pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26245 · v1 · pith:5HLZBVSYnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Preparing thermal states of frustrated quantum spin systems using 139 qubits

Roland C. Farrell , Yongtao Zhan , Lucas Katschke , Lode Pollet , Ilan T. Rosen , Jad C. Halimeh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords thermal state preparationdissipative quantum simulationkagome latticefrustrated spin systemsquantum computingantiferromagnetic Ising modelfinite temperature
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dissipative coupling prepares approximate thermal states of up to 79-spin kagome antiferromagnets using 139 qubits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates preparation of approximate thermal states for frustrated spin systems by coupling system spins on the kagome lattice to environment qubits that induce dissipation. On IBM processors this yields a robust steady state with tunable effective temperature for the antiferromagnetic Ising model, stable through circuits with more than 1000 layers of two-qubit gates. Classical simulations of the protocol on both Ising and Heisenberg models show that the depth needed to reach equilibrium remains independent of system size up to 24 sites and grows at most linearly with inverse temperature. The approach targets finite-temperature properties that classical methods cannot access due to sign problems.

Core claim

Approximate thermal states of the antiferromagnetic Ising model on kagome lattices are prepared on IBM quantum processors by coupling up to 79 system spins to 60 environment qubits, resulting in a robust steady state with adjustable effective temperature that persists through circuits with over 1000 layers of two-qubit gates. Classical simulations of the protocol for both the Ising and Heisenberg models on lattices up to 24 sites show that the circuit depth to reach equilibrium is independent of system size and grows at most linearly with inverse temperature.

What carries the argument

engineered dissipation via coupling system spins to environment qubits that drives the system toward a tunable thermal steady state

If this is right

  • Approximate thermal states for the AFIM benchmark become accessible on present-day quantum hardware with 139 qubits.
  • Circuit depth to equilibrium does not grow with system size for lattices up to 24 sites.
  • The same protocol applies in principle to the AFHM whose finite-temperature behavior is inaccessible to quantum Monte Carlo.
  • Engineered dissipation offers a route to finite-temperature simulation of frustrated matter beyond classical reach.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Validation against exact thermal states on small lattices would allow scaling studies of temperature-driven phase transitions in frustrated magnets.
  • Lower effective temperatures might be reachable by combining the dissipation protocol with variational optimization of the initial state.
  • Size-independent depth suggests the method remains practical as qubit counts increase.

Load-bearing premise

The observed steady state matches the local properties of a true thermal state at the claimed effective temperature rather than reflecting hardware noise or incomplete thermalization.

What would settle it

For a small kagome AFIM instance where exact thermal averages are computable, measure the prepared state's energy or spin correlations and verify agreement with the Boltzmann distribution at the claimed temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26245 by Ilan T. Rosen, Jad C. Halimeh, Lode Pollet, Lucas Katschke, Roland C. Farrell, Yongtao Zhan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Matrix elements of the jump operators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The partitioning of the links on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The energy density as a function of the number of resets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The mixed state fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Left: a) Trotterized time evolution under the AFIM on the kagome lattice requires [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Numerical simulation of dissipative ground-state preparation for the one-dimensional transverse-field Ising model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Scaling of the steady-state energy error with the number of environment qubits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The pairing of system (white) and environment (black) qubits on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. a) The entries in the reset confusion matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The energy densities measured on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The spatially resolved magnetization (left) and triangle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Kagome lattices with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Left: Comparison of the rate of convergence to the exact thermal state with a range of inverse temperatures between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. The convergence in the energy density on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Left: All degenerate ground states and 3 of the degenerate first excited states of a classical Ising model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. The spatial distribution of the magnetization (left) and connected triangle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Finite-temperature properties of strongly correlated quantum matter are central to condensed matter, chemistry, and high-energy physics, yet are often inaccessible to classical methods such as quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). Here, we investigate dissipative thermal state preparation of frustrated spin systems using digital quantum computers. We focus on two paradigmatic models on the kagome lattice: the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model (AFHM), whose finite-temperature properties are inaccessible to QMC due to a severe sign problem, and the antiferromagnetic Ising model (AFIM), which serves as a sign-problem-free benchmark. Using IBM quantum processors, we prepare approximate thermal states of the AFIM on kagome lattices with up to $79$ spins coupled to $60$ environment qubits. We observe the emergence of a robust steady state with an adjustable effective temperature that persists in circuits with over 1000 layers of two-qubit gates. We further study the scalability of the dissipative protocol through classical statevector simulations of the AFIM and AFHM. On lattices with up to 24 sites, we find that the circuit depth to reach thermal equilibrium is independent of system size and grows at most linearly with inverse temperature. These results establish engineered dissipation as a promising approach to finite-temperature quantum simulation of frustrated matter, and point toward regimes where quantum devices may outperform classical methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a dissipative protocol can prepare approximate thermal states of frustrated spin systems on the kagome lattice. On IBM hardware they realize this for the antiferromagnetic Ising model (AFIM) with up to 79 system spins coupled to 60 environment qubits (139 total), producing a robust steady state whose effective temperature can be adjusted and that survives circuits exceeding 1000 layers of two-qubit gates. Statevector simulations up to 24 sites for both AFIM and the sign-problematic antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model (AFHM) show that the depth required to reach equilibrium is independent of system size and grows at most linearly with inverse temperature.

