pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24701 · v1 · pith:JWBYQXXLnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 🌊 nlin.AO · cond-mat.stat-mech

Self-consistent analysis of the Kuramoto model with higher-order interactions

Chanin Kumpeerakij , Juan G. Restrepo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.AO cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Kuramoto modelhigher-order interactionshypergraphssynchronizationbistabilityself-consistent analysisorder parameterseigenvector correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The critical triadic coupling for bistability in the Kuramoto model on hypergraphs depends on correlations between dyadic adjacency eigenvectors and the triadic structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a self-consistent analytical framework for the Kuramoto model that includes both dyadic and triadic interactions on finite hypergraphs. It introduces generalized local order parameters to track combined phase correlations and derives a hierarchy of approximations for local and global synchronization measures. These approximations yield explicit expressions for critical coupling strengths, with the onset of bistability tied specifically to eigenvector correlations rather than mean-field assumptions. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach handles realistic network realizations and frequency distributions that prior all-to-all or thermodynamic-limit methods cannot address.

Core claim

A hierarchy of self-consistent approximations for local and global order parameters shows that the critical triadic coupling strength governing the onset of bistability is determined by correlations between the eigenvectors of the dyadic adjacency matrix and the triadic interaction structure, with the framework applying to both homogeneous and heterogeneous hypergraphs without requiring all-to-all coupling.

What carries the argument

Generalized local order parameters capturing combined dyadic and triadic phase correlations, together with the derived hierarchy of approximation schemes for synchronization order parameters.

If this is right

  • Critical coupling strengths for the onset of synchronization and bistability follow directly from the eigenvector correlations.
  • The approximation hierarchy produces distinct regimes of accuracy for homogeneous versus heterogeneous hypergraphs.
  • Generalized local order parameters allow tracking of combined pairwise and three-body phase correlations.
  • Numerical simulations confirm the theory across different hypergraph structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same correlation-based dependence could be tested in models with four-body or higher interactions.
  • Hypergraph design choices that minimize or maximize the relevant eigenvector correlations might be used to control the width of the bistable region.
  • The framework suggests a route to extend the analysis to directed or weighted hypergraphs without changing the core self-consistency step.

Load-bearing premise

The hierarchy of approximations for the local and global synchronization order parameters remains accurate for finite hypergraph realizations and specific frequency distributions.

What would settle it

A direct numerical simulation on a finite hypergraph realization where the observed onset of bistability deviates from the value predicted by the eigenvector-correlation formula for the critical triadic coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24701 by Chanin Kumpeerakij, Juan G. Restrepo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Effect of hypergraph structure on Kc 3 . (Top panels) Nodes {n, m, j} have high values of Vn, Um, Uj , respectively (e.g., by having large dyadic degrees), while nodes {n ′ , m′ , j′} have low values of Vn′ , Um′ , Uj ′ . Configurations where hyperedges couple oscillator triplets {n, m, j} and {n ′ , m′ , j′} (a) have lower values of Kc 3 than those where those hyperedges couple other triplets, {n, m, j′} … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Global order parameter R(2) as a function of K2/Kc 2 for uniform (top) and power-law (bottom) degree distributions (N = 20, 000, ⟨kn⟩ = 500). Panels (a) and (c) show the weak triadic coupling regime (K3 < Kc 3 ), while (b) and (d) show the strong triadic coupling regime (K3 > Kc 3 ). Solid and dashed lines denote forward and backward parameter sweeps, respectively. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p01… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of small network experiments with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Synchronization response S calculated for a power-law degree distribution with γ = 3.0 and N = 3000. The dyadic coupling is fixed at K2 = 0.95Kc 2 . (a) shows the system below the onset of bistability with K3 = 0.5Kc 3 , where the order parameter remains near zero. (b) shows the system in the bistable regime with K3 = 1.25Kc 3 . 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Synchronization response S (indicating bistability) for different degree distributions as a function of K3/Kc 3 . Panels (a)-(c) show power-law distributions, while (d) shows the uniform case. Overall, these results show that Eq. (51) provides the most robust predictions for the onset of bistability Kc 3 , especially for hypergraphs with heterogeneous structure. 5.7 Effect of hypergraph correlations on the… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Synchronization response S (indicating bistability) versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the synchronization transition, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Chosen hyperedges before rewiring. (b) Hyperedges with nodes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Kuramoto model with higher-order interactions has recently been shown to exhibit bistability, explosive synchronization transitions, and rich collective dynamics. Existing analytical approaches, however, typically rely on all-to-all coupling or mean-field approximations of the underlying hypergraph structure. While these methods describe typical networks in the thermodynamic limit, they generally fail to capture the effects of finite hypergraph and oscillator frequency realizations. To address this limitation, we develop a self-consistent analytical framework for the Kuramoto model with dyadic and triadic interactions on hypergraphs. We introduce generalized local order parameters that capture the combined effects of dyadic and triadic phase correlations, and derive a hierarchy of approximation schemes for the local and global synchronization order parameters. Using these approximations, we determine critical coupling strengths for the onset of synchronization and bistability. In particular, we show that the critical triadic coupling strength governing the onset of bistability depends on correlations between the eigenvectors of the dyadic adjacency matrix and the triadic interaction structure. Numerical simulations on homogeneous and heterogeneous hypergraphs validate the theory and illustrate the distinct regimes of applicability of the approximation schemes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a self-consistent analytical framework for the Kuramoto model with both dyadic and triadic interactions on hypergraphs. It introduces generalized local order parameters that incorporate combined dyadic-triadic phase correlations and derives a hierarchy of approximation schemes for local and global synchronization order parameters. Using these, the authors obtain critical coupling strengths for the onset of synchronization and bistability, with the central claim that the critical triadic coupling governing bistability depends on correlations between the eigenvectors of the dyadic adjacency matrix and the triadic interaction structure. The framework is tested via numerical simulations on homogeneous and heterogeneous hypergraphs.

