pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28248 · v1 · pith:C6TFUCGHnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Using the Pericentre Precession of LAGEOS II to Constrain Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter

Clare Burrage , Angus Macdonald , Elisa Todarello This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords ultralight dark matterquadratic couplingsfifth forcespericentre precessionLAGEOS IIsatellite orbitsdark matter constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

LAGEOS II pericentre precession data constrains the mass and quadratic couplings of ultralight dark matter scalars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that ultralight scalars with quadratic couplings to Standard Model fields mediate fifth forces between ordinary matter, and these forces produce an additional pericentre precession in the orbits of Earth satellites. The authors apply the effect to the measured precession rate of LAGEOS II to derive limits on the scalar mass and its coupling strengths to light fields. This method remains effective at strong couplings, a regime where laboratory and other satellite bounds lose sensitivity. A reader would care because the approach turns an existing high-precision orbital measurement into a new probe of dark matter models.

Core claim

Quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter scalars acquire an effective mass near Earth and mediate fifth forces that shift the pericentre precession rate of satellite orbits; the observed precession of LAGEOS II therefore bounds the scalar mass and its quadratic couplings to Standard Model fields, with particular power in the strong-coupling region inaccessible to other experiments.

What carries the argument

The fifth force generated by the quadratic scalar coupling, which produces a position-dependent effective potential between test masses and thereby an orbital pericentre precession term.

If this is right

  • The same orbital precession effect supplies upper bounds on the scalar mass and its quadratic couplings to photons, electrons, and nucleons.
  • The constraints remain valid in the strong-coupling regime where laboratory experiments and other satellite searches lose sensitivity.
  • The scalar also induces effective shifts in fundamental constants, although the orbital analysis focuses on the force rather than the shifts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fifth-force signature could be searched for in the orbits of other geodetic satellites or in lunar laser ranging if comparable precession precision is available.
  • In regions of higher dark-matter density the effective mass of the scalar would change, potentially altering the precession signal for orbits around denser bodies.

Load-bearing premise

The measured pericentre precession of LAGEOS II can be treated as an upper limit on any fifth-force contribution without dominant contamination from other unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

A refined analysis of LAGEOS II data that accounts for all known gravitational and non-gravitational effects and finds a residual pericentre precession rate inconsistent with the range predicted by the quadratic scalar model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28248 by Angus Macdonald, Clare Burrage, Elisa Todarello.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Constraints on the mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The quantities in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The effect of accounting for the Earth’s non-trivial density structure - here exemplified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Deviation of the field profile around a spheroidal Earth, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The ratio of the average value of the field gradient in the presence of a dark matter wind, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The ensemble-averaged field-squared profile around the Earth - excluding the field profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It has been proposed that feebly interacting ultralight scalars may constitute the dark matter content of the universe. Models describing the interactions of a dark matter scalar with Standard Model fields may feature quadratic interactions at leading order, such that the scalar acquires an effective mass in the neighbourhood of a classical matter distribution. The effect of their introduction is to provide effective shifts in fundamental constants of physics, as well as to mediate scalar fifth forces between test bodies. We here demonstrate how these fifth forces can result in pericentre precession in the orbital motion of satellites around the Earth. We apply this to the measured pericentre precession of the LAGEOS II experiment, constraining the mass, and couplings to the light Standard Model fields, of a quadratically coupled ultra-light dark matter scalar. We observe such an experiment to be effective in constraining parameter space at strong couplings, where existing constraints from satellite and tabletop level experiments break down.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter scalars induce effective fifth forces that lead to pericentre precession in satellite orbits around Earth. It applies this to the measured pericentre precession of LAGEOS II to derive constraints on the scalar mass and its quadratic couplings to Standard Model fields, claiming sensitivity at strong couplings where other experiments are less effective.

