pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30584 · v1 · pith:EDMGATVCnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.str-el

Symmetry-Resolved Second Harmonic Generation in Quantum and Functional Materials

Xiaoyu Guo , Chang Jae Roh , Youngjun Ahn This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords second harmonic generationrotational anisotropynonlinear susceptibility tensorpoint groupsorder parametershidden ordersmagnetic materialsquantum materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polarization-resolved rotational anisotropy SHG connects nonlinear susceptibility tensors to crystallographic and magnetic point groups for detecting hidden orders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that second harmonic generation has developed into a symmetry-resolved probe capable of linking measured nonlinear response to the underlying point-group symmetries of materials. It shows how polarization-resolved rotational anisotropy measurements extract tensor components that reveal order parameters, particularly when those orders are weak, spatially limited, multipolar, or invisible to linear optics. A reader would care because this supplies an optical route to identify and track phases that standard diffraction or transport methods miss. The review assembles the multipole theory, tensor construction rules, and group-theory connections before surveying applications in polar, magnetic, and electronic systems.

Core claim

Second harmonic generation has evolved from a probe of noncentrosymmetric crystals into a symmetry-resolved optical method for identifying order parameters in quantum and functional materials. Polarization-resolved rotational anisotropy measurements of SHG connect nonlinear susceptibility tensors to the crystallographic and magnetic point groups of the underlying materials. This capability is especially powerful when the ordered state is weak, spatially confined, multipolar, magnetic, or hidden from conventional linear probe techniques.

What carries the argument

The electric-dipole nonlinear susceptibility tensor whose symmetry-allowed components are fixed by the material point group via group theory.

If this is right

  • RA-SHG can detect and map spatially confined or multipolar orders that linear probes miss.
  • It distinguishes magnetic point groups from crystallographic ones in ordered states.
  • Applications cover polar materials, magnetic orders, and hidden electronic phases.
  • The method supports imaging and control of nonequilibrium and intertwined phases.
  • Challenges remain in extending the technique to new classes of quantum materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Time-resolved variants could track how symmetry breaks during ultrafast transitions.
  • Spatial resolution improvements would allow direct imaging of domain walls in hidden-order systems.
  • Cross-checks with other nonlinear channels such as third-harmonic generation could test tensor completeness.
  • The same symmetry-mapping logic might apply to higher-order multipole responses in engineered heterostructures.

Load-bearing premise

The group-theoretical assignment of allowed tensor components to specific order parameters stays valid and complete for weak, multipolar, or hidden orders.

