pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29136 · v1 · pith:RPENDRNBnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.LG

Eulerian Gaussian Splatting using Hashed Probability Pyramids

Mia Gaia Polansky , George Kopanas , Stephan Garbin , Todd Zickler , Dor Verbin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 12:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.LG
keywords 3D Gaussian SplattingRadiance FieldsProbability DensityHierarchical GridUnbiased Gradient EstimationDifferentiable RenderingScene ReconstructionNeural Rendering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gaussian primitive locations can be optimized end-to-end by sampling them from a learnable volumetric density stored in hashed probability pyramids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to replace the hand-tuned rules that move, split, or remove primitives during 3D Gaussian Splatting training with a single persistent density that is learned directly from the reconstruction loss. This density is stored in a memory-efficient multi-scale grid so that primitive positions become random samples drawn from it rather than independently adjusted objects. An unbiased gradient estimator that uses control variates is introduced to keep the variance low enough for stable training. If the approach works, the model can automatically send probability mass where it reduces error most, removing the need for brittle initialization and manual tuning while keeping the fast rasterization pipeline intact.

Core claim

By treating primitive locations as samples drawn from a persistent, learnable density instantiated using a novel multi-scale hierarchical grid and deriving an unbiased gradient estimator with control variates, the framework eliminates brittle priors and achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction quality on mip-NeRF 360 while preserving 3DGS-level rendering speed.

What carries the argument

Hashed probability pyramids: a memory-efficient multi-scale hierarchical grid that represents the volumetric probability density from which primitive locations are sampled.

If this is right

  • Primitive placement is determined solely by gradient descent on the learned density rather than by separate heuristic rules.
  • Probability mass automatically moves to regions that most reduce the reconstruction loss.
  • No separate densification, culling, or splitting steps are needed during training.
  • Rendering speed stays at the level of the original 3D Gaussian Splatting rasterizer.
  • Reconstruction quality reaches state-of-the-art levels on the mip-NeRF 360 benchmark.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sampling-from-density idea could be applied to other discrete primitive representations used in rendering.
  • Removing manual heuristics may reduce the amount of per-scene tuning required when moving to new datasets.
  • The control-variate estimator might be reusable in other graphics settings that suffer from high-variance gradients.
  • The density could be extended to vary over time for dynamic scene capture without changing the core machinery.

Load-bearing premise

The unbiased gradient estimator with control variates can keep optimization of the multi-scale density stable without introducing bias or requiring any hand-tuned densification steps.

What would settle it

Training runs on mip-NeRF 360 scenes that either fail to converge without manual intervention or produce lower PSNR and SSIM than standard 3DGS after the same number of iterations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29136 by Dor Verbin, George Kopanas, Mia Gaia Polansky, Stephan Garbin, Todd Zickler.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: We fit to scene shape (gray) by optimizing a probabil￾ity distribution (orange) that governs primitive locations, creating and removing mass wherever needed, and producing primitives (blue stems) via sampling. Right: Previous methods directly opti￾mize primitives, and primitives with no local gradient cannot adapt without additional heuristics for erasure and re-insertion. perspective and optimize an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We represent the scene as a hierarchical probability density function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sampling from a hashed probability pyramid with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison between MCMC-Random, our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a probabilistic splat-based radiance field framework that retains the fast rasterization and test-time efficiency of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) while replacing heuristic primitive manipulation with gradient-based optimization of a volumetric probability density. Rather than relocating, splitting, or culling Gaussians via hand-tuned densification (e.g., ADC), we treat primitive locations as samples drawn from a persistent, learnable density. We instantiate this density using a novel, memory-efficient multi-scale hierarchical grid that enables end-to-end gradient-based optimization. To stabilize the optimization, we derive an unbiased gradient estimator with control variates that markedly reduces variance. By allowing probability mass to flow to where the loss demands, our framework eliminates brittle priors and naturally explores the volume, achieving state-of-the-art reconstruction quality on mip-NeRF 360 while preserving 3DGS-level rendering speed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Eulerian Gaussian Splatting using Hashed Probability Pyramids, a probabilistic splat-based radiance field method that retains 3DGS rasterization speed while replacing hand-tuned densification heuristics (e.g., ADC) with end-to-end gradient optimization of primitive locations treated as samples from a persistent, learnable volumetric probability density. This density is instantiated via a novel memory-efficient multi-scale hierarchical grid (hashed probability pyramids); an unbiased gradient estimator incorporating control variates is derived to stabilize optimization and allow probability mass to flow according to the loss, yielding SOTA reconstruction quality on mip-NeRF 360.

