pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20688 · v1 · pith:KR4TBSIRnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-th

Fusion of Integrable Defects and the Defect g-Function

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords defect g-functionintegrable defectsdefect fusiontopological defectsIsing modelBethe-Yang equationsquantum field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exact defect g-functions determine how integrable line defects fuse in two-dimensional quantum field theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes exact defect g-functions for integrable line defects and uses them to derive rules for defect fusion in 2D quantum field theory. A sympathetic reader would care because these functions encode the localized contribution of defects to entropy and free energy, so their fusion behavior reveals how defects interact and affect physical observables. The work treats three cases: purely transmitting topological defects, non-topological defects that reflect and transmit, and the fusion of a defect with an integrable boundary. For topological defects the separated logarithmic g-function adds and fusion is controlled by multiplying transmission factors; non-topological cases produce oscillatory finite-size effects from separation phases, and the fused object is described by effective amplitudes. In the Ising examples, non-topological fusions lower the finite localized entropy contribution while topological defect-boundary fusions leave it unchanged.

Core claim

The paper establishes that defect g-functions provide an exact probe of fusion for integrable line defects. For purely transmitting topological defects the separated logarithmic g-function is additive and the fusion limit is fixed by the multiplicative composition of transmission factors. For defects with reflection and transmission, separation-dependent phases in the Bethe-Yang equations generate oscillatory finite-size corrections while the fused defect is captured by effective reflection and transmission amplitudes. In the Ising model examples, fusion involving non-topological defects reduces the finite localized contribution to the entropy, whereas topological defect-boundary fusion does

What carries the argument

The defect g-function, which quantifies the localized contribution of a line defect to the free energy or entropy and is computed exactly via integrability.

If this is right

  • Topological defect fusion is governed by multiplicative transmission factors while preserving additive g-function contributions.
  • Non-topological defect fusion produces effective reflection and transmission amplitudes for the combined object.
  • Fusion of non-topological defects with boundaries or each other reduces the finite localized entropy contribution in the Ising model.
  • Topological defect-boundary fusion leaves the localized entropy contribution unchanged.
  • Separation phases in non-topological cases lead to oscillatory corrections in finite-size spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same g-function approach could be applied to other integrable models to extract universal fusion rules beyond the Ising case.
  • The additive property for separated topological defects may connect to underlying conservation laws or topological invariants in the theory.
  • These fusion rules suggest a way to build larger defect networks whose entropy contributions can be predicted without solving the full multi-defect system.

Load-bearing premise

The line defects are integrable, which permits exact solutions via Bethe-Yang equations and direct computation of the g-functions.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation or exact diagonalization of the Ising model with fused non-topological defects that fails to show a lowered localized entropy contribution compared with the unfused case would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

We study exact defect $g$-functions for integrable line defects in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory and use them to probe defect fusion. We consider three settings: fusion of purely transmitting topological defects, fusion of non-topological defects with reflection and transmission, and fusion of a defect with an integrable boundary. For topological defects, the separated logarithmic $g$-function is additive, and the fusion limit is controlled by the multiplicative composition of transmission factors. For non-topological defects, separation-dependent phases in the Bethe-Yang equations produce oscillatory finite-size effects, while the fused defect is described by effective reflection and transmission amplitudes. In the Ising examples studied here, fusion involving non-topological defects lowers the finite localized contribution to the entropy, whereas topological defect-boundary fusion leaves it unchanged.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines exact defect g-functions for integrable line defects in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory, using them to analyze defect fusion in three settings: fusion of purely transmitting topological defects, fusion of non-topological defects with reflection and transmission, and fusion of a defect with an integrable boundary. For topological defects the separated logarithmic g-function is additive and the fusion limit is governed by the multiplicative composition of transmission factors. Non-topological defects produce separation-dependent phases in the Bethe-Yang equations that generate oscillatory finite-size effects, while the fused defect is characterized by effective reflection and transmission amplitudes. In the Ising-model examples, fusion involving non-topological defects reduces the finite localized contribution to the entropy, whereas topological defect-boundary fusion leaves this contribution unchanged.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a systematic, exact framework for defect fusion that extends standard integrability methods (Bethe-Yang equations and closed-form g-functions) to line defects. The additivity result for topological defects and the concrete entropy shifts reported for Ising defects constitute falsifiable predictions that can be checked against other integrable models or lattice realizations. The manuscript correctly credits the use of known scattering data for Ising defects and avoids ad-hoc parameters.

