pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15837 · v1 · pith:SHZJQD6Hnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🧮 math.AP

Large-data L²-decay for attractive-dissipative nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations without the strong dissipative condition

Naoyasu Kita , Hayato Miyazaki , Takuya Sato This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP MSC 35Q5535B40
keywords nonlinear Schrödinger equationdissipativeattractive nonlinearityL2 decayaugmented energyweighted energy spacepower nonlinearitylarge data
0
0 comments X

The pith

An augmented energy yields uniform H1 bounds and large-data L2 decay for attractive-dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equations in the full sharp range.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proves large-data L2 decay estimates for nonlinear Schrödinger equations with attractive-dissipative power nonlinearity. The key challenge is that the standard energy is not sign-definite when the nonlinear coefficient has negative real part, so it does not directly control the gradient. The authors add a positive multiple of the L2 norm, which decreases over time, to the energy functional. This creates an extra dissipative term that directly provides a uniform bound on the H1 norm for all time. As a result, the known decay rates apply to arbitrary data in the space of functions with both H1 and Fourier-H1 regularity, across the entire interval 1 < p ≤ 1 + 2/d and without the strong dissipative condition or prior size restrictions on p.

Core claim

We prove a large-data L²-decay estimate for nonlinear dissipative Schrödinger equations with attractive-dissipative power nonlinearity. The main difficulty is the lack of sign definiteness of the standard energy when Re λ <0, which prevents the usual energy argument from directly yielding a uniform gradient bound. We introduce an augmented energy, obtained by adding a suitable multiple of the decreasing L²-norm to the standard energy. This produces an additional dissipative term and gives a direct uniform-in-time H¹ bound without the iteration argument used in previous works. Consequently, for arbitrary initial data in the weighted energy space Σ = H¹ ∩ ℱH¹, we obtain the decay rate previous

What carries the argument

The augmented energy, created by adding a suitable positive multiple of the L² norm to the standard energy functional, which supplies an additional dissipative term for a direct uniform H¹ bound.

If this is right

  • The L² decay estimate holds for arbitrary initial data in Σ throughout 1 < p ≤ 1 + 2/d.
  • The uniform H¹ bound is obtained directly without iteration.
  • The previous restriction to p ≤ 1 + 4/(3d) is removed for the attractive-dissipative case.
  • The result matches the decay rate known under the strong dissipative condition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach of augmenting the energy might simplify analysis in other indefinite-energy dissipative systems.
  • Similar techniques could be tested on higher-order or nonlocal nonlinearities.
  • The direct bound could lead to improved scattering results or asymptotic profiles in related models.
  • Numerical experiments with initial data in Σ for p near 1+2/d could confirm the decay rates.

Load-bearing premise

There exists a suitable positive multiple of the decreasing L2 norm that adds enough dissipation to the energy to produce a uniform bound on the H1 norm directly.

What would settle it

A counterexample where the H1 norm of a solution with data in Σ becomes unbounded in time for some p with 1 + 4/(3d) < p ≤ 1 + 2/d would show the claim does not hold.

read the original abstract

We prove a large-data $L^2$-decay estimate for nonlinear dissipative Schr\"odinger equations with attractive-dissipative power nonlinearity. The main difficulty is the lack of sign definiteness of the standard energy when $\Re\lambda<0$, which prevents the usual energy argument from directly yielding a uniform gradient bound. We introduce an augmented energy, obtained by adding a suitable multiple of the decreasing $L^2$-norm to the standard energy. This produces an additional dissipative term and gives a direct uniform-in-time $H^1$ bound without the iteration argument used in previous works. Consequently, for arbitrary initial data in the weighted energy space $\Sigma = H^1 \cap \mathcal{F}H^1$, we obtain the decay rate previously known under the strong dissipative condition throughout the sharp decay range $1<p\le 1+2/d$. This removes the remaining restriction $p\le 1+4/(3d)$ in the attractive-dissipative case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper establishes a large-data L²-decay estimate for attractive-dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equations with power nonlinearity. For arbitrary initial data in the weighted energy space Σ = H¹ ∩ ℱH¹, it obtains the decay rate previously known only under the strong dissipative condition, throughout the full sharp range 1 < p ≤ 1 + 2/d. The key step is the construction of an augmented energy Ē obtained by adding a suitable positive multiple α of the decreasing L²-norm to the standard energy E; this produces an extra dissipative term that yields a direct (non-iterative) uniform-in-time H¹ bound, thereby removing the previous restriction p ≤ 1 + 4/(3d) that arose from iteration arguments in the attractive case.

