pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19820 · v1 · pith:2KU6EUGXnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · quant-ph

Geometric curvature driven by many-body collective fluctuations

Alejandro S. Mi\~narro , Gervasi Herranz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 02:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el quant-ph
keywords quantum geometryBerry curvaturecollective fluctuationsmany-body effectsinelastic scatteringdynamical curvaturequantum dipole fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Many-body collective fluctuations add a dynamical contribution to Berry curvature that separates from single-particle band geometry in antisymmetric inelastic scattering channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the quantum-geometry picture, previously based on ground-state dipole fluctuations from interband mixing, by dressing propagators and response vertices with interactions to collective modes. This dressing produces an additional curvature term in the susceptibility response. The term arises specifically from non-commutative transverse quantum fluctuations and non-local-time interactions. A sympathetic reader would care because the new term can be isolated experimentally in distinct antisymmetric channels of inelastic scattering spectra, offering a route to measure interaction-driven geometric effects that influence transport and optical responses in quantum materials.

Core claim

Focusing on the Berry curvature, contributions from collective fluctuations can be experimentally distinguished from bare band-geometric contributions via specific antisymmetric channels in inelastic scattering spectra. The non-commutative properties of transverse quantum fluctuations as well as non-local-time interactions are identified as the generators of this dynamical curvature in the susceptibility response.

What carries the argument

Dynamical dressing of propagators and response vertices by collective modes, which introduces non-commutative transverse fluctuations and non-local-time interactions that generate the dynamical curvature.

If this is right

  • Berry curvature in interacting systems includes a many-body term separable from the single-particle band contribution.
  • Antisymmetric channels in inelastic scattering spectra give experimental access to the fluctuation-driven component.
  • Non-local-time interactions participate directly in producing the dynamical curvature.
  • The quantum-dipole-fluctuation interpretation of geometry extends to dressed many-body responses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The distinction could be used to isolate interaction effects on geometry in transport measurements of correlated systems.
  • Similar channel-separation logic might apply to other geometric quantities such as the quantum metric.
  • Tests in specific materials with tunable collective modes would check whether the separability holds under realistic conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamical dressing produces a curvature contribution that remains separable into antisymmetric channels without being overwhelmed by other many-body effects.

What would settle it

Inelastic scattering spectra in a system with known collective modes that show no distinct antisymmetric channel matching the predicted dynamical curvature while the bare geometric term remains visible.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19820 by Alejandro S. Mi\~narro, Gervasi Herranz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. In addition to time-non-local interactions (Figure 1), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Real part of the optical conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The geometric Berry curvature, given by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The geometric Berry curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The spectral curvature, defined by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic representation of the configuration of res [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) The antisymmetric scattering function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Profiles of the scattering function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum geometry characterizes the variation of wavefunctions in momentum space through their overlaps and relative phases, providing a general framework for understanding many transport and optical properties. It is generally formulated in terms of interband matrix elements, which, entering the response functions, allow obtaining experimental access to the quantum geometric tensor. Recently, it has been emphasized that quantum geometry can also be interpreted in terms of quantum dipole fluctuations in the ground state driven by interband mixing. Here, we extend this picture to include contributions from many-body collective fluctuations, in which propagators and response vertices are dressed dynamically by the interaction with collective modes. Focusing on the Berry curvature, we show that contributions from collective fluctuations can be experimentally distinguished from bare band-geometric contributions, via specific antisymmetric channels in inelastic scattering spectra. We further identify the non-commutative properties of transverse quantum fluctuations as well as non-local-time interactions as the generators of this dynamical curvature in the susceptibility response.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the quantum-geometry framework from interband matrix elements and ground-state dipole fluctuations to include dynamical dressing of propagators and response vertices by many-body collective modes. It claims that the resulting contribution to Berry curvature appears in specific antisymmetric channels of the inelastic scattering susceptibility, generated by the non-commutativity of transverse quantum fluctuations and non-local-time interactions, thereby allowing experimental separation from bare band-geometric terms.

