pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19975 · v1 · pith:5WWBXCX5new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Learning with Foresight: Enhancing Neural Routing Policy via Multi-Node Lookahead Prediction

Xia Jiang , Yaoxin Wu , Yew-Soon Ong , Yingqian Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords neural routing policiesvehicle routing problemslookahead predictionauxiliary supervisiongeneralizationcombinatorial optimizationtraining strategies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-node lookahead prediction during training lets neural routing policies anticipate future decisions and generalize better without slowing inference.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Neural policies for vehicle routing currently train by predicting only the immediate next node, which produces shortsighted choices over long routes. The paper proposes Multi-node Lookahead Prediction, a training approach that adds supervision for several future nodes at once through auxiliary modules. These modules are causal and are removed after training, so they impose no cost or change during actual solution construction. The added signals give the policy longer-range context, which the experiments show improves solution quality and generalization to new problem sizes, distributions, and real instances.

Core claim

The central claim is that extending supervised training with multi-depth auxiliary supervision for simultaneous prediction of multiple future nodes equips neural routing policies with long-range contextual understanding. This is achieved by causal and discardable MnLP modules that operate only during training, so the resulting policy constructs better solutions and generalizes across problem sizes and distributions while preserving full inference efficiency.

What carries the argument

Multi-node Lookahead Prediction (MnLP) modules that supply multi-depth auxiliary supervision signals exclusively during training.

If this is right

  • Policies trained with MnLP produce higher-quality routes than standard next-node training on standard benchmarks.
  • The same policies generalize more reliably when problem size or distribution changes.
  • MnLP integrates into different neural routing architectures with zero added inference cost.
  • The multi-step supervision directly strengthens long-horizon planning capacity in the learned policy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same auxiliary-prediction idea could be tested on other sequential construction tasks such as job-shop scheduling or TSP variants.
  • Varying the lookahead depth as a hyper-parameter might reveal an optimal horizon that balances training cost against final performance.
  • If the learned foresight transfers across problem classes, it could reduce the need for hand-crafted heuristics in broader combinatorial settings.

Load-bearing premise

That auxiliary multi-step node predictions can be supplied by temporary training-only modules without biasing the learned policy or adding any overhead once the modules are discarded.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment showing no measurable gain in solution quality or cross-size generalization on held-out routing instances when MnLP is added versus standard next-node training would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19975 by Xia Jiang, Yaoxin Wu, Yew-Soon Ong, Yingqian Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The overall MnLP model architecture. xt−1 as part of the decoding context. We generalize this pro￾cess to a multi-node prediction setting: for any k > 0, the k-th MnLP module predicts node xt+k using an intermediate context representation h (k) t, obtained by combining 1) the representation from the (k − 1)-th module, h (k−1)t, and 2) the embedding of the ground-truth node xt+k−1, h (0) t+k−1 (for k = 1, h… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The distribution of optimality gap across different problem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: TSP1000 instances with different distributions. (a) Rota [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The model performance on TSP instances with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neural policies have shown promise in solving vehicle routing problems due to their reduced reliance on handcrafted heuristics. However, current training paradigms suffer from a fundamental limitation: they primarily focus on next-node prediction for solution construction, resulting in myopic decision-making that undermines long-horizon planning capacity. To this end, we introduce Multi-node Lookahead Prediction (MnLP), a novel training strategy that extends the supervised learning paradigm to predict multiple future nodes simultaneously. We incorporate causal and discardable MnLP modules that operate exclusively during training, facilitating models to anticipate multi-step decisions while preserving inference-time efficiency. By incorporating multi-depth auxiliary supervision into the loss function, MnLP equips neural policies with the ability of long-range contextual understanding. Experimentally, MnLP outperforms existing training methods, improving the generalization capability of neural policies across various problem sizes, distributions, and real-world benchmarks. Moreover, MnLP can be seamlessly integrated into diverse neural architectures without introducing additional inference overhead.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Multi-node Lookahead Prediction (MnLP), a training-only augmentation for neural policies solving vehicle routing problems. It extends standard next-node supervised learning by adding causal, discardable multi-depth auxiliary prediction modules that supervise the model on multiple future nodes simultaneously. These modules are removed at inference, so the approach claims to improve long-horizon planning and generalization across problem sizes, distributions, and real-world instances without adding inference cost or bias.

