pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2305.18296 · v2 · submitted 2023-05-29 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-ph· math.CT

Recognition: no theorem link

ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-phmath.CT
keywords non-invertible symmetriesgeneralized symmetriestopological defectstheta defectsSymTFTgauginghigher-form symmetriesTQFT
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-invertible symmetries arise when a quantum field theory is stacked with topological QFTs and a diagonal symmetry is gauged, producing topological defects without inverses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explains how global symmetries in QFTs have been generalized to include higher-form, higher-group, and non-invertible symmetries, all identified with topological defects. The core construction for many non-invertible symmetries involves stacking the original theory with TQFTs and gauging a shared non-anomalous symmetry, after which the TQFTs manifest as (twisted) theta defects. These defects include condensation defects and self-duality defects, and appear in gauge theories with disconnected groups. The lectures also cover how such symmetries act on extended operators through higher-representations rather than ordinary group representations. Finally, the Symmetry Topological Field Theory is introduced as a tool to organize symmetries, their gauging, and the associated charges.

Core claim

The foundational construction for non-invertible symmetries is the stacking of a QFT with topological QFTs followed by gauging a diagonal non-anomalous global symmetry; the TQFTs then become topological defects in the resulting theory known as (twisted) theta defects, which encompass condensation defects, self-duality defects, and non-invertible symmetries in gauge theories with disconnected gauge groups.

What carries the argument

The stacking-and-gauging procedure that converts TQFTs into (twisted) theta defects serving as non-invertible symmetry generators.

Load-bearing premise

Symmetries correspond to topological defects in a general QFT, and this identification continues to hold when the defects are non-invertible.

What would settle it

A calculation in a specific gauge theory showing that the predicted theta defect does not commute with all local operators in the expected way or fails to satisfy the fusion rules derived from the construction.

read the original abstract

What comprises a global symmetry of a Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has been vastly expanded in the past 10 years to include not only symmetries acting on higher-dimensional defects, but also most recently symmetries which do not have an inverse. The principle that enables this generalization is the identification of symmetries with topological defects in the QFT. In these lectures, we provide an introduction to generalized symmetries, with a focus on non-invertible symmetries. We begin with a brief overview of invertible generalized symmetries, including higher-form and higher-group symmetries, and then move on to non-invertible symmetries. The main idea that underlies many constructions of non-invertible symmetries is that of stacking a QFT with topological QFTs (TQFTs) and then gauging a diagonal non-anomalous global symmetry. The TQFTs become topological defects in the gauged theory called (twisted) theta defects and comprise a large class of non-invertible symmetries including condensation defects, self-duality defects, and non-invertible symmetries of gauge theories with disconnected gauge groups. We will explain the general principle and provide numerous concrete examples. Following this extensive characterization of symmetry generators, we then discuss their action on higher-charges, i.e. extended physical operators. As we will explain, even for invertible higher-form symmetries these are not only representations of the $p$-form symmetry group, but more generally what are called higher-representations. Finally, we give an introduction to the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) and its utility in characterizing symmetries, their gauging and generalized charges. Lectures prepared for the ICTP Trieste Spring School, April 2023.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript consists of lecture notes introducing generalized symmetries in QFT, beginning with invertible higher-form and higher-group symmetries before focusing on non-invertible symmetries. The central construction is the stacking of a QFT with suitable TQFTs followed by gauging a diagonal non-anomalous symmetry, which produces topological defects (twisted theta defects) that realize condensation defects, self-duality defects, and non-invertible symmetries of gauge theories with disconnected groups. The notes then address the action of these symmetries on extended operators (via higher representations) and introduce the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) as a tool for characterizing symmetries, gauging, and charges. Numerous concrete examples are provided throughout.

Significance. These lectures consolidate recent developments in generalized symmetries into a coherent pedagogical framework. The stacking-plus-gauging mechanism is presented as a unifying principle supported by established literature, with explicit examples that illustrate fusion rules and defect actions. The inclusion of higher representations and the SymTFT perspective adds practical value for computing charges and gauging procedures. If the explanations are accurate, the notes would serve as a useful reference for researchers entering the field and for teaching advanced topics in hep-th.

