pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03703 · v1 · pith:NYNZSO3Xnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-th

Phase structure of strong interaction matter from Functional QCD

Christian S. Fischer , Jan M. Pawlowski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords functional QCDDyson-Schwinger equationsfunctional renormalisation groupQCD phase diagramfinite temperaturefinite chemical potentialnon-perturbative methods
0
0 comments X

The pith

Functional methods based on Dyson-Schwinger equations and the functional renormalisation group provide a first-principles approach to the QCD phase structure at finite temperature and chemical potential.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review introduces the functional approach to quantum chromodynamics at finite temperature and baryon chemical potential as a complementary first-principles tool. It outlines the general framework of Dyson-Schwinger equations and the functional renormalisation group and explains their complementarity to other methods such as lattice QCD. Selected results on the phase diagram are presented in a pedagogical style aimed at students and non-practitioners. The discussion places these results in the broader context of understanding the phase structure of strong interaction matter.

Core claim

The functional approach to QCD using Dyson-Schwinger equations and the functional renormalisation group offers a complementary first-principles method for investigating the phase structure of strong interaction matter at finite temperature and chemical potential.

What carries the argument

Dyson-Schwinger equations and the functional renormalisation group applied to the QCD phase diagram at finite temperature and density.

If this is right

  • The methods enable access to regions of the phase diagram at finite chemical potential where lattice simulations encounter the sign problem.
  • They yield information on the location and nature of possible critical endpoints and phase transitions.
  • Thermodynamic quantities and propagators can be computed consistently across the phase diagram.
  • The framework supports systematic improvement by enlarging the truncation while remaining first-principles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These techniques could be combined with astrophysical observations to constrain the equation of state at high density.
  • Results on the phase structure may guide interpretations of heavy-ion collision data on chemical freeze-out.
  • Further refinement of truncations could allow quantitative predictions for the chiral and deconfinement transitions simultaneously.

Load-bearing premise

That the truncations and approximations inherent to practical implementations of DSE and fRG do not introduce uncontrolled errors that would invalidate the selected results on the QCD phase diagram.

What would settle it

A direct mismatch between functional-method predictions for the critical temperature or order parameters at zero chemical potential and corresponding lattice QCD results would indicate uncontrolled truncation errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03703 by Christian S. Fischer, Jan M. Pawlowski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of the QCD phase diagram in the temperature and baryon chemical potential plane. Figure taken [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Full propagators and vertices are indicated by grey blobs, the classical vertices are indicated by small black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sketch of the QCD phase diagram in the temperature and baryon chemical potential plane augmented with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: 3d-Columbia plot with real and imaginary chemical potential as third axis. The second order critical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comprehensive functional phase structure, including strangeness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Results for the kurtosis extracted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this contribution to the Encyclopedia of Nuclear Physics, we aim to provide a pedagogical introduction to the functional approach to QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential. We briefly outline the general framework and address its complementarity to other first-principle approaches to non-perturbative QCD. We discuss selected results obtained with Dyson-Schwinger equations (DSE) and the functional renormalisation group (fRG) in the context of a general physics perspective on the QCD phase diagram. This article is specifically aimed at students and non-practitioners of functional methods alike and may serve as a short guide to further literature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a pedagogical review contribution to the Encyclopedia of Nuclear Physics. It outlines the general framework of Dyson-Schwinger equations (DSE) and the functional renormalisation group (fRG) as first-principles tools for the phase structure of QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential, discusses their complementarity to lattice QCD and other methods, and summarizes selected existing results on the QCD phase diagram for an audience of students and non-practitioners.

