pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19948 · v1 · pith:GW57N7VJnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Iterative Solution of the Kerr Black Hole Metric

Poul H. Damgaard , Hojin Lee , Kanghoon Lee , Tabasum Rahnuma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords Kerr black holeperturbative expansionharmonic gaugeEinstein equationsrecursive solutiondouble expansiongeneral relativityblack hole metric
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Kerr black hole metric can be obtained by recursively solving the Einstein equations to arbitrary order in a double expansion in G and spin, but exact re-summation requires adding redundant harmonic coordinate functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an iterative method for constructing the metric of a rotating Kerr black hole by solving the Einstein equations order by order. Because the metric depends on both Newton's constant and the spin parameter, the expansion is performed in two variables simultaneously. Recursion relations derived in the harmonic gauge permit computation of the metric components to any desired order. To bring the resulting series into agreement with the known exact Kerr solution in the same gauge, extra terms must be added that amount to redefining the coordinates by harmonic functions. This procedure also involves careful handling of dimensional regularization when performing Fourier transforms.

Core claim

Using a recursive solution of the Einstein equations, we consider the perturbative expansion of the metric corresponding to a Kerr black hole. Because the metric is a function of two parameters, Newton's constant G and the Kerr spin parameter a, the perturbation theory naturally becomes a double expansion. In harmonic gauge the recursion relations can be solved to arbitrarily high orders in these two expansion parameters but to re-sum the series into the closed-form harmonic gauge metric requires the introduction of terms that are redundant and correspond to the addition of harmonic functions to the coordinates. Issues related to dimensional regularization of Fourier transforms are explained

What carries the argument

The recursion relations from the Einstein equations in harmonic gauge applied to the double expansion in G and a

If this is right

  • The metric components can be computed to arbitrarily high orders in the two parameters using the recursion relations
  • The method provides a systematic way to generate perturbative approximations for the rotating black hole spacetime
  • Dimensional regularization issues in Fourier transforms must be handled carefully to ensure consistent results
  • The physical content of the metric is unchanged by the addition of the redundant harmonic coordinate terms

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Gauge freedom in coordinate choices can be used deliberately to simplify the appearance of perturbative series in gravity
  • The recursive technique might extend to constructing perturbative expansions for other known exact solutions in general relativity
  • Such methods could help bridge perturbative and non-perturbative descriptions in strong gravitational fields

Load-bearing premise

That the addition of redundant harmonic functions to the coordinates preserves the physical content of the metric while allowing the perturbative series to match the known closed-form Kerr solution in harmonic gauge

What would settle it

Directly re-summing the perturbative series both with and without the added harmonic terms and verifying whether only the version with them reproduces the standard harmonic-gauge Kerr metric at all orders would settle the claim

read the original abstract

Using a recursive solution of the Einstein equations, we consider the perturbative expansion of the metric corresponding to a Kerr black hole. Because the metric is a function of two parameters, Newton's constant G and the Kerr spin parameter a, the perturbation theory naturally becomes a double expansion. In harmonic gauge the recursion relations can be solved to arbitrarily high orders in these two expansion parameters but to re-sum the series into the closed-form harmonic gauge metric requires the introduction of terms that are redundant and correspond to the addition of harmonic functions to the coordinates. Issues related to dimensional regularization of Fourier transforms are explained in detail.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a recursive perturbative solution to the Einstein equations for the Kerr black hole in harmonic gauge, formulated as a double expansion in Newton's constant G and the spin parameter a. It asserts that the resulting recursion relations are solvable to arbitrarily high orders in these parameters. Re-summation of the series to recover the known closed-form Kerr metric in harmonic gauge requires the addition of redundant terms, which the authors identify as harmonic functions added to the coordinates. The paper also provides a detailed discussion of dimensional-regularization issues arising in the Fourier transforms employed in the solution procedure.