minor comments (2)
  1. In the section introducing the SymTFT, the relation between the SymTFT and the original QFT's symmetry data could be made more explicit by adding a short diagram or table that maps SymTFT operators to the corresponding defects and charges in the physical theory.
  2. The discussion of higher representations for invertible higher-form symmetries (around the transition from invertible to non-invertible cases) would benefit from one additional low-dimensional example (e.g., 1-form symmetry in 4d) to illustrate the distinction between ordinary representations and higher representations before moving to the non-invertible setting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the lecture notes and for recommending acceptance. We appreciate the recognition that the stacking-plus-gauging construction provides a unifying pedagogical framework, supported by concrete examples, and that the inclusion of higher representations and the SymTFT perspective adds practical value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard literature review of stacking-gauging constructions

full rationale

The lectures present the stacking-plus-gauging construction for non-invertible symmetries as a standard procedure drawn from prior literature, with the identification of symmetries as topological defects treated as an established starting point rather than a novel derivation internal to the notes. No equations or claims reduce by construction to parameters or definitions fitted within the paper itself; all central steps reference external results and concrete examples from established cases. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The lectures rest on standard QFT assumptions and the recent identification of symmetries with topological defects; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Symmetries in QFT can be identified with topological defects
    This is the central principle stated in the abstract that enables the generalization to non-invertible symmetries.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5610 in / 1195 out tokens · 33847 ms · 2026-05-16T07:46:43.873408+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lattice Realizations of Flat Gauging and T-duality Defects at Any Radius

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Modified Villain lattice realizations of flat-gauged interfaces and T-duality defects in the 2D compact boson are constructed at arbitrary radii, yielding non-compact edge modes with continuous spectrum and infinite q...

  2. Non-Invertible Symmetries on Tensor-Product Hilbert Spaces and Quantum Cellular Automata

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Any weakly integral fusion category admits a QCA-refined realization on tensor-product Hilbert spaces with QCA and symmetry indices fixed by the categorical data under defect assumptions.

  3. A Twist on Scattering from Defect Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect 't Hooft anomalies trap charges at symmetry-line junctions and thereby drive categorical scattering into twist operators.

  4. Anomalies in Neural Network Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives Schwinger-Dyson equations and Ward identities in NN-FT to study anomalies in QFTs via a conserved parameter-space current, yielding a new perspective on symmetries.

  5. Sharpened Dynamical Cobordism

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Sharpened Dynamical Cobordism ties the allowed range of critical exponent δ to theory structure ξ, flagging obstructions from non-trivial cobordism charges that require new degrees of freedom.

  6. From Baby Universes to Narain Moduli: Topological Boundary Averaging in SymTFTs

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography is reinterpreted as averaging over topological boundary conditions in a fixed SymTFT slab, reproducing Poisson moments in the Marolf-Maxfield model and Zamolodchikov me...

  7. Half-Spacetime Gauging of 2-Group Symmetry in 3d

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Half-spacetime gauging of 2-group symmetries in (2+1)d QFTs produces non-invertible duality defects whose fusion rules are derived explicitly from parent theories with mixed anomalies.

  8. SymTFT in Superspace

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A supersymmetric SymTFT (SuSymTFT) is constructed as a super-BF theory on (n|m)-dimensional supermanifolds and verified for compact and chiral super-bosons in two dimensions.

  9. Hilbert Space Fragmentation from Generalized Symmetries

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalized symmetries generate exponentially many Krylov sectors in quantum many-body systems, showing that Hilbert space fragmentation does not by itself imply ergodicity breaking.

  10. A General Prescription for Spurion Analysis of Non-Invertible Selection Rules

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A general prescription is formulated for spurion analysis of commutative non-invertible fusion algebras in particle physics, unifying prior specific cases and enabling systematic tracking of coupling constants in tree...

  11. Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A bosonic lattice model realizes exact chiral symmetry and its anomaly in 3+1d, with the continuum limit a compact boson theory with axion-like coupling.

  12. On Lagrangians of Non-abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten Theories

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A gauging method from abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten theories yields BF-type Lagrangians for non-abelian cases via local-coefficient cohomologies and homotopy analysis.

  13. Generalized Families of QFTs

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalized family anomalies for broken higher-group and non-invertible symmetries constrain RG flows and IR phases of QFT families, with explicit application to deformed 4d QCD.

  14. The Line, the Strip and the Duality Defect

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Condensation defects in SymTFT descriptions of XY-plaquette and XYZ-cube models realize non-invertible self-duality symmetries at any coupling, with a continuous SO(2) version in the XY-plaquette.

