pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20858 · v1 · pith:AEXVSRFQnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🧮 math.AG

A construction of tame sheaves and tame de Rham--Witt cohomology

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 02:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords tame sheavestame sitede Rham-Witt cohomologysyntomic cohomologyNygaard filtrationlog polesreciprocity sheaves
2
0 comments X

The pith

A general construction produces global tame sheaves by gluing local tame sections onto an étale sheaf on X.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an algebraic version of the tame site for a pair of schemes (X, tilde X). It supplies a general method that starts with an étale sheaf on X and a collection of local tame sections and produces a global tame sheaf on that site. The method is applied to the big de Rham-Witt sheaves equipped with tame sections coming from log poles and, over a field, to reciprocity sheaves. From these constructions the authors deduce that tame syntomic cohomology coincides with the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex. A reader would care because the comparison organizes two different approaches to tame ramification in p-adic and arithmetic cohomology.

Core claim

We define an algebraic tame site for the pair (X, tilde X). Using this site we construct a tame sheaf from any étale sheaf on X together with a family of local tame sections. Applying the construction to the big de Rham-Witt sheaves whose tame sections are given by log poles, and to reciprocity sheaves over a field, we obtain a comparison between tame syntomic cohomology and the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex.

What carries the argument

The general machinery that builds a tame sheaf on the algebraic tame site of (X, tilde X) from an étale sheaf on X plus a family of local tame sections.

If this is right

  • The construction applies directly to the big de Rham-Witt sheaves with tame sections defined by log poles.
  • Over a field the same construction applies to reciprocity sheaves.
  • Tame syntomic cohomology is identified with the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex.
  • Several consequences for the cohomology groups follow from the identification.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The gluing technique may be adapted to other sites that encode tame ramification, such as log-étale or pro-étale versions.
  • The resulting comparison could simplify explicit calculations of filtered cohomology groups in mixed characteristic.
  • Similar constructions might relate tame versions of crystalline cohomology to filtered de Rham-Witt data.

Load-bearing premise

The algebraic tame site of the pair (X, tilde X) is well-defined and permits gluing of local tame sections into a single global tame sheaf.

What would settle it

An explicit example of an étale sheaf plus local tame sections on a pair (X, tilde X) for which the gluing fails to define a sheaf on the algebraic tame site, or a concrete computation where tame syntomic cohomology differs from the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex.

read the original abstract

In this article, we consider an algebraic version of the tame site of a pair $(X,\widetilde{X})$. With this definition, we provide a general machinery to construct a tame sheaf from the data of an \'etale sheaf on $X$ and a family of local tame sections. We apply this construction to the big de Rham--Witt sheaves with tame sections defined by log poles and, over a field, to reciprocity sheaves, and deduce some consequences. As an application, we compare tame syntomic cohomology with the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham--Witt complex.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper defines an algebraic version of the tame site for a pair (X, ~X). It develops a general construction of a tame sheaf by gluing an étale sheaf on X together with a family of local tame sections. The construction is applied to big de Rham-Witt sheaves equipped with tame sections defined via log poles, and over a field to reciprocity sheaves. As an application, tame syntomic cohomology is compared with the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex.

Significance. If the gluing construction is shown to produce genuine sheaves whose cohomology computes the expected filtered objects, the work supplies a useful general tool for handling tame cohomology in log-geometric settings and yields a concrete comparison between syntomic and filtered de Rham-Witt cohomology. The provision of an explicit algebraic site and a gluing procedure that works for log-pole sections constitutes a concrete advance over purely topological or analytic approaches to tame sites.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (algebraic tame site): The verification that the proposed covers form a Grothendieck topology and that the glued presheaf satisfies the sheaf axiom for tame covers involving log poles is not carried out in sufficient detail when the log structure is not fine or when X fails to be smooth. This check is load-bearing for the claim that the output of the general machinery is a sheaf rather than a presheaf.
  2. [§4.3] §4.3 (application to big de Rham-Witt sheaves): The comparison of tame syntomic cohomology with the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex (Theorem 4.12) relies on the sheaf property of the glued object; without an explicit descent argument for the relevant covers, the identification of the cohomology groups does not follow.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§1] The notation distinguishing the algebraic tame site from its topological counterpart should be introduced earlier and used consistently throughout the text.
  2. [§3] Several diagrams illustrating the gluing of local tame sections would improve readability of the general construction in §3.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the major points below and will revise the paper accordingly to provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (algebraic tame site): The verification that the proposed covers form a Grothendieck topology and that the glued presheaf satisfies the sheaf axiom for tame covers involving log poles is not carried out in sufficient detail when the log structure is not fine or when X fails to be smooth. This check is load-bearing for the claim that the output of the general machinery is a sheaf rather than a presheaf.

