pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26129 · v1 · pith:ENMB5MZVnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Unified Cosmological Scenario in Holographic f(Q) gravity: From Inflation to Late-Time Acceleration

Moli Ghosh , Can Aktas , Surajit Chattopadhyay This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 17:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords holographic f(Q) gravityunified cosmologyinflationlate-time accelerationBarrow holographic fluidHubble reconstructionMCMC constraintsCPL parametrization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Holographic f(Q) gravity with power-law form unifies inflation and late-time acceleration in one setup.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified model in holographic f(Q) gravity to describe the universe from its inflationary beginning to its current accelerated expansion. Using f(Q) = ζ Q^n and a Barrow holographic fluid, it reconstructs the Hubble parameter so that early-universe slow-roll parameters match Planck observations with a very small tensor-to-scalar ratio. The model then incorporates matter and uses the CPL parametrization to fit combined cosmic chronometer and baryon acoustic oscillation data through MCMC, showing compatibility with LambdaCDM at low redshifts. The approach tests whether one modified gravity setup can handle both epochs without separate dark energy components.

Core claim

In the holographic f(Q) gravity with f(Q) = ζ Q^n and Barrow holographic fluid, a reconstructed Hubble parameter satisfies Planck-consistent slow-roll parameters for inflation and, when extended with CPL parametrization and fitted to CC+BAO data, remains compatible with LambdaCDM at low redshifts while showing mild deviations at higher redshifts, as confirmed by AIC and BIC analysis.

What carries the argument

Reconstruction of the Hubble parameter using the Barrow holographic fluid in the f(Q) = ζ Q^n model, enabling both slow-roll inflation analysis and late-time observational fitting.

If this is right

  • Inflationary predictions match Planck 2018 with a very small tensor-to-scalar ratio.
  • MCMC-constrained parameters show the model remains compatible with LambdaCDM at low redshifts.
  • Mild deviations from LambdaCDM appear at higher redshifts.
  • AIC and BIC comparisons quantify the fit quality relative to LambdaCDM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a single reconstruction succeeds, it could reduce reliance on separate mechanisms for early and late acceleration in modified gravity theories.
  • High-redshift observations beyond current CC+BAO data could test whether the reported mild deviations persist or grow.
  • Replacing the Barrow cutoff with other holographic prescriptions would test whether the unified Hubble reconstruction remains viable.

Load-bearing premise

The specific choice f(Q) = ζ Q^n together with the Barrow holographic fluid density allows a single Hubble reconstruction to satisfy both the slow-roll conditions at early times and the CPL-fitted expansion at late times without additional ad-hoc adjustments.

What would settle it

Imposing the MCMC-fitted parameters from CC+BAO data on the early-time Hubble reconstruction and checking whether the resulting slow-roll parameters still lie inside Planck 2018 bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26129 by Can Aktas, Moli Ghosh, Surajit Chattopadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: spectral index versus tensor to scalar ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: This is the least square fitting for the holographic dark energy with CPL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: This is the MCMC analysis for the holographic dark energy with CPL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The present paper reports a study of a unified cosmological scenario in the framework of holographic f(Q) gravity, where, in a single theoretical setup, both the early inflationary epoch and the late-time accelerated epoch are studied. Considering f(Q) = $\zeta Q^n$, we reconstruct the Hubble parameter in the presence of Barrow holographic fluid and study the inflationary behaviour through the slow-roll parameters, scalar spectral index $n_s$, and tensor-to-scalar ratio r. The obtained inflationary predictions are found to be consistent with the latest Planck 2018 observational constraints, with a very small value of the tensor-to-scalar ratio. In the next phase, we extend the study by including the matter sector. The Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization is used to connect the theoretical model with observational cosmology. Using combined Cosmic Chronometer (CC) and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) datasets, the study constrains the model parameters through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis. From the observational results obtained this way, the study concludes that at low redshifts, the holographic f(Q) model considered here remains compatible with the standard LambdaCDM model, while mild deviations are observed at higher redshift. We have also performed the AIC and BIC analysis and commented on the goodness of fit in comparison with the LambdaCDM model. Hence, the present framework provides a viable unified description of inflation and late-time cosmic acceleration within holographic f(Q) gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a unified cosmological model in holographic f(Q) gravity using f(Q) = ζ Q^n together with a Barrow holographic fluid. It reconstructs the Hubble parameter separately for the inflationary epoch to compute slow-roll parameters, ns, and r (claimed consistent with Planck 2018), then extends the setup by adding a matter sector, adopts CPL parametrization (w0, wa), and performs MCMC constraints on combined CC+BAO data to assess late-time behavior and compare to ΛCDM via AIC/BIC.

