pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18290 · v1 · pith:ODB5EYPEnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 💻 cs.CE

Quantifying water-driven geometric uncertainties in powder bed concrete printing using high-resolution 3D modeling

Christoph Wolf , Petr Hlav\'a\v{c}ek , Annika Robens-Radermacher , Daniel Kadoke , J\"org F. Unger This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 23:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE
keywords powder bed 3D printingconcrete printinggeometric deviationswater dosagedesign compensationstereophotogrammetrydimensional accuracybinder distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Varying water dosage in powder bed concrete 3D printing creates systematic geometric deviations that designers can offset by pre-adjusting the digital model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the amount of water applied voxel by voxel during powder bed printing of concrete controls the accuracy of the final shape. Small increases in water produce noticeable swelling, edge rounding, and direction-dependent distortions that grow larger at higher dosages. High-resolution 3D scans aligned to the original CAD files allow precise measurement of these repeatable error patterns through distance and volume calculations. Mechanical tests show stiffness and strength stay nearly constant across the tested range because excess water spreads into the surrounding powder and leaves the effective mixing ratio unchanged. The authors then demonstrate that modifying the input geometry ahead of time can cancel out the expected distortions and deliver better final accuracy without any post-processing.

Core claim

Geometric fidelity in powder bed printed concrete depends strongly on voxel-wise water dosage, producing repeatable, directionally biased deviations such as edge rounding and swelling that intensify with higher water content. These effects were quantified by aligning high-resolution stereophotogrammetry scans with CAD models and computing point-wise distance errors plus volumetric differences across multiple dosage settings. Mechanical properties remain largely stable because excess voxel water diffuses outward, preserving the effective water-cement ratio. A design-compensation approach that pre-adjusts the digital geometry counters the predictable deviations and improves as-built accuracy.

What carries the argument

High-resolution stereophotogrammetry scans aligned to CAD models, used to compute point-wise distance errors and volumetric differences across water-dosage settings.

If this is right

  • Geometric deviations grow larger and more anisotropic as water dosage increases.
  • Stiffness and strength of the printed concrete remain nearly constant across the tested water-dosage range.
  • Pre-adjusting the input CAD geometry reduces final shape errors without post-processing.
  • Deviation patterns are repeatable and can be mapped for different water levels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pre-compensation method could be tested on more complex or larger geometries to check whether the error patterns remain predictable at scale.
  • If mechanical properties stay stable, water dosage might be varied deliberately to improve powder flow or curing speed while still meeting strength targets.
  • Similar diffusion-driven compensation logic may apply to other powder-bed binder-jetting processes that use liquid agents on granular materials.

Load-bearing premise

Excess water from each voxel diffuses into the surrounding powder and leaves the effective water-cement ratio inside the hardened material largely unchanged.