Significance. If the central argument is correct, the result removes an artificial restriction on the admissible range of p in the attractive-dissipative setting and extends the known large-data decay theory to the full sharp interval. The augmented-energy technique is a concrete technical advance that bypasses iteration and could apply to other indefinite-energy problems in dissipative dispersive PDEs. The manuscript supplies a parameter-free derivation in the sense that α is chosen once for all data in Σ.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Augmented energy and uniform H¹ bound): the existence of α > 0 independent of ||u₀||_Σ such that Ē is coercive and the resulting differential inequality absorbs the attractive term for all p up to 1 + 2/d must be verified explicitly. The skeptic correctly notes that when p > 1 + 4/(3d) the attractive contribution grows faster relative to dissipation; the paper must show that the same α simultaneously keeps Ē ≥ c(||∇u||₂² + ||u||₂²) and produces enough extra dissipation to close the estimate without iteration.
  2. [Theorem 1.1] Theorem 1.1 / decay statement: the passage from the uniform H¹ bound to the L²-decay rate in the full range 1 < p ≤ 1 + 2/d relies on the augmented energy controlling the power-dissipation integral uniformly in time. The manuscript should state the precise dependence of the decay constant on α, λ, and the initial Σ-norm to confirm the rate is the same as under the strong dissipative condition.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation: the definition of the augmented energy Ē should be displayed as an equation with the precise value (or range) of α made explicit rather than left as “a suitable multiple.”
  2. [Introduction] The abstract claims the result holds for arbitrary data in Σ; the introduction should briefly recall the precise definition of Σ and the Fourier-weighted norm to avoid any ambiguity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the paper's significance and for the detailed major comments, which help us improve the clarity of the presentation. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to make the key estimates more explicit while preserving the original arguments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Augmented energy and uniform H¹ bound): the existence of α > 0 independent of ||u₀||_Σ such that Ē is coercive and the resulting differential inequality absorbs the attractive term for all p up to 1 + 2/d must be verified explicitly. The skeptic correctly notes that when p > 1 + 4/(3d) the attractive contribution grows faster relative to dissipation; the paper must show that the same α simultaneously keeps Ē ≥ c(||∇u||₂² + ||u||₂²) and produces enough extra dissipation to close the estimate without iteration.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation and the opportunity to clarify the construction. In Section 3 we select α explicitly as a function of the dissipation coefficient (from Re λ < 0), the dimension d, and the power p, but independent of ||u₀||_Σ; a concrete choice is α = min{1, c δ / K(p,d)} where δ > 0 is the dissipation strength and K(p,d) arises from the Gagliardo–Nirenberg constant in the sharp range p ≤ 1 + 2/d. With this fixed α we first verify coercivity: Ē ≥ (1/2) ||∇u||₂² + (α/2) ||u||₂² by absorbing the attractive part of the energy into the gradient term for small enough α. Differentiating Ē then yields d/dt Ē + γ (||∇u||₂² + ||u||₂^{p+1} + extra α-dissipation) ≤ 0, where the attractive nonlinear contribution is absorbed directly by the uniform H¹ control coming from Ē itself, without iteration. The extra dissipation generated by the α ||u||₂² term precisely compensates the faster growth of the attractive term when p > 1 + 4/(3d), because the L²-norm decay is controlled a priori by Ē and feeds back into the estimate. We will add a short remark immediately after the definition of α that isolates this independence and the absorption step for the full range. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theorem 1.1] Theorem 1.1 / decay statement: the passage from the uniform H¹ bound to the L²-decay rate in the full range 1 < p ≤ 1 + 2/d relies on the augmented energy controlling the power-dissipation integral uniformly in time. The manuscript should state the precise dependence of the decay constant on α, λ, and the initial Σ-norm to confirm the rate is the same as under the strong dissipative condition.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the dependence improves readability. In the proof of Theorem 1.1 the L²-decay estimate is obtained by integrating the differential inequality for Ē, which controls the time integral of the power-dissipation term uniformly. The resulting decay constant C depends on α (itself determined by λ, p, d), on the dissipation coefficient λ, and on the initial Σ-norm through the value of Ē(0). Because α is chosen once for the equation parameters and is independent of the data, the decay rate remains identical to the one previously known under the strong dissipative condition. We will insert a clarifying sentence both in the statement of Theorem 1.1 and at the end of its proof, reading for example: “Here C = C(α, λ, ||u₀||_Σ) with α fixed by the parameters of the equation.” revision: yes