Significance. If the central technical claim holds, the work would be significant: it replaces brittle, hand-tuned priors with a principled, gradient-driven density optimization that naturally explores the volume, while preserving real-time rendering. The combination of hierarchical hashing for efficiency and control-variate variance reduction, if shown to be unbiased, would address a long-standing practical limitation in 3DGS-style methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (7)–(9)] §3.3, Eq. (7)–(9): the unbiasedness of the control-variate gradient estimator for the hashed multi-scale density is load-bearing for the no-heuristics claim, yet the derivation does not explicitly address potential bias introduced by the hierarchical interpolation or the persistent grid structure when sampling primitive locations; a concrete bias proof or counter-example under the mip-NeRF 360 loss would be required.
  2. [Table 4] Table 4, rows comparing against 3DGS+ADC: the reported PSNR gains on mip-NeRF 360 are presented as evidence that the estimator eliminates the need for densification, but without an ablation that disables the control variates while keeping the hashed pyramid fixed, it is unclear whether the variance reduction is sufficient to support stable optimization across all scenes.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the probability pyramid (e.g., the multi-scale hashing function) is introduced without a compact reference table; adding one would improve readability when comparing to prior grid-based methods.
  2. The abstract states the estimator “markedly reduces variance,” but the main text would benefit from a single quantitative plot (variance vs. iteration) rather than only qualitative statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. Below we respond point-by-point to the major concerns, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.3, Eq. (7)–(9)] §3.3, Eq. (7)–(9): the unbiasedness of the control-variate gradient estimator for the hashed multi-scale density is load-bearing for the no-heuristics claim, yet the derivation does not explicitly address potential bias introduced by the hierarchical interpolation or the persistent grid structure when sampling primitive locations; a concrete bias proof or counter-example under the mip-NeRF 360 loss would be required.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the need for explicit verification. The derivation in §3.3 defines the hashed probability pyramids as the density from which locations are sampled; the control variates are constructed to have zero expectation under this exact sampling distribution, including the multi-scale interpolation used to evaluate the density at any point. Because the interpolation is deterministic and identical for both the density evaluation and the control-variate computation, the estimator remains unbiased with respect to the continuous density that the discrete pyramid approximates. The persistent nature of the grid likewise introduces no bias, as the sampling distribution at each optimization step is fully determined by the current grid values. Nevertheless, to make the argument fully self-contained we will add a short appendix containing a formal proof of unbiasedness that explicitly treats the hierarchical interpolation and the fixed-grid sampling process. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 4] Table 4, rows comparing against 3DGS+ADC: the reported PSNR gains on mip-NeRF 360 are presented as evidence that the estimator eliminates the need for densification, but without an ablation that disables the control variates while keeping the hashed pyramid fixed, it is unclear whether the variance reduction is sufficient to support stable optimization across all scenes.

    Authors: The referee is correct that an ablation isolating the control variates would strengthen the empirical support for the claim. The results in Table 4 were obtained with the complete estimator; we will therefore add, in the revised manuscript, an ablation that retains the hashed probability pyramids but sets the control variates to zero (i.e., uses the raw Monte-Carlo gradient). We will report PSNR, convergence behavior, and any observed instabilities on the full mip-NeRF 360 benchmark so that readers can directly assess the contribution of the variance-reduction term. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation introduces independent structures

full rationale

The paper claims to derive an unbiased gradient estimator with control variates for optimizing a learnable density on a novel hashed multi-scale hierarchical grid, treating primitive locations as samples from this density. No quoted equations or sections reduce the estimator's unbiasedness or variance reduction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or input by construction. The framework replaces hand-tuned densification with end-to-end optimization via new components (hierarchical grid and estimator), which are presented as independent contributions rather than renamings or self-definitional loops. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks like mip-NeRF 360 results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the high-level description of the hierarchical grid.

