pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19162 · v1 · pith:R23EXENXnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Electronic and Magnonic Properties of g-Wave Altermagnetism in Intercalated Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismg-wavetransition metal dichalcogenidesspin splittingmagnon dispersionhopping anisotropysingle-ion anisotropyintercalated compounds
0
0 comments X

The pith

In intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides, g-wave altermagnetism features material-dependent nodal structures from bond-dependent hopping anisotropy in electrons and single-ion anisotropy in magnons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines Fe1/4NbS2 and V1/3NbS2 as altermagnetic candidates using tight-binding models for electrons and spin models for magnons, backed by first-principles calculations. It establishes that the g-wave electronic spin splitting stems from bond-dependent hopping anisotropy, which produces different nodal patterns depending on the material. For magnons, chiral splitting arises from single-ion anisotropy and shows up as nodal structures only when spins align along an easy axis, vanishing in the easy plane. These features persist under 1/S corrections from magnon interactions, though the splitting size gets reduced, especially with strong antiferromagnetic exchange. Understanding this helps reveal how crystal symmetry influences spin splitting without net magnetization in altermagnets.

Core claim

The g-wave electronic spin splitting originates from bond-dependent hopping anisotropy, leading to material-dependent nodal structures. For the magnetic excitations, the emergence of chiral splitting in the magnon dispersion is controlled by single-ion anisotropy, which manifests as altermagnetic-like nodal structures when spins are oriented along an easy-axis but disappears when the spins are aligned in an easy-plane. The 1/S corrections from magnon-magnon interactions preserve the symmetry and nodal structure of the band splitting while generally reducing its magnitude, with strong antiferromagnetic exchange leading to a non-negligible renormalization of the chiral splitting.

What carries the argument

Bond-dependent hopping anisotropy in the effective tight-binding model for electrons and single-ion anisotropy in the spin model for magnons.

If this is right

  • The nodal structures in the electronic band structure vary between different intercalated compounds due to their specific hopping anisotropies.
  • Chiral magnon splitting appears only for easy-axis spin orientations and is absent in easy-plane configurations.
  • The altermagnetic nodal features in magnon spectra remain intact beyond linear spin-wave theory but decrease in size due to interactions.
  • Strong antiferromagnetic exchange causes significant renormalization of the magnon chiral splitting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If these models hold, varying the intercalant or transition metal could tune the nodal structures for different applications.
  • The survival of the splitting under 1/S corrections suggests robustness that might enable room-temperature effects in related materials.
  • Connections to other altermagnets could be explored by comparing the anisotropy mechanisms across different crystal symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The effective tight-binding and spin models, with parameters from first-principles calculations, accurately capture the main hopping anisotropy and single-ion anisotropy that set the nodal structures.