Significance. If the prepared states are shown to be close to Gibbs states at the reported effective temperatures, the work supplies a concrete route to finite-temperature properties of sign-problematic models that are inaccessible to quantum Monte Carlo. The 139-qubit hardware demonstration and the size-independent depth scaling (at most linear in 1/T) are genuine strengths that could enable quantum devices to reach regimes where classical methods fail. The explicit scaling result for both models is a clear, falsifiable contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental results on AFIM] Experimental AFIM results: the claim that the observed steady state is an approximate thermal state at an adjustable effective temperature is load-bearing. The manuscript must supply quantitative metrics (e.g., deviation of energy, specific heat, or correlation functions from exact thermal values) for the largest (79-spin) instances; without these, it remains possible that the steady state is a non-thermal attractor shaped by hardware noise rather than the target Gibbs state.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and methods: the procedure used to extract and tune the effective temperature should be stated explicitly, including which observables are fitted and the fitting tolerance.
  2. [Simulation results] Simulation section: the precise system sizes, number of independent runs, and the functional form of the observed depth-vs-1/T scaling for the AFHM should be tabulated or plotted with error bars.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental results on AFIM] Experimental AFIM results: the claim that the observed steady state is an approximate thermal state at an adjustable effective temperature is load-bearing. The manuscript must supply quantitative metrics (e.g., deviation of energy, specific heat, or correlation functions from exact thermal values) for the largest (79-spin) instances; without these, it remains possible that the steady state is a non-thermal attractor shaped by hardware noise rather than the target Gibbs state.

    Authors: We agree that direct quantitative comparison to exact thermal expectations would strengthen the interpretation. However, exact thermal properties for a 79-spin system are computationally intractable, requiring summation over an exponential number of configurations (2^79). This intractability is the regime the method targets. For the AFIM we have instead validated the protocol via statevector simulations on systems up to 24 sites, where exact comparisons are feasible and confirm that the dissipative dynamics reach the target Gibbs state with depth independent of system size. On hardware, the 79-spin steady state is shown to be robust (persisting beyond 1000 two-qubit layers), independent of initial conditions, and tunable in effective temperature via the engineered dissipation parameters, consistent with the theoretical analysis of the protocol. We will revise the manuscript to expand the discussion of these supporting lines of evidence and to explicitly note the absence of exact benchmarks at the largest size. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Supplying quantitative metrics comparing observables to exact thermal values for the 79-spin hardware instances, as exact computation is intractable at this scale.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental observations from IBM quantum processors (up to 79+60 qubits) showing emergence of adjustable-temperature steady states, plus classical statevector simulations (up to 24 sites) confirming size-independent depth scaling linear in 1/T. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes imported from prior author work; the protocol is validated against external benchmarks via hardware runs and sign-problem-free comparisons rather than internal redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no specific free parameters or invented entities; relies on established quantum computing concepts.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and open quantum system dynamics
    Underlying the dissipative protocol.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 1110 out tokens · 32861 ms · 2026-06-29T21:20:45.624710+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    QbNhQ5WJ0eFBv0c6UqymbSdole0=

    the dynamics generated byLis rapidly mixing, i.e., for any initial stateρ, ∥etL(ρ)−ρ ∞∥1 ≤C e −γt poly(NS),(D12) with constantsC, γ >0independent of system sizeN S. Let ˜L=L+Ebe a perturbation ofLby local termsE= P x Ex where each local perturbation has strength∥E x∥ ≤p 1. and let˜ρ∞ denote the steady state of ˜L. Then for any local observableO A supporte...