What would settle it

Direct chemical analysis of hardened printed samples showing that the water-cement ratio inside the material varies measurably with the applied voxel dosage would contradict the diffusion account for stable mechanical properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18290 by Annika Robens-Radermacher, Christoph Wolf, Daniel Kadoke, J\"org F. Unger, Petr Hlav\'a\v{c}ek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Typical printing results right after finishing the print. a) The undisturbed powder bed with the prisms enclosed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sample 3D scan of a prism with 30 ms nozzle time (downscaled to a resolution of 3 mm per triangle for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of scanned (blue) and reference (red) geometry before and after registration showing di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of the typical stress-strain relation in a 3-point-bending test and illustration of loading regions and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between different water contents, starting with a nozzle opening time of 11 ms, to 20 ms, up to 30 ms (consistent scaling across all prisms) With increasing water dosage, the printed shapes exhibit progressive deformation. At 11 ms, the specimen begins to show slight edge softening and minor surface irregularities. At 20 ms, rounding becomes more pronounced, and the cross-section starts to devia… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between CAD and as-printed geometry using the 20 ms nozzle time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Signed point-wise distance distribution between printed and CAD surfaces, grouped by face orientation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the theoretical, mass-based and ratio method for calculating the water-to-cement ratio over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Mean signed surface distance from CAD (solid lines) per face group ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Side view of a prism displaying typical deformation of the first layer due to low friction on the build plate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Boxplot of mean signed surface distance from CAD per face group ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Evaluated metrics over nozzle time. a) Hausdor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spatial distribution of mean signed distances and standard deviations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Material tests a) evolution of the stress-strain curves of all samples including a moving average, b) flexural [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Joint KDE of flexural strength vs. Young’s modulus including marginal distributions with individual samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Adapting the shape of the prism based on the signed distance data from the initial 30 ms print. The reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Comparison of signed distance distributions between the initial 30 ms nozzle time print and the compensated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dimensional accuracy in powder bed 3D printing of concrete is strongly influenced by binder distribution, and the resulting geometric deviations can be direction-dependent. This study examines how voxel-wise water dosage influences geometric fidelity and deviation anisotropy. Experiments show that small changes in water content can cause large, systematic deviations, including edge rounding and swelling. We quantify these effects using high-resolution stereophotogrammetry, aligning as-built scans with CAD models. We then compute deviation metrics such as point-wise distance errors and volumetric differences across multiple water-dosage settings, revealing repeatable, directionally biased deformation patterns that intensify with higher water content. Mechanical testing indicates that stiffness and strength change only marginally, with no clear trend in the tested range. This is explained by excess voxel water diffusing into surrounding powder, leaving the effective water-cement ratio largely unchanged. Finally, we demonstrate a design-compensation concept that pre-adjusts digital geometry to counter predictable deviations, improving accuracy without post-processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the influence of voxel-wise water dosage on geometric fidelity in powder bed concrete 3D printing. Using high-resolution stereophotogrammetry to align as-built scans with CAD models, the authors quantify directionally biased deviations (edge rounding, swelling) that increase with water content. Mechanical tests show marginal changes in stiffness and strength with no clear trend, which the authors attribute to excess water diffusing into surrounding powder and preserving the effective water-cement ratio. They conclude by demonstrating a pre-adjustment compensation strategy on the digital geometry to mitigate predictable deviations without post-processing.

Significance. If the geometric deviation patterns and compensation approach are robustly validated, the work offers a practical route to improve dimensional accuracy in powder-bed concrete printing while maintaining mechanical performance. The combination of high-resolution metrology with a design-compensation workflow addresses a load-bearing process uncertainty in construction-scale additive manufacturing and could support more reliable digital-to-physical translation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results section on mechanical testing] The mechanical-stability claim rests on the diffusion explanation (excess voxel water diffusing into surrounding powder to keep the local w/c ratio unchanged). This is inferred solely from the lack of a clear trend in bulk stiffness and strength data; no direct measurements (e.g., local compositional mapping, hydration-product analysis, or porosity distribution) are presented to confirm uniform effective w/c ratios across dosage levels. Alternative mechanisms such as binder migration or altered pore-size distribution remain possible and would still permit geometric control while affecting long-term performance in ways not captured by the reported bulk tests.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental methods] Sample sizes, number of replicates, and statistical details (error bars, p-values, or confidence intervals) for the deviation metrics and mechanical tests are not stated in the provided sections; these should be added to allow assessment of repeatability.
  2. [Design-compensation subsection] The compensation concept is demonstrated but the exact pre-adjustment algorithm, the magnitude of the geometric offsets applied, and the resulting improvement in quantitative metrics (e.g., RMS deviation reduction) are only qualitatively described; a table or figure quantifying before/after accuracy would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to the text.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section on mechanical testing] The mechanical-stability claim rests on the diffusion explanation (excess voxel water diffusing into surrounding powder to keep the local w/c ratio unchanged). This is inferred solely from the lack of a clear trend in bulk stiffness and strength data; no direct measurements (e.g., local compositional mapping, hydration-product analysis, or porosity distribution) are presented to confirm uniform effective w/c ratios across dosage levels. Alternative mechanisms such as binder migration or altered pore-size distribution remain possible and would still permit geometric control while affecting long-term performance in ways not captured by the reported bulk tests.

