pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04936 · v1 · pith:VOQEDJ4Jnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · physics.comp-ph

Stabilizing the parquet problem

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 04:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el physics.comp-ph
keywords parquet equationsconvergence stabilityJacobian spectrumLuttinger-Ward functionalHubbard modelvertex divergencesfixed-point iterationatomic limit
0
0 comments X

The pith

Convergence failures in solving the parquet equations occur even without vertex divergences and can be fixed by a Jacobian-based stabilization strategy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes why iterative solutions of the parquet equations stop converging at moderate to strong interactions. It demonstrates that these failures are not limited to regions where the two-particle irreducible vertex diverges and are not caused by crossings between different solutions of the Luttinger-Ward functional. Stability is instead tied to an explicit criterion involving the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix that arises in the standard damped fixed-point iteration. The authors then present a controlled stabilization procedure that steers the iteration to the physical solution even when the undamped procedure is unstable. This procedure is shown to work for the zero-point model and the Hubbard model in the atomic limit, reaching solutions deep inside the non-perturbative regime across several divergence lines.

Core claim

The physical fixed point of the parquet iteration becomes unstable when the spectrum of the Jacobian of the damped fixed-point iteration satisfies an explicit criterion. Misleading convergence issues appear independently of divergences of the two-particle irreducible vertex and are therefore not directly produced by crossings of solutions of the multivalued Luttinger-Ward functional. A controlled stabilization strategy restores convergence to the physical solution in the identified instability regimes, as verified explicitly for the zero-point model and the atomic-limit Hubbard model.

What carries the argument

The spectrum of the Jacobian associated with the damped fixed-point iteration procedure, which supplies the explicit stability criterion for the physical fixed point.

If this is right

  • The physical solution remains reachable by iteration even when the two-particle vertex diverges.
  • Convergence can be maintained across multiple divergence lines of the Luttinger-Ward functional.
  • The same stabilization procedure applies to both the zero-point model and the atomic-limit Hubbard model.
  • Misleading convergence failures are decoupled from the multivalued character of the Luttinger-Ward functional.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Jacobian diagnostic could be applied to other self-consistent diagrammatic schemes that rely on fixed-point iteration.
  • The method may allow parquet-based calculations to reach intermediate-coupling regimes relevant to real materials without manual intervention.
  • Similar stability analysis might clarify convergence problems reported in related many-body resummation techniques.

Load-bearing premise

The spectrum of the Jacobian of the damped fixed-point iteration fully determines whether the physical fixed point is stable.

