The critical curves of the (invisible) lens are shown in white, and their corresponding caustics in red. We plant a source between the outer and inner caustics, as seen in the subfigure on the left, which after lensing results in the image distribution seen in the subfigure on the right. Note, only parts of the source sitting within the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: One of the deepest fields imaged with JWST/NIRCam to date, the lensing cluster AS16063. Image was taken as part of the GLIMPSE survey [62], reaching about 31 AB magnitudes per band before accounting for lensing magnification. In the centre of the image lies the brightest cluster galaxy, marked with an ”X”, sitting at the heart of the cluster’s potential well and thus lensing centre. Around it are seen mult… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Deep view of the faint end of the luminosity function allowed by JWST+Lensing. The upper subfigure shows the luminosity function derived from very-deep observations of the lensing cluster AS1063 taken for the JWST/GLIMPSE program (seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Compilation of high-redshift galaxies from the literature. Figure is taken from [130]; see references therein. Note the prominent contribution of lensing to high-redshift galaxy detection and the numerous galaxies now detected and spectroscopically confirmed with JWST beyond the limits allowed by HST (z ∼ 11). 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: JWST revealed an unexpected population of faint AGN. Left: Image of the lensing cluster Abell 2744 taken as part of the UNCOVER JWST survey (Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, I. Labbe, R. Bezanson, L. Furtak, A. Zitrin; figure from [146]). A distinct, triply imaged red and compact source was detected, labelled QSO1. Despite large magnification and shear, it remained a point source over its three images suggesting a … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: JWST allows to resolve the sphere of influence around strongly magnified SMBHs in the early universe, enabling a direct dynamical mass measurement. The Figure, taken from [159], shows the Hα velocity field around A2744-QSO1 using NIRSpec integral field observations. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Compilation of strongly lensed LRDs. Each column shows a different system of a multiply imaged LRD (see [146,164,167–169]). The stamps were constructed here from public data and their sizes arbitrary. As can be seen, LRDs maintain a point-like appearance despite significant magnification, which places strong constraints on their physical size. Some of the LRDs have also a notable, nearby companion. NIRSpec… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: JWST observes disk and spiral galaxies farther than ever before. From left to right, the subfigures show the Big Wheel galaxy at z = 3.25 ([176]; not gravitationally lensed); galaxy Alaknanda, at z ≃ 4 ([177]; moderately gravitationally magnified by the galaxy cluster Abell 2744); galaxy Charybdis at z ∼ 3.6 – an apparently spiral galaxy strongly lensed and triply imaged by the galaxy cluster MACS J1931.8-… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Collage of star-forming clumps, globular clusters, and highly magnified arcs seen with JWST throughout cosmic history. Shown here are example arcs and clumps up to redshift z ∼ 11 complied from the literature [119,183–189] or from various lensing surveys [62,115,116], and constructed here from publicly available data (Credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA). Many of these clumps and point sources could not be resol… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: JWST can obtain spectra of stars at large cosmological distances. The upper panel shows two lensed star candidates next to the critical curves position (dashed lines) in an arc at z ∼ 4.8, detected in JWST/NIRCam observations [200]. Counter images of various knots are marked with blue arrows, some of them also circled and numbered. The two middle panels show the total and the host’s JWST/NIRSpec spectrum,… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The first gravitational arc, seen in Abell 370 and now dubbed the Dragon, imaged with JWST. Imaging at two different epochs revealed over 40 transient point sources – stars in the background spiral galaxy sitting near the caustics and getting temporarily, highly magnified. The bottom panels show a portion of the arc at the different two epochs, and marked in (dashed) half-crosses are the locations of sour… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Multiply imaged supernovae detected with JWST. Upper row, Left: Supernovae H0PE at z = 1.78 [223]. Middle: Supernovae Encore at z = 1.95 [222]. Right: Supernova Eos – the farthest directly observed SN to date, at z = 5.13 [225]. A spectrum of the supernova was also taken, as seen in the lower panel, showing the relative flux per wavelength of the two supernova images, as well as their combined spectrum. T… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The theory of General Relativity predicts that, since massive bodies curve spacetime, light from a distant source would be deflected by a foreground massive object -- a phenomenon known as \emph{Gravitational Lensing}. Historically, the strength of deflection of light from background stars by the sun, during the 1919 solar eclipse, supplied one of the first proofs for the theory of General Relativity. However, it is only in the last few decades, with the advent of the Hubble Space Telescope and other large, ground-based facilities, that lensing has become a principal tool in modern astronomy. Lensing allows us to study both the matter content of the lensing bodies such as galaxies or clusters of galaxies, mainly dominated by the otherwise-invisible \emph{dark matter}, and the distant background sources that are being lensed by them. Strong gravitational lensing, where sources are substantially magnified and multiply imaged, is particularly useful to that end. The substantial magnification allows for a high-resolution view of the sources and to detect fainter and farther objects than would otherwise be possible; and image multiplicity helps in verifying the distance to them, and for studying variable or transient sources. Paired with the unprecedented capabilities of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), lensing now allows us to observe, detect, and study distant sources like never before. I summarise recent advances in strong-lensing applications and near-future prospects with JWST.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing the principles of strong gravitational lensing from general relativity, its historical validation, applications to studying dark matter in galaxies and clusters, and the magnification and multiplicity benefits for observing distant background sources. It concludes by highlighting near-future prospects when these established lensing techniques are paired with the James Webb Space Telescope's capabilities in resolution, sensitivity, and wavelength coverage.