    1910

  2. [2]

    mqy0RXK30FvfXpLsx14LtLwNGCI=

    Reset-error adjustedβ ∗ One source of error comes from imperfect qubit reset. We will show that this changes the local temperature of each environment qubit resulting in a reset-error adjustedβ ∗ that is lower than the targetβ. Define confusion matrices ˆXR and ˆXM that relate the input ⃗Iand output ⃗Oprobability distributions after reset and measurement ...

  3. [3]

    Zero noise extrapolation The final step of our error mitigation pipeline is Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE) [101, 102], which was also used for circuits with mid-circuit measurements in Ref. [103]. In our implementation, we apply a transformation pass that 23 FIG. 14. The energy densities measured onibm bostonforβ=∞and system sizesN S = 12 (left),N S = 18 ...

  4. [4]

    Laermann and O

    E. Laermann and O. Philipsen, Lattice qcd at finite temperature, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science53, 163 (2003)

    2003

  5. [5]

    Philipsen, Lattice qcd at finite temperature and den- sity, The European Physical Journal Special Topics152, 29 (2007)

    O. Philipsen, Lattice qcd at finite temperature and den- sity, The European Physical Journal Special Topics152, 29 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    N. D. Mermin, Thermal properties of the inhomoge- neous electron gas, Phys. Rev.137, A1441 (1965)

    1965

  7. [7]

    Bonitz, T

    M. Bonitz, T. Dornheim, Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Zhang, P. Hamann, H. K¨ ahlert, A. Filinov, K. Ramakrishna, and J. Vorberger, Ab initio simulation of warm dense matter, Physics of Plasmas27, 042710 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aal3837

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aal3837 2017

  10. [10]

    Evolution of Entanglement Entropy in One-Dimensional Systems

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, Evolution of entangle- ment entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech. 0504, P04010 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0503393

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [12]

    R. P. Feynman, Quantum mechanical computers, Found. Phys.16, 507 (1986)

    1986

  12. [13]

    Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    1996

  13. [14]

    Bertini, F

    B. Bertini, F. Heidrich-Meisner, C. Karrasch, T. Prosen, R. Steinigeweg, and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Finite-temperature transport in one-dimensional quantum lattice models, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 025003 (2021)

    2021

  14. [15]

    McArdle, S

    S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry, Re- views of Modern Physics92, 015003 (2020)

    2020

  15. [16]

    von Burg, G

    V. von Burg, G. H. Low, T. H¨ aner, D. S. Steiger, M. Rei- her, M. Roetteler, and M. Troyer, Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis, Physical Review Re- search3, 033055 (2021)

    2021

  16. [17]

    Tsutsui, M

    S. Tsutsui, M. Hongo, S. Sato, and T. Sagawa, Quantum hydrodynamics from local thermal pure states, Phys. 29 Rev. Res.4, 033059 (2022)

    2022

  17. [18]

    Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complex- ity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 170201 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0408370

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [19]

    Lacroix, P

    C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila,Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism, Vol. 164 (Springer, 2011)

    2011

  19. [20]

    E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Sign problem in the numerical simulation of many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B41, 9301 (1990)

    1990

  20. [21]

    Nagata, Finite-density lattice QCD and sign prob- lem: Current status and open problems, Prog

    K. Nagata, Finite-density lattice QCD and sign prob- lem: Current status and open problems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127, 103991 (2022), arXiv:2108.12423 [hep- lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [22]

    J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bu- lik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Fer- rero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jim´ enez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.-W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B.-X. Zheng, Z. Zhu, and E. Gull (Simons Collaboratio...