Significance. If the hierarchy of approximations remains quantitatively accurate for finite hypergraphs and general frequency distributions, the work would provide a useful advance over thermodynamic-limit or all-to-all mean-field treatments by linking bistability thresholds directly to structural eigenvector correlations in higher-order networks.

major comments (1)
  1. [Hierarchy of approximation schemes for local and global order parameters] The derivation of the hierarchy of approximation schemes (described in the abstract and the section introducing the self-consistent equations): the central claim that the critical triadic coupling depends on eigenvector correlations is obtained by closing the equations for the generalized local order parameters via truncation or averaging of higher-order phase correlations. The manuscript must supply explicit conditions, error estimates, or numerical diagnostics showing that this closure does not shift the effective threshold by an O(1) amount on typical finite-N hypergraphs with non-uniform frequencies; otherwise the claimed structural dependence cannot be guaranteed to appear in the actual dynamics.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework 'contrasts with thermodynamic-limit or all-to-all methods' but does not specify the precise form of the generalized local order parameters or the truncation level used in each scheme in the hierarchy; adding one sentence on these points would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive major comment. We respond point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of the hierarchy of approximation schemes (described in the abstract and the section introducing the self-consistent equations): the central claim that the critical triadic coupling depends on eigenvector correlations is obtained by closing the equations for the generalized local order parameters via truncation or averaging of higher-order phase correlations. The manuscript must supply explicit conditions, error estimates, or numerical diagnostics showing that this closure does not shift the effective threshold by an O(1) amount on typical finite-N hypergraphs with non-uniform frequencies; otherwise the claimed structural dependence cannot be guaranteed to appear in the actual dynamics.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation on the validity of the closures. The manuscript already reports numerical simulations on finite-N homogeneous and heterogeneous hypergraphs with non-uniform frequency distributions; these show quantitative agreement with the predicted critical triadic couplings and their dependence on dyadic-triadic eigenvector correlations, indicating that the truncations do not produce O(1) threshold shifts in the tested cases. In revision we will add explicit numerical diagnostics (error between closed-form and simulated order parameters versus N and frequency variance) together with a short discussion of the observed applicability regimes. We note that fully rigorous a-priori error bounds for arbitrary hypergraphs remain outside the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation self-contained via independent approximations

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a self-consistent framework deriving critical couplings from generalized local order parameters and a hierarchy of approximations on hypergraphs. No equations or sections are available to quote that would exhibit self-definitional reduction, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim on eigenvector correlations for bistability onset is presented as emerging from the derived hierarchy rather than by construction from inputs, and the paper explicitly positions the approach as independent of thermodynamic-limit assumptions. This is the expected honest non-finding for a derivation that remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the generalized local order parameters can be identified from the provided text.