Significance. If the empirical gains hold under rigorous controls, MnLP would constitute a practical and architecture-agnostic improvement to the training of neural combinatorial solvers. The emphasis on training-only auxiliary supervision that preserves exact inference efficiency is a clear strength, as is the reported consistency of gains across scales and benchmarks. Such a method could meaningfully reduce the myopic behavior that currently limits learned routing policies.

major comments (2)
  1. §3.2, Eq. (5)–(7): the multi-depth auxiliary loss is presented as a simple sum of cross-entropy terms at each lookahead depth; it is unclear whether the depths are treated as conditionally independent or whether the model is required to produce a coherent multi-step trajectory. If the former, the supervision may encourage locally consistent but globally inconsistent predictions, which would undermine the claimed long-range contextual understanding.
  2. §4.3, Table 2: the generalization experiments report average gaps to optimal or best-known solutions, but do not include per-instance variance or statistical significance tests across the 10 random seeds. Given that the central claim is improved generalization, the absence of error bars or paired statistical tests makes it difficult to judge whether the reported improvements are robust or could be explained by training stochasticity.
minor comments (3)
  1. The notation for the MnLP module outputs (e.g., the distinction between the main policy head and the auxiliary heads) is introduced in §3.1 but reused without redefinition in the loss equations; a single consolidated notation table would improve readability.
  2. Figure 3 (ablation on lookahead depth) would benefit from an additional curve showing the effect of increasing depth on training time, even though inference cost is unchanged, to quantify the training overhead.
  3. The manuscript cites prior neural VRP works but does not discuss how MnLP relates to existing lookahead or beam-search techniques used at inference time in other papers; a short related-work paragraph would help situate the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive recommendation of minor revision and for the constructive comments, which help clarify key aspects of our method. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3.2, Eq. (5)–(7): the multi-depth auxiliary loss is presented as a simple sum of cross-entropy terms at each lookahead depth; it is unclear whether the depths are treated as conditionally independent or whether the model is required to produce a coherent multi-step trajectory. If the former, the supervision may encourage locally consistent but globally inconsistent predictions, which would undermine the claimed long-range contextual understanding.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this potential ambiguity. The MnLP modules are causal by design: the auxiliary prediction at each depth d is conditioned on the node embeddings and previous predictions from depths 1 to d-1, ensuring that the multi-step supervision encourages coherent trajectories rather than independent local decisions. We will revise Section 3.2 to explicitly describe this conditioning and add a short paragraph explaining how the causal structure supports long-range consistency. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4.3, Table 2: the generalization experiments report average gaps to optimal or best-known solutions, but do not include per-instance variance or statistical significance tests across the 10 random seeds. Given that the central claim is improved generalization, the absence of error bars or paired statistical tests makes it difficult to judge whether the reported improvements are robust or could be explained by training stochasticity.