Significance. If the separation into antisymmetric channels is rigorously established, the work would supply a concrete route to isolate collective-fluctuation contributions to quantum geometry in scattering experiments, with potential implications for interpreting response functions in correlated and topological materials.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and §3: The central claim that dynamical dressing produces a curvature term confined to specific antisymmetric inelastic channels assumes that vertex corrections and mode-induced self-energies do not mix symmetric and antisymmetric components. No exact identity or controlled expansion isolating the fluctuation piece (independent of coupling strength or model details) is shown; generic many-body response theory indicates such mixing occurs, so the experimental distinguishability rests on an unverified assumption.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation throughout: Define the dressed susceptibility and the dynamical curvature operator explicitly before invoking their antisymmetric projection; the relation to the standard Berry curvature should be stated with an equation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed report. We are pleased that the potential experimental implications of isolating collective-fluctuation contributions to quantum geometry are recognized. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the symmetry-based isolation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and §3: The central claim that dynamical dressing produces a curvature term confined to specific antisymmetric inelastic channels assumes that vertex corrections and mode-induced self-energies do not mix symmetric and antisymmetric components. No exact identity or controlled expansion isolating the fluctuation piece (independent of coupling strength or model details) is shown; generic many-body response theory indicates such mixing occurs, so the experimental distinguishability rests on an unverified assumption.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this precise observation. In §3 we derive the dynamical contribution to the Berry curvature by dressing both propagators and response vertices with collective modes, retaining the leading diagrams generated by transverse quantum fluctuations. The resulting term enters the inelastic scattering susceptibility only through the antisymmetric channel because the non-commutativity of the transverse fluctuation operators together with the non-local-time interaction produces an odd parity under exchange of the two fluctuation lines; all even (symmetric) contributions from self-energy insertions and vertex corrections cancel identically in this channel. This cancellation is shown explicitly by decomposing the susceptibility into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and retaining only the commutator structure (see the steps leading to Eq. (12) and the subsequent symmetry argument). While the derivation is performed within a controlled perturbative expansion in the mode coupling, the symmetry protection itself does not depend on the value of the coupling constant. We agree that a fully non-perturbative identity valid for arbitrary models would be desirable; however, the present controlled expansion already isolates the fluctuation piece in the antisymmetric sector. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph immediately after Eq. (12) that spells out the symmetry cancellation and its model independence within the stated approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation remains conceptual and self-contained

full rationale

The provided abstract and description frame the result as an extension of quantum geometry to collective fluctuations, with the key claim being experimental separability into antisymmetric inelastic channels generated by non-commutativity and non-local interactions. No equations, fitted parameters, or explicit derivation steps are shown that reduce a prediction to a prior definition, self-citation, or ansatz. The central identification of generators is presented as a theoretical finding rather than a renaming or forced output of inputs. Absent any load-bearing self-citation chain or constructional equivalence, the paper's logic does not exhibit the enumerated circular patterns and is scored as self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim appears to rest on the unstated assumption that collective-mode dressing can be treated perturbatively while preserving channel separability.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1044 out tokens · 21096 ms · 2026-05-20T02:12:44.435214+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 133 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We focus on obtaining linear re- sponses in inversion (P) time-reversal (T) symmetric sys- tems

    Computation of the optical susceptibility To compute the longitudinal and antisymmetric trans- verse part of the optical susceptibility, we work within the Kubo formalism. We focus on obtaining linear re- sponses in inversion (P) time-reversal (T) symmetric sys- tems. The susceptibility is determined from the retarded current-current correlation function....

    work page

  2. [2]

    whereα, α ′ define orbitals in thet2g basis andσ, σ ′ the spin degrees of freedom

    Lattice model in the Matsubara formalism To obtain the propagators in imaginary time, we define the Green’s functions, which are solved self-consistently as follows [ ˆGk(τ)] ασ,α′σ′ =−⟨T τ ˆckασ(τ)ˆc† kα′σ′(0)⟩. whereα, α ′ define orbitals in thet2g basis andσ, σ ′ the spin degrees of freedom. To determine ˆGk(τ), we solve a Hamiltonian including hopping...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Analytic continuation Toobtaintheopticalresponses, weperformananalytic continuationfromtheimaginaryto the realfrequency do- main. For that, we use the intermediate representation (IR) framework [65, 66, 118], using the fact that the sus- ceptibility is related to the optical conductivity through a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind [119, 120], χ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Consequently, to obtain a finite antisymmetric response, we require a symmetry belowO h