Significance. Should the attribution of the LAGEOS II precession residual to the scalar fifth force hold after proper accounting for systematics, this would represent a useful extension of constraints on ultralight dark matter into a new parameter regime. The use of existing precision orbital data is an efficient way to probe these models.

major comments (1)
  1. [Application to LAGEOS II] The central claim requires that the measured pericentre precession residual is dominated by the fifth force from the quadratic scalar rather than unmodeled effects. The manuscript does not provide a quantified error budget or detailed subtraction procedure for contributions from tides, drag, and higher multipoles, making it impossible to assess whether the bound is robust. This is load-bearing for the constraint.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract mentions 'strong couplings' but a precise definition or comparison to existing bounds would clarify the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's potential significance. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion of the error budget.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Application to LAGEOS II] The central claim requires that the measured pericentre precession residual is dominated by the fifth force from the quadratic scalar rather than unmodeled effects. The manuscript does not provide a quantified error budget or detailed subtraction procedure for contributions from tides, drag, and higher multipoles, making it impossible to assess whether the bound is robust. This is load-bearing for the constraint.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantified error budget strengthens the robustness of the constraint and that the current manuscript would benefit from additional detail on this point. The pericentre precession residual we employ is taken from published LAGEOS II analyses in which known contributions from tides, atmospheric drag, and higher gravitational multipoles have already been modeled and subtracted. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph summarizing the dominant systematic terms, their estimated magnitudes, and the resulting uncertainty on the residual, with references to the original LAGEOS II papers. This addition will make the attribution to a possible fifth force more transparent while leaving the derived bounds unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard model-to-data constraint using external LAGEOS II measurement

full rationale

The paper derives the fifth-force-induced pericentre precession from the quadratic scalar coupling via the modified effective potential and orbital equations, then compares the resulting precession rate to the independently measured residual from the LAGEOS II experiment to bound the scalar mass and couplings. This is a conventional forward calculation followed by an external-data constraint; no step reduces the output bounds to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central result, and the derivation does not rename or smuggle in prior ansatze. The abstract and described approach treat the observed precession as an external input, making the analysis self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the model assumption that quadratic couplings produce an effective mass and a fifth force whose orbital effect can be isolated in LAGEOS II data; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quadratic interactions of an ultralight scalar with Standard Model fields produce an effective mass near matter and mediate a scalar fifth force
    Stated as the leading-order feature of the models under consideration.
invented entities (1)
  • quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter scalar no independent evidence
    purpose: Constitute dark matter and generate the fifth force affecting satellite orbits
    The entity whose mass and couplings are being constrained; no independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5696 in / 1349 out tokens · 35416 ms · 2026-06-29T11:56:38.273244+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Background-Induced Forces from Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Earth screening of quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter produces a multi-band frequency structure in the induced force whose sideband amplitudes vary annually, enabling improved constraints from MICROSCOPE and...

  2. Macroscopic Quantum Interference in Dark Matter Wave Scattering with MICROSCOPE

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nested cylinders in MICROSCOPE act as a dark-matter-wave interferometer, producing rotation-modulated signals that yield leading constraints on quadratic DM-nucleon couplings for masses 10^{-3}--10^{-2} eV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Around a Uniform Sphere 8

  2. [2]

    Solutions in Binary Systems 10 IV

    Around a Layered Sphere 9 C. Solutions in Binary Systems 10 IV. Scalar-Induced Orbital Precession in Newtonian Gravity 11 V. Results 13 VI. Approximations 17 A. Modelling LAGEOS II 18 B. Validity of the Linearised Force Approximation 18 C. Earth’s Internal Structure 19 D. Earth’s Oblateness 20

  3. [3]

    Earth as an oblate spheroid 20

  4. [4]

    Approximating Solutions for Small Eccentricities 21

  5. [5]

    Laser Geodynamic Satellite-2

    The Impact of Earth’s Non-Sphericity 22 E. Dark Matter Wind 24 VII. Conclusions 27 Acknowledgements 28 Data Availability Statement 29 References 29 A. Linearised Field Coefficients 33 B. Oblate Solutions 34 3 C. Dark Matter Wind Effects: Computation 35 4 I. INTRODUCTION It is currently understood that an undetected Dark Matter constitutes approximately 25...

  6. [6]

    (7) with this matter density - requiring field continuity and differentiability, and using Eq

    Around a Uniform Sphere The simplest body around which we may determine field solutions is a sphere of radiusR S and constant densityρ S, giving a density profile: ρ(x) =ρ SΘ(RS −r).(11) The scalar profile around this source mass is then determined by solving Eq. (7) with this matter density - requiring field continuity and differentiability, and using Eq...

  7. [7]

    LAGEOS II has a brass core 1 surrounded by an aluminium shell, whilst Earth’s structure may be broadly divided into an iron-dominated core and silicate mantle

    Around a Layered Sphere Whilst the simplicity of the preceding solutions may make describing both the Earth and LA- GEOS II as uniform spheres appealing, we can more accurately approximate each as having a layered structure. LAGEOS II has a brass core 1 surrounded by an aluminium shell, whilst Earth’s structure may be broadly divided into an iron-dominate...

