pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25155 · v1 · pith:O3KNY2VNnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · 🧬 q-bio.QM

Automated multi-dataset INST ¹³C metabolic flux analysis at microliter scale reveals robust fluxes but variable metabolite pools in Corynebacterium~glutamicum

Jochen Nie{\ss}er , Anton Stratmann , Martin Bey{\ss} , Wolfgang Wiechert , Katharina N\"oh , Stephan Noack This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 22:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM
keywords INST 13C-MFAmetabolic flux analysisCorynebacterium glutamicumethanolmetabolite poolsglyoxylate shunthigh-throughput fluxomicsmicroliter scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-dataset INST 13C-MFA at microliter scale yields robust fluxes but variable metabolite pools in C. glutamicum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an automated robotic workflow that runs parallel transient 13C labeling experiments in 48-well plates at microliter volumes, using hot isopropanol quenching and LC-QToF-MS to generate multiple tracer datasets for the same strain. These datasets are then combined in a single computational model that simultaneously estimates intracellular fluxes and metabolite pool sizes. The joint fit improves flux precision over single experiments while showing that net fluxes remain consistent across datasets; metabolite pool estimates, however, vary and fail to converge. The resulting flux map identifies the glyoxylate shunt as central during growth on ethanol. This approach reduces experimental cost and increases throughput compared with conventional bioreactor-based INST 13C-MFA.

Core claim

Automated multi-dataset INST 13C-MFA performed at microliter scale with robotic liquid handling, rapid quenching, and LC-QToF-MS analytics enables joint estimation of fluxes and pool sizes from parallel ethanol-tracer experiments. Net fluxes prove robust across datasets and gain precision from the combined data, whereas pool-size estimates remain variable and do not converge under joint inference, revealing a methodological distinction from single-dataset analysis. The resulting flux map assigns a central role to the glyoxylate shunt during growth on the C2 substrate ethanol.

What carries the argument

Multi-dataset INST 13C-MFA that performs joint inference of fluxes and metabolite pool sizes across parallel tracer datasets generated by miniaturized robotic experiments.

If this is right

  • Net intracellular fluxes can be determined with higher precision by combining multiple INST datasets than by analyzing any single dataset alone.
  • Metabolite pool sizes estimated from single versus multi-dataset fits differ, indicating that pool-size inference is sensitive to the number and choice of labeling experiments.
  • The glyoxylate shunt carries substantial flux during growth of the evolved C. glutamicum strain on ethanol.
  • The miniaturized workflow produces flux maps at a fraction of the cost and time of conventional bioreactor INST 13C-MFA.
  • The method supplies quantitative flux data suitable for iterative strain engineering cycles in biofoundries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If pool sizes do not converge under joint inference, models that treat pools as fixed parameters may need re-examination for consistency across labeling conditions.
  • The workflow could be extended to other substrates or organisms where stationary labeling yields low information content.
  • Variable pool estimates may reflect real biological heterogeneity or unmodeled measurement offsets that future analytics improvements could resolve.
  • High-throughput flux data at this scale could support automated model refinement loops that alternate between experiment and simulation within the same robotic platform.

Load-bearing premise

Datasets produced by the miniaturized quenching and analytics pipeline contain no scale-specific artifacts that would bias the joint pool-size estimates when the datasets are combined.

What would settle it

Repeating the multi-dataset analysis with an independent set of larger-volume experiments on the same strain and substrate and finding that pool-size estimates still fail to converge or that flux values shift systematically.