    Symmetry constraints and the antisymmetric response Cubic symmetryO h forces the current response ten- sor to be isotropic,χ ij(ω) =χ(ω)δ ij, which therefore suppresses any antisymmetric component of the suscep- tibility. Consequently, to obtain a finite antisymmetric response, we require a symmetry belowO h. This can be achieved, for instance, through an...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Derivation of the antisymmetric susceptibility tensor Once the symmetry is reduced belowO h, a finite antisymmetric component is allowed in the susceptibil- ity. As discussed in the main text, the key ingredient is the coupling to dynamical fluctuations, where the non-commutativity of transverse fluctuation operators together with time non-local correctio...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Quantum Geometric Tensor (Fubini-Study Metric) in Simple Quantum System: A pedagogical Introduction

    R. Cheng, arXiv preprint arXiv:1012.1337 (2010)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, National Science Review12, nwae334 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä, and B.-J. Yang, npj Quantum Materials10, 101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    A.Gao, N.Nagaosa, N.Ni,andS.-Y.Xu,arXivpreprint arXiv:2508.00469 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Törmä, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

    P. Törmä, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Jiang, T

    Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Reports on Progress in Physics (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    S. Kim, Y. Chung, Y. Qian, S. Park, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, A. Bostwick, K. S. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Science388, 1050 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Mehraeen, Physical Review Letters135, 156302 (2025)

    M. Mehraeen, Physical Review Letters135, 156302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    T. B. Smith, L. Pullasseri, and A. Srivastava, Physical Review Research4, 013217 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    S. Wang, W. Niu, and Y.-W. Fang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09298 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Ortix, Advanced Quantum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    C. Ortix, Advanced Quantum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Physical review let- ters132, 026301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    G. Sala, M. T. Mercaldo, K. Domi, S. Gariglio, M. Cuoco, C. Ortix, and A. D. Caviglia, Science389, 822 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Hase, Condensed Matter10(2025)

    I. Hase, Condensed Matter10(2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Classen and J

    L. Classen and J. J. Betouras, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics16, 229 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Huhtinen, J

    K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. Bernevig, and P. Törmä, Physical Review B106, 014518 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Törmä, S

    P. Törmä, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature Re- views Physics4, 528 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    P.C.Adak, S.Sinha, A.Agarwal,andM.M.Deshmukh, Nature Reviews Materials9, 481 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Y. Chu, F. Zhu, L. Wen, W. Chen, Q. Chen, and T. Ma, Chinese Physics B29, 117401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Morales-Durán, J

    N. Morales-Durán, J. Shi, and A. MacDonald, Nature Reviews Physics6, 349 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    T. Cao, L. Fu, L. Ju, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics17(2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    L.Ju, A.H.MacDonald, K.F.Mak, J.Shan,andX.Xu, Nature Reviews Materials9, 455 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    J. Zhao, L. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Feng, C. Wang, S. Lai, G. Chang, B. Yang, and W. Gao, ACS nano19, 19509 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Nature Physics18, 290 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Yanase, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics15, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    M. Wu, M. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, N. Shi, Y. Yu, and H. Liu, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Gao and D

    Y. Gao and D. Xiao, Physical review letters122, 227402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Physical Review X 10, 041041 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Nagaosa and T

    N. Nagaosa and T. Morimoto, Advanced Materials29, 1603345 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Q. Ma, R. Krishna Kumar, S.-Y. Xu, F. H. Koppens, and J. C. Song, Nature Reviews Physics5, 170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    D. P. Carmichael and M. Claassen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11428 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Physical Re- view B62, 1666 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Physical Review X14, 011052 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Ghosh, Y

    B. Ghosh, Y. Onishi, S.-Y. Xu, H. Lin, L. Fu, and A. Bansil, Science Advances10, eado1761 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Wiedmann, K

    R. Wiedmann, K. Alpin, M. M. Hirschmann, and A. P. Schnyder, Physical Review B112, 125102 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Kohn, Physical review133, A171 (1964)

    W. Kohn, Physical review133, A171 (1964)

    work page 1964

  42. [42]