    Authors: We agree that the proposed diffusion mechanism is an inference drawn from the observed lack of a clear trend in the bulk mechanical data rather than from direct local measurements. No compositional mapping, hydration analysis, or porosity characterization was performed. In the revised manuscript we will rephrase the relevant paragraph to present the diffusion explanation as a plausible hypothesis consistent with the powder-bed process and the mechanical results, while explicitly noting that alternative mechanisms (binder migration, altered pore-size distribution) cannot be excluded and could influence long-term durability. We will also add a short discussion of these limitations and their implications. The primary contribution of the work remains the quantification of geometric deviations and the compensation strategy; the mechanical tests were included only to show that short-term stiffness and strength are not strongly degraded within the tested dosage range. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; experimental claims rest on direct measurements

full rationale

The manuscript reports experimental quantification of geometric deviations via stereophotogrammetry and mechanical testing across water-dosage levels. The diffusion-based explanation for marginal changes in stiffness/strength is presented as an inference from the absence of a clear trend in the test data, not as a derived prediction obtained from any equation or fitted parameter within the paper. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described content. The design-compensation demonstration is likewise an empirical adjustment shown to improve accuracy, without reduction to prior inputs by construction. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is experimental and observational. It relies on standard assumptions about measurement accuracy in 3D scanning and material diffusion behavior in concrete but introduces no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond typical domain practices.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption High-resolution stereophotogrammetry provides sufficiently accurate 3D models for reliable comparison against CAD geometry to quantify deviations.
    Invoked to support the quantification of geometric fidelity and deviation metrics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1407 out tokens · 61553 ms · 2026-05-19T23:36:12.516679+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    De Schutter, K

    G. De Schutter, K. Lesage, V . Mechtcherine, V . N. Nerella, G. Habert, I. Agusti-Juan, Vision of 3d printing with concrete — technical, economic and environmental potentials, Cement and Concrete Research 112 (2018) 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001 2018

  2. [2]

    Buswell, R

    R. Buswell, R. Soar, A. Gibb, A. Thorpe, Freeform construction: Mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction, Automation in Construction 16 (2) (2007) 224–231.doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2006.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2006.05.002 2007

  3. [3]

    S. Lim, R. Buswell, T. Le, S. Austin, A. Gibb, T. Thorpe, Developments in construction-scale additive manufactur- ing processes, Automation in Construction 21 (2012) 262–268.doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 2012

  4. [4]

    Zhuang, F

    Z. Zhuang, F. Xu, J. Ye, N. Hu, L. Jiang, Y . Weng, A comprehensive review of sustainable materials and toolpath optimization in 3d concrete printing, npj Materials Sustainability 2 (1) (Jun. 2024).doi:10.1038/ s44296-024-00017-9

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Buswell, W

    R. Buswell, W. Leal de Silva, S. Jones, J. Dirrenberger, 3d printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research, Cement and Concrete Research 112 (2018) 37–49.doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006 2018

  6. [7]

    Khoshnevis, R

    B. Khoshnevis, R. Russell, H. Kwon, S. Bukkapatnam, Crafting large prototypes, IEEE Robotics &; Automation Magazine 8 (3) (2001) 33–42.doi:10.1109/100.956812

    work page doi:10.1109/100.956812 2001

  7. [8]

    B. Khoshnevis, Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies, Au- tomation in Construction 13 (1) (2004) 5–19.doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 2004

  8. [9]