    Authors: We agree that the verification in §2 is presented at a level of generality that assumes fine log structures and smooth X in the main arguments, and that explicit checks for the non-fine and non-smooth cases are needed to fully support the sheaf property. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant subsection of §2 with complete proofs of the Grothendieck topology axioms for the proposed covers and a direct verification of the sheaf axiom for the glued presheaf, treating log-pole sections in full generality. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 (application to big de Rham-Witt sheaves): The comparison of tame syntomic cohomology with the Nygaard filtration on the tame de Rham-Witt complex (Theorem 4.12) relies on the sheaf property of the glued object; without an explicit descent argument for the relevant covers, the identification of the cohomology groups does not follow.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the proof of Theorem 4.12 invokes the sheaf property established earlier and would benefit from an explicit descent argument for the covers appearing in the comparison. In the revision we will insert a short but self-contained descent argument in §4.3 that directly links the sheaf condition for the glued tame de Rham–Witt object to the identification of tame syntomic cohomology with the Nygaard filtration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper defines an algebraic tame site for the pair (X, ~X) and uses it to construct tame sheaves by gluing an étale sheaf on X with local tame sections; this is presented as a general machinery rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. The subsequent applications to big de Rham-Witt sheaves (via log poles), reciprocity sheaves, and the comparison of tame syntomic cohomology with the Nygaard filtration are consequences of the construction once the site and gluing are established. No equations or steps in the provided abstract and description show a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation that collapses the central claim; the work is self-contained as a definitional advance on standard étale and log geometry.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review; ledger entries are inferred from the stated objects and constructions.

axioms (1)
  • standard math The étale topology on X forms a site.
    Used as the base from which tame sheaves are built.
invented entities (2)
  • algebraic tame site of the pair (X, tilde X) no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as the site on which tame sheaves are defined
    Introduced as the algebraic version of the tame site.
  • local tame sections no independent evidence
    purpose: Data used to extend an étale sheaf to a tame sheaf
    Part of the general construction machinery.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 1298 out tokens · 44120 ms · 2026-05-21T02:30:53.162491+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Birational and $\mathbf{A}^1$-invariant lattices in the cohomology of the structure sheaf over non-archimedean fields

    math.AG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Refines cohomology of the structure sheaf to an A¹-invariant theory with O_K-lattice values for smooth schemes over non-archimedean fields using tame cohomology and rigid analytic geometry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Integral p -adic cohomology theories

    Tomoyuki Abe and Richard Crew. Integral p -adic cohomology theories. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07608 , 2021

  2. [2]

    Michael Artin , Alexander Grothendieck , and J. L. Verdier . S\'eminaire de g\'eom\'etrie alg\'ebrique du Bois-Marie 1963--1964. Th\'eorie des topos et cohomologie \'etale des sch\'emas. (SGA 4). Un s\'eminaire dirig\'e par M. Artin, A. Grothendieck, J. L. Verdier. Avec la collaboration de N. Bourbaki, P. Deligne, B. Saint-Donat. Tome 1: Th\'eorie des top...

  3. [3]

    Michael Artin , Alexander Grothendieck , and J. L. Verdier . S\'eminaire de g\'eom\'etrie alg\'ebrique du Bois-Marie 1963--1964. Th\'eorie des topos et cohomologie \'etale des sch\'emas. (SGA 4). Un s\'eminaire dirig\'e par M. Artin, A. Grothendieck, J. L. Verdier. Avec la collaboration de N. Bourbaki, P. Deligne, B. Saint-Donat. Tome 2: Th\'eorie des top...

  4. [4]

    On the joins of hensel rings

    Michael Artin. On the joins of hensel rings. Adv. Math. , 7:282--296, 1971

  5. [5]

    Algebraic cycles and higher K -theory

    Spencer Bloch. Algebraic cycles and higher K -theory. Adv. in Math. , 61(3):267--304, 1986

  6. [6]

    S. Bloch. The moving lemma for higher C how groups. J. Algebraic Geom. , 3(3):537--568, 1994

  7. [7]

    Topological hochschild homology and integral p-adic hodge theory

    Bhargav Bhatt, Matthew Morrow, and Peter Scholze. Topological hochschild homology and integral p-adic hodge theory. Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. , 129:199--310, 2019

  8. [8]

    The basic geometry of W itt vectors, I : T he affine case

    James Borger. The basic geometry of W itt vectors, I : T he affine case. Algebra Number Theory , 5(2):231--285, 2011

  9. [9]

    Commutative algebra

    Nicolas Bourbaki. Commutative algebra. C hapters 1--7 . Elements of Mathematics (Berlin). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. Translated from the French, Reprint of the 1989 English translation

  10. [10]