    2015

  22. [23]

    Stephanov, QCD critical point: Recent de- velopments, EPJ Web Conf.314, 00042 (2024), arXiv:2410.02861 [nucl-th]

    M. Stephanov, QCD critical point: Recent de- velopments, EPJ Web Conf.314, 00042 (2024), arXiv:2410.02861 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 056902 (2018), arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [25]

    Z. Ding, Y. Zhan, J. Preskill, and L. Lin, End-to-End Efficient Quantum Thermal and Ground State Prepara- tion Made Simple (2025), arXiv:2508.05703 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    Jiang and S

    J. Jiang and S. Irani, Quantum metropolis sampling via weak measurement, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16023 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [27]

    C.-F. Chen, M. Kastoryano, F. G. Brand˜ ao, and A. Gily´ en, Efficient quantum thermal simulation, Na- ture646, 561 (2025)

    2025

  27. [28]

    C.-F. Chen, M. J. Kastoryano, F. G. Brand˜ ao, and A. Gily´ en, Quantum thermal state preparation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18224 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [29]

    D. Hahn, S. Parameswaran, and B. Placke, Towards effi- cient quantum thermal state preparation via local driv- ing: Lindbladian simulation with provable guarantees, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22816 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [30]

    Lloyd and D

    J. Lloyd and D. A. Abanin, Quantum thermal state preparation for near-term quantum processors (2025), arXiv:2506.21318 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    H. Chen, Z. Ding, and R. Zhang, Overcoming the lamb shift in system-bath models via kms detailed balance: High-accuracy thermalization with time-bounded inter- actions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15616 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [32]

    Consiglio, Variational quantum algorithms for gibbs state preparation, inInternational Conference on Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms (Springer, 2023) pp

    M. Consiglio, Variational quantum algorithms for gibbs state preparation, inInternational Conference on Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms (Springer, 2023) pp. 56–70

    2023

  32. [33]

    R.-H. Li, S. Valgushev, and K. Najafi, Variational Thermal State Preparation on Digital Quantum Pro- cessors Assisted by Matrix Product States (2025), arXiv:2510.23546 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Motta, C

    M. Motta, C. Sun, A. T. Tan, M. J. O’Rourke, E. Ye, A. J. Minnich, F. G. Brandao, and G. K.-L. Chan, De- termining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Na- ture Physics16, 205 (2020)

    2020

  34. [35]

    Sampling from the thermal quantum Gibbs state and evaluating partition functions with a quantum computer

    D. Poulin and P. Wocjan, Sampling from the Thermal Quantum Gibbs State and Evaluating Partition Func- tions with a Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 220502 (2009), arXiv:0905.2199 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [36]

    Thermalization in Nature and on a Quantum Computer

    A. Riera, C. Gogolin, and J. Eisert, Thermalization in Nature and on a Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 080402 (2012), arXiv:1102.2389 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [37]

    A Quantum-Quantum Metropolis Algorithm

    M.-H. Yung and A. Aspuru-Guzik, A quan- tum–quantum Metropolis algorithm, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.109, 754 (2012), arXiv:1011.1468 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  37. [38]

    Quantum Metropolis Sampling

    K. Temme, T. J. Osborne, K. G. Vollbrecht, D. Poulin, and F. Verstraete, Quantum Metropolis Sampling, Na- ture471, 87 (2011), arXiv:0911.3635 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [39]

    C.-F. Chen, M. J. Kastoryano, and A. Gily´ en, An ef- ficient and exact noncommutative quantum gibbs sam- pler, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09207 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [40]

    Miet al., Stable quantum-correlated many-body states through engineered dissipation, Science383, adh9932 (2024), arXiv:2304.13878 [quant-ph]

    X. Miet al., Stable quantum-correlated many-body states through engineered dissipation, Science383, adh9932 (2024), arXiv:2304.13878 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [41]

    Brunner, L

    E. Brunner, L. Coopmans, G. Matos, M. Rosenkranz, F. Sauvage, and Y. Kikuchi, Lindblad engineering for quantum Gibbs state preparation under the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Quantum9, 1843 (2025), arXiv:2412.17706 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    J. Z. Song, G. Kishony, E. Berg, and M. S. Rudner, Vari-Cool: a non-unitary quantum variational protocol for simulated cooling (2025), arXiv:2510.09749 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, R. N. Tazhigulov, A. T. Tan, G. K.-L. Chan, and A. J. Minnich, Quantum compu- tation of finite-temperature static and dynamical prop- erties of spin systems using quantum imaginary time evolution, PRX Quantum2, 010317 (2021)