Significance. If a single continuous Hubble evolution with fixed {ζ, n} were demonstrated to satisfy both slow-roll conditions at early times and the late-time data constraints without epoch-specific refitting, the work would provide a concrete example of modified gravity linking inflation and acceleration. The current presentation does not establish this continuity, limiting the significance to two decoupled reconstructions whose parameters overlap only by construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; reconstruction and MCMC paragraphs] Abstract and the paragraphs describing the reconstruction and MCMC step: the central claim of a 'unified scenario' with a single theoretical setup requires that the same fixed values of ζ and n (plus holographic constants) produce one continuous H(z) satisfying both the inflationary slow-roll conditions and the CPL-fitted late-time expansion. The manuscript instead describes two distinct phases—holographic-fluid reconstruction for inflation followed by an independent inclusion of the matter sector and MCMC fit on CC+BAO—which leaves open whether the Friedmann equations are solved from a single differential equation across all redshifts or separately per epoch with different effective fluids or boundary conditions. This directly affects the load-bearing claim of unification.
  2. [MCMC analysis section] MCMC analysis section: the model parameters (n, ζ, holographic constants, w0, wa) are fitted directly to the same CC+BAO datasets used to claim compatibility with ΛCDM. Without an explicit joint fit or a demonstration that the inflationary values of n and ζ remain unchanged when the late-time sector is added, the late-time 'predictions' reduce to the fitted values by construction, undermining the assertion of independent consistency checks.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Inflationary reconstruction] The manuscript provides no derivation details, error budgets, or explicit checks against post-hoc parameter choices for the inflationary reconstruction; adding these would strengthen the slow-roll and ns/r claims.
  2. [AIC/BIC analysis] AIC and BIC comparisons are reported but without tabulating the exact ΔAIC/ΔBIC values or the number of free parameters used in each model; this should be clarified for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The points raised correctly identify that our work performs separate epoch-specific reconstructions rather than a single continuous Hubble evolution with fixed parameters. We address each comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to clarify the scope of the claimed unification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; reconstruction and MCMC paragraphs] Abstract and the paragraphs describing the reconstruction and MCMC step: the central claim of a 'unified scenario' with a single theoretical setup requires that the same fixed values of ζ and n (plus holographic constants) produce one continuous H(z) satisfying both the inflationary slow-roll conditions and the CPL-fitted late-time expansion. The manuscript instead describes two distinct phases—holographic-fluid reconstruction for inflation followed by an independent inclusion of the matter sector and MCMC fit on CC+BAO—which leaves open whether the Friedmann equations are solved from a single differential equation across all redshifts or separately per epoch with different effective fluids or boundary conditions. This directly affects the load-bearing claim of unification.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the manuscript presents two distinct reconstructions within the f(Q) = ζ Q^n holographic framework: one for inflation using the Barrow holographic fluid to obtain slow-roll parameters, and a separate late-time analysis that includes the matter sector and employs CPL parametrization fitted via MCMC to CC+BAO data. No single continuous H(z) is solved across all redshifts with fixed {ζ, n}. The unification is limited to the common theoretical setup (same f(Q) form and holographic fluid) applied independently to each epoch. We will revise the abstract and relevant paragraphs to remove or qualify the 'unified scenario' phrasing and explicitly state that the analyses are epoch-specific rather than a joint continuous solution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [MCMC analysis section] MCMC analysis section: the model parameters (n, ζ, holographic constants, w0, wa) are fitted directly to the same CC+BAO datasets used to claim compatibility with ΛCDM. Without an explicit joint fit or a demonstration that the inflationary values of n and ζ remain unchanged when the late-time sector is added, the late-time 'predictions' reduce to the fitted values by construction, undermining the assertion of independent consistency checks.

