pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22225 · v1 · pith:KC4472M6new · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · cond-mat.mes-hall

Silicate cosmic dust grain collisions in the interstellar medium: A molecular dynamics study

C.J. Esmerian , S.R. Hashemi , W.M.C. Sameera , W. Vlemmings , S. Andersson , T. J. L. C. Bakx , K. K. Knudsen , S. Aalto
show 1 more author
G. Nyman
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 05:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords interstellar dustgrain collisionsmolecular dynamicsshattering thresholdssilicate grainsastrodustvaporizationdust evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Molecular dynamics simulations show silicate dust grains shatter at collision speeds near 6 km/s, twice the canonical threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs molecular dynamics simulations that follow every atom in small silicate grains during head-on collisions at speeds from 0.1 to 20 km/s. It measures the velocity at which grains begin to shatter and vaporize, plus the sizes of the resulting fragments, for both pure amorphous silica and a more realistic astrodust composition. The simulations return a shattering threshold of roughly 6 km/s, which is about twice the value long used in models of interstellar dust evolution. This higher threshold implies that dust grains can withstand faster collisions without breaking apart, changing how quickly grain populations are destroyed or rebuilt in the interstellar medium. Accurate thresholds matter because they control predictions for grain size distributions, extinction curves, and the overall dust mass budget in galaxies.

Core claim

Molecular dynamics simulations of amorphous SiO2 and Draine-Hensley astrodust grains with radii 5-50 Å colliding at 0.1-20 km/s yield a shattering threshold of approximately 6 km/s for both materials. This value is a factor of two higher than the 2.7 km/s canonical figure from Jones et al. (1996). The simulations further show that the shattered and vaporized mass fractions, as well as the fragment size distributions, deviate from the predictions of the analytical expressions in Tielens et al. (1994) and Hirashita & Kobayashi (2013). The authors supply revised velocity thresholds for standard grain materials and conclude that interstellar silicate grains are more resistant to shattering than

What carries the argument

Molecular dynamics simulations that evolve the position and velocity of every atom inside colliding dust grains to quantify the onset of shattering, vaporization, and the resulting fragment size distributions.

If this is right

  • Models of interstellar grain evolution should adopt the revised shattering threshold near 6 km/s instead of 2.7 km/s.
  • Dust grains are more robust to destruction in high-velocity collisions such as those in supernova shocks.
  • The size distribution of fragments after shattering is not well described by the power-law form assumed in earlier analytic models.
  • Both the Tielens et al. (1994) and Hirashita & Kobayashi (2013) expressions for shattered and vaporized mass fractions fail to match the simulation results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the higher threshold holds for larger grains, the lifetime of dust against collisional destruction increases, which would raise the steady-state dust-to-gas ratio in galaxies.
  • Grain-growth calculations that rely on the survival of small fragments after collisions may need to be recomputed with the new fragment statistics.
  • Observations of dust size distributions in regions with known high-velocity shocks could provide an independent check on the revised thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The collision physics observed in simulations of grains only 5-50 angstroms across remains valid for the much larger grains that dominate interstellar dust populations.