Significance. A systematic recursive method for generating high-order perturbative corrections to the Kerr metric could be useful for applications in numerical relativity or post-Newtonian expansions involving rotation. The explicit treatment of dimensional regularization in Fourier space may offer technical guidance for similar calculations. However, because the procedure solves the vacuum Einstein equations that define the Kerr solution and matches the known metric only after introducing coordinate redundancies, the work functions primarily as a perturbative reconstruction rather than an independent derivation; its significance therefore hinges on whether the recursion yields new computational or structural insights beyond the existing closed-form expression.

major comments (2)
  1. [Recursion relations and re-summation discussion] The central claim that the recursion relations are solvable to arbitrary orders is presented without a general closed-form pattern or inductive proof for the solution at all orders in G and a; instead, matching to the exact harmonic-gauge Kerr metric is achieved only by adding redundant terms after the fact (see the discussion of re-summation following the recursion relations). This leaves open whether the perturbative construction is complete on its own or requires external knowledge of the target metric.
  2. [Re-summation to closed-form metric] The re-summation procedure relies on the existence of all-order harmonic coordinate adjustments that cancel the difference between the perturbative sum and the exact Kerr metric while remaining within the harmonic gauge and preserving the vacuum equations at every finite order. No explicit construction or obstruction-free argument for these adjustments is supplied, which is load-bearing for the claim that the series can be resummed to the closed-form solution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a clearer statement that the re-summation step is not automatic but requires the explicit addition of coordinate redundancies.
  2. [Setup of the perturbative expansion] Notation for the double expansion parameters (G and a) and the order counting should be introduced consistently in the first section where the recursion is defined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to clarify the self-contained nature of the finite-order recursion and the reasoning behind the re-summation procedure.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Recursion relations and re-summation discussion] The central claim that the recursion relations are solvable to arbitrary orders is presented without a general closed-form pattern or inductive proof for the solution at all orders in G and a; instead, matching to the exact harmonic-gauge Kerr metric is achieved only by adding redundant terms after the fact (see the discussion of re-summation following the recursion relations). This leaves open whether the perturbative construction is complete on its own or requires external knowledge of the target metric.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The recursion relations follow directly from substituting the double expansion in G and a into the vacuum Einstein equations in harmonic gauge. At each order the resulting equation for the metric correction is a linear inhomogeneous wave equation whose source is built exclusively from products of lower-order terms. These equations are solved in Fourier space using dimensional regularization, with the particular solution uniquely determined once homogeneous solutions are set to zero by our coordinate choice. Consequently the procedure generates the metric correction at any finite order without invoking the closed-form Kerr solution. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the revised manuscript stating that the construction is self-contained for all finite orders. We do not supply a closed-form expression for the general term, as that would amount to a non-perturbative solution of the nonlinear system. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Re-summation to closed-form metric] The re-summation procedure relies on the existence of all-order harmonic coordinate adjustments that cancel the difference between the perturbative sum and the exact Kerr metric while remaining within the harmonic gauge and preserving the vacuum equations at every finite order. No explicit construction or obstruction-free argument for these adjustments is supplied, which is load-bearing for the claim that the series can be resummed to the closed-form solution.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that re-summation invokes harmonic coordinate adjustments. Because both the exact Kerr metric (expressed in harmonic coordinates) and the perturbative series (to any finite order) satisfy the vacuum Einstein equations in harmonic gauge, their difference at each order obeys the homogeneous linearized Einstein equations. Solutions to these homogeneous equations correspond precisely to infinitesimal coordinate transformations that preserve the harmonic condition. We have inserted a short paragraph in the revised version that makes this obstruction-free argument explicit, showing that no inconsistency arises at finite orders. An explicit all-order formula for the adjustments is not constructed, since that would essentially reconstruct the exact solution from the series. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A general closed-form pattern or formal inductive proof for the solution at all orders in G and a.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Re-summation to closed-form harmonic-gauge Kerr requires redundant coordinate adjustments chosen to match the known solution

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "In harmonic gauge the recursion relations can be solved to arbitrarily high orders in these two expansion parameters but to re-sum the series into the closed-form harmonic gauge metric requires the introduction of terms that are redundant and correspond to the addition of harmonic functions to the coordinates."