What would settle it

Observation of a material whose known hidden order produces RA-SHG patterns that require a point group incompatible with independent structural or magnetic characterization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30584 by Chang Jae Roh, Xiaoyu Guo, Youngjun Ahn.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Optical transitions and the corresponding radiation sources [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic illustration of RA-SHG measurement geometries. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the optical platform of RA-SHG scanning microscopy and wide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Surface and interface symmetry characterization of oxide heterostructures using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Crystal symmetry characterization in vdW materials using RA-SHG. (a) Crystal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Strain- and curvature-induced ferroelectricity in oxide membranes probed by SHG. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Optical probing of polar domain walls by SHG. (a) Polarization-resolved SHG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Different categories of magnetic point groups and their examples. (a and b) Examples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SHG detection of magnetic order and spin-symmetry breaking in bulk and two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: RA-SHG detection of exotic magnetic orders in quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SHG visualization and control of ferroic domains in magnetic materials. (a) SHG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Surface and extraordinary phase transitions in bulk CrSBr revealed by RA-SHG. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Dual magnetic orders in Co3Sn2S2 revealed by RA-SHG. Temperature dependence of the SHG intensity (a) and angular rotation 𝛥𝜑 (b) from the TR-invariant i-type and TR￾broken c-type contributions, respectively. 𝑇஼,ଵ and 𝑇஼,ଶ are marked by the dashed red line and blue line, respectively. (c) Diagram of magnetic phases across 𝑇஼,ଵand 𝑇஼,ଶ with spin components along the out-of-plane and in-plane directions. Fig… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Schematic illustration of two degenerate ferro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Rotational response induced by an electric toroidal dipole. In a ferro-rotational state, the axial order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Optical scanning probes and symmetry characterization of ferro-rotational domains in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Ultrafast optical control of ferro-rotational order by THz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Structural distortion corresponding to ferro-rotational orders in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The evidence for ferro-rotational order in RbFe(MoO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Even-parity electronic nematic phase transition. The electronic structure represented by Fermi surface changes from a rotational symmetric state with 𝑑௫మି௬మ ൌ 0 to an anisotropic nematic state with 𝑑௫మି௬మ ് 0. Hecker et al. classified even-parity electronic nematic phase transitions by considering all crystallographic point groups [145]. In this classification, a nematic state can be represented by five c… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Structural and electronic order parameters in pyrochlore [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: RA-SHG identification of hidden parity-odd nematic state in Cd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_22.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Second harmonic generation (SHG) has evolved from a probe of noncentrosymmetric crystals into a symmetry-resolved optical method for identifying order parameters in quantum and functional materials. In particular, polarization-resolved rotational anisotropy (RA) measurements of SHG can connect nonlinear susceptibility tensors to the crystallographic and magnetic point groups of the underlying materials. This capability is especially powerful when the ordered state is weak, spatially confined, multipolar, magnetic, or hidden from conventional linear probe techniques. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive overview of RA-SHG studies across a broad range of condensed matter systems. We begin with basic theoretical background for the multipole origins of SHG radiation, the construction of nonlinear susceptibility tensors, and group-theoretical framework connecting tensor components to order parameters. We then review the applications of RA-SHG to polar materials, magnetic orders, and other hidden electronic materials. Finally, we outline challenges and future research directions for using SHG to reveal, image, and control hidden, intertwined, and nonequilibrium phases in quantum and functional materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. This review article summarizes the evolution of second harmonic generation (SHG) into a symmetry-resolved probe, with emphasis on polarization-resolved rotational anisotropy (RA) measurements. It connects nonlinear susceptibility tensors to crystallographic and magnetic point groups via group theory, highlighting utility for weak, spatially confined, multipolar, magnetic, or hidden orders inaccessible to linear probes. The manuscript covers multipole origins of SHG, tensor construction, group-theoretical mappings, applications to polar materials, magnetic orders and hidden electronic states, plus challenges and future directions.

Significance. As a synthesis of established RA-SHG literature and standard group-theoretical mappings, the review consolidates precedents for probing hidden orders and could serve as a reference resource in condensed-matter optics, provided the cited applications accurately reflect the breadth of prior work. No new derivations or parameter-free results are presented; credit is due for framing the method's scope across multiple material classes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our review and for recommending acceptance. The report accurately captures the manuscript's scope as a synthesis of RA-SHG methods and their applications to hidden orders.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper aggregates external literature; no internal derivation chain present

full rationale

This is a review article summarizing established RA-SHG methods, nonlinear susceptibility tensors, and group-theoretical mappings drawn from pre-existing external literature. The abstract and structure explicitly frame the work as an overview of prior studies on polar materials, magnetic orders, and hidden phases, with no new equations, fitted parameters, or predictions derived from the authors' own inputs. Central claims rest on cited precedents rather than self-referential reductions, satisfying the condition for a self-contained review against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on established group theory and prior experimental literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1072 out tokens · 26979 ms · 2026-06-29T06:06:35.166873+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 142 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    symmetry language

    Outlook and challenges The role of SHG has expanded from detecting noncentrosymmetric crystals to resolving tensor signatures of broken symmetry in quantum and functional materials [2,3,22,70]. As reviewed above, SHG is no longer limited to identifying whether inversion symmetry is present or absent. Through polarization resolution, rotational anisotropy,...