    Authors: We agree that reporting variability and statistical significance would strengthen the presentation of the generalization results. In the revised manuscript we will update Table 2 to include standard deviations across the 10 random seeds and will add a supplementary table or footnote reporting paired statistical tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank) between MnLP and the baselines to confirm that the observed gaps are statistically significant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is the introduction of MnLP as an independent training augmentation: causal, discardable modules that add multi-depth auxiliary supervision to the loss function exclusively during training. This extends the next-node prediction paradigm without redefining any fitted parameters or prior results as predictions. The claimed improvement in long-range contextual understanding and generalization across sizes, distributions, and benchmarks is presented as an empirical outcome of the new loss terms, supported by implementation details and ablation studies rather than by construction from inputs. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is invoked as load-bearing; the method is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The approach rests on standard supervised learning assumptions for sequential decision tasks plus the new training modules; no explicit free parameters or external benchmarks are detailed in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Supervised learning with auxiliary multi-step predictions improves long-horizon planning capacity in neural routing policies.
    Invoked when extending the paradigm to predict multiple future nodes simultaneously.
invented entities (1)
  • Causal and discardable MnLP modules no independent evidence
    purpose: Enable multi-node lookahead prediction exclusively during training.
    New components introduced to support the training strategy without external independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5702 in / 1116 out tokens · 40329 ms · 2026-05-20T07:20:40.077765+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We incorporate causal and discardable MnLP modules that operate exclusively during training, facilitating models to anticipate multi-step decisions while preserving inference-time efficiency. By incorporating multi-depth auxiliary supervision into the loss function...

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The pitfalls of next-token pre- diction

    [Bachmann and Nagarajan, 2024] Gregor Bachmann and Vaishnavh Nagarajan. The pitfalls of next-token pre- diction. In41st International Conference on Machine Learning,

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Routefinder: Towards foundation models for vehicle routing problems

    [Bertoet al., 2025 ] Federico Berto, Chuanbo Hua, Nayeli Zepeda, Andr ´e Hottung, Niels Wouda, Leon Lan, Juny- oung Park, Kevin Tierney, and Jinkyoo Park. Routefinder: Towards foundation models for vehicle routing problems. Transactions on Machine Learning Research,

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Evolving diverse tsp instances by means of novel and creative mutation operators

    [Bosseket al., 2019 ] Jakob Bossek, Pascal Kerschke, Aneta Neumann, Markus Wagner, Frank Neumann, and Heike Trautmann. Evolving diverse tsp instances by means of novel and creative mutation operators. InProceedings of the 15th ACM/SIGEVO conference on foundations of ge- netic algorithms, pages 58–71,

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Principles of genetic circuit design.Nature methods, 11(5):508–520,

    [Brophy and V oigt, 2014] Jennifer AN Brophy and Christo- pher A V oigt. Principles of genetic circuit design.Nature methods, 11(5):508–520,

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    [Bulloet al., 2011 ] Francesco Bullo, Emilio Frazzoli, Marco Pavone, Ketan Savla, and Stephen L. Smith. Dynamic ve- hicle routing for robotic systems.Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(9):1482–1504,

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Select and optimize: Learning to solve large-scale tsp instances

    [Chenget al., 2023 ] Hanni Cheng, Haosi Zheng, Ya Cong, Weihao Jiang, and Shiliang Pu. Select and optimize: Learning to solve large-scale tsp instances. InInterna- tional Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1219–1231,

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Princeton university press,

    [Cooket al., 2011 ] William J Cook, David L Applegate, Robert E Bixby, and Vasek Chv ´atal.The traveling sales- man problem: a computational study. Princeton university press,

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Deepseek-v3 technical report,

    [DeepSeek-AIet al., 2025 ] DeepSeek-AI, Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report,

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    BQ- NCO: Bisimulation quotienting for efficient neural com- binatorial optimization

    [Drakulicet al., 2023 ] Darko Drakulic, Sofia Michel, Flo- rian Mai, Arnaud Sors, and Jean-Marc Andreoli. BQ- NCO: Bisimulation quotienting for efficient neural com- binatorial optimization. InThirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems,

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    INViT: A generalizable routing problem solver with invariant nested view transformer

    [Fanget al., 2024 ] Han Fang, Zhihao Song, Paul Weng, and Yutong Ban. INViT: A generalizable routing problem solver with invariant nested view transformer. InPro- ceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 235, pages 12973–12992, July

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Or-tools routing library,

    [Furnon and Perron, 2024] Vincent Furnon and Laurent Per- ron. Or-tools routing library,

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Towards generalizable neural solvers for vehicle routing problems via ensemble with transferrable local policy