    2021

  43. [44]

    Consiglio, J

    M. Consiglio, J. Settino, A. Giordano, C. Mastroianni, F. Plastina, S. Lorenzo, S. Maniscalco, J. Goold, and T. J. G. Apollaro, Variational gibbs state preparation on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012445 (2024)

    2024

  44. [45]

    Adiabatic preparation of thermal states and entropy-noise relation on noisy quantum computers

    E. Granet and H. Dreyer, Adiabatic preparation of ther- mal states and entropy-noise relation on noisy quantum computers (2025), arXiv:2509.05206 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    Robertson, M

    R. Robertson, M. Consiglio, J. Stevens, E. Doucet, T. J. G. Apollaro, and S. Deffner, Variational Gibbs State Preparation on Trapped-Ion Devices (2026), arXiv:2603.03801 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [47]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  47. [48]

    Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 10.1103/revmodphys.88.041002 (2016)

    M. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 10.1103/revmodphys.88.041002 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.041002 2016

  48. [49]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg Anti- ferromagnet, Science332, 1173 (2011), arXiv:1011.6114 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [51]

    Duric, J

    T. Duric, J. H. Chung, B. Yang, and P. Sengupta, Spin- 30 1/2 kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet: Machine learn- ing discovery of the spinon pair-density-wave ground state, Phys. Rev. X15, 011047 (2025)

    2025

  50. [52]

    Sun, H.-K

    R.-Y. Sun, H.-K. Jin, H.-H. Tu, and Y. Zhou, Possible chiral spin liquid state in the s=1/2 kagome heisenberg model, npj Quantum Materials9, 10.1038/s41535-024- 00627-5 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-024- 2024

  51. [53]

    Narasimhan, S

    P. Narasimhan, S. Humeniuk, A. Roy, and V. Drouin- Touchette, Simulating the transverse-field Ising model on the kagome lattice using a programmable quan- tum annealer, Phys. Rev. B110, 054432 (2024), arXiv:2310.06698 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [54]

    M. J. Kastoryano and K. Temme, Quantum logarith- mic sobolev inequalities and rapid mixing, Journal of Mathematical Physics54, 052202 (2013)

    2013

  53. [55]

    Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Rapid quantum ground state prepara- tion via dissipative dynamics, Phys. Rev. X16, 011004 (2026)

    2026

  54. [56]

    L. P. Hughston, R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters, A com- plete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix, Physics Letters A183, 14 (1993)

    1993

  55. [57]

    Shtanko and R

    O. Shtanko and R. Movassagh, Preparing thermal states on noiseless and noisy programmable quantum proces- sors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14688 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [58]

    Hagan and N

    M. Hagan and N. Wiebe, The thermodynamic cost of ignorance: Thermal state preparation with one ancilla qubit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03410 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [59]

    Rouz´ e, D

    C. Rouz´ e, D. S. Fran¸ ca, and´A. M. Alhambra, Efficient thermalization and universal quantum computing with quantum gibbs samplers, inProceedings of the 57th An- nual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing(2025) pp. 1488–1495

    2025

  58. [60]

    Rouz´ e, D

    C. Rouz´ e, D. Stilck Fran¸ ca, and´A. M. Alhambra, Op- timal quantum algorithm for gibbs state preparation, Physical Review Letters136, 060601 (2026)

    2026

  59. [61]

    Bergamaschi and C.-F

    T. Bergamaschi and C.-F. Chen, Quantum spin chains thermalize at all temperatures, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08533 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [62]

    Tong and Y

    Y. Tong and Y. Zhan, Fast mixing of weakly interacting fermionic systems at any temperature, PRX Quantum 6, 030301 (2025)

    2025

  61. [63]

    ˇSm´ ıd, R

    ˇS. ˇSm´ ıd, R. Meister, M. Berta, and R. Bondesan, Polynomial-time quantum gibbs sampling for the weak and strong coupling regime of the fermi-hubbard model at any temperature, Nature Communications16, 10736 (2025)