  2. [2]

    Jackson 1925-2016., Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 1999

    J.D. Jackson 1925-2016., Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 1999

    1925

  3. [3]

    Orenstein, J.E

    J. Orenstein, J.E. Moore, T. Morimoto, D.H. Torchinsky, J.W. Harter, D. Hsieh, Topology and Symmetry of Quantum Materials via Nonlinear Optical Responses, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 12 (2021) 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 031218-013712

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 2021

  4. [4]

    Boyd author., Nonlinear optics, Fourth edition., Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier, 2020

    R.W. Boyd author., Nonlinear optics, Fourth edition., Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Stokes, D.M

    H.T. Stokes, D.M. Hatch, Coupled order parameters in the Landau theory of phase transitions in solids, Phase Transitions 34 (1991) 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411599108205192

    work page doi:10.1080/01411599108205192 1991

  6. [6]

    Z. Wu, W. Xiong, Neumann’s principle based eigenvector approach for deriving non- vanishing tensor elements for nonlinear optics, The Journal of Chemical Physics 157 (2022) 134702. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118711

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0118711 2022

  7. [7]

    Kittel, Introduction to solid state physics, 8

    C. Kittel, Introduction to solid state physics, 8. ed., [repr.], Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 20

  8. [8]

    Aizu, Possible Species of Ferroelectrics, Phys

    K. Aizu, Possible Species of Ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. 146 (1966) 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.146.423

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.146.423 1966

  9. [9]

    Aizu, Possible Species of Ferromagnetic, Ferroelectric, and Ferroelastic Crystals, Phys

    K. Aizu, Possible Species of Ferromagnetic, Ferroelectric, and Ferroelastic Crystals, Phys. Rev. B 2 (1970) 754–772. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.2.754

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.2.754 1970

  10. [10]

    Tolédano, J.-C

    P . Tolédano, J.-C. Tolédano, Order-parameter symmetries for improper ferroelectric nonferroelastic transitions, Phys. Rev. B 14 (1976) 3097–3109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.14.3097

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.3097 1976

  11. [11]

    Benedek, C.J

    N.A. Benedek, C.J. Fennie, Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity: A Mechanism for Controllable Polarization-Magnetization Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 107204. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.107204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.107204 2011

  12. [12]

    Yoshida, H

    S. Yoshida, H. Akamatsu, R. Tsuji, O. Hernandez, H. Padmanabhan, A. Sen Gupta, A.S. Gibbs, K. Mibu, S. Murai, J.M. Rondinelli, V. Gopalan, K. Tanaka, K. Fujita, Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity in (Sr,Ca) 3 Sn2 O7 and Beyond: Universal Relationship between Ferroelectric Transition Temperature and Tolerance Factor in n = 2 Ruddlesden–Popper Phases, J. Am. ...

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.8b07998 2018

  13. [13]

    Bousquet, M

    E. Bousquet, M. Dawber, N. Stucki, C. Lichtensteiger, P . Hermet, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone, P . Ghosez, Improper ferroelectricity in perovskite oxide artificial superlattices, Nature 452 (2008) 732–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06817

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06817 2008

  14. [14]

    Y .S. Oh, X. Luo, F.-T. Huang, Y . Wang, S.-W. Cheong, Experimental demonstration of hybrid improper ferroelectricity and the presence of abundant charged walls in (Ca,Sr)3Ti2O7 crystals, Nature Mater 14 (2015) 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4168

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4168 2015

  15. [15]

    Tolédano, M

    P . Tolédano, M. Guennou, J. Kreisel, Order-parameter symmetries of domain walls in ferroelectrics and ferroelastics, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 134104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.134104

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.134104 2014

  16. [16]

    Schranz, I

    W. Schranz, I. Rychetsky, J. Hlinka, Polarity of domain boundaries in nonpolar materials derived from order parameter and layer group symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 184105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.184105 2019

  17. [17]

    Van Aert, S

    S. Van Aert, S. Turner, R. Delville, D. Schryvers, G. Van Tendeloo, E.K.H. Salje, Direct Observation of Ferrielectricity at Ferroelastic Domain Boundaries in CaTiO 3 by Electron Microscopy, Advanced Materials 24 (2012) 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103717

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201103717 2012

  18. [18]

    Barone, D

    P . Barone, D. Di Sante, S. Picozzi, Improper origin of polar displacements at CaTiO 3 and CaMnO 3 twin walls, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 144104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.144104