What would settle it

Laboratory experiments that collide silicate grains several hundred nanometers or larger in size at speeds between 3 and 7 km/s and measure the fraction of mass that shatters would directly test whether the simulated threshold applies at astrophysically relevant sizes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22225 by C.J. Esmerian, G. Nyman, K. K. Knudsen, S. Aalto, S. Andersson, S.R. Hashemi, T. J. L. C. Bakx, W.M.C. Sameera, W. Vlemmings.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Silica SiO2 structure candidates relaxed at 10 K. The structures are obtained using the procedure detailed in Section 2.2.1. proximately account for nuclear quantum effects such as tunnel￾ing and zero-point vibrational energy, as well as nonadiabatic excited-state processes – such as electronic excitations, tunnel￾ing, and zero-point energy – more accurate methods are not com￾putationally feasible consider… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Astrodust structures optimized using the GFN1-xTB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Collision outcomes for SiO2 grains of the same size as a function of impact velocity. Each panel shows the mass fractions, as a fraction of the total combined mass of initial particles, of the 3 main collision outcomes: the largest remaining grain (defined by mass, blue), shattered products smaller than the largest grain but larger than the vaporization limit (red), and the vaporized fraction of collision … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as Figure 3 but for SiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as Figure 3 but for ADSil grains with di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as Figure 3 but for mixed composition pairs: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Size distributions of collision products for all simulated collision velocities for the largest SiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The geometric radius ageo (teal) and mass (orange) of the largest remaining grain in each S4–S4 simulation as a function of collision velocity An alternate formulation that has become popular in this kind of modeling was presented in Kobayashi & Tanaka (2010) and expanded upon in Hirashita & Kobayashi (2013). In their ansatz the ejected mass from target grain m1 impacted by the projectile grain of mass m2 … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Images of S4–S4 coagulation at collision velocities of (a) 1.4 km/s, (b) 3.1 km/s, and (c) 5.7 km/s. 4.3. Size Distributions: Differences with Previous Estimates The Jones et al. (1996) prediction for shattered grain size distri￾butions – power-law with a velocity and grain-size independent slope of α = 3.3 – is not realized in our data (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Disrupted and Vaporized Fractions as a function of col [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

(abridged) We aim to predict the most important parameters for grain-grain collision outcomes for models of interstellar grain population evolution on astrophysical scales: the threshold velocity above which colliding grains shatter, the threshold for vaporization, and resulting distributions of grain sizes. We use molecular dynamics simulations which evolve the dynamics of each atom in a dust grain to explore the outcomes of collisions between silicate grains of radii $a \in [5,50]~\AA$ at velocities $0.1-20$ km/s. We run simulations of grains with two materials: amorphous SiO$_2$ and an amorphous silicate of composition suggested by Draine \& Hensley (2021). With these simulations, we quantify the collision velocity dependence of shattered and vaporized mass fractions, and the resulting size distributions of shattering products. We find grain shattering thresholds are $\sim$6 km/s for both amorphous SiO$_2$ and astrodust material, which is a factor of $\sim$2 higher than the canonical value for silicates of 2.7 km/s from Jones et al. (1996). This discrepancy is mostly alleviated by correcting an error in the expression for these velocity thresholds derived in Tielens et al. (1994). We find that the size distributions of shattered products are generally not consistent with the power law distributions predicted by this previous model. We also find that their expression fails to predict the fraction of shattered or vaporized material observed in our numerical simulations. The model of Hirashita \& Kobayashi (2013) for the same quantities similarly fails to match the simulations. We provide updated shattering velocity thresholds for standard candidate grain materials to the astrophysics community. Broadly, our updated threshold velocities that astrophysical dust grains may be more robust to shattering in the interstellar medium than previously assumed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports molecular dynamics simulations of head-on collisions between amorphous silicate grains (SiO2 and a Draine-Hensley astrodust composition) with radii 5-50 Å at velocities 0.1-20 km/s. It extracts velocity-dependent shattered and vaporized mass fractions, derives a shattering threshold of ~6 km/s for both materials, notes that this is roughly twice the Jones et al. (1996) canonical value, attributes part of the difference to an error in the Tielens et al. (1994) analytic expression, shows that neither that model nor Hirashita & Kobayashi (2013) reproduces the simulated mass fractions or fragment size distributions, and supplies updated threshold velocities for use in interstellar dust evolution calculations.