    Authors: The referee is correct: the MCMC step fits n, ζ and the CPL parameters directly to the late-time CC+BAO data, so the late-time results are constrained by construction rather than serving as independent predictions from the inflationary values of n and ζ. No joint fit across epochs or fixed-parameter continuity is demonstrated. We will revise the MCMC section, results, and conclusions to clarify that the late-time constraints are independent fits within the model and that compatibility with ΛCDM is assessed from these fits, not as cross-epoch predictions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard reconstruction and fitting procedures

full rationale

The paper reconstructs the Hubble parameter from the Friedmann equations in holographic f(Q) gravity with f(Q)=ζQ^n and Barrow fluid for the inflationary phase, then computes slow-roll parameters, ns and r for comparison to Planck 2018. Separately, it includes the matter sector, adopts CPL parametrization, and performs MCMC fitting to CC+BAO data to constrain parameters and compare to ΛCDM via AIC/BIC. These steps derive H(z) and constraints from the model equations and independent datasets rather than presupposing the target results. No quoted reduction shows a 'prediction' equivalent to its inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citation chains, and no self-definitional loops. The unified claim rests on applying the same f(Q) form across epochs, which is an independent modeling choice evaluated against data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model depends on multiple free parameters chosen or fitted to data and on standard cosmological assumptions whose validity is taken as given.

free parameters (4)
  • exponent n
    Power in f(Q) = ζ Q^n; chosen to produce viable slow-roll and late-time behavior.
  • prefactor ζ
    Scale factor in the f(Q) function; adjusted to match observations.
  • Barrow holographic parameters
    Constants entering the holographic fluid density; fitted or chosen to close the equations.
  • CPL parameters w0, wa
    Dark-energy equation-of-state parameters; constrained by MCMC to CC+BAO data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption FLRW metric and standard Friedmann equations hold in f(Q) gravity
    Invoked when reconstructing the Hubble parameter from the modified gravity action.
  • domain assumption Barrow entropy correction applies to the holographic screen
    Used to define the holographic fluid density without independent derivation in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Barrow holographic fluid no independent evidence
    purpose: Source of dark energy that unifies early and late acceleration
    Postulated fluid whose density depends on the Hubble horizon and Barrow parameter; no independent falsifiable signature outside the fit is stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5811 in / 1664 out tokens · 39560 ms · 2026-06-30T17:32:46.351941+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular uni- verse

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov, “Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular uni- verse”.JETP Lett.33, 549-553 (1981)

    1981

  2. [2]

    Efficient computation of cosmic microwave background anisotropies in closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models.Astrophys

    Lewis, A.; Challinor, A.; and Lasenby, A. Efficient computation of cosmic microwave background anisotropies in closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models.Astrophys. J.,2000,538, 473. 19

    2000

  3. [3]

    The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration

    R.R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, “The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration”.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59, 397-429 (2009), doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-010709-151330, [arXiv:0903.0866 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-010709-151330 2009

  4. [4]

    The return of the cosmic constant

    R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, “The return of the cosmic constant”.Nature 458, 587-589 (2009), doi:10.1038/458587a

    work page doi:10.1038/458587a 2009

  5. [5]

    Dark Energy

    M. Li, X.D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, “Dark Energy”.Commun. Theor. Phys.56, 525-604 (2011), doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/3/24, [arXiv:1103.5870 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/3/24 2011

  6. [6]

    Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests

    K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, “Dark energy cosmol- ogy: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests”.Astrophys. Space Sci.342, 155-228 (2012), doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8, [arXiv:1205.3421 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8 2012

  7. [7]

    Dark Energy-Current Advances and Ideas

    F.S.N. Lobo, “Dark Energy-Current Advances and Ideas”. [arXiv:0807.1640 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    The Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy

    G. Gubitosi, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, “The Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy”.JCAP1302, 032 (2013), doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032, [arXiv:1210.0201 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032 2013

  9. [9]

    Dark Energy or Modified Gravity? An Effective Field Theory Approach

    J.K. Bloomfield, E.E. Flanagan, M. Park and S. Watson, “Dark energy or mod- ified gravity? An effective field theory approach”.JCAP1308, 010 (2013), doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/010, [arXiv:1211.7054 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/010 2013

  10. [10]

    Essential Building Blocks of Dark Energy

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, “Essential Building Blocks of Dark Energy”.JCAP1308, 025 (2013), doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/025, [arXiv:1304.4840 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/025 2013

  11. [11]

    Dark energy: A brief review

    M. Li, X.D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, “Dark energy: A brief review”.Front. Phys. 8(6), 828-846 (2013), doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0300-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0300-5 2013

  12. [12]

    Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models

    G. Olivares, F. Atrio-Barandela and D. Pavon, “Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models”.Phys. Rev. D71, 063523 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063523, [astro-ph/0503242]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.063523 2005

  13. [13]

    Curvature Quintessence

    S. Capozziello, “Curvature quintessence”.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11, 483-491 (2002), doi:10.1142/S0218271802002025, [gr-qc/0201033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271802002025 2002

  14. [14]

    The Cosmological Constant Problem and Quintessence

    V. Sahni, “The cosmological constant problem and quintessence”.Class. Quant. Grav.19, 3435-3448 (2002), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/13/304, [astro-ph/0202076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/13/304 2002

  15. [15]

    Curvature quintessence matched with observational data

    S. Capozziello, V.F. Cardone, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, “Curvature quintessence matched with observational data”.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D12, 1969-1982 (2003), doi:10.1142/S0218271803004407, [astro-ph/0307018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271803004407 1969

  16. [16]

    Quintessence and the Rest of the World

    S.M. Carroll, “Quintessence and the rest of the world”.Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3067- 3070 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3067, [astro-ph/9806099]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3067 1998

  17. [17]

    Cluster abundance constraints on quintessence models

    L.M. Wang and P.J. Steinhardt, “Cluster abundance constraints on quintessence models”.Astrophys. J.508, 483-490 (1998), doi:10.1086/306436, [astro- ph/9804015]. 20

    work page doi:10.1086/306436 1998

  18. [18]

    Inflationary Cosmology

    A.D. Linde, “Inflationary Cosmology”.Lect. Notes Phys.738, 1-54 (2008), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74353-8 1, [arXiv:0705.0164 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74353-8 2008

  19. [19]

    Particle Physics Models of Inflation and the Cosmological Density Perturbation

    D.H. Lyth and A. Riotto, “Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmo- logical density perturbation”.Phys. Rept.314, 1-146 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0370- 1573(98)00128-8, [hep-ph/9807278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370- 1999

  20. [20]

    Chaotic Inflation

    A.D. Linde, “Chaotic Inflation”.Phys. Lett. B129, 177-181 (1983), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 1983

  21. [21]

    Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories

    K. Bamba and S.D. Odintsov, “Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories”. Symmetry7(1), 220-240 (2015), doi:10.3390/sym7010220, [arXiv:1503.00442 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3390/sym7010220 2015

  22. [22]

    TASI Lectures on Inflation

    D. Baumann, “TASI Lectures on Inflation”. [arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Encyclopaedia Inflationaris

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, “Encyclopaedia Inflationaris”.Phys. Dark Univ.5–6, 75–235 (2014), doi:10.1016/j.dark.2014.01.003, [arXiv:1303.3787 [astro- ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2014.01.003 2014