    The recursion solves the vacuum Einstein equations whose exact solution is the Kerr metric. Re-summing the perturbative series to the closed-form harmonic-gauge Kerr metric is achieved only by adding redundant terms identified as harmonic coordinate adjustments; these adjustments are introduced specifically to enforce agreement with the known exact solution, rendering the final closed-form result equivalent to the input Kerr metric by construction.

full rationale

The recursion relations derived from the Einstein equations are solved order-by-order in the double expansion, providing an independent perturbative construction. However, the central claim that the series re-sums to the exact closed-form metric in harmonic gauge rests on the introduction of additional redundant terms. These terms are selected precisely so the resummed expression coincides with the known Kerr metric, reducing that re-summation step to a matching procedure by construction rather than an autonomous derivation from the recursion alone.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard Einstein equations of general relativity together with the choice of harmonic gauge and the assumption that a perturbative double expansion in G and a is valid for the Kerr geometry.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Einstein equations hold and can be solved recursively in harmonic gauge for the Kerr geometry.
    Invoked as the basis for the iterative construction described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1277 out tokens · 75292 ms · 2026-05-20T03:53:41.130257+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. H. Damgaard and K. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) no.25, 251603 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.251603 [arXiv:2403.13216 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.251603 2024

  2. [2]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plante and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no. 17, 171601 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.171601 [arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.171601 2018

  3. [3]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no. 25, 251101 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.251101 [arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.251101 2018

  4. [4]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell, JHEP02, 137 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)137 [arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)137 2019

  5. [5]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no.20, 201603 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.201603 [arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]] – 40 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.201603 2019

  6. [6]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 206 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)206 [arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)206 2019

  7. [7]

    Cristofoli, N

    A. Cristofoli, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. D100, no.8, 084040 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.084040 [arXiv:1906.01579 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.084040 2019

  8. [8]

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad and A. Helset, JHEP11, 070 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)070 [arXiv:1908.10308 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)070 2019

  9. [9]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, A. Cristofoli and P. H. Damgaard, JHEP08, 038 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2020)038 [arXiv:1910.09366 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)038 2020

  10. [10]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B811, 135924 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135924 [arXiv:2008.12743 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135924 2020

  11. [11]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rept.1083(2024), 1-169 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.06.002 [arXiv:2306.16488 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.06.002 2024

  12. [12]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. D104, no.2, 026009 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.026009 [arXiv:2104.04510 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.026009 2021

  13. [13]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, JHEP08(2021), 172 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)172 [arXiv:2105.05218 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)172 2021

  14. [14]

    P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove, JHEP11, 213 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)213 [arXiv:2107.12891 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)213 2021

  15. [15]

    K. Cho, K. Kim and K. Lee, JHEP01, 186 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)186 [arXiv:2109.06392 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)186 2022

  16. [16]

    Lee, JHEP05, 051 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)051 [arXiv:2202.08133 [hep-th]]

    K. Lee, JHEP05, 051 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)051 [arXiv:2202.08133 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2022)051 2022

  17. [17]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, JHEP09(2023), 183 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)183 [arXiv:2307.04746 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2023)183 2023

  18. [18]

    K. Cho, K. Kim and K. Lee, JHEP05(2024), 050 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)050 [arXiv:2311.01284 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)050 2024

  19. [19]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C. H. Shen and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.6, 065014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.065014 [arXiv:2005.03071 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.065014 2021

  20. [20]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) no.20, 201402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.201402 [arXiv:2203.06202 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.201402 2023

  21. [21]

    P. H. Damgaard, J. Hoogeveen, A. Luna and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.12, 124030 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.124030 [arXiv:2208.11028 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.124030 2022