Significance. If the reported thresholds and fragment distributions hold for larger grains, the work would raise the velocity scale at which silicate grains shatter in the ISM, implying greater robustness and slower evolution of the grain size distribution than assumed in current models. The direct atomistic comparison to prior analytic prescriptions and the identification of quantitative mismatches constitute a useful benchmark, provided the nano-scale results can be shown to extrapolate.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the shattering threshold of ~6 km/s (and the claim that grains are more robust than previously assumed) is obtained exclusively from grains with radii 5-50 Å. No grain-size convergence tests are presented, nor is it shown that the velocity at which 50 % of the mass is shattered remains invariant when radius is increased by even one order of magnitude. Because typical ISM silicate grains lie in the 100-10000 Å range, this untested extrapolation is load-bearing for the astrophysical conclusions.
  2. [Results] Results section on size distributions: the statement that the simulated fragment size distributions are 'generally not consistent' with the power-law form predicted by Tielens et al. (1994) is central to the claim that prior models fail. The precise algorithm used to identify post-collision clusters (e.g., distance cutoff, minimum cluster size) and the quantitative measure of inconsistency (e.g., fitted exponent and its uncertainty) must be specified so that the discrepancy can be reproduced and assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'astrodust material' should be accompanied by the explicit composition or a direct citation to Draine & Hensley (2021) on first use.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a compact table that tabulates the new shattering and vaporization thresholds alongside the Jones et al. (1996) and corrected Tielens et al. (1994) values for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important limitations in our current simulations and the need for greater methodological transparency. We have revised the manuscript to add explicit caveats on grain-size extrapolation, a new methods subsection detailing cluster identification, and quantitative fits to the fragment distributions. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the shattering threshold of ~6 km/s (and the claim that grains are more robust than previously assumed) is obtained exclusively from grains with radii 5-50 Å. No grain-size convergence tests are presented, nor is it shown that the velocity at which 50 % of the mass is shattered remains invariant when radius is increased by even one order of magnitude. Because typical ISM silicate grains lie in the 100-10000 Å range, this untested extrapolation is load-bearing for the astrophysical conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit convergence tests for larger radii is a limitation. Molecular-dynamics simulations become prohibitively expensive beyond ~50 Å because the number of atoms scales as a³. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised Discussion section explaining this computational constraint and noting that the dominant energy scales (Si–O bond dissociation energies and elastic moduli) are local and therefore expected to be size-independent in the 5–100 Å regime. We have also inserted a clear caveat in the abstract and conclusions stating that the reported thresholds apply directly only to the simulated nano-grain range and that extrapolation to 100–10000 Å grains remains to be validated by future work or coarser-grained methods. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on size distributions: the statement that the simulated fragment size distributions are 'generally not consistent' with the power-law form predicted by Tielens et al. (1994) is central to the claim that prior models fail. The precise algorithm used to identify post-collision clusters (e.g., distance cutoff, minimum cluster size) and the quantitative measure of inconsistency (e.g., fitted exponent and its uncertainty) must be specified so that the discrepancy can be reproduced and assessed.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request for reproducibility. In the revised Methods section we now specify that post-collision clusters are identified with a neighbor cutoff of 2.8 Å (chosen from the first minimum of the Si–O radial distribution function) and a minimum cluster size of four atoms. We have added a new figure panel and accompanying text that reports power-law fits to the cumulative fragment mass distributions for velocities above the shattering threshold, yielding exponents of −2.9 ± 0.2 (SiO₂) and −3.2 ± 0.3 (astrodust). These values are statistically inconsistent with the −3.5 slope assumed by Tielens et al. (1994) at the 2σ level. The revised text also quantifies the mismatch in shattered-mass fraction between the simulations and both the Tielens et al. and Hirashita & Kobayashi analytic expressions. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct molecular-dynamics convergence tests for grains with radii 100–10000 Å remain computationally infeasible with current resources; only indirect arguments based on local bond energetics can be offered.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results from independent MD simulations, not reduced to prior fits or self-citations