  8. [8]

    21 (a) (b) FIG

    Earth as an oblate spheroid Considering a polar co-ordinate system centred on the Earth, we define its surface: R⊕(θ) = a⊕ q 1−e 2 ⊕ q (1−e 2 ⊕) +e 2 ⊕ cos2 θ ,(40) equivalent to tracing an ellipse with semi-major axisa ⊕, eccentricitye ⊕, and semi-minor axis: b⊕ =a ⊕ q 1−e 2 ⊕ .(41) We parameterise the Earth as having an eccentricity:e ⊕ = 0.0818 [57]. 2...

  9. [9]

    7 must obey: ∇2φ=α ⊕ρ(r, θ)φ(r, θ) (42) 22 whereρ(r, θ) =ρ ⊕Θ(R⊕(θ)−r) defines the density profile for the oblate Earth

    Approximating Solutions for Small Eccentricities Splittingϕ(⃗ r, t) =ϕ∞ cos(mt)φ(r, θ), field solutions to Eq. 7 must obey: ∇2φ=α ⊕ρ(r, θ)φ(r, θ) (42) 22 whereρ(r, θ) =ρ ⊕Θ(R⊕(θ)−r) defines the density profile for the oblate Earth. This can be separated into an interior and exterior solution: φ(r, θ) =    X n AOb n in(k⊕r)Pn(cosθ)r < R ⊕(θ) 1 + X...

  10. [10]

    bow-shock

    The Impact of Earth’s Non-Sphericity To determine the deviation between the oblate and spherical solutions, we consider the quantity: ϵ(θ) = φ(r= 1.9R ⊕, θ;e=e ⊕) φ(r= 1.9R ⊕, θ;e= 0) −1 (44) Where 1.9R⊕ is the approximate orbital altitude of the LAGEOS II satellite,e=e ⊕ indicates the scalar profile about an oblate spheroid Earth, ande= 0 indicates the p...

    2024

  11. [11]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2018

  12. [12]

    Cold and fuzzy dark matter.Phys

    Wayne Hu, Rennan Barkana, and Andrei Gruzinov. Cold and fuzzy dark matter.Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:1158–1161, 2000

    2000

  13. [13]

    Wave Dark Matter.Ann

    Lam Hui. Wave Dark Matter.Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 59:247–289, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Antypas et al

    D. Antypas et al. New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter. 3 2022

    2022

  15. [15]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons.Phys

    Frank Wilczek. Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 40:279–282, 1978

    1978

  16. [16]

    A New Light Boson?Phys

    Steven Weinberg. A New Light Boson?Phys. Rev. Lett., 40:223–226, 1978

    1978

  17. [17]

    P. Sikivie. Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion.Phys. Rev. Lett., 51:1415–1417, 1983. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    1983

  18. [18]

    Damour and Alexander M

    T. Damour and Alexander M. Polyakov. String theory and gravity.Gen. Rel. Grav., 26:1171–1176, 1994

    1994

  19. [19]

    Damour and Alexander M

    T. Damour and Alexander M. Polyakov. The String dilaton and a least coupling principle.Nucl. Phys. B, 423:532–558, 1994

    1994

  20. [20]

    Kaplan and Mark B

    David B. Kaplan and Mark B. Wise. Couplings of a light dilaton and violations of the equivalence principle.JHEP, 08:037, 2000

    2000

  21. [21]

    Conlon, Anshuman Maharana, Susha Parameswaran, Fernando Quevedo, and Ivonne Zavala

    Michele Cicoli, Joseph P. Conlon, Anshuman Maharana, Susha Parameswaran, Fernando Quevedo, and Ivonne Zavala. String cosmology: From the early universe to today.Phys. Rept., 1059:1–155, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    McDonald

    J. McDonald. Dark matter from an oscillating Brans-Dicke scalar in the extended inflation model. Phys. Rev. D, 44:2325, 1991. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 45, 1433 (1992)]

    1991

  23. [23]

    Can a Brans-Dicke scalar account for dark matter in extended inflation models?Phys

    John McDonald. Can a Brans-Dicke scalar account for dark matter in extended inflation models?Phys. Rev. D, 48:2462–2476, 1993

    1993

  24. [24]