  24. [24]

    Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation

    P.A.R. Adeet al. [Planck Collaboration], “Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation”.Astron. Astrophys.594, A20 (2016), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525898, [arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525898 2015

  25. [25]

    BICEP2 / Keck Array VI: Improved Constraints On Cosmology and Foregrounds When Adding 95 GHz Data From Keck Array

    P.A.R. Adeet al. [BICEP2 and Keck Array Collaborations], “Improved Constraints on Cosmology and Foregrounds from BICEP2 and Keck Array Cosmic Microwave Background Data with Inclusion of 95 GHz Band”.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 031302 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.031302, [arXiv:1510.09217 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.031302 2016

  26. [26]

    Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, “Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: Unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration”.Phys. Rev. D68, 123512 (2003), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123512, [hep-th/0307288]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.123512 2003

  27. [27]

    Inflation, dark matter and dark energy in the string landscape

    A.R. Liddle and L.A. Urena-Lopez, “Inflation, dark matter, and dark energy in the string landscape”.Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 161301 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.161301, [astro-ph/0605205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.161301 2006

  28. [28]

    Unifying phantom inflation with late-time acceleration: scalar phantom-non-phantom transition model and generalized holographic dark energy

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, “Unifying phantom inflation with late-time accelera- tion: scalar phantom–non-phantom transition model and generalized holographic dark energy”.Gen. Rel. Grav.38, 1285-1304 (2006), doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0301- 6, [hep-th/0506212]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0301- 2006

  29. [29]

    Some issues concerning holographic dark energy

    M. Li, C. Lin and Y. Wang, “Some issues concerning holographic dark energy”. JCAP0805, 023 (2008), doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/05/023

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/05/023 2008

  30. [30]

    Constraining slow-roll inflation in the pres- ence of dynamical dark energy

    J.Q. Xia and X. Zhang, “Constraining slow-roll inflation in the pres- ence of dynamical dark energy”.Phys. Lett. B660(4), 287-292 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.01.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.01.010 2008

  31. [31]

    Unifying inflation with dark energy in mod- ifiedF(R) Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, “Unifying inflation with dark energy in mod- ifiedF(R) Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity”.Eur. Phys. J. C70, 351–361 (2010), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1455-7. 21

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1455-7 2010

  32. [32]

    Inflation and dark energy from three-forms

    T.S. Koivisto and N.J. Nunes, “Inflation and dark energy from three-forms”.Phys. Rev. D80, 103509 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103509

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.103509 2009

  33. [33]

    Vector field models of inflation and dark energy

    T. Koivisto and D.F. Mota, “Vector field models of inflation and dark energy”. JCAP0808, 021 (2008), doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021 2008

  34. [34]

    Triple unification of inflation, dark matter, and dark energy using a single field

    A.R. Liddle, C. Pahud and L.A. Ure˜ na-Lopez, “Triple unification of inflation, dark matter, and dark energy using a single field”.Phys. Rev. D77, 121301(R) (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.121301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.121301 2008

  35. [35]

    Higgs dark energy

    M. Rinaldi, “Higgs dark energy”.Class. Quant. Grav.32, 045002 (2015), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/4/045002

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/4/045002 2015

  36. [36]

    Viable mimetic completion of uni- fied inflation-dark energy evolution in modified gravity

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, “Viable mimetic completion of uni- fied inflation-dark energy evolution in modified gravity”.Phys. Rev. D94, 104050 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104050

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.104050 2016

  37. [37]

    Dark energy model with spinor matter and its quintom scenario

    Y.-F. Cai and J. Wang, “Dark energy model with spinor matter and its quintom scenario”.Class. Quant. Grav.25, 165014 (2008), doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/25/16/165014

    work page doi:10.1088/0264- 2008

  38. [38]

    Teleparallel dark energy

    C.Q. Geng, C.C. Lee, E.N. Saridakis and Y.P. Wu, “Teleparallel dark energy”. Phys. Lett. B704(5), 384–387 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.082