invented entities (1)
  • generalized local order parameters no independent evidence
    purpose: capture combined effects of dyadic and triadic phase correlations
    Introduced to extend standard order parameters to higher-order interactions on hypergraphs

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5727 in / 1219 out tokens · 43187 ms · 2026-06-30T12:00:31.188354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Rohden M, Sorge A, Timme M and Witthaut D 2012Physical Review Letters109ISSN 1079- 7114 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.064101 17 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Kumpeerakij and Restrepo

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.064101

  2. [2]

    Varela F, Lachaux J P, Rodriguez E and Martinerie J 2001Nature Reviews Neuroscience2 229–239 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/35067550

    work page doi:10.1038/35067550

  3. [3]

    Breakspear M 2017Nature Neuroscience20340–351 URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/nn.4497

  4. [4]

    N´ eda Z, Ravasz E, Vicsek T, Brechet Y and Barab´ asi A L 2000Phys. Rev. E61(6) 6987–6992 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.6987

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.61.6987

  5. [5]

    Castellano C, Fortunato S and Loreto V 2009Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2) 591–646 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591

  6. [6]

    Acebr´ on J A, Bonilla L L, P´ erez Vicente C J, Ritort F and Spigler R 2005Rev. Mod. Phys. 77(1) 137–185 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.137

  7. [7]

    Kuramoto YSelf-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear oscillators(Springer-Verlag) p 420–422 ISBN 3540071741 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0013365

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0013365

  8. [8]

    Strogatz S H 2000Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena1431–20 ISSN 0167-2789 URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00094-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00094-4

  9. [9]

    Iacopini I, Karsai M and Barrat A 2024Nature Communications15ISSN 2041-1723 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50918-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50918-5 2041

  10. [10]

    Cutts and Stephen J

    Yu S, Yang H, Nakahara H, Santos G S, Nikoli´ c D and Plenz D 2011The Journal of Neu- roscience3117514–17526 ISSN 1529-2401 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 3127-11.2011

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci 2011

  11. [11]

    Combrisson E, Basanisi R, Neri M, Auzias G, Petri G, Marinazzo D, Panzeri S and Brov- elli A 2025Nature Communications16ISSN 2041-1723 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-025-62507-1

    2041

  12. [12]

    Bullmore E and Sporns O 2009Nature Reviews Neuroscience10312–312 ISSN 1471-0048 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2618

    work page doi:10.1038/nrn2618

  13. [13]

    Ashwin P and Rodrigues A 2016Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena32514–24 ISSN 0167-2789 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167278915300439

  14. [14]

    Le´ on I and Paz´ o D 2019Phys. Rev. E100(1) 012211 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.100.012211

  15. [15]

    2020.05.004

    Battiston F, Cencetti G, Iacopini I, Latora V, Lucas M, Patania A, Young J G and Petri G 2020 Physics Reports8741–92 ISSN 0370-1573 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2020.05.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep 2020

  16. [16]

    doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00485-0

    Skardal P S and Arenas A 2020Communications Physics3ISSN 2399-3650 URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00485-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-020-00485-0

  17. [17]

    Skardal P S and Arenas A 2019Phys. Rev. Lett.122(24) 248301 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.248301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.248301

  18. [18]

    Skardal P S, Arola-Fern´ andez L, Taylor D and Arenas A 2021Phys. Rev. Res.3(4) 043193 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043193

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043193

  19. [19]

    Xu C, Wang X and Skardal P S 2020Phys. Rev. Res.2(2) 023281 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023281

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023281

  20. [20]

    Sabhahit N G, Khurd A S and Jalan S 2024Physical Review E109ISSN 2470-0053 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024212

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.024212

  21. [21]

    Adhikari S, Restrepo J G and Skardal P S 2023Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33ISSN 1089-7682 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0116747

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0116747

  22. [22]

    Iacopini I, Petri G, Barrat A and Latora V 2019Nature Communications102485 URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10431-6