What would settle it

An explicit numerical run in which the iteration converges to the physical parquet solution in a parameter region where the Jacobian spectrum predicts instability, or fails to converge in a region where the spectrum predicts stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04936 by Alessandro Toschi, Anna Kauch, Herbert E{\ss}l, Marcel Gievers, Markus Wallerberger, Stefan Rohshap.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The eigenvalues λ (black circles) for the parquet formalism of the HA for two different values of U at ph-symmetry in the complex plane. Colorful circles show the stability regions for given damping parameters p. Left: Fixed point can be stabilized with damping, i.e., by decreasing p. Right: Fixed point cannot be stabilized with damping since some eigenvalues have a negative real part. The vertical black l… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Trajectories of fixed-point iterations with the iterative map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Trajectories of the fixed-point iteration for the map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stability phase space of the parquet formalism with damped iteration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Parquet results for the ZP model with conventional iteration (orange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Analogous parquet results for the ZP model as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Stability phase space for conventional iteration in the HA. The color [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Parquet results for the HA with the conventional iteration (orange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Parquet results for the HA analogous to Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stability phase space for the strong coupling iteration in the ZP model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Parquet results from the strong coupling iteration for the ZP model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Number of iterations for different iteration schemes over interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Minimum, maximum, mean and variance for the absolute value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Parquet results for the ZP model analogous to Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Stability plot for the ZP model if only the diagonal terms of Π are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Diagonal terms of Π for the ZP model over increasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Stability plot for the HA model if only the channel diagonal terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Number of eigenvalues with negative real part in Π for the HA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Stability plot for the ZP model with strong coupling parquet if only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Diagonal terms of ΠF for the ZP model over increasing U, once for Re(δµ) = 0 (left) and once for Re(δµ) = 0.1 (right). The different colors and markers indicate to which the eigenvalue channel belongs to. D Extended results for the Hubbard atom D.1 Negative eigenvalues In this section, we investigate the dependence of the number of negative eigenvalues in the Π matrix (number of eigenvalues of the Jacobia… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Number of negative eigenvalues of Π = 1−J for different sub-Jacobians and different fermionic frequency boxes Nf shown as a function of U with Nb = 7for the HA at half-filling. (a) Only the density-density component of the full Jacobian is diagonalized. At the first vertex divergence (U = 3.628), the number of negative eigenvalues jumps to Nf and, after the second divergence (U = 5.137), to 2Nf . (b) The … view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Number of negative eigenvalues of Π = 1−J for different sub-Jacobians and different bosonic frequency boxes Nb shown as a function of U with Nf = 8 for the HA at half-filling. (a) Only the density-density component of the full Jacobian is diagonalized. (b) The negative eigenvalues of the density and singlet channel sub-Jacobian and of the full Jacobian (c) are shown. p 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 condition number … view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: (a)–(c) Condition number of the eigenbasis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Parquet results for the HA as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Comparison for different damping values and initial inputs of full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Comparison of full iterative parquet with (blue crosses) and without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_26.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We systematically analyze the stability of the iterative solution of the parquet equations by studying the spectrum of the Jacobian associated with the commonly used damped fixed-point iteration procedure. In this context, we provide an explicit criterion that determines when the physical fixed point of the parquet iteration becomes unstable. Importantly, we demonstrate that misleading convergence issues, observed in parquet calculation at intermediate-to-high interaction values, are not restricted to parameter regions where the two-particle irreducible vertex diverges, but can also arise in absence of vertex divergences. Hence, the misleading convergence issues of parquet-based algorithms are not directly caused by the crossings of two solutions of the (multivalued) Luttinger-Ward functional, that are associated with vertex divergences. Building on these insights, we introduce a controlled stabilization strategy that allows the convergence to the physical solution in the instability regimes. We apply this procedure to the zero-point model and the Hubbard model in the atomic limit, where we successfully stabilize the physical solution deep in the non-perturbative regime, even across multiple divergence lines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the stability of the iterative solution of the parquet equations via the spectrum of the Jacobian of the commonly used damped fixed-point iteration. It derives an explicit criterion for when the physical fixed point becomes unstable and shows that misleading convergence issues at intermediate-to-high interactions arise even without divergences in the two-particle irreducible vertex. This decouples the issues from crossings of Luttinger-Ward functional solutions. A controlled stabilization strategy is introduced and demonstrated on the zero-point model and the atomic-limit Hubbard model, where the physical solution is stabilized deep in the non-perturbative regime across multiple divergence lines.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a systematic diagnostic and practical stabilization method for parquet calculations in strongly correlated systems, addressing a known practical obstacle. The explicit Jacobian-based criterion and its application to concrete models with successful stabilization across divergence lines are strengths that could improve reliability of non-perturbative parquet results.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (stability analysis paragraph): The claim that the Jacobian spectrum of the damped iteration fully determines stability of the physical fixed point (i.e., that convergence fails precisely when an eigenvalue leaves the unit disk) is load-bearing for separating convergence issues from Luttinger-Ward crossings. No independent verification is provided that the eigenvalue threshold coincides with actual loss of convergence in parameter regions without vertex divergences, leaving open whether other mechanisms (finite basin size, damping dependence) could produce the observed failures independently.
minor comments (2)
  1. The definition of the damped iteration map and the precise form of the Jacobian matrix should be stated explicitly with equation numbers in the main text for reproducibility.
  2. In the applications section, quantitative measures of stabilization success (e.g., distance to reference solutions or iteration counts before/after stabilization) would strengthen the demonstration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (stability analysis paragraph): The claim that the Jacobian spectrum of the damped iteration fully determines stability of the physical fixed point (i.e., that convergence fails precisely when an eigenvalue leaves the unit disk) is load-bearing for separating convergence issues from Luttinger-Ward crossings. No independent verification is provided that the eigenvalue threshold coincides with actual loss of convergence in parameter regions without vertex divergences, leaving open whether other mechanisms (finite basin size, damping dependence) could produce the observed failures independently.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification strengthens the claim. The stability criterion follows directly from linear stability analysis of the damped fixed-point map, which by construction identifies loss of local stability when the spectral radius exceeds unity. To address the concern, we will add in the revision a dedicated numerical check: a parameter scan in the zero-point model (away from vertex divergences) that directly compares the eigenvalue threshold against the observed onset of iteration divergence for varying damping factors. This will confirm coincidence and exclude independent mechanisms such as basin-size effects in the presented cases. The abstract and main text will be updated to reference this verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; stability criterion derived directly from Jacobian analysis