    [Gaoet al., 2024 ] Chengrui Gao, Haopu Shang, Ke Xue, Dong Li, and Chao Qian. Towards generalizable neural solvers for vehicle routing problems via ensemble with transferrable local policy. InProceedings of the 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Multi-token prediction needs registers,

    [Gerontopouloset al., 2025 ] Anastasios Gerontopoulos, Spyros Gidaris, and Nikos Komodakis. Multi-token prediction needs registers,

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Better & faster large language models via multi- token prediction

    [Gloeckleet al., 2024 ] Fabian Gloeckle, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Baptiste Rozi `ere, David Lopez-Paz, and Gabriel Syn- naeve. Better & faster large language models via multi- token prediction. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning,

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    An extension of the lin-kernighan-helsgaun tsp solver for constrained travel- ing salesman and vehicle routing problems.Roskilde: Roskilde University, 12:966–980,

    [Helsgaun, 2017] Keld Helsgaun. An extension of the lin-kernighan-helsgaun tsp solver for constrained travel- ing salesman and vehicle routing problems.Roskilde: Roskilde University, 12:966–980,

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Efficient active search for combina- torial optimization problems

    [Hottunget al., 2022 ] Andr´e Hottung, Yeong-Dae Kwon, and Kevin Tierney. Efficient active search for combina- torial optimization problems. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    CAMP: Collaborative Attention Model with Profiles for Vehicle Routing Problems

    [Huaet al., 2025 ] Chuanbo Hua, Federico Berto, Jiwoo Son, Seunghyun Kang, Changhyun Kwon, and Jinkyoo Park. CAMP: Collaborative Attention Model with Profiles for Vehicle Routing Problems. InProceedings of the 2025 In- ternational Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi- agent Systems (AAMAS),

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Rethinking light decoder-based solvers for vehicle routing problems

    [Huanget al., 2025 ] Ziwei Huang, Jianan Zhou, Zhiguang Cao, and Yixin Xu. Rethinking light decoder-based solvers for vehicle routing problems. In13th International Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Ensemble-based deep rein- forcement learning for vehicle routing problems under dis- tribution shift

    [Jianget al., 2023 ] Yuan Jiang, Zhiguang Cao, Yaoxin Wu, Wen Song, and Jie Zhang. Ensemble-based deep rein- forcement learning for vehicle routing problems under dis- tribution shift. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, volume 36, pages 53112–53125,

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Bridging large language models and op- timization: A unified framework for text-attributed combi- natorial optimization.arXiv:2408.12214,

    [Jianget al., 2024 ] Xia Jiang, Yaoxin Wu, Yuan Wang, and Yingqian Zhang. Bridging large language models and op- timization: A unified framework for text-attributed combi- natorial optimization.arXiv:2408.12214,

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Large language mod- els as end-to-end combinatorial optimization solvers

    [Jianget al., 2025 ] Xia Jiang, Yaoxin Wu, Minshuo Li, Zhiguang Cao, and Yingqian Zhang. Large language mod- els as end-to-end combinatorial optimization solvers. In The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems,

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Learning to CROSS exchange to solve min-max vehicle routing problems

    [Kimet al., 2023 ] Minjun Kim, Junyoung Park, and Jinkyoo Park. Learning to CROSS exchange to solve min-max vehicle routing problems. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Symmetric replay training: Enhancing sample efficiency in deep reinforcement learning for com- binatorial optimization

    [Kimet al., 2024 ] Hyeonah Kim, Minsu Kim, Sungsoo Ahn, and Jinkyoo Park. Symmetric replay training: Enhancing sample efficiency in deep reinforcement learning for com- binatorial optimization. InProceedings of the 41st Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning,

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Neural genetic search in discrete spaces

    [Kimet al., 2025 ] Hyeonah Kim, Sanghyeok Choi, Jiwoo Son, Jinkyoo Park, and Changhyun Kwon. Neural genetic search in discrete spaces. InForty-second International Conference on Machine Learning,