What would settle it

Direct measurement via ARPES of the predicted material-specific nodal points in the electronic spin-split bands or via inelastic neutron scattering of the magnon chiral splitting and its dependence on spin orientation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19162 by Adrian Bahri, Chunjing Jia, Shuyi Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: b corresponds to a direction where the bands are de￾generate. Including the 1/S correction leads to a quanti￾tative renormalization of the dispersion while preserving these key features, with the splitting in Fig. 4a remain￾ing clearly visible and the degeneracy in Fig. 4b main￾tained. This indicates that the 1/S correction primarily modifies the energy scale without altering the symmetry￾determined struct… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnetism is a recently identified class of magnetic order characterized by unconventional momentum-dependent spin splitting in the absence of net magnetization, and understanding its electronic and magnetic properties is essential for revealing its fundamental physics and potential applications. In this work we investigate two intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides, Fe$_{1/4}$NbS$_2$ and V$_{1/3}$NbS$_2$, as candidate altermagnetic materials by using effective tight-binding and spin models complemented by first-principles calculations. We show that the $g$-wave electronic spin splitting originates from bond-dependent hopping anisotropy, leading to material-dependent nodal structures. For the magnetic excitations, the emergence of chiral splitting in the magnon dispersion is controlled by single-ion anisotropy, which manifests as altermagnetic-like nodal structures when spins are oriented along an easy-axis. Conversely, this altermagnetic signature disappears when the spins are aligned in an easy-plane. Beyond linear spin-wave theory, we find that $1/S$ corrections from magnon--magnon interactions preserve the symmetry and nodal structure of the band splitting while generally reducing its magnitude, with strong antiferromagnetic exchange leading to a non-negligible renormalization of the chiral splitting. Our findings establish intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides as promising platforms for understanding the interplay between crystal symmetry, non-relativistic spin splitting, and magnetic properties in altermagnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies g-wave altermagnetism in the intercalated TMDs Fe_{1/4}NbS_2 and V_{1/3}NbS_2. Using effective tight-binding models, spin-wave theory, and first-principles calculations, it shows that the electronic g-wave spin splitting originates from bond-dependent hopping anisotropy and produces material-dependent nodal structures. For magnons, chiral splitting is controlled by single-ion anisotropy, yielding altermagnetic-like nodes for easy-axis orientation that disappear for easy-plane alignment. The 1/S corrections from magnon-magnon interactions are found to preserve the nodal symmetry while renormalizing the splitting magnitude, with strong antiferromagnetic exchange producing non-negligible effects.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies concrete material realizations of g-wave altermagnetism and demonstrates the interplay between crystal symmetry, non-relativistic spin splitting, and magnon excitations. The explicit treatment of 1/S corrections that preserve nodal features while allowing renormalization constitutes a clear technical strength, as does the use of DFT-informed parameters to connect model predictions to specific compounds. These results position intercalated TMDs as accessible platforms for exploring altermagnetic physics and potential spintronic applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [Magnon results section (likely §4)] The statement that 1/S corrections preserve the nodal symmetry of the magnon chiral splitting (abstract and corresponding results section) is load-bearing for the claim that the altermagnetic signature survives quantum corrections. An explicit expansion of the corrected dispersion to first order in 1/S, showing that the single-ion anisotropy term retains its symmetry properties without generating new nodal shifts, would strengthen this point.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Electronic properties section] The abstract refers to 'material-dependent nodal structures' for the electronic splitting; a side-by-side comparison of the nodal locations or wave-vector coordinates for Fe_{1/4}NbS_2 versus V_{1/3}NbS_2 in the main text or a dedicated figure would make this dependence more transparent.
  2. [Model construction subsection] Clarify the precise definition of the bond-dependent hopping amplitudes in the tight-binding Hamiltonian and whether they are obtained directly from DFT projections or via a subsequent fitting procedure.
  3. [Beyond linear spin-wave theory paragraph] The renormalization of the chiral splitting under strong antiferromagnetic exchange is described qualitatively; providing the numerical factor or scaling relation obtained from the 1/S calculation would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive suggestion. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Magnon results section (likely §4)] The statement that 1/S corrections preserve the nodal symmetry of the magnon chiral splitting (abstract and corresponding results section) is load-bearing for the claim that the altermagnetic signature survives quantum corrections. An explicit expansion of the corrected dispersion to first order in 1/S, showing that the single-ion anisotropy term retains its symmetry properties without generating new nodal shifts, would strengthen this point.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit expansion clarifies the robustness of the nodal structure. The 1/S corrections arise from the quartic terms in the Holstein-Primakoff expansion of the spin Hamiltonian. These interaction terms are invariant under the same space-group operations that enforce the g-wave symmetry of the single-ion anisotropy contribution. Consequently, the functional form of the chiral splitting (including node locations) is unchanged at order 1/S; only its overall magnitude is renormalized. In the revised manuscript we will add this first-order expansion explicitly in the magnon results section, confirming that no symmetry-breaking shifts appear. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Moderate DFT parameter dependence but derivation of nodal structures remains independent