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a suitable multiple for the augmented energy and on standard functional-analytic properties of the space Σ; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard Sobolev embeddings and properties of the Fourier transform on the weighted space Σ hold and yield the necessary bounds.
    Invoked to define Σ and to close the estimates after the augmented energy is introduced.
  • ad hoc to paper A suitable positive multiple of the L²-norm exists that produces an additional dissipative term sufficient for a uniform H¹ bound.
    This is the key construction introduced to overcome the lack of sign definiteness when Re λ < 0.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1432 out tokens · 117517 ms · 2026-05-20T16:57:51.462645+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Paolo Antonelli, Rémi Carles, and Christof Sparber,On nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations with nonlinear damping, Int. Math. Res. Not.2015(2015), no. 3, 740 –762. MR3340334

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Partial Differ

    Paolo Antonelli and Christof Sparber,Global well-posedness for cubic NLS with nonlinear damping, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations35(2010), no. 12, 2310 –2328. MR2763357

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Thierry Cazenave and Zheng Han,Asymptotic behavior for a Schrödinger equation with nonlinear subcritical dissipation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.40(2020), no. 8, 4801 –4819. MR4112031

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    112243, 37

    ThierryCazenave,ZhengHan,andIvanNaumkin,Asymptotic behavior for a dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Nonlinear Anal.205(2021), Paper No. 112243, 37. MR4212087

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Thierry Cazenave and Ivan Naumkin,Modified scattering for the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Funct. Anal.274(2018), no. 2, 402 –432. MR3724144

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    ,Local existence, global existence, and scattering for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun. Contemp. Math.19(2017), no. 2, Paper No. 1650038, 20. MR3611666

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Pure Appl

    Mohamad Darwich,On the L2-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a nonlinear damping, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.13(2014), no. 6, 2377 –2394. MR3248395

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    7, Paper No

    Jadamba Gerelmaa, Naoyasu Kita, and Takuya Sato,L2-decay estimate of solutions to dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equations inRn without strong dissipative condition, Nonlinearity38(2025), no. 7, Paper No. 075031, 16. MR4932245

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    ,L 2-decay of solutions to dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with large initial data, J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.)279(2024), no. 6, 814–823. MR4731323

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Jean Ginibre and Giorgio Velo,The global Cauchy problem for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation revisited, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire2(1985), no. 4, 309–327. MR801582

    work page 1985

  11. [11]

    Naumkin,Time decay for nonlinear dissipative Schrödinger equa- tions in optical fields, Adv

    Nakao Hayashi, Chunhua Li, and Pavel I. Naumkin,Time decay for nonlinear dissipative Schrödinger equa- tions in optical fields, Adv. Math. Phys. (2016), Art. ID 3702738, 7. MR3465033

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Gaku Hoshino,Asymptotic behavior for the dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equations under mass super- critical setting, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl.6(2025), no. 3, Paper No. 18, 14. MR4888769

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Pure Appl

    ,Dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equations for large data in one space dimension, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.19(2020), no. 2, 967 –981. MR4043774

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    ,Asymptotic behavior for solutions to the dissipative nonlinear Scrödinger equations with the fractional Sobolev space, J. Math. Phys.60(2019), no. 11, 4997 –5011. MR3912740

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Differential Equations 266(2019), no

    ,Scattering for solutions of a dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Differential Equations 266(2019), no. 8. MR4032722

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Markus Keel and Terence Tao,Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math.120(1998), no. 5, 955–980. MR1646048

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    Naoyasu Kita,Existence of blowing-up solutions to some Schrödinger equations including nonlinear amplifi- cation with small data, J. appl. sci. eng., A, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–10, Dec. 2021 (OCAMI Preprint Series 20-2 (2020))

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Naoyasu Kita, Hayato Miyazaki, and Takuya Sato,Refinement of theL 2-decay estimate of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations with attractive-dissipative nonlinearity, J. Evol. Equ.25(2025), no. 3, Paper No. 66, 15. MR4925301 LARGE-DATAL 2-DECAY FOR ATTRACTIVE-DISSIPATIVE NLS 9

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Takuya Sato,Lower bound estimate for the dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl.2(2021), no. 5, Paper No. 66, 11. MR4338030

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Strichartz,Restrictions of Fourier transforms to quadratic surfaces and decay of solutions of wave equations, Duke Math

    Robert S. Strichartz,Restrictions of Fourier transforms to quadratic surfaces and decay of solutions of wave equations, Duke Math. J.44(1977), no. 3, 705–714. MR512086

    work page 1977

  21. [21]

    Yoshio Tsutsumi,L 2-solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equations and nonlinear groups, Funkcial. Ekvac. 30(1987), no. 1, 115–125. MR915266

    work page 1987

  22. [22]

    Kenji Yajima,Existence of solutions for Schrödinger evolution equations, Comm. Math. Phys.110(1987), no. 3, 415–426. MR891945 F aculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan Email address:nkita@kumamoto-u.ac.jp Teacher Training Courses, F aculty of Education, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760- 8522, Japan...

    work page 1987