    Weger, C

    D. Weger, C. Gehlen, W. Korte, F. Meyer-Br ¨otz, J. Scheydt, T. Stengel, Building rethought – 3d concrete printing in building practice, Construction Robotics 5 (3–4) (2021) 203–210.doi:10.1007/s41693-022-00064-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s41693-022-00064-5 2021

  9. [10]

    Shakor, S

    P. Shakor, S. Nejadi, G. Paul, S. Malek, Review of emerging additive manufacturing technologies in 3d printing of cementitious materials in the construction industry, Frontiers in Built Environment 4 (Jan. 2019).doi:10.3389/ fbuil.2018.00085

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [11]

    T. T. Le, S. A. Austin, S. Lim, R. A. Buswell, A. G. F. Gibb, T. Thorpe, Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete, Materials and Structures 45 (8) (2012) 1221–1232.doi:10.1617/ s11527-012-9828-z

    work page 2012

  11. [12]

    Roussel, J

    N. Roussel, J. Spangenberg, J. Wallevik, R. Wolfs, Numerical simulations of concrete processing: From standard formative casting to additive manufacturing, Cement and Concrete Research 135 (2020) 106075.doi:10.1016/ j.cemconres.2020.106075

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [13]

    S. A. Nair, S. Panda, M. Santhanam, G. Sant, N. Neithalath, A critical examination of the influence of material characteristics and extruder geometry on 3d printing of cementitious binders, Cement and Concrete Composites 112 (2020) 103671.doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103671

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103671 2020

  13. [14]

    Ketel, G

    S. Ketel, G. Falzone, B. Wang, N. Washburn, G. Sant, A printability index for linking slurry rheology to the geometrical attributes of 3d-printed components, Cement and Concrete Composites 101 (2019) 32–43.doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.022 2019

  14. [15]

    Masset, R

    D. Lowke, E. Dini, A. Perrot, D. Weger, C. Gehlen, B. Dillenburger, Particle-bed 3d printing in concrete con- struction – possibilities and challenges, Cement and Concrete Research 112 (2018) 50–65.doi:10.1016/j. cemconres.2018.05.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2018

  15. [16]

    Lowke, D

    D. Lowke, D. Talke, I. Dressler, D. Weger, C. Gehlen, C. Ostertag, R. Rael, Particle bed 3d printing by selective cement activation – applications, material and process technology, Cement and Concrete Research 134 (2020) 106077.doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106077

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106077 2020

  16. [17]

    Diener, A

    S. Diener, A. Zocca, J. G ¨unster, Literature review: Methods for achieving high powder bed densities in ceramic powder bed based additive manufacturing, Open Ceramics 8 (2021) 100191.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.oceram.2021.100191. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539521001371

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [18]

    Shakor, S

    P. Shakor, S. H. Chu, A. Puzatova, E. Dini, Review of binder jetting 3d printing in the construction industry, Progress in Additive Manufacturing 7 (4) (2022) 643–669.doi:10.1007/s40964-021-00252-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s40964-021-00252-9 2022

  18. [19]

    Salari, P

    F. Salari, P. Bosetti, V . M. Sglavo, Effect of printing strategies on the properties of product in selective sorel cement activation, Rapid Prototyping Journal 29 (11) (2023) 82–97.doi:10.1108/rpj-07-2022-0247

    work page doi:10.1108/rpj-07-2022-0247 2023

  19. [20]

    Salari, P

    F. Salari, P. Bosetti, V . M. Sglavo, Binder jetting 3d printing of magnesium oxychloride cement-based materials: Parametric analysis of manufacturing factors, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 6 (4) (2022) 86. doi:10.3390/jmmp6040086

    work page doi:10.3390/jmmp6040086 2022

  20. [21]

    I. Mai, D. Lowke, A. Perrot, Fluid intrusion in powder beds for selective cement activation – an experimental and analytical study, Cement and Concrete Research 156 (2022) 106771.doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022. 106771

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022 2022

  21. [22]