full rationale

The paper analyzes the stability of the parquet iteration by computing the spectrum of the Jacobian of the standard damped fixed-point map and derives an explicit criterion for when the physical fixed point loses stability. This is a direct mathematical construction from the iteration procedure itself, not a fit, self-definition, or reduction to prior self-citations. The demonstration that misleading convergence issues occur without vertex divergences follows from applying this criterion to the zero-point and atomic-limit Hubbard models. The introduced stabilization strategy is presented as a controlled procedure built on the same Jacobian analysis. No quoted step reduces the central result to its inputs by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are identifiable. The work relies on standard fixed-point iteration theory and domain assumptions about parquet equations.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The damped fixed-point iteration is the commonly used procedure whose stability is representative of parquet solvers.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for the Jacobian analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1160 out tokens · 36920 ms · 2026-06-28T04:17:16.845253+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    H. Eßl, M. Reitner, E. Kozik and A. Toschi,Origin of misleading convergence in self-consistent many-electron theories: Fundamental aspects and practical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2026), doi:10.1103/zjy7-4jqd

  2. [2]

    De Dominicis and P

    C. De Dominicis and P. C. Martin,Stationary entropy principle and renormalization in normal and superfluid systems. i. algebraic formulation, Journal of Mathematical Physics5(1), 14 (1964), doi:10.1063/1.1704062

  3. [3]

    De Dominicis and P

    C. De Dominicis and P. C. Martin,Stationary entropy principle and renormalization in normal and superfluid systems. ii. diagrammatic formulation, Journal of Mathematical Physics5(1), 31 (1964), doi:10.1063/1.1704064

  4. [4]

    N. E. Bickers,Self-Consistent Many-Body Theory for Condensed Matter Systems, pp. 237–296, Springer New York, New York, NY, ISBN 978-0-387-21717-8, doi:10.1007/0- 387-21717-7 6 (2004)

  5. [5]

    Kozik, M

    E. Kozik, M. Ferrero and A. Georges,Nonexistence of the Luttinger-Ward Functional and Misleading Convergence of Skeleton Diagrammatic Series for Hubbard-Like Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 156402 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.156402

  6. [6]

    Rossi and F

    R. Rossi and F. Werner,Skeleton series and multivaluedness of the self-energy functional in zero space-time dimensions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48(48), 485202 (2015), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/48/485202

  7. [7]

    A. J. Kim and V. Sacksteder,Multivaluedness of the Luttinger-Ward functional in the fermionic and bosonic system with replicas, Phys. Rev. B101, 115146 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115146

  8. [8]

    Kozik, K

    E. Kozik, K. Van Houcke, E. Gull, L. Pollet, N. Prokof’ev, B. Svistunov and M. Troyer, Diagrammatic Monte Carlo for correlated fermions, Europhysics Letters90(1), 10004 (2010), doi:10.1209/0295-5075/90/10004

  9. [9]

    Sch¨ afer, N

    T. Sch¨ afer, N. Wentzell, F. ˇSimkovic, Y.-Y. He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eck- hardt, B. Arzhang, V. Harkov, F. m. c.-M. Le R´ egent, A. Kirsch, Y. Wang et al.,Tracking the footprints of spin fluctuations: A multimethod, multimessen- ger study of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X11, 011058 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011058

  10. [10]

    Sch¨ afer and A

    T. Sch¨ afer and A. Toschi,How to read between the lines of electronic spectra: the diagnostics of fluctuations in strongly correlated electron systems, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33(21), 214001 (2021), doi:10.1088/1361-648X/abeb44

  11. [11]