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.144104 2014

  19. [19]

    Franken, A.E

    P .A. Franken, A.E. Hill, C.W. Peters, G. Weinreich, Generation of Optical Harmonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 (1961) 118–119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.118

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.7.118 1961

  20. [20]

    Flörsheimer, R

    M. Flörsheimer, R. Paschotta, U. Kubitscheck, C. Brillert, D. Hofmann, L. Heuer, G. Schreiber, C. Verbeek, W. Sohler, H. Fuchs, Second-harmonic imaging of ferroelectric domains in LiNbO 3 with micron resolution in lateral and axial directions, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 67 (1998) 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400050552

    work page doi:10.1007/s003400050552 1998

  21. [21]

    Nordlander, G

    J. Nordlander, G. De Luca, N. Strkalj, M. Fiebig, M. Trassin, Probing Ferroic States in Oxide Thin Films Using Optical Second Harmonic Generation, Applied Sciences 8 (2018) 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040570

    work page doi:10.3390/app8040570 2018

  22. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    Y . Zhang, Y . Zhang, Q. Guo, X. Zhong, Y . Chu, H. Lu, G. Zhong, J. Jiang, C. Tan, M. Liao, Z. Lu, D. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Yuan, Y . Zhou, Characterization of domain distributions by second harmonic generation in ferroelectrics, Npj Comput Mater 4 (2018) 39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-018-0095-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0095-6 2018

  23. [23]

    Denev, T.T.A

    S.A. Denev, T.T.A. Lummen, E. Barnes, A. Kumar, V. Gopalan, Probing Ferroelectrics Using Optical Second Harmonic Generation, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 94 (2011) 2699–2727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04740.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04740.x 2011

  24. [24]

    Kirbus, S.D

    B. Kirbus, S.D. Seddon, I. Kiseleva, E. Beyreuther, M. Rüsing, L.M. Eng, Probing ferroelectric phase transitions in barium titanate single crystals via in situ second harmonic generation microscopy, Journal of Applied Physics 136 (2024) 154102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0237769

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0237769 2024

  25. [25]

    Kaneshiro, Y

    J. Kaneshiro, Y . Uesu, Domain Structure Analyses of Tetragonal BaTiO 3 Single Crystal by Scanning Second-Harmonic Generation Microscopy: Birefringence Effect on Second- Harmonic Generation Polarization Diagram, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50 (2011) 09NE11. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP .50.09NE11

    work page doi:10.1143/jjap 2011

  26. [26]

    J. Wang, K. Jin, J. Gu, Q. Wan, H. Yao, G. Yang, Direct evidence of correlation between the second harmonic generation anisotropy patterns and the polarization orientation of perovskite ferroelectric, Sci Rep 7 (2017) 9051. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09339-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09339-2 2017

  27. [27]

    Weber, Y

    M.C. Weber, Y . Zemp, M. Trassin, A. Simonov, J. Schaab, B. Gao, S. Cheong, T. Lottermoser, M. Fiebig, Asymmetric Character of the Ferroelectric Phase Transition and Charged Domain Walls in a Hybrid Improper Ferroelectric, Adv Elect Materials 8 (2022) 2100434. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202100434

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202100434 2022

  28. [28]

    Nordlander, M

    J. Nordlander, M. Campanini, M.D. Rossell, R. Erni, Q.N. Meier, A. Cano, N.A. Spaldin, M. Fiebig, M. Trassin, The ultrathin limit of improper ferroelectricity, Nat Commun 10 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13474-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13474-x

  30. [30]

    Fiebig, Th

    M. Fiebig, Th. Lottermoser, D. Fröhlich, A.V. Goltsev, R.V. Pisarev, Observation of coupled magnetic and electric domains, Nature 419 (2002) 818–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01077

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01077 2002

  31. [31]

    Roh, J.R

    C.J. Roh, J.R. Kim, S. Park, Y .J. Shin, B.-J. Yang, T.W. Noh, J.S. Lee, Structural symmetry evolution in surface and interface of SrRuO3 thin films, Applied Surface Science 553 (2021) 149574

    2021

  32. [32]