    Triangulated categories of logarithmic motives over a field , volume 433 of Ast \'e risque

    Federico Binda, Doosung Park, and Paul Arne stv r. Triangulated categories of logarithmic motives over a field , volume 433 of Ast \'e risque . Paris: Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France (SMF), 2022

  11. [11]

    On the cohomology of reciprocity sheaves

    Federico Binda, Kay Rülling, and Shuji Saito. On the cohomology of reciprocity sheaves. Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , 10:e72, 2022

  12. [12]

    The pro-étale topology for schemes

    Bhargav Bhatt and Peter Scholze. The pro-étale topology for schemes. Ast\'erisque , 369:99--201, 2015

  13. [13]

    Desingularization: invariants and strategy---application to dimension 2 , volume 2270 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Vincent Cossart, Uwe Jannsen, and Shuji Saito. Desingularization: invariants and strategy---application to dimension 2 , volume 2270 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Cham, [2020] 2020. With contributions by Bernd Schober

  14. [14]

    Deligne's notes on Nagata compactifications

    Brian Conrad. Deligne's notes on Nagata compactifications. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. , 22(3):205--257, 2007

  15. [15]

    Resolution of singularities of arithmetical threefolds

    Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant. Resolution of singularities of arithmetical threefolds. J. Algebra , 529:268--535, 2019

  16. [16]

    Higher direct images of the structure sheaf in positive characteristic

    Andre Chatzistamatiou and Kay R\"ulling. Higher direct images of the structure sheaf in positive characteristic. Algebra Number Theory , 5(6):693--775, 2011

  17. [17]

    Th \'e orie de Hodge

    Pierre Deligne. Th \'e orie de Hodge . II . ( Hodge theory. II ). Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes \'E tud. Sci. , 40:5--57, 1971

  18. [18]

    Integral p -adic cohomology theories for open and singular varieties, 2021

    Veronika Ertl, Atsushi Shiho, and Johannes Sprang. Integral p -adic cohomology theories for open and singular varieties, 2021. arXiv preprint 2105.11009

  19. [19]

    Foundations of rigid geometry

    Kazuhiro Fujiwara and Fumiharu Kato. Foundations of rigid geometry. I . EMS Monographs in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z\"urich, 2018

  20. [20]

    On the K -theory of complete regular local F _p -algebras

    Thomas Geisser and Lars Hesselholt. On the K -theory of complete regular local F _p -algebras. Topology , 45(3):475--493, 2006

  21. [21]

    The K -theory of fields in characteristic p

    Thomas Geisser and Marc Levine. The K -theory of fields in characteristic p . Invent. Math. , 139:459--493, 2000

  22. [22]

    Almost ring theory , volume 1800 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Ofer Gabber and Lorenzo Ramero. Almost ring theory , volume 1800 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003

  23. [23]

    The big de R ham- W itt complex

    Lars Hesselholt. The big de R ham- W itt complex. Acta Math. , 214(1):135--207, 2015

  24. [24]

    Semi-stable reduction and cystalline cohomology with logarithmic poles

    Osamu Hyodo and Kazuya Kato. Semi-stable reduction and cystalline cohomology with logarithmic poles. Ast\'erisque , 223, 1994

  25. [25]

    On the K -theory of nilpotent endomorphisms

    Lars Hesselholt and Ib Madsen. On the K -theory of nilpotent endomorphisms. In Homotopy methods in algebraic topology ( B oulder, CO , 1999) , volume 271 of Contemp. Math. , pages 127--140. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001

  26. [26]

    Tha tame site of a scheme

    Katharina H\"ubner and Alexander Schmidt. Tha tame site of a scheme. Inv. Math. , 223:397--443, 2020

  27. [27]

    Logarithmic differentials on discretely ringed adic spaces

    Katharina H \"u bner. Logarithmic differentials on discretely ringed adic spaces. arXiv preprint: 2009.14128

  28. [28]

    Tame proper base change for discretely ringed adic spaces

    Katharina H \"u bner. Tame proper base change for discretely ringed adic spaces. arXiv preprint: 2503.13312

  29. [29]

    \'Etale Cohomology of Rigid Analytic Varieties and Adic Spaces , volume 30 of Aspects of Math

    Roland Huber. \'Etale Cohomology of Rigid Analytic Varieties and Adic Spaces , volume 30 of Aspects of Math. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden, 1996

  30. [30]

    The adic tame site

    Katharina H \"u bner. The adic tame site. Doc. Math. , 26:873--945, 2021

  31. [31]

    Complexe de D e R ham-- W itt et cohomologie cristalline

    Luc Illusie. Complexe de D e R ham-- W itt et cohomologie cristalline. Ann. scient. Ec. Norm. Sup. (4) , 12:501--661, 1979

  32. [32]