minor comments (3)
  1. §4 (Ising examples): the numerical values of the finite localized entropy contributions before and after fusion are stated but not accompanied by error estimates or a comparison with the continuum limit; adding a short table or explicit error analysis would strengthen the claim that the reduction is a genuine physical effect rather than a finite-size artifact.
  2. Notation: the distinction between the 'separated logarithmic g-function' and the ordinary defect g-function is introduced in the abstract and §2 but is not given a compact symbol or equation reference; a single displayed equation defining g_sep would improve readability.
  3. References: the manuscript cites the original works on Ising defect scattering amplitudes but omits a brief comparison with recent results on defect fusion in the literature on boundary CFT; adding one or two sentences in the introduction would clarify the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our manuscript on exact defect g-functions and their application to fusion in integrable 2D QFT. We appreciate the recognition that the additivity result for topological defects and the entropy shifts in the Ising examples constitute falsifiable predictions, and that the work correctly builds on known scattering data without ad-hoc parameters. The recommendation for minor revision is noted; we will incorporate improvements to clarity and presentation in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard integrability techniques

full rationale

The paper applies established methods from integrable QFT, including Bethe-Yang equations for finite-size effects and exact g-function expressions derived from reflection/transmission amplitudes, to known Ising defect data. Additivity of the separated logarithmic g-function for topological defects follows directly from multiplicative transmission factors in the fusion limit, without reducing to self-definition or fitted inputs. No load-bearing steps invoke self-citations as unverified uniqueness theorems or smuggle ansatze; results are self-contained against external literature benchmarks on integrable defects and boundaries.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the domain assumption of integrability in 2D QFT and the existence of exact g-functions and Bethe-Yang equations for the defects considered.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The line defects are integrable, permitting exact g-function computations and Bethe-Yang analysis.
    Stated implicitly throughout the abstract as the basis for studying fusion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5657 in / 1218 out tokens · 33843 ms · 2026-05-21T04:28:21.349218+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 61 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kondo,Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Alloys,Prog

    J. Kondo,Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Alloys,Prog. Theor. Phys.32(1964) 37. – 44 –

  2. [2]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

  3. [3]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, JHEP03(2018) 189 [1704.02330]

  4. [4]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin,Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,JHEP01(2019) 026 [1802.04445]

  5. [5]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: Partition functions

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353 [hep-th/0204148]

  6. [6]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators II: Unoriented world sheets

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 2. Unoriented world sheets,Nucl. Phys. B678(2004) 511 [hep-th/0306164]

  7. [7]

    Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B763(2007) 354 [hep-th/0607247]

  8. [8]

    Topological defects for the free boson CFT

    J. Fuchs, M.R. Gaberdiel, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,Topological defects for the free boson CFT,J. Phys. A40(2007) 11403 [0705.3129]

  9. [9]

    Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory

    M. Buican and A. Gromov,Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.356(2017) 1017 [1701.02800]

  10. [10]

    Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications

    N. Andrei et al.,Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications,J. Phys. A53 (2020) 453002 [1810.05697]

  11. [11]

    Vanhove, L

    R. Vanhove, L. Lootens, H.-H. Tu and F. Verstraete,Topological aspects of the critical three-state Potts model,J. Phys. A55(2022) 235002 [2107.11177]

  12. [12]

    Northe,Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT, J

    C. Northe,Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT, J. Phys. A58(2025) 103001 [2411.03381]

  13. [13]

    Lattice Topological Defects in Non-Unitary Conformal Field Theories

    M. Sinha, T.S. Tavares, H. Saleur and A. Roy,Lattice Topological Defects in Non-Unitary Conformal Field Theories,2604.25999

  14. [14]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model

    D. Aasen, R.S.K. Mong and P. Fendley,Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,J. Phys. A49(2016) 354001 [1601.07185]

  15. [15]

    Zamolodchikov,Integrable field theory from conformal field theory,Adv

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable field theory from conformal field theory,Adv. Stud. Pure Math.19(1989) 641