Significance. As a concise, accessible entry aimed at non-experts, the review would usefully consolidate the literature on functional methods for the QCD phase diagram if the selected results and framework descriptions are accurately and balancedly presented. The absence of new derivations or quantitative predictions means its value lies in synthesis and guidance to further reading rather than novel claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the article 'may serve as a short guide to further literature'; the manuscript should include an explicit, annotated bibliography or reading list section to fulfill this pedagogical aim.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels in any phase-diagram plots should explicitly note the truncation scheme and parameter set used for each curve, consistent with the review's emphasis on controlled approximations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of the manuscript. We are pleased that the pedagogical focus and synthesis of functional methods for the QCD phase diagram are viewed as useful for the intended audience of students and non-practitioners.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper presents no new derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a pedagogical review and encyclopedia entry that outlines the general DSE/fRG framework and summarizes prior literature results without advancing any standalone technical assertions, new equations, quantitative predictions, or derivations. No load-bearing steps exist that could reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatze within the document itself; the central claim of complementarity to other first-principles methods is presented as established context rather than a derived result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the paper rests on standard QCD axioms and prior developments in functional methods. No new free parameters or invented entities are indicated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard QCD Lagrangian and gauge symmetries
    Functional methods build directly on established QCD theory as background.
  • domain assumption Validity of truncations in DSE and fRG implementations
    The selected results depend on approximations whose accuracy is assumed but not re-derived in the review.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5625 in / 1356 out tokens · 37306 ms · 2026-06-28T09:20:35.659227+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scalar diquarks in the QCD vacuum

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A first-principles FRG approach to two-flavor QCD derives low-energy constants for the pion, sigma-meson and scalar diquark without parameters beyond QCD itself, including new diquark properties for color-superconduct...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (STAR) (2021)

    Abdallah M and et al. (STAR) (2021). Cumulants and correlation functions of net-proton, proton, and antiproton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider.Phys. Rev. C104 (2): 024902. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024902. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 111, 029902 (2025)],2101.12413. Aboona BE and et al...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.024902 2021

  2. [2]

    The Infrared Behavior of QCD Green's Functions - Confinement, Dynamical Symmetry Breaking, and Hadrons as Relativistic Bound States

    doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00010-2.hep-ph/0007355. Alkofer R, Huber MQ and Schwenzer K (2010). Infrared singularities in Landau gauge Yang-Mills theory.Phys. Rev. D81: 105010. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.81.105010.0801.2762. Andronic A, Braun-Munzinger P, Redlich K and Stachel J (2018). Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy.N...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00010-2.hep-ph/0007355 2010

  3. [3]

    Bernhardt J and Fischer CS (2023b)

    doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01098-1.2305.01434. Bernhardt J and Fischer CS (2023b). Qcd phase transitions in the light quark chiral limit.Phys. Rev. D108 (11): 114018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108. 114018.2309.06737. Bernhardt J and Fischer CS (2025),

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01098-1.2305.01434 2025

  4. [4]

    Bernhardt J, Fischer CS, Isserstedt P and Schaefer BJ (2021)

    Quark mass dependence of a QCD critical point and structure of the Columbia plot2507.21680. Bernhardt J, Fischer CS, Isserstedt P and Schaefer BJ (2021). Critical endpoint of QCD in a finite volume.Phys. Rev. D104 (7): 074035. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074035.2107.05504. Bhattacharya T and et al. (2014). QCD Phase Transition with Chiral Quarks and Physica...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.074035.2107.05504 2021

  5. [5]

    Is there still any Tc mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III

    doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)073.1005.3508. Borsanyi S, Fodor Z, Guenther JN, Kara R, Katz SD, Parotto P, Pasztor A, Ratti C and Szabo KK (2020). The QCD crossover at finite chemical potential from lattice simulations.Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (5): 052001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.052001.2002.02821. Braun J (2012). Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in S...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2010)073.1005.3508 2010

  6. [6]

    Braun J and et al

    doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.3.061.2206.10232. Braun J and et al. (2025). Soft modes in hot QCD matter.Phys. Rev. D111 (9): 094010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094010.2310.19853. Braun J, Chen Yr, Fu Wj, Gao F, Huang C, Ihssen F, Kockler K, Lu Y, Pawlowski JM, Rennecke F, Sattler FR, Stoll J, Tan Yy, Wang Zn, Wen R, Wessely J, Yin S, Zheng Hw and Zorbach N...

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.6.3.061.2206.10232 2025

  7. [7]

    Cuteri F, Goswami J, Karsch F, Lahiri A, Neumann M, Philipsen O, Schmidt C and Sciarra A (2022)

    doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)141.2107.12739. Cuteri F, Goswami J, Karsch F, Lahiri A, Neumann M, Philipsen O, Schmidt C and Sciarra A (2022). Toward the chiral phase transition in the roberge-weiss plane.Phys. Rev. D106 (1): 014510. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014510.2205.12707. D’Ambrosio A, Philipsen O and Kaiser R (2023). The chiral phase transition at non-zer...