  15. de Sitter Vacua & pUniverses

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The p-Schwinger model on de Sitter space supports p distinct de Sitter-invariant vacua that are Hadamard, and coupling a multi-flavor version to gravity yields a semiclassical de Sitter saddle at large N_f.

  16. Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The symmetry category of a 2D QFT with G-symmetry and anomaly k equals the twisted Hilbert space category Hilb^k(G), whose Drinfeld center is the twisted representation category of the conjugation groupoid C*-algebra,...

  17. Candidate Gaugings of Categorical Continuous Symmetry

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Candidate modular invariants and gaugings for continuous G-symmetries with anomaly k are obtained from +1 eigenspaces of semiclassical modular kernels in a BF+kCS SymTFT model.

  18. Lattice Topological Defects in Non-Unitary Conformal Field Theories

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lattice realizations of topological defects in non-unitary 2D CFTs are built from modified RSOS models, yielding numerical results that match analytical predictions for spectra and RG flows.

  19. Monodromy Defects for Electric-Magnetic Duality, Hyperbolic Space, and Lines

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Monodromy defects in Maxwell theory are analyzed via mapping to hyperbolic space, recovering the defect primary spectrum and showing that Wilson/'t Hooft lines terminate on defects, become decomposable, and follow Che...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 161 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

  2. [2]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, vol. 205 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/205

  3. [3]

    Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 070601, arXiv:cond-mat/0404051. 89

  4. [4]

    Topological defects for the free boson CFT

    J. Fuchs, M. R. Gaberdiel, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “Topological defects for the free boson CFT,” J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 11403, arXiv:0705.3129 [hep-th]

  5. [5]

    Defect lines, dualities, and generalised orbifolds,

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “Defect lines, dualities, and generalised orbifolds,” in 16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics . 9,

  6. [6]

    arXiv:0909.5013 [math-ph]

  7. [7]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,” JHEP 03 (2018) 189, arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

  8. [8]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,” JHEP 01 (2019) 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

  9. [9]

    Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases,

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, “Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases,” arXiv:1912.02817 [hep-th]

  10. [10]

    Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2,

    Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis, and S. Seifnashri, “Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2,” JHEP 03 (2021) 103, arXiv:2008.07567 [hep-th]

  11. [11]

    Fusion Category Symmetry II: Categoriosities at c = 1 and Beyond,

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, “Fusion Category Symmetry II: Categoriosities at c = 1 and Beyond,” arXiv:2106.12577 [hep-th]

  12. [12]

    Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,

    E. Witten, “Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,” Phys. Lett. B 86 (1979) 283–287

  13. [13]

    Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, “Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,” JHEP 09 (2021) 203, arXiv:2104.07036 [hep-th]

  14. [14]

    Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 11, (2022) 111601, arXiv:2111.01141 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) 125016, arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

  16. [16]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,” arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th] . 90

  17. [17]

    Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 1, (2023) 007, arXiv:2204.06564 [hep-th]

  18. [18]

    Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,” arXiv:2204.09025 [hep-th]

  19. [19]

    Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, “Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 1, (2023) 011034, arXiv:2205.06243 [hep-th]

  20. [20]

    Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 16, (2022) 161601, arXiv:2205.05086 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification,

    J. Kaidi, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification,” JHEP 08 (2022) 053, arXiv:2205.01104 [hep-th]

  22. [22]

    On continuous 2-category symmetries and Yang-Mills theory,

    A. Antinucci, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “On continuous 2-category symmetries and Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 12 (2022) 061, arXiv:2206.05646 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    On the 6d Origin of Non-invertible Symmetries in 4d,

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, and A. Hasan, “On the 6d Origin of Non-invertible Symmetries in 4d,” arXiv:2206.07073 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    Non-Invertible Defects in 5d, Boundaries and Holography,

    J. A. Damia, R. Argurio, and E. Garcia-Valdecasas, “Non-Invertible Defects in 5d, Boundaries and Holography,” SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 067, arXiv:2207.02831 [hep-th]

  25. [25]

    Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 13, (2023) 131602, arXiv:2208.04331 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and J. Wu, “Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 no. 11, (2022) 2200143, arXiv:2208.05973 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, and J. Pearson, “Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I,” arXiv:2208.05993 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    Continuous Generalized Symmetries in Three Dimensions,