read the original abstract

Isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analysis (INST $^{13}$C-MFA) provides unique insights into cellular physiology but is typically limited by low throughput and high experimental costs. Here, we present a miniaturized and automated workflow that integrates transient isotope labeling experiments with advanced computational modeling to enable parallel INST $^{13}$C-MFA at microliter scale. The approach is demonstrated for an evolved $Corynebacterium~glutamicum$ strain capable of efficient growth on ethanol, a substrate for which isotopically stationary $^{13}$C-MFA is inherently limited due to low labeling diversity. Using robotic liquid handling, rapid hot isopropanol quenching, and LC-QToF-MS-based analytics, highly informative datasets were generated from parallel 48-well experiments with different ethanol tracers. Multi-dataset INST $^{13}$C-MFA unlocked joint estimation of intracellular fluxes and metabolite pool sizes and significantly improved flux precision compared to single-dataset analyses. While net fluxes were robust across datasets, pool size estimates exhibited variability and did not converge under joint inference, highlighting a fundamental methodological difference to single-dataset INST $^{13}$C-MFA. The resulting multi-dataset flux map reveals a central role of the glyoxylate shunt during growth on ethanol, consistent with metabolic adaption to C2-based substrate utilization. Overall, this work demonstrates that automated multi-dataset INST $^{13}$C-MFA is technically feasible and provides high-quality flux analysis at a fraction of the cost of conventional lab-scale bioreactor-based approaches. The presented workflow establishes a scalable framework for high-throughput quantitative fluxomics in microbial biotechnology and supports integration into iterative strain engineering and biofoundry pipelines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a miniaturized, robotic workflow for parallel INST 13C-MFA experiments at microliter scale in 48-well plates, using hot isopropanol quenching and LC-QToF-MS analytics on an evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum strain growing on ethanol. Multiple ethanol tracers are employed to generate datasets that are then jointly fitted, yielding intracellular fluxes and metabolite pool sizes. The central claims are that multi-dataset fitting improves flux precision relative to single-dataset analyses, that net fluxes remain robust across datasets, and that metabolite pool sizes exhibit variability and fail to converge under joint inference, while the resulting flux map shows a prominent glyoxylate shunt consistent with C2-substrate adaptation. The workflow is positioned as a scalable, low-cost alternative to conventional bioreactor-based INST-MFA.

Significance. If the joint multi-dataset inference is free of scale-dependent bias, the approach would represent a meaningful advance in throughput for quantitative fluxomics, enabling integration into biofoundry pipelines. The reported robustness of net fluxes across independent tracer datasets is a positive indicator of internal consistency. However, the absence of any orthogonal validation for absolute pool-size estimates limits the strength of the claim that variability reflects a fundamental methodological difference rather than measurement artifact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results (multi-dataset fitting)] The claim that multi-dataset INST 13C-MFA 'significantly improved flux precision' and that pool sizes 'exhibited variability and did not converge' (Abstract) rests on the untested premise that the 48-well robotic quenching and LC-QToF-MS datasets can be combined without introducing systematic offsets in absolute concentrations. No cross-validation of pool sizes against an orthogonal assay, larger-scale bioreactor controls, or internal standards that would isolate quenching-volume or matrix effects is described; because INST-MFA pool-size identifiability is known to be sensitive to absolute scaling, this omission directly affects the interpretation of both the precision gain and the reported non-convergence.
  2. [Methods (quenching and analytics) / Results (pool-size estimates)] The manuscript states that the miniaturized workflow produces 'highly informative datasets' that can be directly used for joint estimation, yet provides no quantitative assessment (e.g., recovery of known pool sizes from spiked standards or comparison of labeling dynamics at different culture volumes) to rule out scale-specific artifacts in the quenching or ionization steps. This is load-bearing for the assertion that the observed pool-size variability is biological rather than methodological.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods (computational modeling)] Notation for the joint objective function and weighting of the multiple tracer datasets should be made explicit; it is currently unclear how the different labeling time courses are combined in the parameter estimation.
  2. [Figures] Figure legends should report the number of biological replicates and the exact number of independent tracer experiments included in the multi-dataset fits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive critique. The comments correctly identify that our claims regarding metabolite pool-size variability rest on an assumption of dataset combinability that lacks explicit orthogonal validation. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results (multi-dataset fitting)] The claim that multi-dataset INST 13C-MFA 'significantly improved flux precision' and that pool sizes 'exhibited variability and did not converge' (Abstract) rests on the untested premise that the 48-well robotic quenching and LC-QToF-MS datasets can be combined without introducing systematic offsets in absolute concentrations. No cross-validation of pool sizes against an orthogonal assay, larger-scale bioreactor controls, or internal standards that would isolate quenching-volume or matrix effects is described; because INST-MFA pool-size identifiability is known to be sensitive to absolute scaling, this omission directly affects the interpretation of both the precision gain and the reported non-convergence.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of orthogonal validation for absolute pool sizes limits the strength of interpreting the observed non-convergence as a fundamental methodological difference rather than a possible measurement artifact. The robustness of net fluxes across independent tracer datasets remains the primary internal consistency check. In the revised manuscript we will (i) qualify the Abstract and Results statements on pool-size variability to note that absolute scaling was not independently validated, (ii) emphasize that the reported precision gain applies specifically to flux estimates, and (iii) add a limitations paragraph discussing potential scale-dependent quenching or ionization effects. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods (quenching and analytics) / Results (pool-size estimates)] The manuscript states that the miniaturized workflow produces 'highly informative datasets' that can be directly used for joint estimation, yet provides no quantitative assessment (e.g., recovery of known pool sizes from spiked standards or comparison of labeling dynamics at different culture volumes) to rule out scale-specific artifacts in the quenching or ionization steps. This is load-bearing for the assertion that the observed pool-size variability is biological rather than methodological.