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)141.2107.12739 2021

  8. [8]

    D’Ambrosio A, Fromm M, Kaiser R and Philipsen O (2025),

    doi:10.22323/1.430.0172.2212.03655. D’Ambrosio A, Fromm M, Kaiser R and Philipsen O (2025),

    work page doi:10.22323/1.430.0172.2212.03655 2025

  9. [9]

    The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary chemical potential

    On the nature of the QCD chiral phase transition with imaginary chemical potential 2512.15418. de Forcrand P and Philipsen O (2002). The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary chemical potential.Nucl. Phys.B642: 290–306. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00626-0.hep-lat/0205016. de Forcrand P and Philipsen O (2010). Constraining the qcd phase diagra...

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00626-0.hep-lat/0205016 2002

  10. [10]

    Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states

    Hadron physics with functional methods2503.10397. Eichmann G, Sanchis-Alepuz H, Williams R, Alkofer R and Fischer CS (2016). Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91: 1–100. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.07.001.1606.09602. Ejiri S, Karsch F and Redlich K (2006). Hadronic fluctuations at the qcd phase transition.Phys. Lett. B63...

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.07.001.1606.09602 2016

  11. [12]

    Abratenko et al

    Phase structure and observables at high densities from first principles QCD2603.11135. Fischer CS, Fister L, Luecker J and Pawlowski JM (2014a). Polyakov loop potential at finite density.Phys. Lett.B732: 273–277. doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2014.03.057.1306.6022. Fischer CS, Luecker J and Welzbacher CA (2014b). Phase structure of three and four flavor QCD.Phy...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2014

  12. [13]

    Fluctuations as probe of the QCD phase transition and freeze-out in heavy ion collisions at LHC and RHIC

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1694-2.1103.3511. Fromm M, Langelage J, Lottini S and Philipsen O (2012). The qcd deconfinement transition for heavy quarks and all baryon chemical potentials.JHEP 01:

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1694-2.1103.3511 2012

  13. [14]

    The QCD deconfinement transition for heavy quarks and all baryon chemical potentials

    doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2012)042.1111.4953. Fu Wj (2022). QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview.Commun. Theor. Phys.74 (9): 097304. doi:10.1088/ 1572-9494/ac86be.2205.00468. Fu Wj, Pawlowski JM and Rennecke F (2020). QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density.Phys. Rev. D101 (5): 054032. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.101...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2012)042.1111.4953 2012

  14. [15]

    Polyakov loop and QCD thermodynamics from the gluon and ghost propagators

    Strangeness neutrality and the QCD phase diagram2603.13455. Fukushima K and Kashiwa K (2013). Polyakov loop and QCD thermodynamics from the gluon and ghost propagators.Phys. Lett.B723: 360–364. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.037.1206.0685. Fukushima K and Skokov V (2017). Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.96: 154–199. doi:10.1016/j...

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.037.1206.0685 2013

  15. [16]

    Greensite J (2003)

    hep-ph/0611146. Greensite J (2003). The confinement problem in lattice gauge theory.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.51:

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [17]

    The Confinement Problem in Lattice Gauge Theory

    doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(03)90012-3. hep-lat/0301023. Greensite J (2011). An introduction to the confinement problem,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0146-6410(03)90012-3 2011

  17. [18]

    Gross DJ, Pisarski RD and Yaffe LG (1981)

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14382-3. Gross DJ, Pisarski RD and Yaffe LG (1981). QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature.Rev. Mod. Phys.53:

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14382-3 1981

  18. [19]

    Gunkel PJ and Fischer CS (2021)

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.53.43. Gunkel PJ and Fischer CS (2021). Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects.Phys. Rev. D104 (5): 054022. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.054022.2106.08356. Haas LM, Stiele R, Braun J, Pawlowski JM and Schaffner-Bielich J (2013). Improved Polyakov-loop potential for effective models from functional calculati...