    J. A. Damia, R. Argurio, and L. Tizzano, “Continuous Generalized Symmetries in Three Dimensions,” arXiv:2206.14093 [hep-th] . 91

  29. [29]

    Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,

    F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 12, (2023) 121601, arXiv:2208.07373 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    Decomposition, Condensation Defects, and Fusion,

    L. Lin, D. G. Robbins, and E. Sharpe, “Decomposition, Condensation Defects, and Fusion,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 no. 11, (2022) 2200130, arXiv:2208.05982 [hep-th]

  31. [31]

    Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    I. n. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, “Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 no. 11, (2022) 2200154, arXiv:2208.07508 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators,

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, and H. Y. Zhang, “The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators,” Fortsch. Phys. 71 no. 1, (2023) 2200180, arXiv:2209.03343 [hep-th]

  33. [33]

    Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories,

    P. Niro, K. Roumpedakis, and O. Sela, “Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories,” JHEP 03 (2023) 005, arXiv:2209.11166 [hep-th]

  34. [34]

    Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,” arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,” arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Solitonic symmetry beyond homotopy: invertibility from bordism and non-invertibility from TQFT,

    S. Chen and Y. Tanizaki, “Solitonic symmetry beyond homotopy: invertibility from bordism and non-invertibility from TQFT,” arXiv:2210.13780 [hep-th]

  37. [37]

    Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri, and Y. Tachikawa, “Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,” JHEP 03 (2023) 094, arXiv:2208.05495 [hep-th]

  38. [38]

    Non-invertible Symmetries of Class S Theories,

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan, and J. Kaidi, “Non-invertible Symmetries of Class S Theories,” arXiv:2211.05138 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED,

    A. Karasik, “On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED,” arXiv:2211.05802 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    Neutrino Masses from Generalized Symmetry Breaking,

    C. Cordova, S. Hong, S. Koren, and K. Ohmori, “Neutrino Masses from Generalized Symmetry Breaking,” arXiv:2211.07639 [hep-ph]

  41. [41]

    A Goldstone theorem for continuous non-invertible symmetries,

    I. n. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria and N. Iqbal, “A Goldstone theorem for continuous non-invertible symmetries,” arXiv:2211.09570 [hep-th] . 92

  42. [42]

    Gauging noninvertible defects: a 2-categorical perspective,

    T. D. D´ ecoppet and M. Yu, “Gauging noninvertible defects: a 2-categorical perspective,” Lett. Math. Phys. 113 no. 2, (2023) 36, arXiv:2211.08436 [math.CT]

  43. [43]

    Topological Holography: Towards a Unification of Landau and Beyond-Landau Physics,

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian, and A. Tiwari, “Topological Holography: Towards a Unification of Landau and Beyond-Landau Physics,” arXiv:2207.10712 [cond-mat.str-el]

  44. [44]

    Parity and Spin CFT with boundaries and defects,

    I. Runkel, L. Szegedy, and G. M. T. Watts, “Parity and Spin CFT with boundaries and defects,” arXiv:2210.01057 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    Non-invertible Gauss Law and Axions,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non-invertible Gauss Law and Axions,” arXiv:2212.04499 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    Unifying Constructions of Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Unifying Constructions of Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2212.06159 [hep-th]

  47. [47]

    Non-Invertible Symmetry Webs,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Non-Invertible Symmetry Webs,” arXiv:2212.06842 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, and J. Pearson, “Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II,” arXiv:2212.07393 [hep-th]

  49. [49]

    Top Down Approach to Topological Duality Defects,

    J. J. Heckman, M. Hubner, E. Torres, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “Top Down Approach to Topological Duality Defects,” arXiv:2212.09743 [hep-th]

  50. [50]

    ”Zoology

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “”Zoology” of non-invertible duality defects: the view from class S,” arXiv:2212.09549 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    A. Apte, C. Cordova, and H. T. Lam, “Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2212.14605 [hep-th]

  52. [52]

    Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems,

    C. Delcamp and A. Tiwari, “Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems,” arXiv:2301.01259 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    Kaidi, E

    J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2301.07112 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    Non-Invertible Duality Transformation Between SPT and SSB Phases,

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, “Non-Invertible Duality Transformation Between SPT and SSB Phases,” arXiv:2301.07899 [cond-mat.str-el]

  55. [55]

    Coupling a Cosmic String to a TQFT,

    T. D. Brennan, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, “Coupling a Cosmic String to a TQFT,” arXiv:2302.00777 [hep-ph] . 93