    Authors: The referee is correct; no spiked-standard recovery or cross-volume labeling comparison is reported. Because such experiments would require additional wet-lab work outside the current dataset, we cannot supply them in revision. We will instead revise the text to remove any implication that pool-size variability is necessarily biological and will explicitly state that the joint-inference results for pool sizes should be interpreted with caution pending future absolute-quantification controls. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative validation of absolute pool-size recovery (spiked standards or bioreactor comparison) is absent from the existing experimental record and cannot be generated without new experiments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on experimental data comparison

full rationale

The manuscript describes an automated experimental workflow for generating INST 13C-MFA datasets at microliter scale and reports empirical outcomes from single- versus multi-dataset fitting. No derivation chain, fitted-parameter prediction, or self-citation load-bearing step is present; net-flux robustness and pool-size variability are direct outputs of the joint inference on measured labeling and concentration data. The central result (improved flux precision under joint estimation) is therefore falsifiable against the raw datasets and does not reduce to any input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters or invented entities; the work rests on standard domain assumptions of metabolic flux analysis.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Metabolic network is at metabolic steady state during the transient labeling experiment
    Required for INST MFA modeling; standard in the field
  • domain assumption Quenching and extraction preserve intracellular metabolite pools without scale-dependent bias
    Necessary for reliable pool-size estimation from microliter cultures

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5870 in / 1391 out tokens · 44470 ms · 2026-06-29T22:36:28.162282+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nießer, M

    J. Nießer, M. F. Müller, J. Kappelmann, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. Hot isopropanol quenching procedure for automated microtiter plate scale 13 C-labeling experiments . Microb. Cell Fact., 21: 0 78, 2022. doi:10.1186/s12934-022-01806-4

    work page doi:10.1186/s12934-022-01806-4 2022

  2. [2]

    o h, S. Niedenf \

    K. N \" o h, S. Niedenf \" u hr, M. Bey , and W. Wiechert. A Pareto approach to resolve the conflict between information gain and experimental costs: Multiple-criteria design of carbon labeling experiments . PLOS Comput. Biol., 14: 0 e1006533, 2018. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006533

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006533 2018

  3. [3]

    Y. Yuan, T. Hoon Yang , and E. Heinzle. 13 C metabolic flux analysis for larger scale cultivation using gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry . Metab. Eng., 12: 0 392--400, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2010.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2010.02.001 2010

  4. [4]

    Bachleitner, O

    S. Bachleitner, O. Ata, and D. Mattanovich. The potential of CO _2 -based production cycles in biotechnology to fight the climate crisis. Nat. Commun., 14: 0 6978, 2023. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42790-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42790-6 2023

  5. [5]

    M. Bey , S. Azzouzi, M. Weitzel, W. Wiechert, and K. N \" o h. The design of FluxML: A universal modeling language for 13 C metabolic flux analysis . Front. Microbiol., 10, 2019. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01022

    work page doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01022 2019

  6. [6]