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.53.43 2021

  19. [20]

    Horak, J

    doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.149. 2210.07597. Horak J, Pawlowski JM and Wink N (2025). On the complex structure of Yang-Mills theory.SciPost Phys. Core8:

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.15.4.149 2025

  20. [21]

    8.3.048.2202.09333

    doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore. 8.3.048.2202.09333. Huang Yz, Yin S, Han Sn, Wu J, Li F and Fu Wj (2026),

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore 2026

  21. [22]

    Huber MQ (2025),

    Functional renormalization group study of the jet quenching parameter near the QCD critical end point2605.30816. Huber MQ (2025),

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [23]

    Huber MQ, Fischer CS and Sanchis-Alepuz H (2020)

    A beginner’s guide to functional methods in particle physics2510.18960. Huber MQ, Fischer CS and Sanchis-Alepuz H (2020). Spectrum of scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs from functional methods.Eur. Phys. J. C80 (11):

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [24]

    Huber MQ, Fischer CS and Sanchis-Alepuz H (2021)

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08649-6.2004.00415. Huber MQ, Fischer CS and Sanchis-Alepuz H (2021). Higher spin glueballs from functional methods.Eur. Phys. J. C81 (12):

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08649-6.2004.00415 2004

  24. [25]

    Scattering of massless scalar field by charged dila- tonic black holes.The European Physical Journal C, 80:654, 2020

    doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-021-09864-5. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 82, 38 (2022)],2110.09180. Huber MQ, Fischer CS and Sanchis-Alepuz H (2025). Apparent convergence in functional glueball calculations.Eur. Phys. J. C85 (8):

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2022

  25. [26]

    Ihssen F, Pawlowski JM, Sattler FR and Wink N (2024),

    doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14590-3.2503.03821. Ihssen F, Pawlowski JM, Sattler FR and Wink N (2024),

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14590-3.2503.03821 2024

  26. [27]

    Perivolaropoulos, Isotropy properties of the absolute luminosity magnitudes of SnIa in the Pantheon+ and SH0ES sam- ples

    Towards quantitative precision in functional QCD I2408.08413. Isserstedt P, Fischer CS and Steinert T (2021). Thermodynamics from the quark condensate.Phys. Rev. D103 (5): 054012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 103.054012.2012.04991. Jeon S and Koch V (2000). Charged particle ratio fluctuation as a signal for qgp.Phys. Rev. Lett.85: 2076–2079. doi:10.1103/PhysRevL...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2021

  27. [28]

    Real-Time Correlation Functions in the O(N) Model from the Functional Renormalization Group

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2806-6.1302.6199. Karsch F (2019). Critical behavior and net-charge fluctuations from lattice qcd.PoSCORFU2018:

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2806-6.1302.6199 2019

  28. [29]

    Kashiwa K and Maezawa Y (2012),

    doi:10.22323/1.347.0163.1905.03936. Kashiwa K and Maezawa Y (2012),

    work page doi:10.22323/1.347.0163.1905.03936 1905

  29. [30]

    Quark back reaction to deconfinement transition via gluon propagators

    Quark back reaction to deconfinement transition via gluon propagators1212.2184. Kiyohara A, Kitazawa M, Ejiri S and Kanaya K (2021). Finite-size scaling around the critical point in the heavy quark region of qcd.Phys. Rev. D104 (11): 114509. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114509.2108.00118. Koch V, Majumder A and Randrup J (2005). Baryon-strangeness correlation...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.114509.2108.00118 2021

  30. [31]

    On Gauge Invariant Wilsonian Flows

    doi:10.1016/ 0370-1573(87)90121-9. Litim DF and Pawlowski JM (1998), 9, On gauge invariant Wilsonian flows, Workshop on the Exact Renormalization Group, 168–185,hep-th/9901063. Lu Y, Gao F, Liu YX and Pawlowski JM (2024). QCD equation of state and thermodynamic observables from computationally minimal Dyson-Schwinger equations.Phys. Rev. D110 (1): 014036....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.014036.2310.18383 1998

  31. [32]

    Lu Y, Fischer CS, Gao F, Liu Yx and Pawlowski JM (2026),

    Finite density signatures of confining and chiral dynamics in QCD thermodynamics and fluctuations of conserved charges2504.05099. Lu Y, Fischer CS, Gao F, Liu Yx and Pawlowski JM (2026),

    arXiv 2026

  32. [33]