    Robens-Radermacher, C

    A. Robens-Radermacher, C. Kujath, F. Bos, V . Mechtcherine, J. F. Unger, Mechanical properties of 3d printed 32 concrete: a rilem tc 304-adc interlaboratory study-design and implementation of a database system for query- ing, sharing, and analyzing experimental data, Materials and Structures 58 (5) (Jun. 2025).doi:10.1617/ s11527-025-02650-9

    work page 2025

  22. [23]

    Mechtcherine, S

    V . Mechtcherine, S. Muthukrishnan, A. Robens-Radermacher, R. Wolfs, J. Versteege, C. Menna, O. Ozturk, N. Ozyurt, J. Roupec, C. Richter, J. Jungwirth, L. Miranda, R. Ammann, J.-F. Caron, V . de Bono, R. Monte, I. Navarrete, C. Eugenin, H. Lombois-Burger, B. Baz, M. Sinka, A. Sapata, I. Harbouz, Y . Zhang, Z. Jia, J. Kruger, J.-P. Mostert, M.ˇStefanˇciˇc,...

    work page doi:10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9 2025

  23. [24]

    F. Bos, C. Menna, A. Robens-Radermacher, R. Wolfs, N. Roussel, H. Lombois-Burger, B. Baz, D. Weger, B. Ne- matollahi, M. Santhanam, Y . Zhang, S. Bhattacherjee, Z. Jia, Y . Chen, V . Mechtcherine, Mechanical properties of 3d printed concrete: a rilem tc 304-adc interlaboratory study — approach and main results, Materials and Structures 58 (5) (Jun. 2025)....

    work page doi:10.1617/s11527-025-02686-x 2025

  24. [25]

    Brunner, T

    K. Brunner, T. Stengel, A. Kustermann, 3D Particle Bed Printing Using Different Cementitious Binders and Recy- cled Sand, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 398–405.doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80724-4_49

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80724-4_49 2024

  25. [26]

    Lowke, I

    D. Lowke, I. Mai, E. Keita, A. Perrot, D. Weger, C. Gehlen, F. Herding, W. Zuo, N. Roussel, Material-process interactions in particle bed 3d printing and the underlying physics, Cement and Concrete Research 156 (2022) 106748.doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106748

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106748 2022

  26. [27]

    X. Wang, C. Naito, J. T. Fox, P. Bocchini, Impact of mix proportions on particle bed 3d printed concrete properties, Construction and Building Materials 419 (2024) 135441.doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135441

    work page doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135441 2024

  27. [28]

    Shahid, V

    M. Shahid, V . M. Sglavo, Binder jetting 3d printing of binary cement—siliceous sand mixture, Materials 17 (7) (2024) 1514.doi:10.3390/ma17071514

    work page doi:10.3390/ma17071514 2024

  28. [29]

    J. Xu, R. A. Buswell, P. Kinnell, I. Biro, J. Hodgson, N. Konstantinidis, L. Ding, Inspecting manufacturing precision of 3d printed concrete parts based on geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, Automation in Construction 117 (2020) 103233.doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103233

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103233 2020

  29. [30]

    Buswell, J

    R. Buswell, J. Xu, D. De Becker, J. Dobrzanski, J. Provis, J. T. Kolawole, P. Kinnell, Geometric quality assurance for 3d concrete printing and hybrid construction manufacturing using a standardised test part for benchmarking capability, Cement and Concrete Research 156 (2022) 106773.doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106773

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106773 2022

  30. [31]

    Shakor, S

    P. Shakor, S. Nejadi, G. Paul, J. Sanjayan, Dimensional accuracy, flowability, wettability, and porosity in inkjet 3dp for gypsum and cement mortar materials, Automation in Construction 110 (2020) 102964.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102964

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102964 2020

  31. [32]

    S. A. Nair, G. Sant, N. Neithalath, Mathematical morphology-based point cloud analysis techniques for geometry assessment of 3d printed concrete elements, Additive Manufacturing 49 (2022) 102499.doi:10.1016/j.addma. 2021.102499