    Droste, K

    P. Droste, K. N \" o h, and W. Wiechert. Omix -- a visualization tool for metabolic networks with highest usability and customizability in focus . Chem. Ing. Tech., 85: 0 849--862, 2013. doi:10.1002/cite.201200234

    work page doi:10.1002/cite.201200234 2013

  7. [7]

    Drysch, M

    A. Drysch, M. El Massaoudi, C. Mack, R. Takors, A. A. de Graaf, and H. Sahm. Production process monitoring by serial mapping of microbial carbon flux distributions using a novel sensor reactor approach: II -- 13 C -labeling-based metabolic flux analysis and l- L ysine production. Metab. Eng., 5: 0 96--107, 2003. doi:10.1016/S1096-7176(03)00005-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s1096-7176(03)00005-3 2003

  8. [8]

    Eggeling and M

    L. Eggeling and M. Bott. Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamicum . CRC Press, 2005. doi:10.1201/9781420039696

    work page doi:10.1201/9781420039696 2005

  9. [10]

    A. Fina, P. Millard, J. Albiol, P. Ferrer, and S. Heux. High throughput 13 C-metabolic flux analysis of 3-hydroxypropionic acid producing Pichia pastoris reveals limited availability of acetyl-CoA and ATP due to tight control of the glycolytic flux . Microb. Cell Fact., 22, 2023. doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02123-0

    work page doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02123-0 2023

  10. [11]

    Fritzson

    P. Fritzson. Modelica: Equation-based, object-oriented modelling of physical systems. In Foundations of Multi-Paradigm Modelling for Cyber-Physical Systems, pages 45--96. Springer International Publishing, 2020

    2020

  11. [12]

    Halle, N

    L. Halle, N. Hollmann, N. Tenhaef, L. Mbengi, C. Glitz, W. Wiechert, T. Polen, M. Baumgart, M. Bott, and S. Noack. Robotic workflows for automated long-term adaptive laboratory evolution: I mproving ethanol utilization by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Cell Fact., 22: 0 175, 2023. doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02180-5

    work page doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02180-5 2023

  12. [13]

    Heinrich, C

    P. Heinrich, C. Kohler, L. Ellmann, P. Kuerner, R. Spang, P. J. Oefner, and K. Dettmer. Correcting for natural isotope abundance and tracer impurity in MS-, MS/MS- and high-resolution-multiple-tracer-data from stable isotope labeling experiments with IsoCorrectoR . Scientific Reports, 8: 0 17910, 2018. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36293-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36293-4 2018

  13. [14]

    Hemmerich, N

    J. Hemmerich, N. Tenhaef, C. Steffens, J. Kappelmann, M. Weiske, S. J. Reich, W. Wiechert, M. Oldiges, and S. Noack. Less sacrifice, more insight: Repeated low-volume sampling of microbioreactor cultivations enables accelerated deep phenotyping of microbial strain libraries. J. Biotechnol., 14: 0 e1800428, 2019. doi:10.1002/biot.201800428

    work page doi:10.1002/biot.201800428 2019

  14. [15]

    Hemmerich, N

    J. Hemmerich, N. Tenhaef, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. pyFOOMB : Python framework for object oriented modeling of bioprocesses. Eng. Life Sci., 21: 0 242--257, 2021. doi:10.1002/elsc.202000088

    work page doi:10.1002/elsc.202000088 2021

  15. [16]

    S. Heux, J. Poinot, S. Massou, S. Sokol, and J. C. Portais. A novel platform for automated high-throughput fluxome profiling of metabolic variants. Metab. Eng., 25: 0 8--19, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.06.001 2014

  16. [17]

    Jungreuthmayer, S

    C. Jungreuthmayer, S. Neubauer, T. Mairinger, J. Zanghellini, and S. Hann. ICT: isotope correction toolbox . Bioinformatics, 32: 0 154--156, 2015. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv514

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv514 2015

  17. [18]

    Kanehisa and S

    M. Kanehisa and S. Goto. KEGG : kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 28: 0 27--30, 2000. doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29 2000

  18. [19]

    Kappelmann, W

    J. Kappelmann, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. Cutting the Gordian Knot: Identifiability of anaplerotic reactions in Corynebacterium glutamicum by means of 13 C-metabolic flux analysis . Biotechnol. Bioeng., 113: 0 661--674, 2016. doi:10.1002/bit.25833

    work page doi:10.1002/bit.25833 2016

  19. [20]