    Luo X and Xu N (2017)

    Extracting freeze-out conditions in beam energy scan via functional QCD2603.09336. Luo X and Xu N (2017). Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview.Nucl. Sci. Tech.28 (8):

    arXiv 2017

  33. [34]

    Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview

    doi:10.1007/s41365-017-0257-0.1701.02105. Marhauser F and Pawlowski JM (2008). Confinement in Polyakov Gauge0812.1144. Mari Surkau VT and Reinosa U (2026),

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41365-017-0257-0.1701.02105 2008

  34. [35]

    Motta TF, Bernhardt J, Buballa M and Fischer CS (2023)

    Interplay between the chiral and deconfinement transitions from a Curci-Ferrari-based Polyakov loop potential 2601.15839. Motta TF, Bernhardt J, Buballa M and Fischer CS (2023). Toward a stability analysis of inhomogeneous phases in QCD.Phys. Rev. D108 (11): 114019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114019.2306.09749. Motta TF, Bernhardt J, Buballa M and Fischer C...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.114019.2306.09749 2023

  35. [36]

    Dijkstra and Yoshitaka Tanimura

    Inhomogeneous instabilities in high-density QCD2512.20510. Pisarski RD and Rennecke F (2021). Signatures of Moat Regimes in Heavy-Ion Collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (15): 152302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 127.152302.2103.06890. Pisarski RD and Rennecke F (2024). Conjectures about the Chiral Phase Transition in QCD from Anomalous Multi-Instanton Interaction...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2021

  36. [37]

    2404.06118

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13801-1. 2404.06118. Reinosa U, Serreau J, Tissier M and Wschebor N (2015a). Deconfinement transition in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory: A two-loop study.Phys. Rev.D91: 045035. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.045035.1412.5672. Reinosa U, Serreau J, Tissier M and Wschebor N (2015b). Deconfinement transition in SU(N) theories from perturbation ...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13801-1 2015

  37. [38]

    Hadron Resonance Gas Model with Induced Surface Tension

    doi:10.1140/epja/i2018-12535-1.1703.00049. Saito H, Ejiri S, Aoki S, Hatsuda T, Kanaya K, Maezawa Y, Ohno H and Umeda T (WHOT-QCD) (2011). Phase structure of finite temperature qcd in the heavy quark region.Phys. Rev. D84: 054502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.079902. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 85, 079902 (2012)],1106.0974. Santowsky N, Eichmann G, Fischer CS, Wallbo...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2018-12535-1.1703.00049 2011

  38. [39]

    Lepton asymmetry and the cosmic QCD transition

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/11/025. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2010)],0906.3434. Stephanov MA, Rajagopal K and Shuryak EV (1998). Signatures of the tricritical point in qcd.Phys. Rev. Lett.81: 4816–4819. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.81.4816.hep-ph/9806219. Stephanov MA, Rajagopal K and Shuryak EV (1999). Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/11/025 2009

  39. [40]

    Tan Yy, Yin S, Chen Yr, Huang C and Fu Wj (2025),

    doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhys.12.1.026.2107.06482. Tan Yy, Yin S, Chen Yr, Huang C and Fu Wj (2025),

    arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    Vovchenko V, Savchuk O, Poberezhnyuk RV, Gorenstein MI and Koch V (2020)

    Real-time evolution of critical modes in the QCD phase diagram2512.03614. Vovchenko V, Savchuk O, Poberezhnyuk RV, Gorenstein MI and Koch V (2020). Connecting fluctuation measurements in heavy-ion collisions with the grand-canonical susceptibilities.Phys. Lett. B811: 135868. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135868.2003.13905. Wan Zy, Lu Y, Gao F and Liu Yx (20...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135868.2003.13905 2020

  41. [42]

    Contessi, M

    doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.24.475. Williams R (2019). Vector mesons as dynamical resonances in the Bethe–Salpeter framework.Phys. Lett. B798: 134943. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019. 134943.1804.11161. Zhang Y, Wang Z, Luo X and Xu N (2026), 2, Search for the QCD Critical Point in High Energy Nuclear Collisions: A Status Report,2602.08356

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019 2019