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Attention, learn to solve routing problems! In International Conference on Learning Representations,

    [Koolet al., 2019 ] Wouter Kool, Herke van Hoof, and Max Welling. Attention, learn to solve routing problems! In International Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Pomo: Policy optimization with multiple optima for reinforcement learning

    [Kwonet al., 2020 ] Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, By- oungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon, Youngjune Gwon, and Seungjai Min. Pomo: Policy optimization with multiple optima for reinforcement learning. InAdvances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems,

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Learning feature embedding refiner for solving vehicle routing problems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(11):15279–15291,

    [Liet al., 2024 ] Jingwen Li, Yining Ma, Zhiguang Cao, Yaoxin Wu, Wen Song, Jie Zhang, and Yeow Meng Chee. Learning feature embedding refiner for solving vehicle routing problems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(11):15279–15291,

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Bopo: Neural combina- torial optimization via best-anchored and objective-guided preference optimization

    [Liaoet al., 2025 ] Zijun Liao, Jinbiao Chen, Debing Wang, Zizhen Zhang, and Jiahai Wang. Bopo: Neural combina- torial optimization via best-anchored and objective-guided preference optimization. InForty-second International Conference on Machine Learning,

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    A mixed-curvature based pre-training paradigm for multi-task vehicle routing solver

    [Liuet al., 2025 ] Suyu Liu, Zhiguang Cao, Shanshan Feng, and Yew-Soon Ong. A mixed-curvature based pre-training paradigm for multi-task vehicle routing solver. In42nd International Conference on Machine Learning,

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Neural combinatorial optimization with heavy decoder: Toward large scale generalization

    [Luoet al., 2023 ] Fu Luo, Xi Lin, Fei Liu, Qingfu Zhang, and Zhenkun Wang. Neural combinatorial optimization with heavy decoder: Toward large scale generalization. In The 37th Annual Conference on Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems,

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Boosting neural combinatorial optimization for large-scale vehicle routing problems

    [Luoet al., 2025 ] Fu Luo, Xi Lin, Yaoxin Wu, Zhenkun Wang, Tong Xialiang, Mingxuan Yuan, and Qingfu Zhang. Boosting neural combinatorial optimization for large-scale vehicle routing problems. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    TSPLIB—a traveling sales- man problem library.ORSA Journal on Computing, 3(4):376–384,

    [Reinelt, 1991] Gerhard Reinelt. TSPLIB—a traveling sales- man problem library.ORSA Journal on Computing, 3(4):376–384,

    work page 1991

  33. [33]

    A systematic literature review of the vehicle routing prob- lem in reverse logistics operations.Computers & Indus- trial Engineering, 177:109011,

    [Sar and Ghadimi, 2023] Kubra Sar and Pezhman Ghadimi. A systematic literature review of the vehicle routing prob- lem in reverse logistics operations.Computers & Indus- trial Engineering, 177:109011,

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Blockwise parallel decoding for deep autore- gressive models.Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 31,

    [Sternet al., 2018 ] Mitchell Stern, Noam Shazeer, and Jakob Uszkoreit. Blockwise parallel decoding for deep autore- gressive models.Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 31,

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    New benchmark instances for the capacitated ve- hicle routing problem.European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3):845–858,

    [Uchoaet al., 2017 ] Eduardo Uchoa, Diego Pecin, Artur Pessoa, Marcus Poggi, Thibaut Vidal, and Anand Subra- manian. New benchmark instances for the capacitated ve- hicle routing problem.European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3):845–858,

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30,

    [Vaswaniet al., 2017 ] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30,

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Hybrid genetic search for the cvrp: Open-source implementation and swap* neighbor- hood.Computers & Operations Research, 140:105643,

    [Vidal, 2022] Thibaut Vidal. Hybrid genetic search for the cvrp: Open-source implementation and swap* neighbor- hood.Computers & Operations Research, 140:105643,

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Pointer networks.Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 28,

    [Vinyalset al., 2015 ] Oriol Vinyals, Meire Fortunato, and Navdeep Jaitly. Pointer networks.Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 28,