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.082 2011

  39. [39]

    Equivalent off-diagonal cosmological models and ekpyrotic scenarios inf(R)-modified, massive, and Einstein gravity

    S.I. Vacaru, “Equivalent off-diagonal cosmological models and ekpyrotic scenarios inf(R)-modified, massive, and Einstein gravity”.Eur. Phys. J. C75, 176 (2015), doi:/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3407-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3407-8 2015

  40. [40]

    Violation of the Equivalence Principle in Modified Theories of Grav- ity

    G.J. Olmo, “Violation of the Equivalence Principle in Modified Theories of Grav- ity”.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 061101 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.061101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.061101 2007

  41. [41]

    Thermodynamic properties of modified gravity theories

    K. Bamba, “Thermodynamic properties of modified gravity theories”.Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.13(06), 1630007 (2016), doi:10.1142/S0219887816300075

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887816300075 2016

  42. [42]

    Thermodynamics in f(R, R αβ, Rαβ, ϕ) theory of gravity

    M. Zubair, F. Kousar and S. Bahamonde, “Thermodynamics in f(R, R αβ, Rαβ, ϕ) theory of gravity”.Phys. Dark Univ.14, 116–125 (2016), doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.10.001 2016

  43. [43]

    Unifying inflation with ΛCDM epoch in modified f(R) gravity consistent with Solar System tests

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, “Unifying inflation with ΛCDM epoch in modified f(R) gravity consistent with Solar System tests”.Phys. Lett. B657(4–5), 238–245 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.027 2007

  44. [44]

    The Gravity Lagrangian According to Solar System Experiments

    G.J. Olmo, “The Gravity Lagrangian According to Solar System Experiments”. Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 261102 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.261102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.261102 2005

  45. [45]

    Solar system experiments do not yet veto modified gravity models

    V. Faraoni, “Solar system experiments do not yet veto modified gravity models”. Phys. Rev. D74, 023529 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023529

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.023529 2006

  46. [46]

    Quintessential dark energy crossing the phantom divide,

    L. Iorio, “Solar system constraints on a Rindler-type extra-acceleration from modified gravity at large distances”.JCAP1105, 019 (2011), doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2011/05/019. 22

    work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2011

  47. [47]

    Constraining extended theories of gravity using Solar System tests

    G. Allemandi and M.L. Ruggiero, “Constraining extended theories of gravity using Solar System tests”.Gen. Rel. Grav.39, 1381–1388 (2007), doi:10.1007/s10714- 007-0441-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714- 2007

  48. [48]

    Behavior off(R) gravity in the solar system, galaxies, and clusters

    P. Zhang, “Behavior off(R) gravity in the solar system, galaxies, and clusters”. Phys. Rev. D76, 024007 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.024007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.024007 2007

  49. [49]

    Newtonian limit off(R) gravity

    S. Capozziello, A. Stabile and A. Troisi, “Newtonian limit off(R) gravity”.Phys. Rev. D76, 104019 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.104019 2007

  50. [50]

    Phase space geometry in scalar-tensor cosmology

    V. Faraoni, “Phase space geometry in scalar-tensor cosmology”.Ann. Phys.317(2), 366–382 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.11.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.11.009 2005

  51. [51]

    Late time phenomena inf(T,T) gravity frame- work: role ofH 0 priors,

    L.K. Duchaniya and B. Mishra, “Late time phenomena inf(T,T) gravity frame- work: role ofH 0 priors,”Eur. Phys. J. C85, 488 (2025), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 025-14187-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2025

  52. [52]

    Stability off(Q, B) Gravity via Dynamical System Approach: A Comprehensive Bayesian Statistical Analysis,

    S.V. Lohakare and B. Mishra, “Stability off(Q, B) Gravity via Dynamical System Approach: A Comprehensive Bayesian Statistical Analysis,”Astrophys. J.978, 26 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9602