    Savoia, D

    A. Savoia, D. Paparo, P . Perna, Z. Ristic, M. Salluzzo, F. Miletto Granozio, U. Scotti Di Uccio, C. Richter, S. Thiel, J. Mannhart, L. Marrucci, Polar catastrophe and electronic reconstructions at the LaAlO 3 / SrTiO 3 interface: Evidence from optical second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 075110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.075110

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.075110 2009

  33. [33]

    Günter, A

    T. Günter, A. Rubano, D. Paparo, M. Lilienblum, L. Marrucci, F. Miletto Granozio, U. Scotti Di Uccio, R. Jany, C. Richter, J. Mannhart, M. Fiebig, Spatial inhomogeneities at the LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 interface: Evidence from second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B 86 (2012) 235418. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235418

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.235418 2012

  34. [34]

    Yokota, Y

    H. Yokota, Y . Uesu, Optical second-harmonic generation microscopy as a tool for ferroelastic domain wall exploration, Journal of Applied Physics 129 (2021) 014101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0032881

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0032881 2021

  35. [35]

    Cherifi-Hertel, H

    S. Cherifi-Hertel, H. Bulou, R. Hertel, G. Taupier, K.D. Dorkenoo, C. Andreas, J. Guyonnet, I. Gaponenko, K. Gallo, P . Paruch, Non-Ising and chiral ferroelectric domain walls revealed by nonlinear optical microscopy, Nat Commun 8 (2017) 15768. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15768

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms15768 2017

  36. [36]

    Zhang, J.H

    W. Zhang, J.H. Yeo, X. Guo, T. Chiang, N. Agarwal, J.T. Heron, K. Sun, J. Yang, S.-W. Cheong, Y . Ahn, L. Zhao, Intertwined Polar, Chiral, and Ferro-Rotational Orders in a Homo- Ferro-Rotational Insulator, Phys. Rev. X 16 (2026) 021030. https://doi.org/10.1103/wkgv-lsj6

    work page doi:10.1103/wkgv-lsj6 2026

  37. [37]

    De Luca, M.D

    G. De Luca, M.D. Rossell, J. Schaab, N. Viart, M. Fiebig, M. Trassin, Domain Wall Architecture in Tetragonal Ferroelectric Thin Films, Advanced Materials 29 (2017) 1605145. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605145

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201605145 2017

  38. [38]

    R. Xu, K.J. Crust, V. Harbola, R. Arras, K.Y . Patel, S. Prosandeev, H. Cao, Y . Shao, P . Behera, L. Caretta, W.J. Kim, A. Khandelwal, M. Acharya, M.M. Wang, Y. Liu, E.S. Barnard, A. Raja, L.W. Martin, X.W. Gu, H. Zhou, R. Ramesh, D.A. Muller, L. Bellaiche, H.Y . Hwang, Size- Induced Ferroelectricity in Antiferroelectric Oxide Membranes, Advanced Materia...

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202210562 2023

  39. [39]

    R. Xu, J. Huang, E.S. Barnard, S.S. Hong, P . Singh, E.K. Wong, T. Jansen, V. Harbola, J. Xiao, B.Y . Wang, S. Crossley, D. Lu, S. Liu, H.Y . Hwang, Strain-induced room-temperature ferroelectricity in SrTiO3 membranes, Nat Commun 11 (2020) 3141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16912-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16912-3 2020

  40. [40]

    Segantini, L

    G. Segantini, L. Tovaglieri, C.J. Roh, C.-Y . Hsu, S. Cho, R. Bulanadi, P . Ondrejkovic, P . Marton, J. Hlinka, S. Gariglio, others, Curvature-Controlled Polarization in Adaptive Ferroelectric Membranes, Small 21 (2025) e06338

    2025

  41. [41]

    D. Li, X. Hou, F. Kong, K. Wang, X. Hong, Giant Modulation of Second-Harmonic Generation in CuInP 2 S6 by Interfacing with MoS2 Atomic Layers, ACS Nano 18 (2024) 32890– 32898. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c12352

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c12352 2024

  42. [42]