    Kauch, P

    A. Kauch, P. Pudleiner, K. Astleithner, P. Thunstr¨ om, T. Ribic and K. Held,Generic optical excitations of correlated systems: π-tons, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 047401 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.047401

  12. [12]

    Pudleiner, P

    P. Pudleiner, P. Thunstr¨ om, A. Valli, A. Kauch, G. Li and K. Held,Parquet approxi- mation for molecules: Spectrum and optical conductivity of the Pariser-Parr-Pople model, Phys. Rev. B99, 125111 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.125111

  13. [13]

    Pudleiner, A

    P. Pudleiner, A. Kauch, K. Held and G. Li,Competition between antiferromagnetic and charge density wave fluctuations in the extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075108 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.075108. 48 SciPost Physics Submission

  14. [14]

    J.-M. Lihm, D. Kiese, S.-S. B. Lee and F. B. Kugler,The finite-difference parquet method: Enhanced electron–paramagnon scattering opens a pseudo- gap, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences123(10), e2525308123 (2026), doi:10.1073/pnas.2525308123, https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/ pnas.2525308123

  15. [15]

    S. X. Yang, H. Fotso, J. Liu, T. A. Maier, K. Tomko, E. F. D’Azevedo, R. T. Scalettar, T. Pruschke and M. Jarrell,Parquet approximation for the4 × 4Hubbard cluster, Phys. Rev. E80, 046706 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046706

  16. [16]

    K.-M. Tam, H. Fotso, S.-X. Yang, T.-W. Lee, J. Moreno, J. Ramanujam and M. Jarrell, Solving the parquet equations for the Hubbard model beyond weak coupling, Phys. Rev. E87, 013311 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.013311

  17. [17]

    G. Li, N. Wentzell, P. Pudleiner, P. Thunstr¨ om and K. Held,Efficient implemen- tation of the parquet equations: Role of the reducible vertex function and its kernel approximation, Phys. Rev. B93, 165103 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.165103

  18. [18]

    Wentzell, G

    N. Wentzell, G. Li, A. Tagliavini, C. Taranto, G. Rohringer, K. Held, A. Toschi and S. Andergassen,High-frequency asymptotics of the vertex function: Diagrammatic parametrization and algorithmic implementation, Phys. Rev. B102, 085106 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085106

  19. [19]

    G. Li, A. Kauch, P. Pudleiner and K. Held,The victory project v1.0: An efficient parquet equations solver, Comput. Phys. Commun241, 146 (2019), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.03.008

  20. [20]

    C. J. Eckhardt, C. Honerkamp, K. Held and A. Kauch,Truncated unity parquet solver, Phys. Rev. B101, 155104 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.155104

  21. [21]

    Krien, A

    F. Krien, A. Kauch and K. Held,Tiling with triangles: parquet and GW γ methods unified, Phys. Rev. Research3, 013149 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013149

  22. [22]

    Krien and A

    F. Krien and A. Kauch,The plain and simple parquet approximation: single-and multi-boson exchange in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Europ. Phys. J. B95(4), 69 (2022), doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00329-6

  23. [23]

    Rohshap, M

    S. Rohshap, M. K. Ritter, H. Shinaoka, J. von Delft, M. Wallerberger and A. Kauch, Two-particle calculations with quantics tensor trains: Solving the parquet equations, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023087 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023087

  24. [24]

    Toschi, A

    A. Toschi, A. A. Katanin and K. Held,Dynamical vertex approximation: A step beyond dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B75, 045118 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.045118

  25. [25]

    Sch¨ afer, G

    T. Sch¨ afer, G. Rohringer, O. Gunnarsson, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni and A. Toschi, Divergent precursors of the Mott-Hubbard transition at the two-particle level, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 246405 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.246405

  26. [26]

    Gunnarsson, G

    O. Gunnarsson, G. Rohringer, T. Sch¨ afer, G. Sangiovanni and A. Toschi,Breakdown of traditional many-body theories for correlated electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 056402 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.056402

  27. [27]

    Springer, P

    D. Springer, P. Chalupa, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni and A. Toschi,Interplay between local response and vertex divergences in many-fermion systems with on-site attraction, Physical Review B101(15) (2020), doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.155148. 49 SciPost Physics Submission

  28. [28]