  56. [56]

    Branes and symmetries for N = 3 S-folds,

    M. Etheredge, I. Garcia Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich, and S. Rauch, “Branes and symmetries for N = 3 S-folds,” arXiv:2302.14068 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    Bootstrapping Non-invertible Symmetries,

    Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, “Bootstrapping Non-invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2302.13900 [hep-th]

  58. [58]

    Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly,

    P. Putrov and J. Wang, “Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly,” arXiv:2302.14862 [hep-th]

  59. [59]

    Comments on Non-invertible Symmetries in Argyres-Douglas Theories,

    F. Carta, S. Giacomelli, N. Mekareeya, and A. Mininno, “Comments on Non-invertible Symmetries in Argyres-Douglas Theories,” arXiv:2303.16216 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Non-invertible symmetries and boundaries in four dimensions,

    M. Koide, Y. Nagoya, and S. Yamaguchi, “Non-invertible symmetries and boundaries in four dimensions,” arXiv:2304.01550 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Anomalies of (1 + 1)D categorical symmetries,

    C. Zhang and C. C´ ordova, “Anomalies of (1 + 1)D categorical symmetries,” arXiv:2304.01262 [cond-mat.str-el]

  62. [62]

    Subsystem Non-Invertible Symmetry Operators and Defects,

    W. Cao, L. Li, M. Yamazaki, and Y. Zheng, “Subsystem Non-Invertible Symmetry Operators and Defects,” arXiv:2304.09886 [cond-mat.str-el]

  63. [63]

    R7-Branes as Charge Conjugation Operators,

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, “R7-Branes as Charge Conjugation Operators,” arXiv:2305.05689 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    Fusion Surface Models: 2+1d Lattice Models from Fusion 2-Categories,

    K. Inamura and K. Ohmori, “Fusion Surface Models: 2+1d Lattice Models from Fusion 2-Categories,” arXiv:2305.05774 [cond-mat.str-el]

  65. [65]

    SymTFTs and Duality Defects from 6d SCFTs on 4-manifolds,

    J. Chen, W. Cui, B. Haghighat, and Y.-N. Wang, “SymTFTs and Duality Defects from 6d SCFTs on 4-manifolds,” arXiv:2305.09734 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    Four-manifolds and Symmetry Categories of 2d CFTs,

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, and A. Hasan, “Four-manifolds and Symmetry Categories of 2d CFTs,” arXiv:2305.10422 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Comments on Boundaries, Anomalies, and Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, Y. Sanghavi, and S.-H. Shao, “Comments on Boundaries, Anomalies, and Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2305.09713 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    Condensations in higher categories,

    D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, “Condensations in higher categories,” arXiv:1905.09566 [math.CT]

  69. [69]

    Fusion 2-categories and a state-sum invariant for 4-manifolds

    C. L. Douglas and D. J. Reutter, “Fusion 2-categories and a state-sum invariant for 4-manifolds,” arXiv:1812.11933. 94

  70. [70]

    Hatcher, Algebraic topology

    A. Hatcher, Algebraic topology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000. https://cds.cern.ch/record/478079

  71. [71]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,” JHEP 04 (2014) 001, arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th]

  72. [72]

    On 2-Group Global Symmetries and Their Anomalies

    F. Benini, C. C´ ordova, and P.-S. Hsin, “On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies,” JHEP 03 (2019) 118, arXiv:1803.09336 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies,

    P.-S. Hsin and H. T. Lam, “Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies,” SciPost Phys. 10 no. 2, (2021) 032, arXiv:2007.05915 [hep-th]

  74. [74]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory. Springer-Verlag, 1991

  75. [75]

    Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, “Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,” in Snowmass

  76. [76]

    arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

    5, 2022. arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

  77. [77]

    An Introduction to Higher-Form Symmetries,

    P. R. S. Gomes, “An Introduction to Higher-Form Symmetries,” arXiv:2303.01817 [hep-th]

  78. [78]

    Generalized Charges, Part I: Invertible Symmetries and Higher Representations,

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, Part I: Invertible Symmetries and Higher Representations,” arXiv:2304.02660 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    Higher representations for extended operators,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Higher representations for extended operators,” arXiv:2304.03789 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,” JHEP 02 (2021) 132, arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

Showing first 80 references.