full rationale

The paper derives the g-wave electronic spin splitting from bond-dependent hopping anisotropy and magnon chiral splitting from single-ion anisotropy using effective tight-binding and spin models whose parameters are informed by first-principles calculations on the target compounds. These models are constructed to capture the relevant anisotropies, and the nodal structures plus 1/S corrections are obtained by direct analysis of the model Hamiltonians rather than by fitting or redefinition of inputs. No equation or step reduces a claimed prediction to a tautology or self-citation chain; the first-principles input supplies numerical values while the symmetry and origin statements follow from the model structure itself. This yields a low but non-zero circularity score reflecting parameter sourcing without collapsing the central claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard condensed-matter modeling assumptions plus material-specific parameters extracted from DFT; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • bond-dependent hopping amplitudes
    Anisotropic hopping terms are chosen or fitted to reproduce the crystal symmetry and to generate the reported g-wave splitting.
  • single-ion anisotropy strength
    The magnitude of the anisotropy term is adjusted to control the appearance or disappearance of chiral magnon splitting.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The effective tight-binding Hamiltonian derived from DFT accurately represents the low-energy electronic structure near the Fermi level.
    Invoked when mapping first-principles results onto the model used for spin-splitting calculations.
  • domain assumption Linear spin-wave theory plus 1/S corrections suffice to capture the leading magnon dispersion and interaction effects.
    Used to analyze magnon chiral splitting and its renormalization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1565 out tokens · 43518 ms · 2026-05-20T07:25:10.458432+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal ro- tation symmetry.Physical Review X, 12(3):031042, 2022

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth. Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal ro- tation symmetry.Physical Review X, 12(3):031042, 2022

  2. [2]

    Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism.Phys- ical Review X, 12(4):040501, 2022

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth. Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism.Phys- ical Review X, 12(4):040501, 2022

  3. [3]

    Anomalous hall anti- ferromagnets.Nature Reviews Materials, 7(6):482–496, 2022

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Allan H MacDonald, Jairo Sinova, Satoru Nakatsuji, and Tomas Jungwirth. Anomalous hall anti- ferromagnets.Nature Reviews Materials, 7(6):482–496, 2022

  4. [4]

    Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current.Nature communications, 12(1):2846, 2021

    Hai-Yang Ma, Mengli Hu, Nana Li, Jianpeng Liu, Wang Yao, Jin-Feng Jia, and Junwei Liu. Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current.Nature communications, 12(1):2846, 2021

  5. [5]

    Satoru Hayami, Yuki Yanagi, and Hiroaki Kusunose. Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multi- poles.Physical Review B, 102(14):144441, 2020

  6. [6]

    Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antifer- romagnetic ordering.journal of the physical society of japan, 88(12):123702, 2019

    Satoru Hayami, Yuki Yanagi, and Hiroaki Kusunose. Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antifer- romagnetic ordering.journal of the physical society of japan, 88(12):123702, 2019

  7. [7]

    Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism.Phys

    Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Libor ˇSmejkal, Karel V´ yborn´ y, Yuta Yahagi, Jairo Sinova, Tom´ a ˇ s Jungwirth, and Jakub ˇZelezn´ y. Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism.Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:127701, Mar 2021

  8. [8]

    Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets

    Lin-Ding Yuan, Zhi Wang, Jun-Wei Luo, Emmanuel I Rashba, and Alex Zunger. Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets. Physical Review B, 102(1):014422, 2020

  9. [9]

    Lin-Ding Yuan, Zhi Wang, Jun-Wei Luo, and Alex Zunger. Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum- dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling.Physical Review Materials, 5(1):014409, 2021

  10. [10]

    Anisotropy of the anomalous hall effect in thin films of the altermagnet candidate mn 5 si 3.Physical Review B, 109(22):224430, 2024