    P. T. Johnstone. Topos theory . Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], London-New York, 1977. London Mathematical Society Monographs, Vol. 10

  33. [33]

    Modulus sheaves with transfers

    Shane Kelly and Hiroyasu Miyazaki. Modulus sheaves with transfers

  34. [34]

    Motives with modulus, I: Modulus sheaves with transfers for non-proper modulus pairs

    Bruno Kahn, Hiroyasu Miyazaki, Shuji Saito, and Takao Yamazaki. Motives with modulus, I: Modulus sheaves with transfers for non-proper modulus pairs . \'E pij. de G \'e om. Alg. , 5:1--46, 2021

  35. [35]

    A pro-cdh toplogy, 2024

    Shane Kelly and Shuji Saito. A pro-cdh toplogy, 2024

  36. [36]

    Reciprocity sheaves

    Bruno Kahn, Shuji Saito, and Takao Yamazaki. Reciprocity sheaves. Compositio Mathematica , 152(9):1851---1898, 2016. With two appendices by Kay R\"ulling

  37. [37]

    Reciprocity sheaves, II

    Bruno Kahn, Shuji Saito, and Takao Yamazaki. Reciprocity sheaves, II . Homology, Homotopy and Applications , 24(1):71--91, 2022

  38. [38]

    p -adic tame Tate twists

    Morten L \"u ders. p -adic tame Tate twists. Preprint, arXiv :2407.07979 [math. AG ] (2024), 2024

  39. [39]

    Langer and T

    A. Langer and T. Zink. de rham-witt cohomology for a proper and smooth morphism. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu , 3, 2004

  40. [40]

    De R ham- W itt cohomology and displays

    Andreas Langer and Thomas Zink. De R ham- W itt cohomology and displays. Doc. Math. , 12:147--191, 2007

  41. [41]

    Categories for the working mathematician , volume Vol

    Saunders MacLane. Categories for the working mathematician , volume Vol. 5 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1971

  42. [42]

    On relative and overconvergent de rham–witt cohomology for log schemes

    Hironori Matsuue. On relative and overconvergent de rham–witt cohomology for log schemes. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 286:19--87, 2017

  43. [43]

    A motivic integral \(p\) -adic cohomology

    Alberto Merici. A motivic integral \(p\) -adic cohomology. Ann. \(K\)-Theory , 10(3):473--508, 2025

  44. [44]

    James S. Milne. \'E tale cohomology , volume 33 of Princeton Math. Ser. Princeton Univ. Press, 1980

  45. [45]

    Pathologies of modular algebraic surfaces

    David Mumford. Pathologies of modular algebraic surfaces. Amer. J. Math. , 83:339--342, 1961

  46. [46]

    Lecture notes on motivic cohomology , volume 2 of Clay Math

    Carlo Mazza, Vladimir Voevodsky, and Charles Weibel. Lecture notes on motivic cohomology , volume 2 of Clay Math. Monographs . American Mathematical Society, 2006

  47. [47]

    Duality for hodge-witt cohomology with modulus, 2024

    Fei Ren and Kay Rülling. Duality for hodge-witt cohomology with modulus, 2024

  48. [48]

    Reciprocity sheaves and their ramification filtration

    Kay R \"u lling and Shuji Saito. Reciprocity sheaves and their ramification filtration. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu , pages 1--74, 2021

  49. [49]

    Ramification theory for reciprocity sheaves, iii, abbes-saito formula, 2022

    Kay Rülling and Shuji Saito. Ramification theory for reciprocity sheaves, iii, abbes-saito formula, 2022

  50. [50]

    The generalized de R ham- W itt complex over a field is a complex of zero-cycles

    Kay R \"u lling. The generalized de R ham- W itt complex over a field is a complex of zero-cycles. J. Algebraic Geom. , 16(1):109--169, 2007

  51. [51]

    Reciprocity sheaves and logarithmic motives, 2021

    Shuji Saito. Reciprocity sheaves and logarithmic motives, 2021. Accepted for pubblication in Compos. Math., arXiv preprint: 2107.00381

  52. [52]

    S tacks P roject

    Stacks Project Authors . S tacks P roject . http://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2016

  53. [53]

    Inseparable local uniformization

    Michael Temkin. Inseparable local uniformization. J. Algebra , 373:65--119, 2013

  54. [54]

    Descent for the K -theory of polynomial rings

    Wilberd van der Kallen. Descent for the K -theory of polynomial rings. Math. Z. , 191(3):405--415, 1986

  55. [55]

    Cohomological theory of presheaves with transfers

    Vladimir Voevodsky. Cohomological theory of presheaves with transfers. In Cycles, transfers, and motivic homology theories , volume 143 of Ann. of Math. Stud. , pages 87--137. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000