    Gievers, H

    M. Gievers, H. Eßl, S. Rohshap, A. Kauch and A. Toschi,Instabilities in self-consistent diagrammatic approaches and how to cure them,in preparation(2026)

  29. [29]

    Sch¨ afer, S

    T. Sch¨ afer, S. Ciuchi, M. Wallerberger, P. Thunstr¨ om, O. Gunnarsson, G. Sangiovanni, G. Rohringer and A. Toschi,Nonperturbative landscape of the Mott-Hubbard transition: Multiple divergence lines around the critical endpoint, Phys. Rev. B94, 235108 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235108

  30. [30]

    Thunstr¨ om, O

    P. Thunstr¨ om, O. Gunnarsson, S. Ciuchi and G. Rohringer,Analytical investigation of singularities in two-particle irreducible vertex functions of the Hubbard atom, Phys. Rev. B98, 235107 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235107

  31. [31]

    Shinaoka, M

    H. Shinaoka, M. Wallerberger, Y. Murakami, K. Nogaki, R. Sakurai, P. Werner and A. Kauch,Multiscale space-time ansatz for correlation functions of quan- tum systems based on quantics tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X13, 021015 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.021015

  32. [32]

    Adaptive Patching for Tensor Train Computations

    G. Grosso, M. K. Ritter, S. Rohshap, S. Badr, A. Kauch, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft and H. Shinaoka,Adaptive patching for tensor train computations, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.22372 (2026),2602.22372

  33. [33]

    Wallerberger, H

    M. Wallerberger, H. Shinaoka and A. Kauch,Solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation with exponential convergence, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033168 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033168

  34. [34]

    Al-Eryani, M

    A. Al-Eryani, M. Gievers and K. Fraboulet,Functional renormalization with interaction flows: A single-boson exchange perspective and application to electron-phonon systems, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023029 (2026), doi:10.1103/7y6x-p6zx

  35. [35]

    Rohringer, A

    G. Rohringer, A. Valli and A. Toschi,Local electronic correlation at the two-particle level, Phys. Rev. B86, 125114 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.125114

  36. [36]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =

    G. Rohringer, H. Hafermann, A. Toschi, A. A. Katanin, A. E. Antipov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov and K. Held,Diagrammatic routes to nonlocal correlations beyond dynamical mean field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025003 (2018), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025003

  37. [37]

    Held,Beyond DMFT: Spin fluctuations, pseudogaps and superconductivity(2022), doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.03174,2208.03174

    K. Held,Beyond DMFT: Spin fluctuations, pseudogaps and superconductivity(2022), doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.03174,2208.03174

  38. [38]

    E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer and P. Werner, Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.349

  39. [39]

    Van Houcke, E

    K. Van Houcke, E. Kozik, N. Prokof’ev and B. Svistunov,Diagrammatic Monte Carlo, Physics Procedia6, 95 (2010), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.09.034, Computer Simulations Studies in Condensed Matter Physics XXI

  40. [40]

    K. V. Houcke, E. Kozik, R. Rossi, Y. Deng and F. Werner,Physical and unphysical regimes of self-consistent many-body perturbation theory, SciPost Phys.16, 133 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.133

  41. [41]

    A. J. Kim and E. Kozik,Misleading convergence of the skeleton diagrammatic technique: when the correct solution can be found, doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.14768 (2022),2212.14768. 50 SciPost Physics Submission

  42. [42]

    M. Pelz, S. Adler, M. Reitner and A. Toschi,Highly nonperturbative nature of the Mott metal-insulator transition: Two-particle vertex divergences in the coexistence region, Phys. Rev. B108, 155101 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.155101

  43. [43]

    H. Eßl, M. Reitner, G. Sangiovanni and A. Toschi,General Shiba mapping for on-site four-point correlation functions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033061 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033061

  44. [44]

    Vuˇ ciˇ cevi´ c, N

    J. Vuˇ ciˇ cevi´ c, N. Wentzell, M. Ferrero and O. Parcollet,Practical consequences of the Luttinger-Ward functional multivaluedness for cluster DMFT methods, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125141 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.125141

  45. [45]

    Meixner, M

    M. Meixner, M. Reitner, T. Sch¨ afer and A. Toschi,Non-perturbative effects of short-range spatial correlations at the two-particle level, doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.17716 (2025),2512.17716