Significance. If the descriptive overview holds, the paper provides a concise, accessible summary of established lensing applications that could serve as an entry point for researchers planning JWST observations. It correctly grounds claims in prior literature on Hubble-era lensing results without introducing new derivations, parameters, or predictions that would require internal validation.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The first-person phrasing ('I summarise') is acceptable in a review but could be revised to passive construction ('Recent advances... are summarised') to align with the formal tone of most astronomy journals.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit list of key recent JWST lensing papers cited, to make the 'recent advances' section more traceable for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. We are pleased that the review is viewed as a concise and accessible entry point for researchers planning JWST observations, correctly grounded in prior literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

This is a qualitative review paper with no derivations, equations, fitted parameters, quantitative predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce to internal inputs. The central claim is descriptive: JWST paired with strong lensing enables new observations of distant sources. It rests on established telescope specifications and prior literature rather than any self-referential construction. No steps qualify under the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard general relativity and prior observational results in gravitational lensing without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond established physics, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • standard math General Relativity predicts that massive bodies deflect light from distant sources
    Stated in the opening paragraph as the foundational principle for gravitational lensing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5548 in / 978 out tokens · 44525 ms · 2026-05-15T02:59:29.915959+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

239 extracted references · 239 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gravitational lensing: a unique probe of dark matter and dark energy

    Ellis RS. Gravitational lensing: a unique probe of dark matter and dark energy. Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2010;368(1914):967–987

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Introduction to gravitational lensing: With python examples

    Meneghetti M. Introduction to gravitational lensing: With python examples. Springer In- ternational Publishing; 2021. Lecture Notes in Physics; Available from:https://books. google.co.il/books?id=2HlMEAAAQBAJ

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation

    Einstein A. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1915 Jan;:844–847. 26

    work page 1915

  4. [4]

    Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie

    Einstein A. Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie. Annalen der Physik. 1916 Jan;354(7):769–822

    work page 1916

  5. [5]

    A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29,

    Dyson FW, Eddington AS, Davidson C. A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29,

    work page

  6. [6]

    1920 Jan; 220:291–333

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A. 1920 Jan; 220:291–333

    work page 1920

  7. [7]

    0957+561 A, B: twin quasistellar objects or grav- itational lens? Nature

    Walsh D, Carswell RF, Weymann RJ. 0957+561 A, B: twin quasistellar objects or grav- itational lens? Nature. 1979 May;279:381–384

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    2237+0305 : a new and unusual gravitational lens

    Huchra J, Gorenstein M, Kent S, et al. 2237+0305 : a new and unusual gravitational lens. Astron. J.. 1985 May;90:691–696

    work page 1985

  9. [9]

    Giant Luminous Arcs in Galaxy Clusters

    Lynds R, Petrosian V. Giant Luminous Arcs in Galaxy Clusters. In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society; Vol. 18; Sep.; 1986. p. 1014

    work page 1986

  10. [10]

    A blue ring-like structure, in the center of the A 370 cluster of galaxies

    Soucail G, Fort B, Mellier Y, et al. A blue ring-like structure, in the center of the A 370 cluster of galaxies. Astron. Astrophys.. 1987 Jan;172:L14–L16