    Kappelmann, B

    J. Kappelmann, B. Klein, P. Geilenkirchen, and S. Noack. Comprehensive and accurate tracking of carbon origin of LC-tandem mass spectrometry collisional fragments for 13 C-MFA . Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 409: 0 2309--2326, 2017. doi:10.1007/s00216-016-0174-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00216-016-0174-9 2017

  20. [21]

    Keilhauer, L

    C. Keilhauer, L. Eggeling, and H. Sahm. Isoleucine synthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum: Molecular analysis of the ilvb-ilvn-ilvc operon. J. Bacteriol., 175, 1993. doi:10.1128/jb.175.17.5595-5603.1993

    work page doi:10.1128/jb.175.17.5595-5603.1993 1993

  21. [22]

    Z. A. King, A. Dräger, A. Ebrahim, N. Sonnenschein, N. E. Lewis, and B. O. Palsson. Escher: A web application for building, sharing, and embedding data-rich visualizations of biological pathways. PLOS Comput. Biol., 11: 0 1--13, 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004321

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004321 2015

  22. [23]

    Z. A. King, J. Lu, A. Dräger, P. Miller, S. Federowicz, J. A. Lerman, A. Ebrahim, B. O. Palsson, and N. E. Lewis. BiGG models: A platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models. Nucleic Acids Res., 44: 0 D515--D522, 2016. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1049

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1049 2016

  23. [24]

    K. R. Kjeldsen and J. Nielsen. In silico genome-scale reconstruction and validation of the Corynebacterium glutamicum metabolic network. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 102: 0 583--597, 2009. doi:10.1002/bit.22067

    work page doi:10.1002/bit.22067 2009

  24. [25]

    Kurpejović, B

    E. Kurpejović, B. Sariyar Akbulut, and F. G. Avci. Tailoring Corynebacterium glutamicum for sustainable biomanufacturing: From traditional to cutting-edge technologies. Mol. Biotechnol., 68: 0 1106--1126, 2025. doi:10.1007/s12033-025-01447-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s12033-025-01447-z 2025

  25. [26]

    Latour, D

    T. Latour, D. Strohmeier, M. Osthege, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. estim8 -- An FMI-compliant Python toolbox for bioprocess modeling and parameter estimation . J. Open Source Software, (submitted), unpublished

  26. [27]

    Le Gr \' e gam , Y

    L. Le Gr \' e gam , Y. Guitton, F. Bellvert, S. Heux, F. Jourdan, J.-C. Portais, and P. Millard. PhysioFit: A software to quantify cell growth parameters and extracellular fluxes . Bioinformatics, 40, 2024. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae488

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae488 2024

  27. [28]

    R. W. Leighty and M. R. Antoniewicz. COMPLETE-MFA: Complementary parallel labeling experiments technique for metabolic flux analysis . Metab. Eng., 20: 0 49--55, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2013.08.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2013.08.006 2013

  28. [29]

    J. Liu, X. Zhao, H. Cheng, Y. Guo, X. Ni, L. Wang, G. Sun, X. Wen, J. Chen, J. Wang, J. An, X. Guo, Z. Shi, H. Li, R. Wang, M. Zhao, X. Liao, Y. Wang, P. Zheng, M. Wang, and J. Sun. Comprehensive screening of industrially relevant components at genome scale using a high-quality gene overexpression collection of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Trends Biotechno...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.09.020 2025

  29. [30]

    C. P. Long and M. R. Antoniewicz. High-resolution 13 C metabolic flux analysis . Nat. Protoc., 14: 0 2856--2877, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41596-019-0204-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41596-019-0204-0 2019

  30. [31]

    Marienhagen

    J. Marienhagen. Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the synthesis of aromatic compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 109: 0 132, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00253-025-13520-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00253-025-13520-3 2025

  31. [32]

    u hr, W. Wiechert, and K. N \

    S. Niedenf \" u hr, W. Wiechert, and K. N \" o h. How to measure metabolic fluxes: A taxonomic guide for 13 C fluxomics . Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 34: 0 82--90, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.003 2015