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9602 2025

  53. [53]

    Modelling the accelerating universe withf(Q) gravity: observational consistency,

    S.A. Narawade, S.H. Shekh, B. Mishraet al., “Modelling the accelerating universe withf(Q) gravity: observational consistency,”Eur. Phys. J. C84, 773 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13150-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13150-5 2024

  54. [54]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity” (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9310026

    arXiv 1993

  55. [55]

    Effective Field Theory, Black Holes, and the Cosmological Constant

    A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, “Effective Field Theory, Black Holes, and the Cosmological Constant”.Phys. Rev. Lett.82(25), 4971–4974 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4971

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4971 1999

  56. [56]

    Kaniadakis Holographic Dark Energy Behavior in f(Q) Theory

    S. Kalkan and C. Akta¸ s, “Kaniadakis Holographic Dark Energy Behavior in f(Q) Theory”Fortschr. Phys.74, e70102 (2026). doi: 10.1002/prop.70102

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.70102 2026

  57. [57]

    Models of Holographic Dark Energy inf(Q) Gravity,

    S. H. Shekh, “Models of Holographic Dark Energy inf(Q) Gravity,”Phys. Dark Universe33, 100850 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2021.100850

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100850 2021

  58. [58]

    Barrow Holographic Dark Energy,

    E. N. Saridakis, “Barrow Holographic Dark Energy,”Phys. Rev. D102, 123525 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123525

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123525 2020

  59. [59]

    Interacting New Holographic Dark Energy Model with VaryingGin Nonflat Universe,

    V. Fayaz, F. Felegary, and H. Hossienkhani, “Interacting New Holographic Dark Energy Model with VaryingGin Nonflat Universe,”Can. J. Phys.91, 1084–1088 (2013). doi: 10.1139/cjp-2012-0503

    work page doi:10.1139/cjp-2012-0503 2013

  60. [60]

    Phase space of modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    S. Carloni and J.P. Mimoso, “Phase space of modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity”.Eur. Phys. J. C77, 547 (2017), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5110-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5110-4 2017

  61. [61]

    Holographic Dark Energy Models: A Comparison from the Latest Observational Data,

    M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Holographic Dark Energy Models: A Comparison from the Latest Observational Data,”J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.06, 036 (2009). doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/06/036. 23

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/06/036 2009

  62. [62]

    Saridakis, et.al.Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CAN- TATA Network, Springer (2021), doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83715-0

    E.N. Saridakis, et.al.Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CAN- TATA Network, Springer (2021), doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83715-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83715-0 2021

  63. [63]

    Metric-affine gauge the- ory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of di- lation invariance,

    F.W. Hehl, J.D. McCrea, E.W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman, “Metric-affine gauge the- ory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of di- lation invariance,”Phys. Rept.258, 1–171 (1995), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)00111- F

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)00111- 1995

  64. [64]

    Coincident general relativity,

    J.B. Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg, and T. Koivisto, “Coincident general relativity,”Phys. Rev. D98, 044048 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044048

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.044048 2018

  65. [65]

    Signatures off(Q) Gravity in Cosmology,

    N. Frusciante, “Signatures off(Q) Gravity in Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D103, 044021 (2021). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.044021 2021

  66. [66]

    Revisiting Cosmologies in Teleparal- lelism,

    F. D’Ambrosio, L. Heisenberg, and S. Kuhn, “Revisiting Cosmologies in Teleparal- lelism,”Class. Quantum Grav.39, 025013 (2022). doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac3f99

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac3f99 2022

  67. [67]

    The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity,

    J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg, and T. S. Koivisto, “The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity,”Universe5, 173 (2019). doi: 10.3390/universe5070173

    work page doi:10.3390/universe5070173 2019

  68. [68]

    Cosmology inf(Q) Geometry,

    J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg, T. Koivisto, and S. Pekar, “Cosmology inf(Q) Geometry,”Phys. Rev. D101, 103507 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.103507 2020