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    Luminous Arcs in Clusters of Galaxies

    Lynds R, Petrosian V. Luminous Arcs in Clusters of Galaxies. Astrophys. J.. 1989 Jan; 336:1

    work page 1989

  12. [12]

    The giant arc in A 370 : spectroscopic evidence for gravitational lensing from a source at Z=0.724

    Soucail G, Mellier Y, Fort B, et al. The giant arc in A 370 : spectroscopic evidence for gravitational lensing from a source at Z=0.724. Astron. Astrophys.. 1988 Feb;191:L19– L21

    work page 1988

  13. [13]

    Giant luminous arcs discovered in two clusters of galaxies

    Paczynski B. Giant luminous arcs discovered in two clusters of galaxies. Nature. 1987 Feb;325(6105):572–573

    work page 1987

  14. [14]

    Detection of Systematic Gravitational Lens Galaxy Image Alignments: Mapping Dark Matter in Galaxy Clusters

    Tyson JA, Valdes F, Wenk RA. Detection of Systematic Gravitational Lens Galaxy Image Alignments: Mapping Dark Matter in Galaxy Clusters. Astrophys. J. Lett.. 1990 Jan;349:L1

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Mapping the Dark Matter with Weak Gravitational Lensing

    Kaiser N, Squires G. Mapping the Dark Matter with Weak Gravitational Lensing. As- trophys. J.. 1993 Feb;404:441

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    A Method for Weak Lensing Observations

    Kaiser N, Squires G, Broadhurst T. A Method for Weak Lensing Observations. Astro- phys. J.. 1995 Aug;449:460

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    The Distribution of Dark Matter in Distant Cluster Lenses - Modelling A:370

    Kneib JP, Mellier Y, Fort B, et al. The Distribution of Dark Matter in Distant Cluster Lenses - Modelling A:370. Astron. Astrophys.. 1993 Jun;273:367

    work page 1993

  18. [18]

    Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Lensing Cluster Abell 2218

    Kneib JP, Ellis RS, Smail I, et al. Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Lensing Cluster Abell 2218. Astrophys. J.. 1996 Nov;471:643

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    A Probable z˜7 Galaxy Strongly Lensed by the Rich Cluster A2218: Exploring the Dark Ages

    Kneib JP, Ellis RS, Santos MR, et al. A Probable z˜7 Galaxy Strongly Lensed by the Rich Cluster A2218: Exploring the Dark Ages. Astrophys. J.. 2004 Jun;607:697–703

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    A Hubble Space Telescope lensing survey of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters - IV

    Smith GP, Kneib JP, Smail I, et al. A Hubble Space Telescope lensing survey of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters - IV. Mass, structure and thermodynamics of cluster cores at z= 0.2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2005 May;359(2):417–446

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    Strong-Lensing Analysis of A1689 from Deep Advanced Camera Images

    Broadhurst T, Ben´ ıtez N, Coe D, et al. Strong-Lensing Analysis of A1689 from Deep Advanced Camera Images. Astrophys. J.. 2005 Mar;621:53–88

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    The Surprisingly Steep Mass Profile of A1689, from a Lensing Analysis of Subaru Images

    Broadhurst T, Takada M, Umetsu K, et al. The Surprisingly Steep Mass Profile of A1689, from a Lensing Analysis of Subaru Images. Astrophys. J. Lett.. 2005 Feb;619:L143–L146

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Parametric strong gravitational lensing analysis of Abell

    Halkola A, Seitz S, Pannella M. Parametric strong gravitational lensing analysis of Abell

    work page

  24. [24]

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2006 Nov;372:1425–1462

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Multiscale cluster lens mass mapping - I

    Jullo E, Kneib JP. Multiscale cluster lens mass mapping - I. Strong lensing modelling. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2009 May;395:1319–1332

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    A genetic algorithm for the non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems

    Liesenborgs J, De Rijcke S, Dejonghe H. A genetic algorithm for the non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2006 Apr;367:1209–1216

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    New multiply-lensed galaxies identified in ACS/NIC3 observations of Cl0024+1654 using an improved mass model

    Zitrin A, Broadhurst T, Umetsu K, et al. New multiply-lensed galaxies identified in ACS/NIC3 observations of Cl0024+1654 using an improved mass model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2009 Jul;396:1985–2002

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    MACS: A Quest for the Most Massive Galaxy Clusters in the Universe

