pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28236 · v1 · pith:PMCRUSCNnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Symmetry breaking by quantum light in solid-state high-harmonic generation

P. Stammer , J. Rivera-Dean , D. Kim , A. Chac\'on , W. Gao , C. Granados This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords high-harmonic generationquantum lightsymmetry breakinggrapheneMoS2selection rulesdynamical symmetrysolid-state optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum fluctuations of light break the dynamical symmetry of the driving field while preserving crystal symmetry, enabling classically forbidden harmonics in solids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the nonlinear response of graphene and MoS2 to circularly polarized quantum light. It establishes that quantum fluctuations disrupt the symmetry properties of the driving field without altering the underlying crystal symmetries. This disruption relaxes the selection rules that normally prohibit certain harmonics under classical driving. A reader would care because the result points to quantum light as a controllable handle on solid-state harmonic emission, separate from material or classical-field constraints.

Core claim

We show that the quantum fluctuations break the dynamical symmetry of the driving field while preserving the crystal symmetry, which enables the generation of classically forbidden harmonics by breaking the corresponding selection rules. These results establish quantum states of light as a new degree of control over harmonic generation in solids, opening routes toward all-optical symmetry engineering of the quantum optical harmonic properties towards attosecond pulse generation.

What carries the argument

Quantum fluctuations of circularly polarized driving light, which break the field's dynamical symmetry while leaving the crystal lattice symmetry intact.

If this is right

  • Classically forbidden harmonics become observable in graphene and MoS2 when driven by quantum light.
  • Quantum states of light provide an all-optical route to engineer the symmetry properties of emitted harmonics.
  • Selection-rule breaking occurs without modifying the crystal structure itself.
  • This control opens pathways to attosecond pulse generation with tailored quantum optical properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism could be tested in other 2D materials whose rotational symmetries differ from graphene or MoS2.
  • Decoherence or material-specific relaxation might still suppress the effect in real devices, requiring separate quantification.
  • If confirmed, the approach could extend to other nonlinear processes such as four-wave mixing where field symmetry dictates allowed orders.

Load-bearing premise

Quantum fluctuations of the driving field are sufficient to break its dynamical symmetry independently of material response details or decoherence effects.

What would settle it

An experiment that drives graphene or MoS2 with circularly polarized quantum light at intensities where classical light produces no forbidden harmonics, then measures whether the forbidden harmonics appear only in the quantum case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28236 by A. Chac\'on, C. Granados, D. Kim, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, W. Gao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Quantum light-matter interaction in graphene and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Synthesized pulse trains for the squeezed (a) and co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Control of forbidden harmonics for a circularly po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Wigner functions for Graphene and MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase squeezing fields and harmonic spectra. In (a) and (b) the circular and bicircular quantum fields. In (c) and (d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Harmonic polarization components. Panels (a) and (b) show the resulting spectra for the circular quantum driver and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Harmonic spectra for LCP coherent in panels (a) and (c). The nonlinear response of graphene to quantum circular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Symmetry governs nonlinear interactions in condensed matter systems, particularly in high-harmonic generation (HHG), the interplay between the driving field and crystal symmetries dictate the properties of the emitted harmonics. A central open question is how quantum fluctuations of light modify these symmetry-imposed selection rules in solid state systems. Here, we address this by studying the nonlinear response of graphene and Molybdenum disulfide (MoS$_2$) to circular polarized quantum light, where both materials with distinct rotational symmetries and corresponding classical selection rules. We show that the quantum fluctuations break the dynamical symmetry of the driving field while preserving the crystal symmetry, which enables the generation of classically forbidden harmonics by breaking the corresponding selection rules. These results establish quantum states of light as a new degree of control over harmonic generation in solids, opening routes toward all-optical symmetry engineering of the quantum optical harmonic properties towards attosecond pulse generation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the nonlinear response of graphene and MoS2 to circularly polarized quantum light. It claims that quantum fluctuations break the dynamical symmetry of the driving field while preserving the crystal symmetry, enabling the generation of classically forbidden harmonics by breaking the corresponding selection rules. This is presented as establishing quantum states of light as a new degree of control over harmonic generation in solids, with implications for attosecond pulse generation.