    2025

  62. [64]

    Rapid Mixing of Quantum Gibbs Samplers for Weakly-Interacting Quantum Systems

    ˇS. ˇSm´ ıd, R. Meister, M. Berta, and R. Bondesan, Rapid Mixing of Quantum Gibbs Samplers for Weakly- Interacting Quantum Systems (2025), arXiv:2510.04954 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [65]

    Bakshi, A

    A. Bakshi, A. Liu, A. Moitra, and E. Tang, High- temperature gibbs states are unentangled and efficiently preparable, in2024 IEEE 65th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)(IEEE, 2024) pp. 1027–1036

    2024

  64. [66]

    Kuwahara, A

    T. Kuwahara, A. M. Alhambra, and A. Anshu, Im- proved thermal area law and quasilinear time algorithm for quantum gibbs states, Phys. Rev. X11, 011047 (2021)

    2021

  65. [67]

    H. Chen, C. Rouz´ e, J. Chen, J. Jiang, S. O. Scalet, Y. Zhan, G. K. Chan, L. Ying, and Y. Tong, Con- vergence of the cumulant expansion and polynomial- time algorithm for weakly interacting fermions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12010 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [68]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Two- dimensional periodic frustrated ising models in a trans- verse field, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4457 (2000)

    2000

  67. [69]

    Pscherer, M

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Ising models of quan- tum frustration, Physical Review B63, 10.1103/phys- revb.63.224401 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2001

  68. [70]

    Kreißelet al., in preparation

    T. Kreißelet al., in preparation

  69. [71]

    First excitations of the spin 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagom\'e lattice

    C. Waldtmann, H.-U. Everts, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, P. Lecheminant, and L. Pierre, First ex- citations of the spin 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagom´ e lattice, European Physical Journal B2, 501 (1998), arXiv:cond-mat/9802168 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  70. [72]

    H. Nakano, Numerical-Diagonalization Study of Spin Gap Issue of the Kagome Lattice Heisenberg Antifer- romagnet, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan80, 053704 (2011), arXiv:1103.5829 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  71. [73]

    Lee and R

    M. Lee and R. C. Farrell, Studying energy-resolved transport with wavepacket dynamics on quantum com- puters (2026), arXiv:2601.16180 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  72. [74]

    Shinjo, K

    K. Shinjo, K. Seki, and S. Yunoki, Emergent Dis- crete Time Crystals on Digital Quantum Comput- ers: Boundary-Protected and Ancilla-Induced Disor- der Mechanisms of Thermalization Slowdown (2025), arXiv:2510.13577 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [75]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Sav- age, Quantum simulations of hadron dynamics in the Schwinger model using 112 qubits, Phys. Rev. D109, 114510 (2024), arXiv:2401.08044 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [76]

    J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compil- ing, Phys. Rev. A94, 052325 (2016), arXiv:1512.01098 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [77]

    E. v. d. Berg, Z. K. Minev, A. Kandala, and K. Temme, Probabilistic error cancellation with sparse Pauli–Lindblad models on noisy quantum processors, Nature Phys.19, 1116 (2023), arXiv:2201.09866 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [78]

    E. H. Chen, S. Chen, L. E. Fischer, A. Eddins, L. C. G. Govia, B. Mitchell, A. He, Y. Kim, L. Jiang, and A. Seif, Disambiguating Pauli noise in quantum com- puters (2025), arXiv:2505.22629 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [79]

    Katschke, R

    L. Katschke, R. C. Farrell, U. Borla, L. Pollet, and J. C. Halimeh, Finite-Temperature Dynamical Phase Diagram of the 2 + 1D Quantum Ising Model (2026), arXiv:2602.16772 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  78. [80]

    Wang and Z

    K. Wang and Z. Ding, Beyond lindblad dynamics: Rig- orous guarantees for thermal and ground state preser- vation under system bath interactions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03457 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [81]

    H.-E. Li, Y. Zhan, and L. Lin, Dissipative ground state preparation in ab initio electronic structure theory, npj Quantum Information11, 183 (2025)

    2025

  80. [82]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phase di- agram of the hexagonal lattice quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. B64, 144416 (2001)

    2001

Showing first 80 references.