    Abdelwahab, B

    I. Abdelwahab, B. Tilmann, Y . Wu, D. Giovanni, I. Verzhbitskiy, M. Zhu, R. Berté, F. Xuan, L.D.S. Menezes, G. Eda, T.C. Sum, S.Y . Quek, S.A. Maier, K.P . Loh, Giant second-harmonic generation in ferroelectric NbOI2, Nat. Photon. 16 (2022) 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01021-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-022-01021-y 2022

  43. [43]

    Yumoto, F

    G. Yumoto, F. Harata, T. Nakamura, A. Wakamiya, Y . Kanemitsu, Electrically switchable chiral nonlinear optics in an achiral ferroelectric 2D van der Waals halide perovskite, Sci. Adv. 10 (2024) eadq5521. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq5521

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adq5521 2024

  44. [44]

    Mannhart, D.G

    J. Mannhart, D.G. Schlom, Oxide Interfaces—An Opportunity for Electronics, Science 327 (2010) 1607–1611. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1181862

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1181862 2010

  45. [45]

    De Luca, A

    G. De Luca, A. Rubano, E. di Gennaro, A. Khare, F.M. Granozio, U.S. di Uccio, L. Marrucci, D. Paparo, Potential-well depth at amorphous-LaAlO3/crystalline-SrTiO3 interfaces measured by optical second harmonic generation, Applied Physics Letters 104 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    Jeong, I.H

    S.G. Jeong, I.H. Choi, S. Nair, L. Buiarelli, B. Pourbahari, J.Y . Oh, B.Y . Lin, J.M. LeBeau, N. Bassim, D. Hirai, others, Altermagnetic polar metallic phase in ultrathin epitaxially strained RuO2 films, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (2026) e2526641123

    2026

  47. [47]

    Roh, M.-C

    C.J. Roh, M.-C. Jung, J.R. Kim, K.-J. Go, J. Kim, H.J. Oh, Y .-R. Jo, Y .J. Shin, J.G. Choi, B.-J. Kim, others, Polar metal phase induced by oxygen octahedral network relaxation in oxide thin films, Small 16 (2020) 2003055

    2020

  48. [48]

    Kumar, S

    N. Kumar, S. Najmaei, Q. Cui, F. Ceballos, P .M. Ajayan, J. Lou, H. Zhao, Second harmonic microscopy of monolayer MoS 2, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87 (2013) 161403

    2013

  49. [49]

    Malard, T.V

    L.M. Malard, T.V. Alencar, A.P .M. Barboza, K.F. Mak, A.M. De Paula, Observation of intense second harmonic generation from MoS 2 atomic crystals, Physical Review B— Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87 (2013) 201401

    2013

  50. [50]

    Y . Li, Y . Rao, K.F. Mak, Y . You, S. Wang, C.R. Dean, T.F. Heinz, Probing Symmetry Properties of Few-Layer MoS2 and h-BN by Optical Second-Harmonic Generation, Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 3329–3333. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401561r

    work page doi:10.1021/nl401561r 2013

  51. [51]

    Hsu, Z.-A

    W.-T. Hsu, Z.-A. Zhao, L.-J. Li, C.-H. Chen, M.-H. Chiu, P .-S. Chang, Y .-C. Chou, W.-H. Chang, Second harmonic generation from artificially stacked transition metal dichalcogenide twisted bilayers, ACS Nano 8 (2014) 2951–2958

    2014

  52. [52]

    Mennel, M.M

    L. Mennel, M.M. Furchi, S. Wachter, M. Paur, D.K. Polyushkin, T. Mueller, Optical imaging of strain in two-dimensional crystals, Nature Communications 9 (2018) 516

    2018

  53. [53]

    F. Liu, L. You, K.L. Seyler, X. Li, P . Yu, J. Lin, X. Wang, J. Zhou, H. Wang, H. He, others, Room-temperature ferroelectricity in CuInP2S6 ultrathin flakes, Nature Communications 7 (2016) 1–6

    2016

  54. [54]