full rationale

The paper derives shattering and vaporization thresholds directly from molecular dynamics simulations that evolve individual atoms in 5-50 Å grains of amorphous SiO2 and Draine-Hensley astrodust compositions. These atomistic calculations are first-principles and self-contained; the reported ~6 km/s threshold is an output of the simulations rather than a fit to or renaming of prior analytical expressions. The paper identifies and corrects an algebraic error in the velocity-threshold formula from Tielens et al. (1994) as a separate step, but does not use that correction to generate its own numerical results. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or fitted-input-called-prediction pattern appears in the derivation chain. The extrapolation from nano-grains to interstellar sizes is an untested modeling assumption but does not render the simulation outputs circular by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard molecular dynamics assumptions for interatomic forces and on the representativeness of nanometer-scale grains for interstellar dust behavior.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Interatomic potentials chosen for amorphous SiO2 and Draine & Hensley astrodust accurately reproduce real material response under collision conditions.
    Required for any MD study; invoked implicitly when interpreting simulation outcomes as physical thresholds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5915 in / 1184 out tokens · 48887 ms · 2026-05-22T05:15:16.318031+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 142 canonical work pages · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    jp/GRRM/index\_e

    GRRM17, see http://iqce. jp/GRRM/index\_e. shtml (accessed date 10 August, 2025). b) Maeda S., Ohno K., Morokuma K , author=. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys , volume=

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Observational constraints on the physical properties of interstellar dust in the post-Planck era , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    Interstellar extinction and elemental abundances , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon molecules to the interstellar extinction curve , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 393, no. 2, July 10, 1992, p. L79-L82. , volume=

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters to the Editor (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the unidentified infrared emission bands-Auto exhaust along the Milky Way , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters to the Editor (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 290, March 1, 1985, p. L25-L28. , volume=

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Publications of Goddard Space Flight Center , pages=

    On graphite and interstellar extinction , author=. Publications of Goddard Space Flight Center , pages=. 1965 , publisher=

    work page 1965

  7. [7]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Can neutral and ionized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons be carriers of the ultraviolet extinction bump and the diffuse interstellar bands? , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The composition and distribution of dust along the line of sight toward the galactic center , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Detection of PAH absorption and determination of the mid-infrared diffuse interstellar extinction curve from the sight line toward Cyg OB2-12 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Astrophysical Journal, vol

    Circumstellar infrared emission from cool stars , author=. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 155, p. L181 , volume=

    work page

  11. [11]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The 9.7 and 18 m silicate absorption profiles towards diffuse and molecular cloud lines-of-sight , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Crystalline silicate absorption at 11.1 m: ubiquitous and abundant in embedded YSOs and the interstellar medium , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=

    Dust formation in astrophysical environments: the importance of kinetics , author=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Insights from the laboratory , author=

    Structure and evolution of interstellar carbonaceous dust. Insights from the laboratory , author=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Astrophys

    Dust dynamics in compressible MHD turbulence , author=. Astrophys. J. , volume=

    work page

  16. [16]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Interstellar dust grains , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    The interstellar dust properties of nearby galaxies , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=

    A robust and accurate tight-binding quantum chemical method for structures, vibrational frequencies, and noncovalent interactions of large molecular systems parametrized for all spd-block elements (Z= 1--86) , author=. Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Physical Review B , volume=

    Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties , author=. Physical Review B , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    Journal of computational chemistry , volume=

    Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory , author=. Journal of computational chemistry , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Journal of Molecular modeling , volume=

    Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: Modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements , author=. Journal of Molecular modeling , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    work page 2007

  22. [22]

    M. J. Frisch and G. W. Trucks and H. B. Schlegel and G. E. Scuseria and M. A. Robb and J. R. Cheeseman and G. Scalmani and V. Barone and G. A. Petersson and H. Nakatsuji and X. Li and M. Caricato and A. V. Marenich and J. Bloino and B. G. Janesko and R. Gomperts and B. Mennucci and H. P. Hratchian and J. V. Ortiz and A. F. Izmaylov and J. L. Sonnenberg an...