    Miina Leivisk¨ a, Javier Rial, Anton´ ın Bad’ura, Rafael Lopes Seeger, Isma¨ ıla Kounta, Sebastian Beckert, Dominik Kriegner, Isabelle Joumard, Eva Schmoranzerov´ a, Jairo Sinova, et al. Anisotropy of the anomalous hall effect in thin films of the altermagnet candidate mn 5 si 3.Physical Review B, 109(22):224430, 2024

  11. [11]

    Altermag- netic anomalous hall effect emerging from electronic cor- relations.Physical Review Letters, 133(8):086503, 2024

    Toshihiro Sato, Sonia Haddad, Ion Cosma Fulga, Fakher F Assaad, and Jeroen van den Brink. Altermag- netic anomalous hall effect emerging from electronic cor- relations.Physical Review Letters, 133(8):086503, 2024

  12. [12]

    In- trinsic anomalous hall effect in altermagnets.Physical Review B, 110(9):094425, 2024

    Lotan Attias, Alex Levchenko, and Maxim Khodas. In- trinsic anomalous hall effect in altermagnets.Physical Review B, 110(9):094425, 2024

  13. [13]

    Separation of inverse altermag- netic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin hall effect in ruo 2.Physical Review Letters, 133(5):056701, 2024

    Ching-Te Liao, Yu-Chun Wang, Yu-Cheng Tien, Ssu-Yen Huang, and Danru Qu. Separation of inverse altermag- netic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin hall effect in ruo 2.Physical Review Letters, 133(5):056701, 2024

  14. [14]

    Anomalous hall effect in two-dimensional vanadium tetrahalogen with altermagnetic phase.Physical Review B, 110(15):155125, 2024

    Hao Jin, Zhibin Tan, Zhirui Gong, and Jian Wang. Anomalous hall effect in two-dimensional vanadium tetrahalogen with altermagnetic phase.Physical Review B, 110(15):155125, 2024

  15. [15]

    Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets.Physical Review Letters, 133(10):106701, 2024

    Yuan Fang, Jennifer Cano, and Sayed Ali Akbar Gho- rashi. Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets.Physical Review Letters, 133(10):106701, 2024

  16. [16]

    Tun- able band topology and optical conductivity in altermag- nets.Physical Review B, 110(2):024425, 2024

    Peng Rao, Alexander Mook, and Johannes Knolle. Tun- able band topology and optical conductivity in altermag- nets.Physical Review B, 110(2):024425, 2024

  17. [17]

    Topological responses from gapped weyl points in 2d altermagnets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09520, 2024

    Kirill Parshukov, Raymond Wiedmann, and Andreas P Schnyder. Topological responses from gapped weyl points in 2d altermagnets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09520, 2024

  18. [18]

    Bipolarized weyl semimetals and quantum crystal valley hall effect in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16603, 2024

    Chao-Yang Tan, Ze-Feng Gao, Huan-Cheng Yang, Kai Liu, Peng-Jie Guo, and Zhong-Yi Lu. Bipolarized weyl semimetals and quantum crystal valley hall effect in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16603, 2024

  19. [19]

    Fulde- ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov state induced by antiferromag- netic order inκ-type organic conductors.Physical Review Research, 5(4):043171, 2023

    Shuntaro Sumita, Makoto Naka, and Hitoshi Seo. Fulde- ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov state induced by antiferromag- netic order inκ-type organic conductors.Physical Review Research, 5(4):043171, 2023

  20. [20]

    Topological superconductivity in two- dimensional altermagnetic metals.Physical Review B, 108(18):184505, 2023

    Di Zhu, Zheng-Yang Zhuang, Zhigang Wu, and Zhongbo Yan. Topological superconductivity in two- dimensional altermagnetic metals.Physical Review B, 108(18):184505, 2023

  21. [21]

    Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model.Physical Review B, 108(22):224421, 2023

    Bjørnulf Brekke, Arne Brataas, and Asle Sudbø. Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model.Physical Review B, 108(22):224421, 2023

  22. [22]

    Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets

    Song-Bo Zhang, Lun-Hui Hu, and Titus Neupert. Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets. Nature Communications, 15(1):1801, 2024

  23. [23]

    Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced super- conductivity in altermagnets.Physical Review B, 110(6):L060508, 2024

    Debmalya Chakraborty and Annica M Black-Schaffer. Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced super- conductivity in altermagnets.Physical Review B, 110(6):L060508, 2024

  24. [24]

    Gapless superconducting state and mirage gap in altermagnets.Physical Review B, 109(20):L201404, 2024

    Miaomiao Wei, Longjun Xiang, Fuming Xu, Lei Zhang, Gaomin Tang, and Jian Wang. Gapless superconducting state and mirage gap in altermagnets.Physical Review B, 109(20):L201404, 2024

  25. [25]

    Many-body effects on superconductivity mediated by double-magnon processes in altermagnets.Physical Re- view B, 109(13):134515, 2024

    Kristian Mæland, Bjørnulf Brekke, and Asle Sudbø. Many-body effects on superconductivity mediated by double-magnon processes in altermagnets.Physical Re- view B, 109(13):134515, 2024

  26. [26]

    Thermodynamic proper- ties of a superconductor interfaced with an altermagnet

    Simran Chourasia, Aleksandr Svetogorov, Akashdeep Kamra, and Wolfgang Belzig. Thermodynamic proper- ties of a superconductor interfaced with an altermagnet. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10456, 2024

  27. [27]

    Altermagnetism: Ex- ploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics.Ad- vanced Functional Materials, page 2409327, 2024

    Ling Bai, Wanxiang Feng, Siyuan Liu, Libor ˇSmejkal, Yuriy Mokrousov, and Yugui Yao. Altermagnetism: Ex- ploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics.Ad- vanced Functional Materials, page 2409327, 2024

  28. [28]

    Gi- ant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin- momentum coupling.Physical Review X, 12(1):011028, 2022

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Anna Birk Hellenes, Rafael Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth. Gi- ant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin- momentum coupling.Physical Review X, 12(1):011028, 2022

  29. [29]

    Chiral magnons in altermag- 11 netic ruo 2.Physical Review Letters, 131(25):256703, 2023

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Alberto Marmodoro, Kyo-Hoon Ahn, Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Ilja Turek, Sergiy Mankovsky, Hubert Ebert, Sunil W D’Souza, Ondˇ rej ˇSipr, Jairo Sinova, et al. Chiral magnons in altermag- 11 netic ruo 2.Physical Review Letters, 131(25):256703, 2023

  30. [30]

    Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic mnte.Physical Review Letters, 133(15):156702, 2024

    Zheyuan Liu, Makoto Ozeki, Shinichiro Asai, Shinichi Itoh, and Takatsugu Masuda. Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic mnte.Physical Review Letters, 133(15):156702, 2024

  31. [31]

    Ob- serving altermagnetism using polarized neutrons.Physi- cal Review B, 111(6):L060405, 2025

    Paul A Mcclarty, Arsen Gukasov, and Jeffrey G Rau. Ob- serving altermagnetism using polarized neutrons.Physi- cal Review B, 111(6):L060405, 2025

  32. [32]

    Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematite α-fe 2 o 3.Physical Review B, 112(6):064425, 2025

    Rhea Hoyer, P Peter Stavropoulos, Aleksandar Razpopov, Roser Valent´ ı, LiborˇSmejkal, and Alexander Mook. Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematite α-fe 2 o 3.Physical Review B, 112(6):064425, 2025

  33. [33]

    Chiral magnetic ex- citations and domain textures of g-wave altermagnets

    Volodymyr P Kravchuk, Kostiantyn V Yershov, Jorge I Facio, Yaqian Guo, Oleg Janson, Olena Gomonay, Jairo Sinova, and Jeroen van den Brink. Chiral magnetic ex- citations and domain textures of g-wave altermagnets. Physical Review B, 112(14):144421, 2025