  46. [46]

    Chalupa, T

    P. Chalupa, T. Sch¨ afer, M. Reitner, D. Springer, S. Andergassen and A. Toschi, Fingerprints of the local moment formation and its Kondo screening in the generalized susceptibilities of many-electron problems, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 056403 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.056403

  47. [47]

    Reitner, P

    M. Reitner, P. Chalupa, L. Del Re, D. Springer, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni and A. Toschi, Attractive effect of a strong electronic repulsion: The physics of vertex divergences, Physical Review Letters125(19) (2020), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.196403

  48. [48]

    Byczuk, M

    K. Byczuk, M. Kollar, K. Held, Y.-F. Yang, I. A. Nekrasov, T. Pruschke and D. Voll- hardt,Kinks in the dispersion of strongly correlated electrons, Nature Physics3(3), 168 (2007), doi:10.1038/nphys538

  49. [49]

    Eckstein, M

    M. Eckstein, M. Kollar and P. Werner,Thermalization after an interac- tion quench in the Hubbard model, Physical Review Letters103(5) (2009), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.056403

  50. [50]

    smok- ing gun

    S. Adler, F. Krien, P. Chalupa-Gantner, G. Sangiovanni and A. Toschi, Non-perturbative intertwining between spin and charge correlations: A “smok- ing gun” single-boson-exchange result, SciPost Phys.16, 054 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.2.054

  51. [51]

    T. B. Mazitov and A. A. Katanin,Local magnetic moment formation and Kondo screening in the half-filled single-band Hubbard model, Physical Review B105(8) (2022), doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.l081111

  52. [52]

    E. A. Stepanov, S. Brener, V. Harkov, M. I. Katsnelson and A. I. Lichtenstein,Spin dynamics of itinerant electrons: Local magnetic moment formation and Berry phase, Physical Review B105(15) (2022), doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.155151

  53. [53]

    Meixner, H

    M. Meixner, H. Eßl, A. Toschi and T. Sch¨ afer,On degeneracies of density, magnetic, and pairing responses: How competing orders echo underlying symmetries in the Hubbard model,in preparation(2026)

  54. [54]

    Badr,ParquetIR.jl: Efficiently solving the parquet equations using a sparse repre- sentation, doi:https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2024.126082 (2024)

    S. Badr,ParquetIR.jl: Efficiently solving the parquet equations using a sparse repre- sentation, doi:https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2024.126082 (2024)

  55. [55]

    Reitner, L

    M. Reitner, L. Del Re, M. Capone and A. Toschi,Nonperturbative feats in the physics of correlated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033264 (2025), doi:10.1103/ympr- 9m73. 51 SciPost Physics Submission

  56. [56]

    Generating functional for the full parquet approximation

    V. Janis,Generating functional for the full parquet approximation, doi:10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/9806118 (1998),cond-mat/9806118

  57. [57]

    Janiˇ s,Stability of self-consistent solutions for the Hubbard model at intermediate and strong coupling, Phys

    V. Janiˇ s,Stability of self-consistent solutions for the Hubbard model at intermediate and strong coupling, Phys. Rev. B60(16), 11345 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.11345

  58. [58]

    C. J. Eckhardt, P. Kappl, A. Kauch and K. Held,A functional-analysis derivation of the parquet equation, SciPost Phys.15, 203 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.5.203

  59. [59]

    Janiˇ s, A

    V. Janiˇ s, A. Kauch and V. Pokorn´ y,Thermodynamically consistent description of criticality in models of correlated electrons, Phys. Rev. B95, 045108 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.045108

  60. [60]

    Chalupa-Gantner,The nonperturbative feats of local electronic correlation: The physics of irreducible vertex divergences, Ph.D

    P. Chalupa-Gantner,The nonperturbative feats of local electronic correlation: The physics of irreducible vertex divergences, Ph.D. thesis, doi:10.34726/HSS.2022.58056 (2022)

  61. [61]

    Wieser,Violation of Ward Identities in the Parquet Approximation(2023)

    D. Wieser,Violation of Ward Identities in the Parquet Approximation(2023)

  62. [62]