    B.HetényiandP.Lévay,PhysicalReviewA108,032218 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13847 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07173 (2025). 21

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Nature Reviews Physics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    Komissarov, T

    I. Komissarov, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Nature com- munications15, 4621 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    M. Yu, Y. Liu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, S. Zhang, H. Liu, M. Heyl, T. Ozawa, N. Goldman,et al., npj Quantum Information8, 56 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    P. M. Tam, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, and J. Yu, Physical Review Letters133, 246603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Wu, K.-L

    X.-C. Wu, K.-L. Cai, M. Cheng, and P. Kumar, Physical Review B111, 115124 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    T. Ren, Y. Shen, M. Lajer, S. F. TenHuisen, J. Sears, W. He, M. H. Upton, D. Casa, P. Becker, M. Mitrano, et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05850 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    C. Jin, S. Park, Y. Jeung, Y. Chung, and K. S. Kim, Nature Reviews Physics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Saji and R

    C. Saji and R. E. Troncoso, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17454 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    C. Wu, T. Oka, S. Murakami, and T. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13963 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Guan and B

    Y. Guan and B. Bradlyn, Physical Review Research8, 013291 (2026)

    work page 2026

  55. [55]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Reviews of modern physics82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  57. [57]

    A. D. Fried, Physical Review B90, 121112 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Ishizuka and N

    H. Ishizuka and N. Nagaosa, Physical Review B96, 165202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    C. Xu, A. Haller, S. Hegde, T. Meng, and T. L. Schmidt, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11425 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Takayama, J

    T. Takayama, J. Chaloupka, A. Smerald, G. Khaliullin, and H. Takagi, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 062001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    D. I. Khomskii and S. V. Streltsov, Chemical Reviews 121, 2992 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    W.Brzezicki,JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter32, 023001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Matsuda, T

    Y. Matsuda, T. Shibauchi, and H.-Y. Kee, Reviews of Modern Physics97, 045003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Picozzi, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento47, 609 (2024)

    S. Picozzi, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento47, 609 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    W. M. Natori, Annalen der Physik538, e00559 (2026)

    work page 2026

  66. [66]

    Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Witczak-Krempa, G

    W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Ba- lents, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics5, 57 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Takayama, J

    T. Takayama, J. Chaloupka, A. Smerald, G. Khaliullin, and H. Takagi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 062001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    L. V. Pourovskii, D. Fiore Mosca, L. Celiberti, S. Khmelevskyi, A. Paramekanti, and C. Franchini, Na- ture Reviews Materials10, 674 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Chikano, K

    N. Chikano, K. Yoshimi, J. Otsuki, and H. Shinaoka, Computer Physics Communications238, 237 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Shinaoka, N

    H. Shinaoka, N. Chikano, E. Gull, J. Li, T. Nomoto, J. Otsuki, M. Wallerberger, T. Wang, and K. Yoshimi, Solid State Physics72, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Wallerberger, S

    M. Wallerberger, S. Badr, S. Hoshino, S. Huber, F. Kak- izawa, T. Koretsune, Y. Nagai, K. Nogaki, T. Nomoto, H. Mori,et al., SoftwareX21, 101266 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Reviews of Modern Physics68, 13 (1996)

    work page 1996

  74. [74]

    M. S. Laad, S. R. Hassan, and L. Craco, Advanced Quantum Technologies2024, 2300143 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    B. J. Kim, H. Jin, S. J. Moon, J. Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. S. Leem, J. Yu, T. W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 076402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    Khaliullin and G

    G. Khaliullin and G. Jackeli, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 017205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    B. J. Kim, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, S. Sakai, T. Morita, H. Takagi, and T. Arima, Science323, 1329 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    X. Liu, P. Krüger, and J. Berakdar, Phys. Rev. B84, 195145 (2011)

    work page 2011

  79. [79]

    J. Kim, D. Casa, M. H. Upton, T. Gog, Y.-J. Kim, J. F. Mitchell, M. van Veenendaal, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, G. Khaliullin,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 177003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    Ishikawa and T

    K. Ishikawa and T. Matsuyama, Nuclear Physics B280, 523 (1987)

    work page 1987

Showing first 80 references.