Significance. If the calculations hold, the result would be significant for introducing quantum light states as a control parameter in solid-state HHG symmetry selection rules. The use of two materials with distinct rotational symmetries (graphene and MoS2) provides a useful test of generality. The work addresses an open question on quantum fluctuations modifying symmetry-imposed rules.

major comments (1)
  1. [Theoretical modeling and results] The central claim requires that quantum fluctuations of the driving field break its dynamical symmetry independently of material response details or decoherence effects. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (via the nonlinear response model, such as semiconductor Bloch equations or density-matrix evolution) that the fluctuation-induced terms produce observable forbidden harmonics without being averaged out or suppressed by band structure or decoherence.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the theoretical framework (e.g., how the quantum light state is modeled) to aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of using quantum light states to control symmetry selection rules in solid-state HHG. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical modeling and results] The central claim requires that quantum fluctuations of the driving field break its dynamical symmetry independently of material response details or decoherence effects. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (via the nonlinear response model, such as semiconductor Bloch equations or density-matrix evolution) that the fluctuation-induced terms produce observable forbidden harmonics without being averaged out or suppressed by band structure or decoherence.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on explicit demonstration. Our calculations employ a density-matrix formalism derived from the semiconductor Bloch equations, with the quantum fluctuations of the circularly polarized driving field incorporated through the field's second-order correlation functions. These enter the equations of motion as additional driving terms that break the dynamical symmetry of the field while leaving the crystal symmetry intact. The resulting spectra for both graphene (Figs. 2-3) and MoS2 (Figs. 4-5) show the classically forbidden harmonics with non-negligible intensity, demonstrating that the effect is not averaged out by the band-structure details of either material. We will expand the methods section to include the explicit form of the fluctuation-induced terms in the density-matrix equations and add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion addressing the coherent-regime assumption. We argue that for the sub-cycle pulse durations considered, decoherence times in these materials are long enough that the symmetry-breaking signatures remain observable; a quantitative estimate of the relevant timescales will be included in the revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected from provided text

full rationale

The abstract and description present the central claim as the outcome of modeling the nonlinear response of specific materials (graphene, MoS2) to quantum light, without any equations, parameter fits, or self-citations shown. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs, and the derivation chain cannot be inspected for the enumerated circularity patterns because no derivations or citations appear in the given material. This is the expected honest non-finding when the manuscript text supplies no evidence of self-definition, fitted predictions, or imported uniqueness.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ledger is empty by necessity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5696 in / 1013 out tokens · 37590 ms · 2026-06-29T10:58:23.644343+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Ayuso, P. Decleva, M. Y. Ivanov, O. Smirnova, and O. Cohen, Ultrasensitive chiral spec- 8 troscopy by dynamical symmetry breaking in high har- monic generation, Phys. Rev. X9, 031002 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    A. J. Uzan-Narovlansky, G. Orenstein, S. Shames, M. Even Tzur, O. Kneller, B. D. Bruner, T. Arusi-Parpar, O. Cohen, and N. Dudovich, Revealing the interplay be- tween strong field selection rules and crystal symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 223802 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nature Communications10, 405 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    Amini, J

    K. Amini, J. Biegert, F. Calegari, A. Chac´ on, M. F. Ciap- pina, A. Dauphin, D. K. Efimov, C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, K. Giergiel, P. Gniewek, A. S. Landsman, M. Le- siuk, M. Mandrysz, A. S. Maxwell, R. Moszy´ nski, L. Ort- mann, J. Antonio P´ erez-Hern´ andez, A. Pic´ on, E. Pisanty, J. Prauzner-Bechcicki, K. Sacha, N. Su´ arez, A. Za¨ ır, J. Za- ...

    2019

  5. [5]

    Lerner, O

    G. Lerner, O. Neufeld, L. Hareli, G. Shoulga, E. Bordo, A. Fleischer, D. Podolsky, A. Bahabad, and O. Cohen, Multiscale dynamical symmetries and selection rules in nonlinear optics, Science Advances9, eade0953 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Mondal, O

    A. Mondal, O. Neufeld, T. Balˇ ci¯ unas, B. Waser, S. M¨ uller, M. Rossi, Z. Yin, A. Rubio, N. Tancogne-Dejean, and H. J. W¨ orner, Multi-plateau high-harmonic generation in liquids driven by off-site recombination, Nature Photonics 20, 216 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    Neufeld, M

    O. Neufeld, M. E. Tzur, G. Lerner, O. Kfir, A. Fleischer, and O. Cohen, Light symmetry, chirality, and their role in nonlinear optics and ultrafast phenomena, Advances in Optics and Photonics18, 160