    Ayral and O

    T. Ayral and O. Parcollet,Mott physics and collective modes: An atomic approxi- mation of the four-particle irreducible functional, Phys. Rev. B94, 075159 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075159

  63. [63]

    Argyris, G

    J. Argyris, G. Faust, M. Haase and R. Friedrich,Die Erforschung des Chaos, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 9783662545461, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54546-1 (2017)

  64. [64]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, Studies in Nonlinearity. Westview Press, Cambridge (Mass.), ISBN 978-0-7382-0453-6, doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429492563 (1994)

  65. [65]

    S¨ uli and D

    E. S¨ uli and D. F. Mayers,An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Cambridge University Press (2003)

  66. [66]

    D. G. Anderson,Iterative Procedures for Nonlinear Integral Equations, Journal of the ACM12(4), 547 (1965), doi:10.1145/321296.321305

  67. [67]

    Pollock and L

    S. Pollock and L. G. Rebholz,Anderson acceleration for contractive and non- contractive operators, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis41(4), 2841 (2021), doi:10.1093/imanum/draa095

  68. [68]

    Fang and Y

    H.-r. Fang and Y. Saad,Two classes of multisecant methods for nonlinear acceleration, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications16(3), 197 (2009), doi:10.1002/nla.617

  69. [69]

    H. F. Walker and P. Ni,Anderson Acceleration for Fixed-Point Iterations, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis49(4), 1715 (2011), doi:10.1137/10078356X

  70. [70]

    Y. Yang, A. Townsend and D. Appel¨ o,Anderson acceleration based on the H–s Sobolev norm for contractive and noncontractive fixed-point operators, Journal of Computa- tional and Applied Mathematics403, 113844 (2022), doi:10.1016/j.cam.2021.113844

  71. [71]

    P. K. Mogensen, K. Carlsson, S. Villemot, S. Lyon, M. Gomez, C. Rackauckas, T. Holy, D. Widmann, T. Kelman, D. Karrasch, A. Levitt, A. N. Risethet al., JuliaNLSolvers/NLsolve.jl: v4.5.1, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4404703 (2020)

  72. [72]

    Georges , author G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth and M. J. Rozenberg,Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13. 52 SciPost Physics Submission

  73. [73]

    E. L. Allgower and K. Georg,Introduction to Numerical Continuation Methods, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, ISBN 978-0-89871-544-6 978-0-89871-915-4, doi:10.1137/1.9780898719154 (2003)

  74. [74]

    Reitner, L

    M. Reitner, L. Crippa, D. R. Fus, J. C. Budich, A. Toschi and G. Sangiovanni, Protection of correlation-induced phase instabilities by exceptional susceptibilities, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022031 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022031

  75. [75]

    I. V. Oseledets,Approximation of matrices with logarithmic number of parameters, Doklady Mathematics80(2), 653 (2009), doi:10.1134/s1064562409050056

  76. [76]

    M. K. Ritter, Y. N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka and X. Waintal,Quantics tensor cross interpolation for high-resolution parsimonious representations of multivariate functions, Physical Review Letters132(5) (2024), doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.132.056501

  77. [77]

    Diagnosing phase transitions through time-scale entanglement

    S. Rohshap, H. Ishida, F. Bippus, A. Kauch, K. Held, H. Shinaoka and M. Wallerberger,Diagnosing phase transitions through time scale entanglement, doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.11276 (2025),2507.11276

  78. [78]

    Rohshap, J.-W

    S. Rohshap, J.-W. Li, A. Lorenz, S. Hasil, K. Held, A. Kauch and M. Wallerberger, Entanglement across scales: Quantics tensor trains as a natural framework for renor- malization, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043313 (2025), doi:10.1103/qlrs-6f8t

  79. [79]

    Gievers, Marcel, Walter, Elias, Ge, Anxiang, Delft, Jan von and Kugler, Fabian B., Multiloop flow equations for single-boson exchange fRG, Eur. Phys. J. B95(7), 108 (2022), doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00353-6

  80. [80]

    Kiese, N

    D. Kiese, N. Wentzell, I. Krivenko, O. Parcollet, K. Held and F. Krien,Embedded multi-boson exchange: A step beyond quantum cluster theories, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043159 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043159

Showing first 80 references.