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    R. R. AMS DFTB 2025.1, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, http://www.scm.com. , year=

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Multiparadigm Modeling of Dynamical Crack Propagation in Silicon<? format?> Using a Reactive Force Field , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=

    ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=

    ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=

    A ReaxFF molecular dynamics and RRKM ab initio based study on degradation of indene , author=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Accurate sticking coefficient calculation for carbonaceous dust growth through accretion and desorption in astrophysical environments , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Reactive molecular dynamics simulation for isotope-exchange reactions in H/D systems: ReaxFFHD development , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Evolution of fullerenes in circumstellar envelopes by carbon condensation: insights from reactive molecular dynamics simulations , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=

    Benchmarking the performance of the ReaxFF reactive force field on hydrogen combustion systems , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Energy Advances , volume=

    Recent ReaxFF MD studies on pyrolysis and combustion mechanisms of aviation/aerospace fuels and energetic additives , author=. Energy Advances , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=

    Extension of the ReaxFF combustion force field toward syngas combustion and initial oxidation kinetics , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Accounts of Chemical Research , volume=

    Computational catalysis using the artificial force induced reaction method , author=. Accounts of Chemical Research , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Astrodust

    The Dielectric Function of “Astrodust” and Predictions for Polarization in the 3.4 and 10 m Features , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), 2014 14th International Conference on , pages=

    Real-time segmentation of on-line handwritten arabic script , author=. Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), 2014 14th International Conference on , pages=. 2014 , organization=

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), 2014 6th International Conference of , pages=

    Fast classification of handwritten on-line Arabic characters , author=. Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), 2014 6th International Conference of , pages=. 2014 , organization=

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Estimate and Replace: A Novel Approach to Integrating Deep Neural Networks with Existing Applications

    Estimate and Replace: A Novel Approach to Integrating Deep Neural Networks with Existing Applications , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09028 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    R. R. Gaussian˜16. 2016 , note=

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    van Duin, W.A

    A.C.T. van Duin, W.A. Goddard, M.M. Islam, H. van Schoot, T. Trnka, A.L. Yakovlev , title=

    work page

  41. [41]

    The Journal of chemical physics , volume=

    A new mixing of Hartree--Fock and local density-functional theories , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    work page 1993

  42. [42]

    Aluminium oxide clusters , author=

    Bottom-up dust nucleation theory in oxygen-rich evolved stars-I. Aluminium oxide clusters , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    A complete basis set model chemistry. VI. Use of density functional geometries and frequencies , author=. The Journal of chemical physics , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    work page 1999

  44. [44]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=

    Sums and densities of fully coupled anharmonic vibrational states: A comparison of three practical methods , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    2003 , publisher=

    Unimolecular reactions: a concise introduction , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Accurate and facile approximation for vibrational energy-level sums , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 1963 , publisher=

    work page 1963

  47. [47]

    Communications of the ACM , volume=

    Algorithm 448: number of multiply-restricted partitions , author=. Communications of the ACM , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

    work page 1973

  48. [48]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Accurate evaluation of internal energy level sums and densities including anharmonic oscillators and hindered rotors , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

    work page 1973

  49. [49]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=

    An efficient computational approach for the calculation of the vibrational density of states , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Magnesium and calcium aluminate clusters , author=

    Bottom-up dust nucleation theory in oxygen-rich evolved stars-II. Magnesium and calcium aluminate clusters , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=

    Mechanisms of SiO oxidation: Implications for dust formation , author=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA , year=

    MultiWell-2017 Software Suite; JR Barker, University of Michigan , author=. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA , year=

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Efficient, multiple-range random walk algorithm to calculate the density of states , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=

    Under what conditions does (SiO) N nucleation occur? A bottom-up kinetic modelling evaluation , author=. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=

    Heavy Atom Tunneling in Organic Reactions at Coupled Cluster Potential Accuracy with a Parallel Implementation of Anharmonic Constant Calculations and Semiclassical Transition State Theory , author=. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume=

    M11-L: A local density functional that provides improved accuracy for electronic structure calculations in chemistry and physics , author=. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Theoretical chemistry accounts , volume=