  16. [16]

    Integrable Structure of Conformal Field Theory, Quantum KdV Theory and Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz

    V.V. Bazhanov, S.L. Lukyanov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable structure of conformal field theory, quantum KdV theory and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,Commun. Math. Phys. 177(1996) 381 [hep-th/9412229]

  17. [17]

    Integrable Quantum Field Theories in Finite Volume: Excited State Energies

    V.V. Bazhanov, S.L. Lukyanov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable quantum field theories in finite volume: Excited state energies,Nucl. Phys. B489(1997) 487 [hep-th/9607099]

  18. [18]

    Non-local conserved charges from defects in perturbed conformal field theory

    I. Runkel,Non-local conserved charges from defects in perturbed conformal field theory,J. Phys. A43(2010) 365206 [1004.1909]

  19. [19]

    Defect scaling Lee-Yang model from the perturbed DCFT point of view

    Z. Bajnok, L. Holló and G. Watts,Defect scaling Lee–Yang model from the perturbed DCFT point of view,Nucl. Phys. B886(2014) 93 [1307.4536]

  20. [20]

    On the parafermionic scattering of an integrable Heisenberg model with impurity

    M.J. Martins,On the parafermionic scattering of an integrable Heisenberg model with impurity,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 661 [cond-mat/9402083]

  21. [21]

    From integrability to conductance, impurity systems

    O. Castro-Alvaredo and A. Fring,From integrability to conductance, impurity systems,Nucl. Phys. B649(2003) 449 [hep-th/0205076]. – 45 –

  22. [22]

    From Defects to Boundaries

    Z. Bajnok and A. George,From defects to boundaries,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A21(2006) 1063 [hep-th/0404199]

  23. [23]

    Solving topological defects via fusion

    Z. Bajnok and Z. Simon,Solving topological defects via fusion,Nucl. Phys. B802(2008) 307 [0712.4292]

  24. [24]

    On O(1) contributions to the free energy in Bethe Ansatz systems: the exact g-function

    B. Pozsgay,On O(1) contributions to the free energy in Bethe Ansatz systems: The Exact g-function,JHEP08(2010) 090 [1003.5542]

  25. [25]

    Form factors in the presence of integrable defects

    Z. Bajnok and O. el Deeb,Form factors in the presence of integrable defects,Nucl. Phys. B 832(2010) 500 [0909.3200]

  26. [26]

    Statistical Models with a Line of Defect

    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti,Statistical models with a line of defect,Phys. Lett. B328(1994) 123 [hep-th/9403049]

  27. [27]

    Scattering Theory and Correlation Functions in Statistical Models with a Line of Defect

    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti,Scattering theory and correlation functions in statistical models with a line of defect,Nucl. Phys. B432(1994) 518 [hep-th/9409076]

  28. [28]

    Entanglement Entropy in Integrable Field Theories with Line Defects I. Topological Defect

    Y. Jiang,Entanglement entropy in integrable field theories with line defects. Part I. Topological defect,JHEP07(2017) 127 [1703.03562]

  29. [29]

    Entanglement Entropy in Integrable Field Theories with Line Defects II. Non-topological Defect

    Y. Jiang,Entanglement Entropy in Integrable Field Theories with Line Defects II. Non-topological Defect,JHEP08(2017) 013 [1703.04458]

  30. [30]

    Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory, Nucl

    E.P. Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360

  31. [31]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    S. Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept. 1063(2024) 1 [2305.18296]

  32. [32]

    McGreevy, Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, arXiv:2204.03045

    J. McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57 [2204.03045]

  33. [33]

    S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry, 8, 2023 [2308.00747]

  34. [34]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases,JHEP04(2024) 132 [1912.02817]

  35. [35]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D.S.W. Gould, A. Platschorre et al.,Lectures on generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1 [2307.07547]

  36. [36]

    Roumpedakis, S

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,Commun. Math. Phys.401(2023) 3043 [2204.02407]

  37. [37]

    Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond

    C. Cordova, T.T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator and S.-H. Shao,Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond, inSnowmass 2021, 5, 2022 [2205.09545]

  38. [38]

    Choi, H.T

    Y. Choi, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 161601 [2205.05086]

  39. [39]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,JHEP07(2024) 051 [2106.12577]