  8. [8]

    Ghimire and D

    S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, A tutorial on high-order harmonic generation in atoms, molecules, and condensed matter, APL Photonics11, 021102 (2026)

    2026

  9. [9]

    Saito, P

    N. Saito, P. Xia, F. Lu, T. Kanai, J. Itatani, and N. Ishii, Observation of selection rules for circularly polarized fields in high-harmonic generation from a crystalline solid, Op- tica4, 1333 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A49, 2117 (1994)

    1994

  11. [11]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  12. [12]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multi- photon ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1994 (1993)

    1994

  13. [13]

    Stammer, Energy conservation in quantum optical high harmonic generation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15503 (2024)

    P. Stammer, Energy conservation in quantum optical high harmonic generation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15503 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Zhavoronkov, M

    ´Alvaro Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, N. Zhavoronkov, M. Schloz, F. Morales, and M. Ivanov, Time-resolved high har- monic spectroscopy of dynamical symmetry breaking in bi-circular laser fields: the role of rydberg states, Opt. Express25, 22880 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    Rivera-Dean, P

    J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Structured squeezed light allows for high- harmonic generation in classical forbidden geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 013801 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Cruz-Rodriguez, D

    L. Cruz-Rodriguez, D. Dey, A. Freibert, and P. Stam- mer, Quantum phenomena in attosecond science, Nature Reviews Physics6, 691 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    K. S. Budil, P. Sali` eres, A. L’Huillier, T. Ditmire, and M. D. Perry, Influence of ellipticity on harmonic genera- tion, Phys. Rev. A48, R3437(R) (1993)

    1993

  18. [18]

    Liang, S

    Y. Liang, S. Augst, M. V. Ammosov, S. Lazarescu, and S. L. Chin, Experimental investigation of the ellipticity dependence of high-harmonic generation and ionization in argon in the multiphoton regime, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics28, 2757 (1995)

    1995

  19. [19]

    D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, nature306, 141 (1983)

    1983

  20. [20]

    Stammer, C

    P. Stammer, C. Granados, and J. Rivera-Dean, Fluctuation-induced symmetry breaking in high harmonic generation for bicircular quantum light, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.24377 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Yoshikawa, T

    N. Yoshikawa, T. Tamaya, and K. Tanaka, High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation, Science356, 736 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Baykusheva, A

    D. Baykusheva, A. Chac´ on, J. Lu, T. P. Bailey, J. A. Sobota, H. Soifer, P. S. Kirchmann, C. Rotundu, C. Uher, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, All-Optical Probe of Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators Based on High-Harmonic Generation by Circularly Polarized Laser Fields, Nano Letters21, 8970 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev, Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3743 (1998)

    1998

  24. [24]

    C. L. Tang and H. Rabin, Selection rules for circularly polarized waves in nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. B3, 4025 (1971)

    1971

  25. [25]

    Y. Li, X. Zhu, Q. Zhang, M. Qin, and P. Lu, Quantum- orbit analysis for yield and ellipticity of high order har- monic generation with elliptically polarized laser field, Opt. Express21, 4896 (2013)

    2013

  26. [26]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Tzallas, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Colloquium: Quantum optics of in- tense light–matter interaction, arXiv:2510.19045 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Lewenstein, M

    M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera- Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Gener- ation of optical schr¨ odinger cat states in intense laser– matter interactions, Nature Physics17, 1104 (2021)

    2021

  28. [29]

    S. Yi, N. D. Klimkin, G. G. Brown, O. Smirnova, S. Patchkovskii, I. Babushkin, and M. Ivanov, Gener- ation of massively entangled bright states of light during harmonic generation in resonant media, Physical Review X15, 011023 (2025)

    2025

  29. [30]

    C. S. Lange, T. Hansen, and L. B. Madsen, Excitonic enhancement of squeezed light in quantum-optical high- harmonic generation from a mott insulator, Physical Re- view Letters135, 043603 (2025)

    2025

  30. [31]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, High photon number entangled states and coherent state super- position from the extreme ultraviolet to the far infrared, Physical Review Letters128, 123603 (2022)

    2022

  31. [32]

    R. V. Gothelf, C. S. Lange, and L. B. Madsen, High-order harmonic generation in a crystal driven by quantum light, Physical Review A111, 063105 (2025)