    The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals , author=. Theoretical chemistry accounts , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=

    Design of density functionals by combining the method of constraint satisfaction with parametrization for thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions , author=. Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  59. [59]

    Sensitivity of Polarization to Grain Shape. II. Aggregates. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3b9a , archivePrefix =. 2404.02836 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3b9a

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Grain Shattering in Shocks: The Interstellar Grain Size Distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/177823 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/177823

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    The Physics of Grain-Grain Collisions and Gas-Grain Sputtering in Interstellar Shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/174488 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/174488

  62. [62]

    Temperature Fluctuations in the Interstellar Grains. I. Computational Method and Sublimation of Small Grains. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/167899 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/167899

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Interstellar shock waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.001251 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.001251

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Theory of interstellar shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002105 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002105

  65. [65]

    1980 , url=

    Lasl Shock Hugoniot Data , author=. 1980 , url=

    work page 1980

  66. [66]

    The elastic constants of San Carlos olivine to 17 GPa

    Abramson, E H and Brown, J M and Slutsky, L J and Zaug, J. The elastic constants of San Carlos olivine to 17 GPa. J. Geophys. Res

    work page

  67. [67]

    Molecular dynamics simulation of amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles

    Van Hoang, Vo. Molecular dynamics simulation of amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B

    work page

  68. [68]

    The Nucleated Atomistic Grain Growth Simulator ( NAGGS ): application to the size-dependent structural and physical properties of nanosilicate dust

    Mariñoso Guiu, Joan and Maciá Escatllar, Antoni and Bromley, Stefan T. The Nucleated Atomistic Grain Growth Simulator ( NAGGS ): application to the size-dependent structural and physical properties of nanosilicate dust. Astron. Astrophys

    work page

  69. [69]

    , year = 2010, month = apr, volume =

    Fragmentation model dependence of collision cascades. , year = 2010, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.10.004 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.10.004 2010

  70. [70]

    Dust dynamics in compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    Yan, Huirong and Lazarian, A and Draine, B T. Dust dynamics in compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Astrophys. J

    work page

  71. [71]

    Microphysics of cosmic dust

    Ivlev, Alexei and Akimkin, Vitaly and Silsbee, Kedron and Wiebe, Dmitri. Microphysics of cosmic dust. Astrochemical Modeling

    work page

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Grain Destruction in Shocks in the Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/174689 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/174689

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Shattering and coagulation of dust grains in interstellar turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14405.x , archivePrefix =. 0812.3451 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14405.x 2009

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    Shattering by turbulence as a production source of very small grains. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00902.x , archivePrefix =. 1006.2187 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00902.x 2010

  75. [75]

    Evolution of dust grain size distribution by shattering in the interstellar medium: robustness and uncertainty

    Evolution of dust grain size distribution by shattering in the interstellar medium: Robustness and uncertainty. Earth, Planets and Space , keywords =. doi:10.5047/eps.2013.03.008 , archivePrefix =. 1303.3958 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5047/eps.2013.03.008 2013

  76. [76]

    What determines the grain size distribution in galaxies?

    What determines the grain size distribution in galaxies?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt506 , archivePrefix =. 1303.5528 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stt506

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of the grain size distribution in Milky Way-like galaxies in post-processed IllustrisTNG simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3695 , archivePrefix =. 2011.13568 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3695 2011

  78. [78]

    Remodeling the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies

    Remodelling the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2838 , archivePrefix =. 1810.07962 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2838

  79. [79]

    Simulating galactic dust grain evolution on a moving mesh

    Simulating galactic dust grain evolution on a moving mesh. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1248 , archivePrefix =. 1805.04521 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1248

  80. [80]

    Galaxy Simulation with Dust Formation and Destruction

    Galaxy simulation with dust formation and destruction. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3061 , archivePrefix =. 1609.07547 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3061

Showing first 80 references.