  32. [33]

    u hr, A. ten Pierick, P. T. van Dam, C. A. Suarez-Mendez, K. N \

    S. Niedenf \" u hr, A. ten Pierick, P. T. van Dam, C. A. Suarez-Mendez, K. N \" o h, and S. A. Wahl. Natural isotope correction of MS/MS measurements for metabolomics and 13 C fluxomics . Biotechnol. Bioeng., 113: 0 1137--1147, 2016. doi:10.1002/bit.25859

    work page doi:10.1002/bit.25859 2016

  33. [34]

    J. Nielsen. It is all about metabolic fluxes . J. Bacteriol., 185: 0 7031--7035, 2003. doi:10.1128/JB.185.24.7031-7035.2003

    work page doi:10.1128/jb.185.24.7031-7035.2003 2003

  34. [35]

    Nießer, M

    J. Nießer, M. Osthege, E. von Lieres, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. PeakPerformance -- a tool for Bayesian inference-based fitting of LC-MS/MS peaks . J. Open Source Softw., 9: 0 7313, 2024. doi:10.21105/joss.07313

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07313 2024

  35. [36]

    Noack, R

    S. Noack, R. Voges, J. Gätgens, and W. Wiechert. The linkage between nutrient supply, intracellular enzyme abundances and bacterial growth: New evidences from the central carbon metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Biotechnol., 258: 0 13--24, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.407

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.407 2017

  36. [37]

    N \" o h and W

    K. N \" o h and W. Wiechert. The benefits of being transient: Isotope-based metabolic flux analysis at the short time scale . Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 91: 0 1247--1265, 2011. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3390-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3390-4 2011

  37. [38]

    N \" o h, S

    K. N \" o h, S. A. Wahl, and W. Wiechert. Computational tools for isotopically instationary 13 C labeling experiments under metabolic steady state conditions . Metab. Eng., 8: 0 554--577, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2006.05.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2006.05.006 2006

  38. [39]

    o h, K. Gr \

    K. N \" o h, K. Gr \" o nke, B. Luo, R. Takors, M. Oldiges, and W. Wiechert. Metabolic flux analysis at ultra short time scale: Isotopically non-stationary 13 C labeling experiments . J. Biotechnol., 129: 0 249--267, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.11.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.11.015 2007

  39. [40]

    Osthege, N

    M. Osthege, N. Tenhaef, R. Zyla, C. Müller, J. Hemmerich, W. Wiechert, S. Noack, and M. Oldiges. bletl -- a python package for integrating BioLector microcultivation devices in the design-build-test-learn cycle. Eng. Life Sci., 22: 0 242--259, 2022. doi:10.1002/elsc.202100108

    work page doi:10.1002/elsc.202100108 2022

  40. [41]

    Paczia, A

    N. Paczia, A. Nilgen, T. Lehmann, J. Gätgens, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. Extensive exometabolome analysis reveals extended overflow metabolism in various microorganisms. Microb. Cell Fact., 11: 0 122, 2012. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-11-122

    work page doi:10.1186/1475-2859-11-122 2012

  41. [42]

    R. D. Paul, J. F. Jadebeck, A. Stratmann, W. Wiechert, and K. Nöh. hopsy -- a methods marketplace for convex polytope sampling in P ython. Bioinformatics, 40, 2024. doi:10.1101/2023.12.22.573091

    work page doi:10.1101/2023.12.22.573091 2024

  42. [43]

    Rahim, M

    M. Rahim, M. Ragavan, S. Deja, M. E. Merritt, S. C. Burgess, and J. D. Young. INCA 2.0: A tool for integrated, dynamic modeling of NMR- and MS-based isotopomer measurements and rigorous metabolic flux analysis . Metab. Eng., 69: 0 275--285, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.12.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2021.12.009 2022

  43. [44]

    Reiter, L

    A. Reiter, L. Herbst, W. Wiechert, and M. Oldiges. Need for speed: E valuation of dilute and shoot-mass spectrometry for accelerated metabolic phenotyping in bioprocess development. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 413: 0 3253--3268, 2021. doi:10.1007/s00216-021-03261-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00216-021-03261-3 2021