    Ebeling H, Edge AC, Henry JP. MACS: A Quest for the Most Massive Galaxy Clusters in the Universe. Astrophys. J.. 2001 Jun;553:668–676

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    LoCuSS: first results from strong-lensing analysis of 20 massive galaxy clusters at z = 0.2

    Richard J, Smith GP, Kneib JP, et al. LoCuSS: first results from strong-lensing analysis of 20 massive galaxy clusters at z = 0.2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2010 May;404:325– 27 349

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    The Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble: An Overview

    Postman M, Coe D, Ben´ ıtez N, et al. The Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble: An Overview. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.. 2012 Apr;199:25

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey

    Coe D, Salmon B, Bradaˇ c M, et al. RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey. Astrophys. J.. 2019 Oct;884(1):85

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    A magnified young galaxy from about 500 million years after the Big Bang

    Zheng W, Postman M, Zitrin A, et al. A magnified young galaxy from about 500 million years after the Big Bang. Nature. 2012 Sep;489:406–408

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    CLASH: Three Strongly Lensed Images of a Candi- date z≈11 Galaxy

    Coe D, Zitrin A, Carrasco M, et al. CLASH: Three Strongly Lensed Images of a Candi- date z≈11 Galaxy. Astrophys. J.. 2013 Jan;762(1):32

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    The Frontier Fields: Survey Design and Initial Results

    Lotz JM, Koekemoer A, Coe D, et al. The Frontier Fields: Survey Design and Initial Results. Astrophys. J.. 2017 Mar;837:97

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    The Hidden Fortress: Structure and substructure of the complex strong lensing cluster SDSS J1029+2623

    Oguri M, Schrabback T, Jullo E, et al. The Hidden Fortress: Structure and substructure of the complex strong lensing cluster SDSS J1029+2623. arXiv. 2012 Sep;1209.0458

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    CLASH: The Concentration-Mass Relation of Galaxy Clusters

    Merten J, Meneghetti M, Postman M, et al. CLASH: The Concentration-Mass Relation of Galaxy Clusters. arXiv. 2014 Apr;1404.1376, ApJ in press

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    CLASH: Weak-lensing Shear-and- magnification Analysis of 20 Galaxy Clusters

    Umetsu K, Medezinski E, Nonino M, et al. CLASH: Weak-lensing Shear-and- magnification Analysis of 20 Galaxy Clusters. Astrophys. J.. 2014 Nov;795:163

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Cluster-Galaxy Weak Lensing

    Umetsu K. Cluster-Galaxy Weak Lensing. arXiv e-prints. 2020 Jul;:arXiv:2007.00506

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Weak-lensing analysis of SPT-selected galaxy clusters using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data

    Stern C, Dietrich JP, Bocquet S, et al. Weak-lensing analysis of SPT-selected galaxy clusters using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2019 May;485(1):69–87

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    PSZ2LenS

    Sereno M, Covone G, Izzo L, et al. PSZ2LenS. Weak lensing analysis of the Planck clusters in the CFHTLenS and in the RCSLenS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2017 Dec; 472(2):1946–1971

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses

    Hoekstra H, Herbonnet R, Muzzin A, et al. The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2015 May;449(1):685–714

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Weak lensing analysis of SZ-selected clusters of galaxies from the SPT and Planck surveys

    Gruen D, Seitz S, Brimioulle F, et al. Weak lensing analysis of SZ-selected clusters of galaxies from the SPT and Planck surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2014 Aug; 442(2):1507–1544

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experi- ment

    Udalski A, Szymanski M, Kaluzny J, et al. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experi- ment. Acta Astron.. 1992 Oct;42:253–284

    work page 1992

  44. [44]

    Microlensing Optical Depth toward the Galactic Bulge from Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics Group Observations during 2000 with Difference Image Analysis

    Sumi T, Abe F, Bond IA, et al. Microlensing Optical Depth toward the Galactic Bulge from Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics Group Observations during 2000 with Difference Image Analysis. Astrophys. J.. 2003 Jul;591(1):204–227

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    Limits on the Macho content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds

    Tisserand P, Le Guillou L, Afonso C, et al. Limits on the Macho content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds. Astron. Astrophys.. 2007 Jul; 469(2):387–404

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    Strong Lensing by Galaxies

    Treu T. Strong Lensing by Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.. 2010 Sep;48:87–125