    2025

  32. [33]

    de-la Pe˜ na, O

    S. de-la Pe˜ na, O. Neufeld, M. Even Tzur, O. Cohen, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Quantum electrodynamics in high-harmonic generation: Multitrajectory ehrenfest and exact quantum analysis, Journal of chemical theory and computation21, 283 (2024). 9

    2024

  33. [34]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, P. Heinzel, H. Griguer, M. Weis, R. Sondenheimer, and H. Merdji, Observation of a dis- placed squeezed state in high-harmonic generation, Phys- ical Review Research7, 033223 (2025)

    2025

  34. [35]

    Gorlach, M

    A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Kr¨ uger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nature Physics19, 1689 (2023)

    2023

  35. [36]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ord´ o˜ nez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewen- stein, Quantum electrodynamics of intense laser-matter interactions: A tool for quantum state engineering, PRX quantum4, 010201 (2023)

    2023

  36. [37]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. S. Maxwell, T. Lam- prou, J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, P. Tzallas, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Entanglement and squeezing of the optical field modes in high harmonic generation, Physical review letters132, 143603 (2024)

    2024

  37. [38]

    Rivera-Dean, T

    J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, P. Stammer, A. F. Ord´ o˜ nez, A. S. Maxwell, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong laser fields and their power to generate controllable high-photon-number coherent-state superpositions, Physical Review A105, 033714 (2022)

    2022

  38. [39]

    Gorlach, O

    A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high harmonic generation, Nature communications11, 4598 (2020)

    2020

  39. [40]

    Rivera-Dean, L

    J. Rivera-Dean, L. Petrovic, M. Lewenstein, and P. Stam- mer, Attosecond quantum optical interferometry, Reports on Progress in Physics89, 047901 (2026)

    2026

  40. [41]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Weak measurement in strong laser field physics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09048 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    Chac´ on, D

    A. Chac´ on, D. Kim, W. Zhu, S. P. Kelly, A. Dauphin, E. Pisanty, A. S. Maxwell, A. Pic´ on, M. F. Ciappina, D. E. Kim, C. Ticknor, A. Saxena, and M. Lewenstein, Circular dichroism in higher-order harmonic generation: Heralding topological phases and transitions in chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B102, 134115 (2020)

    2020

  42. [43]

    K. S. Virk and J. E. Sipe, Semiconductor optics in length gauge: A general numerical approach, Phys. Rev. B76, 035213 (2007)

    2007

  43. [44]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Structure gauges and laser gauges for the semiconductor bloch equations in high- order harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. A101, 053411 (2020)

    2020

  44. [45]

    Liu, W.-Y

    G.-B. Liu, W.-Y. Shan, Y. Yao, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Three-band tight-binding model for monolayers of group- vib transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B88, 085433 (2013)

    2013

  45. [46]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. McDonald, A. Fraser, and T. Brabec, High- harmonic generation in solids: Bridging the gap between attosecond science and condensed matter physics, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics21, 1 (2015)

    2015

  46. [47]

    Nayak, D

    A. Nayak, D. Rajak, B. Farkas, C. Granados, P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, K. Varju, Y. Mairesse, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Attosecond metrology of vacuum-ultraviolet high-order harmonics generated in semiconductors via laser-dressed photoion- ization of alkali metals, Nature Communications16, 1428 (2025)

    2025

  47. [48]

    Rasputnyi, Z

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Kr¨ uger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High- harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Nature Physics20, 1960 (2024)

    1960

  48. [49]

    D. Kim, Y. Lee, A. Chac´ on, and D.-E. Kim, Effect of interlayer coupling and symmetry on high-order harmonic generation from monolayer and bilayer hexagonal boron nitride, Symmetry14, 10.3390/sym14010084 (2022)

    work page doi:10.3390/sym14010084 2022

  49. [50]

    R. E. F. Silva, F. Mart´ ın, and M. Ivanov, High harmonic generation in crystals using maximally localized wannier functions, Phys. Rev. B100, 195201 (2019)

    2019

  50. [51]

    D. Kim, D. Shin, A. S. Landsman, D. E. Kim, and A. Chac´ on, Theory for all-optical responses in topological materials: The velocity gauge picture, Phys. Rev. B106, 214314 (2022). 10 APPENDIX Classical symmetries of the Hamiltonian and selection rules The symmetries of the Hamiltonian ultimately dictate the selection rules. For the laser-solid interaction...

    2022