  22. [22]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy, G. Travaglini and C. Wen, JHEP12 (2022), 101 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)101 [arXiv:2208.05886 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2022)101 2022

  23. [23]

    Adamo and R

    T. Adamo and R. Gonzo, JHEP05(2023), 088 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)088 [arXiv:2212.13269 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)088 2023

  24. [24]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen and M. Skowronek, JHEP06(2023), 170 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)170 [arXiv:2302.00498 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)170 2023

  25. [25]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, C. Heissenberg and A. Helset, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.3, 036007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.036007 [arXiv:2310.05832 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.036007 2024

  26. [26]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, C. Su and T. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) no.7, 071601 doi:10.1103/k5g2-q38q [arXiv:2503.20538 [hep-th]]. – 41 –

    work page doi:10.1103/k5g2-q38q 2026

  27. [27]

    Unexpected Symmetries of Kerr Black Hole Scattering

    D. Akpinar, G. R. Brown, R. Gonzo and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.10, 10 doi:10.1103/dd5t-8dn5 [arXiv:2508.10761 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/dd5t-8dn5 2026

  28. [28]

    Brunello, S

    G. Brunello, S. De Angelis and D. A. Kosower, [arXiv:2511.05412 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104029 [arXiv:hep-th/0409156 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.104029 2006

  30. [30]

    Leading order finite size effects with spins for inspiralling compact binaries

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, JHEP06, 059 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)059 [arXiv:1410.2601 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)059 2015

  31. [31]

    Kälin and R

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, JHEP11, 106 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)106 [arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)106 2020

  32. [32]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, JHEP02, 048 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)048 [arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2021)048 2021

  33. [33]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.20, 201103 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.201103 [arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.201103 2021

  34. [34]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, Phys. Lett. B831, 137203 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137203 [arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137203 2022

  35. [35]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer, JHEP10, 128 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)128 [arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2022)128 2022

  36. [36]

    Kälin, J

    G. Kälin, J. Neef and R. A. Porto, JHEP01, 140 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)140 [arXiv:2207.00580 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)140 2023

  37. [37]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, no.15, 151401 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.151401 [arXiv:2306.01714 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.151401 2023

  38. [38]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, JHEP09(2023), 059 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)059 [arXiv:2306.11454 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2023)059 2023

  39. [39]

    Ben-Shahar, JHEP03, 108 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)108 [arXiv:2311.01430 [hep-th]]

    M. Ben-Shahar, JHEP03, 108 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)108 [arXiv:2311.01430 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)108 2024

  40. [40]

    P. H. Damgaard, H. Lee, K. Lee and T. Rahnuma, [arXiv:2603.16493 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    M. J. Duff, Phys. Rev. D7(1973), 2317-2326 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2317

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2317 1973

  42. [42]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D68(2003), 084005 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 069904] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.084005 [arXiv:hep-th/0211071 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.084005 2003

  43. [43]

    Gambino, P

    C. Gambino, P. Pani and F. Riccioni, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.12, 124018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124018 [arXiv:2403.16574 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.124018 2024

  44. [44]

    Scheopner and J

    T. Scheopner and J. Vines, JHEP12(2024), 060 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)060 [arXiv:2311.18421 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)060 2024

  45. [45]

    Bianchi, C

    M. Bianchi, C. Gambino, P. Pani and F. Riccioni, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.8, 084013 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.084013 [arXiv:2412.01771 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.084013 2025

  46. [46]

    Lin and C

    W. Lin and C. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) no.8, 087502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.087502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.087502 2014

  47. [47]

    The Schwarzschild metric: It's the coordinates, stupid!

    P. Fromholz, E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Am. J. Phys.82(2014), 295 doi:10.1119/1.4850396 [arXiv:1308.0394 [gr-qc]]. – 42 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1119/1.4850396 2014

  48. [48]

    Israel, Phys

    W. Israel, Phys. Rev. D2(1970), 641-646 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.641 – 43 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.641 1970