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Observational aspects of gravitational lensing

    Surdej J. Observational aspects of gravitational lensing. In: Mellier Y, Fort B, Soucail G, editors. Gravitational lensing. Vol. 360; 1990. p. 57–72

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    The optical gravitational lens experiment

    Surdej J, Refsdal S, Pospieszalska-Surdej A. The optical gravitational lens experiment. In: Surdej J, Fraipont-Caro D, Gosset E, et al., editors. Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia; (Liege International Astrophysical Colloquia; Vol. 31); Jan.; 1993. p. 199

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    A new formulation of gravitational lens theory, time-delay, and Fermat’s principle

    Schneider P. A new formulation of gravitational lens theory, time-delay, and Fermat’s principle. Astron. Astrophys.. 1985 Feb;143:413–420

    work page 1985

  50. [50]

    Fermat’s principle, caustics, and the classification of gravita- tional lens images

    Blandford R, Narayan R. Fermat’s principle, caustics, and the classification of gravita- tional lens images. Astrophys. J.. 1986 Nov;310:568–582

    work page 1986

  51. [51]

    Lectures on Gravitational Lensing

    Narayan R, Bartelmann M. Lectures on Gravitational Lensing. ArXiv Astrophysics e- prints. 1996 Jun;astro-ph/9606001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  52. [52]

    Waves and thom’s theorem

    Berry M. Waves and thom’s theorem. Advances in Physics. 1976;25(1):1–26. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/00018737600101342

    work page doi:10.1080/00018737600101342 1976

  53. [53]

    Gravitational Lenses

    Schneider P, Ehlers J, Falco EE. Gravitational Lenses. ; 1992

    work page 1992

  54. [54]

    Cluster lenses

    Kneib JP, Natarajan P. Cluster lenses. Astron. Astrophys. Rev.. 2011 Nov;19:47. 28

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro; 2006

    Meylan G, Jetzer P, North P, et al., editors. Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro; 2006

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing

    Kaiser N, Squires G. Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing. Astro- phys. J.. 1993 Feb;404:441–450

    work page 1993

  57. [57]

    Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos

    Merritt D, Graham AW, Moore B, et al. Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models. Astron. J.. 2006 Dec;132(6):2685–2700

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Beyond the ultradeep frontier fields and legacy ob- servations (BUFFALO): a high-resolution strong+weak-lensing view of Abell 370

    Niemiec A, Jauzac M, Eckert D, et al. Beyond the ultradeep frontier fields and legacy ob- servations (BUFFALO): a high-resolution strong+weak-lensing view of Abell 370. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2023 Sep;524(2):2883–2910

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Weak Lensing with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data: The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function to 1 H−1 Mpc

    Fischer P, McKay TA, Sheldon E, et al. Weak Lensing with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data: The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function to 1 H−1 Mpc. Astron. J.. 2000 Sep;120(3):1198–1208

    work page 2000

  60. [60]

    Euclid: I

    Euclid Collaboration, Mellier Y, Abdurro’uf, et al. Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission. Astron. Astrophys.. 2025 May;697:A1

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    Ivezi´ cˇZ, Kahn SM, Tyson JA, et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J.. 2019 Mar;873(2):111

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Gravitational Microlensing by Double Stars and Planetary Systems

    Mao S, Paczynski B. Gravitational Microlensing by Double Stars and Planetary Systems. Astrophys. J. Lett.. 1991 Jun;374:L37

    work page 1991

  63. [63]

    Discovering Planetary Systems through Gravitational Microlenses

    Gould A, Loeb A. Discovering Planetary Systems through Gravitational Microlenses. Astrophys. J.. 1992 Sep;396:104

    work page 1992

  64. [64]

    JWST’s GLIMPSE: an overview of the deep- est probe of early galaxy formation and cosmic reionization

    Atek H, Chisholm J, Kokorev V, et al. JWST’s GLIMPSE: an overview of the deep- est probe of early galaxy formation and cosmic reionization. arXiv e-prints. 2025 Nov; :arXiv:2511.07542

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    The Largest Gravitational Lens: MACS J0717.5+3745 (z = 0.546)

    Zitrin A, Broadhurst T, Rephaeli Y, et al. The Largest Gravitational Lens: MACS J0717.5+3745 (z = 0.546). Astrophys. J. Lett.. 2009 Dec;707:L102–L106

    work page 2009

  66. [66]