    Copeland, Peter Millington, and Michael Spannowsky

    Clare Burrage, Edmund J. Copeland, Peter Millington, and Michael Spannowsky. Fifth forces, Higgs portals and broken scale invariance.JCAP, 11:036, 2018. 30

    2018

  25. [25]

    Ferreira, Antonio Padilla, and Constantinos Skordis

    Timothy Clifton, Pedro G. Ferreira, Antonio Padilla, and Constantinos Skordis. Modified Gravity and Cosmology.Phys. Rept., 513:1–189, 2012

    2012

  26. [26]

    Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model.Phys

    Austin Joyce, Bhuvnesh Jain, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden. Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model.Phys. Rept., 568:1–98, 2015

    2015

  27. [27]

    A. K. Drukier, Katherine Freese, and D. N. Spergel. Detecting Cold Dark Matter Candidates.Phys. Rev. D, 33:3495–3508, 1986

    1986

  28. [28]

    Elisa G. M. Ferreira. Ultra-light dark matter.Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 29(1):7, 2021

    2021

  29. [29]

    Donoghue

    Thibault Damour and John F. Donoghue. Equivalence Principle Violations and Couplings of a Light Dilaton.Phys. Rev. D, 82:084033, 2010

    2010

  30. [30]

    Donoghue

    Thibault Damour and John F. Donoghue. Phenomenology of the Equivalence Principle with Light Scalars.Class. Quant. Grav., 27:202001, 2010

    2010

  31. [31]

    MICROSCOPE Mission: First Results of a Space Test of the Equivalence Principle.Phys

    Pierre Touboul et al. MICROSCOPE Mission: First Results of a Space Test of the Equivalence Principle.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(23):231101, 2017

    2017

  32. [32]

    Space test of the Equivalence Principle: first results of the MICROSCOPE mission.Class

    Pierre Touboul et al. Space test of the Equivalence Principle: first results of the MICROSCOPE mission.Class. Quant. Grav., 36(22):225006, 2019

    2019

  33. [33]

    A Nuclear Interferometer for Ultra-Light Dark Matter Detection

    Hannah Banks, Elina Fuchs, and Matthew McCullough. A Nuclear Interferometer for Ultra-Light Dark Matter Detection. 7 2024

    2024

  34. [34]

    Searching for Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Clocks in Low Earth Orbit

    Dawid Brzeminski and Aaron Pierce. Searching for Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Clocks in Low Earth Orbit. 1 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    Caddell, Dhruv Jani, Martin Steinel, Leonardo Giani, Nils Huntemann, and Benjamin M

    Melina Filzinger, Ashlee R. Caddell, Dhruv Jani, Martin Steinel, Leonardo Giani, Nils Huntemann, and Benjamin M. Roberts. Ultralight Dark Matter Search with Space-Time Separated Atomic Clocks and Cavities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134(3):031001, 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Derevianko and M

    A. Derevianko and M. Pospelov. Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks.Nature Phys., 10:933, 2014

    2014

  37. [37]

    Stephan Schlamminger, K. Y. Choi, T. A. Wagner, J. H. Gundlach, and E. G. Adelberger. Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:041101, 2008

    2008

  38. [38]

    T. A. Wagner, S. Schlamminger, J. H. Gundlach, and E. G. Adelberger. Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle.Class. Quant. Grav., 29:184002, 2012

    2012

  39. [39]

    Detect- ing meV-scale dark matter via coherent scattering with an asymmetric torsion balance.Phys

    Pengshun Luo, Shigeki Matsumoto, Jie Sheng, Chuan-Yang Xing, Lin Zhu, and Zhi-Jie Zhuge. Detect- ing meV-scale dark matter via coherent scattering with an asymmetric torsion balance.Phys. Rev. D, 112(7):075023, 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100).Quantum Sci

    Mahiro Abe et al. Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100).Quantum Sci. Technol., 6(4):044003, 2021

    2021

  41. [41]

    AEDGE: Atomic experiment for dark matter and gravity exploration in space

    Andrea Bertoldi et al. AEDGE: Atomic experiment for dark matter and gravity exploration in space. Exper. Astron., 51(3):1417–1426, 2021

    2021

  42. [42]

    AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space.EPJ Quant

    Yousef Abou El-Neaj et al. AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space.EPJ Quant. Technol., 7:6, 2020. 31

    2020

  43. [43]

    Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry: Workshop Summary.AVS Quantum Sci., 6(2):024701, 2024