  44. [45]

    T. M. Rosch, J. Tenhaef, T. Stoltmann, T. Redeker, D. Kösters, N. Hollmann, K. Krumbach, W. Wiechert, M. Bott, S. Matamouros, J. Marienhagen, and S. Noack. Autobiotech -- a versatile biofoundry for automated strain engineering. ACS Synth. Biol., 13: 0 2227--2237, 2024. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.4c00298

    work page doi:10.1021/acssynbio.4c00298 2024

  45. [46]

    U. Sauer. Metabolic networks in motion: 13 C-based flux analysis . Mol. Syst. Biol., 2: 0 62, 2006. doi:10.1038/msb4100109

    work page doi:10.1038/msb4100109 2006

  46. [47]

    Sokol, P

    S. Sokol, P. Millard, and J.-C. Portais. influx\_s: I ncreasing numerical stability and precision for metabolic flux analysis in isotope labelling experiments. Bioinformatics, 28: 0 687--693, 2012. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr716

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr716 2012

  47. [48]

    Stratmann, M

    A. Stratmann, M. Bey , J. F. Jadebeck, W. Wiechert, and K. N \" o h. 13CFLUX -- third-generation high-performance engine for isotopically (non)stationary 13 C metabolic flux analysis . Bioinformatics, 44, 2025. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf630

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf630 2025

  48. [49]

    Theorell, S

    A. Theorell, S. Leweke, W. Wiechert, and K. N \" o h. To be certain about the uncertainty: Bayesian statistics for ^ 13 C metabolic flux analysis . Biotechnol. Bioeng., 114: 0 2668--2684, 2017. doi:10.1002/bit.26379

    work page doi:10.1002/bit.26379 2017

  49. [50]

    Theorell, J

    A. Theorell, J. F. Jadebeck, W. Wiechert, J. McFadden, and K. Nöh. R ethinking 13 C-metabolic flux analysis – The Bayesian way of flux inference . Metab. Eng., 83: 0 137--149, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2024.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2024.03.005 2024

  50. [51]

    Tillack, N

    J. Tillack, N. Paczia, K. N\" o h, W. Wiechert, and S. Noack. Error propagation analysis for quantitative intracellular metabolomics. Metabolites, 2: 0 1012--30, 2012. doi:10.3390/metabo2041012

    work page doi:10.3390/metabo2041012 2012

  51. [52]

    Unthan, A

    S. Unthan, A. Radek, W. Wiechert, M. Oldiges, and S. Noack. Bioprocess automation on a Mini Pilot Plant enables fast quantitative microbial phenotyping. Microb. Cell Fact., 14: 0 32, 2015. doi:10.1186/s12934-015-0216-6

    work page doi:10.1186/s12934-015-0216-6 2015

  52. [53]

    W \"a chter and L

    A. W \"a chter and L. T. Biegler. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Program., 106: 0 25--57, 2006. doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y 2006

  53. [54]

    V. F. Wendisch, A. A. De Graaf, H. Sahm, and B. J. Eikmanns. Quantitative determination of metabolic fluxes during coutilization of two carbon sources: Comparative analyses with Corynebacterium glutamicum during growth on acetate and/or glucose. J. Bacteriol., 182: 0 3088–3096, 2000. doi:10.1128/jb.182.11.3088-3096.2000

    work page doi:10.1128/jb.182.11.3088-3096.2000 2000

  54. [55]

    Wiechert, L

    W. Wiechert, L. Helleckes, and K. N \" o h. Building trust in automated experimentation: Uncertainty quantification in the era of high-throughput biolabs. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 96: 0 1--9, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103382

    work page doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103382 2025

  55. [56]

    B. G. Wong, C. P. Mancuso, S. Kiriakov, C. J. Bashor, and A. S. Khalil. Precise, automated control of conditions for high-throughput growth of yeast and bacteria with eVOLVER . Nat. Biotechnol., 36: 0 614--623, 2018. doi:10.1038/nbt.4151

    work page doi:10.1038/nbt.4151 2018