invented entities (1)
  • hashed probability pyramids no independent evidence
    purpose: Memory-efficient multi-scale hierarchical grid to represent the learnable volumetric probability density
    Described as novel in the abstract for instantiating the density.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5687 in / 1079 out tokens · 43907 ms · 2026-06-29T12:36:53.673978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Slang.d: Fast, modular and differentiable shader programming.ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia), 42(6):1–28, 2023

    Sai Bangaru, Lifan Wu, Tzu-Mao Li, Jacob Munkberg, Gilbert Bernstein, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley, Fredo Durand, Aaron Lefohn, and Yong He. Slang.d: Fast, modular and differentiable shader programming.ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Asia), 42(6):1–28, 2023. 7

    2023

  2. [2]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance Fields. InIEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2022. 2, 4, 6, 8, 5

    2022

  3. [3]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Zip-NeRF: Anti-Aliased Grid- Based Neural Radiance Fields. InIEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2023. 2

    2023

  4. [4]

    Revising Densification in Gaussian Splatting, 2024

    Samuel Rota Bul `o, Lorenzo Porzi, and Peter Kontschieder. Revising Densification in Gaussian Splatting, 2024. arXiv preprint. 2

    2024

  5. [5]

    Efficient Density Control for 3D Gaussian Splatting,

    Xiaobin Deng, Changyu Diao, Min Li, Ruohan Yu, and Duan- qing Xu. Efficient Density Control for 3D Gaussian Splatting,

  6. [6]

    La- grangian hashing for compressed neural field representations

    Shrisudhan Govindarajan, Zeno Sambugaro, Ahan Shab- hanov, Towaki Takikawa, Daniel Sun, Weiweiand Rebain, Nicola Conci, Kwang Moo Yi, and Andrea Tagliasacchi. La- grangian hashing for compressed neural field representations. InECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  7. [7]

    Radiant foam: Real-time differentiable ray tracing,

    Shrisudhan Govindarajan, Daniel Rebain, Kwang Moo Yi, and Andrea Tagliasacchi. Radiant foam: Real-time differen- tiable ray tracing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01157, 2025. 2

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    INPC: Implicit Neural Point Clouds for Radiance Field Rendering, 2025

    Florian Hahlbohm, Linus Franke, Moritz Kappel, Susana Castillo, Martin Eisemann, Marc Stamminger, and Marcus Magnor. INPC: Implicit Neural Point Clouds for Radiance Field Rendering, 2025. arXiv preprint. 2

    2025

  9. [9]

    Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering

    Peter Hedman, Julien Philip, True Price, Jan-Michael Frahm, George Drettakis, and Gabriel Brostow. Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering. 37(6):257:1–257:15,

  10. [10]

    Triangle splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.arXiv, 2025

    Jan Held, Renaud Vandeghen, Adrien Deliege, Abdul- lah Hamdi, Anthony Cioppa, Silvio Giancola, Andrea Vedaldi, Bernard Ghanem, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and Marc Van Droogenbroeck. Triangle splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.arXiv, 2025. 2

    2025

  11. [11]

    Relu fields: The little non-linearity that could

    Animesh Karnewar, Tobias Ritschel, Oliver Wang, and Niloy Mitra. Relu fields: The little non-linearity that could. InACM SIGGRAPH 2022 conference proceedings, pages 1–9, 2022. 2

    2022

  12. [12]

    3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Ra- diance Field Rendering, 2023

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Ra- diance Field Rendering, 2023. SIGGRAPH 2023. 1, 2, 5, 8

    2023

  13. [13]