  34. [34]

    Spontaneous magnon decay in two-dimensional altermag- nets.Physical Review Research, 7(3):033208, 2025

    Niklas Cichutek, Peter Kopietz, and Andreas R¨ uckriegel. Spontaneous magnon decay in two-dimensional altermag- nets.Physical Review Research, 7(3):033208, 2025

  35. [35]

    Quantum fluctuations in two-dimensional altermagnets

    Niklas Cichutek, Peter Kopietz, and Andreas R¨ uckriegel. Quantum fluctuations in two-dimensional altermagnets. Physical Review B, 112(17):174404, 2025

  36. [36]

    Spontaneous magnon decays from nonrelativistic time-reversal symmetry breaking in altermagnets.Phys- ical Review B, 112(9):094442, 2025

    Rintaro Eto, Matthias Gohlke, Jairo Sinova, Masahito Mochizuki, Alexander L Chernyshev, and Alexander Mook. Spontaneous magnon decays from nonrelativistic time-reversal symmetry breaking in altermagnets.Phys- ical Review B, 112(9):094442, 2025

  37. [37]

    Fe site order and magnetic properties of fe1/4nbs2.Inorganic Chemistry, 62(44):18179–18188, 2023

    Erick A Lawrence, Xudong Huai, Dongwook Kim, Maxim Avdeev, Yu Chen, Grigorii Skorupskii, Akira Miura, Austin Ferrenti, Moritz Waibel, Shogo Kawaguchi, et al. Fe site order and magnetic properties of fe1/4nbs2.Inorganic Chemistry, 62(44):18179–18188, 2023

  38. [38]

    Crystal chemistry and design principles of alter- magnets.ACS Organic & Inorganic Au, 4(6):604–619, 2024

    Chao-Chun Wei, Erick Lawrence, Alyssa Tran, and Hui- wen Ji. Crystal chemistry and design principles of alter- magnets.ACS Organic & Inorganic Au, 4(6):604–619, 2024

  39. [39]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert. From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method.Phys. Rev. B, 59:1758–1775, Jan 1999

  40. [40]

    gener- alized gradient approximation made simple

    Yingkai Zhang and Weitao Yang. Comment on “gener- alized gradient approximation made simple”.Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:890–890, Jan 1998

  41. [41]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton. Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An lsda+u study.Phys. Rev. B, 57:1505–1509, Jan 1998

  42. [42]

    Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametriza- tion of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 132(15):154104, 04 2010

  43. [43]

    Ef- fect of the damping function in dispersion corrected den- sity functional theory.Journal of Computational Chem- istry, 32(7):1456–1465, 2011

    Stefan Grimme, Stephan Ehrlich, and Lars Goerigk. Ef- fect of the damping function in dispersion corrected den- sity functional theory.Journal of Computational Chem- istry, 32(7):1456–1465, 2011

  44. [44]

    Fender, Noah Schnitzer, Wuzhang Fang, Lopa Bhatt, Dingbin Huang, Amani Malik, Oscar Gonza- lez, Veronika Sunko, Lilia S

    Shannon S. Fender, Noah Schnitzer, Wuzhang Fang, Lopa Bhatt, Dingbin Huang, Amani Malik, Oscar Gonza- lez, Veronika Sunko, Lilia S. Xie, David A. Muller, Joseph Orenstein, Yuan Ping, Berit H. Goodge, and D. Kwabena Bediako. Unconventional superlattice ordering in interca- lated transition metal dichalcogenide v1/3nbs2.Journal of the American Chemical Soci...

  45. [45]

    M¨ ossbauer spectroscopic studies on fe xnbs2 single crystals.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 383(1-2):259–264, 2004

    Toshihide Tsuji and Hirokazu Watanabe. M¨ ossbauer spectroscopic studies on fe xnbs2 single crystals.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 383(1-2):259–264, 2004