    Sven Abend et al. Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry: Workshop Summary.AVS Quantum Sci., 6(2):024701, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Badurina et al

    L. Badurina et al. AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network.JCAP, 05:011, 2020

    2020

  45. [45]

    Antypas, O

    D. Antypas, O. Tretiak, A. Garcon, R. Ozeri, G. Perez, and D. Budker. Scalar dark matter in the radio-frequency band: atomic-spectroscopy search results.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(14):141102, 2019

    2019

  46. [46]

    Constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter with quadratic couplings.JHEP, 03:104, 2023

    Thomas Bouley, Philip Sørensen, and Tien-Tien Yu. Constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter with quadratic couplings.JHEP, 03:104, 2023

    2023

  47. [47]

    Stadnik, and Peter Wolf

    Aur´ elien Hees, Olivier Minazzoli, Etienne Savalle, Yevgeny V. Stadnik, and Peter Wolf. Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 98(6):064051, 2018

    2018

  48. [48]

    BBN constraints on universally-coupled ultra- light scalar dark matter.JHEP, 12:075, 2020

    Sergey Sibiryakov, Philip Sørensen, and Tien-Tien Yu. BBN constraints on universally-coupled ultra- light scalar dark matter.JHEP, 12:075, 2020

    2020

  49. [49]

    The phenomenol- ogy of quadratically coupled ultra light dark matter.JHEP, 10:042, 2023

    Abhishek Banerjee, Gilad Perez, Marianna Safronova, Inbar Savoray, and Aviv Shalit. The phenomenol- ogy of quadratically coupled ultra light dark matter.JHEP, 10:042, 2023

    2023

  50. [50]

    Fifth Forces from QCD Axions Scale Differently.Phys

    Martin Bauer and Guillaume Rostagni. Fifth Forces from QCD Axions Scale Differently.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(10):101802, 2024

    2024

  51. [51]

    Axion forces in axion backgrounds

    Yuval Grossman, Bingrong Yu, and Siyu Zhou. Axion forces in axion backgrounds. 3 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    Bloch, Quentin Bonnefoy, Sebastian A

    Abhishek Banerjee, Itay M. Bloch, Quentin Bonnefoy, Sebastian A. R. Ellis, Gilad Perez, Inbar Savoray, Konstantin Springmann, and Yevgeny V. Stadnik. Momentum and Matter Matter for Axion Dark Matter Matters on Earth. 2 2025

    2025

  53. [53]

    Ramsey-Musolf, and Mark B

    Donal O’Connell, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, and Mark B. Wise. Minimal Extension of the Standard Model Scalar Sector.Phys. Rev. D, 75:037701, 2007

    2007

  54. [54]

    Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors

    Brian Patt and Frank Wilczek. Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors. 5 2006

    2006

  55. [55]

    C. P. Burgess, Maxim Pospelov, and Tonnis ter Veldhuis. The Minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A Singlet scalar.Nucl. Phys. B, 619:709–728, 2001

    2001

  56. [56]

    Dark Matter through the Higgs portal.Phys

    Giorgio Arcadi, Abdelhak Djouadi, and Martti Raidal. Dark Matter through the Higgs portal.Phys. Rept., 842:1–180, 2020

    2020

  57. [57]

    Nat- ural Ultralight Dark Matter: The Quadratic Twin

    C´ edric Delaunay, Michael Geller, Zamir Heller-Algazi, Gilad Perez, and Konstantin Springmann. Nat- ural Ultralight Dark Matter: The Quadratic Twin. 7 2025

    2025

  58. [58]

    Ross, Gray Rybka, and Elisa Todarello

    Clare Burrage, Angus Macdonald, Michael P. Ross, Gray Rybka, and Elisa Todarello. Impact of cavities on the detection of quadratically coupled ultra-light dark matter, 7 2025

    2025

  59. [59]

    Luty, and Yue Zhao

    Hannah Day, Da Liu, Markus A. Luty, and Yue Zhao. Blowing in the dark matter wind.JHEP, 07:136, 2024

    2024

  60. [60]

    Lucchesi

    David M. Lucchesi. Lageos ii perigee shift and schwarzschild gravitoelectric field.Physics Letters A, 318(3):234–240, 2003

    2003

  61. [61]

    Lucchesi and Roberto Peron

    David M. Lucchesi and Roberto Peron. LAGEOS II pericenter general relativistic precession (1993–2005): Error budget and constraints in gravitational physics.Phys. Rev. D, 89(8):082002, 2014. 32