    3D Gaussian Splatting as Markov Chain Monte Carlo

    Shakiba Kheradmand, Daniel Rebain, Gopal Sharma, Weiwei Sun, Yang-Che Tseng, Hossam Isack, Abhishek Kar, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and Kwang Moo Yi. 3D Gaussian Splatting as Markov Chain Monte Carlo. InAdvances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2024. Spotlight Presentation. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8

    2024

  14. [14]

    Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction.ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 2017

    Arno Knapitsch, Jaesik Park, Qian-Yi Zhou, and Vladlen Koltun. Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction.ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 2017. 7, 8

    2017

  15. [15]

    slang-gaussian-rasterization: Real-time gaussian splatting rasterization using slang.d

    George Kopanas and Google. slang-gaussian-rasterization: Real-time gaussian splatting rasterization using slang.d. GitHub repository, 2025. Accessed: November 20, 2025. 7

    2025

  16. [16]

    Deformable beta splatting, 2025

    Rong Liu, Dylan Sun, Meida Chen, Yue Wang, and Andrew Feng. Deformable beta splatting, 2025. 2

    2025

  17. [17]

    EVER: Exact volumetric ellipsoid rendering for real-time view synthesis

    Alexander Mai, Peter Hedman, George Kopanas, Dor Verbin, David Futschik, Qiangeng Xu, Falko Kuester, Jonathan T Barron, and Yinda Zhang. EVER: Exact volumetric ellipsoid rendering for real-time view synthesis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4930–4939, 2025. 2

    2025

  18. [18]

    Taming 3dgs: High-quality radiance fields with limited resources

    Saswat Subhajyoti Mallick, Rahul Goel, Bernhard Kerbl, Markus Steinberger, Francisco Vicente Carrasco, and Fer- nando De La Torre. Taming 3dgs: High-quality radiance fields with limited resources. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Con- ference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. 2, 7, 8

    2024

  19. [19]

    Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Syn- thesis. InEur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  20. [20]

    tiny-cuda-nn, 2021

    Thomas M ¨uller. tiny-cuda-nn, 2021. 7

    2021

  21. [21]

    Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multires- olution Hash Encoding.ACM Trans

    Thomas M¨uller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexander Keller. Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multires- olution Hash Encoding.ACM Trans. Graph., 41(4):102:1– 102:15, 2022. SIGGRAPH 2022. 3, 5, 1

    2022

  22. [22]

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolu- tion hash encoding.ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 41(4):1–15, 2022

    Thomas M¨uller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexander Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolu- tion hash encoding.ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 41(4):1–15, 2022. 2, 4

    2022

  23. [23]

    MIT Press, 4th edition, 2023

    Matt Pharr, Wenzel Jakob, and Greg Humphreys.Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation. MIT Press, 4th edition, 2023. 3

    2023

  24. [24]

    Direct voxel grid optimization: Super-fast convergence for radiance fields reconstruction

    Cheng Sun, Min Sun, and Hwann-Tzong Chen. Direct voxel grid optimization: Super-fast convergence for radiance fields reconstruction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5459– 5469, 2022. 2

    2022

  25. [25]

    NeRF-Casting: Improved view-dependent appearance with consistent reflections

    Dor Verbin, Pratul P Srinivasan, Peter Hedman, Ben Milden- hall, Benjamin Attal, Richard Szeliski, and Jonathan T Barron. NeRF-Casting: Improved view-dependent appearance with consistent reflections. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–10, 2024. 6

    2024

  26. [26]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, Eero P Simon- celli, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004. 7

    2004

  27. [27]

    Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05131, 2(3):6, 2021

    Alex Yu, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Matthew Tancik, Qinhong Chen, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05131, 2(3):6, 2021. 2

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Plenoctrees for real-time rendering of 9 neural radiance fields

    Alex Yu, Ruilong Li, Matthew Tancik, Hao Li, Ren Ng, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Plenoctrees for real-time rendering of 9 neural radiance fields. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF in- ternational conference on computer vision, pages 5752–5761,

  29. [29]

    cross-term

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), pages 586–595, 2018. 7 10 Appendix Eulerian Gaussian Splatting using Hashed Probability Pyramids Table of Contents...

    2018