    J. Xiao, H. Zhu, Y . Wang, W. Feng, Y . Hu, A. Dasgupta, Y . Han, Y . Wang, D.A. Muller, L.W. Martin, others, Intrinsic two-dimensional ferroelectricity with dipole locking, Physical Review Letters 120 (2018) 227601

    2018

  55. [55]

    Junquera, P

    J. Junquera, P . Ghosez, Critical thickness for ferroelectricity in perovskite ultrathin films, Nature 422 (2003) 506–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01501

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01501 2003

  56. [56]

    Gerra, A.K

    G. Gerra, A.K. Tagantsev, N. Setter, K. Parlinski, Ionic Polarizability of Conductive Metal Oxides and Critical Thickness for Ferroelectricity in BaTiO 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 107603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.107603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.107603 2006

  57. [57]

    Y .J. Shin, Y . Kim, S. Kang, H. Nahm, P . Murugavel, J.R. Kim, M.R. Cho, L. Wang, S.M. Yang, J. Yoon, J. Chung, M. Kim, H. Zhou, S.H. Chang, T.W. Noh, Interface Control of Ferroelectricity in an SrRuO 3 /BaTiO3 /SrRuO3 Capacitor and its Critical Thickness, Advanced Materials 29 (2017) 1602795. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201602795

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201602795 2017

  58. [58]

    Song, C.A

    Q. Song, C.A. Occhialini, E. Ergeçen, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso, P. Barone, J. Kapeghian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A.S. Botana, S. Picozzi, N. Gedik, R. Comin, Evidence for a single- layer van der Waals multiferroic, Nature 602 (2022) 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- 021-04337-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586- 2022

  59. [59]

    S. Choo, S. Varshney, H. Liu, S. Sharma, R.D. James, B. Jalan, From oxide epitaxy to freestanding membranes: Opportunities and challenges, Sci. Adv. 10 (2024) eadq8561. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq8561

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adq8561 2024

  60. [60]

    Torchinsky, H

    D.H. Torchinsky, H. Chu, L. Zhao, N.B. Perkins, Y . Sizyuk, T. Qi, G. Cao, D. Hsieh, Structural Distortion-Induced Magnetoelastic Locking in Sr 2 IrO 4 Revealed through Nonlinear Optical Harmonic Generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 096404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.096404 2015

  61. [61]

    Zhao, D.H

    L. Zhao, D.H. Torchinsky, H. Chu, V. Ivanov, R. Lifshitz, R. Flint, T. Qi, G. Cao, D. Hsieh, Evidence of an odd-parity hidden order in a spin–orbit coupled correlated iridate, Nature Phys 12 (2016) 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3517

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3517 2016

  62. [62]

    Zhao, C.A

    L. Zhao, C.A. Belvin, R. Liang, D.A. Bonn, W.N. Hardy, N.P . Armitage, D. Hsieh, A global inversion-symmetry-broken phase inside the pseudogap region of YBa2Cu3Oy, Nature Phys 13 (2017) 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3962

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3962 2017

  63. [63]

    de la Torre, K.L

    A. de la Torre, K.L. Seyler, L. Zhao, S.D. Matteo, M.S. Scheurer, Y . Li, B. Yu, M. Greven, S. Sachdev, M.R. Norman, D. Hsieh, Mirror symmetry breaking in a model insulating cuprate, Nat. Phys. 17 (2021) 777–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01210-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01210-6 2021

  64. [64]

    W. Jin, E. Drueke, S. Li, A. Admasu, R. Owen, M. Day, K. Sun, S.-W. Cheong, L. Zhao, Observation of a ferro-rotational order coupled with second-order nonlinear optical fields, Nat. Phys. 16 (2020) 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0695-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0695-1 2020

  65. [65]

    Trzeciecki, W

    M. Trzeciecki, W. Hübner, Time-reversal symmetry in nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 13888–13891. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.13888

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.13888 2000

  66. [66]

    Saatjian, S

    R. Saatjian, S. Dovrén, K. Yamakawa, R.S. Russell, J.G. Analytis, J.W. Harter, Quantum decoherence by magnetic fluctuations in a magnetic topological insulator, Npj Quantum Mater. 10 (2025) 81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-025-00795-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00795-y 2025