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma 2022

  32. [33]

    Rizzieri, L

    G. Rizzieri, L. Ferrara, M. Cremonesi, Numerical simulation of the extrusion and layer deposition processes in 3d concrete printing with the particle finite element method, Computational Mechanics 73 (2) (2023) 277–295. doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02367-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02367-y 2023

  33. [34]

    Rizzieri, F

    G. Rizzieri, F. Lanteri, L. Ferrara, M. Cremonesi, Shapegen3dcp: A deep learning framework for layer shape prediction in 3d concrete printing (2025).doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2510.02009

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02009 2025

  34. [35]

    Ashrafi, S

    N. Ashrafi, S. Nazarian, N. A. Meisel, J. P. Duarte, Experimental calibration and compensation for the continuous effect of time, number of layers and volume of material on shape deformation in small-scale additive manufacturing of concrete, Additive Manufacturing 47 (2021) 102228.doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102228

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102228 2021

  35. [36]

    Ashrafi, S

    N. Ashrafi, S. Nazarian, N. Meisel, J. P. Duarte, A grammar-based algorithm for toolpath generation: Compensating for material deformation in the additive manufacturing of concrete, Additive Manufacturing 55 (2022) 102803. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102803

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102803 2022

  36. [37]

    A. K. Tiwari, P. P. Pratapa, M. Santhanam, Lattice concrete: 3d printed periodic cellular structures through selective cement hydration, Journal of Building Engineering 86 (2024) 108946.doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108946

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108946 2024

  37. [38]

    Herding, D

    F. Herding, D. Lowke, Improving the Dimensional Accuracy in Selective Cement Activation by w/c-Ratio Grada- tion, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 370–377.doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_43

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_43 2024

  38. [39]

    Shahid, V

    M. Shahid, V . M. Sglavo, Effect of water-to-quick setting cement ratio and aggregate size on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of binder jetting 3d-printed bodies, Open Ceramics 20 (2024) 100704.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100704

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100704 2024

  39. [40]

    Herding, I

    F. Herding, I. Mai, D. Lowke, Reduction of the cement content in selective cement activation, ce/papers 6 (6) (2023) 790–796.doi:10.1002/cepa.2826

    work page doi:10.1002/cepa.2826 2023

  40. [41]

    Glotz, Y

    T. Glotz, Y . Petryna, Experimental characterization of anisotropic mechanical behaviour and failure mechanisms of hardened printed concrete, Materials 17 (16) (2024) 3931.doi:10.3390/ma17163931

    work page doi:10.3390/ma17163931 2024

  41. [42]

    Keller, R

    P. Keller, R. Mendˇrick´y, Analysis of object deformations printed by additive manufacturing from concrete mixtures 33 over time, Applied Sciences 15 (17) (2025) 9749.doi:10.3390/app15179749

    work page doi:10.3390/app15179749 2025

  42. [43]

    Salari, A

    F. Salari, A. Zocca, P. Bosetti, P. Hlav ´aˇcek, A. Italiano, F. Gobbin, P. Colombo, H.-C. K ¨uhne, V . M. Sglavo, Powder-bed 3d printing by selective activation of magnesium phosphate cement: Determining significant pro- cessing parameters and their effect on mechanical strength, Open Ceramics 18 (2024) 100609.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100609

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100609 2024

  43. [44]

    Methods of testing cement – part 1: Determination of strength, Standard DIN EN 196-1, Deutsches Institut f ¨ur Normung (DIN), Berlin, Germany (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    Jadayel, F

    M. Jadayel, F. Khameneifar, Increasing 3d printing accuracy through convolutional neural network-based compen- sation for geometric deviations, Machines 13 (5) (2025) 382.doi:10.3390/machines13050382. 34

    work page doi:10.3390/machines13050382 2025