  40. [40]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023) 489 [2204.09025]. – 46 –

  41. [41]

    Fusion of conformal interfaces

    C. Bachas and I. Brunner,Fusion of conformal interfaces,JHEP02(2008) 085 [0712.0076]

  42. [42]

    Fusion of Critical Defect Lines in the 2D Ising Model

    C. Bachas, I. Brunner and D. Roggenkamp,Fusion of Critical Defect Lines in the 2D Ising Model,J. Stat. Mech.1308(2013) P08008 [1303.3616]

  43. [43]

    Purely Transmitting Defect Field Theories

    R. Konik and A. LeClair,Purely transmitting defect field theories,Nucl. Phys. B538(1999) 587 [hep-th/9703085]

  44. [44]

    Classically integrable field theories with defects

    P. Bowcock, E. Corrigan and C. Zambon,Classically integrable field theories with defects, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19(2004) 82 [hep-th/0305022]

  45. [45]

    Affleck and A.W.W

    I. Affleck and A.W.W. Ludwig,Universal noninteger ’ground state degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 161

  46. [46]

    Boundary conformal field theory approach to the two-dimensional critical Ising model with a defect line

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck,Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line,Nucl. Phys. B495(1997) 533 [cond-mat/9612187]

  47. [47]

    Reflection and Transmission for Conformal Defects

    T. Quella, I. Runkel and G.M.T. Watts,Reflection and transmission for conformal defects, JHEP04(2007) 095 [hep-th/0611296]

  48. [48]

    Defect Lines in the Ising Model and Boundary States on Orbifolds

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck,Defect lines in the Ising model and boundary states on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2604 [hep-th/9606177]

  49. [49]

    Loop Operators and the Kondo Problem

    C. Bachas and M. Gaberdiel,Loop operators and the Kondo problem,JHEP11(2004) 065 [hep-th/0411067]

  50. [50]

    Generalised twisted partition functions

    V.B. Petkova and J.B. Zuber,Generalized twisted partition functions,Phys. Lett. B504 (2001) 157 [hep-th/0011021]

  51. [51]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York (1997), 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

  52. [52]

    Ambrosino, I

    F. Ambrosino, I. Runkel and G.M.T. Watts,Non-local charges from perturbed defects via SymTFT in 2d CFT,J. Phys. A58(2025) 425401 [2504.05277]

  53. [53]

    Dotsenko and V.A

    V.S. Dotsenko and V.A. Fateev,Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge c<1,Nucl. Phys. B251(1985) 691

  54. [54]

    Boundary structure constants for the A-series Virasoro minimal models

    I. Runkel,Boundary structure constants for the A series Virasoro minimal models,Nucl. Phys. B549(1999) 563 [hep-th/9811178]

  55. [55]

    Permeable conformal walls and holography

    C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf and H. Ooguri,Permeable conformal walls and holography,JHEP06(2002) 027 [hep-th/0111210]

  56. [56]

    Defect flows in minimal models

    M. Kormos, I. Runkel and G.M.T. Watts,Defect flows in minimal models,JHEP11(2009) 057 [0907.1497]

  57. [57]

    Entropy of conformal perturbation defects

    A. Konechny and C. Schmidt-Colinet,Entropy of conformal perturbation defects,J. Phys. A 47(2014) 485401 [1407.6444]

  58. [58]

    Reflection and transmission of conformal perturbation defects

    I. Brunner and C. Schmidt-Colinet,Reflection and transmission of conformal perturbation defects,J. Phys. A49(2016) 195401 [1508.04350]

  59. [59]

    Perturbed Defects and T-Systems in Conformal Field Theory

    I. Runkel,Perturbed Defects and T-Systems in Conformal Field Theory,J. Phys. A41 (2008) 105401 [0711.0102]

  60. [60]

    A Monoidal Category for Perturbed Defects in Conformal Field Theory

    D. Manolopoulos and I. Runkel,A Monoidal Category for Perturbed Defects in Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.295(2010) 327 [0904.1122]. – 47 –

  61. [61]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators IV: Structure constants and correlation functions

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators IV: Structure constants and correlation functions,Nucl. Phys. B715(2005) 539 [hep-th/0412290]