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Asp: Learn a universal neural solver!IEEE Trans- actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(6):4102–4114,

    [Wanget al., 2024 ] Chenguang Wang, Zhouliang Yu, Stephen McAleer, Tianshu Yu, and Yaodong Yang. Asp: Learn a universal neural solver!IEEE Trans- actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(6):4102–4114,

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Distance-aware attention reshaping for enhancing generalization of neural solvers.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 36(10):18900–18914,

    [Wanget al., 2025 ] Yang Wang, Ya-Hui Jia, Wei-Neng Chen, and Yi Mei. Distance-aware attention reshaping for enhancing generalization of neural solvers.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 36(10):18900–18914,

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Learning improvement heuris- tics for solving routing problems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(9):5057– 5069,

    [Wuet al., 2021 ] Yaoxin Wu, Wen Song, Zhiguang Cao, Jie Zhang, and Andrew Lim. Learning improvement heuris- tics for solving routing problems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(9):5057– 5069,

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    DGL: Dynamic global-local in- formation aggregation for scalable vrp generalization with self-improvement learning

    [Xiaoet al., 2025 ] Yubin Xiao, Yuesong Wu, Rui Cao, Di Wang, Zhiguang Cao, Peng Zhao, Yuanshu Li, You Zhou, and Yuan Jiang. DGL: Dynamic global-local in- formation aggregation for scalable vrp generalization with self-improvement learning. InProceedings of Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Rethinking supervised learn- ing based neural combinatorial optimization for routing problem.ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization,

    [Yaoet al., 2024 ] Shunyu Yao, Xi Lin, Jiashu Wang, Qingfu Zhang, and Zhenkun Wang. Rethinking supervised learn- ing based neural combinatorial optimization for routing problem.ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization,

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    ViTSP: A vision language models guided frame- work for solving large-scale traveling salesman problems

    [Yinet al., 2026 ] Zhuoli Yin, Yi Ding, Reem Khir, and Hua Cai. ViTSP: A vision language models guided frame- work for solving large-scale traveling salesman problems. InThe Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Towards omni- generalizable neural methods for vehicle routing prob- lems

    [Zhouet al., 2023 ] Jianan Zhou, Yaoxin Wu, Wen Song, Zhiguang Cao, and Jie Zhang. Towards omni- generalizable neural methods for vehicle routing prob- lems. In40th International Conference on Machine Learn- ing,

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    /uni0000000b/uni00000044/uni0000000c /uni0000000b/uni00000045/uni0000000c Figure 3: TSP1000 instances with different distributions

    Second Residual ConnectionThe output of the FFN is added to its input through a second residual connection: Output=X ′ + FFN(X′) This output serves as the representation passed to the next decoder layer or used in the downstream prediction head. /uni0000000b/uni00000044/uni0000000c /uni0000000b/uni00000045/uni0000000c Figure 3: TSP1000 instances with diff...

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Selected node coordinates are transformed using the rotation matrix cos(φ)−sin(φ) sin(φ) cos(φ) with rotation angleφ∼[0,2π]

    Specifically, for rotation distribution, we mutate nodes by rotating a subset around the origin. Selected node coordinates are transformed using the rotation matrix cos(φ)−sin(φ) sin(φ) cos(φ) with rotation angleφ∼[0,2π]. For explosion distribution, we mutate uniformly distributed nodes by simulating a random explosion. We randomly se- lect an explosion c...

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Size (n) 100 200 500 1000 TSP w

    It can be observed that incor- porating different numbers of MnLP modules can improve /uni00000037/uni00000036/uni00000033/uni00000014/uni00000013/uni00000013/uni00000037/uni00000036/uni00000033/uni00000015/uni00000013/uni00000013/uni00000037/uni00000036/uni00000033/uni00000018/uni00000013/uni00000013/uni00000037/uni00000036/uni00000033/uni00000014/uni000...

    work page 2025