  23. [23]

    de Arruda G F, Petri G and Moreno Y 2020Physical Review Research2023032 URLhttps: //journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023032 18 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Kumpeerakij and Restrepo

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023032

  24. [24]

    Landry N W and Restrepo J G 2022Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 32ISSN 1089-7682 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0086905

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0086905

  25. [25]

    Grilli J, Barab´ as G, Michalska-Smith M J and Allesina S 2017Nature548210–213 URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/nature23273

  26. [26]

    Ott E and Antonsen T M 2008Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science18 ISSN 1089-7682 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2930766

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2930766

  27. [27]

    Restrepo J G, Ott E and Hunt B R 2005Physical Review E71ISSN 1550-2376 URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036151

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.71.036151

  28. [28]

    Ichinomiya T 2004Phys. Rev. E70(2) 026116 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.70.026116

  29. [29]

    Lee D S 2005Phys. Rev. E72(2) 026208 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.72.026208

  30. [30]

    Barlev G, Antonsen T M and Ott E 2011Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science21025103 ISSN 1054-1500 (Preprinthttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/ cha/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3596711/14605917/025103_1_online.pdf) URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1063/1.3596711

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3596711/14605917/025103_1_online.pdf

  31. [31]

    Restrepo J G and Ott E 2014Europhysics Letters10760006 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1209/ 0295-5075/107/60006

  32. [32]

    Rodrigues F A, Peron T K D, Ji P and Kurths J 2016Physics Reports6101–98 ISSN 0370-1573 the Kuramoto model in complex networks URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0370157315004408

  33. [33]

    Wang X, Zheng Z and Xu C 2021Phys. Rev. E104(5) 054208 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.054208

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.104.054208

  34. [34]

    Xu C, Zhai Y, Wu Y, Zheng Z and Guan S 2023Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 170113343 ISSN 0960-0779 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0960077923002448

  35. [35]

    Mill´ an A P, Torres J J and Bianconi G 2020Phys. Rev. Lett.124(21) 218301 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.218301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.218301

  36. [36]

    Bick C, Gross E, Harrington H A and Schaub M T 2023SIAM Review65686–731 URL https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1414024

    work page doi:10.1137/21m1414024

  37. [37]

    Pastor-Satorras R, Castellano C, Van Mieghem P and Vespignani A 2015Rev. Mod. Phys.87(3) 925–979 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.925

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.925

  38. [38]

    Dorogovtsev S N, Goltsev A V and Mendes J F F 2008Rev. Mod. Phys.80(4) 1275–1335 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1275

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1275

  39. [39]

    Castellano C and Pastor-Satorras R 2010Phys. Rev. Lett.105(21) 218701 URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.218701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.218701

  40. [40]

    Goltsev A V, Dorogovtsev S N, Oliveira J G and Mendes J F F 2012Phys. Rev. Lett.109(12) 128702 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.128702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.128702

  41. [41]

    Chung F and Lu L 2002Annals of Combinatorics6125–145 ISSN 0218-0006 URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00012580

    work page doi:10.1007/pl00012580

  42. [42]

    Zhou D, Huang J and Sch¨ olkopf B 2007Learning with Hypergraphs: Clustering, Classification, and Embedding(The MIT Press) p 1601–1608 ISBN 9780262256919 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0205

    work page doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0205

  43. [43]

    Stasi D, Sadeghi K, Rinaldo A, Petrovi´ c S and Fienberg S E 2014βmodels for random hyper- graphs with a given degree sequence URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Matamalas J T, G´ omez S and Arenas A 2020Physical Review Research2012049 URLhttps: //journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012049 19 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Kumpeerakij and Restrepo

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.012049

  45. [45]

    Kumpeerakij C 2024 Self-consistence-km: Numerical simulations and analytical framework for higher-order kuramoto modelshttps://github.com/chku-ucb/self-consistence-km.git

    2024

  46. [46]

    (13) To derive Eq

    Newman M E 2003Physical review E67026126 URLhttps://journals.aps.org/pre/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126 Appendix A Derivation of Eq. (13) To derive Eq. (13), we need to show that the second and third terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (12) are zero. The second term can be rewritten as X |ωm|≤Hm Anm ωm Hm = NX m=1 Anm ωm Hm I[−Hm,Hm](ωm) (58) = NX m...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.67.026126