    1993

  62. [62]

    Lucchesi and Roberto Peron

    David M. Lucchesi and Roberto Peron. Accurate Measurement in the Field of the Earth of the General- Relativistic Precession of the LAGEOS II Pericenter and New Constraints on Non-Newtonian Gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:231103, 2010

    2010

  63. [63]

    Lorenzo Iorio, Iguazio Ciufolini, and Erricos C. Pavlis. Measuring the relativistic perigee advanced with satellite laser ranging.Class. Quant. Grav., 19:4301–4309, 2002

    2002

  64. [64]

    Earth-orbit bounds on screened dark energy

    Fabiano Feleppa, Welmoed Marit de Graaf, Philippe Brax, and Gaetano Lambiase. Earth-orbit bounds on screened dark energy. 11 2025

    2025

  65. [65]

    Pavlis, Giampiero Sindoni, John Ries, Vahe Gurzadyan, and Rolf Koenig

    Ignazio Ciufolini, Richard Matzner, Antonio Paolozzi, Erricos C. Pavlis, Giampiero Sindoni, John Ries, Vahe Gurzadyan, and Rolf Koenig. Satellite Laser-Ranging as a Probe of Fundamental Physics.Sci. Rep., 9(1):15881, 2019

    2019

  66. [66]

    de Salas and Axel Widmark

    Pablo F. de Salas and Axel Widmark. Dark matter local density determination: recent observations and future prospects.Rept. Prog. Phys., 84(10):104901, 2021

    2021

  67. [67]

    Department of defense world geodetic system 1984: Its defi- nition and relationships with local geodetic systems

    National Imagery and Mapping Agency. Department of defense world geodetic system 1984: Its defi- nition and relationships with local geodetic systems. Technical Report Third Edidtion, Jan 2000

    1984

  68. [68]

    Lageos phase b technical report

    NASA. Lageos phase b technical report. Technical Report TMX-64915, Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812, 2 1975

    1975

  69. [69]

    Minott, Thomas W

    Peter O. Minott, Thomas W. Zagwodzki, T. Varghese, and S. Seldon. Prelaunch characterisation of the laser geodynamic satellite (lageos 2). Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D. C. 20546, 9 1993

    1993

  70. [70]

    Dziewonski and Don L

    Adam M. Dziewonski and Don L. Anderson. Preliminary reference earth model.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25(4):297–356, 1981

    1981

  71. [71]

    A. Hees, J. Gu´ ena, M. Abgrall, S. Bize, and P. Wolf. Searching for an oscillating massive scalar field as a dark matter candidate using atomic hyperfine frequency comparisons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(6):061301, 2016

    2016

  72. [72]

    Search for ultralight scalar dark matter with atomic spectroscopy.Phys

    Ken Van Tilburg, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgos Bougas, and Dmitry Budker. Search for ultralight scalar dark matter with atomic spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(1):011802, 2015

    2015

  73. [73]

    Lucchesi

    Massimo Visco and David M. Lucchesi. Review and critical analysis of mass and moments of inertia of the lageos and lageos ii satellites for the larase program.Advances in Space Research, 57(9):1928–1938, 2016

    1928

  74. [74]

    Copeland, and James Stevenson

    Clare Burrage, Edmund J. Copeland, and James Stevenson. Ellipticity Weakens Chameleon Screening. Phys. Rev. D, 91:065030, 2015

    2015

  75. [75]

    Landry, and Xinyu Li

    Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Michael J. Landry, and Xinyu Li. Vortices and waves in light dark matter. JCAP, 01:011, 2021

    2021

  76. [76]

    Wake forces in a background of quadratically coupled mediators.Phys

    Ken Van Tilburg. Wake forces in a background of quadratically coupled mediators.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):096036, 2024

    2024

  77. [77]

    AOb n in(kR(0) ⊕ )−B Ob n 1 (R(0) ⊕ )n+1 # Pn(cosθ) +

    Xucheng Gan, Da Liu, Di Liu, Xuheng Luo, and Bingrong Yu. Detecting Ultralight Dark Matter with Matter Effect. 4 2025. 33 Appendix A: Linearised Field Coefficients Coefficients for the scalar field profile around a layered spherical body, as discussed in Sec. III B 2, and Sec. III C. Specifically, the coefficients below are those for the case where the sc...

    2025