  69. [69]

    Noether Symmetries in Symmetric Teleparallel Cosmology,

    K. F. Dialektopoulos, T. S. Koivisto, and S. Capozziello, “Noether Symmetries in Symmetric Teleparallel Cosmology,”Eur. Phys. J. C79, 606 (2019). doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7106-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7106-8 2019

  70. [70]

    Dynamical System Analysis of Dirac-Born- Infeld Scalar Field Cosmology in Coincidentf(Q) Gravity,

    S. Ghosh, R. Solanki, and P. K. Sahoo, “Dynamical System Analysis of Dirac-Born- Infeld Scalar Field Cosmology in Coincidentf(Q) Gravity,”Chinese Phys. C48, 095102 (2024). doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad50aa

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad50aa 2024

  71. [71]

    Accelerating Universe Scenario in Anisotropicf(Q) Cosmology,

    M. Koussour and M. Bennai, “Accelerating Universe Scenario in Anisotropicf(Q) Cosmology,”Chinese J. Phys.79, 339–347 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2022.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2022.09.002 2022

  72. [72]

    An Investigation of Inflationary and Bounce Cosmology within the Context off(Q) Gravity,

    M. Ghosh and S. Chattopadhyay, “An Investigation of Inflationary and Bounce Cosmology within the Context off(Q) Gravity,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2450084 (2024). doi: 10.1142/S0217751X24500842

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x24500842 2024

  73. [73]

    Dynamical System Analysis of Scalar Field Cosmology in Coincidentf(Q) Gravity,

    S. Ghosh, R. Solanki, and P. K. Sahoo, “Dynamical System Analysis of Scalar Field Cosmology in Coincidentf(Q) Gravity,”Phys. Scr.99, 055021 (2024). doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad39b5

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad39b5 2024

  74. [74]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind, “The World as a Hologram”.J. Math. Phys.36, 6377 (1995). doi: 10.1063/1.531249

    work page doi:10.1063/1.531249 1995

  75. [75]

    Detecting Dark Matter-Dark Energy Coupling with the Halo Mass Function

    P. M. Sutter, P. M. Ricker, “Detecting Dark Matter-Dark Energy Coupling with the Halo Mass Function”.Astrophys. J.687, 7–11 (2008). doi: 10.1086/592036

    work page doi:10.1086/592036 2008

  76. [76]

    A Cosmological Holographic Reconstruction off(Q) The- ory,

    P. Saha and P. Rudra, “A Cosmological Holographic Reconstruction off(Q) The- ory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34, 2550006 (2025). doi: 10.1142/S0218271825500063

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271825500063 2025

  77. [77]

    Domain Wall and Holographic Dark Energy inf(Q) Theory of Gravity,

    S. P. Hatkar, D. P. Tadas, and S. D. Katore, “Domain Wall and Holographic Dark Energy inf(Q) Theory of Gravity,”Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.21, 2440033 (2024). doi: 10.1142/S0219887824400334 24

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887824400334 2024

  78. [78]

    Study of Cosmological Dark Energy Models underf(Q) Gravity,

    V. C. Dubey, U. K. Sharma, S. Ray, and A. Sanyal, “Study of Cosmological Dark Energy Models underf(Q) Gravity,”Phys. Dark Universe47, 101736 (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101736

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101736 2025

  79. [79]

    Warm Inflation Triggered by Entropies of Some Recent Dark Energy Models withinf(Q) Gravity,

    R. Saleem, M. H. Rasool, M. I. Aslam, and I. Shahid, “Warm Inflation Triggered by Entropies of Some Recent Dark Energy Models withinf(Q) Gravity,”Chinese Phys. C48, 125102 (2024). doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad654e

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad654e 2024

  80. [80]

    A model of holographic dark energy

    M. Li, “A model of holographic dark energy”.Phys. Lett. B603(1), 1–5 (2004), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.10.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.10.014 2004

Showing first 80 references.