    Non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems

    Diego JM, Protopapas P, Sandvik HB, et al. Non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2005 Jun;360:477–491

    work page 2005

  67. [67]

    Pixelated Lenses and H 0 from Time-Delay Quasars

    Williams LLR, Saha P. Pixelated Lenses and H 0 from Time-Delay Quasars. Astron. J.. 2000 Feb;119(2):439–450

    work page 2000

  68. [68]

    A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters

    Jullo E, Kneib JP, Limousin M, et al. A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters. New Journal of Physics. 2007 Dec;9:447

    work page 2007

  69. [69]

    Direct measurement of dark matter halo ellipticity from two-dimensional lensing shear maps of 25 massive clusters

    Oguri M, Takada M, Okabe N, et al. Direct measurement of dark matter halo ellipticity from two-dimensional lensing shear maps of 25 massive clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2010 Jul;405:2215–2230

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Cosmology with supernova Encore in the strong lensing cluster MACS J0138-2155: Lens model comparison and H0 measurement

    Suyu SH, Acebron A, Grillo C, et al. Cosmology with supernova Encore in the strong lensing cluster MACS J0138-2155: Lens model comparison and H0 measurement. arXiv e-prints. 2025 Sep;:arXiv:2509.12319

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Galaxy cluster strong lensing: image deflections from density fluctuations along the line of sight

    Host O. Galaxy cluster strong lensing: image deflections from density fluctuations along the line of sight. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2012 Feb;420:L18–L22

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    Enhanced cluster lensing models with measured galaxy kinematics

    Bergamini P, Rosati P, Mercurio A, et al. Enhanced cluster lensing models with measured galaxy kinematics. Astron. Astrophys.. 2019 Nov;631:A130

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    ”Refsdal” Meets Popper: Comparing Predictions of the Re-appearance of the Multiply Imaged Supernova Behind MACSJ1149.5+2223

    Treu T, Brammer G, Diego JM, et al. ”Refsdal” Meets Popper: Comparing Predictions of the Re-appearance of the Multiply Imaged Supernova Behind MACSJ1149.5+2223. Astrophys. J.. 2016 Jan;817:60

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project

    Meneghetti M, Natarajan P, Coe D, et al. The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2017 Dec;472(3):3177–3216

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    A Pair of Lensed Galaxies at z=4.92 in the Field of CL 1358+62

    Franx M, Illingworth GD, Kelson DD, et al. A Pair of Lensed Galaxies at z=4.92 in the Field of CL 1358+62. Astrophys. J. Lett.. 1997 Sep;486:L75

    work page 1997

  76. [76]

    Discovery of a possibly old galaxy at $z=6.027$, multiply imaged by the massive cluster Abell 383

    Richard J, Kneib J, Ebeling H, et al. Discovery of an old galaxy at z=6.027, multiply imaged by the massive cluster Abell 383. arXiv. 2011 Feb;1102.5092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    CLASH: z∼6 young galaxy candidate quintuply lensed by the frontier field cluster RXC J2248.7-4431

    Monna A, Seitz S, Greisel N, et al. CLASH: z∼6 young galaxy candidate quintuply lensed by the frontier field cluster RXC J2248.7-4431. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.. 2014 Feb;438:1417–1434. 29

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    A Geometrically Supported z ˜ 10 Candidate Multiply Imaged by the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster A2744

    Zitrin A, Zheng W, Broadhurst T, et al. A Geometrically Supported z ˜ 10 Candidate Multiply Imaged by the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster A2744. Astrophys. J. Lett.. 2014 Sep;793:L12

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Discovery of a Very Bright Strongly Lensed Galaxy Candidate at z ˜ 7.6

    Bradley LD, Bouwens RJ, Ford HC, et al. Discovery of a Very Bright Strongly Lensed Galaxy Candidate at z ˜ 7.6. Astrophys. J.. 2008 May;678:647–654

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    The Abundance of Star-forming Galaxies in the Redshift Range 8.5-12: New Results from the 2012 Hubble Ultra Deep Field Campaign

    Ellis RS, McLure RJ, Dunlop JS, et al. The Abundance of Star-forming Galaxies in the Redshift Range 8.5-12: New Results from the 2012 Hubble Ultra Deep Field Campaign. Astrophys. J. Lett.. 2013 Jan;763:L7

    work page 2012

Showing first 80 references.