  62. [62]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,FactorizedS-Matrices in Two-Dimensions as the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Models,Annals Phys.120(1979) 253

  63. [63]

    On the absence of simultaneous reflection and transmission in integrable impurity systems

    O.A. Castro-Alvaredo, A. Fring and F. Gohmann,On the absence of simultaneous reflection and transmission in integrable impurity systems,hep-th/0201142

  64. [64]

    Cherednik,Factorizing Particles on a Half Line and Root Systems,Theor

    I.V. Cherednik,Factorizing Particles on a Half Line and Root Systems,Theor. Math. Phys. 61(1984) 977

  65. [65]

    Sklyanin,Boundary Conditions for Integrable Quantum Systems,J

    E.K. Sklyanin,Boundary Conditions for Integrable Quantum Systems,J. Phys. A21(1988) 2375

  66. [66]

    Factorized Scattering in the Presence of Reflecting Boundaries

    A. Fring and R. Koberle,Factorized scattering in the presence of reflecting boundaries,Nucl. Phys. B421(1994) 159 [hep-th/9304141]

  67. [67]

    Algebraic Structures Related to Reflection Equations

    P.P. Kulish and E.K. Sklyanin,Algebraic structures related to the reflection equations,J. Phys. A25(1992) 5963 [hep-th/9209054]

  68. [68]

    Yang and C.P

    C.N. Yang and C.P. Yang,Ground-state energy of a heisenberg-ising lattice,Phys. Rev.147 (1966) 303

  69. [69]

    Yang and C.P

    C.-N. Yang and C.P. Yang,Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional System of Bosons with Repulsive Delta Function Interaction,J. Math. Phys.10(1969) 1115

  70. [70]

    Zamolodchikov,Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz in relativistic models: Scaling 3-state potts and Lee-Yang models,Nucl

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz in relativistic models: Scaling 3-state potts and Lee-Yang models,Nucl. Phys. B342(1990) 695

  71. [71]

    The Scattering Theory of Oscillator Defects in an Optical Fiber

    R. Konik and A. LeClair,The Scattering theory of oscillator defects in an optical fiber,Phys. Rev. B58(1998) 1872 [hep-th/9701016]

  72. [72]

    Boundary S-Matrix and Boundary State in Two-Dimensional Integrable Quantum Field Theory

    S. Ghoshal and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 3841 [hep-th/9306002]

  73. [73]

    Boundary energy and boundary states in integrable quantum field theories

    A. LeClair, G. Mussardo, H. Saleur and S. Skorik,Boundary energy and boundary states in integrable quantum field theories,Nucl. Phys. B453(1995) 581 [hep-th/9503227]

  74. [74]

    Integrable quantum field theory with boundaries: the exact g-function

    P. Dorey, D. Fioravanti, C. Rim and R. Tateo,Integrable quantum field theory with boundaries: The Exact g function,Nucl. Phys. B696(2004) 445 [hep-th/0404014]

  75. [75]

    O(1) contribution of saddle point fluctuations to the free energy of Bethe Ansatz systems

    F. Woynarovich,O(1) contribution of saddle point fluctuations to the free energy of Bethe Ansatz systems,Nucl. Phys. B700(2004) 331 [cond-mat/0402129]

  76. [76]

    Zamolodchikov,Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions,Int

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10(1995) 1125

  77. [77]

    Boundary Entropy Can Increase Under Bulk RG Flow

    D.R. Green, M. Mulligan and D. Starr,Boundary Entropy Can Increase Under Bulk RG Flow,Nucl. Phys. B798(2008) 491 [0710.4348]

  78. [78]

    He and Y

    Y.-J. He and Y. Jiang,Exact g-function without strings,2412.12869

  79. [79]

    On the Boundary Entropy of One-dimensional Quantum Systems at Low Temperature

    D. Friedan and A. Konechny,On the boundary entropy of one-dimensional quantum systems at low temperature,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 030402 [hep-th/0312197]

  80. [80]

    The g-theorem and quantum information theory

    H. Casini, I. Salazar Landea and G. Torroba,The g-theorem and quantum information theory,JHEP10(2016) 140 [1607.00390]. – 48 –

Showing first 80 references.