  67. [67]

    Nouneh, R

    K. Nouneh, R. Viennois, I.V. Kityk, F. Terki, S. Charar, S. Benet, S. Paschen, Photoinduced second harmonic generation of LaFe4Sb12 near spin fluctuated critical points, Physica Status Solidi (b) 241 (2004) 3069–3080. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200402087

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.200402087 2004

  68. [68]

    Fiebig, D

    M. Fiebig, D. Fröhlich, B.B. Krichevtsov, R.V. Pisarev, Second Harmonic Generation and Magnetic-Dipole-Electric-Dipole Interference in Antiferromagnetic ${\mathrm{Cr}}_{2}$${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 2127–2130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2127

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.2127 1994

  69. [69]

    C. Wang, X. Guo, Z. Zhai, M. Cheng, S.-W. Cheong, A.W. Tsen, B. Lv, L. Zhao, Tuning Coupled Toroidic and Polar Orders in a Bilayer Antiferromagnet, (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.13542

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.13542 2025

  70. [70]

    Xiao, D.-F

    R.-C. Xiao, D.-F. Shao, W. Gan, H.-W. Wang, H. Han, Z.G. Sheng, C. Zhang, H. Jiang, H. Li, Classification of second harmonic generation effect in magnetically ordered materials, Npj Quantum Mater. 8 (2023) 62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-023-00594-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00594-3 2023

  71. [71]

    Birss, Symmetry and magnetism, North-Holland Pub

    R.R. Birss, Symmetry and magnetism, North-Holland Pub. Co.;, Amsterdam, 1966

    1966

  72. [72]

    L. Zhao, D. Torchinsky, J. Harter, A. de la Torre, D. Hsieh, Second Harmonic Generation Spectroscopy of Hidden Phases, in: B.D. Guenther, D.G. Steel (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Modern Optics (Second Edition), Elsevier, Oxford, 2018: pp. 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-803581-8.09533-3

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0- 2018

  73. [73]

    Reif, J.C

    J. Reif, J.C. Zink, C.-M. Schneider, J. Kirschner, Effects of surface magnetism on optical second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 2878–2881. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2878

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.2878 1991

  74. [74]

    J. Reif, C. Rau, E. Matthias, Influence of magnetism on second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1931–1934. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1931

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1931 1993

  75. [75]

    Fiebig, D

    M. Fiebig, D. Fröhlich, Th. Lottermoser, V.V. Pavlov, R.V. Pisarev, H.-J. Weber, Second Harmonic Generation in the Centrosymmetric Antiferromagnet NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 137202. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.137202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.137202 2001

  76. [76]

    Gridnev, V.V

    V.N. Gridnev, V.V. Pavlov, R.V. Pisarev, A. Kirilyuk, Th. Rasing, Second harmonic generation in anisotropic magnetic films, Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 184407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184407

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.184407 2001

  77. [77]

    Hansteen, Selective surface/interface characterization of thin garnet films by magnetization-induced second-harmonic generation, Phys

    F. Hansteen, Selective surface/interface characterization of thin garnet films by magnetization-induced second-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.094408

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.094408 2004

  78. [78]

    Seyler, A

    K.L. Seyler, A. de la Torre, Z. Porter, E. Zoghlin, R. Polski, M. Nguyen, S. Nadj-Perge, S.D. Wilson, D. Hsieh, Spin-orbit-enhanced magnetic surface second-harmonic generation in Sr 2 Ir O 4, Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 201113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.201113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.201113 2020

  79. [79]

    de la Torre, S

    A. de la Torre, S. Di Matteo, D. Hsieh, M.R. Norman, Implications of second harmonic generation for hidden order in ${\mathrm{Sr}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 035138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.035138

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.035138 2021

  80. [80]

    Y . Ahn, X. Guo, R. Xue, K. Qu, K. Sun, D. Mandrus, L. Zhao, Electric quadrupole second-harmonic generation revealing dual magnetic orders in a magnetic Weyl semimetal, Nat. Photon. (2023) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01300-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-023-01300-2 2023

Showing first 80 references.